An ER‐peroxisome tether exerts peroxisome population control in yeast

Eukaryotic cells compartmentalize biochemical reactions into membrane‐enclosed organelles that must be faithfully propagated from one cell generation to the next. Transport and retention processes balance the partitioning of organelles between mother and daughter cells. Here we report the identification of an ER‐peroxisome tether that links peroxisomes to the ER and ensures peroxisome population control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The tether consists of the peroxisome biogenic protein, Pex3p, and the peroxisome inheritance factor, Inp1p. Inp1p bridges the two compartments by acting as a molecular hinge between ER‐bound Pex3p and peroxisomal Pex3p. Asymmetric peroxisome division leads to the formation of Inp1p‐containing anchored peroxisomes and Inp1p‐deficient mobile peroxisomes that segregate to the bud. While peroxisomes in mother cells are not released from tethering, de novo formation of tethers in the bud assists in the directionality of peroxisome transfer. Peroxisomes are thus stably maintained over generations of cells through their continued interaction with tethers.     

Sharing the wealth: peroxisome inheritance in budding yeast

Eukaryotic cells have evolved molecular mechanisms to ensure the faithful partitioning of cellular components during cell division. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has to actively deliver about half of its organelles to the growing bud, while retaining the remaining organelles in the mother cell. Until lately, little was known about the inheritance of peroxisomes. Recent studies have identified the peroxisomal proteins Inp1p and Inp2p as two key regulators of peroxisome inheritance that perform antagonistic functions. Inp1p is required for the retention of peroxisomes in mother cells, whereas Inp2p promotes the bud-directed movement of these organelles. Inp1p anchors peroxisomes to the cell cortex by interacting with specific structures lining the cell periphery. On the other hand, Inp2p functions as the peroxisome-specific receptor for the class V myosin, Myo2p, thereby linking peroxisomes to the translocation machinery that propels peroxisome movement. Tight coordination between Inp1p and Inp2p ensures a fair and harmonious spatial segregation of peroxisomes upon cell division.     

Inp1p is a peroxisomal membrane protein required for peroxisome inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cells have evolved molecular mechanisms for the efficient transmission of organelles during cell division. Little is known about how peroxisomes are inherited. Inp1p is a peripheral membrane protein of peroxisomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that affects both the morphology of peroxisomes and their partitioning during cell division. In vivo 4-dimensional video microscopy showed an inability of mother cells to retain a subset of peroxisomes in dividing cells lacking the INP1 gene, whereas cells overexpressing INP1 exhibited immobilized peroxisomes that failed to be partitioned to the bud. Overproduced Inp1p localized to both peroxisomes and the cell cortex, supporting an interaction of Inp1p with specific structures lining the cell periphery. The levels of Inp1p vary with the cell cycle. Inp1p binds Pex25p, Pex30p, and Vps1p, which have been implicated in controlling peroxisome division. Our findings are consistent with Inp1p acting as a factor that retains peroxisomes in cells and controls peroxisome division. Inp1p is the first peroxisomal protein directly implicated in peroxisome inheritance.     

Pex3 peroxisome biogenesis proteins function in peroxisome inheritance as class V myosin receptors

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, peroxisomal inheritance from mother cell to bud is conducted by the class V myosin motor, Myo2p. However, homologues of S. cerevisiae Myo2p peroxisomal receptor, Inp2p, are not readily identifiable outside the Saccharomycetaceae family. Here, we demonstrate an unexpected role for Pex3 proteins in peroxisome inheritance. Both Pex3p and Pex3Bp are peroxisomal integral membrane proteins that function as peroxisomal receptors for class V myosin through direct interaction with the myosin globular tail. In cells lacking Pex3Bp, peroxisomes are preferentially retained by the mother cell, whereas most peroxisomes gather and are transferred en masse to the bud in cells overexpressing Pex3Bp or Pex3p. Our results reveal an unprecedented role for members of the Pex3 protein family in peroxisome motility and inheritance in addition to their well-established role in peroxisome biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results point to a temporal link between peroxisome formation and inheritance and delineate a general mechanism of peroxisome inheritance in eukaryotic cells.     

