Towards in situ tissue repair: human mesenchymal stem cells express chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2 and CCR2, and migrate upon stimulation with CXCL8 but not CCL2

The recruitment of bone marrow CD34- mesenchymal stem- and progenitor cells (MSC) and their subsequent differentiation into distinct tissues is the precondition for in situ tissue engineering. The objective of this study was to determine the entire chemokine receptor expression profile of human MSC and to investigate their chemotactic response to the selected chemokines CCL2, CXCL8 and CXCL12. Human MSC were isolated from iliac crest bone marrow aspirates and showed a homogeneous population presenting a typical MSC-related cell surface antigen profile (CD14-, CD34-, CD44+, CD45-, CD166+, SH-2+). The expression profile of all 18 chemokine receptors was determined by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Both methods consistently demonstrated that MSC express CC, CXC, C and CX(3)C receptors. Gene expression and immunohistochemical analysis documented that MSC express chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR8, CXCR1, CXCR2 and CXCR3. A dose-dependent chemotactic activity of CXCR4 and CXCR1/CXCR2 ligands CXCL12 and CXCL8 (interleukin-8) was demonstrated using a 96-well chemotaxis assay. In contrast, the CCR2 ligand CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, MCP-1) did not recruited human MSC. In conclusion, we report that the chemokine receptor expression profile of human MSC is much broader than known before. Furthermore, for the first time, we demonstrate that human MSC migrate upon stimulation with CXCL8 but not CCL2. In combination with already known data on MSC recruitment and differentiation these are promising results towards in situ regenerative medicine approaches based on guiding of MSC to sites of degenerated tissues.     

Tanshinone IIA and astragaloside IV promote the migration of mesenchymal stem cells by up-regulation of CXCR4

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have a therapeutic potential to treat cardiovascular diseases. However, a significant barrier to MSC therapy is insufficient MSC engraftment in ischemic myocardium after systemic administration. Here, we investigated the modulatory effects of tanshinone IIA and astragaloside IV on the migration of MSCs and further defined the underlying mechanisms. CXCR4 expression in MSCs was determined by using flow cytometry, real-time PCR, and western blotting. The results showed that CXCR4 expression was significantly higher in tanshinone IIA- and astragaloside IV-stimulated MSCs than that of the control. MSC migration toward stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) was studied using a transwell system. MSCs treated with tanshinone IIA and astragaloside IV showed stronger migration than that of the control. Moreover, this enhanced migration ability was abrogated by a CXCR4 inhibitor. In a rat acute myocardial infarction model, MSCs stimulated with tanshinone IIA and astragaloside IV were stained with Dio and injected into model rats via the tail vein. Dio-labeled cells in myocardium sections were observed by fluorescence microscopy. Tanshinone IIA- and astragaloside IV-stimulated MSCs showed enhanced capacities to home to ischemic myocardium sites. In addition, there was no significant difference in the SDF-1α expression among groups. These data suggest that tanshinone IIA and astragaloside IV regulate MSC mobilization, at least partially via modulation of the CXCR4 expression.     

IL-8-induced migratory responses through CXCR1 and CXCR2: association with phosphorylation and cellular redistribution of focal adhesion kinase

CXCR1 and CXCR2 mediate migratory activities in response to IL-8 and other ELR+-CXC chemokines (e.g., GCP-2 and NAP-2). In vitro, activation of migration is induced by low IL-8 concentrations (10-50 ng/mL), whereas migratory shut-off is induced by high IL-8 concentrations (1000 ng/mL). The stimulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 by IL-8 concentrations that result in migratory activation induced focal adhesion kinase (FAK) phosphorylation in a G(alpha)i-dependent manner. The expression of FRNK, a dominant negative mutant of FAK, perturbed migratory responses to the activating dose of 50 ng/mL IL-8. The migration-activating concentrations of 50 ng/mL GCP-2 and NAP-2 induced less potent migratory responses and FAK phosphorylation in CXCR2-expressing cells as compared with IL-8. These results indicate that FAK is phosphorylated, and required, for the chemotactic response under conditions of migratory activation by ELR+-CXC chemokines. In addition, FAK phosphorylation was determined following exposure to migration-attenuating concentrations of IL-8. In CXCR1-RBL cells this treatment resulted in FAK phosphorylation, in similar levels to those induced by activating concentrations of IL-8. In contrast, in CXCR2-RBL cells the migration-attenuating concentrations of IL-8 induced promoted levels of FAK phosphorylation and different patterns of FAK phosphorylation on its six potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites, as compared to activating concentrations of the chemokine. Exposure to IL-8 resulted not only in FAK phosphorylation but also in its cellular redistribution, indicated by the formation of defined contact regions with the substratum, enriched in phosphorylated FAK and vinculin. Overall, FAK phosphorylation was associated with, and found to be differently regulated upon, ELR+-CXC chemokine-induced migration.     

