The influence of sample takers on the cellular composition of cervical smears

In a population-based cervical cancer screening program, the performances of five sample takers and their influence on the cellular composition of the smears and the numbers of epithelial abnormalities diagnosed were analyzed. As measured by the presence of endocervical columnar cells, there were remarkable variations in the quality of the smears between sample takers and between years of sampling. There was also a positive relationship between the presence of endocervical columnar cells in the smear and the number of epithelial abnormalities found. A lower quality of smear was reflected by a lower incidence of epithelial atypical changes found, both between sample takers and by a single sample taker over a period of time. These findings show that sample takers influence the cellular composition of smears and, therefore, the diagnostic outcome of smear screening. Their competence in executing their tasks must be frequently reviewed.     

Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?

The retrieval of columnar endocervical cells from the squamocolumnar junction has generally been considered to be a measure of the adequacy of a Papanicolaou smear; this implies that, if endocervical cells are absent from the smear, the examination for cervical cancer is less than optimal and should be repeated. A study was undertaken to determine if women with serial Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells showed an increased rate of development of cervical atypia in subsequent smears. The smears of 18,914 women were evaluated for the presence or absence of endocervical cells and for the subsequent development of an abnormal smear over a four-year study period. No differences were found in the rates of atypia between women with and those without endocervical cells on serial Papanicolaou smears. Women with prior Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells were much more likely to have a subsequent Papanicolaou smear without endocervical cells. Although no difference was found in the incidence of cervical atypia in the two groups during this short study period, these results should be considered to be preliminary.     

The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes

A study was made of the relationship of endocervical columnar cells to the cytologic identification of abnormality in the cervix. From a population of women participating in a cervical cancer screening program, a group of women was selected whose smears theoretically should have contained endocervical columnar cells. Endocervical cells were present in 93.1% of the smears and absent in 6.9%. A significantly higher number of moderately and severely atypical epithelial changes was found in smears with endocervical cells as compared with smears without endocervical cells.     

Cellular composition of cervical smears in relation to the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception

The influence of the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception on the cellular composition of cervical smears was investigated. The percentage of unsatisfactory smears during the first four days of the cycle was understandably very high, leaving only 80% of the smears of sufficient quality for cytologic diagnosis. The percentage of smears of insufficient quality during the remainder of the cycle was significantly higher in women using oral hormonal contraceptives. The percentages of smears containing endocervical columnar cells, a criterion for judging smears to be of high quality, differed significantly among women using different modes of contraception. The highest percentage of smears without endocervical columnar cells was found in women using oral contraceptives; during the first half of the cycle in these women, smears were of higher quality than during the second half of the cycle. In women not practicing contraception or using nonhormonal methods of contraception, the differences in cellular composition during the cycle, though significant, were too small to be of practical importance. Women using oral contraceptives thus have an increased risk for a potential false-negative diagnosis because of the higher percentage of smears of unreliable quality taken in these women. In women using oral hormonal contraceptives, smears should be taken during the first half of the cycle because of the higher percentage of smears of high quality in that period.     

Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities in cervical smears

In a study of variability in the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities, cervical smears with abnormalities of different severity were rescreened twice by 19 observers with an interval of six months. The observers focused on grading atypicality of squamous, squamous metaplastic and endocervical columnar epithelial cells; their results were compared (1) for the two screenings to assess intraobserver variability and (2) to "review" (final) diagnoses to assess interobserver variability. When the same observer rescreened a smear, 83.3% of the diagnoses did not differ more than one grade between two screenings; however, average intraobserver variability differed considerably for individual observers. The intraobserver variability was only slightly (not significantly) influenced by the years of experience in cytopathology of the observers. Intraobserver variability proved to be an important factor in incorrect diagnoses: 49.1% of the smears with false-negative and 52.9% with false-positive diagnoses at the first rescreening were correctly assessed at the second rescreening. Of all diagnoses made at rescreening, 80.9% were in agreement with the review diagnosis. The interobserver variability also showed considerable differences between observers; however, there was a strong influence of the experience of the observer on the interobserver variability. Atypicality grading of endocervical columnar epithelium by the observers showed a low correlation with the review diagnoses. The relatively low accuracy in the evaluation of this kind of epithelial abnormality is likely to be attributable to the low incidence of abnormal changes of endocervical columnar epithelium. The results of this study point to intraobserver variability as the main cause of false diagnoses. When wrongly diagnosed, severe epithelial abnormalities are more often underestimated than completely overlooked. Apart from training in cytopathology, the establishment of laboratory protocols for multiple screening of even minor abnormalities seem to be the most effective means of reducing the number of false diagnoses.     

