Spectroscopy of non-photochemical and photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves; evidence for a role of the light harvesting complex of Photosystem II in the regulation of energy dissipation

Dissipation of absorbed excitation energy as heat, measured by its effect on the quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence, is induced under conditions of excess light in order to protect the photosynthetic apparatus of plants from light-dependent damage. The spectral characteristics of this quenching have been compared to that due to photochemistry in the Photosystem II reaction centre using leaves of Guzmania monostachia. This was achieved by making measurements at 77K when fluorescence emission bands from each type of chlorophyll protein complex can be distinguished. It was demonstrated that photochemistry and non-photochemical dissipation preferentially quench different emission bands and therefore occur by dissimilar mechanisms at separate sites. It was found that photochemistry was associated with a preferential quenching of emission at 688 nm whereas the spectrum for rapidly reversible non-photochemical quenching had maxima at 683 nm and 698 nm, suggesting selective quenching of the bands originating from the light harvesting complexes of Photosystem II. Further evidence that this was occurring in the light harvesting system was obtained from the fluorescence excitation spectra recorded in the quenched and relaxed states.Abbreviations pH transthylakoid pH gradient - F_o minimum level of chlorophyll fluorescence when Photosystem II reaction centres are open - F_m maximum level of fluorescence when Photosystem II reaction centres are closed - F_v variable fluorescence F_m minus F_o - F'_o F_o in any quenched state - F_m F_m in any quenched state - LHCII light harvesting complexes of Photosystem II - PSI Photosystem I - PS II Photosystem II - qN non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence - qE non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence that occurs in the presence of a pH     

Light dependence of quantum yields of Photosystem II and CO2 fixation in C3 and C4 plants

The light dependence of quantum yields of Photosystem II (_II) and of CO₂ fixation were determined in C₃ and C₄ plants under atmospheric conditions where photorespiration was minimal. Calculations were made of the apparent quantum yield for CO₂ fixation by dividing the measured rate of photosynthesis by the absorbed light [A/I=_CO2 and of the true quantum yield by dividing the estimated true rate of photosynthesis by absorbed light [(A+R_l)/I_a=_CO2·], where R_L is the rate of respiration in the light. The dependence of the _II/_CO2 and _II/_CO2 ^* ratios on light intensity was then evaluated. In both C₃ and C₄ plants there was little change in the ratio of _II/_CO2 at light intensities equivalent to 10–100% of full sunlight, whereas there was a dramatic increase in the ratio at lower light intensities. Changes in the ratio of _II/_CO2 can occur because respiratory losses are not accounted for, due to changes in the partitioning of energy between photosystems or changes in the relationship between PS II activity and CO₂ fixation. The apparent decrease in efficiency of utilization of energy derived from PS II for CO₂ fixation under low light intensity may be due to respiratory loss of CO₂. Using dark respiration as an estimate of R_L, the calculated _II/_CO2 ^* ratio was nearly constant from full sunlight down to approx 5% of full sunlight, which suggests a strong linkage between the true rate of CO₂ fixation and PS II activity under varying light intensity. Measurements of photosynthesis rates and _II were made by illuminating upper versus lower leaf surfaces of representative C₃ and C₄ monocots and dicots. With the monocots, the rate of photosynthesis and the ratio of _II/_CO2 exhibited a very similar patterns with leaves illuminated from the adaxial versus the abaxial surface, which may be due to uniformity in anatomy and lack of differences in light acclimation between the two surfaces. With dicots, the abaxial surface had both lower rates of photosynthesis and lower _II values than the adaxial surface which may be due to differences in anatomy (spongy versus palisade mesophyll cells) and/or light acclimation between the two surfaces. However, in each species the response of _II/_CO2 to varying light intensity was similar between the two surfaces, indicating a comparable linkage between PS II activity and CO₂ fixation.Abbreviations A measured rate of CO₂ assimilation - A+R_L true rate of CO₂ assimilation; e - CO₂ estimate of electrons transported through PSII per CO₂ fixed by RuBP carboxylase - f fraction of light absorbed by Photosystem II - F'_m yield of PSII chlorophyll fluorescence due to a saturating flash of white light under steady-state photosynthesis - F_s variable yield of fluorescence under steady-state photosynthesis; PPFD-photosynthetic photon flux density - I_a absorbed PPFD - PS II Photosystem II - R_d rate of respiration in the dark - R_I rate of respiration in the light estimated from measurement of R_d or from analysis of quantum yields - apparent quantum yield of CO₂ assimilation under a given condition (A/absorbed PPFD) - true quantum yield of CO₂ assimilation under a given condition [(A+R_L)/(absorbed PPFD)] - quantum yield for photosynthetic O₂ evolution - electrons transported via PS II per quantum absorbed by PS II Supported by USDA Competitive Grant 90-37280-5706.     

