Hyaluronan-based polymer scaffold modulates the expression of inflammatory and degradative factors in mesenchymal stem cells: Involvement of Cd44 and Cd54

Hyaluronan (HA), in the bone marrow stroma, is the major non-protein glycosaminoglycan component of extracellular matrix (ECM) involved in cell positioning, proliferation, differentiation as well as in receptor-mediated changes in gene expression. Repair of bone and regeneration of bone marrow is dependent on ECM, inflammatory factors, like chemokines and degradative factors, like metalloproteinases. We analyzed the interaction between human mesenchymal stem cells (h-MSCs) and a three-dimensional (3-D) HA-based scaffold in vitro. The expression of CXC chemokines/receptors, CXCL8 (IL-8)/CXCR1-2, CXCL10 (IP-10)/CXCR3, CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4, and CXCL13 (BCA-1)/CXCR5, and metalloproteinases/inhibitors MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-13/TIMP-1 were evaluated in h-MSCs grown on plastic or on HA-based scaffold by Real-time PCR, ELISA, and immunocytochemical techniques. Moreover, the expression of two HA receptors, CD44 and CD54, was analyzed. We found both at mRNA and protein levels that HA-based scaffold induced the expression of CXCR4, CXCL13, and MMP-3 and downmodulated the expression of CXCL12, CXCR5, MMP-13, and TIMP-1 while HA-based scaffold induced CD54 expression but not CD44. We found that these two HA receptors were directly involved in the modulation of CXCL12, CXCL13, and CXCR5. This study demonstrates a direct action of a 3-D HA-based scaffold, widely used for cartilage and bone repair, in modulating both h-MSCs inflammatory and degradative factors directly involved in the engraftment of specific cell types in a damaged area. Our data clearly demonstrate that HA in this 3-D conformation acts as a signaling molecule for h-MSCs.     

CXCR4/CXCL12 在肿瘤中的研究进展

研究表明趋化因子及其受体在胚胎发育、干细胞迁移以及各种免疫反应中发挥重要作用,是许多生理及病理过程中细胞运动的重要因素。趋化因子受体CXCR4是一个由352个氨基酸构成的、7次跨膜的G蛋白偶联受体。趋化因子CXCL12为其特异性受体。研究发现,CXCR4/CXCL12在多种肿瘤中都有表达,在肿瘤的生长、血管生成、转移等方面发挥着重要作用。与正常组织相比,肿瘤组织及转移灶CXCR4高表达。因此,对CXCR4/CXCL12轴在肿瘤病生理中的作用机制进行进一步研究,很可能为肿瘤的治疗及对肿瘤转移的预防提供一个新的思路。我们现在就对其在肿瘤病生理中的作用做一综述。     

CXCL12 (SDF-1) and CXCL13 (BCA-1) chemokines significantly induce proliferation and collagen type I expression in osteoblasts from osteoarthritis patients

To evaluate the role of CXC chemokines CXCL8 (IL8), CXCL10 (IP-10), CXCL12 (SDF-1), and CXCL13 (BCA-1) in bone remodeling, we analyzed their effects on osteoblasts (OBs) obtained from subchondral trabecular bone tissue of osteoarthritis (OA) and post-traumatic (PT) patients. The expression of CXC receptors/ligands (CXCR1/CXCL8, CXCR2/CXCL8, CXCR3/CXCL10, CXCR4/CXCL12, and CXCR5/CXCL13) was analyzed in cultured OBs by flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry. Functional assays on CXC chemokine-treated-OBs in the presence or absence of their specific inhibitors were performed to analyze cellular proliferation and the enzymatic response to chemokine activation. The expression of chemokine ligands/receptors was also confirmed in bone tissue samples by immunohistochemical analysis. Collagen type I and alkaline phosphatase mRNA expression were analyzed on CXCL12- and CXCL13-treated OBs by real-time PCR. OBs from both OA and PT patients expressed high levels of CXCR3 and CXCR5 and lower amounts of CXCR1 and CXCR4. CXCL12 and CXCL13, only in OBs from OA patients, induced a significant proliferation that was also confirmed by specific blocking experiments. Moreover, OBs from OA patients released a higher amount of CXCL13 than those of PT patients while no differences were found for CXCL12. In the remodeling area of bone tissue samples, immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that OBs expressed CXCL12/CXCR4 and CXCL13/CXCR5 both in OA and PT samples. CXCL12 and CXCL13 upregulated collagen type I mRNA expression in OBs from OA patients. These data suggest that CXCL12 and CXCL13 may directly modulate cellular proliferation and collagen type I in OA patients, so contributing to the remodeling process that occurs in the evolution of this disease.     

