Effect of dexamethasone on secretion of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in the boar

Eight adult, Yorkshire-Landrace crossbred boars were used to evaluate the effects of the synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone (DXM) on the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone. Four treatments of 4 d each were administered: 1) 2 ml i.m. of 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution (control); 2) DXM (2 ml i.m. as a dose of 50 mug/kg body weight, every 12 h); 3) DXM plus gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; 50 mug in 1 ml i.m. every 6 h); 4) 2 ml NaCl solution i.m. plus a single dose of 50 mug i.v. GnRH. Blood samples were collected twice daily from an indwelling jugular vein catheter for 3 d and at 15 min intervals for 12 h on the fourth day. DXM treatment resulted in lower (P M0.01) testosterone values in samples collected twice daily. More frequent sampling on Day 4 revealed that DXM reduced (P<0.01) the number of pulsatile increases of LH in plasma, although the individual mean pulse areas did not fiffer between the NaCl- and DXM-treated groups. This was associated with a decreased pulse frequency of testosterone (P<0.05). GnRH plus DXM treatment caused a significant elevation (P<0.05) in mean values as well as in the mean pulse area and in the total of the individual pulse areas of LH. Pulse area and mean concentrations of testosterone were also increased (P<0.01) when GnRH was given concurrently with DXM. Comparison of a single injection of GnRH when NaCl was being administered (Treatment 4) to one of the injections of GnRH (Day 4, 0800 h, Treatment 3) revealed a subsequently greater (P<0.01) pulse area in LH above base-line during DXM treatment (7.67 +/- 1.17 ng/ml) than during the NaCl (4.17 +/- 0.73 ng/ml) treatment period. This was reflected in a greater (P<0.01) pulse increase of testosterone following the LH pulse in boars treated with DXM. It is concluded that DXM treatment in the boar can reduce the pulse frequency of LH secretion, presumably by affecting GnRH secretion, but it has less effect directly on pituitary LH synthesis and release.     

Phenotypic variation in testosterone and luteinizing hormone production among boars: differential response to gonadotropin releasing hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone

Variation in ability of boars to produce testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) in response to both gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation, as well as quantitative relationships between pretreatment and posttreatment responses, were assessed in a population of 38 boars of similar age and breeding. Peripheral testosterone concentrations following either GnRH or ACTH increased (P less than 0.01) to peak circulating levels of 7.16 +/- 0.62 and 8.42 +/- 0.81 ng/ml by 120 and 45 min, respectively. Post-GnRH testosterone area varied from 7.44 to 50.84 ng/ml X h (CV = 47.44%) and post-ACTH testosterone area ranged from 3.05 to 28.78 ng/ml X h (CV = 46.09%). GnRH-induced increases in testosterone were preceded by elevations (P less than 0.01) in peripheral LH concentrations but ACTH had no effect upon LH levels. Post-GnRH area varied from 7.07 to 125.45 ng/ml X h (CV = 76.61%). Significant (P less than 0.01) correlations were obtained between pre-GnRH and post-GnRH testosterone areas (r = 0.58) and between pre-ACTH and post-ACTH testosterone areas (r = 0.67). Nonsignificant (P greater than 0.10) correlations were obtained between post-GnRH and post-ACTH testosterone areas (r = 0.006) and between post-GnRH testosterone and LH areas (r = 0.09). The testosterone producing ability of boars was highly variable and their innate ability to produce testosterone influenced their response to GnRH and ACTH. Additionally, the mechanisms by which GnRH and ACTH influence testosterone production in boars appear to differ. Variation in the ability of boars to produce testosterone could not be explained on the basis of differences in circulating levels of LH.     

