Identification of three muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat lung using binding studies with selective antagonists

Heterogeneity of the muscarinic receptor population in the rat central and peripheral lung was found in competition binding experiments against [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate [( 3H]QNB) using the selective antagonists pirenzepine, AF-DX 116 and hexahydrosiladifenidol (HHSiD). Pirenzepine displaced [3H]QNB with low affinity from preparations of central airways indicating the absence of M1 receptors in the trachea and bronchi. Muscarinic receptors in the central airways are comprised of both M2 and M3 receptors since AF-DX 116, an M2-selective antagonist, bound with high affinity to 70% of the available sites while HHSiD, an M3-selective antagonist bound with high affinity to the remaining binding sites. In the peripheral lung, pirenzepine bound with high affinity to 14% of the receptor population, AF-DX 116 bound with high affinity to 79% of the binding sites while HHSiD bound with high affinity to 18% of the binding sites. The presence of M1 receptors in the peripheral airways but not in the central airways was confirmed using [3H]telenzepine, an M1 receptor ligand. [3H]Telenzepine showed specific saturable binding to 8% of [3H]QNB labeled binding sites in homogenates of rat peripheral lung, while there was no detectable specific binding in homogenates of rat trachea or heart. The results presented here demonstrate that there are three muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat lungs, and that the distribution of the different subtypes varies within the lungs. Throughout the airways, the dominant muscarinic receptor subtype is M2. In the trachea and bronchi the remaining receptors are M3, while in the peripheral lungs, the remaining receptors are both M1 and M3.     

In vitro and in vivo antimuscarinic effects of (-)cis 2,3-dihydro-3-(4-methylpiperazinylmethyl)-2-phenyl-1,5 benzothiazepin-4-(5H)one HCl (BTM-1086) in guinea pig peripheral tissues

The potency and selectivity of (-)cis-2,3-dihydro-3-(4-methylpiperazinylmethyl)-2-phenyl-1,5 benzothiazepin-4-(5H)one HCl (BTM-1086) for muscarinic receptor subtypes was compared in functional assay systems, in guinea pig peripheral tissues, to known reference drugs: atropine (nonselective), pirenzepine (M1), AF-DX 116 (M2) and HHSiD (M3). Like atropine, BTM-1086 was a potent, nonselective, competitive muscarinic antagonist with no detectable antispasmodic activity in urinary bladder or ileal muscle. In vivo, in the guinea pig cystometrogram, BTM-1086 depressed intravesical bladder pressure (PvesP) with the same efficacy and potency as oxybutynin, a drug used clinically for the treatment of urinary incontinence. The pharmacological profile of BTM-1086, however, suggests that it may not be suitable for development for bladder dysfunction disorders.     

Characterization of the subtype of muscarinic receptor coupled to the stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis in 132-1N1 human astrocytoma cells.

Stimulation of muscarinic receptors increases phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis in 132-1N1 human astrocytoma cells. To evaluate the subtype of receptors which mediate PI hydrolysis in 132-1N1 cells, the effects of: a) the nonselective M1 agonist, carbachol; b) the selective M1 agonist, 4-hydroxy-2-butynyl-trimethylammonium chloride-m-chlorocarbinilate (McN-343); c) the nonselective antagonists, atropine and scopolamine; d) the relatively selective M1 antagonist, pirenzepine; e) the relatively selective M2 antagonists, AF-DX 116 (11-2-diethylaminomethyl-1-piperidinylacetyl-5, 11-dihydro-6H-pyrido-2,3-b-1,4-benzodiazepine-6-one) and methoctramine and f) the relatively selective M3 antagonist, hexahydrosila-difenidol (HHSiD) on PI hydrolysis in 132-1N1 cells were studied. The cell pools of inositol-phospholipids were prelabelled by incubating 132-1N1 cells in a low inositol containing medium (CMRL-1066) supplemented with [3H]inositol (2 microCi/ml) for 20-24 hours at 37 degrees C. The cells were washed and resuspended in a physiological salt solution, and PI hydrolysis was measured by accumulation of [3H]inositol-1-phosphate (IP) in the presence of 10 mM LiCl. Carbachol produced time and concentration dependent PI hydrolysis (EC50, 37 microM). McN-A343 did not cause significant hydrolysis of PI in 132-1N1 cells indicating that the receptor was not of M1 type. All the above muscarinic antagonists caused a concentration dependent decrease in the level of IP in response to carbachol (100 microM). The rank order of their affinities (pA2 values) was: atropine (8.8) > HHSiD (7.6) > pirenzepine (6.8) > methoctramine (6.0) > AF-DX 116 (5.8). This rank order supports the concept that M3 (other names, M2 beta, glandular M2) receptors are linked to PI hydrolysis in 132-1N1 cells. HHSiD, which is selective for M3 receptors of the smooth muscle has higher affinity for muscarinic receptors in 132-1N1 cells than AF-DX 116 which is selective for M2 receptors in cardiac tissue. If the receptor in 132-1N1 cells had been M2, part of the rank order for affinities would have been methoctramine > AF-DX 116 > HHSiD > pirenzepine. From all of these observations, the muscarinic receptor for PI hydrolysis in 132-1N1 cells is tentatively characterized as of M3 type.     