Retracted: Role of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis in ovarian cancer metastasis and CXCL12–CXCR4 blockade with AMD3100 suppresses tumor cell migration and invasion in vitro

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a lethal gynecologic tumor, which brings its mortality to the head. CXCL12 and its receptor chemokine receptor 4 ( CXCR4) have been found to be highly expressed in OC and contribute to the disease progression by affecting tumor cell proliferation and invasion. Here, in this study, we aim to explore whether the blockade of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis with AMD3100 (a selective CXCR4 antagonist) has effects on the progression of OC. On the basis of the gene expression omnibus database of OC gene expression chips, the OC differentially expressed genes were screened by microarray analysis. OC (nonmetastatic and metastatic) and normal ovarian tissues were collected to determine the expressions of CXCL12 and CXCR4. A series of AMD3100, shRNA against CXCR4, and pCNS-CXCR4 were introduced to treat CAOV3 cells with the highest CXCR4 was assessed. Cell viability, apoptosis, migration, and invasion were all evaluated. The microarray analysis screened out the differential expression of CXCL12–CXCR4 in OC. CXCL12 and CXCR4 expressions were increased in OC tissues, particularly in the metastatic OC tissues. Downregulation of CXCR4 by AMD3100 or shRNA was observed to have a critical role in inhibiting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of the CAOV3 OC cell line while promoting cell apoptosis. Overexpressed CXCR4 brought significantly promoting effects on the proliferation and invasiveness of OC cells. These results reinforce that the blockade of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis with AMD3100 inhibits the growth of OC cells. The antitumor role of the inhibition of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis offers a preclinical validation of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis as a therapeutic target in OC.     

NMR structure of CXCR3 binding chemokine CXCL11 (ITAC)

CXCL11 (ITAC) is one of three chemokines known to bind the receptor CXCR3, the two others being CXCL9 (Mig) and CXCL10 (IP-10). CXCL11 differs from the other CXCR3 ligands in both the strength and the particularities of its receptor interactions: It has a higher affinity, is a stronger agonist, and behaves differently when critical N-terminal residues are deleted. The structure of CXCL11 was determined using solution NMR to allow comparison with that of CXCL10 and help elucidate the source of the differences. CXCL11 takes on the canonical chemokine fold but exhibits greater conformational flexibility than has been observed for related chemokines under the same sample conditions. Unlike related chemokines such as IP-10 and IL-8, ITAC does not appear to form dimers at millimolar concentrations. The origin for this behavior can be found in the solution structure, which indicates a beta-bulge in beta-strand 1 that distorts the dimerization interface used by other CXC chemokines.     

Towards in situ tissue repair: human mesenchymal stem cells express chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2 and CCR2, and migrate upon stimulation with CXCL8 but not CCL2