Il-8((3-73))K11R is a high affinity agonist of the neutrophil CXCR1 and CXCR2

In studies aimed at developing a high affinity IL-8 antagonist, our first objective was to generate a high-affinity IL-8 analogue. We targeted amino acids within the receptor-binding domain and found that IL-8((3-73))K11R induced significantly more neutrophil beta-glucuronidase release than either IL-8 or the alternate analogues and, in chemotaxis assays, induced 2-3-fold greater neutrophil responses than IL-8. Furthermore, in competitive radio- or biotinylated-ligand binding assays, IL-8((3-73))K11R was more effective than IL-8, IL-8((3-73)), or its T12S, H13F, and K11R/T12S/H13F analogues in blocking IL-8 binding to neutrophils; 1.8 pmol IL-8((3-73))K11R inhibited by 50% the binding of approximately 20 pmol (125)I-IL-8 to neutrophils. Both IL-8 (a CXCR1/CXCR2 ligand) and the CXCR2-specific ligand GROalpha differentially inhibited binding of (125)I-IL-8((3-73))K11R to neutrophils, albeit weakly, suggesting that IL-8((3-73))K11R is a high affinity ligand for both the CXCR1 and CXCR2. Thus IL-8((3-73))K11R is an excellent candidate for further studies aimed at generating a high affinity IL-8 antagonist.     

SDF-1/CXCR4 axis modulates bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell apoptosis,migration and cytokine secretion

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered as a promising cell source to treat the acute myocardial infarction. However, over 90% of the stem cells usually die in the first three days of transplantation. Survival potential, migration ability and paracrine capacity have been considered as the most important three factors for cell transplantation in the ischemic cardiac treatment. We hypothesized that stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 axis plays a critical role in the regulation of these processes. In this study, apoptosis was induced by exposure of MSCs to H₂O₂ for 2 h. After re-oxygenation, the SDF-1 pretreated MSCs demonstrated a significant increase in survival and proliferation. SDF-1 pretreatment also enhanced the migration and increased the secretion of pro-survival and angiogenic cytokines including basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor. Western blot and RT-PCR demonstrated that SDF-1 pretreatment significantly activated the pro-survival Akt and Erk signaling pathways and up-regulated Bcl-2/Bax ratio. These protective effects were partially inhibited by AMD3100, an antagonist of CXCR4. We conclude that the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis is critical for MSC survival, migration and cytokine secretion.     

IL-8 activates endothelial cell CXCR1 and CXCR2 through Rho and Rac signaling pathways

Stimulation of microvascular endothelial cells with interleukin (IL)-8 leads to cytoskeletal reorganization, which is mediated by combined activation of the CXCR1 and the CXCR2. In the early phase actin stress fibers appear, followed by cortical actin accumulation and cell retraction leading to gap formation between cells. The early response (between 1 and 5 min) is inhibited by an antibody that blocks the CXCR1. The later phase (from about 5 to 60 min), which is associated with cell retraction, is prevented by anti-CXCR2 antibody. Furthermore, anti-CXCR2, but not anti-CXCR1, antibody blocked IL-8-mediated haptotaxis of endothelial cells on collagen. The later phase of the IL-8-mediated actin response is inhibited by pertussis toxin, indicating that the CXCR2 couples to G(i). In contrast, the early phase is blocked by C3 botulinum toxin, which inactivates Rho, and by Y-27632, which inhibits Rho kinase, but not by pertussis toxin. Furthermore, the early CXCR1-mediated formation of stress fibers was prevented by dominant negative Rho. Dominant negative Rac on the other hand initially translocated to actin-rich filopodia after stimulation with IL-8 and later prevented cell retraction by blocking the CXCR2-mediated cytoskeletal response. These results indicate that IL-8 activates both the CXCR1 and the CXCR2 on microvascular endothelial cells, using different signal transduction cascades. The retraction of endothelial cells due to activation of the CXCR2 may contribute to the increased vascular permeability observed in acute inflammation and during the angiogenic response.     

