A construct of interactive feedback control of the GH axis in the male

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is controlled by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), the GH release-inhibiting hormone somatostatin (SRIF), and autofeedback connections. The ensemble network produces sexually dimorphic patterns of GH secretion. In an effort to formalize this system, we implemented a deterministically based autonomous feedback-driven construct of five principal dose-responsive regulatory interactions: GHRH drive of GH pituitary release, competitive inhibition of GH release by SRIF, GH autofeedback via SRIF with a time delay, delayed GH autonegative feedback on GHRH, and SRIF inhibition of GHRH secretion. This formulation engenders a malelike pattern of successive GH volleys due jointly to positive time-delayed feedback of GH on SRIF and negative feedback of SRIF on GH and GHRH. The multipeak volley is explicated as arising from a reciprocal interaction between GH and GHRH during periods of low SRIF secretion. The applicability of this formalism to neuroendocrine control is explored by initial parameter sensitivity analysis and is illustrated for selected feedback-dependent experimental paradigms. The present construct is not overparameterized and does not require an ad hoc pulse generator to achieve pulsatile GH output. Further evolution of interactive constructs could aid in exploring more complex feedback postulates that confer the vivid sexual dimorphism of female GH profiles.     

Putative GH pulse renewal: periventricular somatostatinergic control of an arcuate-nuclear somatostatin and GH-releasing hormone oscillator

Growth hormone (GH) pulsatility requires periventricular-nuclear somatostatin(SRIF(PeV)), arcuate-nuclear (ArC) GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), and systemic GH autofeedback. However, no current formalism interlinks these regulatory loci in a manner that generates self-renewable GH dynamics. The latter must include in the adult rat 1) infrequent volleys of high-amplitude GH peaks in the male, 2) frequent discrete low-amplitude GH pulses in the female, 3) disruption of the male pattern by severing SRIF(PeV) outflow to ArC, 4) stimulation of GHRH and GH secretion by central nervous system delivery of SRIF, 5) inhibition of GH release by central exposure to GHRH, and 6) a reboundlike burst of GHRH secretion induced by stopping peripheral infusion of SRIF. The present study validates by computer-assisted simulations a simplified ensemble formulation that predicts each of the foregoing six outcomes, wherein 1) blood-borne GH stimulates SRIF(PeV) secretion after a long time latency, 2) SRIF(PeV) inhibits both pituitary GH and ArC GHRH release, 3) ArC GHRH and SRIF(ArC) oscillate reciprocally with brief time delay, and 4) SRIF(PeV) represses and disinhibits the putative GHRH-SRIF(ArC) oscillator. According to the present analytic construction, time-delayed feedforward and feedback signaling among SRIF(PeV), ArC GHRH, and SRIF(ArC) could endow the complex physiological patterns of GH secretion in the male and female.     

Joint pituitary-hypothalamic and intrahypothalamic autofeedback construct of pulsatile growth hormone secretion

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is vividly pulsatile in all mammalian species studied. In a simplified model, self-renewable GH pulsatility can be reproduced by assuming individual, reversible, time-delayed, and threshold-sensitive hypothalamic outflow of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH release-inhibiting hormone (somatostatin; SRIF). However, this basic concept fails to explicate an array of new experimental observations. Accordingly, here we formulate and implement a novel fourfold ensemble construct, wherein 1) systemic GH pulses stimulate long-latency, concentration-dependent secretion of periventricular-nuclear SRIF, thereby initially quenching and then releasing multiphasic GH volleys (recurrent every 3-3.5 h); 2) SRIF delivered to the anterior pituitary gland competitively antagonizes exocytotic release, but not synthesis, of GH during intervolley intervals; 3) arcuate-nucleus GHRH pulses drive the synthesis and accumulation of GH in saturable somatotrope stores; and 4) a purely intrahypothalamic mechanism sustains high-frequency GH pulses (intervals of 30-60 min) within a volley, assuming short-latency reciprocal coupling between GHRH and SRIF neurons (stimulatory direction) and SRIF and GHRH neurons (inhibitory direction). This two-oscillator formulation explicates (but does not prove) 1) the GHRH-sensitizing action of prior SRIF exposure; 2) a three-site (intrahypothalamic, hypothalamo-pituitary, and somatotrope GH store dependent) mechanism driving rebound-like GH secretion after SRIF withdrawal in the male; 3) an obligatory role for pituitary GH stores in representing rebound GH release in the female; 4) greater irregularity of SRIF than GH release profiles; and 5) a basis for the paradoxical GH-inhibiting action of centrally delivered GHRH.     