The peroxisomal membrane protein Inp2p is the peroxisome-specific receptor for the myosin V motor Myo2p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The faithful inheritance of organelles by daughter cells is essential to maintain the benefits afforded to eukaryotic cells by compartmentalization of biochemical functions. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the class V myosin, Myo2p, is involved in transporting different organelles, including the peroxisome, along actin cables to the bud. We identified Inp2p as the peroxisome-specific receptor for Myo2p. Cells lacking Inp2p fail to partition peroxisomes to the bud but are unaffected in the inheritance of other organelles. Inp2p is a peroxisomal membrane protein, preferentially enriched in peroxisomes delivered to the bud. Inp2p interacts directly with the globular tail of Myo2p. Cells overproducing Inp2p often transfer their entire populations of peroxisomes to buds. The levels of Inp2p oscillate with the cell cycle. Organelle-specific receptors like Inp2p explain how a single motor can move different organelles in distinct and specific patterns. To our knowledge, Inp2p is the first peroxisomal protein implicated in the vectorial movement of peroxisomes.     

Give what you can and keep what you need!

EMBO J 32 18, 2439–2453 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.170; published online July302013During cell division, peroxisomes are inherited to daughter cells but some are retained in the mother cells. Our knowledge on how peroxisome inheritance and retention is balanced and how this is regulated for each individual organelle remains incompletely understood. The new findings by Knoblach et al (2013) published in this issue of The EMBO Journal demonstrate that Inp1p functions as a bridging protein to connect ER-resident Pex3p and peroxisomal Pex3p, which anchors peroxisomes to the cortical ER for organelle retention in the mother cell. Asymmetric peroxisome division generates peroxisomes, which lack Inp1p but contain Inp2p instead, and only these peroxisomes are primed for myosin-driven transport to daughter cells.Peroxisomes are single membrane-bound organelles found in almost all eukaryotic cells. They harbour a wide spectrum of metabolic activities that vary among different species, developmental stages and cell types (Schlüter et al, 2010). Eukaryotic cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms to ensure the maintenance of peroxisomes. New peroxisomes can form either de novo by budding from the ER or by growth and division of pre-existing organelles (Lazarow and Fujiki, 1985; Hoepfner et al, 2005). Despite the fact that peroxisomes can form de novo, yeast favours to multiply peroxisomes by growth and division (Motley and Hettema, 2007). It therefore has to be ensured that both mother and daughter cells get their share of peroxisomes during cell division. Thus, some peroxisomes need to be retained in the mother cell, while other peroxisomes are directed for transport and inheritance to daughter cells. Both processes have to be balanced to ensure a successful distribution of the organelles between the mother cell and the newly formed bud.The molecular details of how an even peroxisome distribution of dividing cells are maintained have now been disclosed by Knoblach et al (2013), advancing an exciting scientific journey. This journey originally started by the finding that the partitioning of peroxisomes between mother cell and bud is dependent on actin filaments and the myosin motor protein Myo2p (Hoepfner et al, 2001). Inp1p and Inp2p were identified by the Rachubinski group and Inp2p turned out to function as the peroxisomal tether, which interacts with Myo2p and hooks the organelle onto the actin-track on the road to the bud (Fagarasanu et al, 2006). Inp1p was shown to be a peripheral peroxisomal membrane protein, which acts as a peroxisome-retention factor, tethering peroxisomes to putative anchoring structures within the mother cell and bud (Fagarasanu et al, 2005). Later on, Pex3p, a multi-functional protein of the peroxisomal life cycle, was identified as peroxisomal membrane anchor of Inp1p (Munck et al, 2009). Until now, it was therefore known that peroxisomes hook onto Inp1p by Pex3p and Inp1p connects peroxisomes to cortical structures of unknown nature. Thus, it was an open question how peroxisomes are trapped in the mother cell and which additional factors are required for this process.The work of Knoblach et al (2013) published in this issue of The EMBO Journal now unravelled this mystery, allowing for a more complete picture of the whole process of peroxisome retention and inheritance (Figure 1A). The authors show that peroxisomes are recruited to mitochondria that artificially expose Inp1p on their surface, clearly demonstrating that Inp1p acts as a peroxisome tether. Most importantly, they identified the mechanism of how peroxisomes are directed and anchored to the cell cortex: the ER acts as a membrane anchor for the retention of peroxisomes during cell division. In vitro binding assays revealed that Inp1p contains two independent binding sites for Pex3p, located at the C- and the