The recruitment of bone marrow CD34- mesenchymal stem- and progenitor cells (MSC) and their subsequent differentiation into distinct tissues is the precondition for in situ tissue engineering. The objective of this study was to determine the entire chemokine receptor expression profile of human MSC and to investigate their chemotactic response to the selected chemokines CCL2, CXCL8 and CXCL12. Human MSC were isolated from iliac crest bone marrow aspirates and showed a homogeneous population presenting a typical MSC-related cell surface antigen profile (CD14-, CD34-, CD44+, CD45-, CD166+, SH-2+). The expression profile of all 18 chemokine receptors was determined by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Both methods consistently demonstrated that MSC express CC, CXC, C and CX(3)C receptors. Gene expression and immunohistochemical analysis documented that MSC express chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR8, CXCR1, CXCR2 and CXCR3. A dose-dependent chemotactic activity of CXCR4 and CXCR1/CXCR2 ligands CXCL12 and CXCL8 (interleukin-8) was demonstrated using a 96-well chemotaxis assay. In contrast, the CCR2 ligand CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, MCP-1) did not recruited human MSC. In conclusion, we report that the chemokine receptor expression profile of human MSC is much broader than known before. Furthermore, for the first time, we demonstrate that human MSC migrate upon stimulation with CXCL8 but not CCL2. In combination with already known data on MSC recruitment and differentiation these are promising results towards in situ regenerative medicine approaches based on guiding of MSC to sites of degenerated tissues.     

CXCL14 is no direct modulator of CXCR4

C-X-C motif chemokine 12/C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCL12/CXCR4) signaling is involved in ontogenesis, hematopoiesis, immune function and cancer. Recently, the orphan chemokine CXCL14 was reported to inhibit CXCL12-induced chemotaxis – probably by allosteric modulation of CXCR4. We thus examined the effects of CXCL14 on CXCR4 regulation and function using CXCR4-transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells and Jurkat T cells. CXCL14 did not affect dose–response profiles of CXCL12-induced CXCR4 phosphorylation, G protein-mediated calcium mobilization, dynamic mass redistribution, kinetics of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) and ERK2 phosphorylation or CXCR4 internalization. Hence, essential CXCL12-operated functions of CXCR4 are insensitive to CXCL14, suggesting that interactions of CXCL12 and CXCL14 pathways depend on a yet to be identified CXCL14 receptor.     

Activating and inhibitory Ly49 receptors modulate NK cell chemotaxis to CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 10 and CXCL12

NK cells can migrate into sites of inflammatory responses or malignancies in response to chemokines. Target killing by rodent NK cells is restricted by opposing signals from inhibitory and activating Ly49 receptors. The rat NK leukemic cell line RNK16 constitutively expresses functional receptors for the inflammatory chemokine CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)10 (CXCR3) and the homeostatic chemokine CXCL12 (CXCR4). RNK-16 cells transfected with either the activating Ly49D receptor or the inhibitory Ly49A receptor were used to examine the effects of NK receptor ligation on CXCL10- and CXCL12-mediated chemotaxis. Ligation of Ly49A, either with Abs or its MHC class I ligand H2-D(d), led to a decrease in chemotactic responses to either CXCL10 or CXCL12. In contrast, Ly49D ligation with Abs or H2-D(d) led to an increase in migration toward CXCL10, but a decrease in chemotaxis toward CXCL12. Ly49-dependent effects on RNK-16 chemotaxis were not the result of surface modulation of CXCR3 or CXCR4 as demonstrated by flow cytometry. A mutation of the Src homology phosphatase-1 binding motif in Ly49A completely abrogated Ly49-dependent effects on both CXCL10 and CXCL12 chemotaxis, suggesting a role for Src homology phosphatase-1 in Ly49A/chemokine receptor cross-talk. Ly49D-transfected cells were pretreated with the Syk kinase inhibitor Piceatannol before ligation, which abrogated the previously observed changes in migration toward CXCL10 and CXCL12. Piceatannol also abrogated Ly49A-dependent inhibition of chemotaxis toward CXCL10, but not CXCL12. Collectively, these data suggest that Ly49 receptors can influence NK cell chemotaxis within sites of inflammation or tumor growth upon interaction with target cells.     

Myocardial Chemokine Expression and Intensity of Myocarditis in Chagas Cardiomyopathy Are Controlled by Polymorphisms in CXCL9 and CXCL10

Background

Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC), a life-threatening inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy, affects 30% of the approximately 8 million patients infected by Trypanosoma cruzi. Even though the Th1 T cell-rich myocarditis plays a pivotal role in CCC pathogenesis, little is known about the factors controlling inflammatory cell migration to CCC myocardium.

