Loss of Drosophila Vps16A enhances autophagosome formation through reduced Tor activity

The HOPS tethering complex facilitates autophagosome-lysosome fusion by binding to Syx17 (Syntaxin 17), the autophagosomal SNARE. Here we show that loss of the core HOPS complex subunit Vps16A enhances autophagosome formation and slows down Drosophila development. Mechanistically, Tor kinase is less active in Vps16A mutants likely due to impaired endocytic and biosynthetic transport to the lysosome, a site of its activation. Tor reactivation by overexpression of Rheb suppresses autophagosome formation and restores growth and developmental timing in these animals. Thus, Vps16A reduces autophagosome numbers both by indirectly restricting their formation rate and by directly promoting their clearance. In contrast, the loss of Syx17 blocks autophagic flux without affecting the induction step in Drosophila.     

Thapsigargin distinguishes membrane fusion in the late stages of endocytosis and autophagy

A close relationship exists between autophagy and endocytosis with both sharing lysosomes as their common end-point. Autophagy even requires a functional endocytic pathway. The point at which the two pathways merge, i.e., fusion of autophagosomes and endosomes with lysosomes is poorly understood. Early work in yeast and more recent studies in mammalian cells suggested that conventional membrane trafficking pathways control the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes; Rab GTPases are required to recruit tethering proteins which in turn coordinate the SNARE family of proteins that directly drive membrane fusion. Some components required for endosomes to fuse with lysosomes are also shared by autophagosomes; both are thought to require the GTPase Rab7 and the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) complex. Essentially, the autophagosome becomes endosome-like, allowing it to recruit the common fusion machinery to deliver its contents to the lysosome. This raises an interesting question of how the cell determines when the autophagosome is ready to fuse with the endocytic system and bestows upon it the properties required to recruit the fusion machinery. Our recent work has highlighted this conundrum and shown that autophagosome fusion with lysosomes has specific distinctions from the parallel endosomal-lysosomal pathway.     

Thapsigargin distinguishes membrane fusion in the late stages of endocytosis and autophagy

A close relationship exists between autophagy and endocytosis with both sharing lysosomes as their common end-point. Autophagy even requires a functional endocytic pathway. The point at which the two pathways merge, i.e., fusion of autophagosomes and endosomes with lysosomes is poorly understood. Early work in yeast and more recent studies in mammalian cells suggested that conventional membrane trafficking pathways control the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes; Rab GTPases are required to recruit tethering proteins which in turn coordinate the SNARE family of proteins that directly drive membrane fusion. Some components required for endosomes to fuse with lysosomes are also shared by autophagosomes; both are thought to require the GTPase Rab7 and the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) complex. Essentially, the autophagosome becomes endosome-like, allowing it to recruit the common fusion machinery to deliver its contents to the lysosome. This raises an interesting question of how the cell determines when the autophagosome is ready to fuse with the endocytic system and bestows upon it the properties required to recruit the fusion machinery. Our recent work has highlighted this conundrum and shown that autophagosome fusion with lysosomes has specific distinctions from the parallel endosomal-lysosomal pathway.     

The HOPS complex mediates autophagosome–lysosome fusion through interaction with syntaxin 17

Membrane fusion is generally controlled by Rabs, soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), and tethering complexes. Syntaxin 17 (STX17) was recently identified as the autophagosomal SNARE required for autophagosome–lysosome fusion in mammals and Drosophila. In this study, to better understand the mechanism of autophagosome–lysosome fusion, we searched for STX17-interacting proteins. Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analysis identified vacuolar protein sorting 33A (VPS33A) and VPS16, which are components of the homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS)–tethering complex. We further confirmed that all HOPS components were coprecipitated with STX17. Knockdown of VPS33A, VPS16, or VPS39 blocked autophagic flux and caused accumulation of STX17- and microtubule-associated protein light chain (LC3)–positive autophagosomes. The endocytic pathway was also affected by knockdown of VPS33A, as previously reported, but not by knockdown of STX17. By contrast, ultraviolet irradiation resistance–associated gene (UVRAG), a known HOPS-interacting protein, did not interact with the STX17–HOPS complex and may not be directly involved in autophagosome–lysosome fusion. Collectively these results suggest that, in addition to its well-established function in the endocytic pathway, HOPS promotes autophagosome–lysosome fusion through interaction with STX17.     

