Dynein at the nuclear envelope

Most cellular organelles are positioned through active transport by motor proteins. The authors discuss the evidence that dynein has important cell cycle-regulated functions in this context at the nuclear envelope.Most cellular organelles are positioned through active transport by motor proteins. This is especially important during cell division, a time when the organelles and genetic content need to be divided equally between the two daughter cells. Although individual proteins can attain their correct location by diffusion, larger structures are usually positioned through active transport by motor proteins. The main motor that transports cargoes to the minus ends of the microtubules is dynein. In nondividing cells, dynein probably transports or positions the nucleus inside the cells by binding to the nuclear envelope (NE; Burke & Roux, 2009). However, it appears that dynein also has important cell-cycle-regulated functions at the NE, as it is recruited to the NE every cell cycle just before cells enter mitosis (Salina et al, 2002; Splinter et al, 2010). Here, we discuss why dynein might be recruited to the NE for a brief period before mitosis.During late G2 or prophase the centrosomes separate to opposite sides of the nucleus, but remain closely associated with the NE during separation. This close association is probably mediated through NE-bound dynein, which ‘walks'' towards the minus ends of centrosomal microtubules, thereby pulling centrosomes towards the NE (Splinter et al, 2010; Gonczy et al, 1999; Robinson et al, 1999). We speculate that close association of centrosomes to the NE might have several functions. First, if centrosomes are not mechanically coupled to the NE, centrosome movement during separation will occur in random directions and chromosomes will not end up between the two separated centrosomes. In this scenario, individual kinetochores might attach more frequently to microtubules coming from both centrosomes (merotelic attachments), a defect that can result in aneuploidy, a characteristic of cancer. Second, centrosome-nuclear attachment also keeps centrosomes in close proximity to chromosomes, which might facilitate rapid capture of chromosomes by microtubules nucleated by the centrosomes after NE breakdown. This might not be absolutely essential, as chromosome alignment can occur in the absence of centrosomes. However, the spatial proximity of centrosomes and chromosomes at NE breakdown might improve the fidelity of kinetochore capture and chromosome alignment.In addition, dynein has also been suggested to promote centrosome separation in prophase in some systems (Gonczy et al, 1999; Robinson et al, 1999; Vaisberg et al, 1993), although not in others (Tanenbaum et al, 2008). Perhaps dynein, anchored at the NE just before mitosis, could exert force on microtubules emanating from both centrosomes, thereby pulling centrosomes apart. However, this force could also be produced by cortical dynein and specific inhibition of NE-associated or cortical dynein will be required to test which pool is responsible.Dynein has also been implicated in the process of NE breakdown itself, by promoting mechanical shearing of the NE. Two elegant studies showed that microtubules can tear the NE as cells enter mitosis (Salina et al, 2002; Beaudouin et al, 2002). One possibility is that microtubules growing into the NE mechanically disrupt it. Alternatively, NE-associated dynein might ‘walk'' along centrosomal microtubules and thereby pull on the NE, tearing it apart. However, testing the exact role of dynein in NE breakdown is complicated by the fact that centrosomes detach from the NE on inactivation of dynein and centrosomal microtubules stop growing efficiently into the NE. Thus, selective inhibition of dynein function will also be required to test this idea.Specific recruitment of dynein to the NE just before mitosis clearly suggests a role for dynein at the NE in preparing cells for mitosis. A major role of NE-associated dynein is to maintain close association of centrosomes with the NE during centrosome separation, which might be needed for efficient capture and alignment of chromosomes after NE breakdown, but additionally, NE-associated dynein could facilitate breakdown and contribute to centrosome separation in some systems.     