The chemokine interleukin-8 acutely reduces Ca(2+) currents in identified cholinergic septal neurons expressing CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptor mRNAs

The chemokine IL-8 is known to be synthesized by glial cells in the brain. It has traditionally been shown to have an important role in neuroinflammation but recent evidence indicates that it may also be involved in rapid signaling in neurons. We investigated how IL-8 participates in rapid neuronal signaling by using a combination of whole-cell recording and single-cell RT-PCR on dissociated rat septal neurons. We show that IL-8 can acutely reduce Ca(2+) currents in septal neurons, an effect that was concentration-dependent, involved the closure of L- and N-type Ca(2+) channels, and the activation of G(ialpha1) and/or G(ialpha2) subtype(s) of G-proteins. Analysis of the mRNAs from the recorded neurons revealed that the latter were all cholinergic in nature. Moreover, we found that all cholinergic neurons that responded to IL-8, expressed mRNAs for either one or both IL-8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. This is the first report of a chemokine that modulates ion channels in neurons via G-proteins, and the first demonstration that mRNAs for CXCR1 are expressed in the brain. Our results suggest that IL-8 release by glial cells in vivo may activate CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors on cholinergic septal neurons and acutely modulate their excitability by closing calcium channels.     

Decreased CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression on neutrophils in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitides potentially increases neutrophil adhesion and impairs migration

Introduction

In anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV), persistent inflammation within the vessel wall suggests perturbed neutrophil trafficking leading to accumulation of activated neutrophils in the microvascular compartment. CXCR1 and CXCR2, being major chemokine receptors on neutrophils, are largely responsible for neutrophil recruitment. We speculate that down-regulated expression of CXCR1/2 retains neutrophils within the vessel wall and, consequently, leads to vessel damage.

Methods

Membrane expression of CXCR1/2 on neutrophils was assessed by flow cytometry. Serum levels of interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), angiopoietin 1 and angiopoietin 2 from quiescent and active AAV patients and healthy controls (HC) were quantified by ELISA. Adhesion and transendothelial migration of isolated neutrophils were analyzed using adhesion assays and Transwell systems, respectively.

Results

Expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2 on neutrophils was significantly decreased in AAV patients compared to HC. Levels of IL-8, which, as TNFα, dose-dependently down-regulated CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression on neutrophils in vitro, were significantly increased in the serum of patients with active AAV and correlated negatively with CXCR1/CXCR2 expression on neutrophils, even in quiescent patients. Blocking CXCR1 and CXCR2 with repertaxin increased neutrophil adhesion and inhibited migration through a glomerular endothelial cell layer.

Conclusions

Expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2 is decreased in AAV, potentially induced by circulating proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-8. Down-regulation of these chemokine receptors could increase neutrophil adhesion and impair its migration through the glomerular endothelium, contributing to neutrophil accumulation and, in concert with ANCA, persistent inflammation within the vessel wall.     

Differential modes of regulation of cxc chemokine-induced internalization and recycling of human CXCR1 and CXCR2