Deterministic construct of amplifying actions of ghrelin on pulsatile growth hormone secretion

Ghrelin is a native ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptor that stimulates pulsatile GH secretion markedly. At present, no formal construct exists to unify ensemble effects of ghrelin, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SRIF), and GH feedback. To model such interactions, we have assumed that ghrelin can stimulate pituitary GH secretion directly, antagonize inhibition of pituitary GH release by SRIF, oppose suppression of GHRH neurons in the arcuate nucleus (ArC) by SRIF, and induce GHRH secretion from ArC. The dynamics of such connectivity yield self-renewable GH pulse patterns mirroring those in the adult male and female rat and explicate the following key experimental observations. 1) Constant GHS infusion stimulates pulsatile GH secretion. 2) GHS and GHRH display synergy in vivo. 3) A systemic pulse of GHS stimulates GH secretion in the female rat at any time and in the male more during a spontaneous peak than during a trough. 4) Transgenetic silencing of the neuronal GHS receptor blunts GH pulses in the female. 5) Intracerebroventricular administration of GHS induces GH secretion. The minimal construct of GHS-GHRH-SRIF-GH interactions should aid in integrating physiological data, testing regulatory hypotheses, and forecasting innovative experiments.     

Model-projected mechanistic bases for sex differences in growth hormone regulation in humans

Models of physiological systems facilitate rational experimental design, inference, and prediction. A recent construct of regulated growth hormone (GH) secretion interlinks the actions of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SRIF), and GH secretagogues (GHS) with GH feedback in the rat (Farhy LS, Veldhuis JD. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288: R1649-R1663, 2005). In contrast, no comparable formalism exists to explicate GH dynamics in any other species. The present analyses explore whether a unifying model structure can represent species- and sex-defined distinctions in the human and rodent. The consensus principle that GHRH and GHS synergize in vivo but not in vitro was explicable by assuming that GHS 1) evokes GHRH release from the brain, 2) opposes inhibition by SRIF both in the hypothalamus and on the pituitary gland, and 3) stimulates pituitary GH release directly and additively with GHRH. The gender-selective principle that GH pulses are larger and more irregular in women than men was conferrable by way of 4) higher GHRH potency and 5) greater GHS efficacy. The overall construct predicts GHRH/GHS synergy in the human only in the presence of SRIF when the brain-pituitary nexus is intact, larger and more irregular GH pulses in women, and observed gender differences in feedback by GH and the single and paired actions of GHRH, GHS, and SRIF. The proposed model platform should enhance the framing and interpretation of novel clinical hypotheses and create a basis for interspecies generalization of GH-axis regulation.     

Estrogen and androgen elicit growth hormone release via dissimilar patterns of hypothalamic neuropeptide secretion

The dimorphic pattern of growth hormone (GH) secretion and somatic growth in male and female mammals is attributable to the gonadal steroids. Whether these hormones mediate their effects solely on hypothalamic neurons, on somatotropes or on both to evoke the gender-specific GH secretory patterns has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of 17beta-estradiol, testosterone and its metabolites on release of GH, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SRIF) from bovine anterior pituitary cells and hypothalamic slices in an in vitro perifusion system. Physiological concentrations of testosterone and estradiol perifused directly to anterior pituitary cells did not affect GH releases; whereas, dihydrotestosterone and 5alpha-androstane-3alpha, 17beta-diol increased GH. Perifusion of testosterone at a pulsatile rate, and its metabolites and estradiol at a constant rate to hypothalamic slices in series with anterior pituitary cells increased GH release. The androgenic hormones increased GHRH and SRIF release from hypothalamus; whereas, estradiol increased GHRH but decreased SRIF release. Our data show that estradiol and the androgens generated distinctly different patterns of GHRH and SRIF release, which in turn established gender-specific GH patterns.     