Sec1/Munc18 protein Vps33 binds to SNARE domains and the quaternary SNARE complex

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins catalyze membrane fusion events in the secretory and endolysosomal systems, and all SNARE-mediated fusion processes require cofactors of the Sec1/Munc18 (SM) family. Vps33 is an SM protein and subunit of the Vps-C complexes HOPS (homotypic fusion and protein sorting) and CORVET (class C core vacuole/endosome tethering), which are central regulators of endocytic traffic. Here we present biochemical studies of interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae vacuolar SNAREs and the HOPS holocomplex or Vps33 alone. HOPS binds the N-terminal H_abc domain of the Qa-family SNARE Vam3, but Vps33 is not required for this interaction. Instead, Vps33 binds the SNARE domains of Vam3, Vam7, and Nyv1. Vps33 directly binds vacuolar quaternary SNARE complexes, and the affinity of Vps33 for SNARE complexes is greater than for individual SNAREs. Through targeted mutational analyses, we identify missense mutations of Vps33 that produce a novel set of defects, including cargo missorting and the loss of Vps33-HOPS association. Together these data suggest a working model for membrane docking: HOPS associates with N-terminal domains of Vam3 and Vam7 through Vps33-independent interactions, which are followed by binding of Vps33, the HOPS SM protein, to SNARE domains and finally to the quaternary SNARE complex. Our results also strengthen the hypothesis that SNARE complex binding is a core attribute of SM protein function.     

Endosome-lysosome fusion

The delivery of endocytosed cargo to lysosomes occurs through kissing and direct fusion of late endosomes/MVBs (multivesicular bodies) and lysosomes. Live-cell and electron microscopy experiments together with cell-free assays have allowed us to describe the characteristics of the delivery process and determine the core protein machinery required for fusion. The ESCRT (endosomal sorting complex required for transport) machinery is required for MVB biogenesis. The HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting) complex is required for endosome-lysosome tethering and a trans-SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor-attachment protein receptor) complex including the R-SNARE VAMP7 (vesicle-associated membrane protein 7) mediates endosome-lysosome membrane fusion. Protein-binding partners of VAMP7 including the clathrin adaptors AP-3 (adaptor protein 3) and Hrb (HIV Rev-binding protein) are required for its correct intracellular localization and function. Overall, co-ordination of the activities of ESCRT, HOPS and SNARE complexes are required for efficient delivery of endocytosed macromolecules to lysosomes. Endosome-lysosome fusion results in a hybrid organelle from which lysosomes are re-formed. Defects in fusion and/or lysosome reformation occur in a number of lysosome storage diseases.     

Impairment of autophagosome-lysosome fusion in the buff mutant mice with the VPS33AD251E mutation

The HOPS (homotypic fusion and protein sorting) complex functions in endocytic and autophagic pathways in both lower eukaryotes and mammalian cells through its involvement in fusion events between endosomes and lysosomes or autophagosomes and lysosomes. However, the differential molecular mechanisms underlying these fusion processes are largely unknown. Buff (bf) is a mouse mutant that carries an Asp251-to-Glu point mutation (D251E) in the VPS33A protein, a tethering protein and a core subunit of the HOPS complex. Bf mice showed impaired spontaneous locomotor activity, motor learning, and autophagic activity. Although the gross anatomy of the brain was apparently normal, the number of Purkinje cells was significantly reduced. Furthermore, we found that fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes was defective in bf cells without compromising the endocytic pathway. The direct association of mutant VPS33A^D251E with the autophagic SNARE complex, STX17 (syntaxin 17)-VAMP8-SNAP29, was enhanced. In addition, the VPS33A^D251E mutation enhanced interactions with other HOPS subunits, namely VPS41, VPS39, VPS18, and VPS11, except for VPS16. Reduction of the interactions between VPS33A^Y440D and several other HOPS subunits led to decreased association with STX17. These results suggest that the VPS33A^D251E mutation plays dual roles by increasing the HOPS complex assembly and its association with the autophagic SNARE complex, which selectively affects the autophagosome-lysosome fusion that impairs basal autophagic activity and induces Purkinje cell loss.     