N-terminal region of the protein, respectively. Since Pex3p exhibits a dual localization at the peroxisomal membrane and at the ER, Inp1p seems to bind to Pex3p of both compartments in vivo and thus link Pex3p molecules across two membranes. Indeed, it turned out that ER-located Pex3p recruits Inp1p to discrete foci in close proximity to the cortical ER. Using the split-GFP assay, the authors confirmed that Inp1p interacts not only with ER-bound Pex3p but also with Pex3p in the peroxisomal membrane. Thus, the core of the ER-peroxisome tether is generated by the Inp1p-mediated linkage of ER-bound Pex3p with peroxisomal Pex3p. The functional relevance of this ER-peroxisome tether is disclosed by the phenotype of peroxisome inheritance mutants. Accordingly, the Pex3p–V81E mutant, affected in the recruitment of Inp1p to the ER, is characterized by a defect of ER retention of peroxisomes, which drives all peroxisomes into the bud and leaves no peroxisomes in the mother cell (Figure 1B).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Peroxisome retention and inheritance (A) free peroxisomes in the mother cell (stage I) are anchored to cortical ER by a tethering complex consisting of two molecules Pex3p, one located at the ER and the other associated with the peroxisomal membrane and Inp1p, which connects the ER-bound and peroxisome-bound Pex3p (stage II). Accordingly, Inp1p contains two Pex3p-binding domains, allowing the protein to function as a bridge between the two Pex3p-containing organelles. Peroxisomes elongate and divide, and Inp2p is loaded onto peroxisomes with an asymmetric distribution (stage III). The peroxisomal population that lacks Inp2p is anchored to the cortical ER, whereas the population of cytosolic peroxisomes containing Inp2p is destined for the transport to the bud (stage IV). To this end, Inp2p interacts with Myo2p and thus triggers the movement of the peroxisome along actin cables to the bud. The process is completed when the peroxisome is released from Myo2p in the bud (stage I). In wild-type cells, the described retention and inheritance process leads to an equal distribution of peroxisomes between mother cell. The described molecular mechanism results in a regulated balance of retention and inheritance of peroxisomes, ensuring that both the mother cell and the newly formed bud gain their share of peroxisomes. (B) However, when the endogenous Pex3p is replaced by a Pex3p-mutant (Pex3p–V81E), which lost its strong binding capacity to Inp1p, peroxisomes are not anchored to the cortical ER anymore, with the consequence that during cells'' division the entire organelle population is transported to the bud and peroxisomes are not retained in the mother cell.To piece together the puzzle, a final gap had to be filled. How is the peroxisomal fraction remaining in the mother cell discriminated from those ferried to the bud during cell division? In budding wild-type cells, Inp1p exhibits a striking asymmetry along the cell division axis. Knoblach et al (2013) show that most peroxisomes of the mother cell contain Inp1p, while peroxisomes that are ferried towards the bud contain little or no Inp1p. Live-cell video microscopy of individual peroxisome revealed that Inp1p-containing peroxisomes were mostly immobile and retained in the mother cell, while highly mobile peroxisomes contained Inp2p and were predominantly found in the bud. The question remains of how peroxisomes lacking Inp1p but containing Inp2p are formed? To tackle this question, the authors took advantage of the fact that cells defective in peroxisome division contain single enlarged peroxisomes and project a tubular extension into the bud upon cell division (Kuravi et al, 2006). Remarkably, Knoblach et al (2013) show that Inp1p and Inp2p localized to opposite ends of the giant peroxisome. Inp1p was confined to the part of the peroxisome that was retained in the mother cell, while Inp2p enriched at the tubule that protruded into the bud.In summary, Knoblach et al (2013) discovered the ER as the site for peroxisome binding to the cell cortex that is responsible for the retention of peroxisomes in the mother cells during cell division and identified Inp1p as a molecular hinge connecting Pex3p of peroxisomal and ER membranes. Furthermore, peroxisome division is shown to result in an asymmetric distribution of inheritance factors with Inp1p-containing organelles remaining tethered to the ER in the mother cell, while Inp2p-containing peroxisomes hook onto myosin motor proteins for movement to the bud. These remarkable discoveries disclose the molecular mechanism of peroxisome retention and inheritance during cell division. Moreover, this study adds to other known functions of Pex3p, which besides its newly discovered role as ER-tether for peroxisomes is also known as an initiator of de novo formation of peroxisomes, a docking factor for the transport of peroxisomal membrane proteins and a tether for the regulated degradation of peroxisomes. This study adds more complexity to the network of regulated processes in peroxisome biogenesis that all merge at Pex3p, and will certainly provide the ground for further exploration.     