Reduced Somatostatin in Hypothalamus of Young Male Mouse Increases Local but not Circulatory GH

The release of growth hormone (GH) from the pituitary gland is primarily inhibited by somatostatin (SRIF) from the hypothalamus via interactions with five types of SRIF receptors (SSTRs). However, the inhibition mechanism of SRIF on GH has not been fully examined. In this study, we repressed the hypothalamic SRIF in young male mice by stereotaxic injection of the lentiviral-shRNA against SRIF to investigate the role of hypothalamic SRIF on hormone secretion in the GH/IGF-1 axis. We found that the reduction of SRIF in hypothalamus was associated with an increase in the protein, but not the mRNA level, of the GH in the pituitary where SSTR 2 and SSTR 5 act importantly. Interestingly, the level of blood circulatory SRIF, GH, IGF-1 and the body weight were not significantly influenced by the downregulation of hypothalamic SRIF. Our findings provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the inhibition of SRIF on GH secretion.     

Pulsatile growth hormone secretion persists in genetic growth hormone-releasing hormone resistance

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is regulated by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin, and possibly ghrelin, but uncertainty remains about the relative contributions of these hypophysiotropic factors to GH pulsatility. Patients with genetic GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) deficiency present an opportunity to examine GH secretory dynamics in the selective absence of GHRH input. We studied circadian GH profiles in four young men homozygous for a null mutation in the GHRH-R gene by use of an ultrasensitive GH assay. Residual GH secretion was pulsatile, with normal pulse frequency, but severely reduced amplitude (<1% normal) and greater than normal process disorder (as assessed by approximate entropy). Nocturnal GH secretion, both basal and pulsatile, was enhanced compared with daytime. We conclude that rhythmic GH secretion persists in an amplitude-miniaturized version in the absence of a GHRH-R signal. The nocturnal enhancement of GH secretion is likely mediated by decreased somatostatin tone. Pulsatility of residual GH secretion may be caused by oscillations in somatostatin and/or ghrelin; it may also reflect intrinsic oscillations in somatotropes.     

Central somatostatinergic regulation of growth hormone secretion in dwarf chickens.

1. Basal circulating growth hormone (GH) concentrations in sex-linked-dwarf (SLD) chickens were unaffected by the intracerebroventricular (icv) injection of 10, 50 or 100 micrograms somatostatin (SRIF). 2. The GH response to systemic thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH; 10 micrograms/kg, iv) was, however, 'paradoxically' enhanced 20 min after icv SRIF administration. 3. A lower dose (1.0 micrograms) of SRIF had no effect on basal or TRH-induced GH release. 4. High-titre SRIF antisera (4 microliters) also had no acute effect on basal plasma GH concentrations, but augmented the GH response to TRH challenge. 5. SRIF would appear to act at central sites to modulate stimulated GH secretion in SLD chickens.     

Mutual priming effects of GHRH and arginine on GH secretion: informative procedure for evaluating GH secretory dynamics

To establish a single and reliable test for evaluating GH secretion, we examined successive GH provocation by two agents with different modes of action: GHRH and arginine (Arg). In 4 normal subjects, a bolus injection of 50 micrograms of GHRH followed by 0.5 g/kg Arg infusion after 90 min evoked two GH peaks and the priming of the GHRH potentiated Arg-induced GH peak by 88% of that by Arg alone. In contrast, Arg pretreatment suppressed the GHRH-induced GH peak to a level of 15%. This inhibitory effect of Arg priming was not recovered by an increase in the GHRH dose (100 micrograms) or by prolongation of the GHRH injection period to 180 min. During Arg infusion, plasma somatostatin (SRIH) was significantly reduced and there was a linear correlation between Arg-induced GH peaks and basal TSH levels. This suggests that GH release by Arg is mediated by suppression of hypothalamic SRIH. One subject showed a blunted GH peak in response to GHRH but a normal peak in response to Arg repeatedly, suggesting an endogenous hypertonicity of SRIH. In 4 other normal subjects, the effect of endogenous GH fluctuation on the GHRH-Arg test was examined in the morning, afternoon and evening. The GH secretory profile was fairly consistent in individuals, but in 2 of them, GH response to GHRH was exaggerated in the evening and Arg-unresponsiveness ensued. This potentiation of GH release appears to be due to an increase in endogenous GHRH secretion or a decrease in SRIH tone. The GHRH-Arg test is therefore able to evaluate GH secretory dynamics through two major mechanisms, GHRH stimulation and SRIH inhibition in a single procedure, reducing the incidence of false negative GH response to Arg.     

alpha-Glycerylphosphorylcholine administration increases the GH responses to GHRH of young and elderly subjects.

