Simultaneous Disruption of Two DNA Polymerases,Polη and Polζ, in Avian DT40 Cells Unmasks the Role of Polη in Cellular Response to Various DNA Lesions

Replicative DNA polymerases are frequently stalled by DNA lesions. The resulting replication blockage is released by homologous recombination (HR) and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). TLS employs specialized TLS polymerases to bypass DNA lesions. We provide striking in vivo evidence of the cooperation between DNA polymerase η, which is mutated in the variant form of the cancer predisposition disorder xeroderma pigmentosum (XP-V), and DNA polymerase ζ by generating POLη^−/−/POLζ^−/− cells from the chicken DT40 cell line. POLζ^−/− cells are hypersensitive to a very wide range of DNA damaging agents, whereas XP-V cells exhibit moderate sensitivity to ultraviolet light (UV) only in the presence of caffeine treatment and exhibit no significant sensitivity to any other damaging agents. It is therefore widely believed that Polη plays a very specific role in cellular tolerance to UV-induced DNA damage. The evidence we present challenges this assumption. The phenotypic analysis of POLη^−/−/POLζ^−/− cells shows that, unexpectedly, the loss of Polη significantly rescued all mutant phenotypes of POLζ^−/− cells and results in the restoration of the DNA damage tolerance by a backup pathway including HR. Taken together, Polη contributes to a much wide range of TLS events than had been predicted by the phenotype of XP-V cells.     

Role of DNA polymerase eta in the bypass of abasic sites in yeast cells

Abasic (AP) sites are major DNA lesions and are highly mutagenic. AP site-induced mutagenesis largely depends on translesion synthesis. We have examined the role of DNA polymerase η (Polη) in translesion synthesis of AP sites by replicating a plasmid containing a site-specific AP site in yeast cells. In wild-type cells, AP site bypass resulted in preferred C insertion (62%) over A insertion (21%), as well as −1 deletion (3%), and complex event (14%) containing multiple mutations. In cells lacking Polη (rad30), Rev1, Polζ (rev3), and both Polη and Polζ, translesion synthesis was reduced to 30%, 30%, 15% and 3% of the wild-type level, respectively. C insertion opposite the AP site was reduced in rad30 mutant cells and was abolished in cells lacking Rev1 or Polζ, but significant A insertion was still detected in these mutant cells. While purified yeast Polα effectively inserted an A opposite the AP site in vitro, purified yeast Polδ was much less effective in A insertion opposite the lesion due to its 3′→5′ proofreading exonuclease activity. Purified yeast Polη performed extension synthesis from the primer 3′ A opposite the lesion. These results show that Polη is involved in translesion synthesis of AP sites in yeast cells, and suggest that an important role of Polη is to catalyze extension following A insertion opposite the lesion. Consistent with these conclusions, rad30 mutant cells were sensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), and rev1 rad30 or rev3 rad30 double mutant cells were synergistically more sensitive to MMS than the respective single mutant strains.     

Different types of interaction between PCNA and PIP boxes contribute to distinct cellular functions of Y-family DNA polymerases

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) by the Y-family DNA polymerases Polη, Polι and Polκ, mediated via interaction with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), is a crucial pathway that protects human cells against DNA damage. We report that Polη has three PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) boxes (PIP1, 2, 3) that contribute differentially to two distinct functions, stimulation of DNA synthesis and promotion of PCNA ubiquitination. The latter function is strongly associated with formation of nuclear Polη foci, which co-localize with PCNA. We also show that Polκ has two functionally distinct PIP boxes, like Polη, whereas Polι has a single PIP box involved in stimulation of DNA synthesis. All three polymerases were additionally stimulated by mono-ubiquitinated PCNA in vitro. The three PIP boxes and a ubiquitin-binding zinc-finger of Polη exert redundant and additive effects in vivo via distinct molecular mechanisms. These findings provide an integrated picture of the orchestration of TLS polymerases.     

Redundancy of mammalian Y family DNA polymerases in cellular responses to genomic DNA lesions induced by ultraviolet light

Short-wave ultraviolet light induces both mildly helix-distorting cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and severely distorting (6–4) pyrimidine pyrimidone photoproducts ((6–4)PPs). The only DNA polymerase (Pol) that is known to replicate efficiently across CPDs is Polη, a member of the Y family of translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases. Phenotypes of Polη deficiency are transient, suggesting redundancy with other DNA damage tolerance pathways. Here we performed a comprehensive analysis of the temporal requirements of Y-family Pols ι and κ as backups for Polη in (i) bypassing genomic CPD and (6–4)PP lesions in vivo, (ii) suppressing DNA damage signaling, (iii) maintaining cell cycle progression and (iv) promoting cell survival, by using mouse embryonic fibroblast lines with single and combined disruptions in these Pols. The contribution of Polι is restricted to TLS at a subset of the photolesions. Polκ plays a dominant role in rescuing stalled replication forks in Polη-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, both at CPDs and (6–4)PPs. This dampens DNA damage signaling and cell cycle arrest, and results in increased survival. The role of relatively error-prone Pols ι and κ as backups for Polη contributes to the understanding of the mutator phenotype of xeroderma pigmentosum variant, a syndrome caused by Polη defects.     

