Cyclin D1 binds the androgen receptor and regulates hormone-dependent signaling in a p300/CBP-associated factor (P/CAF)-dependent manner

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-regulated member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. The cyclin D1 gene product, which encodes the regulatory subunit of holoenzymes that phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (pRB), promotes cellular proliferation and inhibits cellular differentiation in several different cell types. Herein the cyclin D1 gene product inhibited ligand-induced AR- enhancer function through a pRB-independent mechanism requiring the cyclin D1 carboxyl terminus. The histone acetyltransferase activity of P/CAF (p300/CBP associated factor) rescued cyclin D1-mediated AR trans-repression. Cyclin D1 and the AR both bound to similar domains of P/CAF, and cyclin D1 displaced binding of the AR to P/CAF in vitro. These studies suggest cyclin D1 binding to the AR may repress ligand-dependent AR activity by directly competing for P/CAF binding.     

FOXM1c is activated by cyclin E/Cdk2, cyclin A/Cdk2, and cyclin A/Cdk1, but repressed by GSK-3alpha

Two different inhibitory domains, N-terminus and central domain, keep FOXM1c almost inactive despite its strong transactivation domain. Here, we demonstrate that cyclin E/Cdk2, cyclin A/Cdk2, and cyclin A/Cdk1 activate FOXM1c. Cyclin E/Cdk2 does not target its transactivation domain or its DNA-binding domain. Instead, its activating effect strictly depends on the presence of either the central domain or the N-terminus of FOXM1c and thus is completely lost if both inhibitory domains are deleted. Cyclin E/Cdk2 activates FOXM1c by releasing its transactivation domain from the repression by these two inhibitory domains. However, it does not directly increase the transactivation potential of the TAD. The DNA-binding is not affected by cyclin E/Cdk2, neither directly nor indirectly. These two activating effects of cyclin E/Cdk2 via central domain and N-terminus are additive. Cyclin A/Cdk2 and cyclin A/Cdk1 show similar characteristics. GSK-3alpha, another proliferation-associated kinase, represses FOXM1c.     

Isolation and characterization of androgen receptor mutant,AR(M749L), with hypersensitivity to 17-beta estradiol treatment

Estrogens, primarily 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), may play important roles in male physiology via the androgen receptor (AR). It has already been shown that E(2) modulates AR function in LNCaP prostate cancer cells and xenograft CWR22 prostate cancer tissues. Using a molecular model of E(2) bound-AR-ligand binding domain (LBD) and employing site-directed mutagenesis strategies, we screened several AR mutants that were mutated at E(2)-AR contact sites. We found a mutation at amino acid 749, AR(M749L), which confers AR hypersensitivity to E(2). The reporter assays demonstrate that E(2) can function, like androgen, to induce AR(M749L) transactivation. This E(2)-induced AR mutant transactivation is a direct effect of the AR(M749L), because the transactivation was blocked by antiandrogens. The hypersensitivity of AR(M749L) to E(2) is not due to increased affinity of AR(M749L) for E(2), rather it may be due to the existence of the proper conformation necessary to maintain E(2) binding to the AR-LBD long enough to result in E(2)-induced transactivation. AR(M749L) transactivation can be further enhanced in the presence of AR coregulators, such as ARA70 and SRC-1. Therefore, amino acid 749 may represent an important site within the AR-LBD that is involved in interaction with E(2) that, when mutated, allows E(2) induction of AR transactivation.     

Cyclin D1: mechanism and consequence of androgen receptor co-repressor activity.