Testosterone inhibits gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in the male sheep

The objective was to determine the effect of chronic testosterone (T) treatment on GnRH and LH secretion in wethers. Rams were either castrated only or castrated and immediately treated with Silastic implants containing T. Several weeks later, a device for collecting hypophyseal-portal blood was surgically implanted. Six to seven days later, blood samples were collected simultaneously and continuously from the portal vessels and jugular vein of pairs of conscious animals. Samples were divided at 10-min intervals for 6-12 h. One hour before the end of collection, all animals received i.v. injections of 250 ng of GnRH. In samples collected simultaneously from 6 pairs of animals, T reduced the frequency of both GnRH pulses (1.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.3/h, p less than 0.03) and LH pulses (1.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.3/h, p less than 0.03). T did not alter amplitude of either GnRH or LH pulses. Testosterone reduced mean GnRH (9.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.5 pg/ml, p less than 0.05), whereas mean LH was not significantly reduced (9.6 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.8 ng/ml, p = 0.16). These results support the hypothesis that T reduces GnRH pulse frequency.     

Variation in testosterone production among boards and its relationship to sexual interest and breeding performance

Variation in ability to produce testosterone in response to both GnRH and ACTH administration and quatitative relationships between GnRH-stimulated testosterone levels, ACTH-stimulated testosterone levels, sexual interest and breeding performance were assessed in a group of 31 Duroc boars (115.4 +/- 2.5 kg body weight and 212.2 +/- 3.0 days of age). Mean area beneath the testosterone response curve increased (P<0.01) after GnRH and ACTH but the magnitude of response was variable among boars. Post-GnRH testosterone area varied from 7.44 to 50.86 ng/ml X h with a CV = 52.41% while post-ACTH testosterone area varied from 4.99 to 28.78 ng/ml X h with a CV = 45.46%. Mean sexual interest and mean breeding performance scores were correlated (r = 0.67, P<0.01); however, correlations of either variable with testosterone areas were low and nonsignificant. These results indicate that the testosterone-producing ability of boars of similar age and breeding is highly variable and suggest that peripheral testosterone concentrations may not be good indicators of either libido or breeding performance.     

Decreased pulsatile LH secretion in heifers superovulated with eCG or FSH

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that treatment with super-ovulatory drugs suppresses endogenous pulsatile LH secretion. Heifers (n=5/group) were superovulated with eCG (2500 IU) or FSH (equivalent to 400 mg NIH-FSH-P1), starting on Day 10 of the estrous cycle, and were injected with prostaglandin F(2alpha) on Day 12 to induce luteolysis. Control cows were injected only with prostaglandin. Frequent blood samples were taken during luteolysis (6 to 14 h after PG administration) for assay of plasma LH, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone and androstenedione. The LH pulse frequency in eCG-treated cows was significantly lower than that in control cows (2.4 +/- 0.4 & 6.4 +/- 0.4 pulses/8 h, respectively; P<0.05), and plasma progesterone (3.4 +/- 0.4 vs 1.8 +/- 0.1 ng/ml, for treated and control heifers, respectively; P<0.05) and estradiol concentrations (25.9 +/- 4.3 & 4.3 +/- 0.4 pg/ml, for treated and control heifers, respectively; P<0.05) were higher compared with those of the controls. No LH pulses were detected in FSH-treated cows, and mean LH concentrations were significantly lower than those in the controls (0.3 +/- 0.1 & 0.8 +/- 0.1, respectively; P<0.05). This suppression of LH was associated with an increase in estradiol (9.5 +/- 1.4 pg/ml; P<0.05 compared with controls) but not in progesterone concentrations (2.1 +/- 0.2 ng/ml; P>0.05 compared to controls). Both superovulatory protocols increased the ovulation rate (21.6 +/- 3.9 and 23.0 +/- 4.2, for eCG and FSH groups, respectively; P>0.05). These data demonstrate that super-ovulatory treatments decrease LH pulse frequency during the follicular phase of the treatment cycle. This could be explained by increased steroid secretion in the eCG-trated heifers but not in FSH-treated animals.     