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is decreased during aging in humans and in rodents. This decrease may be due to increased hypothalamic somatostatin release, which is inhibited by cholinergic agonists, or to decreased secretion of GHRH. Alpha-glyceryl-phosphorylcholine (alpha-GFC) is a putative acetylcholine precursor used in the treatment of cognitive disorders in the elderly. In order to learn what effect alpha-GFC had on GH secretion, GH-release hormone (GHRH) was given to young and old human volunteers, with or without the addition of alpha-GFC. GH secretion was greater in the younger subjects than in the old individuals, and both groups had a greater GH response to the GHRH+alpha-GFC than to GHRH alone. The potentiating effect of alpha-GFC on GH secretion was more pronounced in the elderly subjects. These findings confirm the observation that aged individuals respond less well to GHRH than younger subjects, and provides further evidence that increased cholinergic tone enhances GH release.     

Age-related differences in growth hormone (GH) regulation during strenuous exercise.

This study was designed to investigate the central neuroendocrine mechanisms by which exercise (EX) stimulates growth hormone (GH) release as a function of age. Twelve male subjects, six in their early-to-mid twenties and six in their late sixties or seventies, received a strong GH stimulus either as incremental EX until volitional exhaustion or by administration of GHRH alone or Hex alone two hours after a presumed maximal GH response to combined administration of GHRH plus hexarelin (Hex). Total GH availability was calculated as area under the curve (AUC) over time periods 0 - 120 and 120 - 240 min. The mean AUC in micro g/l x 120 min to GHRH+Hex in the younger group was approximately twice that in the older group (11,260, range 3,947 - 19,007 vs. 5,366, range 2,262 - 8,654). In younger males, the mean AUC to EX (509, range 0 - 1,151) was larger than to GHRH (119, range 0 - 543), but less than that to Hex (919, range 0 - 1,892). In the older group, GH responses to EX and GHRH were abolished (mean AUC: 112, range 0 - 285, and 156, range 30 - 493), respectively) in contrast to the response to Hex (1,077, range 189 - 1,780). These data indicate that maximal GH stimulation by GHRH+Hex results in greater desensitization of GHRH compared to Hex, irrespective of age. We postulate that the abolished responsiveness of GH to EX in older group is due to insufficient disinhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin activity and desensitization of GHRH, while the preserved activity of a central Hex-related pathway is not involved. The GH response to EX in younger males is due to complete inhibition of somatostatin activity and stimulation of a central Hex-related pathway in spite of GHRH desensitization. We conclude that a central Hex-related pathway is the primary factor for EX-induced GH release only in younger males.     

Enhanced growth hormone responses to growth hormone releasing hormone in male type I diabetic patients.

In a previous paper we have demonstrated that growth hormone (GH) responses to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) are higher in premenopausal normal women than in age matched healthy men. As in type I diabetes mellitus various disturbances of GH secretion have been reported, the aim of our study was to assess the effect of sex on basal and GHRH stimulated GH secretion in type I diabetes mellitus. In 21 female and 23 male type I diabetic patients and 28 female and 30 male control subjects GH levels were measured before and after stimulation with GHRH (1 microgram/kg body weight i.v.) by radioimmunoassay. GH responses to GHRH were significantly higher in female than in male control subjects (p less than 0.02), whereas the GH levels following GHRH stimulation were similar in female and male type I diabetic patients. GH responses to GHRH were significantly higher in the male type I diabetic patients than in the male control subjects (p less than 0.001); in the female type I diabetic patients and the female control subjects, however, GH responses to GHRH were not statistically different. The absence of an effect of sex on GHRH stimulated GH responses in type I diabetes mellitus provides further evidence of an abnormal GH secretion in this disorder.     