Methods and Results

Using confocal immunofluorescence and quantitative PCR, we studied cell surface staining and gene expression of the CXCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CCR7, CCR8 receptors and their chemokine ligands in myocardial samples from end-stage CCC patients. CCR5+, CXCR3+, CCR4+, CCL5+ and CXCL9+ mononuclear cells were observed in CCC myocardium. mRNA expression of the chemokines CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL17, CCL19 and their receptors was upregulated in CCC myocardium. CXCL9 mRNA expression directly correlated with the intensity of myocarditis, as well as with mRNA expression of CXCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CCR7, CCR8 and their ligands. We also analyzed single-nucleotide polymorphisms for genes encoding the most highly expressed chemokines and receptors in a cohort of Chagas disease patients. CCC patients with ventricular dysfunction displayed reduced genotypic frequencies of CXCL9 rs10336 CC, CXCL10 rs3921 GG, and increased CCR5 rs1799988CC as compared to those without dysfunction. Significantly, myocardial samples from CCC patients carrying the CXCL9/CXCL10 genotypes associated to a lower risk displayed a 2–6 fold reduction in mRNA expression of CXCL9, CXCL10, and other chemokines and receptors, along with reduced intensity of myocarditis, as compared to those with other CXCL9/CXCL10 genotypes.

Conclusions

Results may indicate that genotypes associated to reduced risk in closely linked CXCL9 and CXCL10 genes may modulate local expression of the chemokines themselves, and simultaneously affect myocardial expression of other key chemokines as well as intensity of myocarditis. Taken together our results may suggest that CXCL9 and CXCL10 are master regulators of myocardial inflammatory cell migration, perhaps affecting clinical progression to the life-threatening form of CCC.     

Chemokine receptor trio: CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 crosstalk via CXCL11 and CXCL12

Although chemokines are well established to function in immunity and endothelial cell activation and proliferation, a rapidly growing literature suggests that CXC Chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 are critical in the development and progression of solid tumors. The effect of these chemokine receptors in tumorigenesis is mediated via interactions with shared ligands I-TAC (CXCL11) and SDF-1 (CXCL12). Over the last decade, CXCR4 has been extensively reported to be overexpressed in most human solid tumors and has earned considerable attention toward elucidating its role in cancer metastasis. To enrich the existing armamentarium of anti-cancerous agents, many inhibitors of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis have emerged as additional or alternative agents for neo-adjuvant treatments and even many of them are in preclinical and clinical stages of their development. However, the discovery of CXCR7 as another receptor for CXCL12 with rather high binding affinity and recent reports about its involvement in cancer progression, has questioned the potential of “selective blockade” of CXCR4 as cancer chemotherapeutics. Interestingly, CXCR7 can also bind another chemokine CXCL11, which is an established ligand for CXCR3. Recent reports have documented that CXCR3 and their ligands are overexpressed in different solid tumors and regulate tumor growth and metastasis. Therefore, it is important to consider the interactions and crosstalk between these three chemokine receptors and their ligand mediated signaling cascades for the development of effective anti-cancer therapies. Emerging evidence also indicates that these receptors are differentially expressed in tumor endothelial cells as well as in cancer stem cells, suggesting their direct role in regulating tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this review, we will focus on the signals mediated by this receptor trio via their shared ligands and their role in tumor growth and progression.     

Gene expression profile of adult human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells stimulated by the chemokine CXCL7

A variety of chemokines has been shown to recruit human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and may be potential candidates for chemokine-based tissue regeneration approaches. The aim of our study was to determine whether the chemokine CXCL7 stimulates migration of human bone marrow-derived MSC and to analyze the effect of CXCL7 on the recruitment of MSC on the broad molecular level. Chemotaxis assays documented that high doses of CXCL7 significantly recruited MSC. Gene expression profiling using oligonucleotide microarrays showed that MSC treated with CXCL7 differentially expressed genes related to cell migration, cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling. Pathway analysis showed that CXCL7 induced the expression of all chemokines binding the interleukin (IL) receptors A and B, CXCR1 and CXCR2, as well as the IL6 signal transducer (gp130) and its ligands IL6 and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). Induction of differentially expressed chemokines CXCL1-3, CXCL5, and CXCL6 as well as LIF and gp130 in MSC by CXCL7 was verified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Immunoassay of cell culture supernatants confirmed elevated levels of the interleukins 6 and 8 in MSC upon treatment with CXCL7. Chemotaxis assays showed that interleukin 6 did not recruit MSC. In conclusion, CXCL7 significantly stimulates the migration of human MSC in vitro. Pathway analysis suggests that recruitment of human MSC by CXCL7 is supported by the induction of ligands of the interleukin 8 receptors, synergistically activating the respective signaling pathways.     

