Ligand-binding specificities of laminin-binding integrins: a comprehensive survey of laminin-integrin interactions using recombinant alpha3beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha7beta1 and alpha6beta4 integrins.

The interactions of cells with basement membranes are primarily mediated via the engagement of laminins by a group of integrin family proteins, including integrins alpha3beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha7beta1 and alpha6beta4. To explore the ligand-binding specificities of these laminin-binding integrins, we produced these integrins, including two alpha7beta1 splice variants (alpha7X1beta1 and alpha7X2beta1), as soluble recombinant proteins and determined their binding specificities and affinities toward a panel of purified laminin isoforms containing distinct alpha chains. Among the five laminin-binding integrins investigated, alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta4 exhibited a clear specificity for laminin-332 (alpha3beta3gamma2) and laminin-511 (alpha5beta1gamma1)/521 (alpha5beta2gamma1), while integrin alpha6beta1 showed a broad specificity, binding to all laminin isoforms with a preference for laminin-111 (alpha1beta1gamma1), laminin-332 and laminin-511/521. The two alpha7beta1 variants were distinct from alpha3beta1, alpha6beta1 and alpha6beta4 in that they did not bind to laminin-332. alpha7X1beta1 bound to all laminins, except laminin-332, with a preference for laminin-211 (alpha2beta1gamma1)/221 (alpha2beta2gamma1) and laminin-511/521, while alpha7X2beta1 bound preferentially to laminin-111 and laminin-211/221. Laminin-511/521 was the most preferred ligand for all the laminin-binding integrins, except for alpha7X2beta1, whereas laminin-411 was the poorest ligand, capable of binding to alpha6beta1 and alpha7X1beta1 with only modest binding affinities. These comprehensive analyses of the interactions between laminin-binding integrins and a panel of laminins clearly demonstrate that the isoforms of both integrins and laminins differ in their binding specificities and affinities, and provide a molecular basis for better understanding of the adhesive interactions of cells with basement membranes of defined laminin compositions.     

Characterization of the ligand-binding specificities of integrin alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 using a panel of purified laminin isoforms containing distinct alpha chains

Integrins alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 are two major laminin receptors expressed on the surface of mammalian cells. Interactions of cells with laminins through these integrins play important roles in cell adhesion, differentiation, motility, and matrix assembly. To determine the binding specificity and affinity of these integrins toward various types of laminins at the level of direct protein-protein interactions, we purified integrins alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 from human placenta, and examined their binding to a panel of laminin isoforms, each containing distinct alpha chains (i.e., laminin-1, laminin-2/4, laminin-5, laminin-8, and laminin-10/11). Integrin alpha3beta1 showed clear specificity for laminin-5 and laminin-10/11, with no significant binding to laminin-1, laminin-2/4, and laminin-8. In contrast, integrin alpha6beta1 showed a broad spectrum of specificity, with apparent binding affinity in the following order: laminin-10/11 > laminin-5 > laminin-1 > laminin-2/4 congruent with laminin-8. Integrin titration assays demonstrated that laminin-10/11 was the most preferred ligand among the five distinct laminin isoforms for both alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 integrins. Given that laminin-10/11 is the major basement membrane component of many adult tissues, the interaction of laminin-10/11 with these integrins should play a central role in the adhesive interactions of epithelial cells with underlying basement membranes.     

P-selectin and E-selectin. Distinct but overlapping leukocyte ligand specificities.