Androgen receptor regulation is pivotal for prostate growth and development. Activation of the receptor is dictated by association with androgen (ligand) and through interaction with co-activators and co-repressors. We have shown previously that cyclin D1 functions as a co-repressor to inhibit ligand-dependent androgen receptor activation. We demonstrate that cyclin D1 directly binds the N terminus of the androgen receptor and that this interaction is independent of ligand. Furthermore, we show that the interaction occurs in the nucleus and does not require the LXXLL motif of cyclin D1. Although two distinct transactivation domains exist in the N terminus (AF-1 and AF-5), the data shown support the hypothesis that cyclin D1 targets the AF-1 transactivation function. The constitutively active AF-5 domain was refractory to cyclin D1 inhibition. By contrast, cyclin D1 completely abolished androgen receptor activity, even in the presence of potent androgen receptor co-activators. This action of cyclin D1 at least partially required de-acetylase activity. Finally, we show that transient, ectopic expression of cyclin D1 results in reduced cell cycle progression in androgen-dependent LNCaP cells independent of CDK4 association. Collectively, our data support a model wherein cyclin D1 has a mitogenic (CDK4-dependent) function and an anti-mitogenic function (dependent on regulation of the AF-1 domain) that can collectively control the rate of androgen-dependent cellular proliferation. These findings provide insight into the non-cell cycle functions of cyclin D1 and provide the impetus to study its pleiotropic effects in androgen-dependent cells, especially prostatic adenocarcinomas.     

The amino terminus of the human AR is target for corepressor action and antihormone agonism

Antiandrogens inhibit the ligand-induced transactivation by the androgen receptor (AR) and have a widespread use in the treatment of prostate cancer but their mode of action is not fully understood. Here we show that the ability of the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate (CPA) to inhibit transactivation by the human AR (hAR) involves the corepressor SMRT (silencing mediator for retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor). We detect binding of SMRT to hAR when treating with the antiandrogen CPA, but not with the antihormones casodex or hydroxyflutamide. Interestingly, we find that SMRT binds to the N terminus of the hAR. Thereby, SMRT modulates the activity of hAR in receptor-negative CV1 cells. In addition, we have used receptor point mutants that exhibit normal transactivation potential and unchanged partial agonistic activity when treated with CPA, but lack both SMRT binding and SMRT-mediated inhibition of CPA-bound AR. This indicates that mechanisms involved in hAR-mediated transactivation are distinct from antihormone-induced receptor inactivation. Furthermore, we show that treatment of transfected cells with a cAMP analog or coexpression of the catalytic subunit of PKA, known to activate hAR, inhibits the binding of SMRT to the AR. This suggests that the association of SMRT with hAR is regulated at the level of cross-talk mechanisms and that ligand-independent receptor activation is due to corepressor dissociation. Taken together, we provide novel insights in AR regulation, antihormone action, and functional nuclear receptor-corepressor interaction.     

Androgen Suppresses the Proliferation of Androgen Receptor-Positive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells via Inhibition of Cdk2, CyclinA,and Skp2

The majority of prostate cancer (PCa) patient receiving androgen ablation therapy eventually develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We previously reported that androgen treatment suppresses Skp2 and c-Myc through androgen receptor (AR) and induced G1 cell cycle arrest in androgen-independent LNCaP 104-R2 cells, a late stage CRPC cell line model. However, the mechanism of androgenic regulation of Skp2 in CRPC cells was not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the androgenic regulation of Skp2 in two AR-positive CRPC cell line models, the LNCaP 104-R1 and PC-3^AR Cells. The former one is an early stage androgen-independent LNCaP cells, while the later one is PC-3 cells re-expressing either wild type AR or mutant LNCaP AR. Proliferation of LNCaP 104-R1 and PC-3^AR cells is not dependent on but is suppressed by androgen. We observed in this study that androgen treatment reduced protein expression of Cdk2, Cdk7, Cyclin A, cyclin H, Skp2, c-Myc, and E2F-1; lessened phosphorylation of Thr14, Tyr15, and Thr160 on Cdk2; decreased activity of Cdk2; induced protein level of p27^Kip1; and caused G1 cell cycle arrest in LNCaP 104-R1 cells and PC-3^AR cells. Overexpression of Skp2 protein in LNCaP 104-R1 or PC-3^AR cells partially blocked accumulation of p27^Kip1 and increased Cdk2 activity under androgen treatment, which partially blocked the androgenic suppressive effects on proliferation and cell cycle. Analyzing on-line gene array data of 214 normal and PCa samples indicated that gene expression of Skp2, Cdk2, and cyclin A positively correlates to each other, while Cdk7 negatively correlates to these genes. These observations suggested that androgen suppresses the proliferation of CRPC cells partially through inhibition of Cyclin A, Cdk2, and Skp2.     