Studies of human neutrophil IL-8 receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, have shown that the two receptors are differentially regulated by ELR⁺-CXC chemokines, that they differ functionally and may have diverse roles in mediating the inflammatory process. To elucidate the role of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in inflammation and to delineate the basis for the divergent regulation of these receptors by IL-8 and NAP-2, we characterized the IL-8- and NAP-2-induced mechanisms regulating the expression of each receptor, focusing on receptor internalization and recycling. Using HEK 293 cell transfectants, IL-8 was shown to induce significantly higher levels of CXCR2 internalization than NAP-2. Moreover, although CXCR2 bound IL-8 and NAP-2 with similarly high affinity, IL-8 functionally competed with and displaced NAP-2, and prompted high levels of internalization, similar to those induced by IL-8 alone. In a system providing an identical cellular milieu for reliable comparisons between CXCR1 and CXCR2, we have shown that the mechanisms controlling the internalization of CXCR1 diverge from those regulating CXCR2 internalization. Whereas IL-8-induced internalization of CXCR1 was profoundly dependent on a region of the carboxyl terminus expressing six phosphorylation sites, internalization of CXCR2 was primarily regulated by a membrane proximal domain of the carboxyl terminus that does not express phosphorylation sites. Analysis of receptor re-expression on the plasma membrane indicated that at early time points following removal of free ligand and incubation of the cells at 37°C, receptor recycling accounted for recovery of CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression, whereas at later time points other processes may be involved in receptor re-expression. Phosphorylation-independent mechanisms were shown to direct both receptors to the recycling pathway. The differential control of CXCR1 vs CXCR2 internalization by IL-8 and NAP-2, as well as by phosphorylation-mediated mechanisms, suggests that a chemokine- and receptor-specific mode of regulation of internalization may contribute to the divergent activities of these receptors.     

Role of the cytoplasmic tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in mediating leukocyte migration,activation, and regulation

IL-8 (or CXCL8) activates the receptors CXCR1 (IL-8RA) and CXCR2 (IL-8RB) to induce chemotaxis in leukocytes, but only CXCR1 mediates cytotoxic and cross-regulatory signals. This may be due to the rapid internalization of CXCR2. To investigate the roles of the intracellular domains in receptor regulation, wild-type, chimeric, phosphorylation-deficient, and cytoplasmic tail (C-tail) deletion mutants of both receptors were expressed in RBL-2H3 cells and studied for cellular activation, receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization. All but one chimeric receptor bound IL-8 and mediated signal transduction, chemotaxis, and exocytosis. Upon IL-8 activation, the chimeric receptors underwent receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. One was resistant to internalization, yet it mediated normal levels of beta-arrestin 2 (beta arr-2) translocation. The lack of internalization by this receptor may be due to its reduced association with beta arr-2 and the adaptor protein-2 beta. The C-tail-deleted and phosphorylation-deficient receptors were resistant to receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, arrestin translocation, and internalization. They also mediated greater phosphoinositide hydrolysis and exocytosis and sustained Ca(2+) mobilization, but diminished chemotaxis. These data indicate that phosphorylation of the C-tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 are required for arrestin translocation and internalization, but are not sufficient to explain the rapid internalization of CXCR2 relative to CXCR1. The data also show that receptor internalization is not required for chemotaxis. The lack of receptor phosphorylation was correlated with greater signal transduction but diminished chemotaxis, indicating that second messenger production, not receptor internalization, negatively regulates chemotaxis.     

The CXCR1 tail mediates beta1 integrin-dependent cell migration via MAP kinase signaling

In this study, we examined how IL-8 induces leukocyte migration on major beta1 integrin ligands derived from the extracellular matrix protein fibronectin. We assessed individual contributions of signaling by IL-8 receptors by transfection of CXCR1 and CXCR2 into rat basophilic leukemia (RBL) cells and human monocytic THP-1 cells. CXCR1 expressing cells migrated on the fibronectin ligands for alpha4beta1 and alpha5beta1 integrins in response to IL-8, whereas CXCR2 expressing cells did not. RBL cells expressing the chimeric CXCR1 receptor containing the cytoplasmic tail of CXCR2 had greatly blunted migration, while cells expressing the CXCR2 chimera with the tail of CXCR1 had augmented migration. Last, inhibitors of p38 and JNK MAP kinases blocked IL-8-induced migration in CXCR1+ cells. We conclude that IL-8 stimulated beta1 integrin-mediated leukocyte migration on fibronectin through CXCR1 is dependent on the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of CXCR1 and subsequent p38 and JNK MAPK signaling.     