Yeast homotypic vacuole fusion requires the Ccz1-Mon1 complex during the tethering/docking stage

The function of the yeast lysosome/vacuole is critically linked with the morphology of the organelle. Accordingly, highly regulated processes control vacuolar fission and fusion events. Analysis of homotypic vacuole fusion demonstrated that vacuoles from strains defective in the CCZ1 and MON1 genes could not fuse. Morphological evidence suggested that these mutant vacuoles could not proceed to the tethering/docking stage. Ccz1 and Mon1 form a stable protein complex that binds the vacuole membrane. In the absence of the Ccz1-Mon1 complex, the integrity of vacuole SNARE pairing and the unpaired SNARE class C Vps/HOPS complex interaction were both impaired. The Ccz1-Mon1 complex colocalized with other fusion components on the vacuole as part of the cis-SNARE complex, and the association of the Ccz1-Mon1 complex with the vacuole appeared to be regulated by the class C Vps/HOPS complex proteins. Accordingly, we propose that the Ccz1-Mon1 complex is critical for the Ypt7-dependent tethering/docking stage leading to the formation of a trans-SNARE complex and subsequent vacuole fusion.     

Defined Subunit Arrangement and Rab Interactions Are Required for Functionality of the HOPS Tethering Complex

Within the endomembrane system of eukaryotic cells, multisubunit tethering complexes together with their corresponding Rab‐GTPases coordinate vesicle tethering and fusion. Here, we present evidence that two homologous hexameric tethering complexes, the endosomal CORVET (Class C core vacuole/endosome transport) and the vacuolar HOPS (homotypic vacuole fusion and protein sorting) complex, have similar subunit topologies. Both complexes contain two Rab‐binding proteins at one end, and the Sec1/Munc18‐like Vps33 at the opposite side, suggesting a model on membrane bridging via Rab‐GTP and SNARE binding. In agreement, HOPS activity can be reconstituted using purified subcomplexes containing the Rab and Vps33 module, but requires all six subunits for activity. At the center of HOPS and CORVET, the class C proteins Vps11 and Vps18 connect the two parts, and Vps11 binds both HOPS Vps39 and CORVET Vps3 via the same binding site. As HOPS Vps39 is also found at endosomes, our data thus suggest that these tethering complexes follow defined but distinct assembly pathways, and may undergo transition by simple subunit interchange.     

The CORVET tethering complex interacts with the yeast Rab5 homolog Vps21 and is involved in endo-lysosomal biogenesis

The dynamic equilibrium between vesicle fission and fusion at Golgi, endosome, and vacuole/lysosome is critical for the maintenance of organelle identity. It depends, among others, on Rab GTPases and tethering factors, whose function and regulation are still unclear. We now show that transport among Golgi, endosome, and vacuole is controlled by two homologous tethering complexes, the previously identified HOPS complex at the vacuole and a novel endosomal tethering (CORVET) complex, which interacts with the Rab GTPase Vps21. Both complexes share the four class C Vps proteins: Vps11, Vps16, Vps18, and Vps33. The HOPS complex, in addition, contains Vps41/Vam2 and Vam6, whereas the CORVET complex has the Vps41 homolog Vps8 and the (h)Vam6 homolog Vps3. Strikingly, the CORVET and HOPS complexes can interconvert; we identify two additional intermediate complexes, both consisting of the class C core bound to Vam6-Vps8 or Vps3-Vps41. Our data suggest that modular assembled tethering complexes define organelle biogenesis in the endocytic pathway.     