The effect of progestin and GnRH treatments on ovarian function and reproductive hormone secretions of anestrous postpartum suckled beef cows

Eighteen anestrous crossbred suckled beef cows were assigned to one of three treatment groups. Treatments were as follows: Group 1 cows (n = 3) were untreated and served as controls, Groups 2 cows (n = 6) were intramuscularly administered 250 mug GnRH, and Group 3 cows (n = 9) were subcutaneously administered a progestin ear implant for eight days prior to the administration of 250 mug GnRH. The GnRH was given to cows in Group 3 24 h after the time of progestin implant removal. Cows were 21 to 31 days postpartum at the time of GnRH treatment. The percent of cows that ovulated after the time of GnRH treatment was 0%, 83% and 100% for Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For the cows that ovulated, more (P < 0.05) cows in Group 2 (80%) had abnormal luteal phases than in Group 3 (33%). The GnRH-induced LH release and peak LH concentrations were greater (P < 0.01) in the cows in Group 3 (214.3 +/- 37.1 ng/ml) than in the cows in Group 2 (142.7 +/- 19.0 ng/ml). The LH concentrations of the control cows remained very low throughout the sampling period. Although prostaglandin metabolite (PGFM) concentrations were not significantly (P > 0.10) different among groups, mean concentrations were higher and more variable for cows in Groups 1 (39.2 +/- 5.2 pg/ml) and 2 (39.4 + 6.1 pg/ml) than for cows in Group 3 (25.1 + 1.4 pg/ml).     

Metabolism of GnRH in man: influence of estrogens

To clarify the influence of estrogens on the metabolism of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), we studied the metabolic clearance rate (MCR) of GnRH (MCRGnRH), and the serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol and testosterone (total and free fraction) in 9 sexually mature men and 7 women under basal conditions and after treatment with the antiestrogen tamoxifen (2 X 10 mg/day p.o.) for 7 days. In women, the medication was started on day 7 +/- 1 of their menstrual cycles. To calculate the MCR, synthetic GnRH was continuously infused (1.53 micrograms/min) and its serum levels were measured by a radioimmunoassay. During tamoxifen treatment we observed a small but significant decrease in the MCR in men (455 +/- 48 to 357 +/- 46 ml/min/1.86 m2), whereas the known cyclic increase in the MCR in women was blunted (1,769 +/- 147 to 1,558 +/- 119 ml/min/1.86 m2). There was a small but significant increase in LH levels in women (8.3 +/- 2.1 to 11.5 +/- 2.5 mU/ml). LH and testosterone levels in men, and FSH and estradiol levels in both sexes did not change significantly. Conclusion: (1) estrogens regulate the MCRGnRH either directly or by changing gonadotropin levels, but the effect is only slight; (2) an enhanced metabolism of GnRH may contribute to the feedback of estrogens on the secretion of gonadotropins, and (3) the sex-specific difference of the MCR is presumably not caused by estrogens.     

Comparable testosterone responses are produced by constant infusion of LH or GnRH in normal men

Luteinizing hormone (LH) was infused continuously at a rate of 1.3 IU/min to 4 normal adult men. A 4 to 5-fold increase in serum LH was noted by 8 hours. Serum FSH declined steadily throughout the infusion period in the face of rising concentrations of gonadal steroids. Basal plasma testosterone of 4.7 +/- 0.4 ng/ml rose progressively to a peak of 11.1 +/- 0.9 ng/ml at hour 56 (p less than 0.005). A similar pattern was demonstrated by plasma androstenedione. Plasma 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone rose from a basal concentration of 0.81 +/- 0.14 ng/ml to a peak concentration of 2.6 +/- 0.3 ng/ml at hour 36 of the infusion and subsequently declined. A similar course was followed by serum estradiol-17 beta, which achieved a maximal concentration of 70.0 +/- 10.4 pg/ml at hour 36. Results are compared to those obtained with continuous infusion of GnRH in normal adult men. Testosterone responses were similar, whereas elevations in 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone and estradiol were higher following GnRH infusion. This difference may be consequent upon a direct gonadal effect of GnRH, or may be secondary to local regulation of testicular steroidogenesis by estradiol-17 beta.     