P-selectin on platelets and endothelial cells and E-selectin on endothelial cells are leukocyte receptors that recognize lineage-specific carbohydrates on neutrophils and monocytes. The proposed ligands for these receptors contain the Le(x) core and sialic acid. Since other investigators have shown that both E-selectin and P-selectin bind to sialylated Le(x), we evaluated whether E-selectin and P-selectin recognize the same counter-receptor on leukocytes. The interaction of HL60 cells with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing P-selectin or E-selectin was studied. To determine whether a protein component is required in addition to sialyl Le(x) for either P-selectin or E-selectin recognition, HL60 cells or neutrophils were digested with proteases, including chymotrypsin, elastase, proteinase Glu-C, ficin, papain, or thermolysin. Cells treated with these proteases bound E-selectin but not P-selectin. Fucosidase or neuraminidase treatment of HL60 cells markedly decreased binding to both E-selectin- and P-selectin-expressing CHO cells. Growth of HL60 cells in tunicamycin inhibited the ability of these cells to support P-selectin-mediated binding and, to a lesser extent, E-selectin-mediated binding. Purified P-selectin inhibited CHO:P-selectin binding to HL60 cells, but incompletely inhibited CHO:E-selectin binding to HL60 cells. However, purified soluble E-selectin inhibited CHO:P-selectin and CHO:E-selectin binding to HL60 cells equivalently and completely. COS cells, unable to bind to E-selectin or P-selectin, bound E-selectin but not P-selectin upon transfection with alpha-1,3-fucosyltransferase or alpha-1,3/1,4-fucosyltransferase. Similarly, LEC 11 cells expressing sialyl Le(x) bound E-selectin- but not P-selectin-expressing CHO cells. Sambucus nigra lectin, specific for the sialyl-2,6 beta Gal/GalNAc linkage, inhibited P-selectin but not E-selectin binding to HL60 cells. Although sialic acid and Le(x) are components of the P-selectin ligand and the E-selectin ligand, these results indicate that the ligands are related, having overlapping specificities, but are structurally distinct. A protein component containing sialyl Le(x) in proximity to sialyl-2,6 beta Gal structures on the P-selectin ligand may contribute to its specificity for P-selectin.     

The role of alpha and beta chains in ligand recognition by beta 7 integrins

Integrins alpha(E)beta(7) and alpha(4)beta(7) are involved in localization of leukocytes at mucosal sites. Although both alpha(E)beta(7) and alpha(4)beta(7) utilize the beta(7) chain, they have distinct binding specificities for E-cadherin and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1), respectively. We found that mutation of the metal ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS) in the alpha(E) A-domain (D190A) abolished E-cadherin binding, as did mutation F298A on the A-domain surface near the MIDAS cleft. A docking model of the A-domain with E-cadherin domain 1 indicates that coordination of the alpha(E) MIDAS metal ion by E-cadherin Glu(31) and a novel projection of Phe(298) into a hydrophobic pocket on E-cadherin provide the basis for the interaction. The location of the binding site on the alpha(E) A-domain resembles that on other integrins, but its structure appears distinctive and particularly adapted to recognize the tip of E-cadherin, a unique integrin ligand. Additionally, mutation of the beta(7) MIDAS motif (D140A) abolished alpha(E)beta(7) binding to E-cadherin and alpha(4)beta(7)-mediated adhesion to MAdCAM-1, and alpha(4) chain mutations that abrogated binding of alpha(4)beta(1) to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and fibronectin similarly reduced alpha(4)beta(7) interaction with MAdCAM-1. Thus, although specificity can be determined by the integrin alpha or beta chain, common structural features of both subunits are required for recognition of dissimilar ligands.     

The LG1-3 tandem of laminin alpha5 harbors the binding sites of Lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule and alpha3beta1/alpha6beta1 integrins

The laminin-type globular (LG) domains of laminin alpha chains have been implicated in various cellular interactions that are mediated through receptors such as integrins, alpha-dystroglycan, syndecans, and the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein (Lu). Lu, an Ig superfamily transmembrane receptor specific for laminin alpha5, is also known as basal cell adhesion molecule (B-CAM). Although Lu/B-CAM binds to the LG domain of laminin alpha5, the binding site has not been precisely defined. To better delineate this binding site, we produced a series of recombinant laminin trimers containing modified alpha chains, such that all or part of alpha5LG was replaced with analogous segments of human laminin alpha1LG. In solid phase binding assays using a soluble Lu (Lu-Fc) composed of the Lu extracellular domain and human IgG1 Fc, we found that Lu bound to Mr5G3, a recombinant laminin containing alpha5 domains LN through LG3 fused to human laminin alpha1LG4-5. However, Lu/B-CAM did not bind other recombinant laminins containing alpha5LG3 unless alpha5LG1-2 was also present. A recombinant alpha5LG1-3 tandem lacking the laminin coiled coil (LCC) domain did not reproduce the activity of Lu/B-CAM binding. Therefore, proper structure of the alpha5LG1-3 tandem with the LCC domain was essential for the binding of Lu/B-CAM to laminin alpha5. Our results also suggest that the binding site for Lu/B-CAM on laminin alpha5 may overlap with that of integrins alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1.     