On the relationship between the quantum yield of Photosystem II electron transport,as determined by chlorophyll fluorescence and the quantum yield of CO2-dependent O2 evolution

We tested the two empirical models of the relationship between chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis, previously published by Weis E and Berry JA 1987 (Biochim Biophys Acta 894: 198–208) and Genty B et al. 1989 (Biochim Biophys Acta 990: 87–92). These were applied to data from different species representing different states of light acclimation, to species with C₃ or C₄ photosynthesis, and to wild-type and a chlorophyll b-less chlorina mutant of barley. Photosynthesis measured as CO₂-saturated O₂ evolution and modulated fluorescence were simultaneously monitored over a range of photon flux densities. The quantum yields of O₂ evolution (ØO₂) were based on absorbed photons, and the fluorescence parameters for photochemical (q_p) and non-photochemical (q_N) quenching, as well as the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence during steady-state illumination (F'_v/F'_m), were determined. In accordance with the Weis and Berry model, most plants studied exhibited an approximately linear relationship between ØO₂/q_p (i.e., the yield of O₂ evolution by open Photosystem II reaction centres) and q_N, except for wild-type barley that showed a non-linear relationship. In contrast to the linear relationship reported by Genty et al. for q_p×F'_v/F'_m (i.e., the quantum yield of Photosystem II electron transport) and ØCO₂, we found a non-linear relationship between q_p×F'_v/F'_m and ØO₂ for all plants, except for the chlorina mutant of barley, which showed a largely linear relationship. The curvilinearity of wild-type barley deviated somewhat from that of other species tested. The non-linear part of the relationship was confined to low, limiting photon flux densities, whereas at higher light levels the relationship was linear. Photoinhibition did not change the overall shape of the relationship between q_p×F'_v/F'_m and ØO₂ except that the maximum values of the quantum yields of Photosystem II electron transport and photosynthetic O₂ evolution decreased in proportion to the degree of photoinhibition. This implies that the quantum yield of Photosystem II electron transport under high light conditions may be similar for photoinhibited and non-inhibited plants. Based on our experimental results and theoretical analyses of photochemical and non-photochemical fluoresce quenching processes, we conclude that both models, although not universal for all plants, provide useful means for the prediction of photosynthesis from fluorescence parameters. However, we also discuss that conditions which alter one or more of the rate constants that determine the various fluorescence parameters, as well as differential light penetration in assays for oxygen evolution and fluorescence emission, may have direct effect on the relationships of the two models.Abbreviations F₀ and F'₀ fluorescence when all Photosystem II reaction centres are open in dark- and light-acclimated leaves, respectively - F_m and F'_m fluorescence when all Photosystem II reaction centres are closed in dark and light, respectively - F_v variable fluorescence equal to F_m-F₀ - F_s steady state level of fluorescence in light - F'_v and F'_m variable (F'_m-F'₀) and maximum fluorescence under steady state light conditions - HEPES N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethane-sulphonic acid - Q_A the primary, stabile quinone acceptor of Photosystem II - q_N non-photochemical quenching of fluorescence - q_p photochemical quenching of fluorescence - ØO₂ quantum yield of CO₂-saturated O₂ evolution based on absorbed photons     

Theoretical assessment of alternative mechanisms for non-photochemical quenching of PS II fluorescence in barley leaves

The components of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching (qN) in barley leaves have been quantified by a combination of relaxation kinetics analysis and 77 K fluorescence measurements (Walters RG and Horton P 1991). Analysis of the behaviour of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and oxygen evolution at low light (when only state transitions — measured as qN_t — are present) and at high light (when only photoinhibition — measured as qN_i — is increasing) showed that the parameter qN_t represents quenching processes located in the antenna and that qN_i measures quenching processes located in the reaction centre but which operate significantly only when those centres are closed. The theoretical predictions of a variety of models describing possible mechanisms for high-energy-state quenching, measured as the residual quenching, qN_e, were then tested against the experimental data for both fluorescence quenching and quantum yield of oxygen evolution. Only one model was found to agree with these data, one in which antennae exist in two states, efficient in either energy transfer or energy dissipation, and in which those photosynthetic units in a dissipative state are unable to exchange energy with non-dissipative units.Abbreviations: F_o, F_m room-temperature chlorophyll fluorescence yield with all centres open, closed - F_v variable fluorescence yield - LHC II light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex of PS II - PS I, PS II Photosystem I, II - P700, P680 primary donor in Photosystem I, II - Q_A primary electron acceptor of PS II - P_max maximum quantum yield of oxygen evolution - qN coefficient of non-photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence - qN_e, qN_t, qN_i coefficient of non-photochemical quenching due to high-energy-state, state transition, photoinhibition - qO coefficient of quenching of dark level fluorescence - qP coefficient of photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence - _P intrinsic quantum yield of open PS II reaction centres = _s/qP - _{PS 2} quantum yield of PS = qP × F_v/F_m - _S quantum yield of oxygen evolution = rate of oxygen evolution/light intensity     

