广西柳江土博甘前洞的铀系年代

本文报道晚期智人化石地点广西柳江博甘前洞新生碳酸盐岩和骨化石样的铀系测年结果。该地点表层钙板在约94Ka前开始形成,含化石粘土堆积叠压的钙板年代为约20ka,人牙化石应位于二者之间。二个动物化石样的二种铀系法年代范围为85－139ka,表明该地点与含化石堆积与表层钙板间无地层倒序现象,支持人牙化石大于100ka的结论。邻近的柳江晚期智人化石地点和柳州白莲洞人类遗址铀系测年的结果与本文一致。具现代解剖特征智人在中国南方出现的时间,很可能不晚于西非和非洲。在现代人类起源方面,中国不应是远离中心、滞后和被取代的地区。     

古人类遗址湖北郧西黄龙洞的铀系年代

湖北郧西黄龙洞为近年来发现的晚期智人遗址。本文报道该地点具明确层位意义的洞穴次生碳酸盐岩和骨化石样铀系测年的结果。含文化堆积下伏一局部钙板的年代为约100ka BP, 其中部偏上一局部钙板为约77ka BP, 表层钙板形成于27—57ka BP间。人类化石和石制品出土于文化堆积的底部, 其年代应在57—100ka BP, 并很可能在77—100ka BP间。与人牙化石同层的四枚犀牛牙化石在35—72ka BP间, 与基于次生碳酸盐岩的年代框架没有冲突。本文结果为中国现代人类的早期出现和距今40—100ka BP间有人类活动提供了有力证据。     

北京猿人遗址年代上限再研究

本文报道了取于北京猿人遗址第1-2层的二个钙板样的铀系年龄。下列实验证据支持数据的可信度：二个样品的定年结果在误差范围内一致且230Th/234U值均接近平衡;BZC-3样三次230Th/234U年龄测定获一致结果;230Th/234U和227Th/230Th二法对照的结果表明BZC-3样构成封闭体系。基于BZC-3样三次平行分析所得同位素比值的加权平均值,提出北京猿人遗址的上限年龄应为 万年。     

桐梓人遗址岩灰洞的铀系年龄

测定了岩灰洞钟乳石和骨化石样的230Th/234U和227Th/230Th年龄。覆盖整个洞穴的表层钙板为20.6万年,位于三、四堆积层之下的流石和石笋为24.0万年。含化石和文化遗物的堆积物在这二个洞穴碳酸钙生长期间形成,因此应划为中更新世晚期,桐梓人应属晚期直立人。基于地层顺序和二种铀系年龄对照,讨论了钟乳石和骨化石铀系年龄的可信度。     

广西扶绥南山洞新发现的人类化石和蒙古野驴化石——末次冰期华南气候变化的哺乳动物化石新证据

广西扶绥县南山洞发现人类化石及哺乳动物化石。人类化石包括2枚智人牙齿化石,分别是左下第三臼齿和右下第二臼齿,其形态特征与广西其他山洞发现的智人化石相似,归入晚期智人。哺乳动物化石多为华南大熊猫———剑齿象动物群成员,时代属更新世晚期。该地点新发现的蒙古野驴化石属华南晚更新世动物群的首次发现。南山洞所有化石发现于洞内浅褐色砂质粘土中,堆积物第二层钙板层的铀系年龄为30—40ka。蒙古野驴的出现暗示中国南方大陆可能在末次冰期出现过干冷的气候环境。     

巢县人年代位置新证据及其意义

本文银山地点钟乳石和骨石样的铀系年代。根据位于第２层顶部一钙板样３次分析的平均值,巢县人的上限年龄应为３１万年,据此似可将这一人类化石从目前分类的早期智人改划为晚期直立人。讨论了钟乳石铀系年代的可信度。银山下部地层骨化石样的分析结果,可引为二法一致的骨化石铀系年龄不足以保证数据真实的例证。     

周口店北京猿人洞骨化石铀系年龄数据——混合模式

铀系混合模式得出北京猿人在第一地点生活的年代是距今50万年到23万年。通过周口店猿人洞堆积物骨化石中 Th~(230)/U~(234)和 U~(234)/U~(232)的测定,建立铀系混合模式,给出下列年龄值:第1—3层距今23万年,6—7层距今35万年,8—9层大于40万年,12层距今50万年前或更早。一些中间层位的Th~(230)/U~(234)比值测定年龄偏低,可能是近20万年以来铀发生迁移造成的。     