Effect of nutrition on the LH response to calf removal and GnRH

Ten primiparous crossbred cows were assigned to two dietary groups at calving. One group received 120% and the other group received 80% of the National Research Council (NRC) recommended allowance of dietary energy for primiparous cows. At 60 days postpartum, calves were removed from their dams. Blood samples were collected from the cows at 15-min intervals for 8 hr beginning at the time of calf removal and again 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr after calf removal. At 72 hr after calf removal, all cows were given 200 ug GnRH intravenously. At calf removal, serum LH concentrations were higher (P<0.01) for cows on 120% (0.9 +/- 0.03 ng/ml) compared to cows on 80% (0.5 +/- 0.03 ng/ml) of recommendations. Serum LH concentrations increased (1.6 +/- 0.1 ng/ml, P<0.01) by 24 hr in cows on the highenergy diet. In contrast, a similar increase was not observed in cows on the low-energy diet until 48 hr after calf removal (1.4 +/- 0.2 ng/ml, P<0.01). These contrasting patterns in serum LH concentrations resulted in a diet by time interaction (P<0.01). Serum LH concentrations increased in both dietary energy groups following GnRH injection, but the response was greater (P<0.01) in cows on the low-energy diet compared to the cows fed the high-energy diet. These results indicate that inadequate dietary energy delays the LH response to calf removal and increases the LH response to exogenous GnRH.     

Effect of castration on plasma luteinizing hormone in postpubertal boars

Two experiments were conducted to test the working hypothesis that mean plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) increase as a result of an increase in the frequency and amplitude of the pulsatile releases of LH in postpubertal boars after removal of gonadal steroid hormones by castration. It was further hypothesized that these changes in secretion of LH would be the result of changes in sensitivity of the pituitary to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). In Experiment 1, plasma LH was monitored in 10 postpubertal crossbred boars (13 to 14 mo old and weighing 159 +/- 6.0 kg) at 12-min intervals for 6 h before and 1 h after GnRH (375 ng/kg of body weight) on Days -1, 7, 14, 21 and 29 relative to castration. In Experiment 2, plasma LH was monitored in four castrated and five intact postpubertal boars (11 to 12 mo old and weighing 150 +/- 5.1 kg) after each of three doses of GnRH (94, 188 and 375 ng/kg) were administered to each animal. Sample collection occurred 5 wk after castration. Mean LH and frequency of pulsatile releases of LH increased as a result of castration (P<0.0001), with changes evident by Day 7 after castration. However, the amplitude of the LH pulses increased minimally after castration (P<0.10). The response to exogenous GnRH increased throughout Experiment 1 (P<0.0001), even though the amplitude of the pulsatile releases of LH (response to endogenous GnRH) did not change. Castrated animals in Experiment 2 had a greater response of LH to GnRH stimulation than intact boars (P<0.05). The dose-response curve of castrated animals was not parallel (P<0.001) to that of intact boars, and indicated that sensitivity of the pituitary to GnRH had increased in the absence of gonadal steroids. Thus, the hypotheses stated above can be accepted with the exception that castration may have a minimal effect on LH pulse amplitude. Based on the results of these experiments, we suggest that gonadal steroid hormones modulate both the size of releasable stores of LH and pituitary sensitivity to GnRH in boars.     

Pituitary and gonadal function in hypogonadotrophic hypogonadal (hpg) mice bearing hypothalamic implants