Subtype of muscarinic receptor coupled to the attenuation of hormone-stimulated cAMP accumulation in NG108-15 neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cells.

The subtype of muscarinic receptor which mediates cAMP attenuation is not established. Therefore, several selective muscarinic antagonists were used to characterize the subtype of muscarinic receptor coupled to the inhibition of hormone-stimulated cAMP accumulation using NG108-15 neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cells. These cells were prelabeled with [2-3H]-adenine, washed, and resuspended in a culture medium containing the phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (0.5 mM). The labeled cells were preincubated with the different antagonists 12-15 min. before they were challenged with agonists. The formation of [3H]-cAMP was activated by PGE1 (1 microM) or forskolin (1 microM). In all cases, [3H]-cAMP formed was separated and measured. Carbachol (100 microM) and McN-A343 (10 mM) were used as standard muscarinic agonists. These studies gave the following results: a) McN-A343 (10 mM), an M1 receptor agonist, was only a partial agonist causing 40% inhibition of cAMP accumulation indicating that this effect was not mediated by an M1 receptor; b) The M1-selective antagonist, pirenzepine, exhibited low affinity (pA2 6.2) further suggesting that an M1 receptor was not coupled to the attenuation of cAMP accumulation; c) Two selective M2 antagonists (AF-DX 116 and methoctramine) and M3 antagonist (HHSiD) were used to further characterize these muscarinic receptors. The order of all antagonists based on their affinities (pA2 values) could be arranged in the following order: atropine (9.0) > methoctramine (7.6) > HHSiD (6.9) > AF-DX 116 (6.6) > pirenzepine (6.2). HHSiD exhibits the same degree of affinity to M2 receptors of other tissues as it does to those of NG cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Stereoselectivity at muscarinic receptor subtypes: observations with the enantiomers of phenglutarimide

The affinity of the enantiomers of phenglutarimide at three muscarinic receptor subtypes was examined in vitro using field-stimulated rabbit vas deferens (M1 receptors) and guinea pig atria (M2 alpha receptors) and ileum (M2 beta receptors). Extremely high stereoselectivity was observed and higher affinities (up to 6000-fold) were found for the (+)-S-enantiomer. The stereoselectivity ratios were different at the three subtypes, and the stereochemical demands made by the muscarinic receptors were most stringent at M1 receptors. (+)-(S)-Phenglutarimide was found to be a potent M1-selective antagonist (pA2 at M1 = 8.53). Its receptor selectivity profile is qualitatively similar to that of pirenzepine. (-)-(R)-Phenglutarimide showed no comparable discriminatory properties.     