The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears

In 30 patients whose last cervical smear had lacked endocervical cells, two new samples were collected, one with a cotton-tipped applicator and the other with the recently developed Cytobrush cervical brush. With the cotton swab, no endocervical cells were present in the repeat smears of 21 patients, as compared with only 3 Cytobrush smears lacking endocervical cells; the difference is statistically significant (P less than .001). Quantitatively, the cellular yield with the Cytobrush was larger. It is concluded that the use of the cervical brush to collect material for cervical smears is more effective and provides a higher yield of cells than the use of the conventional cotton swab. The importance of the presence of endocervical cells in a smear as evidence that the transformation zone has been properly sampled is also discussed.     

Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer

The cytologic histories of 376 women presenting with invasive carcinoma of the cervix were analyzed. In total, 202 (53.7%) of these women had had 355 smears taken during the three years preceding presentation. All 320 smears with an original cytologic diagnosis of less than cancer were reviewed. The original cytologic diagnosis was low in 95 (30.6%) of 310 adequate smears. Originally, 96 (30.9%) of the adequate smears were evaluated as negative; at review, only 55 (17.5%) of the adequate smears were evaluated as negative. Comparing the review diagnoses to the 355 total smears, the rates of negative smears were 13.5% (42 of 310) for squamous-cell carcinoma, 30.0% (12 of 40) for adenocarcinoma and 20.0% (1 of 5) for adenosquamous carcinoma (P less than .05). The cellular composition of the smear was significantly related to the cytologic detection of abnormalities: endocervical cylindrical and/or metaplastic cells were seen in only 45.5% of smears diagnosed as negative, but in 84.4% and 97.8% of smears diagnosed as atypia and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, respectively P less than .00001). Smears without endocervical cells should be considered inadequate and should be repeated.     

Cytohistologic correlation between AGUS and biopsy-detected lesions in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate histologic findings in patients aged 50 and older whose cervical smears revealed atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS). STUDY DESIGN: Computerized records spanning a four-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty patients over age 50 had cervical smears interpreted as AGUS and had follow-up biopsies within 12 months following the abnormal smear. The most important histologic diagnosis from the biopsy specimens was correlated with the subcategory of the cervical smear. RESULTS: Five smears interpreted as AGUS, favor reactive, revealed abnormal histology in four cases: three endometrial polyps and one squamous carcinoma. Two smears interpreted as AGUS, favor dysplasia, revealed squamous intraepithelial lesions on biopsy in both cases. Seventeen smears interpreted as AGUS, favor endometrial cells, revealed abnormal histology in 13 cases: 1 endocervical polyp, 6 endometrial polyps, 3 endometrial hyperplasias and 3 adenomyosis. Six patients with smears interpreted as AGUS, unclassifiable, revealed abnormal histology in five cases: two endocervical polyps, one endometrial polyp, one endometrial carcinoma and one ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The presence of AGUS in cervical smears from women over 50 was highly predictive of abnormal lesions detected by histologic examination. Although three cancers were detected on histologic follow-up, the most common lesions detected were endometrial polyps.     

The endocervical smear as a simple and quick method for the determination of ovulation

The endocervix undergoes cyclic changes in every menstrual cycle, as reflected by the rheologic properties of the cervical mucus. A study was therefore undertaken to establish whether there were any morphologic changes in the endocervical columnar cells, as seen in the endocervical smears, that could be correlated with ovulation and anovulation. An endocervical smear was collected in the luteal phase of the cycle from patients in whom an endometrial biopsy or D & C was being done as a part of an infertility investigation. A significant correlation was observed between the endocervical smear interpretation and the endometrial histology as to whether the cycle was ovulatory or anovulatory.     

Detailed account of confounding factors in interpretation of FTIR spectra of exfoliated cervical cells

The confounding variables that can potentially lead to a misinterpretation of FTIR spectroscopy of exfoliated cervical cells is described. A detailed account of the spectral effects of the following variables in FTIR spectroscopic screening of exfoliated cervical cells is presented: polymorphs; Cell degradation; and impurities such as endocervical columnar cells, metaplastic cells, cervical mucus, red cells, and debris. The interpretation of the spectra of exfoliated cervical cells must be done with subtraction analysis, which includes these factors. This is essential to prevent unacceptable false-positive rates. The above techniques are subsequently applied to two clinic populations: a dysplasia clinic in follow-up patients with negative cytology and two general gynecology clinics with patients with negative cytology. In the dysplasia clinic group 250 sequential patients with negative smears were tested. Thirty had false-positive smears as defined by the IR spectroscopy using the above methodology. Twenty of those patients subsequently had one follow-up and six had a positive abnormal smear. In the community clinic group 656 sequential patients were examined who had negative smears, of which 27 had false-positive FTIR spectra.     