GnRH receptor values are 30-50% of normal in pituitaries of hpg male mice, and testicular LH receptors only 8% of normal (160.4 +/- 17.6 and 2013 +/- 208.1 fmol/testis respectively). In male hpg mice bearing fetal preoptic area (POA) hypothalamic implants for 10 days there was no change in pituitary GnRH receptors, pituitary gonadotrophin content, or seminal vesicle weight. However, testicular weights and LH receptors were doubled in 4/10 mice and 2 had increased serum FSH levels. Between 26 and 40 days after implantation pituitary GnRH receptors and pituitary LH increased to normal male levels, although at 40 days serum and pituitary FSH concentrations had reached only 50% of normal values. Testicular and seminal vesicle weights increased more than 10-fold by 40 days after implantation and LH receptors to 70% of normal. In hpg female mice bearing hypothalamic implants for 30-256 days pituitary gonadotrophin concentrations were normal, even though GnRH receptors reached only 60% of normal values (6.18 +/- 0.4 and 9.8 +/- 0.4 fmol/pituitary respectively). Serum FSH was substantially increased from values of less than 30 ng/ml in hpg mice to within the normal female range in hypothalamic implant recipients. Ovarian and uterine weights increased after hypothalamic grafting from only 4-5% to over 74% of normal values. LH receptors increased from 6.5 +/- 1.3 fmol/ovary for hpg mice to 566.9 +/- 39.2 fmol/ovary for implant recipients. Vaginal opening occurred about 23 days after implantation and these animals displayed prolonged periods of oestrus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The influence of estradiol-17beta and progesterone on peripheral serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in the ovariectomized ewe

Serum gonadotropin concentrations were high and variable and fluctuated episodically in short and long term ovariectomized ewes. Treatment with solid silastic implants releasing progesterone (serum levels 1.81 +/- 0.16 ng/ml) had no consistent effect. Treatment with implants releasing estradiol-17beta significantly depressed mean serum gonadotropin concentrations and peak height to values usually seen in intact ewes. This occurred regardless of implant size and serum estradiol-17beta concentrations (range 11 +/- 0.3 pg/ml to 98 +/- 12.8 pg/ml). Progesterone and estradiol-17beta together significantly depressed the frequency of peaks in LH concentration. Following progesterone removal, 95% of the ewes treated with progesterone and estradiol-17beta implants experienced a transient increase in serum LH concentrations similar to the preovulatory surge in intact ewes. Eighty-four percent of the LH surges were accompanied by a surge in serum FSH concentrations. However, following progesterone removal, 5.1 +/- 2.1 FSH surges were observed over six days. Gonadotropin surges occurred regardless of estradiol-17beta implant size and with or without the influence of supplemental estradiol-17beta.     

Luteinizing hormone release in intact and castrate rams is altered with immunoneutralization of endogenous estradiol

Changes in the dynamics of luteinizing hormone (LH) release in the adult ram following immunoneutralization of endogenous estradiol were investigated. Castrate rams were actively immunized against estradiol-6-bovine serum albumin for 7 months and then their patterns of episodic LH release and LH response to multiple injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH, two 5-micrograms doses given iv 2 h apart) were assessed (April). In comparison with control rams immunized against rabbit gamma globulin, estradiol-immunized rams (antibody titre approximately 1:5000) exhibited more frequent LH releases (11.7 +/- 0.3 vs. 9.3 +/- 0.8 pulses/8 h, P less than 0.05) and a greater LH response to the first GnRH injection (peak delta value 190 +/- 8 vs. 130 +/- 25 ng/mL, P less than 0.01). Estradiol antiserum collected from the castrate rams was used in the passive immunization of intact rams (antibody titre approximately 1:200) for 1 month (beginning mid-July). Although episodic LH release was always similar for control and immunized rams, testosterone levels in the latter group increased approximately 150%. In contrast with the castrate ram response, GnRH treatment (two 5-micrograms doses given iv 80 min apart) produced a "self-priming" effect on LH release in the intact rams, an effect that was dampened with estradiol immunoneutralization. Consequently, peak 2:peak 1 ratios for delta value and 80-min mean incremental increase were much smaller (P less than 0.01) for the immunized rams (approximately 2:1 vs. 4:1 for the control rams).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relation between nocturnal melatonin profile and hormonal markers of puberty in humans.