Muscarinic receptors on nerves and muscles in opossum esophagus muscularis mucosa

The muscarinic receptors of muscularis mucosa have some recognition properties that suggest they resemble receptors of the M1 subtype. The nerves of these tissues also contain muscarinic receptors which inhibit tonic contractions caused by release of a substance-P-like material by field stimulation. These receptors also appear to be M1 in type as they are maximally activated by McNeil A343 as well as by carbachol (pD2, 5.5 and 7.5, respectively). They are also inhibited by pirenzepine, as well as by atropine (negative logarithms of the required dose for 50% inhibition or potentiation, 6.6-6.7 compared with 8.2-8.3). Hexahydrosiladifenidol, an antagonist selective or M2 receptors of guinea pig ileum, had a low (approximately 7.1) pA2 value for antagonism of both agonists in smooth muscle in this tissue. However, it was closer to atropine in potency with respect to potentiating tonic responses to field stimulation or to inhibiting phasic responses to field stimulation than it was to antagonizing smooth muscle contractions. Thus, atropine was about 40 times more potent than pirenzepine and 2-5 times more potent than hexahydrosilafenidol. There were some quantitative differences in the effectiveness of these three antagonists in blocking the phasic (acetylcholine-mediated) response to field stimulation. Atropine was 70-100 times more potent than pirenzepine and 8-25 times more potent than hexahydrosiladifenidol. This greater potency difference for inhibition of phasic contractions compared with potentiation of tonic contractions was discussed. This tissue appears to be one of the first smooth muscles in which both nerves and muscles contain muscarinic receptors with some recognition properties resembling those of the M1 subtype.     

Selective interaction of tricyclic antidepressants with a subclass of rat brain cholinergic muscarinic receptors

Experiments were undertaken to determine whether the anticholinergic actions of tricyclic antidepressants are mediated by a selective interaction with a subclass of muscarinic receptors. To this end, the potencies of these antidepressants to inhibit [3H]-QNB binding to rat brain cerebral cortical membranes was compared to their potencies as antagonists of carbachol-stimulated inositol phosphate accumulation in cerebral cortical slices and carbachol-induced inhibition of GTP-stimulated adenylate cyclase in striatal membranes. Whereas amitriptyline was more potent than pirenzepine, a selective muscarinic M1 receptor antagonist, in competing for [3H]-QNB binding sites and as an antagonist of carbachol-induced inhibition of adenylate cyclase, pirenzepine was substantially more active (ten-fold) than amitriptyline in blocking carbachol-stimulated phosphatidyl inositol turnover. Atropine was more potent than all other agents in these assays, failing to display any significant degree of selectivity. The results suggest that the tricyclic antidepressants, in particular amitriptyline, appear to be selective antagonists for muscarinic receptors associated with adenylate cyclase in striatal membranes. Given the current classification of cholinergic receptors, these findings indicate that the tricyclic antidepressants may be useful for defining the properties of M2 receptors in brain.     

Affinity profile of the novel muscarinic antagonist, guanylpirenzepine

The study reports the functional affinity of an amidino derivative of pirenzepine, guanylpirenzepine, for muscarinic receptors mediating relaxation of rat duodenum, inhibition of rabbit vas deferens twitch contraction (both receptors previously classified as M1), guinea pig negative inotropism (M2) and ileal contraction (M3). Unlike pirenzepine, guanylpirenzepine discriminated between duodenum and vas deferens receptors, with a 30-fold greater affinity for the former subtype. The unique selectivity pattern of guanylpirenzepine (duodenum greater than vas deferens greater than ileum greater than atrium) renders it a promising tool for the classification of muscarinic receptor subtypes.     

Design, synthesis and binding at cloned muscarinic receptors of N-[5-(1'-substituted-acetoxymethyl)-3-oxadiazolyl] and N-[4-(1'-substituted-acetoxymethyl)-2-dioxolanyl] dialkyl amines

Few muscarinic antagonists differentiate between the M4 and M2 muscarinic receptors. In a structure activity study, aimed at discovering leads for the development of a M4 muscarinic receptor-selective antagonist, we have synthesized and tested at cloned muscarinic receptors the binding of a group of dioxolane- or oxadiazole-dialkyl amines, and compared them to our compound 1, which contains the furan nucleus. Although none of these agents were particularly potent at M4 receptors (Kd values were typically 30-70 nM), furan derivatives (-)1 and (+)1 were significantly more potent at M4 receptors than at M2 receptors (approximately 3- and 4-fold, respectively). The dioxolane derivatives 12b and 12c were more than 10-fold selective for the M4 versus the M2 receptors, while the dioxolane derivative 12e was 15-fold more potent at M4 receptors than for M2 receptors. However, these agents bound to M3 receptors with potencies like that for the M4 receptor, so they are not M4-selective. The M4/M2 relative selectivities of some of our compounds are similar to the better hexahydrosiladifenidol derivatives, and may provide some important structural clues for the development of potent and selective M4 antagonists.     