Pex19p contributes to peroxisome inheritance in the association of peroxisomes to Myo2p

During budding of yeast cells peroxisomes are distributed over mother cell and bud, a process that involves the myosin motor protein Myo2p and the peroxisomal membrane protein Inp2p. Here, we show that Pex19p, a peroxin implicated in targeting and complex formation of peroxisomal membrane proteins, also plays a role in peroxisome partitioning. Binding studies revealed that Pex19p interacts with the cargo-binding domain of Myo2p. We identified mutations in Myo2p that specifically reduced binding to Pex19p, but not to Inp2p. The interaction between Myo2p and Pex19p was also reduced by a mutation that blocked Pex19p farnesylation. Microscopy revealed that the Pex19p-Myo2p interaction is important for peroxisome inheritance, because mutations that affect this interaction hamper peroxisome inheritance in vivo. Together these data suggest that both Inp2p and Pex19p are required for proper association of peroxisomes to Myo2p.     

Yarrowia lipolytica Cells Mutant for the Peroxisomal Peroxin Pex19p Contain Structures Resembling Wild-Type Peroxisomes

PEX genes encode peroxins, which are proteins required for peroxisome assembly. The PEX19 gene of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica was isolated by functional complementation of the oleic acid-nonutilizing strain pex19-1 and encodes Pex19p, a protein of 324 amino acids (34,822 Da). Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence microscopy showed Pex19p to be localized primarily to peroxisomes. Pex19p is detected in cells grown in glucose-containing medium, and its levels are not increased by incubation of cells in oleic acid-containing medium, the metabolism of which requires intact peroxisomes. pex19 cells preferentially mislocalize peroxisomal matrix proteins and the peripheral intraperoxisomal membrane peroxin Pex16p to the cytosol, although small amounts of these proteins could be reproducibly localized to a subcellular fraction enriched for peroxisomes. In contrast, the peroxisomal integral membrane protein Pex2p exhibits greatly reduced levels in pex19 cells compared with its levels in wild-type cells. Importantly, pex19 cells were shown by electron microscopy to contain structures that resemble wild-type peroxisomes in regards to size, shape, number, and electron density. Subcellular fractionation and isopycnic density gradient centrifugation confirmed the presence of vesicular structures in pex19 mutant strains that were similar in density to wild-type peroxisomes and that contained profiles of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins that are similar to, yet distinct from, those of wild-type peroxisomes. Because peroxisomal structures form in pex19 cells, Pex19p apparently does not function as a peroxisomal membrane protein receptor in Y. lipolytica. Our results are consistent with a role for Y. lipolytica Pex19p in stabilizing the peroxisomal membrane.     

Fusion of small peroxisomal vesicles in vitro reconstructs an early step in the in vivo multistep peroxisome assembly pathway of Yarrowia lipolytica

We have identified and purified six subforms of peroxisomes, designated P1 to P6, from the yeast, Yarrowia lipolytica. An analysis of trafficking of peroxisomal proteins in vivo suggests the existence of a multistep peroxisome assembly pathway in Y. lipolytica. This pathway operates by conversion of peroxisomal subforms in the direction P1, P2-->P3-->P4-->P5-->P6 and involves the import of various peroxisomal proteins into distinct vesicular intermediates. We have also reconstituted in vitro the fusion of the earliest intermediates in the pathway, small peroxisomal vesicles P1 and P2. Their fusion leads to the formation of a larger and more dense peroxisomal vesicle, P3. Fusion of P1 and P2 in vitro requires cytosol and ATP hydrolysis and is inhibited by antibodies to two membrane-associated ATPases of the AAA family, Pex1p and Pex6p. We provide evidence that the fusion in vitro of P1 and P2 peroxisomes reconstructs an actual early step in the peroxisome assembly pathway operating in vivo in Y. lipolytica.     