An angiogenic laminin site and its antagonist bind through the alpha(v)beta3 and alpha5beta1 integrins.

Angiogenesis is important for wound healing, tumor growth, and metastasis. Endothelial cells differentiate into capillary-like structures on a laminin-1-rich matrix (Matrigel). We previously identified 20 angiogenic sites on laminin-1 (alpha1beta1gamma1) by screening 559 overlapping synthetic peptides. C16, the most potent gamma1 chain peptide, blocked laminin-1-mediated adhesion and was the only gamma1 chain peptide to block attachment to both collagen I and fibronectin. This suggested that C16 was acting via a receptor common to these substrates. We demonstrated that C16 is angiogenic in vivo. Affinity chromatography identified the integrins alpha5beta1 and alpha(v)beta3 as surface receptors. Blocking antibodies confirmed the role of these receptors in C16 adhesion. C16 does not contain an RGD sequence and, as expected, an RGD-containing peptide did not block C16 adhesion nor did C16 act via MAP kinase phosphorylation. Furthermore, we identified a C16 scrambled sequence, C16S, which antagonizes the angiogenic activity of bFGF and of C16 by binding to the same receptors. Because the laminin gamma1 chain is ubiquitous in most tissues, C16 is likely an important functional site. Since the biological activity of C16 is blocked by a scrambled peptide, C16S may serve as an anti-angiogenic therapeutic agent.     

Human colon carcinoma cells use multiple receptors to adhere to laminin: involvement of alpha 6 beta 4 and alpha 2 beta 1 integrins.

In this study, we used clone A, a human colon carcinoma cell line, to characterize those integrins that mediate colon carcinoma adhesion to laminin. Monoclonal antibodies specific for the human beta 1 subunit inhibited clone A adhesion to laminin. They also precipitated a complex of surface proteins that exhibited an electrophoretic behavior characteristic of alpha 2 beta 1 and alpha 3 beta 1. A monoclonal antibody specific for alpha 2 (PIH5) blocked clone A adhesion to laminin, as well as to collagen I. An alpha 3-specific antibody (P1B5) had no effect on clone A adhesion to laminin, even though it can block the adhesion of other cell types to laminin. Thus, the alpha 2 beta 1 integrin can function as both a laminin and collagen I receptor on clone A cells. Although these cells express alpha 3 beta 1, an established laminin receptor, they do not appear to use it to mediate laminin adhesion. In addition, the monoclonal antibody GoH3, which recognizes the alpha 6 integrin subunit, also inhibited carcinoma adhesion to laminin but not to fibronectin or collagen I. This antibody precipitated the alpha 6 subunit in association with the beta 4 subunit. There was no evidence of alpha 6 beta 1 association on these cells. In summary, the results obtained in this study indicate that multiple integrin alpha subunits, in association with two distinct beta subunits, are involved in colon carcinoma adhesion to laminin. Based on the behavior of alpha 3 beta 1 and alpha 2 beta 1, the results also suggest that cells can regulate the ability of a specific integrin to mediate adhesion.     

Differential expression of laminin isoform (alpha2), integrins (alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta4) and cytokeratin 20 in H. pylori gastritis

The expression of laminin-1 chains (beta1 and gamma1), laminin-2 (merosin), integrin receptors to laminin (alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta4) and cytokeratin (CK20) were studied by immunohistochemical methods in gastric biopsies from antrum of 25 patients. H. pylori gastritis was found in 19 cases and intestinal metaplasia (IM) in four from these 19. Another 13 biopsies, all with IM were immunostained to laminin-2. Laminin-1 chains in normal and gastritis areas without IM were expressed as a strong, linear and continuous deposit in the basement membranes of the superficial and glandular epithelium. In metaplastic glands the reactivity to laminin-1 chains was decreased. Merosin was discontinuous when a moderate to accentuated H. pylori glandular colonization was present. Samples with IM were negative to laminin-2. The alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta4 integrins were negative only in IM gastric biopsies. The CK20 immunoreactivity was strong and homogeneous in the cells at the tip and the upper portion of foveolae in normal areas and in gastritis with IM the reactivity to CK 20 was heterogeneous. A differential expression of laminin isoforms is related to inflammation and subsequent IM caused by H. pylori. The alterations of alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta4 parallel both modifications in merosin and CK20 expression in H. pylori chronic gastritis.     