Roles of PCNA ubiquitination and TLS polymerases κ and η in the bypass of methyl methanesulfonate-induced DNA damage

Translesion synthesis (TLS) provides a highly conserved mechanism that enables DNA synthesis on a damaged template. TLS is performed by specialized DNA polymerases of which polymerase (Pol) κ is important for the cellular response to DNA damage induced by benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE), ultraviolet (UV) light and the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). As TLS polymerases are intrinsically error-prone, tight regulation of their activity is required. One level of control is provided by ubiquitination of the homotrimeric DNA clamp PCNA at lysine residue 164 (PCNA-Ub). We here show that Polκ can function independently of PCNA modification and that Polη can function as a backup during TLS of MMS-induced lesions. Compared to cell lines deficient for PCNA modification (Pcna^K164R) or Polκ, double mutant cell lines display hypersensitivity to MMS but not to BPDE or UV-C. Double mutant cells also displayed delayed post-replicative TLS, accumulate higher levels of replication stress and delayed S-phase progression. Furthermore, we show that Polη and Polκ are redundant in the DNA damage bypass of MMS-induced DNA damage. Taken together, we provide evidence for PCNA-Ub-independent activation of Polκ and establish Polη as an important backup polymerase in the absence of Polκ in response to MMS-induced DNA damage.     

FF483–484 motif of human Polη mediates its interaction with the POLD2 subunit of Polδ and contributes to DNA damage tolerance

Switching between replicative and translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases are crucial events for the completion of genomic DNA synthesis when the replication machinery encounters lesions in the DNA template. In eukaryotes, the translesional DNA polymerase η (Polη) plays a central role for accurate bypass of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, the predominant DNA lesions induced by ultraviolet irradiation. Polη deficiency is responsible for a variant form of the Xeroderma pigmentosum (XPV) syndrome, characterized by a predisposition to skin cancer. Here, we show that the FF_483–484 amino acids in the human Polη (designated F1 motif) are necessary for the interaction of this TLS polymerase with POLD2, the B subunit of the replicative DNA polymerase δ, both in vitro and in vivo. Mutating this motif impairs Polη function in the bypass of both an N-2-acetylaminofluorene adduct and a TT-CPD lesion in cellular extracts. By complementing XPV cells with different forms of Polη, we show that the F1 motif contributes to the progression of DNA synthesis and to the cell survival after UV irradiation. We propose that the integrity of the F1 motif of Polη, necessary for the Polη/POLD2 interaction, is required for the establishment of an efficient TLS complex.     

In vivo evidence for translesion synthesis by the replicative DNA polymerase δ

The intolerance of DNA polymerase δ (Polδ) to incorrect base pairing contributes to its extremely high accuracy during replication, but is believed to inhibit translesion synthesis (TLS). However, chicken DT40 cells lacking the POLD3 subunit of Polδ are deficient in TLS. Previous genetic and biochemical analysis showed that POLD3 may promote lesion bypass by Polδ itself independently of the translesion polymerase Polζ of which POLD3 is also a subunit. To test this hypothesis, we have inactivated Polδ proofreading in pold3 cells. This significantly restored TLS in pold3 mutants, enhancing dA incorporation opposite abasic sites. Purified proofreading-deficient human Polδ holoenzyme performs TLS of abasic sites in vitro much more efficiently than the wild type enzyme, with over 90% of TLS events resulting in dA incorporation. Furthermore, proofreading deficiency enhances the capability of Polδ to continue DNA synthesis over UV lesions both in vivo and in vitro. These data support Polδ contributing to TLS in vivo and suggest that the mutagenesis resulting from loss of Polδ proofreading activity may in part be explained by enhanced lesion bypass.     