HOPS drives vacuole fusion by binding the vacuolar SNARE complex and the Vam7 PX domain via two distinct sites

Membrane fusion within the endomembrane system follows a defined order of events: membrane tethering, mediated by Rabs and tethers, assembly of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes, and lipid bilayer mixing. Here we present evidence that the vacuolar HOPS tethering complex controls fusion through specific interactions with the vacuolar SNARE complex (consisting of Vam3, Vam7, Vti1, and Nyv1) and the N-terminal domains of Vam7 and Vam3. We show that homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS) binds Vam7 via its subunits Vps16 and Vps18. In addition, we observed that Vps16, Vps18, and the Sec1/Munc18 protein Vps33, which is also part of the HOPS complex, bind to the Q-SNARE complex. In agreement with this observation, HOPS-stimulated fusion was inhibited if HOPS was preincubated with the minimal Q-SNARE complex. Importantly, artificial targeting of Vam7 without its PX domain to membranes rescued vacuole morphology in vivo, but resulted in a cytokinesis defect if the N-terminal domain of Vam3 was also removed. Our data thus support a model of HOPS-controlled membrane fusion by recognizing different elements of the SNARE complex.     

Recruitment of VPS33A to HOPS by VPS16 Is Required for Lysosome Fusion with Endosomes and Autophagosomes

The mammalian homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) complex is comprised of six subunits: VPS11, VPS16, VPS18, VPS39, VPS41 and the Sec1/Munc18 (SM) family member VPS33A. Human HOPS has been predicted to be a tethering complex required for fusion of intracellular compartments with lysosomes, but it remains unclear whether all HOPS subunits are required. We showed that the whole HOPS complex is required for fusion of endosomes with lysosomes by monitoring the delivery of endocytosed fluorescent dextran to lysosomes in cells depleted of individual HOPS proteins. We used the crystal structure of the VPS16/VPS33A complex to design VPS16 and VPS33A mutants that no longer bind each other and showed that, unlike the wild‐type proteins, these mutants no longer rescue lysosome fusion with endosomes or autophagosomes in cells depleted of the endogenous proteins. There was no effect of depleting either VIPAR or VPS33B, paralogs of VPS16 and VPS33A, on fusion of lysosomes with either endosomes or autophagosomes and immunoprecipitation showed that they form a complex distinct from HOPS. Our data demonstrate the necessity of recruiting the SM protein VPS33A to HOPS via its interaction with VPS16 and that HOPS proteins, but not VIPAR or VPS33B, are essential for fusion of endosomes or autophagosomes with lysosomes.      

The role of mVps18p in clustering, fusion, and intracellular localization of late endocytic organelles

Delivery of endocytosed macromolecules to mammalian cell lysosomes occurs by direct fusion of late endosomes with lysosomes, resulting in the formation of hybrid organelles from which lysosomes are reformed. The molecular mechanisms of this fusion are analogous to those of homotypic vacuole fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We report herein the major roles of the mammalian homolog of yeast Vps18p (mVps18p), a member of the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting complex. When overexpressed, mVps18p caused the clustering of late endosomes/lysosomes and the recruitment of other mammalian homologs of the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting complex, plus Rab7-interacting lysosomal protein. The clusters were surrounded by components of the actin cytoskeleton, including actin, ezrin, and specific unconventional myosins. Overexpression of mVps18p also overcame the effect of wortmannin treatment, which inhibits membrane traffic out of late endocytic organelles and causes their swelling. Reduction of mVps18p by RNA interference caused lysosomes to disperse away from their juxtanuclear location. Thus, mVps18p plays a critical role in endosome/lysosome tethering, fusion, intracellular localization and in the reformation of lysosomes from hybrid organelles.     