CXCL8((3-73))K11R/G31P antagonizes ligand binding to the neutrophil CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors and cellular responses to CXCL8/IL-8

We recently reported that CXCL8((3-73))K11R is a high affinity agonist of neutrophil activation and chemotactic responses. In this report we employed CXCL8((3-73))K11R as a template to generate CXCL8/IL-8 analogues with antagonist activities, using site-directed mutagenesis to introduce conservative amino acid substitutions into the first turn within the molecule's beta-pleated sheet region (G31P, P32G) and, in association with these, into the putative receptor-recognition site (T12S, H13F, F17S). We then examined their impact on the analogues' biological activities and found that a G31P substitution rendered CXCL8((3-73))K11R a high affinity antagonist of CXCL8/IL-8. The ranking (in the order of decreasing CXCL8/IL-8 antagonist activities) of the CXCL8((3-73))K11R analogues we generated was, G31P>T12S/G31P>H13F/G31P>T12S/H13F/G31P>P32G approximately T12S/P32G approximately H13F/P32G>T12S/H13F/P32G; CXCL8((3-73))K11R/F17S did not inhibit CXCL8/IL-8-dependent responses. CXCL8((3-73))K11R/G31P had no discernible agonist (beta-glucuronidase release, chemotactic) activity, but at 12.5 ng/ml it bound to purified neutrophils more avidly than did 1.25 microg/ml CXCL8/IL-8. Furthermore, CXCL8((3-73))K11R/G31P competitively antagonized the binding of CXCR1- and CXCR2-specific antibodies to these receptors. Taken together, these data thus provide further impetus to the study of the potential efficacy of CXCL8((3-73))K11R/G31P as a broad-spectrum antagonist of the ELR-CXC chemokines in experimental and clinical settings.     

The role of CXC chemokines in the transition of chronic inflammation to esophageal and gastric cancer

Chronic inflammation may increase the risk to develop cancer, for instance esophagitis or gastritis may lead to development of esophageal or gastric cancer, respectively. The key molecules attracting leukocytes to local inflammatory sites are chemokines. We here provide a systematic review on the impact of CXC chemokines (binding the receptors CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3 and CXCR4) on the transition of chronic inflammation in the upper gastrointestinal tract to neoplasia. CXCR2 ligands, including GRO-α,β,γ/CXCL1,2,3, ENA-78/CXCL5 and IL-8/CXCL8 chemoattract pro-tumoral neutrophils. In addition, angiogenic CXCR2 ligands stimulate the formation of new blood vessels, facilitating tumor progression. The CXCR4 ligand SDF-1/CXCL12 also promotes tumor development by stimulating angiogenesis and by favoring metastasis of CXCR4-positive tumor cells to distant organs producing SDF-1/CXCL12. Furthermore, these angiogenic chemokines also directly enhance tumor cell survival and proliferation. In contrast, the CXCR3 ligands Mig/CXCL9, IP-10/CXCL10 and I-TAC/CXCL11 are angiostatic and attract anti-tumoral T lymphocytes and may therefore mediate tumor growth retardation and regression. Thus, chemokines exert diverging, sometimes dual roles in tumor biology as described for esophageal and gastric cancer. Therefore extensive research is needed to completely unravel the complex chemokine code in specific cancers. Possibly, chemokine-targeted cancer therapy will have to be adapted to the individual's chemokine profile.     