Cryo-EM reveals conformational flexibility in apo DNA polymerase ζ

The translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases Rev1 and Polζ function together in DNA lesion bypass during DNA replication, acting as nucleotide inserter and extender polymerases, respectively. While the structural characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polζ in its DNA-bound state has illuminated how this enzyme synthesizes DNA, a mechanistic understanding of TLS also requires probing conformational changes associated with DNA- and Rev1 binding. Here, we used single-particle cryo-electron microscopy to determine the structure of the apo Polζ holoenzyme. We show that compared with its DNA-bound state, apo Polζ displays enhanced flexibility that correlates with concerted motions associated with expansion of the Polζ DNA-binding channel upon DNA binding. We also identified a lysine residue that obstructs the DNA-binding channel in apo Polζ, suggesting a gating mechanism. The Polζ subunit Rev7 is a hub protein that directly binds Rev1 and is a component of several other protein complexes such as the shieldin DNA double-strand break repair complex. We analyzed the molecular interactions of budding yeast Rev7 in the context of Polζ and those of human Rev7 in the context of shieldin using a crystal structure of Rev7 bound to a fragment of the shieldin-3 protein. Overall, our study provides new insights into Polζ mechanism of action and the manner in which Rev7 recognizes partner proteins.     

Genetic Control of Replication through N1-methyladenine in Human Cells

N1-methyl adenine (1-MeA) is formed in DNA by reaction with alkylating agents and naturally occurring methyl halides. The 1-MeA lesion impairs Watson-Crick base pairing and blocks normal DNA replication. Here we identify the translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases (Pols) required for replicating through 1-MeA in human cells and show that TLS through this lesion is mediated via three different pathways in which Pols ι and θ function in one pathway and Pols η and ζ, respectively, function in the other two pathways. Our biochemical studies indicate that in the Polι/Polθ pathway, Polι would carry out nucleotide insertion opposite 1-MeA from which Polθ would extend synthesis. In the Polη pathway, this Pol alone would function at both the nucleotide insertion and extension steps of TLS, and in the third pathway, Polζ would extend from the nucleotide inserted opposite 1-MeA by an as yet unidentified Pol. Whereas by pushing 1-MeA into the syn conformation and by forming Hoogsteen base pair with the T residue, Polι would carry out TLS opposite 1-MeA, the ability of Polη to replicate through 1-MeA suggests that despite its need for Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding, Polη can stabilize the adduct in its active site. Remarkably, even though Pols η and ι are quite error-prone at inserting nucleotides opposite 1-MeA, TLS opposite this lesion in human cells occurs in a highly error-free fashion. This suggests that the in vivo fidelity of TLS Pols is regulated by factors such as post-translational modifications, protein-protein interactions, and possibly others.     

Complex formation of yeast Rev1 with DNA polymerase eta

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rev1 functions in translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) together with polymerase ζ (Polζ), comprised of the Rev3 catalytic and Rev7 accessory subunits. Rev1 plays an indispensable structural role in promoting Polζ function, and deletion of the Rev1-C terminal region that is involved in physical interactions with Rev3 inactivates Polζ function in TLS. In humans, however, Rev1 has been shown to physically interact with the Y-family polymerases Polη, Polι, and Polκ, and the Rev1 C terminus mediates these interactions. Since all the available genetic and biochemical evidence in yeast support the requirement of Rev1 as a structural element for Polζ and not for Polη, these observations have raised the possibility that in its structural role, Rev1 has diverged between yeast and humans. Here we show that although in yeast a stable Rev1-Polη complex can be formed, this complex formation involves the polymerase-associated domain of Rev1 and not the Rev1 C terminus as in humans. We also found that the DNA synthesis activity of Rev1 is enhanced in this complex. We discuss the implications of these and other observations for the possible divergence of Rev1's structural role between yeast and humans.     

Mutagenic effects of abasic and oxidized abasic lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2-Deoxyribonolactone (L) and 2-deoxyribose (AP) are abasic sites that are produced by ionizing radiation, reactive oxygen species and a variety of DNA damaging agents. The biological processing of the AP site has been examined in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, nothing is known about how L is processed in this organism. We determined the bypass and mutagenic specificity of DNA containing an abasic site (AP and L) or the AP analog tetrahydrofuran (F) using an oligonucleotide transformation assay. The tetrahydrofuran analog and L were bypassed at 10-fold higher frequencies than the AP lesions. Bypass frequencies of lesions were greatly reduced in the absence of Rev1 or Polζ (rev3 mutant), but were only marginally reduced in the absence of Polη (rad30 mutant). Deoxycytidine was the preferred nucleotide inserted opposite an AP site whereas dA and dC were inserted at equal frequencies opposite F and L sites. In the rev1 and rev3 strains, dA was the predominant nucleotide inserted opposite these lesions. Overall, we conclude that both Rev1 and Polζ are required for the efficient bypass of abasic sites in yeast.     