Cyclic electron flow around Photosystem II in vivo

The oxygen flash yield (Y_O2) and photochemical yield of PS II (_{PS II}) were simultaneously detected in intact Chlorella cells on a bare platinum oxygen rate electrode. The two yields were measured as a function of background irradiance in the steady-state and following a transition from light to darkness. During steady-state illumination at moderate irradiance levels, Y_O2 and _{PS II} followed each other, suggesting a close coupling between the oxidation of water and Q_A reduction (Falkowski et al. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 933: 432–443). Following a light-to-dark transition, however, the relationship between Q_A reduction and the fraction of PS II reaction centers capable of evolving O₂ became temporarily uncoupled. _{PS II} recovered to the preillumination levels within 5–10 s, while the Y_O2 required up to 60 s to recover under aerobic conditions. The recovery of Y_O2 was independent of the redox state of Q_A, but was accompanied by a 30% increase in the functional absorption cross-section of PS II (_{PS II}). The hysteresis between Y_O2 and the reduction of Q_A during the light-to-dark transition was dependent upon the reduction level of the plastoquinone pool and does not appear to be due to a direct radiative charge back-reaction, but rather is a consequence of a transient cyclic electron flow around PS II. The cycle is engaged in vivo only when the plastoquinone pool is reduced. Hence, the plastoquinone pool can act as a clutch that disconnects the oxygen evolution from photochemical charge separation in PS II.Abbreviations ADRY acceleration of the deactivation reactions of the water-splitting enzyme (agents) - Chl chlorophyll - cyt cytochrome - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - F_O minimum fluorescence yield in the dark-adapted state - F_I minimum fluorescence yield under ambient irradiance or during transition from the light-adapted state - F_M maximum fluorescence yield in the dark-adapted state - F_M maximum fluorescence yield under ambient irradiance or during transition from light-adapted state - F_V, F_V variable fluorescence (F_V=F_M–F_O ; F_V=F_M–F_I) - FRR fast repetition rate (fluorometer) - _{PS II} quantum yield of Q_A reduction (_{PS II}=(F_M – F_O)/F_M or _{PS II})=(F_M= – F_I=)/F_M=) - LHCII Chl a/b light harvesting complexes of Photosystem II - OEC oxygen evolving complex of PS II - P680 reaction center chlorophyll of PS II - PQ plastoquinone - POH₂ plastoquinol - PS I Photosystem I - PS II Photosystem II - RC II reaction centers of Photosystem II - PS II the effective absorption cross-section of PHotosystem II - TL thermoluminescence - Y_O2 oxygen flash yield The US Government right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty free licence in and to any copyright is acknowledged.     

Mechanisms for controlling balance between light input and utilisation in the salt tolerant alga Dunaliella C9AA

The yield of photosynthetic O₂ evolution was measured in cultures of Dunaliella C9AA over a range of light intensities, and a range of low temperatures at constant light intensity. Changes in the rate of charge separation at Photosystem I (PS I) and Photosystem II (PS II) were estimated by the parameters _{PS I} and _{PS II} . _{PS I} is calculated on the basis of the proportion of centres in the correct redox state for charge separation to occur, as measured spectrophotometrically. _{PS II} is calculated using chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate the proportion of centres in the correct redox state, and also to estimate limitations in excitation delivery to reaction centres. With both increasing light intensity and decreasing temperature it was found that O₂ evolution decreased more than predicted by either _{PS I} or _{PS II}. The results are interpreted as evidence of non-assimilatory electron flow; either linear whole chain, or cyclic around each photosystem.Abbreviations F₀ dark level of chlorophyll fluorescence yield (PS II centres open) - F_m maximum level of chlorophyll fluorescence yield (PS II centres closed) - F_v variable fluorescence (F_m-F₀) - PS I Photosystem I - PS II Photosystem II - P₇₀₀ reaction centre chlorophyll(s) of PS I - q_N coefficient of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence - q_P coefficient of photochemical quenching of fluorescence yield - q_E high-energy-state quenching coefficient - _{PS I} yield of PS I - _{PS II} yield of PS II - _S yield of photosynthetic O₂ evolution - _P intrinsic yield of open PS II centres     

Photosystem II reaction centres stay intact during low temperature photoinhibition