We examined the relation between nocturnal melatonin and hormonal markers of puberty in 57 normal children and adolescents and 39 subjects with disorders of pubertal onset. Melatonin was measured in hourly blood samples drawn overnight by constant withdrawal. Basal 08.00 h plasma testosterone, estradiol and LH, and the peak LH response to LHRH administration were determined. There were no significant correlations between testosterone, estradiol, basal LH and peak LH and melatonin peak (r = -0.18, -0.22, -0.02, -0.12, respectively) or melatonin peak time (r = 0.12, -0.01, -0.02, 0.07 respectively). The results were not affected significantly by sex, diagnosis or age. A comparison of subjects grouped by peak LH < 15 U/l (most likely prepubertal; n = 40) and peak LH > 30 U/l (most likely pubertal; n = 34) showed no significant differences in melatonin peak (160.5 +/- 59.3 vs. 146.6 +/- 50.9 pg/ml; t = 1.09; p > 0.05) or melatonin peak time (1.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 2.5 +/- 1.7 h; t = -1.79; p > 0.05). Although a pineal-puberty relation cannot be excluded, the results do not support the hypothesis that melatonin restrains the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis during childhood.     

Suppression of follicle wave emergence in cyclic ewes by supraphysiologic concentrations of estradiol-17beta and induction with a physiologic dose of exogenous ovine follicle-stimulating hormone

Follicle waves are preceded by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) peaks in ewes. The purpose of the present study was to see whether estradiol implant treatment would block FSH peaks to create a model in which the effect of the timing and mode of FSH peaks could be studied by ovine FSH (oFSH) injection. In Experiment 1, 10 ewes received estradiol-17beta implants on Day 4 after ovulation (Day 0, day of ovulation); five ewes received large implants, and five ewes received small implants. Five control ewes received empty implants. In Experiment 2, 12 ewes received large implants on Day 4. On Day 9, six ewes received oFSH twice, 8 h apart (0.5 microg/kg; s.c.). Implants were left in place for 10 days in both experiments. In both studies, ovarian ultrasonography and blood sampling was done daily. In Experiment 1, estradiol concentrations were significantly higher in ewes with large implants (10.4 +/- 0.7 pg/ml) compared with controls (3.9 +/- 0.7 pg/ml) and ewes with small implants (5.4 +/- 0.7 pg/ml; P < 0.001). A significant reduction was found in mean FSH peak concentration (31%; P < 0.05) and FSH peak amplitude (45%; P < 0.05) in ewes with large implants compared with controls. Mean and basal FSH concentrations were unaffected by the large implants. The large implants halted follicle-wave emergence between Day 0 and 8 after implant insertion. The small follicle pool (2-3 mm in diameter) was unaffected by the large implants. When oFSH was injected into ewes with large implants, a follicle wave emerged 1.5 +/- 0.5 days after injection; however, in ewes given saline alone, a follicle wave emerged 4.8 +/- 0.8 days after injection (P < 0.01). We concluded that truncation of FSH peaks by estradiol implants prevented follicle-wave emergence, but injection of physiologic concentrations of oFSH reinitiated follicle-wave emergence.     

Effects of season and phase of the estrous cycle on steroidogenesis and LH-FSH sensitivity of large ovine follicles perfused in vitro

The aims of this study were to compare stero?dogenesis (progesterone, androstenedione and estradiol production) and response to LH and FSH challenge by whole perifused follicles 4 to 5.5 mm in diameter, obtained at different periods of the breeding season (onset, middle, end), during anestrus and the luteal phase. We have observed that all follicles do not have the same stero?dogenetic potential and do not respond with the same intensity to LH and FSH. At the middle of the breeding season, LH and FSH supplementation was ineffective in increasing progesterone secretion by follicles (0.19+/-0.05 vs. 0.20+/-0.03 ng/mL). In contrast, gonadotrophin challenge elicited significant (P<0.05) increases in androstenedione (0.94+/-0.34 vs. 0.35+/-0.09 ng/mL) and estradiol (120+/-11 vs. 49+/-10 pg/mL) production immediately after its administration. At the onset of the breeding season, steroidogenesis was identical under both basal and gonadotrophin-stimulated conditions unlike that in middle of the breeding season. However follicles were more sensitive to the gonadotrophin challenge in terms of estradiol production than those collected at the middle of the breeding season (220+/-45 vs. 120+/-11 pg/mL). Follicles obtained at the end of the breeding season featured higher progesterone (2.61+/-0.81 vs. 0.19+/-0.05 ng/mL; P<0.05) and lower estradiol production (10+/-3 vs. 49+/-10 pg/mL; P<0.05) that was not influenced by LH and FSH. Basal androstenedione secretion was comparable to that observed at the middle of the breeding season (0.42+/-0.10 vs. 0.35+/-0.09 ng/mL), but the response to stimulation was significantly higher (1.82+/-0.61 vs. 0.94+/-0.34 ng/mL; P<0.05). In anoestrus and the luteal phase, follicles presented higher progesterone and androstenedione and lower estradiol concentrations (P<0.05) compared with those obtained during the follicular phase at the middle of the breeding season. In the luteal phase, follicles remained capable of responding to LH-FSH challenge by increasing estradiol secretion (9+/-1 before and 21+/-6 pg/mL after LH-FSH; P<0.05). In contrast, in the luteal phase, estradiol production was not increased by LH-FSH challenge (7+/-2 vs. 12+/-4 pg/mL).     