Interaction between AR signalling and CRKL bypasses casodex inhibition in prostate cancer

The underlying mechanism of failed androgen ablation therapy is unknown. It is recognised that under therapeutic conditions the androgen receptor (AR) remains functionally active independent of hormone stimulation and may function through an alternative pathway. We report a novel cooperative interaction between CRKL (an intracellular signalling adaptor protein) and the AR. We demonstrate by biochemical and genetic approaches that CRKL is associated with the AR complex and is localised in the nucleus of prostate cancer cells and patient tissue biopsies. The interaction between CRKL and the AR is functionally relevant as demonstrated by its presence on the enhancer region of an androgen regulated gene (human Kallikrein-2), its upregulation of PSA, and reduction in AR transactivation following its disruption by siRNA knockdown. In the presence of the AR inhibitor casodex, the expression of CRKL co-stimulated by growth factors is able to rescue AR activity independent of hormone. Our data provides insight on how a non-nuclear factor such as CRKL may interact with the AR complex to bypass hormone dependency by using an alternative growth factor signalling pathway in advanced prostate cancer.     

Proteasome activity is required for androgen receptor transcriptional activity via regulation of androgen receptor nuclear translocation and interaction with coregulators in prostate cancer cells

Upon binding to androgen, the androgen receptor (AR) can translocate into the nucleus and bind to androgen response element(s) to modulate its target genes. Here we have shown that MG132, a 26 S proteasome inhibitor, suppressed AR transactivation in an androgen-dependent manner in prostate cancer LNCaP and PC-3 cells. In contrast, MG132 showed no suppressive effect on glucocorticoid receptor transactivation. Additionally, transfection of PSMA7, a proteasome subunit, enhanced AR transactivation in a dose-dependent manner. The suppression of AR transactivation by MG132 may then result in the suppression of prostate-specific antigen, a well known marker used to monitor the progress of prostate cancer. Further mechanistic studies indicated that MG132 may suppress AR transactivation via inhibition of AR nuclear translocation and/or inhibition of interactions between AR and its coregulators, such as ARA70 or TIF2. Together, our data suggest that the proteasome system plays important roles in the regulation of AR activity in prostate cancer cells and may provide a unique target site for the development of therapeutic drugs to block androgen/AR-mediated prostate tumor growth.     

A differential ligand-mediated response of green fluorescent protein-tagged androgen receptor in living prostate cancer and non-prostate cancer cell lines.

Androgen has been shown to promote the proliferation of prostate cancer through the action of the androgen receptor (AR). Mutation (T877A) of the AR gene found in an androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP, has been postulated to be involved in hypersensitivity and loss of specificity for androgen. In the present study, trafficking of AR and AR (T877A) in living prostate and non-prostate cancer cell lines under high and low concentrations of androgen and antiandrogen was investigated by tagging green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the receptors. In the presence of a high concentration of androgen, AR-GFP localized in the nucleus by forming discrete clusters in all cell lines. AR (T877A)-GFP was also translocated to the nucleus in LNCaP and COS-1 cells by the addition of a high concentration of androgen. In contrast, in the presence of a low concentration of androgen, the translocation of AR-GFP and AR (T877A)-GFP was observed in LNCaP cells, but not in COS-1 cells. Upon the addition of antiandrogen, AR-GFP was translocated to the nucleus but did not form subnuclear foci in both COS-1 and LNCaP cells, whereas AR (T877A)-GFP in both cells was translocated to the nucleus with subnuclear foci. The present study demonstrates the differential response of nuclear trafficking of AR and its mutant in prostate cancer cell lines and COS cells, and the subcellular and subnuclear compartmentalization provide important information on the sensitivity of the AR mutation.