A role for Vps1p, actin, and the Myo2p motor in peroxisome abundance and inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In vivo time-lapse microscopy reveals that the number of peroxisomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells is fairly constant and that a subset of the organelles are targeted and segregated to the bud in a highly ordered, vectorial process. The dynamin-like protein Vps1p controls the number of peroxisomes, since in a vps1Delta mutant only one or two giant peroxisomes remain. Analogous to the function of other dynamin-related proteins, Vps1p may be involved in a membrane fission event that is required for the regulation of peroxisome abundance. We found that efficient segregation of peroxisomes from mother to bud is dependent on the actin cytoskeleton, and active movement of peroxisomes along actin filaments is driven by the class V myosin motor protein, Myo2p: (a) peroxisomal dynamics always paralleled the polarity of the actin cytoskeleton, (b) double labeling of peroxisomes and actin cables revealed a close association between both, (c) depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton abolished all peroxisomal movements, and (d) in cells containing thermosensitive alleles of MYO2, all peroxisome movement immediately stopped at the nonpermissive temperature. In addition, time-lapse videos showing peroxisome movement in wild-type and vps1Delta cells suggest the existence of various levels of control involved in the partitioning of peroxisomes.     

Regulation of peroxisome size and number by fatty acid beta -oxidation in the yeast yarrowia lipolytica

The Yarrowia lipolytica MFE2 gene encodes peroxisomal beta-oxidation multifunctional enzyme type 2 (MFE2). MFE2 is peroxisomal in a wild-type strain but is cytosolic in a strain lacking the peroxisomal targeting signal-1 (PTS1) receptor. MFE2 has a PTS1, Ala-Lys-Leu, that is essential for targeting to peroxisomes. MFE2 lacking a PTS1 can apparently oligomerize with full-length MFE2 to enable targetting to peroxisomes. Peroxisomes of an oleic acid-induced MFE2 deletion strain, mfe2-KO, are larger and more abundant than those of the wild-type strain. Under growth conditions not requiring peroxisomes, peroxisomes of mfe2-KO are larger but less abundant than those of the wild-type strain, suggesting a role for MFE2 in the regulation of peroxisome size and number. A nonfunctional version of MFE2 did not restore normal peroxisome morphology to mfe2-KO cells, indicating that their phenotype is not due to the absence of MFE2. mfe2-KO cells contain higher amounts of beta-oxidation enzymes than do wild-type cells. We also show that increasing the level of the beta-oxidation enzyme thiolase results in enlarged peroxisomes. Our results implicate peroxisomal beta-oxidation in the control of peroxisome size and number in yeast.     

Mutants of the Yarrowia lipolytica PEX23 gene encoding an integral peroxisomal membrane peroxin mislocalize matrix proteins and accumulate vesicles containing peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins

pex mutants are defective in peroxisome assembly. The mutant strain pex23-1 of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica lacks morphologically recognizable peroxisomes and mislocalizes all peroxisomal matrix proteins investigated preferentially to the cytosol. pex23 strains accumulate vesicular structures containing both peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins. The PEX23 gene was isolated by functional complementation of the pex23-1 strain and encodes a protein, Pex23p, of 418 amino acids (47,588 Da). Pex23p exhibits high sequence similarity to two hypothetical proteins of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pex23p is an integral membrane protein of peroxisomes that is completely, or nearly completely, sequestered from the cytosol. Pex23p is detected at low levels in cells grown in medium containing glucose, and its levels are significantly increased by growth in medium containing oleic acid, the metabolism of which requires intact peroxisomes.     

Dynamics of peroxisome assembly and function

Recent studies in human cells and in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica have shown that peroxisomes consist of numerous structurally distinct subcompartments that differ in their import competency for various proteins and are related through a time-ordered conversion of one subcompartment to another. Our studies have implicated the fusion of small peroxisomal precursors as an early event in the multistep assembly of peroxisomes operating in Y. lipolytica. Newly discovered unexpected roles for peroxisomes in specific developmental programs have expanded the remarkable plasticity of peroxisomal functions. Here, we highlight recent discoveries on the highly dynamic nature of peroxisome assembly and function and suggest questions for future research in these areas.     