DNA Polymerase ζ-Dependent Lesion Bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Accompanied by Error-Prone Copying of Long Stretches of Adjacent DNA

Translesion synthesis (TLS) helps cells to accomplish chromosomal replication in the presence of unrepaired DNA lesions. In eukaryotes, the bypass of most lesions involves a nucleotide insertion opposite the lesion by either a replicative or a specialized DNA polymerase, followed by extension of the resulting distorted primer terminus by DNA polymerase ζ (Polζ). The subsequent events leading to disengagement of the error-prone Polζ from the primer terminus and its replacement with an accurate replicative DNA polymerase remain largely unknown. As a first step toward understanding these events, we aimed to determine the length of DNA stretches synthesized in an error-prone manner during the Polζ-dependent lesion bypass. We developed new in vivo assays to identify the products of mutagenic TLS through a plasmid-borne tetrahydrofuran lesion and a UV-induced chromosomal lesion. We then surveyed the region downstream of the lesion site (in respect to the direction of TLS) for the presence of mutations indicative of an error-prone polymerase activity. The bypass of both lesions was associated with an approximately 300,000-fold increase in the mutation rate in the adjacent DNA segment, in comparison to the mutation rate during normal replication. The hypermutated tract extended 200 bp from the lesion in the plasmid-based assay and as far as 1 kb from the lesion in the chromosome-based assay. The mutation rate in this region was similar to the rate of errors produced by purified Polζ during copying of undamaged DNA in vitro. Further, no mutations downstream of the lesion were observed in rare TLS products recovered from Polζ-deficient cells. This led us to conclude that error-prone Polζ synthesis continues for several hundred nucleotides after the lesion bypass is completed. These results provide insight into the late steps of TLS and show that error-prone TLS tracts span a substantially larger region than previously appreciated.     

Translesion synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase ζ from templates containing lesions of ultraviolet radiation and acetylaminofluorene

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA polymerase ζ (Polζ) is required in a major lesion bypass pathway. To help understand the role of Polζ in lesion bypass, we have performed in vitro biochemical analyses of this polymerase in response to several DNA lesions. Purified yeast Polζ performed limited translesion synthesis opposite a template TT (6-4) photoproduct, incorporating A or T with similar efficiencies (and less frequently G) opposite the 3′ T, and predominantly A opposite the 5′ T. Purified yeast Polζ predominantly incorporated a G opposite an acetylaminofluorene (AAF)-adducted guanine. The lesion, however, significantly inhibited subsequent extension. Furthermore, yeast Polζ catalyzed extension DNA synthesis from primers annealed opposite the AAF-guanine and the 3′ T of the TT (6-4) photoproduct with varying efficiencies. Extension synthesis was more efficient when A or C was opposite the AAF-guanine, and when G was opposite the 3′ T of the TT (6-4) photoproduct. In contrast, the 3′ T of a cis–syn TT dimer completely blocked purified yeast Polζ, whereas the 5′ T was readily bypassed. These results support the following dual-function model of Polζ. First, Polζ catalyzes nucleotide incorporation opposite AAF-guanine and TT (6-4) photoproduct with a limited efficiency. Secondly, more efficient bypass of these lesions may require nucleotide incorporation by other DNA polymerases followed by extension DNA synthesis by Polζ.     

Differential Roles for DNA Polymerases Eta,Zeta, and REV1 in Lesion Bypass of Intrastrand versus Interstrand DNA Cross-Links