The role of CXC chemokines in the transition of chronic inflammation to esophageal and gastric cancer

Chronic inflammation may increase the risk to develop cancer, for instance esophagitis or gastritis may lead to development of esophageal or gastric cancer, respectively. The key molecules attracting leukocytes to local inflammatory sites are chemokines. We here provide a systematic review on the impact of CXC chemokines (binding the receptors CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3 and CXCR4) on the transition of chronic inflammation in the upper gastrointestinal tract to neoplasia. CXCR2 ligands, including GRO-α,β,γ/CXCL1,2,3, ENA-78/CXCL5 and IL-8/CXCL8 chemoattract pro-tumoral neutrophils. In addition, angiogenic CXCR2 ligands stimulate the formation of new blood vessels, facilitating tumor progression. The CXCR4 ligand SDF-1/CXCL12 also promotes tumor development by stimulating angiogenesis and by favoring metastasis of CXCR4-positive tumor cells to distant organs producing SDF-1/CXCL12. Furthermore, these angiogenic chemokines also directly enhance tumor cell survival and proliferation. In contrast, the CXCR3 ligands Mig/CXCL9, IP-10/CXCL10 and I-TAC/CXCL11 are angiostatic and attract anti-tumoral T lymphocytes and may therefore mediate tumor growth retardation and regression. Thus, chemokines exert diverging, sometimes dual roles in tumor biology as described for esophageal and gastric cancer. Therefore extensive research is needed to completely unravel the complex chemokine code in specific cancers. Possibly, chemokine-targeted cancer therapy will have to be adapted to the individual's chemokine profile.     

C-Terminal Engineering of CXCL12 and CCL5 Chemokines: Functional Characterization by Electrophysiological Recordings

Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines comprised of 70–100 amino acids. The chemokines CXCL12 and CCL5 are the endogenous ligands of the CXCR4 and CCR5 G protein-coupled receptors that are also HIV co-receptors. Biochemical, structural and functional studies of receptors are ligand-consuming and the cost of commercial chemokines hinders their use in such studies. Here, we describe methods for the expression, refolding, purification, and functional characterization of CXCL12 and CCL5 constructs incorporating C-terminal epitope tags. The model tags used were hexahistidines and Strep-Tag for affinity purification, and the double lanthanoid binding tag for fluorescence imaging and crystal structure resolution. The ability of modified and purified chemokines to bind and activate CXCR4 and CCR5 receptors was tested in Xenopus oocytes expressing the receptors, together with a Kir3 G-protein activated K⁺ channel that served as a reporter of receptor activation. Results demonstrate that tags greatly influence the biochemical properties of the recombinant chemokines. Besides, despite the absence of any evidence for CXCL12 or CCL5 C-terminus involvement in receptor binding and activation, we demonstrated unpredictable effects of tag insertion on the ligand apparent affinity and efficacy or on the ligand dissociation. These tagged chemokines should constitute useful tools for the selective purification of properly-folded chemokines receptors and the study of their native quaternary structures.     

Adiponectin promotes human jaw bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell chemotaxis via CXCL1 and CXCL8

Adiponectin (APN) is known to promote the osteogenic differentiation of human jaw bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (h‐JBMMSCs). However, the underlying mechanism has not been fully elucidated. Previously, we showed that APN could promote h‐JBMMSC osteogenesis via APPL1‐p38 by up‐regulating osteogenesis‐related genes. Here, we aimed to determine whether APN could promote h‐JBMMSC chemotaxis through CXCL1/CXCL8. The CCK‐8, wound healing and transwell assays were used to evaluate the proliferation, migration and chemotaxis of h‐JBMMSCs with or without APN treatment. Chemotaxis‐related genes were screened using RNA‐seq, and the results were validated using real‐time PCR and ELISA. We also performed Western blot using the AMPK inhibitor, WZ4003, and the p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580, to identify the signalling pathway involved. We found that APN could promote h‐JBMMSC chemotaxis in the co‐culture transwell system. CXCL1 and CXCL8 were screened and confirmed as the up‐regulated target genes. The APN‐induced CXCL1/8 up‐regulation to promote chemotaxis could be blocked by CXCR2 inhibitor SB225002. Western blot revealed that the phosphorylation of AMPK and p38 MAPK increased in a time‐dependent manner with APN treatment. Additionally, WZ4003 and SB203580 could suppress the APN‐induced overexpression of CXCL1 and CXCL8. The results of the transwell chemotaxis assay also supported the above results. Our data suggest that APN can promote h‐JBMMSC chemotaxis by up‐regulating CXCL1 and CXCL8.     