Enlightening the impact of immunogenic cell death in photodynamic cancer therapy

EMBO J 31 5, 1062–1079 (2012); published online January172012In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Garg et al (2012) delineate a signalling pathway that leads to calreticulin (CRT) exposure and ATP release by cancer cells that succumb to photodynamic therapy (PTD), thereby providing fresh insights into the molecular regulation of immunogenic cell death (ICD).The textbook notion that apoptosis would always take place unrecognized by the immune system has recently been invalidated (Zitvogel et al, 2010; Galluzzi et al, 2012). Thus, in specific circumstances (in particular in response to anthracyclines, oxaliplatin, and γ irradiation), cancer cells can enter a lethal stress pathway linked to the emission of a spatiotemporally defined combination of signals that is decoded by the immune system to activate tumour-specific immune responses (Zitvogel et al, 2010). These signals include the pre-apoptotic exposure of intracellular proteins such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperon CRT and the heat-shock protein HSP90 at the cell surface, the pre-apoptotic secretion of ATP, and the post-apoptotic release of the nuclear protein HMGB1 (Zitvogel et al, 2010). Together, these processes (and perhaps others) constitute the molecular determinants of ICD.In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Garg et al (2012) add hypericin-based PTD (Hyp-PTD) to the list of bona fide ICD inducers and convincingly link Hyp-PTD-elicited ICD to the functional activation of the immune system. Moreover, Garg et al (2012) demonstrate that Hyp-PDT stimulates ICD via signalling pathways that overlap with—but are not identical to—those elicited by anthracyclines, which constitute the first ICD inducers to be characterized (Casares et al, 2005; Zappasodi et al, 2010; Fucikova et al, 2011).Intrigued by the fact that the ER stress response is required for anthracycline-induced ICD (Panaretakis et al, 2009), Garg et al (2012) decided to investigate the immunogenicity of Hyp-PDT (which selectively targets the ER). Hyp-PDT potently stimulated CRT exposure and ATP release in human bladder carcinoma T24 cells. As a result, T24 cells exposed to Hyp-PDT (but not untreated cells) were engulfed by Mf4/4 macrophages and human dendritic cells (DCs), the most important antigen-presenting cells in antitumour immunity. Similarly, murine colon carcinoma CT26 cells succumbing to Hyp-PDT (but not cells dying in response to the unspecific ER stressor tunicamycin) were preferentially phagocytosed by murine JAWSII DCs, and efficiently immunized syngenic BALB/c mice against a subsequent challenge with living cells of the same type. Of note, contrarily to T24 cells treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or dying from accidental necrosis, T24 cells exposed to Hyp-PDT activated DCs while eliciting a peculiar functional profile, featuring high levels of NO production and absent secretion of immunosuppressive interleukin-10 (IL-10) (Garg et al, 2012). Moreover upon co-culture with Hyp-PDT-treated T24 cells, human DCs were found to secrete high levels of IL-1β, a cytokine that is required for the adequate polarization of interferon γ (IFNγ)-producing antineoplastic CD8⁺ T cells (Aymeric et al, 2010). Taken together, these data demonstrate that Hyp-PDT induces bona fide ICD, eliciting an antitumour immune response.By combining pharmacological and genetic approaches, Garg et al (2012) then investigated the molecular cascades that are required for Hyp-PDT-induced CRT exposure and ATP release. They found that CRT exposure triggered by Hyp-PDT requires reactive oxygen species (as demonstrated with the ¹O₂ quencher L-histidine), class I phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) activity (as shown with the chemical inhibitor wortmannin and the RNAi-mediated depletion of the catalytic PI3K subunit p110), the actin cytoskeleton (as proven with the actin inhibitor latrunculin B), the ER-to-Golgi anterograde transport (as shown using brefeldin A), the ER stress-associated kinase PERK, the pro-apoptotic molecules BAX and BAK as well as the CRT cell surface receptor CD91 (as demonstrated by their knockout or RNAi-mediated depletion). However, there were differences in the signalling pathways leading to CRT exposure in response to anthracyclines (Panaretakis et al, 2009) and Hyp-PDT (Garg et al, 2012). In contrast to the former, the latter was not accompanied by the exposure of the ER chaperon ERp57, and did not require eIF2α phosphorylation (as shown with non-phosphorylatable eIF2α mutants), caspase-8 activity (as shown with the pan-caspase blocker Z-VAD.fmk, upon overexpression of the viral caspase inhibitor CrmA and following the RNAi-mediated depletion of caspase-8), and increased cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentrations (as proven with cytosolic Ca²⁺ chelators and overexpression of the ER Ca²⁺ pump SERCA). Moreover, Hyp-PDT induced the translocation of CRT at the cell surface irrespective of retrograde transport (as demonstrated with the microtubular poison nocodazole) and lipid rafts (as demonstrated with the cholesterol-depleting agent methyl-β-cyclodextrine). Of note, ATP secretion in response to Hyp-PDT depended on the ER-to-Golgi anterograde transport, PI3K and PERK activity (presumably due to their role in the regulation of secretory pathways), but did not require BAX and BAK (Garg et al, 2012). Since PERK can stimulate autophagy in the context of ER stress (Kroemer et al, 2010), it is tempting to speculate that autophagy is involved in Hyp-PDT-elicited ATP secretion, as this appears to be to the case during anthracycline-induced ICD (Michaud et al, 2011).Altogether, the intriguing report by Garg et al (2012) demonstrates that the stress signalling pathways leading to ICD depend—at least in part—on the initiating stimulus (Figure 1). Speculatively, this points to the coexistence of a ‘core'' ICD signalling pathway (which would be common to several, if not all, ICD inducers) with ‘private'' molecular cascades (which would be activated in a stimulus-dependent fashion). Irrespective of these details, the work by Garg et al (2012) further underscores the importance of anticancer immune responses elicited by established and experimental therapies.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Molecular mechanisms of immunogenic cell death (ICD). At least three processes underlie the immunogenicity of cell death: the pre-apoptotic exposure of calreticulin (CRT) at the cell surface, the secretion of ATP, and the post-apoptotic release of HMGB1. ICD can be triggered by multiple stimuli, including photodynamic therapy, anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and some types of radiotherapy. The signalling pathways elicited by distinct ICD inducers overlap, but are not identical. In red are indicated molecules and processes that—according to current knowledge—may be required for CRT exposure and ATP secretion in response to most, if not all, ICD inducers. The molecular determinants of the immunogenic release of HMGB1 remain poorly understood. ER, endoplasmic reticulum; P-eIF2α, phosphorylated eIF2α; PI3K, class I phosphoinositide-3-kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species.     

Split decisions: oesophageal progenitor cell behaviour

Science advance online publication July192012; doi:10.1126/science.1218835The maintenance and regeneration of continually shedding epithelial tissues that make up the linings and barriers of our bodies requires rapid and continual input of proliferative progenitor cells for tissue homeostasis. The mechanisms by which epithelial progenitors cells maintain tissues remain controversial. In a recent Science paper, Doupé et al (2012) demonstrate that a population of equivalent progenitor cells support tissue homeostasis of the oesophagus without the need for slow cycling cells as described in other rapidly dividing epithelia.In tissues such as blood and skin in which differentiated cells constantly turnover, proliferative progenitor populations are required to continually produce lost differentiated cells. Several models have been proposed to explain mechanisms by which progenitor cells contribute to tissue maintenance (Figure 1). A hierarchical model has been suggested in which longer lived stem cells, which may also cycle slowly, produce highly proliferative cells with less self-renewal potential that differentiate into a restricted number of cells. Following proliferative cells in pulse-chase experiments and genetic lineage tracing has supported a hierarchical model in the blood, epidermis and intestine (Fuchs, 2009). Alternatively, an equivalency model has been proposed in which all proliferative progenitor cells are equally able to produce proliferative and differentiated progeny in a stochastic manner. Analysis of labelled clones has supported an equivalency model for progenitors in the interfollicular epidermis and intestine (Clayton et al, 2007; Doupé et al, 2010; Snippert et al, 2010).