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a process whereby specialized DNA polymerases are recruited to bypass DNA lesions that would otherwise stall high-fidelity polymerases. We provide evidence that TLS across cisplatin intrastrand cross-links is performed by multiple translesion DNA polymerases. First, we determined that PCNA monoubiquitination by RAD18 is necessary for efficient bypass of cisplatin adducts by the TLS polymerases eta (Polη), REV1, and zeta (Polζ) based on the observations that depletion of these proteins individually leads to decreased cell survival, cell cycle arrest in S phase, and activation of the DNA damage response. Second, we showed that in addition to PCNA monoubiquitination by RAD18, the Fanconi anemia core complex is also important for recruitment of REV1 to stalled replication forks in cisplatin treated cells. Third, we present evidence that REV1 and Polζ are uniquely associated with protection against cisplatin and mitomycin C-induced chromosomal aberrations, and both are necessary for the timely resolution of DNA double-strand breaks associated with repair of DNA interstrand cross-links. Together, our findings indicate that REV1 and Polζ facilitate repair of interstrand cross-links independently of PCNA monoubiquitination and Polη, whereas RAD18 plus Polη, REV1, and Polζ are all necessary for replicative bypass of cisplatin intrastrand DNA cross-links.Maintenance of genomic integrity involves the activation of cell cycle checkpoints coupled with DNA repair. Despite these sophisticated mechanisms to remove DNA lesions prior to DNA replication, replication forks may inevitably encounter nonrepaired lesions that block high fidelity polymerases, potentially leading to replication fork instability, gaps in replicated DNA, and the generation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In order to preserve replication fork stability by allowing replication through polymerase blocking lesions, template DNA containing a damaged base or abasic site can be replicated through the actions of specialized translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerases (61). A key event in the regulation of TLS is the monoubiquitination of PCNA, a homotrimeric protein that functions as an auxiliary factor for DNA polymerases (28, 31, 57, 60). The RAD6 (E2)-RAD18 (E3) complex specifically monoubiquitinates PCNA on Lys-164 in response to replication fork stalling. This event is thought to operate as a molecular switch from normal DNA replication to the TLS pathway based on the observations that association of Y-family TLS polymerases with monoubiquitinated PCNA is strengthened through the cooperative binding of one or more ubiquitin-binding domains (UBM or UBZ) plus a PCNA-interacting domain (6, 25).Extensive biochemical evidence suggests that replication through a large variety of lesions requires the sequential action of two TLS polymerases (44). The Y-family polymerase eta (Polη) plays a key role in the efficient and error-free bypass of cyclobutane pyrimidine (TT) dimers, one of the major lesions resulting from exposure to UV radiation (45). In contrast, Polη can only insert a nucleotide directly opposite other lesions and requires an additional TLS polymerase, such as Polζ, to extend beyond the insertion (45). Polζ is comprised of the REV3 catalytic subunit that shares homology with B-family polymerases plus the REV7 accessory subunit (34). Polζ is unusual compared to other TLS polymerases due to the fact that it is relatively efficient at extending beyond mispaired primer termini and nucleotides inserted opposite a variety of DNA lesions, although this may occur in a potentially mutagenic manner (45). Genetic evidence in yeast suggest that Polζ activity is regulated by the Y family REV1 polymerase (21). In addition to a UBM domain that directly interacts with monoubiquitinated PCNA, REV1 possesses an N-terminal BRCT motif that directly contacts PCNA and potentially other proteins (24, 25). In addition, REV1 possesses a unique protein interaction domain in its carboxy terminus that interacts with the Polζ accessory subunit, REV7, and other TLS polymerases, including Polη and the Polζ catalytic subunit, REV3 (1, 18, 23, 40, 58). The characterization of these protein-protein interaction domains has led to the proposal that REV1 facilitates polymerase switching from a polymerase that directly inserts a nucleotide opposite a damaged base and Polζ, which subsequently performs the extension step beyond the inserted nucleotide opposite the damaged base (21).In addition to facilitating direct lesion bypass and filling in postreplicative gaps in DNA, REV1 and Polζ may also play an important role in the repair of interstrand cross-links (46, 63). Deletion of REV1, REV3, or REV7 in chicken DT40 cells leads to remarkable hypersensitivity to a wide variety of genotoxic stresses, most notably cisplatin and other DNA cross-linking agents such as mitomycin C (MMC) (38, 41, 55, 56). The genetic epistasis observed between REV1, REV3, and the Fanconi anemia (FA) complementation group C (FANCC) gene for cisplatin sensitivity further implicates TLS in the interstrand cross-link repair pathway (38). Current models suggest that when two replication forks converge upon an interstrand cross-link, the MUS81-EME1 endonuclease recognizes and cleaves the resulting branched DNA structure by making an incision at one side of the interstrand cross-link creating a replication-associated DSB (26). The XPF-ERCC1 endonuclease uncouples the cross-linked cDNA strands by making an incision on the other side of the interstrand cross-link (37). Recent biochemical evidence suggests that Polζ performs DNA synthesis opposite the DNA strand containing the residual cross-link and this process may be necessary to prepare the daughter strand for subsequent homologous recombination repair of the replication-associated DSB (46).Agents that introduce intra- and interstrand cross-links are widely used in cancer chemotherapy, and thus understanding the means by which cells repair or cope with these lesions will be instrumental in identifying novel mechanisms leading to drug resistance and designing new agents refractory to DNA damage tolerance mechanisms. Polη, REV1, and Polζ have all been implicated in mediating TLS past cisplatin intrastrand cross-links since lowering their expression increases sensitivity and reduces cisplatin-induced mutagenesis in human cancer cells (2, 5, 12, 42, 62). Furthermore, biochemical and structural analyses of Polη identified this polymerase as being capable of efficiently inserting dCTP opposite the 3′dG of a 1,2-d(GpG) cisplatin intrastrand cross-link (3). Here, we demonstrate that RAD18, Polη, and REV1 all localized to sites of replication stress marked by PCNA and γ-H2AX foci after treatment of cells with cisplatin. However, REV1 focus formation is specifically dependent upon both RAD18 and a functional FA core complex, suggesting FA core proteins are also necessary for directing REV1 to cisplatin-induced stalled replication forks. In addition, depletion of RAD18, Polη, REV1, or Polζ proteins lead to the induction of cellular responses indicative of inefficient lesion bypass of cisplatin adducts. Unexpectedly, we found that REV1- or Polζ-depleted cells displayed a greater loss in cell viability and the accumulation of chromosome aberrations and failed to resolve DSBs after cisplatin treatment. These results lead us to hypothesize that REV1 and Polζ may be necessary for the repair of cisplatin interstrand cross-links in addition to performing lesion bypass of cisplatin intrastrand cross-links. In agreement with this concept, we found that REV1 and Polζ-depleted cells were uniquely hypersensitive to MMC, accumulated greater numbers of chromosome aberrations, and failed to resolve replication-associated DSBs induced by MMC treatment.Together our findings support a model where replicative bypass of cisplatin intrastrand cross-links requires cooperation of multiple TLS polymerases in mammalian cells and is triggered by PCNA monoubiquitination. Our results also provide evidence that REV1 and Polζ facilitate repair of interstrand cross-links in human cells, and this process is likely independent of PCNA monoubiquitination.     