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis was studied in intact barley leaves at 5 and 20°C, to reveal if Photosystem II becomes predisposed to photoinhibition at low temperature by 1) creation of excessive excitation of Photosystem II or, 2) inhibition of the repair process of Photosystem II. The light and temperature dependence of the reduction state of Q_A was measured by modulated fluorescence. Photon flux densities giving 60% of Q_A in a reduced state at steady-state photosynthesis (300 mol m^–2s^–1 at 5°C and 1200 mol m^–2s^–1 at 20°C) resulted in a depression of the photochemical efficiency of Photosystem II (F_v/F_m) at both 5 and 20°C. Inhibition of F_v/F_m occurred with initially similar kinetics at the two temperatures. After 6h, F_v/F_m was inhibited by 30% and had reached steady-state at 20°C. However, at 5°C, F_v/F_m continued to decrease and after 10h, F_v/F_m was depressed to 55% of control. The light response of the reduction state of Q_A did not change during photoinhibition at 20°C, whereas after photoinhibition at 5°C, the proportion of closed reaction centres at a given photon flux density was 10–20% lower than before photoinhibition.Changes in the D1-content were measured by immunoblotting and by the atrazine binding capacity during photoinhibition at high and low temperatures, with and without the addition of chloramphenicol to block chloroplast encoded protein synthesis. At 20°C, there was a close correlation between the amount of D1-protein and the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, both in the presence or in the absence of an active repair cycle. At 5°C, an accumulation of inactive reaction centres occurred, since the photochemical efficiency of Photosystem II was much more depressed than the loss of D1-protein. Furthermore, at 5°C the repair cycle was largely inhibited as concluded from the finding that blockage of chloroplast encoded protein synthesis did not enhance the susceptibility to photoinhibition at 5°C.It is concluded that, the kinetics of the initial decrease of F_v/F_m was determined by the reduction state of the primary electron acceptor Q_A, at both temperatures. However, the further suppression of F_v/F_m at 5°C after several hours of photoinhibition implies that the inhibited repair cycle started to have an effect in determining the photochemical efficiency of Photosystem II.Abbreviations CAP D-threochloramphenicol - F₀ and F ₀ fluorescence when all Photosystem II reaction centres are open in dark- and light-acclimated leaves, respectively - F_m and F _m fluorescence when all Photosystem II reaction centres are closed in dark- and light-acclimated leaves, respectively - F_s fluorescence at steady state - Q_A the primary, stable quinone acceptor of Photosystem II - q_N non-photochemical quenching of fluorescence - q_P photochemical quenching of fluorescence     

Short-term responses of Photosystem I to heat stress

When 23°C-grown potato leaves (Solanum tuberosum L.) were exposed for 15 min to elevated temperatures in weak light, a dramatic and preferential inactivation of Photosystem (PS) II was observed at temperatures higher than about 38°C. In vivo photoacoustic measurements indicated that, concomitantly with the loss of PS II activity, heat stress induced a marked gas-uptake activity both in far-red light (>715 nm) exciting only PS I and in broadband light (350–600 nm) exciting PS I and PS II. In view of its suppression by nitrogen gas and oxygen and its stimulation by high carbon-dioxide concentrations, the bulk of the photoacoustically measured gas uptake by heat-stressed leaves was ascribed to rapid carbon-dioxide solubilization in response to light-modulated stroma alkalization coupled to PS I-driven electron transport. Heat-induced gas uptake was observed to be insensitive to the PS II inhibitor diuron, sensitive to the plastocyanin inhibitor HgCl₂ and saturated at a rather high photon flux density of around 1200 E m^–2 s^–1. Upon transition from far-red light to darkness, the oxidized reaction center P700⁺ of PS I was re-reduced very slowly in control leaves (with a half time t_1/2 higher than 500 ms), as measured by leaf absorbance changes at around 820 nm. Heat stress caused a spectacular acceleration of the postillumination P700⁺ reduction, with t_1/2 falling to a value lower than 50 ms (after leaf exposure to 48°C). The decreased t_1/2 was sensitive to HgCl₂ and insensitive to diuron, methyl viologen (an electron acceptor of PS I competing with the endogenous acceptor ferredoxin) and anaerobiosis. This acceleration of the P700⁺ reduction was very rapidly induced by heat treatment (within less than 5 min) and persisted even after prolonged irradiation of the leaves with far-red light. After heat stress, the plastoquinone pool exhibited reduction in darkness as indicated by the increase in the apparent Fo level of chlorophyll fluorescence which could be quenched by far-red light. Application (for 1 min) of far-red light to heat-pretreated leaves also induced a reversible quenching of the maximal fluorescence level Fm, suggesting formation of a pH gradient in far-red light. Taken together, the presented data indicate that PS I responded to the heat-induced loss of PS II photochemical activity by catalyzing an electron flow from stromal reductants. Heat-stress-induced PS I electron transport independent of PS II seems to constitute a protective mechanism since block of this electron pathway in anaerobiosis was observed to result in a dramatic photoinactivation of PS I.Abbreviations PFD photon flux density - PS Photosystem - Apt and Aox amplitude of the photothermal and photobaric components of the photoacoustic signal, respectively - P700 reaction center pigment of PS I - Fo and Fm initial and maximal levels of chlorophyll fluorescence, respectively - Fv=Fm Fo-variable chlorophyll fluorescence - Q_A primary (stable) electron acceptor of PS II - DCMU (diuron) 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - Cyt cytochrome     

Chloroplast energization and oxidation of P700/plastocyanin in illuminated leaves at reduced levels of CO2 or oxygen