Circulating integrins: alpha 5 beta 1, alpha 6 beta 4 and Mac-1, but not alpha 3 beta 1, alpha 4 beta 1 or LFA-1.

The alpha 5 beta 1, alpha 6 beta 4 and Mac-1 integrins all participate in the endocytotic cycle. By contrast, alpha 3 beta 1, alpha 4 beta 1 and LFA-1 do so much more slowly, or not at all, in the cell lines examined. This indicates that the alpha-chains appear to determine whether an integrin cycles or not, and that alpha 5 beta 1, alpha 6 beta 4 and Mac-1 can be brought to the leading edge of a moving cell by endocytosis and recycling.     

Distinct structural requirements for binding of the integrins alphavbeta6, alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5, alpha5beta1 and alpha9beta1 to osteopontin.

The extracellular matrix protein, osteopontin, is a ligand for several members of the integrin family, including alpha5beta1, alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5 and alpha9beta1. Osteopontin is a substrate for a number of extracellular proteases, including thrombin and the metalloproteases MMP-3 and MMP-7, which cleave osteopontin at sites close to or within the mapped integrin binding sites. Using affinity chromatography and cell adhesion assays, we now identify the integrin alphavbeta6 as an additional osteopontin receptor. Utilizing a series of recombinant forms of osteopontin, we compared the structural requirements for alphavbeta6 binding with those for the 4 other osteopontin-binding integrins. Like alpha5beta1, alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 (but not alpha9beta1), alphavbeta6 binds to the RGD site in osteopontin, since RGD peptide or mutation of this site to RAA completely inhibits alphavbeta6-mediated cell adhesion. For both alpha9beta1 and alpha5beta1, the N-terminal fragment generated by thrombin cleavage is a much better ligand than full length osteopontin, whereas thrombin-cleavage does not appear to be required for optimal adhesion to alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5 or alphavbeta6. A recombinant fragment predicted to be generated by MMP cleavage no longer supported alpha5beta1 or alpha9beta1-mediated adhesion, but adhesion mediated by alphavbeta5 or alphavbeta6 was unaffected. Finally, adhesion of alphavbeta5 or alphavbeta6 was inhibited by mutation of two aspartic acid residues upstream of the RGD site, whereas adhesion mediated by alphavbeta3, alpha5beta1 or alpha9beta1 was unaffected by these mutations. These results suggest that the hierarchy of integrin interactions with osteopontin can undergo complex regulation at least in part through the action of extracellular proteases.     

Domain IVa of laminin alpha5 chain is cell-adhesive and binds beta1 and alphaVbeta3 integrins through Arg-Gly-Asp.

The globular domain IVa from the short arm region of mouse laminin alpha5 chain was obtained by recombinant production and shown to be a cell-adhesive substrate and to bind alphaVbeta3 integrin in solid-phase assays. These interactions were blocked by RGD peptides and a restricted panel of anti-integrin antibodies. The two RGD sequences present in alpha5IVa were shown by site-directed mutagenesis to make different contributions to cell adhesion but were equivalent in binding alphaVbeta3 integrin. A quantitative radioimmuno-inhibition assay was established based on domain alpha5IVa which demonstrated distinct amounts of alpha5 chain in various tissues, particularly in vessel walls. There it could play a role in angiogenesis steps requiring RGD-dependent integrins.     