C(4)-alkyl substituted furanyl cyclobutenediones as potent, orally bioavailable CXCR2 and CXCR1 receptor antagonists

A novel series of cyclobutenedione centered C(4)-alkyl substituted furanyl analogs was developed as potent CXCR2 and CXCR1 antagonists. Compound 16 exhibits potent inhibitory activities against IL-8 binding to the receptors (CXCR2 Ki=1 nM, IC(50)=1.3 nM; CXCR1 Ki=3 nM, IC(50)=7.3 nM), and demonstrates potent inhibition against both Gro-alpha and IL-8 induced hPMN migration (chemotaxis: CXCR2 IC(50)=0.5 nM, CXCR1 IC(50)=37 nM). In addition, 16 has shown good oral pharmacokinetic profiles in rat, mouse, monkey, and dog.     

Paracrine effect of CXCR4‐overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells on ischemic heart injury

It has been reported that CXCR4‐overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells (MSC^CX4) can repair heart tissue post myocardial infarction. This study aims to investigate the MSCCX4‐derived paracrine cardio‐protective signaling in the presence of myocardial infarction. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were divided into 3 groups: MSC only, MSC^CX4, and CXCR4 gene‐specific siRNA‐transduced MSC. Mesenchymal stem cells were exposed to hypoxia, and then MSCs‐conditioned culture medium was incubated with neonatal and adult cardiomyocytes, respectively. Cell proliferation–regulating genes were assessed by real‐time polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR). In vitro: The number of cardiomyocytes undergoing DNA synthesis, cytokinesis, and mitosis was increased to a greater extent in MSC^CX4 medium‐treated group than control group, while this proproliferative effect was reduced in CXCR4 gene‐specific siRNA‐transduced MSC–treated cells. Accordingly, the maximal enhancement of vascular endothelial growth factor, cyclin 2, and transforming growth factor‐β2 was observed in hypoxia‐exposed MSC^CX4. In vivo: MSCs were labeled with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and engrafted into injured myocardium in rats. The number of EGFP and CD31 positive cells in the MSC^CX4 group was significantly increased than other 2 groups, associated with the reduced left ventricular (LV) fibrosis, the increased LV free wall thickness, the enhanced angiogenesis, and the improved contractile function. CXCR4 overexpression can mobilize MSCs into ischemic area, whereby these cells can promoted angiogenesis and alleviate LV remodeling via paracrine signaling mechanism.     

A functional heteromeric MIF receptor formed by CD74 and CXCR4

MIF is a chemokine-like inflammatory mediator that triggers leukocyte recruitment by binding to CXCR2 and CXCR4. MIF also interacts with CD74/invariant chain, a single-pass membrane-receptor. We identified complexes between CD74 and CXCR2 with a role in leukocyte recruitment. It is unknown whether CD74 also binds to CXCR4. We demonstrate that CD74/CXCR4 complexes formed when CD74 was expressed with CXCR4 in HEK293 cells. Expression of CD74-variants lacking an ER-retention signal showed CD74/CXCR4 complexes at the cell surface. Importantly, endogenous CD74/CXCR4 complexes were isolated by co-immunoprecipitation from monocytes. Finally, MIF-stimulated CD74-dependent AKT activation was blocked by anti-CXCR4 and anti-CD74 antibodies and AMD3100, whereas CXCL12-stimulated AKT activation was not reduced by anti-CD74. Thus, CD74 forms functional complexes with CXCR4 that mediate MIF-specific signaling.

Structured summary

MINT-7234512, MINT-7234528: CD74 (uniprotkb:P04233) physically interacts (MI:0915) with CXCR4 (uniprotkb:P61073) by anti tag coimmunoprecipitation (MI:0007)MINT-7234542: CD74 (uniprotkb:P04233) and CXCR4 (uniprotkb:P61073) physically interact (MI:0915) by anti bait coimmunoprecipitation (MI:0006)MINT-7234499: CXCR4 (uniprotkb:P61073) and CD74 (uniprotkb:P04233) colocalize (MI:0403) by fluorescence microscopy (MI:0416)     

Development of a systemically-active dual CXCR1/CXCR2 allosteric inhibitor and its efficacy in a model of transient cerebral ischemia in the rat

The chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 present on polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN), bind the chemokine CXC ligand 8 (CXCL8)/interleukin-8 (IL-8), and have a key role in PMN recruitment in inflammation. Based on the structure of reparixin, a small-molecular-weight allosteric inhibitor of CXCR1, we designed a dual inhibitor of CXCR1 and CXCR2 with a longer in vivo half-life, DF2156A. This molecule inhibited human and rat PMN migration in response to CXCR1 and CXCR2 ligands and showed an elimination half-life following i.v. administration, of 19 hours. In a rat model of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion induced by temporary (90 min) middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, DF2156A (8 mg-kg, i.v., at the time of reperfusion) decreased the PMN infiltrate, infarct size and significantly improved neurological function. These results indicate that CXCR1/CXCR2 and their ligands have a role in the inflammatory component of cerebral ischemia, and that these pathways represent an important pharmacological target.     