Chlorophyll fluorescence, light scattering, the electrochromic shift P₅₁₅ and levels of some photosynthetic intermediates were measured in illuminated leaves. Oxygen and CO₂ concentrations in the gas phase were varied in order to obtain information on control of Photosystem II activity under conditions such as produced by water stress, when stomatal closure restricts access of CO₂ to the photosynthetic apparatus. Light scattering and energy-dependent fluorescence quenching indicated a high level of chloroplast energization under high intensity illumination even when linear electron transport was curtailed in CO₂-free air or in 1% oxygen with 35 ll^-1 CO₂. Calculations of the phosphorylation potential based on measurements of phosphoglycerate, dihydroxyacetone phosphate and NADP revealed ratios of intrathylakoid to extrathylakoid proton concentrations, which were only somewhat higher in air containing 35 l l^-1 CO₂ than in CO₂-free air or 1% oxygen/35 l l^-1 CO₂. Anaerobic conditions prevented appreciable chloroplast energization. Acceptor-limitation of electron flow resulted in a high reduction level of the electron transport chain, which is characterized by decreased oxidation of P₇₀₀, not only under anaerobic conditions, but also in air, when CO₂ was absent, and in 1% oxygen, when the CO₂ concentration was reduced to 35 ll^-1. Efficient control of electron transport was indicated by the photoaccumulation of P₇₀₀ ⁺ at or close to the CO₂ compensation point in air. It is proposed to require the interplay between photorespiratory and photosynthetic electron flows, electron flow to oxygen and cyclic electron flow. The field-indicating electrochromic shift (P₅₁₅) measured as a rapid absorption decrease on switching the light off followed closely the extent of photoaccumulation of P₇₀₀ ⁺ in the light.Abbreviations F, F₀, F₀, F_M, F_M chlorophyll fluorescence levels - GA glyceraldehyde - P₅₁₅ field indicating rapid absorption change peaking at 522 nm - Q_A primary quinone acceptor in Photosystem II - Q_N non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence - Q_q photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence     

A simple model relating photoinhibitory fluorescence quenching in chloroplasts to a population of altered Photosystem II reaction centers

A model is presented describing the relationship between chlorophyll fluorescence quenching and photoinhibition of Photosystem (PS) II-dependent electron transport in chloroplasts. The model is based on the hypothesis that excess light creates a population of inhibited PS II units in the thylakoids. Those units are supposed to posses photochemically inactive reaction centers which convert excitation energy to heat and thereby quench variable fluorescence. If predominant photoinhibition of PS II and cooperativity in energy transfer between inhibited and active units are presumed, a quasi-linear correlation between PS II activity and the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence, F_VF_M, is obtained. However, the simulation does not result in an inherent linearity of the relationship between quantum yield of PS II and F_VF_M ratio. The model is used to fit experimental data on photoinhibited isolated chloroplasts. Results are discussed in view of current hypotheses of photoinhibition.Abbreviations F_M maximum total fluorescence - F₀ initial fluorescence - F_V maximum variable fluorescence - PS Photosystem - Q_A, Q_B primary and secondary electron acceptors of Photosystem II     

Slow exciton trapping in Photosystem II: A possible physiological role

Photosystem II, which has a primary photochemical charge separation time of about 300 ps, is the slowest trapping of all photosystems. On the basis of an analysis of data from the literature this is shown to be due to a number of partly independent factors: a shallow energy funnel in the antenna, an energetically shallow trap, exciton dynamics which are partly trap limited and a large antenna. It is argued that the first three of these properties of Photosystem II can be understood in terms of protective mechanisms against photoinhibition. These protective mechanisms, based on the generation of non photochemical quenching states mostly in the peripheral antenna, are able to decrease pheophytin reduction under conditions in which the primary quinone, Q_A, is already reduced, due to the slow trapping properties. The shallow antenna funnel is important in allowing quenching state-protective mechanisms in the peripheral antenna.Abbreviations chl chlorophyll - PS I Photosystem I - PS II Photosystem II - Q_A the primary quinone acceptor - RC reaction centre - RT room temperature     

Electron transport to oxygen mitigates against the photoinactivation of Photosystem II in vivo

The role of electron transport to O₂ in mitigating against photoinactivation of Photosystem (PS) II was investigated in leaves of pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown in moderate light (250 mol m^–2 s^–1). During short-term illumination, the electron flux at PS II and non-radiative dissipation of absorbed quanta, calculated from chlorophyll fluorescence quenching, increased with increasing O₂ concentration at each light regime tested. The photoinactivation of PS II in pea leaves was monitored by the oxygen yield per repetitive flash as a function of photon exposure (mol photons m^–2). The number of functional PS II complexes decreased nonlinearly with increasing photon exposure, with greater photoinactivation of PS II at a lower O₂ concentration. The results suggest that electron transport to O₂, via the twin processes of oxygenase photorespiration and the Mehler reaction, mitigates against the photoinactivation of PS II in vivo, through both utilization of photons in electron transport and increased nonradiative dissipation of excitation. Photoprotection via electron transport to O₂ in vivo is a useful addition to the large extent of photoprotection mediated by carbon-assimilatory electron transport in 1.1% CO₂ alone.Abbreviations Fm, Fo, Fv- maximal, initial (corresponding to open PS II traps) and variable chlorophyll fluorescence yield, respectively - NPQ- non-photochemical quenching - PS- photosystem - Q_A- primary quinone acceptor - qP- photochemical quenching coefficient     

The relationship between Photosystem II intrinsic quantum yield and millisecond luminescence in thylakoids