Species differences in structure-activity relationships of adenosine agonists and xanthine antagonists at brain A1 adenosine receptors

A series of 28 adenosine analogs and 17 xanthines has been assessed as inhibitors of binding of N6-R-[3H]phenylisopropyladenosine binding to A1 adenosine receptors in membranes from rat, calf, and guinea pig brain. Potencies of N6-alkyl- and N6-cycloalkyladenosines are similar in the different species. However, the presence of an aryl or heteroaryl moiety in the N6 substituent results in marked species differences with certain such analogs being about 30-fold more potent at receptors in calf than in guinea pig brain. Potencies at receptors in rat brain are intermediate. Conversely, 2-chloroadenosine and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine are about 10-fold less potent at receptors in calf brain than in guinea pig brain. Potencies of xanthines, such as theophylline, caffeine and 1,3-dipropylxanthine are similar in the different species. However, the presence of an 8-phenyl or 8-cycloalkyl substituent results in marked species differences. For example, a xanthine amine conjugate of 1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine is 9-fold more potent at receptors in calf than in rat brain and 110-fold more potent in calf than in guinea pig brain. Such differences indicate that brain A1 adenosine receptors are not identical in recognition sites for either agonists or antagonists in different mammalian species.     

Pharmacologic characterization of muscarinic receptors of insect brains.

Muscarinic receptors in brain membranes from honey bees, houseflies, and the American cockroach were identified by their specific binding of the non-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]QNB) and the displacement of this binding by agonists as well as subtype-selective antagonists, using filtration assays. The binding parameters, obtained from Scatchard analysis, indicated that insect muscarinic receptors, like those of mammalian brains, had high affinities for [3H]QNB (KD = 0.47 nM in honey bees, 0.17 nM in houseflies and 0.13 nM in the cockroach). However, the receptor concentration was low (108, 64.7, and 108 fmol/mg protein for the three species, respectively). The association and dissociation rates of [3H]QNB binding to honey bee brain membranes, sensitivity of [3H]QNB binding to muscarinic agonists, and high affinity for atropine were also features generally similar to muscarinic receptors of mammalian brains. In order to further characterize the three insect brain muscarinic receptors, the displacement of [3H]QNB binding by subtype-selective antagonists was studied. The rank order of potency of pirenzepine (PZ), the M1 selective antagonist, 11-[2-[dimethylamino)-methyl)1-piperidinyl)acetyl)-5,11- dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b)-(1,4)-benzodiazepin-6 one (AF-DX 116), the M2-selective antagonist, and 4-DAMP (4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide) the M3-selective antagonist, was also the same as that of mammalian brains, i.e., 4-DAMP greater than PZ greater than AF-DX 116. The three insect brain receptors had 27-50-fold lower affinity for PZ (Ki 484-900 nM) than did the mammalian brain receptor (Ki 16 nM), but similar to that reported for the muscarinic receptor subtype cloned from Drosophila. Also, the affinity of insect receptors for 4-DAMP (Ki 18.9-56.6 nM) was much lower than that of the M3 receptor, which predominates in rat submaxillary gland (Ki of 0.37 nM on [3H]QNB binding). These drug specificities of muscarinic receptors of brains from three insect species suggest that insect brains may be predominantly of a unique subtype that is close to, though significantly different from, the mammalian M3 subtype.     