Contribution of alpha2beta1, alpha3beta1, alpha6beta4 integrins and 67 kDa laminin receptor to the interaction of epidermoid carcinoma A-431 cells with laminin-2/4

Laminin-2/4 is the major laminin isoform of normal muscle and nerve tissues and plays an important role in tumor invasion and metastasis. Despite the fact that laminin-2/4 has been found in the skin basement membrane, insufficient evidence is available on the effect of laminin-2/4 on the behavior of both normal and transformed skin cells. A comparison of the contribution of alpha2beta1, alpha3beta1, alpha6beta4 integrins and 67 kDa laminin receptor on the surface of the human epidermoid carcinoma cell, A-431, to interaction with laminin-2/4 was carried out. The cell interaction with extracellular matrix component is a multistage process. We employed new methods for studying different stages of the interaction of A-431 cells with laminin-2/4. We demonstrated that integrins alpha2beta1, alpha3beta1, alpha6beta4 and 67 kDa laminin receptor are involved in the interaction of A-431 cells with laminin-2/4. We found that contribution of the same receptors to different stages of the interaction with laminin can be different. alpha2beta1 integrins are involved in EGF-induced A-431 cells' migration on laminin-2/4. We demonstrated the cooperation between alpha2beta1 and alpha3beta1 integrins during adhesion and spreading of A-431 cells on laminin-2/4-coated substrate. These results provide information about laminin-2/4 receptors and their contribution to different stages of the interaction with cells.     

Comparative assessment of the ligand and metal ion binding properties of integrins alpha9beta1 and alpha4beta1

Integrins alpha9beta1 and alpha4beta1 form a distinct structural class, but while alpha4beta1 has been subjected to extensive study, alpha9beta1 remains poorly characterized. We have used the small molecule N-(benzenesulfonyl)-(L)-prolyl-(L)-O-(1-pyrrolidinylcarbonyl)tyrosine (3) to investigate the biochemical properties of alpha9beta1 and directly compare these properties with those of alpha4beta1. Compound 3 has a high affinity for both integrins with K(D) values of < or =3 and 180 pM for alpha9beta1 in 1 mM Mn2+ (activating) and 1 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Mg2+ (nonactivating) conditions and < or =5 and 730 pM for alpha4beta1 under the corresponding conditions. Ca2+ treatment promoted the binding of 3 to both integrins (EC50 = 30 microM Ca2+ in both cases). Compound 3 binding to both integrins was also stimulated by the addition of the activating monoclonal antibody TS2/16. These findings indicate that the mechanisms by which metal ions and TS2/16 regulate ligand binding to alpha9beta1 and alpha4beta1 are similar. The binding of 3 to both integrins induced the mAb 9EG7 LIBS epitope, a property consistent with occupancy of the receptor's ligand binding site by 3. But whereas EGTA treatment inhibited the binding of 9EG7 to alpha4beta1, it stimulated the binding of 9EG7 to alpha9beta1. The 9EG7 and TS2/16 effects point to contributions of the beta1-chains on binding. Cross-linking data revealed that the integrin alpha-chains are also involved in binding the small molecule, as stable linkages were observed on both the alpha9 chain of alpha9beta1 and the alpha4 chain of alpha4beta1. Extensive structure-activity analyses with natural and synthetic ligands indicate distinct features of the ligand binding pockets. Most notable was the estimated >1000-fold difference in the affinity of the integrins for VCAM-1, which binds alpha4beta1with an apparent K(D) of 10 nM and alpha9beta1 with an apparent K(D) of >10 microM. Differences were also seen in the binding of alpha9beta1 and alpha4beta1 to osteopontin. Compound 3 competed effectively for the binding of VCAM-1 and osteopontin to both integrins. While these studies show many similarities in the biochemical properties of alpha9beta1 and alpha4beta1, they identify important differences in their structure and function that can be exploited in the design of selective alpha9beta1 and alpha4beta1 inhibitors.     