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Two types of models have been put forward to describe the pattern of progenitor behaviour within mammalian tissues. In the hierarchical model, a stem cell can produce proliferative progenitors with less self-renewal potential that differentiate into lineage-specific cells. Alternatively, an equivalency model has been proposed that assumes equal behaviour of progenitor cells to maintain tissue homeostasis.An elevated interest in understanding the dynamics of oesophageal epithelium has resulted, in part, from the rapid increase in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (Devesa et al, 1998). The oesophagus is a stratified epithelium that lacks any appendages or glands, and thus consists of a basal layer of proliferative keratinocytes and several suprabasal layers of differentiated cells, which are continually shed. Previously, labelling of proliferative cells with DNA analogues has demonstrated that proliferation is restricted to the basal cells, which all proliferate in 5 days seemingly stochastically, supporting an equivalency model (Marques-Periera and Leblond, 1965). In contrast, studies using chimeric mice have suggested that proliferation of labelled progenitor cells occurs in a hierarchical manner (Thomas et al, 1988; Croagh et al, 2008).To address this controversy, a recent study in Science uses several genetic mouse models to define the contribution of proliferative basal cells to oesophageal homeostasis (Doupé et al, 2012). In one mouse model, the authors utilized a genetic pulse-chase system based on the tetracycline-regulated expression of the histone H2B-GFP (Tumbar et al, 2004). They find that the rapidly dividing epithelial cells of the oesophagus lose H2B-GFP expression after 4 weeks. These data suggest that either H2B-GFP is degraded (Waghmare et al, 2008) or oesophageal progenitor cells proliferate faster than their counterparts in skin epithelial appendages or blood lineages, which retain H2B-GFP after 4 weeks (Tumbar et al, 2004; Foudi et al, 2009).To analyse the properties of oesophageal progenitor cells in more detail, the authors label single cells using an inducible cre-lox genetic system and followed clones for a year. Similar to their results with this system in the tail and ear epidermis (Clayton et al, 2007; Doupé et al, 2010), the authors find that the size of the persistent clones is linear with time. Statistical analysis of the clone size data supports the ability of the cells to contribute to proliferative and non-proliferative (i.e., differentiated) progeny with equal probability. Thus, these data support a model in which all of the labelled cells are equivalent.In addition to homeostasis, the authors explore how proliferative progenitors contribute to alterations in tissue homeostasis. After inflicting wounds by biopsy, marked clones span both proliferative and non-proliferative zones of the healing oesophageal epithelium, suggesting that they maintain a progenitor fate with distinct phenotypes. With atRA treatment, the authors show that suprabasal cell formation increases, which is consistent with the known effect of atRA on the oesophagus (Lasnitzki, 1963). Statistical analysis reveals that the probability of forming basal and suprabasal cells was not altered with atRA administration. However, since proliferative cells exist in suprabasal layers during epithelial hyperplasia, additional analyses of cell state are required to determine if atRA maintains stochastic fate decisions of progenitor cells. Furthermore, the progenitor response to atRA treatment might be limited by niche space along the basement membrane like in intestinal crypt progenitor cells (Snippert et al, 2010).In summary, this study together with the authors'' previous work provides additional support for the existence of equivalent progenitor cells within stratified epithelium in several tissues. Additional studies revealing how epithelial progenitor cells behave when proliferation and differentiation are altered in the oesophagus could shed light on mechanisms for the pathogenesis of oesophageal tumours or diseases such as Barrett''s oesophagus.     