Disruption of Potential α-Helix in the G Loop of the Guinea: Pig 5-Hydroxytryptamine2 Receptor Does Not Prevent Receptor Coupling to Phosphoinositide Hydrolysis

Abstract: Heterogeneity of the 5-hydroxytryptamine₂ (5-HT₂) receptor across species has been implicated in several pharmacological and physiological studies. Although 5-HT₂ receptors in the rat have been linked to increases in Phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, little evidence exists to support the association of guinea pig 5-HT₂ receptors with Pl hydrolysis, the second messenger generally linked with 5-HT₂receptors. In the present study, we have taken a molecular and biochemical approach to determining whether species differences in brain 5-HT₂ receptors exist between rat and guinea pig. First, we isolated partial cortical 5-HT_a receptor cDNA clones that encompassed the third intracellular loop, a receptor area putatively important in receptor-effector coupling. The amino acid sequences deduced from the cDNA clones for rat and guinea pig brain 5-HT₂ receptor were 97% homologous. However, the guinea pig 5-HT₂ receptor had two tandem substitutions that disrupted a potential alpha helix in the region of the third cytoplasmic loop, which theoretically could alter the intracellular coupling of the guinea pig cortical 5-HT₂ receptor. Because of these molecular differences, we examined further the pharmacological activation of the brain 5-HT₂ receptor from guinea pig. 5-HT and the 5-HT₂ receptor agonist α-methyl-5-HT increased PI hydrolysis in guinea pig cortical slices whereas the 5-HT_1c receptor agonist 5-methyltryptamine was significantly less potent. In addition, the 5-HT₂ receptor antagonists LY53857, ketanserin, and spiperone blocked 5-HT-stimulated Pl hydrolysis. These pharmacological data suggested that activation of the 5-HT₂ receptor in guinea pig cortical slices was associated with PI hydrolysis. Thus, although areas of the guinea pig brain 5-HT₂ receptor that influence receptor-effector coupling were different from the rat, such differences were not critical to receptor-effector coupling because, as in the rat, guinea pig brain 5-HT₂ receptors were also coupled to PI hydrolysis.     

Cloned M1 muscarinic receptors mediate both adenylate cyclase inhibition and phosphoinositide turnover

The rat M1 muscarinic receptor gene was cloned and expressed in a rat cell line lacking endogenous muscarinic receptors. Assignment of the cloned receptors to the M1 class was pharmacologically confirmed by their high affinity for the M1-selective muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine and low affinity for the M2-selective antagonist AF-DX-116. Guanylyl imidodiphosphate [Gpp(NH)p] converted agonist binding sites on the receptor, from high-affinity to the low-affinity state, thus indicating that the cloned receptors couple to endogenous G-proteins. The cloned receptors mediated both adenylate cyclase inhibition and phosphoinositide hydrolysis, but by different mechanisms. Pertussis toxin blocked the inhibition of adenylate cyclase (indicating coupling of the receptor to inhibitory G-protein), but did not affect phosphoinositide turnover. Furthermore, the stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis was less efficient than the inhibition of adenylate cyclase. These findings demonstrate that cloned M1 receptors are capable of mediating multiple responses in the cell by coupling to different effectors, possibly to different G-proteins.     

Distinct Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes Differentially Modulate Acetylcholine Release from Corticocerebral Synaptosomes

The effect of McN-A-343 and oxotremorine on acetylcholine (ACh) release and choline (Ch) transport was studied in corticocerebral synaptosomes of the guinea pig. The synaptosomes were preloaded with [3H]Ch after treatment with the irreversible cholinesterase inhibitor, diisopropyl fluorophosphate, and then tested for their ability to release isotope-labeled ACh and Ch in the presence and absence of these agents. The kinetics of release were determined at the resting state (basal release) and in the presence of 50 mM K+. Under either condition, McN-A-343 enhanced the release of isotope-labeled ACh, whereas oxotremorine inhibited the K(+)-evoked release but had no effect on the basal release. The enhancing effect of McN-A-343 on basal ACh release was fully blocked by the selective M1 muscarinic antagonist, pirenzepine (100 nM). In contrast to its enhancing effect on ACh release, McN-A-343 potently inhibited Ch efflux as well as Ch influx. These effects were not blocked by atropine, a nonselective muscarinic antagonist. Oxotremorine had no effect on Ch transport. Binding studies showed that McN-A-343 was 3.6-fold more potent in displacing radiolabeled quinuclidinyl benzilate from cerebral cortex muscarinic receptors (mostly M1 subtype) than from cerebellar receptors (mostly M2 subtype), whereas oxotremorine was 2.6-fold more potent in the cerebellum. The displacements of radio-labeled pirenzepine and cis-dioxolane confirmed the M1 subtype preference of McN-A-343 and the M2 subtype preference of oxotremorine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Different antagonist binding properties of rat pancreatic and cardiac muscarinic receptors