The relationship between charge recombination at Photosystem II (PS II), as indicated by millisecond luminescence, and PS II quantum yield was studied in spinach thylakoids during electron flow to methylviologen. Under the low magnesium conditions used, a decrease in quantum yield was observed in the absence of non-photochemical excitation quenching, and therefore cannot be due to a restriction in excitation delivery to the reaction centre. It was found that the decrease of the parameter _p, which is a measure of the intrinsic quantum yield of open PS II centers, correlates with an increase in luminescence per open center. The relationship between these two parameters was the same whether _p was manipulated by dissipation of the transthylakoid pH gradient or of the electrical potential. This indicates that the mechanism by which _p decreases depends in the same way on the two components of the protonmotive force as does the charge recombination at PS II. Calculation of the yield of luminescence with respect to the back reaction will be necessary to determine whether the charge recombination occurs at a sufficiently high rate to be directly responsible for the _p decrease.     

Two forms of the Photosystem II D1 protein alter energy dissipation and state transitions in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942

Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 (Anacystis nidulans R2) contains two forms of the Photosystem II reaction centre protein D1, which differ in 25 of 360 amino acids. D1: 1 predominates under low light but is transiently replaced by D1:2 upon shifts to higher light. Mutant cells containing only D1:1 have lower photochemical energy capture efficiency and decreased resistance to photoinhibition, compared to cells containing D1:2. We show that when dark-adapted or under low to moderate light, cells with D1:1 have higher non-photochemical quenching of PS II fluorescence (higher q_N) than do cells with D1:2. This is reflected in the 77 K chlorophyll emission spectra, with lower Photosystem II fluorescence at 697–698 nm in cells containing D1:1 than in cells with D1:2. This difference in quenching of Photosystem II fluorescence occurs upon excitation of both chlorophyll at 435 nm and phycobilisomes at 570 nm. Measurement of time-resolved room temperature fluorescence shows that Photosystem II fluorescence related to charge stabilization is quenched more rapidly in cells containing D1:1 than in those with D1:2. Cells containing D1:1 appear generally shifted towards State II, with PS II down-regulated, while cells with D1:2 tend towards State I. In these cyanobacteria electron transport away from PS II remains non-saturated even under photoinhibitory levels of light. Therefore, the higher activity of D1:2 Photosystem II centres may allow more rapid photochemical dissipation of excess energy into the electron transport chain. D1:1 confers capacity for extreme State II which may be of benefit under low and variable light.Abbreviations D1 the atrazine-binding 32 kDa protein of the PS II reaction centre core - D1:1 the D1 protein constitutively expressed during acclimated growth in Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 - D1:2 an alternate form of the D1 protein induced under excess excitation in Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea - Fo minimal fluorescence in the dark-adapted state - Fo minimal fluorescence in a light-adapted state - F_M maximum fluorescence with all quenching mechanisms at a minimum, measured in presence of DCMU - F_M maximal fluorescence in a light-adapted state, measured with a saturating flash - F_Mdark maximal fluorescence in the dark-adapted state - F_V variable fluorescence in a light-adapted state (F_M-Fo) - PAM pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer - q_N non-photochemical quenching of PS II fluorescence - q_N (dark) q_N in the dark adapted state - q_P photochemical quenching of fluorescence     

Regulation of electron transport in maize mesophyll chloroplasts: The relationship between chlorophyll a fluorescence quenching and O2 evolution

The relationship between the redox state of the primary electron acceptor of photosystem II (Q_A) and the rate of O₂ evolution in isolated mesophyll chloroplasts from Zea mays L. is examined using pulse-modulated chlorophyll a fluorescence techniques. A linear relationship between photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence (q_Q) and the rate of O₂ evolution is evident under most conditions with either glycerate 3-phosphate or oxaloacetate as substrates. There appears to be no effect of the transthylakoid pH gradient on the rate of electron transfer from photosystem II into Q_A in these chloroplasts. However, the proportion of electron transport occurring through cyclic-pseudocyclic pathways relative to the non-cyclic pathway appears to be regulated by metabolic demand for ATP. The majority of non-photochemical quenching in these chloroplasts at moderate irradiances appeared to be energy-dependent quenching.Abbreviations and symbols PSII photosystem II - Fm maximum fluorescence obtained on application of a saturating light pulse - Fo basal fluorescence recorded in the absence of actinic light (i.e. all PSII traps are open) - Fv Fm-Fo - q_Q photochemical quenching - q_NP non-photochemical quenching - q_E energy-dependent quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence     

Heat sensitivity of chloroplasts and leaves: Leakage of protons from thylakoids and reversible activation of cyclic electron transport