Peroxisome biogenesis occurs in an unsynchronized manner in close association with the endoplasmic reticulum in temperature-sensitive Yarrowia lipolytica Pex3p mutants

Pex3p is a peroxisomal integral membrane protein required early in peroxisome biogenesis, and Pex3p-deficient cells lack identifiable peroxisomes. Two temperature-sensitive pex3 mutant strains of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica were made to investigate the role of Pex3p in the early stages of peroxisome biogenesis. In glucose medium at 16 degrees C, these mutants underwent de novo peroxisome biogenesis and exhibited early matrix protein sequestration into peroxisome-like structures found at the endoplasmic reticulum-rich periphery of cells or sometimes associated with nuclei. The de novo peroxisome biogenesis seemed unsynchronized, with peroxisomes occurring at different stages of development both within cells and between cells. Cells with peripheral nascent peroxisomes and cells with structures morphologically distinct from peroxisomes, such as semi/circular tubular structures that immunostained with antibodies to peroxisomal matrix proteins and to the endoplasmic reticulum-resident protein Kar2p, and that surrounded lipid droplets, were observed during up-regulation of peroxisome biogenesis in cells incubated in oleic acid medium at 16 degrees C. These structures were not detected in wild-type or Pex3p-deficient cells. Their role in peroxisome biogenesis remains unclear. Targeting of peroxisomal matrix proteins to these structures suggests that Pex3p directly or indirectly sequesters components of the peroxisome biogenesis machinery. Such a role is consistent with Pex3p overexpression producing cells with fewer, larger, and clustered peroxisomes.     

A subtle interplay between three Pex11 proteins shapes de novo formation and fission of peroxisomes

The organization of eukaryotic cells into membrane-bound compartments must be faithfully sustained for survival of the cell. A subtle equilibrium exists between the degradation and the proliferation of organelles. Commonly, proliferation is initiated by a membrane remodeling process. Here, we dissect the function of proteins driving organelle proliferation in the particular case of peroxisomes. These organelles are formed either through a growth and division process from existing peroxisomes or de novo from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Among the proteins involved in the biogenesis of peroxisomes, peroxins, members of the Pex11 protein family participate in peroxisomal membrane alterations. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Pex11 family consists of three proteins, Pex11p, Pex25p and Pex27p. Here we demonstrate that yeast mutants lacking peroxisomes require the presence of Pex25p to regenerate this organelle de novo. We also provide evidence showing that Pex27p inhibits peroxisomal function and illustrate that Pex25p initiates elongation of the peroxisomal membrane. Our data establish that although structurally conserved each of the three Pex11 protein family members plays a distinct role. While ScPex11p promotes the proliferation of peroxisomes already present in the cell, ScPex25p initiates remodeling at the peroxisomal membrane and ScPex27p acts to counter this activity. In addition, we reveal that ScPex25p acts in concert with Pex3p in the initiation of de novo peroxisome biogenesis from the ER.     

Peroxisomal membrane fusion requires two AAA family ATPases, Pex1p and Pex6p

Two AAA family ATPases, NSF and p97, have been implicated in membrane fusion during assembly and inheritance of organelles of the secretory pathway. We have now investigated the roles of AAA ATPases in membrane fusion during assembly of the peroxisome, an organelle outside the classical secretory system. Here, we show that peroxisomal membrane fusion in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica requires two AAA ATPases, Pex1p and Pex6p. Release of membrane- associated Pex1p and Pex6p drives the asymmetric priming of two fusion partners. The next step, peroxisome docking, requires release of Pex1p from one partner. Subsequent fusion of the peroxisomal membranes is independent of both Pex1p and Pex6p.     

Yarrowia lipolytica cells mutant for the PEX24 gene encoding a peroxisomal membrane peroxin mislocalize peroxisomal proteins and accumulate membrane structures containing both peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins

Peroxins are proteins required for peroxisome assembly and are encoded by the PEX genes. Functional complementation of the oleic acid-nonutilizing strain mut1-1 of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica has identified the novel gene, PEX24. PEX24 encodes Pex24p, a protein of 550 amino acids (61,100 Da). Pex24p is an integral membrane protein of peroxisomes that exhibits high sequence homology to two hypothetical proteins encoded by the open reading frames YHR150W and YDR479C of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Pex24p is detectable in wild-type cells grown in glucose-containing medium, and its levels are significantly increased by incubation of cells in oleic acid-containing medium, the metabolism of which requires intact peroxisomes. pex24 mutants are compromised in the targeting of both matrix and membrane proteins to peroxisomes. Although pex24 mutants fail to assemble functional peroxisomes, they do harbor membrane structures that contain subsets of peroxisomal proteins.     

