CONFIDENCE ELLIPSES APPLIED TO THE COMPARISON OF SENSORY PROFILES

Our experiment involved seven panels and six chocolates – five dark chocolates and one milk chocolate. The aim of the study was to compare the sensory profiles of the chocolates. A natural question to ask is “Did the panelists detect any differences among the five dark chocolates or did they systematically contrast them with the milk chocolate?” The scatter plot of the chocolates obtained by principal component analysis was useless to answer that question, because of the proximity of the points. To overcome that, we used confidence ellipses calculated using bootstrap. The originality of the study lies in the fact that we applied those ellipses to hierarchical multiple factor analysis (HMFA): among the seven panels, six were composed of trained professionals and the last one was composed of untrained students, and through that method, we managed to compare the two types of panels and balance the role of each trained panel. HMFA provides in a single scatter plot a representation of the six chocolates for each panel, the trained panels and all the panels. Confidence ellipses around each chocolate show that the combined panels – the six trained panels and also the untrained panel – differentiate the five dark chocolates. They also show how much larger the untrained panel's variability is than that of the trained panels, and how comparable are the trained panels' variability to each other.     

COMPARISONS OF VOLATILE COMPOUNDS RELEASED DURING CONSUMPTION OF A COMPLEX FOOD BY DIFFERENT ASSESSORS WITH EXPRESSIONS OF PERCEIVED FLAVOR DETERMINED BY FREE CHOICE PROFILING

Comparisons of volatile compounds released during consumption by different assessors with individual differences in the assessors'chewing patterns, saliva production rates and ultimately their expressions of perceived flavor have received little research attention to date, although such comparisons are fundamental to the understanding of flavor. To address this, eight untrained assessors were chosen and each consumed six Cheddar cheeses during Buccal Headspace Analysis of the volatile compounds released, while in parallel measures of each assessor's mastication behavior using Electromyography, their stimulated saliva production during consumption and their sensory perceptions of the cheeses flavor during Free Choice Profiling were determined. Relationships between the volatile compounds released and the sensory and physiological measures were investigated using Principal Components Analysis, Generalised Procrustes Analysis and Partial Least Squares regression. It was found that although there were differences between assessors'mastication behavior and saliva production rates, the assessors'individual volatile profiles obtained by Buccal Headspace Analysis were similar for each cheese examined. Also, Partial Least Squares was successful in predicting the most important flavor differences between cheeses from the volatile compounds released during their consumption by different assessors.     

COMPARISON OF SINGLE PRODUCT SCALING AND RELATIVE-TO-REFERENCE SCALING IN SENSORY EVALUATION OF DAIRY PRODUCTS

Single product scaling and relative-to-reference scaling were compared on the basis of numbers of significant differences among chocolate milks and among vanilla yogurts using both trained and untrained panels. The study involved 920 comparisons among product means with appearance, flavor and mouthfeel attributes. Although there were a greater number of significant t-tests when the relative-to-reference scales were used by both trained and untrained panels, the differences between scale types were minor. Panels showed no advantage with the type of scale they used first. The two methods may be used with equal efficiency for sensory evaluations.     

PERCEPTION OF TASTE MIXTURES BY EXPERIENCED AND NOVICE ASSESSORS1

The total intensity, sweetness, and acidity of sucrose/citric acid mixtures were judged by two types of taste panel: experienced assessors, most of whom had had many years of experience in sensory evaluation; and novice assessors, none of whom had previously taken part in a taste experiment. In other respects the experimental conditions remained almost constant. There was good correspondence between the two panels, particularly for judgments of total intensity, indicating that novice and experienced assessors evaluate taste mixtures in the same way. However, there was also an indication that experience on sensory panels may attenuate taste suppression, the suppression of acidity by sweetness being less pronounced for the experienced panel than for the novice panel. The implications for mixture perception are noted.     

THERMAL PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES IN INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS

Sensory analysis was applied to the study of thermal perception, in order to determine and characterize end‐users’ preferences concerning five indoor thermal environments generated by different heating systems. In this review, we developed a sensory profile method to describe and quantify the sensory characteristics of the thermal environments. A consumer test was also performed in order to investigate the hedonic judgment of 119 end users. The results show that trained assessors are able to describe and quantify sensory differences between the environments with high reliability. Consumers’ preferences are influenced by both their thermal sensations in the environments, as expressed by the sensory panel, and their personal opinions of the corresponding heating systems.     