Recruiting of somatotroph cells after combined somatostatin, GHRH and growth hormone (GH) secretagogue stimulation in a study of pituitary GH reserve in prepuberal female rats

Diagnostic confirmation of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in children and adults is based on stimulation tests designed to assess the pituitary reserve by measuring the amount of GH released into the bloodstream; however, the results obtained by this means cannot provide any direct indication of the amount of GH actually produced by pituitary somatotroph cells. The present paper sought to test the hypothesis that release of GH following administration of specific stimuli does not accurately reflect the somatotroph cell response, and that the amount of GH released into the bloodstream may often be greater or smaller than the amount synthesized. GH release and changes in the proportion of somatotroph cells were charted in prepuberal female Wistar rats, following administration of several different GH stimuli: GHRH (1 microg/kg), GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg), GHRELIN (1 microg/kg) and combined GHRH-based treatments, with or without SRIH pretreatment (1 microg/kg) 90 minutes earlier. Peak serum GH values were recorded 15 minutes after administration of GHRH+GHRELIN and GHRH+GHRP-6; maximum stimulation in terms of an increased proportion of somatotroph cells occurred 15 minutes after combined adminstration of GHRH + GHRELIN. SRIH pretreatment (- 90 min) inhibited GH release, with a subsequent "escape" and lack of response to stimulation which lasted at least 30 minutes except following administration of GHRH. However, combined administration of GHRH+GHRELIN maintained stimulation of the somatotroph cell population. In conclusion, the results suggest that the enhanced GH release prompted by stimulation tests used to diagnose GH deficiency in prepuberal female rats does not fully reflect somatroph cell dynamics, and that not all the GH produced and stored by somatotroph cells is released into the bloodstream.     

Somatostatin inhibition of growth hormone secretion in an adult bird: the domestic fowl

1. The intravenous (i.v.) infusion of somatostatin (SRIF, 1.0 microgram/kg per min) promptly (within 5 min) reduced the growth hormone (GH) concentration in the plasma of conscious adult chickens. 2. The GH concentration progressively declined throughout a 60-min period of SRIF infusion, but was dramatically increased above pre-infusion levels within 5 min of SRIF withdrawal and maintained at an elevated level for at least 30 min afterwards. 3. Sodium pentobarbitone-anaesthesia lowered the basal GH concentration to levels comparable with those in conscious birds infused with SRIF. When administered to anaesthetized birds, exogenous SRIF was unable to further reduce the GH concentration and unable to induce 'rebound' GH release. 4. While thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH, 10 micrograms/kg) increased the GH concentration in both conscious and anaesthetized birds, only the GH response in the anaesthetized birds was diminished by SRIF infusion. 5. Rebound GH secretion following the termination of SRIF infusion was observed in both conscious and anaesthetized birds injected with TRH. 6. These results demonstrate that SRIF can inhibit basal and TRH-stimulated GH secretion in adult domestic fowl and indicate that anaesthesia disrupts the normal control of GH releases.     

Insulin-induced hypoglycemia, L-dopa and arginine stimulate GH secretion through different mechanisms in man

We sought to clarify the mechanisms of growth hormone (GH) secretion induced by insulin hypoglycemia, L-dopa, and arginine in man. The secretion of GH as measured by increased plasma level, in response to oral administration of 500 mg L-dopa or 30 min-infusion of arginine, was not modified by prior intravenous administration of 200 micrograms GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). It was, however, completely blocked by preadministered 50 micrograms SMS201-995, a long-acting somatostatin (SRIH) analog. GH release with 200 micrograms GHRH was completely blocked by 100 micrograms SMS201-995. GH secretion caused by insulin-induced hypoglycemia was significantly reduced but still present after administration of 100 micrograms of the analog. These results suggest that a suppression of SRIH release may be partially involved in the stimulatory mechanism of GH secretion by L-dopa. Coadministration of GHRH accentuated the stimulatory effect of arginine on GH secretion. Arginine significantly raised plasma TSH levels. These findings suggest that arginine suppresses SRIH release from the hypothalamus to cause GH secretion because SRIH suppresses TSH secretion. It is also suggested that some factor (or factors) other than GHRH and SRIH are involved in the mechanism by which insulin-induced hypoglycemia stimulates GH secretion, because the effect of insulin was not fully blocked in the presence of SRIH analog. Thus all the tests for GH release appear to act via different mechanisms.     