Cilia born out of shock and stress

EMBO J (2013) 32 23, 3029–3040 10.1038/emboj.2013.223; published online October112013Primary cilia are cell surface sensory organelles, whose dysfunction underlies various human genetic diseases collectively termed ciliopathies. A new study in The EMBO Journal by Villumsen et al now reveals how stress–response pathways converge to stimulate ciliogenesis by modulating protein composition of centriolar satellites. Better understanding of these mechanisms should bring us closer to identifying the cellular defects that underlie ciliopathies caused by mutations in centriolar satellite proteins.Centrioles are barrel-shaped structures with two distinct identities. In proliferating cells centrioles provide structural support for the centrosome, a key microtubule-organizing centre, whereas in quiescent cells centrioles are converted into basal bodies and promote the assembly of primary cilia. In centrosomes, centrioles are embedded in pericentriolar material (PCM), a dynamic structure responsible for microtubule nucleation. PCM proteins exhibit cell cycle-dependent localisation, achieved at least in part by the regulation of their transport. Centriolar satellites, dense fibrous granules frequently clustered around the interphase centrosome, have been implicated in microtubule-dependent protein transport to centrosomes (Kubo et al, 1999). In particular, PCM-1, the core constituent of centriolar satellites, is required for centrosomal accumulation of several PCM components (Dammermann and Merdes, 2002). Although the proteomic composition of satellites is still elusive, the growing list of satellite proteins includes CEP131/AZI1 (Staples et al, 2012), CEP290 (Stowe et al, 2012), Bardet-Biedl syndrome protein 4 (BBS4) and Oral facial digital syndrome protein (OFD1; Lopes et al, 2011). Mutations in OFD1, CEP290 and BBS4 cause ciliopathies (Kim et al, 2008), underscoring a functional link between satellites and ciliogenesis. So far, two roles have been proposed for satellites in cilia formation: First, in cycling cells they may serve to sequester essential ciliary proteins (Stowe et al, 2012). Second, upon initiation of the ciliogenesis programme, centriolar satellite components seem to promote the recruitment of specific ciliary proteins to basal bodies (Ferrante et al, 2006; Lopes et al, 2011; Stowe et al, 2012).In a new study in The EMBO Journal, Villumsen et al (2013) now describe how stress–response pathways conspire to control ciliogenesis. The authors observed that specific environmental stresses, such as ultraviolet light radiation (UV) or heat shock, but not ionizing radiation (IR), trigger rapid displacement of PCM-1, AZI1 and CEP290 from centriolar satellites. However, OFD1 remained associated with satellites, indicating that centriolar satellites persist despite UV-induced removal of PCM-1. This might come as some surprise, since PCM-1 depletion by RNA interference (RNAi) is thought to disrupt satellite integrity (Kim et al, 2008; Lopes et al, 2011); however, satellite loss upon PCM-1 RNAi may be a consequence of prolonged depletion of PCM-1, while acute PCM-1 displacement by stress might only ‘remodel'' centriolar satellites. It is also possible that not all satellites are created equal, and they do vary in protein composition (Kim et al, 2008; Staples et al, 2012). If so, UV-induced PCM-1 removal may disrupt some, but not all satellites.A good candidate regulator of centriolar satellite remodelling was the stress-activated MAP kinase p38, and indeed, Villumsen et al (2013) found p38 MAPK activity to be stimulated by both UV and heat shock but not IR in U2OS cells, mirroring those very stress pathways that also cause displacement of AZI1 and PCM-1 from satellites. Furthermore, p38 MAPK was essential for UV-induced dispersal of PCM-1 and AZI1. The authors then tested the hypothesis that stress-induced centriolar satellite remodelling could involve changes in the interactome of AZI1, and—consistent with an earlier proteomics study (Akimov et al, 2011)—identified PCM-1, CEP290 and the mindbomb E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (MIB1) as the main AZI1 binding partners. GFP-MIB1 localized to centriolar satellites and mono-ubiquitylated AZI1, PCM-1 and CEP290 in cycling cells. In response to UV, both ubiquitylation of these proteins and MIB1 activity were reduced; notably, UV-induced MIB1 inactivation was independent of p38 MAPK activity, indicating that these two enzymes