Structural Identification of the Vps18 β-Propeller Reveals a Critical Role in the HOPS Complex Stability and Function

Membrane fusion at the vacuole, the lysosome equivalent in yeast, requires the HOPS tethering complex, which is recruited by the Rab7 GTPase Ypt7. HOPS provides a template for the assembly of SNAREs and thus likely confers fusion at a distinct position on vacuoles. Five of the six subunits in HOPS have a similar domain prediction with strong similarity to COPII subunits and nuclear porins. Here, we show that Vps18 indeed has a seven-bladed β-propeller as its N-terminal domain by revealing its structure at 2.14 Å. The Vps18 N-terminal domain can interact with the N-terminal part of Vps11 and also binds to lipids. Although deletion of the Vps18 N-terminal domain does not preclude HOPS assembly, as revealed by negative stain electron microscopy, the complex is instable and cannot support membrane fusion in vitro. We thus conclude that the β-propeller of Vps18 is required for HOPS stability and function and that it can serve as a starting point for further structural analyses of the HOPS tethering complex.     

Subunit exchange among endolysosomal tethering complexes is linked to contact site formation at the vacuole

The hexameric HOPS (homotypic fusion and protein sorting) complex is a conserved tethering complex at the lysosome-like vacuole, where it mediates tethering and promotes all fusion events involving this organelle. The Vps39 subunit of this complex also engages in a membrane contact site between the vacuole and the mitochondria, called vCLAMP. Additionally, four subunits of HOPS are also part of the endosomal CORVET tethering complex. Here, we analyzed the partition of HOPS and CORVET subunits between the different complexes by tracing their localization and function. We find that Vps39 has a specific role in vCLAMP formation beyond tethering, and that vCLAMPs and HOPS compete for the same pool of Vps39. In agreement, we find that the CORVET subunit Vps3 can take the position of Vps39 in HOPS. This endogenous pool of a Vps3-hybrid complex is affected by Vps3 or Vps39 levels, suggesting that HOPS and CORVET assembly is dynamic. Our data shed light on how individual subunits of tethering complexes such as Vps39 can participate in other functions, while maintaining the remaining subcomplex available for its function in tethering and fusion.     

The HOPS/Class C Vps Complex Tethers High‐Curvature Membranes via a Direct Protein–Membrane Interaction

Membrane tethering is a physical association of two membranes before their fusion. Many membrane tethering factors have been identified, but the interactions that mediate inter‐membrane associations remain largely a matter of conjecture. Previously, we reported that the homotypic fusion and protein sorting/Class C vacuolar protein sorting (HOPS/Class C Vps) complex, which has two binding sites for the yeast vacuolar Rab GTPase Ypt7p, can tether two low‐curvature liposomes when both membranes bear Ypt7p. Here, we show that HOPS tethers highly curved liposomes to Ypt7p‐bearing low‐curvature liposomes even when the high‐curvature liposomes are protein‐free. Phosphorylation of the curvature‐sensing amphipathic lipid‐packing sensor (ALPS) motif from the Vps41p HOPS subunit abrogates tethering of high‐curvature liposomes. A HOPS complex without its Vps39p subunit, which contains one of the Ypt7p binding sites in HOPS, lacks tethering activity, though it binds high‐curvature liposomes and Ypt7p‐bearing low‐curvature liposomes. Thus, HOPS tethers highly curved membranes via a direct protein–membrane interaction. Such high‐curvature membranes are found at the sites of vacuole tethering and fusion. There, vacuole membranes bend sharply, generating large areas of vacuole‐vacuole contact. We propose that HOPS localizes via the Vps41p ALPS motif to these high‐curvature regions. There, HOPS binds via Vps39p to Ypt7p in an apposed vacuole membrane.      

Evolutionarily conserved role and physiological relevance of a STX17/Syx17 (syntaxin 17)-containing SNARE complex in autophagosome fusion with endosomes and lysosomes