The Cytomegalovirus UL146 Gene Product vCXCL1 Targets Both CXCR1 and CXCR2 as an Agonist

Large DNA viruses, such as herpesvirus and poxvirus, encode proteins that target and exploit the chemokine system of their host. UL146 and UL147 in the cytomegalovirus (CMV) genome encode the two CXC chemokines vCXCL1 and vCXCL2. In this study, vCXCL1 was probed against a panel of the 18 classified human chemokine receptors. In calcium mobilization assays vCXCL1 acted as an agonist on both CXCR1 and CXCR2 but did not activate or block any of the other 16 chemokine receptors. vCXCL1 was characterized and compared with CXCL1/GROα, CXCL2/GROβ, CXCL3/GROγ, CXCL5/ENA-78, CXCL6/GCP-2, CXCL7/NAP-2 and CXCL8/IL-8 in competition binding, calcium mobilization, inositol triphosphate turnover, and chemotaxis assays using CXCR1- and CXCR2-expressing Chinese hamster ovary, 300.19, COS7, and L1.2 cells. The affinities of vCXCL1 for the CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors were 44 and 5.6 nm, respectively, as determined in competition binding against radioactively labeled CXCL8. In calcium mobilization, phosphatidylinositol turnover, and chemotaxis assays, vCXCL1 acted as a highly efficacious activator of both receptors, with a rather low potency for the CXCR1 receptor but comparable with CXCL5 and CXCL7. It is suggested that CMV uses the UL146 gene product expressed in infected endothelial cells to attract neutrophils by activating their CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors, whereby neutrophils can act as carriers of the virus to uninfected endothelial cells. In that way a lasting pool of CMV-infected endothelial cells could be maintained.     

IL-8/CXCL8 and growth-related oncogene alpha/CXCL1 induce chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation

Foci of chondrocyte hypertrophy that commonly develop in osteoarthritic (OA) cartilage can promote dysregulated matrix repair and pathologic calcification in OA. The closely related chemokines IL-8/CXCL8 and growth-related oncogene alpha (GROalpha)/CXCL1 and their receptors are up-regulated in OA cartilage chondrocytes. Because these chemokines regulate leukocyte activation through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, a pathway implicated in chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation, we tested whether IL-8 and GROalpha promote chondrocyte hypertrophy. We observed that normal human and bovine primary articular chondrocytes expressed both IL-8Rs (CXCR1, CXCR2). IL-8 and the selective CXCR2 ligand GROalpha (10 ng/ml) induced tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression, markers of hypertrophy (type X collagen and MMP-13 expression, alkaline phosphatase activity), as well as matrix calcification. IL-8 and the selective CXCR2 ligand GROalpha also induced increased transamidation activity of chondrocyte transglutaminases (TGs), enzymes up-regulated in chondrocyte hypertrophy that have the potential to modulate differentiation and calcification. Under these conditions, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway signaling mediated induction of both type X collagen and TG activity. Studies using mouse knee chondrocytes lacking one of the two known articular chondrocyte-expressed TG isoenzymes (TG2) demonstrated that TG2 was essential for murine GROalpha homologue KC-induced TG activity and critically mediated induction by KC of type X collagen, matrix metalloproteinase-13, alkaline phosphatase, and calcification. In conclusion, IL-8 and GROalpha induce articular chondrocyte hypertrophy and calcification through p38 and TG2. Our results suggest a novel linkage between inflammation and altered differentiation of articular chondrocytes. Furthermore, CXCR2 and TG2 may be sites for intervention in the pathogenesis of OA.