Photo-activatable Ub-PCNA probes reveal new structural features of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polη/PCNA complex

The Y-family DNA polymerase η (Polη) is critical for the synthesis past damaged DNA nucleotides in yeast through translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). TLS is initiated by monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the subsequent recruitment of TLS polymerases. Although individual structures of the Polη catalytic core and PCNA have been solved, a high-resolution structure of the complex of Polη/PCNA or Polη/monoubiquitinated PCNA (Ub-PCNA) still remains elusive, partly due to the disordered Polη C-terminal region and the flexibility of ubiquitin on PCNA. To circumvent these obstacles and obtain structural insights into this important TLS polymerase complex, we developed photo-activatable PCNA and Ub-PCNA probes containing a p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine (pBpa) crosslinker at selected positions on PCNA. By photo-crosslinking the probes with full-length Polη, specific crosslinking sites were identified following tryptic digestion and tandem mass spectrometry analysis. We discovered direct interactions of the Polη catalytic core and its C-terminal region with both sides of the PCNA ring. Model building using the crosslinking site information as a restraint revealed multiple conformations of Polη in the polymerase complex. Availability of the photo-activatable PCNA and Ub-PCNA probes will also facilitate investigations into other PCNA-containing complexes important for DNA replication, repair and damage tolerance.     

Polymerase η suppresses telomere defects induced by DNA damaging agents

Telomeres at chromosome ends are normally masked from proteins that signal and repair DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Bulky DNA lesions can cause DSBs if they block DNA replication, unless they are bypassed by translesion (TLS) DNA polymerases. Here, we investigated roles for TLS polymerase η, (polη) in preserving telomeres following acute physical UVC exposure and chronic chemical Cr(VI) exposure, which both induce blocking lesions. We report that polη protects against cytotoxicity and replication stress caused by Cr(VI), similar to results with ultraviolet C light (UVC). Both exposures induce ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase and polη accumulation into nuclear foci and localization to individual telomeres, consistent with replication fork stalling at DNA lesions. Polη-deficient cells exhibited greater numbers of telomeres that co-localized with DSB response proteins after exposures. Furthermore, the genotoxic exposures induced telomere aberrations associated with failures in telomere replication that were suppressed by polη. We propose that polη''s ability to bypass bulky DNA lesions at telomeres is critical for proper telomere replication following genotoxic exposures.     