Phagophores engulf cytoplasmic material and give rise to autophagosomes, double-membrane vesicles mediating cargo transport to lysosomes for degradation. The regulation of autophagosome fusion with endosomes and lysosomes during autophagy has remained poorly characterized. Two recent papers conclude that STX17/syntaxin 17 (Syx17 in Drosophila) has an evolutionarily conserved role in autophagosome fusion with endosomes and lysosomes, acting in one SNARE complex with SNAP29 (ubisnap in Drosophila) and the endosomal/lysosomal VAMP8 (CG1599/Vamp7 in Drosophila). Surprisingly, a third report suggests that STX17 might also contribute to proper phagophore assembly. Although several experiments presented in the two human cell culture studies yielded controversial results, the essential role of STX17 in autophagic flux is now firmly established, both in cultured cells and in an animal model. Based on these data, we propose that genetic inhibition of STX17/Syx17 may be a more specific tool in autophagic flux experiments than currently used drug treatments, which impair all lysosomal degradation routes and also inactivate MTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin), a major negative regulator of autophagy. Finally, the neuronal dysfunction and locomotion defects observed in Syx17 mutant animals point to the possible contribution of defective autophagosome clearance to various human diseases.     

A genetic model with specifically impaired autophagosome–lysosome fusion

Yeast studies identified the evolutionarily conserved core ATG genes responsible for autophagosome formation. However, the SNARE-dependent machinery involved in autophagosome fusion with the vacuole in yeast is not conserved. We recently reported that the SNARE complex consisting of Syx17 (Syntaxin 17), ubisnap (SNAP-29) and Vamp7 is required for the fusion of autophagosomes with late endosomes and lysosomes in Drosophila. Syx17 mutant flies are viable but exhibit neuronal dysfunction, locomotion defects and premature death. These data point to the critical role of autophagosome clearance in organismal homeodynamics.     

The tethering complex HOPS catalyzes assembly of the soluble SNARE Vam7 into fusogenic trans-SNARE complexes

The fusion of yeast vacuolar membranes depends on the disassembly of cis–soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes and the subsequent reassembly of new SNARE complexes in trans. The disassembly of cis-SNARE complexes by Sec17/Sec18p releases the soluble SNARE Vam7p from vacuolar membranes. Consequently, Vam7p needs to be recruited to the membrane at future sites of fusion to allow the formation of trans-SNARE complexes. The multisubunit tethering homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) complex, which is essential for the fusion of vacuolar membranes, was previously shown to have direct affinity for Vam7p. The functional significance of this interaction, however, has been unclear. Using a fully reconstituted in vitro fusion reaction, we now show that HOPS facilitates membrane fusion by recruiting Vam7p for fusion. In the presence of HOPS, unlike with other tethering agents, very low levels of added Vam7p suffice to induce vigorous fusion. This is a specific recruitment of Vam7p rather than an indirect stimulation of SNARE complex formation through tethering, as HOPS does not facilitate fusion with a low amount of a soluble form of another vacuolar SNARE, Vti1p. Our findings establish yet another function among the multiple tasks that HOPS performs to catalyze the fusion of yeast vacuoles.     

Functional Separation of Endosomal Fusion Factors and the Class C Core Vacuole/Endosome Tethering (CORVET) Complex in Endosome Biogenesis

Transport along the endolysosomal system requires multiple fusion events at early and late endosomes. Deletion of several endosomal fusion factors, including the Vac1 tether and the Class C core vacuole/endosome tethering (CORVET) complex-specific subunits Vps3 and Vps8, results in a class D vps phenotype. As these mutants have an apparently similar defect in endosomal transport, we asked whether CORVET and Vac1 could still act in distinct tethering reactions. Our data reveal that CORVET mutants can be rescued by Vac1 overexpression in the endocytic pathway but not in CPY or Cps1 sorting to the vacuole. Moreover, when we compared the ultrastructure, CORVET mutants were most similar to deletions of the Rab Vps21 and its guanine nucleotide exchange factor Vps9 and different from vac1 deletion, indicating separate functions. Likewise, CORVET still localized to endosomes even in the absence of Vac1, whereas Vac1 localization became diffuse in CORVET mutants. Importantly, CORVET localization requires the Rab5 homologs Vps21 and Ypt52, whereas Vac1 localization is strictly Vps21-dependent. In this context, we also uncover that Muk1 can compensate for loss of Vps9 in CORVET localization, indicating that two Rab5 guanine nucleotide exchange factors operate in the endocytic pathway. Overall, our study reveals a unique role of CORVET in the sorting of biosynthetic cargo to the vacuole/lysosome.