An Audit of Cervical Cancer Deaths In Nottingham

Death certificates were reviewed and 57 women were identified whose primary cause of death was cervical cancer. Their cervical smear records were reviewed from laboratory files. Only nine had participated in the cervical cancer screening programme before the diagnosis of cervical cancer was made. One woman had an abnormal smear as a result of cervical screening but failed to attend for follow-up.
The problem of false negative smears is also addressed and the value of review of negative smears for the purposes of cytology audit is emphasized.     

Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the quality assessment of cervical smears

Intraobserver and interobserver variability in assessing the quality of cervical smears, as measured by the presence or absence of endocervical columnar cells and squamous metaplastic cells, was evaluated. In total, 180 cervical smears representing the most important cytologic diagnoses were anonymously rescreened twice by 19 observers with an interval of six months. An absence of endocervical columnar cells was proven to correlate with a high percentage of false-negative diagnoses. Intraobserver agreement on the presence or absence of endocervical columnar cells was 85.7% between the two screenings. A predictive value of 57.7% was found for a negative scoring (absence of these cells) while the predictive value of a positive scoring (presence of endocervical cells) was 87.3%. Of the observer scorings, 83.9% concurred with the final diagnosis; there was no significant correlation between that concurrence and the number of years of experience in cytopathology of the observer. For squamous and squamous metaplastic cells in the cervical smear the predictive value of a negative scoring (absence) was only 20.6%. Compared to the final diagnosis, 69.5% of these scorings matched. A significant and relatively high correlation with the experience of the observer was found for the scoring for the presence of metaplastic cells. Even though the predictive values of these quality scorings were relatively low a significantly higher risk for false diagnoses was established when negative scorings were given. It is therefore advisable to have smears with negative scorings for endocervical columnar cells and squamous metaplastic cells always rescreened by another observer.     

Cervex brush versus vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling

Cervex brush versus vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling
Cervex brush sampling was compared with the conventional triple vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) smear technique. Nine hundred and fifty‐nine Cervex brush smears and 1064 VCE smears were studied. All smears with both methods were technically satisfactory for evaluation. Endocervical cells were found in 90.7% and metaplastic cells in 73.3% of Cervex brush samples and in 92.5% and 64.1% of VCE samples, respectively. There were significantly more metaplastic cells in smears from premenopausal women. Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) was found in three Cervex brush samples and in two VCE samples. High‐grade SIL was found only in one Cervex brush sample. Benign cellular changes were found in 142 Cervex brush samples and in 144 VCE samples. Sampling with the Cervex brush is efficient, simple and fast and gives high quality cervical smears for cytological evaluation.     

Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears

The quality of the cervical smear, a decisive factor in the efficacy of population screening, can depend on the sampling method utilized. An analysis was made of the performance of five sample takers in a screening program, each of whom had made approximately 5,000 smears, and of the five sampling methods each had used: spatula alone (method A), Cytobrush plus spatula (method B), Cytopick (method C), cotton swab plus spatula (method D) and Cervex brush (method E). The differences between the sample takers and the sampling methods were significant in both the detection of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN III) (P less than .01) and in the production of smears containing endocervical cells (EC+) (P less than .018). The data obtained firmly establish the importance of the presence of endocervical cells for smear adequacy. The results of this study indicate that (1) method B (Cytobrush plus spatula) and method C (Cytopick) give superior results in the preparation of EC+ smears and in the detection of CIN III and thus should be used in population screening programs, and (2) methods A and D should not be used for cervical cytologic sampling in such programs.     

Estimating the sensitivity of cervical cytology: errors of interpretation and test limitations

The objective of this study was to estimate: (i) the sensitivity of cytologists in recognizing abnormal smears; (ii) the sensitivity of cervical cytology as a method of detecting abnormal smears among those obtained in the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Study subjects were 61 women with a histologically confirmed CIN identified through colpohistological and cytologic screening. For objective (i) new smears were taken from study subjects just before treatment, mixed with routine preparations, interpreted by unaware cytologists and then blindly reviewed by a group of three expert supervisors, who reached a consensus diagnosis. Cytologists classified as positive for squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) 30 of the 34 smears judged as positive by supervisors (100% of smears classified as high-grade and 67% of smears classified as low-grade SIL by the supervisors). Our approach, based on creating a set of smears with a high a priori probability of being positive, proved to be an efficient way of estimating errors of interpretation. For objective (ii), smears taken at the moment of diagnosis, just before biopsy, were also reviewed by the same supervisors. These CIN cases were identified among asymptomatic women independently of cytological findings and results are therefore not subject to verification bias. Among the 33 histological CINII/III, four (12%) smears had no atypical cells (three negatives and one unsatisfactory) at review. The same proportion was 26% (four negatives and one unsatisfactory) among the 19 histological CINI. No significant differences in smear content were found between the seven ‘false negatives’ and a sample of ‘true positives’ and ‘true negatives’ for a number of formal adequacy criteria (including presence of endocervical cells). Strong differences were found between positive smears taken just before biopsy and those taken just before treatment (in 11 women the first smear only was positive, while the opposite was never observed), suggesting an effect of punch biopsy in removing lesions.     