The negative feedback effect of estradiol-17beta on secretion of luteinizing hormone in beef cows

Thirty-two ovariectomized cows were used to determine the time course for the negative feedback effect of estradiol-17beta (E) on secretion of the luteinizing hormone (LH). The cows were injected with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; 40 mug) 2.5 or 5 h after pretreatment with E (1 mug/kg body weight) or with a vehicle for control (C). Pretreatment with E resulted in lower serum concentrations of LH at 2.5 h (0.27 vs 0.90 ng/ml; P < 0.01) and at 5 h (0.27 vs 0.67 ng/ml; P < 0.01); less LH was released in response to GnRH at 2.5 h after treatment compared to cows treated with C (10 +/- 4.9 vs 27 +/- 3.8 ng/ml; P < 0.001). However, when GnRH was administered 5 h after E or C, there was no difference in the total amount of LH released (34 +/- 1.8 vs 26 +/- 4.4 ng/ml; P > 0.2). Time to half area (estimate of decay for the induced surge of LH) was longer for cows treated with E when compared to those treated with C (1.3 vs 0.9 h, P < 0.001; 1.5 vs 0.8 h, P < 0.001). Time to half area was not affected by the time of administration of GnRH after E (P > 0.4). These results suggest that E acts in the pituitary to cause the initial decrease in concentrations of LH. Pituitaries in animals pretreated with E regained the capacity to release as much LH at 5 h after treatment as those treated with C at a time when LH concentrations were still suppressed by E. Thus, the hypothalamus or an extra-hypothalamic area may be involved in maintaining the suppression of LH secretion after the initial effect on the pituitary has declined.     

Dehydroepiandrosterone therapy in men with angiographically verified coronary heart disease: the effects on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and fibrinogen plasma concentrations

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of DHEA therapy on fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) plasma concentrations in men with decreased serum DHEA-S levels and angiographically verified coronary heart disease (CHD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included thirty men aged 41-60 years (mean age 52 +/- 0.90 yr) with serum DHEA-S concentration < 2000 mg/l, who were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Subjects completed the 80 days study of 40 days of 150 mg oral DHEA daily or placebo, and next groups were changed after 30 days of wash-out. Fasting early morning blood samples were obtained at baseline and after each treatment to determine serum hormones levels (testosterone, DHEA-S, LH, FSH and estradiol) and also fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) plasma concentrations. RESULTS: Administration of DHEA was associated with 4.5-fold increase in DHEA-S levels. Estrogen levels significantly increased after DHEA from 22.1 +/- 0.7 pg/ml to 26.4 +/- 1.6 pg/l (mean +/- SEM; p < 0.05), while testosterone levels did not changed. Fibrinogen concentrations significantly decreased in DHEA group from 4.5 +/- 0.3 g/l to 3.83 +/- 0.2 g/l (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Changes of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) were not statistical significant (respectively: 8.37 +/- 0.4 ng/ml vs. 8.93 +/- 0.5 ng/ml and 82.3 +/- 6.3 ng/ml vs. 92.7 +/- 9.1 ng/ml (mean +/- SEM; NS vs. placebo). Tolerance of the treatment was good and no adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: DHEA therapy in dose of 150 mg daily during 40 days in men with DHEAS levels < 2000 mg/l and angiographically verified coronary heart disease (CHD) was connected with significant decreasing of fibrinogen concentration and increasing of estradiol levels, and did not influence on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) plasma concentrations.     