Cross-desensitization among CXCR1, CXCR2, and CCR5: role of protein kinase C-epsilon

The IL-8 (or CXCL8) chemokine receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, activate protein kinase C (PKC) to mediate leukocyte functions. To investigate the roles of different PKC isoforms in CXCL8 receptor activation and regulation, human mononuclear phagocytes were treated with CXCL8 or CXCL1 (melanoma growth-stimulating activity), which is specific for CXCR2. Plasma membrane association was used as a measure of PKC activation. Both receptors induced time-dependent association of PKCalpha, -beta1, and -beta2 to the membrane, but only CXCR1 activated PKCepsilon. CXCL8 also failed to activate PKCepsilon in RBL-2H3 cells stably expressing CXCR2. DeltaCXCR2, a cytoplasmic tail deletion mutant of CXCR2 that is resistant to internalization, activated PKCepsilon as well as CXCR1. Expression of the PKCepsilon inhibitor peptide epsilonV1 in RBL-2H3 cells blocked PKCepsilon translocation and inhibited receptor-mediated exocytosis, but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis or peak intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization. epsilonV1 also inhibited CXCR1-, CCR5-, and DeltaCXCR2-mediated cross-regulatory signals for GTPase activity, Ca(2+) mobilization, and internalization. Peritoneal macrophages from PKCepsilon-deficient mice (PKCepsilon(-/-)) also showed decreased CCR5-mediated cross-desensitization of G protein activation and Ca(2+) mobilization. Taken together, the results indicate that CXCR1 and CCR5 activate PKCepsilon to mediate cross-inhibitory signals. Inhibition or deletion of PKCepsilon decreases receptor-induced exocytosis and cross-regulatory signals, but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis or peak intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization, suggesting that cross-regulation is a Ca(2+)-independent process. Because DeltaCXCR2, but not CXCR2, activates PKCepsilon and cross-desensitizes CCR5, the data further suggest that signal duration leading to activation of novel PKC may modulate receptor-mediated cross-inhibitory signals.     

Actin filaments are involved in the regulation of trafficking of two closely related chemokine receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2

The ligand-induced internalization and recycling of chemokine receptors play a significant role in their regulation. In this study, we analyzed the involvement of actin filaments and of microtubules in the control of ligand-induced internalization and recycling of CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR)1 and CXCR2, two closely related G protein-coupled receptors that mediate ELR-expressing CXC chemokine-induced cellular responses. Nocodazole, a microtubule-disrupting agent, did not affect the IL-8-induced reduction in cell surface expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2, nor did it affect the recycling of these receptors following ligand removal and cell recovery at 37 degrees C. In contrast, cytochalasin D, an actin filament depolymerizing agent, promoted the IL-8-induced reduction in cell surface expression of both CXCR1 and CXCR2. Cytochalasin D significantly inhibited the recycling of both CXCR1 and CXCR2 following IL-8-induced internalization, the inhibition being more pronounced for CXCR2 than for CXCR1. Potent inhibition of recycling was observed also when internalization of CXCR2 was induced by another ELR-expressing CXC chemokine, granulocyte chemotactic protein-2. By the use of carboxyl terminus-truncated CXCR1 and CXCR2 it was observed that the carboxyl terminus domains of CXCR1 and CXCR2 were partially involved in the regulation of the actin-mediated process of receptor recycling. The cytochalasin D-mediated inhibition of CXCR2 recycling had a functional relevance because it impaired the ability of CXCR2-expressing cells to mediate cellular responses. These results suggest that actin filaments, but not microtubules, are involved in the regulation of the intracellular trafficking of CXCR1 and CXCR2, and that actin filaments may be required to enable cellular resensitization following a desensitized refractory period.