In illuminated intact spinach chloroplasts, warming to and beyond 40 °C increased the proton permeability of thylakoids before linear electron transport through Photosystem II was inhibited. Simultaneously, antimycin A-sensitive cyclic electron transport around Photosystem II was activated with oxygen or CO2, but not with nitrite as electron acceptors. Between 40 to 42 °C, activation of cyclic electron transport balanced the loss of protons so that a sizeable transthylakoid proton gradient was maintained. When the temperature of darkened spinach leaves was slowly increased to 40°C, reduction of the quinone acceptor of Photosystem II, Q_A, increased particularly when respiratory CO2 production and autoxidation of plastoquinones was inhibited by decreasing the oxygen content of the atmosphere from 21 to 1%. Simultaneously, Photosystem II activity was partially lost. The enhanced dark Q_A reduction disappeared after the leaf temperature was decreased to 20 °C. No membrane energization was detected by light-scattering measurements during heating the leaf in the dark. In illuminated spinach leaves, light scattering and nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence increased during warming to about 40 °C while Photosystem II activity was lost, suggesting extra energization of thylakoid membranes that is unrelated to Photosystem II functioning. After P700 was oxidized by far-red light, its reduction in the dark was biphasic. It was accelerated by factors of up to 10 (fast component) or even 25 (slow component) after short heat exposure of the leaves. Similar acceleration was observed at 20 °C when anaerobiosis or KCN were used to inhibit respiratory oxidation of reductants. Methyl viologen, which accepts electrons from reducing side of Photosystem II, completely abolished heat-induced acceleration of P700+ reduction after far-red light. The data show that increasing the temperature of isolated chloroplasts or intact spinach leaves to about 40 °C not only inhibits linear electron flow through Photosystem II but also activates Photosystem I-driven cyclic electron transport pathways capable of contributing to the transthylakoid proton gradient. Heterogeneity of the kinetics of P700+ reduction after far-red oxidation is discussed in terms of Photosystem I-dependent cyclic electron transport in stroma lamellae and grana margins.     

Temperature-dependent changes in Photosystem II heterogeneity support a cycle of Photosystem II during photoinhibition

High light treatments were given to attached leaves of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) at room temperature and at 1°C where the diffusion- and enzyme-dependent repair processes of Photosystem II are at a minimum. After treatments, electron transfer activities and fluorescence induction were measured from thylakoids isolated from the treated leaves. When the photoinhibition treatment was given at 1°C, the Photosystem II electron transfer assays that were designed to require electron transfer to the plastoquinone pool showed greater inhibition than electron transfer from H₂O to paraphenyl-benzoquinone, which measures all PS II centers. When the light treatment was given at room temperature, electron transfer from H₂O to paraphenyl-benzoquinone was inhibited more than whole-chain electron transfer. Variable fluorescence measured in the presence of ferricyanide decreased only during room-temperature treatments. These results suggest that reaction centers of one pool of Photosystem II, non-Q_B-PS II, replace photoinhibited reaction centers at room temperature, while no replacement occurs at 1°C. A simulation of photoinhibition at 1°C supports this conclusion.Abbreviations BSA bovine serum albumin - Chl chlorophyll - DCMU 3-(3,4,-dichlorophenyl)-1,1,-dimethylurea - DCPIP dichlorophenol-indophenol (2,6-dichloro-4((4-hydroxyphenyl)imino)-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-one) - DPC diphenyl carbazide (2,2-diphenylcarbonic dihydrazide) - FeCN ferricyanide (hexacyanoferrate(III)) - _app apparent quantum yield of photosynthetic oxygen evolution - MV methyl viologen (1,1-dimethyl-4,4-bipyridinium dichloride) - PPBQ phenyl-p-benzoquinone - PPFD photosynthetic photon flux density - PQ pool plastoquinone - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor of PS II - RT room temperature - WC whole chain electron transfer     

Light-dependent modification of Photosystem II in spinach leaves

In dark-adapted spinach leaves approximately one third of the Photosystem II (PS II) reaction centers are impaired in their ability to transfer electrons to Photosystem I. Although these inactive PS II centers are capable of reducing the primary quinone acceptor, Q_A, oxidation of Q_A ^– occurs approximately 1000 times more slowly than at active centers. Previous studies based on dark-adapted leaves show that minimal energy transfer occurs from inactive centers to active centers, indicating that the quantum yield of photosynthesis could be significantly impaired by the presence of inactive centers. The objective of the work described here was to determine the performance of inactive PS II centers in light-adapted leaves. Measurements of PS II activity within leaves did not indicate any increase in the concentration of active PS II centers during light treatments between 10 s and 5 min, showing that inactive centers are not converted to active centers during light treatment. Light-induced modification of inactive PS II centers did occur, however, such that 75% of these centers were unable to sustain stable charge separation. In addition, the maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence associated with inactive PS II centers decreased substantially, despite the lack of any overall quenching of the maximum fluorescence yield. The effect of light treatment on inactive centers was reversed in the dark within 10–20 mins. These results indicate that illumination changes inactive PS II centers into a form that quenches fluorescence, but does not allow stable charge separation across the photosynthetic membrane. One possibility is that inactive centers are converted into centers that quench fluorescence by formation of a radical, such as reduced pheophytin or oxidized P680. Alternatively, it is possible that inactive PS II centers are modified such that absorbed excitation energy is dissipated thermally, through electron cycling at the reaction center.Abbreviations A518 absorbance change at 518 nm, reflecting the formation of an electric field across the thylakoid membrane - A_FL1 amplitude of the fast (<100 ms) phase of A518 induced by the first of two saturating, single-turnover flashes spaced 30 ms apart - A_FL2 amplitude of the fast (<100 ms) phase of A518 induced by the second of two saturating, single-turnover flashes spaced 50 ms apart - DCBQ 2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone - Fo yield of chlorophyll fluorescence when Q_A is fully oxidized - Fm yield of chlorophyll fluorescence when Q_A is fully reduced - Fx yield of chlorophyll fluorescence when Q_A is fully reduced at inactive PS II centers, but fully oxidized at active PS II centers - Pheo pheophytin - P680 the primary donor of Photosystem II - PPFD photosynthetic photon flux density - Q_A Primary quinone acceptor of PS II - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor of PS II     