Effects of suckling and of a long interval after ovariectomy on hypothalamo-hypophyseal responsiveness to naloxone, morphine and GnRH in beef cows

The response of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) to morphine, naloxone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in ovariectomized, suckled (n=4) and nonsuckled (n=3) cows was investigated. Six months after ovariectomy and calf removal, the cows were challenged with 1mg, i.v. naloxone/kg body weight and 1 mg i.v. morphine/kg body weight in a crossover design; blood was collected at 15-minute intervals for 7 hours over a 3-day period. To evaluate LH secretion and pituitary responsiveness, 5 mug of GnRH were administered at Hour 6 on Day 1. On Days 2 and 3, naloxone or morphine was administered at Hour 3, followed by GnRH (5 mug/animal) at Hour 6. Mean preinjection LH concentrations (3.6 +/- 0.2 and 4.7 +/- 0.2 ng/ml), LH pulse frequency (0.6 +/- 0.1 and 0.8 +/- 0.1 pulses/hour) and LH pulse amplitude (2.9 +/- 0.5 and 2.9 +/- 0.6 ng/ml) were similar for suckled and nonsuckled cows, respectively. Morphine decreased (P < 0.01) mean serum LH concentrations (pretreatment 4.2 +/- 0.2 vs post-treatment 2.2 +/- 0.2 ng/ml) in both suckled and nonsuckled cows; however, mean serum LH concentrations remained unchanged after naloxone. Nonsuckled cows had a greater (P < 0.001) LH response to GnRH than did suckled cows (area of response curve: 1004 +/- 92 vs 434 +/- 75 arbitrary units). We suggest that opioid receptors are functionally linked to the GnRH secretory system in suckled and nonsuckled cows that had been ovariectomized for a long period of time. However, gonadotropin secretion appears not to be regulated by opioid mechanisms, and suckling inhibits pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in this model.     

Reevaluation of immunoreactive gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) levels in general circulation in women: changes in levels and episodic patterns before, during and after gonadotropin surges

In order to reevaluate the earlier varying data regarding circulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), we assayed extracted GnRH from the plasma frequently collected at mid-cycle in 11 women. For the analysis of episodic GnRH patterns and basal levels, blood samples were obtained at 6 h intervals for 72 h and at 15 min intervals for 2 h every 12 h throughout the experimental period. All blood samples were assayed for GnRH and selected samples for LH, FSH, estradiol and progesterone. For GnRH assay, 5 or 6 ml of blood was mixed with 60 mg of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, disodium salt, and 3 mg of phenylmethylsulfonyl floride immediately after blood collection. These enzyme inhibitors prevented the destruction of GnRH in the blood at room temperature for at least 4 h. Plasma GnRH was extracted through several steps including florisil absorption, acidic extraction and washing with organic solvent. Nonspecific immunoreactivity in the plasma was markedly decreased through this extraction process. Our assay values (approximate range, 0.1-2.0 pg/ml) of plasma GnRH in normal women corresponded to the low range of those obtained by others who used the alcohol extraction method. The basal levels of GnRH did not change significantly throughout 3 different periods, i.e., before, during and after the LH surges, and fluctuated between a small range of 0.11 and 1.44 pg/ml. Although the peak levels of GnRH observed in its episodic patterns did not change between the periods before and during the LH surges, they decreased significantly after the LH surge compared with those seen during the LH surges (0.93 +/- 0.07 vs 1.17 +/- 0.09 pg/ml, p less than 0.05). The present data demonstrate that immunoreactive GnRH in the extracted peripheral plasma does not change significantly in its mean, basal and peak levels during the periovulatory period except for a minor but significant decrease in the peak levels shortly after an LH surge.