DNA-damage tolerance mediated by PCNA?Ub fusions in human cells is dependent on Rev1 but not Polη

In response to replication-blocking lesions, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) can be sequentially ubiquitinated at the K164 residue, leading to two modes of DNA-damage tolerance, namely, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and error-free lesion bypass. Although the majority of reported data support a model whereby monoubiquitinated PCNA enhances its affinity for TLS polymerases and hence recruits them to the damage sites, this model has also been challenged by several observations. In this study, we expressed the PCNA-164R and ubiquitin (UB) fusion genes in an inducible manner in an attempt to mimic PCNA monoubiquitination in cultured human cells. It was found that expression of both N- and C-terminal PCNA•Ub fusions conferred significant tolerance to ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage. Surprisingly, depletion of Polη, a TLS polymerase dedicated to bypassing UV-induced pyrimidine dimers, did not alter tolerance conferred by PCNA•Ub. In contrast, depletion of Rev1, another TLS polymerase serving as a scaffold for the assembly of the TLS complex, completely abolished PCNA•Ub-mediated damage tolerance. Similar genetic interactions were confirmed when UV-induced monoubiquitination of endogenous PCNA is abolished by RAD18 deletion. Hence, PCNA•Ub fusions bypass the requirement for PCNA monoubiquitination, and UV damage tolerance conferred by these fusions is dependent on Rev1 but independent of Polη.     

Role of the ubiquitin-binding domain of Polη in Rad18-independent translesion DNA synthesis in human cell extracts

In eukaryotic cells, the Rad6/Rad18-dependent monoubiquitination of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays an essential role in the switching between replication and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). The DNA polymerase Polη binds to PCNA via a consensus C-terminal PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) motif. It also specifically interacts with monoubiquitinated PCNA thanks to a recently identified ubiquitin-binding domain (UBZ). To investigate whether the TLS activity of Polη is always coupled to PCNA monoubiquitination, we monitor the ability of cell-free extracts to perform DNA synthesis across different types of lesions. We observe that a cis-syn cyclobutane thymine dimer (TT-CPD), but not a N-2-acetylaminofluorene-guanine (G-AAF) adduct, is efficiently bypassed in extracts from Rad18-deficient cells, thus demonstrating the existence of a Polη-dependent and Rad18-independent TLS pathway. In addition, by complementing Polη-deficient cells with PIP and UBZ mutants, we show that each of these domains contributes to Polη activity. The finding that the bypass of a CPD lesion in vitro does not require Ub-PCNA but nevertheless depends on the UBZ domain of Polη, reveals that this domain may play a novel role in the TLS process that is not related to the monoubiquitination status of PCNA.     

Error-free and error-prone lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase kappa in vitro

Error-free lesion bypass and error-prone lesion bypass are important cellular responses to DNA damage during replication, both of which require a DNA polymerase (Pol). To identify lesion bypass DNA polymerases, we have purified human Polκ encoded by the DINB1 gene and examined its response to damaged DNA templates. Here, we show that human Polκ is a novel lesion bypass polymerase in vitro. Purified human Polκ efficiently bypassed a template 8-oxoguanine, incorporating mainly A and less frequently C opposite the lesion. Human Polκ most frequently incorporated A opposite a template abasic site. Efficient further extension required T as the next template base, and was mediated mainly by a one-nucleotide deletion mechanism. Human Polκ was able to bypass an acetylaminofluorene-modified G in DNA, incorporating either C or T, and less efficiently A opposite the lesion. Furthermore, human Polκ effectively bypassed a template (–)-trans-anti-benzo[a]pyrene-N²-dG lesion in an error-free manner by incorporating a C opposite the bulky adduct. In contrast, human Polκ was unable to bypass a template TT dimer or a TT (6-4) photoproduct, two of the major UV lesions. These results suggest that Polκ plays an important role in both error-free and error-prone lesion bypass in humans.     

A role for PCNA2 in translesion synthesis by Arabidopsis thaliana DNA polymerase η