Dynamin-dependent biogenesis, cell cycle regulation and mitochondrial association of peroxisomes in fission yeast

Peroxisomes were visualized for the first time in living fission yeast cells. In small, newly divided cells, the number of peroxisomes was low but increased in parallel with the increase in cell length/volume that accompanies cell cycle progression. In cells grown in oleic acid, both the size and the number of peroxisomes increased. The peroxisomal inventory of cells lacking the dynamin-related proteins Dnm1 or Vps1 was similar to that in wild type. By contrast, cells of the double mutant dnm1Delta vps1Delta contained either no peroxisomes at all or a small number of morphologically aberrant organelles. Peroxisomes exhibited either local Brownian movement or longer-range linear displacements, which continued in the absence of either microtubules or actin filaments. On the contrary, directed peroxisome motility appeared to occur in association with mitochondria and may be an indirect function of intrinsic mitochondrial dynamics. We conclude that peroxisomes are present in fission yeast and that Dnm1 and Vps1 act redundantly in peroxisome biogenesis, which is under cell cycle control. Peroxisome movement is independent of the cytoskeleton but is coupled to mitochondrial dynamics.     

Expression of the Cymbidium ringspot virus 33-kilodalton protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and molecular dissection of the peroxisomal targeting signal

Open reading frame 1 in the viral genome of Cymbidium ringspot virus encodes a 33-kDa protein (p33), which was previously shown to localize to the peroxisomal membrane in infected and transgenic plant cells. To determine the sequence requirements for the organelle targeting and membrane insertion, the protein was expressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in native form (33K) or fused to the green fluorescent protein (33KGFP). Cell organelles were identified by immunolabeling of marker proteins. In addition, peroxisomes were identified by simultaneous expression of the red fluorescent protein DsRed containing a peroxisomal targeting signal and mitochondria by using the dye MitoTracker. Fluorescence microscopy showed the 33KGFP fusion protein concentrated in a few large bodies colocalizing with peroxisomes. These bodies were shown by electron microscopy to be composed by aggregates of peroxisomes, a few mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) strands. In immunoelectron microscopy, antibodies to p33 labeled the peroxisomal clumps. Biochemical analysis suggested that p33 is anchored to the peroxisomal membrane through a segment of ca. 7 kDa, which corresponds to the sequence comprising two hydrophobic transmembrane domains and a hydrophilic interconnecting loop. Analysis of deletion mutants confirmed these domains as essential components of the p33 peroxisomal targeting signal, together with a cluster of three basic amino acids (KRR). In yeast mutants lacking peroxisomes p33 was detected in the ER. The possible involvement of the ER as an intermediate step for the integration of p33 into the peroxisomal membrane is discussed.     

In the yeast Hansenula polymorpha, peroxisome formation from the ER is independent of Pex19p, but involves the function of p24 proteins

The peroxin Pex19p is important for the formation of functional peroxisomal membranes. Here we show that Hansenula polymorpha Pex19p is also required for peroxisome inheritance. Peroxisome inheritance is partly defective when Pex19p farnesylation is blocked, whereas deletion of PEX19 resulted in a severe defect in partitioning of peroxisomal structures. Time lapse imaging revealed that in newly formed buds, which had not inherited a peroxisome from the mother cell, new peroxisomes are formed that derive from the nuclear envelope/endoplasmic reticulum. This process was impaired upon deletion of EMP24 and ERP3, genes that encode p24 proteins. p24 Proteins are components of coated vesicles that mediate trafficking between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. In an H. polymorpha wild-type background, deletion of EMP24 and ERP3 resulted in a strong reduction of organelle number in conjunction with an increase in the size of individual peroxisomes. This observation suggests that p24 proteins also play a role in peroxisome development in wild-type H. polymorpha cells.