Effects of growth hormone-releasing factor and somatostatin on growth hormone secretion and cellular cyclic AMP levels. Cultured ovine and rat anterior pituitary cells show markedly different responses

Human pancreatic growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF-44-NH2) stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion and intracellular cyclic AMP levels in cultured pituitary cells from both sheep and rat. Somatostatin (SRIF), over a wide range of doses and time, showed no significant effect on the elevated cyclic AMP levels in sheep cells, but did block the GH release in a dose-dependent manner. In rat cells, however, SRIF inhibited GRF-stimulated cyclic AMP levels by 75% maximum (still 8-fold greater than the basal levels) and GH release to almost half the basal value. We conclude that somatostatin inhibits GRF-elevated cyclic AMP levels in rat pituitary cells but not in sheep cells.     

Pertussis toxin blocks the inhibitory effects of somatostatin on cAMP-dependent vasoactive intestinal peptide and cAMP-independent thyrotropin releasing hormone-stimulated prolactin secretion of GH3 cells

It was shown that somatostatin (SRIF) inhibited cAMP-dependent vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-stimulated prolactin (PRL) release by a GH3 clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells and decreased basal PRL secretion and inhibited PRL release in response to thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) whose action was independent of prior synthesis of cAMP. Pretreatment of these cells with pertussis toxin prevented SRIF's inhibitory effects on basal and TRH-stimulated hormone secretion as well as its VIP-stimulated responses. The blockade of SRIF's inhibitory effect on the actions of TRH or VIP was dependent on both the duration of preincubation and concentration of the toxin and was correlated with the ability of the toxin to catalyze the ADP-ribosylation of the 39,000-Da membrane protein. It is likely that this pertussis toxin substrate is involved in signal transduction of SRIF on cAMP-dependent actions of VIP and cAMP-independent action of TRH. However, the mechanism of SRIF's action on TRH is not clear, since SRIF did not affect the intracellular responses by TRH, neither intracellular Ca2+ mobilization nor the increase of 1,2-diacylglycerol formation following the breakdown of polyphosphoinositides.     

Comparative effect of clonidine and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone on GH secretion in adult patients on chronic glucocorticoid therapy.

Glucocorticoids are thought to inhibit growth hormone (GH) secretion through an enhancement of endogenous somatostatin tone. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and clonidine, an alpha-2-adrenergic agonist which increases GH secretion acting at the hypothalamic level with an unknown mechanism, on GH secretion in seven adult patients (3M, 4F) with non endocrine diseases and on daily immunosuppressive glucocorticoid therapy. Eleven normal subjects (7M, 4F) served as controls. Steroid-treated patients showed a blunted GH response to GHRH (GH peak 8.3 +/- 3 micrograms/L) with respect to normal subjects (GH peak 19.3 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L). The GH responses to clonidine were also blunted (p less than 0.05) in steroid-treated patients (GH peak 5.8 +/- 2.8 micrograms/L) with respect to normal subjects (GH peak 17.6 +/- 2.3 micrograms/L). No significant differences between the GH responses to GHRH and clonidine were observed either in steroid-treated or in normal subjects. Clonidine is not able to enhance GH secretion similar to GHRH in patients chronically treated with steroids. It can be hypothesized that clonidine does not elicit GH secretion decreasing hypothalamic somatostatin tone.     

Retrovirus-mediated expression of preprosomatostatin in rat pituitary GH3 cells: targeting of somatostatin to the regulated secretory pathway

Somatostatin (SRIF) is a 14-amino acid peptide hormone that is synthesized as part of a larger precursor, prepro-SRIF, consisting of a signal peptide and a proregion of 80-90 amino acids; mature SRIF is located at the carboxyl-terminus of the precursor. We have used a recombinant retroviral expression vector encoding anglerfish prepor-SRIF-I to infect rat pituitary GH3 cells. The aim of these studies was to investigate the intracellular storage and secretion of the total pool of endogenous GH compared to that of SRIF. Several clonal lines of GH3 cells expressing high or low levels of SRIF were treated with TRH, forskolin, or depolarizing concentrations of potassium, and the levels of intracellular and secreted GH or SRIF were determined using highly sensitive RIAs. Approximately 65% of the total GH was secreted basally, whereas less than 20% of the SRIF-immunoreactive material was basally secreted. Forskolin treatment or potassium depolarization stimulated GH release, but only about 50% above basal levels. In contrast, SRIF secretion was stimulated approximately 5-fold in response to these secretagogues. Based on its lower basal rate of secretion compared to GH and its enhanced release in response to a variety of secretagogues, we conclude that the heterologously expressed SRIF is preferentially targeted to the regulated pathway in GH3 cells.