Goblet-like cells in atrophic vaginal smears and their histologic correlation. Possible confusion with endocervical cells.

The occurrence and origin of goblet-like cells seen between clusters of parabasal cells in atrophic vaginal smears were investigated. The goblet-like cells were cytologically identified in the vaginal smears from 23 (19.2%) of 120 patients whose smears showed an atrophic pattern, but without any inflammatory, dysplastic or malignant changes. Histologically, these cells were found in sections from 6 (18.8%) of 32 elderly women with atrophic vaginal epithelium. The goblet-like cells were situated among the squamous cells of the upper layer of the atrophic squamous epithelium from the vagina to the portio. These goblet-like cells in atrophic smears were initially misinterpreted as endocervical cells, which are regarded as a marker of smear adequacy in the cytologic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. The correct interpretation of these goblet-like cells in smears from postmenopausal and elderly women is thus obviously important in assessing the adequacy of the sample for the detection of abnormal cells.     

Cellular Differences Between True Negative and False Negative Papanicolaou Smears

A matched case-control study of 123 false negative Papanicolaou smears and 488 true negative Papanicolaou smears was undertaken to determine the association between the types of cells present on the smear and the correctness of the cytology report. the false negative slides were significantly more likely to include endocervical columnar cells than the true negative slides (odds ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–3.01). No statistically significant difference in metaplastic cell status was evident (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 0.95–2.30). When considered together, metaplastic and/or columnar cells were significantly more likely to be present in false negative smears than in true negative smears (odds ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.13–3.08). the implications of these findings for improving the accuracy of cervical cytology for the detection of precancerous lesions are discussed.     

Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy

The presence of endocervical cells in routine gynecologic smears (prepared from spatula and cotton swab samples) and Cytobrush smears was analyzed in 52 patients with a history of prior cryotherapy. These cases represented 11% of the 491 women evaluated using both techniques between August 1, 1987, and January 31, 1990. The routine smear contained endocervical cells in 25 (48%) of the 52 cases while the Cytobrush smear contained endocervical cells in 49 (94%) of the cases. The use of the Cytobrush for cervical cytologic screening thus appears to be of value in patients with a prior history of cryotherapy, which frequently renders the transformation zone less accessible to routine sampling.     

Influence of endocervical status on the cytologic prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

A case-control analysis of the endocervical status of smears that preceded a histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) showed that smears which correctly predicted CIN were significantly more likely to include metaplastic cells than were smears reported to be negative. There was no significant difference between the smears with respect to the presence of columnar cells. A high level of agreement was apparent between scientists in determining both columnar and metaplastic cell status. A discussion of the definition, role and potential impact of endocervical status in the prevention of cervical cancer is presented.     

Cytological Changes Associated With Tubo-Endometrioid Metaplasia of the Uterine Cervix

Two women who had undergone previous cervical surgery for the treatment of glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), were found to have severely dyskaryotic cells of glandular and metaplastic type in follow-up cervical smears. A third patient was found to have similar abnormal cells in a routine screening smear. All of the patients were subjected to either hysterectomy or cervical conization and in all cases histological examination showed tubo-endometrioid glands in the endocervix, well away from the uterine isthmus, with no associated endometrial stromal tissue. All of the cervical smears were reviewed and cytological features that facilitate the distinction between tubo-endometrioid metaplasia and squamous or glandular dyskaryosis were identified. These features include the smaller size of affected cells, more marked nuclear hyperchromasia, inconspicuous nucleoli, the formation of glandular structures, the lack of discrete squamous dyskaryosis and the absence of the typical 'feathering' noted with GIN. the possibility of tubo-endometrioid metaplasia should be considered when atypical glandular or metaplastic cells are noted in cervical smears, particularly, but not exclusively, in women who have been treated for CIN or GIN. In the presence of these changes clinicians should rebiopsy the cervix before embarking on further unnecessary surgery which may adversely affect fertility and pregnancy, particularly in younger patients.