The antagonist binding properties of rat pancreatic and cardiac muscarinic receptors were compared. In both tissues pirenzepine (PZ) had a low affinity for muscarinic receptors labelled by (3H)N-methylscopolamine [3)NMS) (KD values of 140 and 280 nM, respectively, in pancreatic and cardiac homogenates). The binding properties of pancreatic and cardiac receptors were, however, markedly different. This was indicated by different affinities for dicyclomine, (11-([(2-[diethylamino)-methyl)-1-piperidinyl] acetyl)-5, 11-dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b)(1,4) benzodiazepin-6-on) (AFDX-116), 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine methobromide (4-DAMP) and hexahydrosiladifenidol (HHSiD). Pancreatic and cardiac muscarinic receptors also showed different (3H)NMS association and dissociation rates. These results support the concept of M2 receptor heterogeneity and confirm that M2 receptor subtypes have different binding kinetic properties.     

Muscarinic receptors involved in airway vascular leakage induced by experimental gastro-oesophageal reflux

Gastro-oesophageal acid reflux may cause airway responses such as cough, bronchoconstriction and inflammation in asthmatic patients. Studies in humans or in animals have suggested that these responses involve cholinergic nerves. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the efferent vagal component on airway microvascular leakage induced by instillation of hydrochloric acid (HCl) into the oesophagus of guinea-pigs and the subtype of muscarinic receptors involved. Airway microvascular leakage induced by intra-oesophageal HCl instillation was abolished by bilateral vagotomy or by the nicotinic receptor antagonist, hexamethonium. HCl-induced leakage was inhibited by pretreatment with atropine, a non-specific muscarinic receptor antagonist, and also by pretreatment with either pirenzepine, a muscarinic M(1) receptor antagonist, or 4-DAMP, a muscarinic M(3) receptor antagonist. Pirenzepine was more potent than atropine and 4-DAMP. These antagonists were also studied on airway microvascular leakage or bronchoconstriction induced by intravenous administration of acetylcholine (ACh). Atropine, pirenzepine and 4-DAMP inhibited ACh-induced airway microvascular leakage with similar potencies. In sharp contrast, 4-DAMP and atropine were more potent inhibitors of ACh-induced bronchoconstriction than pirenzepine. Methoctramine, a muscarinic M(2) receptor antagonist, was ineffective in all experimental conditions. These results suggest that airway microvascular leakage caused by HCl intra-oesophageal instillation involves ACh release from vagus nerve terminals and that M(1) and M(3) receptors play a major role in cholinergic-mediated microvascular leakage, whereas M(3) receptors are mainly involved in ACh-induced bronchoconstriction.     

Ca2+ channel antagonist actions in bladder smooth muscle: comparative pharmacologic and [3H]nitrendipine binding studies

The actions of a series of 15 Ca2+ channel antagonists including D-600, nifedipine, and diltiazem were examined against K+ depolarization and muscarinic receptor induced responses in guinea pig bladder smooth muscle. Responses of bladder are very dependent upon extracellular Ca2+ and sensitive to the Ca2+ channel antagonists, the tonic component more than the phasic component of response. Regardless of stimulant, K+ or methylfurmethide (MF), or component of response, the same rank order of antagonist activities is expressed, suggestive of a single structure-activity relationship and the existence of a single category of binding site which may, however, exist in several affinity states. High affinity binding of [3H]nitrendipine (KD = 1.1 X 10(-10) M) occurs in bladder membranes, and similar high affinity binding was found in microsomal preparations from other smooth muscles including guinea pig and rat lung, rat vas deferens, uterus, and stomach. [3H]nitrendipine binding in the bladder was sensitive to displacement by other 1,4-dihydropyridines, paralleling their pharmacologic activities and showing excellent agreement with binding data previously obtained for guinea pig ileal smooth muscle. Comparison of pharmacologic data for inhibition of K+- and MF-induced responses by a common series of Ca2+ channel antagonists in bladder and ileum revealed excellent correlations. Neither pharmacologic nor binding studies suggest significant differences in Ca2+ channel antagonist properties in smooth muscle from bladder and intestine.     