安徽省和县和巢县古人类地点的铀系法年代测定和研究

用不平衡铀系法测定了安徽省和县和巢县人化石地点哺乳动物骨化石样品的年代。所得封闭样品的年代值分别集中在15—19和16—20万年范围内。但在两个地点均不排除年代值为二十多万年的骨化石样品存在的可能。所有被测样品均检验了对铀的封闭性。     

用铀子系法测定河套人和萨拉乌苏文化的年代

用铀子系法中的~(230)Th增长法测定了河套人与萨拉乌苏文化的年代。并用~(231)Pa增长法对所测年代的可靠性作了检验。 根据测得数据,萨拉乌苏组的沉积时代不早于晚更新世中期,其上部不超过三万年,下部为距今3—5万年左右。 考虑到人化石及旧石器的出土层位,河套人与萨拉乌苏文化的年代应为距今3.7—5万年左右。     

科学家揭开中国古人类化石新成员——丹尼索瓦人的神秘面纱

我国是世界上发现古人类化石相当丰富的国家之一,迄今已在100余处地点发现了各种古人类化石,年代跨度在距今170万-1万年之间,这些古人类化石包括了直立人、早期智人和晚期智人. 在从20世纪80年代以来逐渐从西方开始流行起来的"走出非洲"这种人类演化故事的标准观点中,200多万年前直立人首先在非洲演化而出.之后大约在60...     

江苏镇江莲花洞动物化石铀系年代

莲花洞位于镇江市南约 6ｋｍ的白龙岗山北坡 (原在丹徒县境内 ) ,地理座标 119°2 4′Ｅ ,32°10′Ｎ。白龙山为宁镇山脉东支 ,走向近东西 ,顶峰海拔 118ｍ。溶洞发育于三迭纪青龙组灰岩 ,洞口标高约 35ｍ。 1981年 ,南京博物院等单位[1 ] 对该地点进行发掘 ,获哺乳动物化石16种 ,其中人牙化石 1枚。洞内堆积自下而上被分为 4层 ,其中第 2层为棕红色亚粘土 ,含石灰岩碎块、铁锰质结核和大量动物化石。发掘者根据动物化石中有 3个绝灭种 ,将该地点定在“晚更新世或晚更新世早期” ,人牙化石被认为属于智人。韩德芬等[2 ] 认为莲花洞在我国晚…     

High-precision U-series dating of Locality 1 at Zhoukoudian, China

Thermal ionization mass spectrometric(230)Th/(234)U dating has been carried out on intercalated speleothem samples from the limestone cave occupied by Homo erectus at Zhoukoudian, China. The samples were recently collected in proper stratigraphic context after detailed field examinations. The results show that the age of the No. 5 Skull from Layer 3 is >400 ka, possibly in the range of about 400-500 ka, and that the hominid fossils from the lower strata are at least 600 ka and possibly >800 ka, much older than previously thought. The near-equilibrium(230)Th/(234)U ratios and internal consistency of the dates and stratigraphy lend credence to the results and allow us to comment on their important implications for human evolution.     

U-Series dating of Liujiang hominid site in Guangxi,Southern China

It has been established that modern humans were living in the Levant and Africa ca. 100ka ago. Hitherto, this has contrasted with the situation in China where no unequivocal specimens of this species have been securely dated to more than 30ka. Here we present the results of stratigraphic studies and U-series dating of the Tongtianyan Cave, the discovery site of the Liujiang hominid, which represents one of the few well-preserved fossils of modern Homo sapiens in China. The human fossils are inferred to come from either a refilling breccia or a primarily deposited gravel-bearing sandy clay layer. In the former case, which is better supported, the fossils would date to at least approximately 68ka, but more likely to approximately 111-139ka. Alternatively, they would be older than approximately 153ka. Both scenarios would make the Liujiang hominid one of the earliest modern humans in East Asia, possibly contemporaneous with the earliest known representatives from the Levant and Africa. Parallel studies on other Chinese localities have provided supporting evidence for the redating of Liujiang, which may have important implications for the origin of modern humans.     