Functional size of Photosystem II determined by radiation inactivation

The functional size of Photosystem II (PS II) was investigated by radiation inactivation. The technique provides an estimate of the functional mass required for a specific reaction and depends on irradiating samples with high energy -rays and assaying the remaining activity. The analysis is based on target theory that has been modified to take into account the temperature dependence of radiation inactivation of proteins. Using PS II enriched membranes isolated from spinach we determined the functional size of primary charge separation coupled to water oxidation and quinone reduction at the Q_B site: H₂O (Mn)₄ Y_z P680 Pheophytin Q phenyl-p-benzoquinone. Radiation inactivation analysis indicates a functional mass of 88 ± 12 kDa for electron transfer from water to phenyl-p-benzoquinone. It is likely that the reaction center heterodimer polypeptides, D1 and D2, contribute approximately 70 kDa to the functional mass, in which case polypeptides adding up to approximately 20 kDa remain to be identified. Likely candidates are the and subunits of cytochrome b ₅₅₉and the 4.5 kDa psbI gene product.Abbreviations Cyt cytochrome - PS Photosystem - P680 primary electron donor of Photosystem II - Q_A primary quinone acceptor of Photosystem II - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor of Photosystem II - Y_z tyrosine donor to P680     

Electron transport and photophosphorylation by Photosystem I in vivo in plants and cyanobacteria

Recently, a number of techniques, some of them relatively new and many often used in combination, have given a clearer picture of the dynamic role of electron transport in Photosystem I of photosynthesis and of coupled cyclic photophosphorylation. For example, the photoacoustic technique has detected cyclic electron transport in vivo in all the major algal groups and in leaves of higher plants. Spectroscopic measurements of the Photosystem I reaction center and of the changes in light scattering associated with thylakoid membrane energization also indicate that cyclic photophosphorylation occurs in living plants and cyanobacteria, particularly under stressful conditions.In cyanobacteria, the path of cyclic electron transport has recently been proposed to include an NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, a complex that may also participate in respiratory electron transport. Photosynthesis and respiration may share common electron carriers in eukaryotes also. Chlororespiration, the uptake of O₂ in the dark by chloroplasts, is inhibited by excitation of Photosystem I, which diverts electrons away from the chlororespiratory chain into the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Chlororespiration in N-starved Chlamydomonas increases ten fold over that of the control, perhaps because carbohydrates and NAD(P)H are oxidized and ATP produced by this process.The regulation of energy distribution to the photosystems and of cyclic and non-cyclic phosphorylation via state 1 to state 2 transitions may involve the cytochrome b ₆-f complex. An increased demand for ATP lowers the transthylakoid pH gradient, activates the b ₆-f complex, stimulates phosphorylation of the light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex of Photosystem II and decreases energy input to Photosystem II upon induction of state 2. The resulting increase in the absorption by Photosystem I favors cyclic electron flow and ATP production over linear electron flow to NADP and poises the system by slowing down the flow of electrons originating in Photosystem II.Cyclic electron transport may function to prevent photoinhibition to the photosynthetic apparatus as well as to provide ATP. Thus, under high light intensities where CO₂ can limit photosynthesis, especially when stomates are closed as a result of water stress, the proton gradient established by coupled cyclic electron transport can prevent over-reduction of the electron transport system by increasing thermal de-excitation in Photosystem II (Weis and Berry 1987). Increased cyclic photophosphorylation may also serve to drive ion uptake in nutrient-deprived cells or ion export in salt-stressed cells.There is evidence in some plants for a specialization of Photosystem I. For example, in the red alga Porphyra about one third of the total Photosystem I units are engaged in linear electron transfer from Photosystem II and the remaining two thirds of the Photosystem I units are specialized for cyclic electron flow. Other organisms show evidence of similar specialization.Improved understanding of the biological role of cyclic photophosphorylation will depend on experiments made on living cells and measurements of cyclic photophosphorylation in vivo.Abbreviations CCCP carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone - cyt cytochrome - DBMIB 2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone - DCCD dicyclohexylcarbodiimide - DCHC dicyclohexyl-18-crown-6 - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - FCCP carbonylcyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone - LHC light harvesting chlorophyll - LHCP II light harvesting chlorophyll protein of Photosystem II - PQ plastoquinone - PS I, II Photosystem I, II - SHAM salicyl hydroxamic acid - TBT Tri-n-butyltin CIW/DPB Publication No. 1146