Interaction between muscarinic receptor subtype signal transduction pathways mediating bladder contraction

M(3) muscarinic receptors mediate cholinergic-induced contraction in most smooth muscles. However, in the denervated rat bladder, M(2) receptors participate in contraction because M(3)-selective antagonists [para-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-diphenidol (p-F-HHSiD) and 4-DAMP] have low affinities. However, the affinity of the M(2)-selective antagonist methoctramine in the denervated bladder is consistent with M(3) receptor mediating contraction. It is possible that two pathways interact to mediate contraction: one mediated by the M(2) receptor and one by the M(3) receptor. To determine whether an interaction exists, the inhibitory potencies of combinations of methoctramine and p-F-HHSiD for reversing cholinergic contractions were measured. In normal bladders, all combinations gave additive effects. In denervated bladders, synergistic effects were seen with the 10:1 and 1:1 (methoctramine:p-F-HHSiD wt/wt) combinations. After application of the sarcoplasmic reticulum ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin to normal tissue, the 10:1 and 1:1 ratios became synergistic, mimicking denervated tissue. Thus in normal bladders both M(2) and M(3) receptors can induce contraction. In the denervated bladder, the M(2) and the M(3) receptors interact in a facilitatory manner to mediate contraction.     

Distribution of muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat brain as determined in binding studies with AF-DX 116 and pirenzepine

In vitro competition binding experiments with the selective muscarinic antagonists AF-DX 116 and pirenzepine (PZ) vs 3H-N-methylscopolamine as radioligand revealed a characteristic distribution of muscarinic receptor subtypes in different regions of rat brain. Based on non linear least squares analysis, the binding data were compatible with the presence of three different subtypes: the M1 receptor (high affinity for PZ), the cardiac M2 receptor (high affinity for AF-DX 116) and the glandular M2 receptor (low affinity for PZ and AF-DX 116). The highest proportion of M1 receptors was found in the hippocampus, whilst the cerebellum and the hypothalamus were the regions with the largest fraction of the cardiac M2 and glandular M2 receptors, respectively. In certain brain areas, depending on the relative proportions of the subtypes, flat binding curves were seen for AF-DX 116 and PZ. Based on these data, an approximate distribution pattern of the subtypes in the various brain regions is presented.     

Central oxotremorine antagonist properties of pirenzepine

Pirenzepine, the prototype M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist, is an important compound for investigating the functional significance of M1 receptors at the integrated level of behavior but may have limitations imposed by its physical chemistry. Like the nonselective antagonist methylatropine, pirenzepine is highly hydrophilic and crosses the blood-brain-barrier with difficulty. We compared methylatropine with pirenzepine, given intraperitonealy, as antagonists of the behavioral effects of peripheral or central muscarinic activation. Lever-press responses of male Sprague-Dawley rats were maintained under a schedule requiring 10 responses for each food delivery. Administration of oxotremorine or the quaternary analog oxotremorine-M decreased rates of responding by at least 90%. Both methylatropine and pirenzepine antagonized the behavioral effects of oxotremorine-M; maximum reversal was 70%. Although methylatropine was about 30 times more potent than pirenzepine as an antagonist of the peripheral muscarinic activity of oxotremorine-M, it was inactive as an antagonist of oxotremorine when given in doses up to 153 mumol/kg. Pirenzepine, however, reversed oxotremorine-induced behavioral effects, with a maximum antagonism of 50%. These results suggest that pirenzepine interacts with central muscarinic receptors when administered systemically without producing marked behavioral effects of its own. Systemically administered pirenzepine may thus be a useful tool in further investigations of the relevance of M1 receptors to behavioral function.