Fluid conservation in athletes: responses to water intake, supine posture, and immersion

The roles of antidiuretic hormone (ADH) and aldosterone in the elicited diuretic responses of trained and untrained men to seated, supine, and head-out water immersed conditions were studied. Volunteers were comprised of groups of six untrained individuals, six trained swimmers, and six trained runners. Each subject underwent three protocols, six hours in a seated position, supine position, or immersion (35 degrees C water). The last two protocols were preceded and followed by 1 h of seated position. After 10 h of fasting, 0.5% body wt of water was drunk. One hour later the trained groups had higher urine osmolalities (P less than 0.05) and urinary excretion rates of ADH (P less than 0.05) and lower urine flow rates (P less than 0.05) than untrained subjects. Throughout the sitting protocol, urinary ADH was also higher in both trained groups (P less than 0.05). Both supine posture and immersion resulted in significant decreases in urinary ADH in the untrained subjects (P less than 0.05) but no changes wer noted in swimmers and only during the second hour of immersion in the runners (P less than 0.05). The natriuresis and kaliuresis were greater during immersion than in the supine position but plasma renin activity, measured only in trained groups, and plasma aldosterone, measured in the untrained group, were decreased similarly with both protocols. The increases in urinary sodium excretion and urine flow rate were lower in trained than untrained subjects during the supine and immersion protocols (P less than 0.05). The data are compatible with an increased osmotic but decreased volume sensitivity of ADH control in trained men.     

USING CUMULATIVE RANKS TO DETECT INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SENSORY PROFILING

This paper is about detection of individual differences among assessors in sensory profiling. A discussion of different types of such differences are given and a graphical tool that can be used for detection of some of them is presented. It is also discussed how this tool, the so called Eggshell plot, can be used in practice and how it is related to the different types of individual differences. The theory is illustrated by two examples from sensory profiling, one from analysis of sausages and one from analysis of cheese.     

DETECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF VARIATION WITHIN AND BETWEEN ASSESSORS IN SENSORY PROFILING

In this paper we discuss methods that can be used to evaluate the performance of sensory panels. In particular we concentrate on detection of variation within and among panelists. A systematic presentation of some simple, graphically oriented tools will be given. Interpretation aspects of the tools will be emphasized. The methods will be illustrated by computations from a sensory experiment based on 4 sausage products. The example demonstrates how the tools can be used to evaluate the reproducibility of the assessors and also how they can be used to detect different types of individual differences among the assessors.     

THE APPLICATION OF TWO FREE-CHOICE PROFILE METHODS TO INVESTIGATE THE SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS OF CHOCOLATE

The concept of free-choice profiling allows untrained assessors to participate in sensory profiling. However, it is sometimes the case that such individuals are unable to describe what they perceive when the samples are presented in the isolation of the sensory testing booths. This paper reports an experiment to compare the usual free-choice profile procedure, with a more structured approach based on Kelly's repertory grid method. Generalized Procrustes analysis was used to analyse the data. The sample configurations obtained from both approaches were very similar, as were the interpretations of the main perceptual dimensions.     

IMPACT OF TRAINING ON BEER FLAVOR PERCEPTION AND DESCRIPTION: ARE TRAINED AND UNTRAINED SUBJECTS REALLY DIFFERENT?

This study examines the effect of beer assessment training on verbal and nonverbal performance. Two groups of subjects are asked to sort, match, and describe a set of 12 beers (6 supplemented and 6 commercial beers). Subjects from the first group are enrolled in a beer-training program. Subjects in the second group are untrained beer consumers. Results show that although both groups perform the matching task equally well, trained subjects performed better on supplemented beers and untrained subjects on commercial beers. Examination of the generated vocabulary shows that 44% of the terms are common to trained and untrained subjects. However, an analysis of the terms' efficiency shows that whereas for trained subjects, precise terms are more efficient than intensity or hedonic terms; the opposite is observed for untrained subjects. This suggests that it is not the term itself that is important but the common reference associated to it.     

COMPARISON OF DISCRIMINATION ABILITY BETWEEN A PANEL OF BLIND ASSESSORS AND A PANEL OF SIGHTED ASSESSORS

The objective of this work was to compare a panel of blind assessors with one of sighted assessors in the discrimination of food products. Each panel had 20 screened and trained assessors. Five commercial food products were used: crackers, liver paste, powdered orange juice mix, Reggiano cheese and yogurt. Slight flavor and/or texture modifications were introduced for adequate discrimination difficulty. Each pair of products was tested by both panels using the triangle test and a scaled difference from control test. Numbers of correct answers for the triangle test were similar for both panels. There were minor differences between the panels in the difference from control test, due to the sighted panel having more training in the use of the scale. Overall the panels of trained blind and sighted assessors were equivalent in their performance.