Eukaryotic DNA polymerase η (Polη) confers ultraviolet (UV) resistance by catalyzing translesion synthesis (TLS) past UV photoproducts. Polη has been studied extensively in budding yeast and mammalian cells, where its interaction with monoubiquitylated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is necessary for its biological activity. Recently, in collaboration with other investigators, our laboratory demonstrated that Arabidopsis thaliana Polη is required for UV resistance in plants. Furthermore, the purified enzyme can perform TLS opposite a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer and interacts with PCNA. Intriguingly, the biological activity of Polη in a heterologous yeast assay depends on co-expression with Arabidopsis PCNA2 and Polη sequences implicated in binding PCNA or ubiquitin. We suggest that interaction of Arabidopsis Polη with ubiquitylated PCNA2 is required for TLS past UV photoproducts by Polη.Key words: polymerase η, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, translesion synthesis, ubiquitin, Arabidopsis thaliana, ultraviolet radiationUltraviolet (UV)-induced pyrimidine dimers can block the progression of DNA replication forks potentially disrupting the replication machinery and resulting in cell death. For this reason, cells have evolved non-essential, low fidelity DNA polymerases (Pols) capable of copying damaged templates,^1,2 a process termed translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). In budding yeast, TLS past UV photoproducts is catalyzed by Polη and Polζ (composed of the Rev3 catalytic and Rev7 accessory subunits), but also involves the Rev1 protein in an as yet undetermined role linked to Polζ.^1,3,4 Yeast and human Polη replicates cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), in particular thymine-thymine (TT) CPDs, in a relatively error-free manner whereas Polζ is essential for UV mutagenesis implicating it in error-prone TLS.^1,4,5Both UV resistance due to TLS and the polymerases responsible have been well-studied in yeast and mammalian cells over the past decade. Only more recently has evidence emerged that TLS may also contribute to UV resistance in plants. Arabidopsis thaliana POLH, REV1, REV3 and REV7 encode homologs of Polη, Rev1, Rev3 and Rev7, respectively.^6–10 T-DNA insertions in POLH, REV1 or REV3 sensitise root growth to acute UV doses,^6–8,10 and these mutations, as well as inactivation of REV7, increase the sensitivity of whole plants to longer term UV treatment.^6,8 Interestingly, polh rev3 double mutants show an additive increase in UV sensitivity over that observed for polh and rev3 single mutants,^6,10 potentially pointing to differences in the UV photoproducts bypassed by the two polymerases. That the enhanced UV sensitivity of the mutants may reflect a TLS deficiency is suggested by the finding that purified Arabidopsis Polη catalyzes primer extension and TLS past a TT CPD in vitro.⁶For TLS to occur, Polη must gain access to the replication machinery arrested at a UV photoproduct. It does so in yeast and mammalian cells by interacting with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the eukaryotic sliding clamp required for processive DNA replication.^1,3,11, DNA damage or stalling of the replicative polymerase triggers monoubiquitylation of PCNA at lysine 164 by a complex of the E2 ubiquitin conjugase Rad6 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Rad18.^1,3,11,12 This modification increases the affinity of Polη for PCNA, with which it interacts via a single PCNA interacting peptide (PIP) box and a single ubiquitin-binding zinc finger (UBZ) domain.^1,3In contrast to its yeast and mammalian counterparts, Polη from Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa (rice) has two PIP boxes and lacks a UBZ.^6,9,10 Instead the two polymerases each possess two ubiquitin-binding motifs (UBMs) similar to those present in the Arabidopsis Rev1 protein and a vertebrate TLS polymerase, Pol., for which there is no homolog in Arabidopsis.^6,13 Considerable differences in the sequences flanking the UBMs in Polη and Rev1 argue that Polη did not acquire its UBMs from Rev1, and so, although perhaps unique to plant Polη, their origin remains a mystery.The presence of PCNA- and ubiquitin-binding sequences in plant Polη hint that it may operate in TLS in a manner similar to that for Polη from yeast or mammalian cells. Indeed, three lines of evidence⁶ lead us to suggest that the Polη PIP boxes and UBMs likely function in binding ubiquitylated PCNA and this interaction is probably required for TLS past UV photoproducts by Arabidopsis Polη. First, Arabidopsis Polη interacts physically and in yeast two-hybrid assays with Arabidopsis PCNA1 and PCNA2. Second, expression in yeast of Arabidopsis cDNAs encoding Polη and PCNA2, but not PCNA1, fully complements the UV sensitivity conferred by elimination of yeast Polη. In vitro mutagenesis suggests the inability of Polη plus PCNA1 to restore UV resistance is due to a lysine at position 201 in PCNA1 but not PCNA2. In the three-dimensional structure of PCNA, amino acid 201 lies adjacent to lysine-164, the residue that is ubiquitylated in yeast and human PCNA. Thus, one possibility is that lysine-201 in PCNA1 prevents complementation of UV sensitivity by inhibiting ubiquitylation of lysine-164. Third, altering presumed critical residues in either of the two PIP boxes or UBM2 in Arabidopsis Polη also prevents restoration of UV resistance in Polη-deficient yeast cells.Several important parts of the puzzle remain to be solved. In particular, the ubiquitylation of plant PCNA has yet to be demonstrated, and the identity of the proteins that might monoubiquitylate plant PCNA is uncertain. Although Arabidopsis Rad6 homologs can ubiquitylate target proteins in vitro, there is no evidence that Arabidopsis PCNA1 or PCNA2 is a substrate, and Arabidopsis lacks a Rad18 homolog.^14,15 Finally, if PCNA is ubiquitylated in planta, does this occur at lysine-164 in response to DNA damage or replication fork stalling, is the interaction of Polη with PCNA stimulated by this modification, and is an enhanced interaction mediated by the Polη UBMs?