New Late-Pleistocene uranium–thorium and ESR dates for the Singa hominid (Sudan)

The Singa (Sudan) calvaria has been interpreted previously as a terminal Pleistocene modern human fossil, perhaps related to the Bushman of Southern Africa. Here we report new mass-spectrometric U–Th dates for the calcrete deposit enclosing the fossil teeth and the calvaria itself and new electron spin resonance (ESR) dates for associated dental materials. The new data constrain the age of the hominid to at least 133±2 ka. Together with the preferred linear uptake (LU) ESR dates, the U–Th data confirm that the intriguing mixture of modern and archaic characteristics in the Singa specimen date from isotope stage 6. Far from being a modern human fossil, it represents a rare example of an archaic African population which may have been ancestral to all modernHomo sapiens.     

Recent human evolution in East Asia and Australasia.

In both East Asia and Australasia arguments for evolutionary continuity between middle-late Pleistocene hominid populations and modern Homo sapiens are of long standing. In both regions, however, problems of chronological distribution, dating and preservation of hominid skeletal materials provide an effective barrier to extending regional sequences back to 'archaic' Homo sapiens or Homo erectus. The earliest securely dated modern Homo sapiens in East Asia are currently represented by Zhoukoudian Upper Cave at a minimum of 29 ka BP. In Australia skeletal remains of modern Homo sapiens have been dated to 26 ka BP, with archaeological materials at 38 to 50 ka BP. Late Pleistocene human skeletons from sites like Coobool Creek are morphologically and metrically outside the range of recent Australian Aboriginal populations. Similarly Liujiang and the Upper Cave crania can be distinguished from recent East Asian 'Mongoloids'. Evolutionary change within the Holocene needs to be taken into consideration when the evidence for regional evolutionary continuity is considered.     

Position chronologique des sites de l’Homme moderne en Chine d’après la datation U-Th

The origin and evolution of modern Homo sapiens has been the subject of an intensive debate between exponents of two competing hypotheses, multiregional origins and “recent out of Africa”. This paper presents a synthesis of the chronological studies on seven hominid sites in China based on the U-series dating, five of them of intercalated speleothem calcites and other two of fossil materials. The results show that modern humans were present in China about 100 ka ago, much earlier than previously estimated, and that the so-called “temporal gap” of human presence in China between 40 and 100 ka is most probably nothing but an artifact caused by systematic errors of the dating methods. Further multidisciplinary studies on hominid sites in China may provide important evidence for resolving the hotly debated issues concerning the origin of modern humans.     

The Pech-de-l'Azé I Neandertal child: ESR, uranium-series, and AMS 14C dating of its MTA type B context

The Pech-de-l'Azé I skull and mandible are included in the juvenile Neandertal remains from Europe. However, some preserved features in the cranial skeleton seem to distinguish the specimen from other Neandertal children. Unfortunately, the stratigraphic position and dating of this child has never been clear. Our recent work on unpublished archives show that the Pech-de-l'Azé I Neandertal child was discovered at the bottom of layer 6, attributed to the Mousterian of Acheulean tradition type B. These skull and mandible are the first diagnostic human remains (aside from an isolated tooth) attributed to the Mousterian of Acheulian tradition (MTA) type B. Consequently, we confirm that Neandertals were the makers of this Mousterian industry, which is characterized by unusual high frequencies of Upper Paleolithic type tools, elongated blanks and blades. We were able to date the context of the hominid remains by dating layer 6 and the layers above and beneath it using ESR, coupled ESR/(230)Th/(234)U (coupled ESR/U-series), and AMS (14)C. Coupled ESR/U-series results on 16 mammalian teeth constrain the age of the uppermost layer 7 to 41-58ka, and layer 6 to 37-51ka. The wide spread in each age estimate results mainly from uncertainties in the gamma-dose rate. These ages are concordant with AMS (14)C ages of two bones coming from the top of layer 6, which provide dates of about 41.7-43.6ka cal BP. A combination of stratigraphic arguments and dating results for layers 6 and 7 show that the Neandertal child cannot be older than 51ka or younger than 41ka. The lowermost layer 4 is shown to be older than 43ka by the principle of superposition and ESR dating in the immediately overlying layer 5. This study shows that the MTA type B had been manufactured by Neandertals before the arrival of anatomically modern humans in the local region. Additionally, by providing a firm chronological framework for the specific morphometric the features of Pech-de-l'Azé I Neandertal child, this study is a new step toward the understanding of temporal and spatial changes in the ontogenesis of Neandertals in south-western Europe during oxygen isotope stages 5-3.