may act via distinct pathways (Figure 1A).Open in a separate windowFigure 1(A) Regulation of centriolar satellite remodelling. (B) Schematic summary of how centriolar satellite remodelling might facilitate ciliogenesis. See text for details.What could be the purpose of MIB1-dependent ubiquitylation of these satellite proteins? It certainly does not seem to regulate subcellular targeting, as in MIB1-depleted cells, AZI1 and PCM-1 both localised normally to centriolar satellites and could still be displaced by UV. Instead, ubiquitylation seems to suppress the interaction between AZI1 and PCM-1, consistent with the observation that UV, a condition that also reduces their ubiquitylation, enhances the binding of AZI1 to PCM-1.PCM-1, CEP290 and AZI1 all participate in ciliogenesis (Kim et al, 2008; Wilkinson et al, 2009; Stowe et al, 2012), raising the possibility that MIB1 might also affect this process. Indeed, serum starvation, which is known to promote cilia formation, attenuated MIB1 activity. Furthermore, MIB1 overexpression reduced the ciliogenesis observed in serum-starved cells, while MIB1 depletion in proliferating cells triggered a marked increase in the proportion of cells that formed cilia; this seems to reflect a direct effect of MIB1 on ciliogenesis, since neither MIB1 depletion nor overexpression altered cell cycle progression. Taken together, downregulation of MIB1 enzymatic activity appears to be a pre-requisite for efficient ciliogenesis, regardless of whether it is triggered by physiological ciliogenesis-promoting signals or by environmental stresses, making MIB1 a novel negative regulator of cilia formation.The recent discovery of ciliopathy-associated mutations in constituents of the DNA damage response signalling pathway pointed to a connection between DNA damage and ciliogenesis (Chaki et al, 2012). With the new link between UV and centriolar satellites, the authors next asked if UV radiation might affect ciliogenesis. Remarkably, UV and heat shock both triggered cilia assembly in RPE-1 cells in a p38 MAPK-dependent manner. MIB1 depletion further enhanced ciliogenesis after UV radiation, again implying an additive effect of p38 MAPK signalling and MIB1 suppression (Figure 1A).While finer details on the precise role of centriolar satellite components in cilia formation are still lacking, a more coherent picture is finally starting to emerge. In cycling cells, ubiquitination by MIB1 could serve to limit the interaction between AZI1 and PCM-1 on centriolar satellites (Figure 1B). Under these conditions PCM-1 may bind and sequester CEP290, an essential ciliogenic protein, thereby precluding untimely cilia formation (Stowe et al, 2012). Both during normal and stress-induced ciliogenesis programs, remodelling of centriolar satellites creates a permissive environment for cilia formation, and a key step in this process is downregulation of MIB1 activity. While it remains to be established how the latter is achieved, it is clear that MIB1 inactivation causes loss of ubiquitylation and increased binding between AZI1 and PCM-1. Preferential interaction of PCM-1 with AZI1 could in turn facilitate release of CEP290 from centriolar satellites and its subsequent accumulation at the centrosome. Once CEP290 reaches the optimum concentration at the centriole/basal body, it could serve to tether AZI1–PCM-1 complexes. PCM-1 could then concentrate Rab8 GTPase near centrosomes, allowing CEP290 to recruit Rab8 into the cilium, where it acts to extend the ciliary membrane (Kim et al, 2008).Collectively, the findings reported here provide strong experimental support to the notion that centriolar satellites are negative regulators of ciliogenesis in proliferating cells. Their role is central to limit untimely formation of cilia in cells. Environmental strains elicit stress–response pathways that converge to relieve the ciliogenesis block imposed by satellites. It is tempting to speculate that stress-induced cilia might serve as signalling platforms and contribute to checkpoint activation or perhaps initiation of repair mechanisms, but more work is needed to establish the true purpose of ciliogenesis in this context. It is of considerable interest that a recent study reports that autophagy, another stress-induced pathway, selectively removes OFD1 from satellites to promote ciliogenesis (Tang et al, 2013). Therefore stress-mediated centriolar satellite remodelling seems to be an evolving theme in the control of ciliogenesis.