Distinct acidic clusters and hydrophobic residues in the alternative splice domains X1 and X2 of alpha7 integrins define specificity for laminin isoforms

The binding specificity of alpha7beta1 integrins for different laminin isoforms is defined by the X1 and X2 splice domains located in the beta-propeller domain of the alpha7 subunit. In order to gain insight into the mechanism of specific laminin-integrin interactions, we defined laminin-binding epitopes of the alpha7X1 and -X2 domains by single amino acid substitutions and domain swapping between X1 and X2. The interaction of mutated, recombinantly prepared alpha7X1beta1 and alpha7X2beta1 heterodimers with various laminin isoforms was studied by surface plasmon resonance and solid phase binding assays. The data show that distinct clusters of surface-exposed acidic residues located in different positions of the X1 and the X2 loops are responsible for the specific recognition of laminins. These residues are conserved between the respective X1 or X2 splice domains of the alpha7 chains of different species, some also in the corresponding X1/X2 splice domains of alpha6 integrin. Interestingly, ligand binding was also modulated by mutating surface-exposed hydrophobic residues (alpha7X1L205, alpha7X2Y208) at positions corresponding to the fibronectin binding synergy site in alpha5beta1 integrin. Mutations in X1 that affected binding to laminin-1 also affected binding to laminin-8 and -10, but not to the same extent, thus allowing conclusions on the specific role of individual surface epitopes in the selective recognition of laminin-1 versus laminins -8 and -10. The role of the identified epitopes was confirmed by molecular dynamics simulations of wild-type integrins and several inactivating mutations. The analysis of laminin isoform interactions with various X1/X2 chimaera lend further support to the key role of negative surface charges and pointed to an essential contribution of the N-terminal TARVEL sequence of the X1 domain for recognition of laminin-8 and -10. In conclusion, specific surface epitopes containing charged and hydrophobic residues are essential for ligand binding and define specific interactions with laminin isoforms.     

Alternative splice variants of alpha 7 beta 1 integrin selectively recognize different laminin isoforms.

The integrin alpha(7)beta(1) occurs in several cytoplasmic (alpha(7A), alpha(7B)) and extracellular splice variants (alpha(7X1), alpha(7X2)), which are differentially expressed during development of skeletal and heart muscle. The extracellular variants result from the alternative splicing of exons X1 and X2, corresponding to a segment within the putative ligand binding domain. To study the specificity and affinity of the X1/X2 variants to different laminin isoforms, soluble alpha(7)beta(1) complexes were prepared by recombinant coexpression of the extracellular domains of the alpha- and beta-subunits. The binding of these complexes to purified ligands was measured by solid phase binding assays. Surprisingly, the alternative splice variants revealed different and specific affinities to different laminin isoforms. While the alpha(7X2) variant bound much more strongly to laminin-1 than the alpha(7X1) variant, the latter showed a high affinity binding to laminins-8 and -10/11. Laminin-2, the major laminin isoform in skeletal muscle, was recognized by both variants, whereas none of the two variants were able to interact with laminin-5. A specific blocking antibody inhibited the binding of both variants to all laminins tested, indicating the involvement of common epitopes in alpha(7X1)beta(1) and alpha(7X2)beta(1). Because laminin-8 and -10/11 as well as alpha(7X1) are expressed in developing skeletal and cardiac muscle, these findings suggest that alpha(7X1)beta(1) may represent a physiological receptor with novel specificities for laminin-8 and -10.     

Interaction of integrins alpha 3 beta 1 and alpha 2 beta 1: potential role in keratinocyte intercellular adhesion

The colocalization of integrins alpha 2 beta 1 and alpha 3 beta 1 at intercellular contact sites of keratinocytes in culture and in epidermis suggests that these integrins may mediate intercellular adhesion (ICA). P1B5, an anti-alpha 3 beta 1 mAb previously reported to inhibit keratinocyte adhesion to epiligrin, was also found to induce ICA. Evidence that P1B5-induced ICA was mediated by alpha 2 beta 1 and alpha 3 beta 1 was obtained using both ICA assays and assays with purified, mAb-immobilized integrins. Selective binding of alpha 2 beta 1-coated beads to epidermal cells or plate-bound alpha 3 beta 1 was observed. This binding was inhibited by mAbs to integrin alpha 3, alpha 2, or beta 1 subunits and could be stimulated by P1B5. We also demonstrate a selective and inhibitable interaction between affinity- purified integrins alpha 2 beta 1 and alpha 3 beta 1. Finally, we show that expression of alpha 2 beta 1 by CHO fibroblasts results in the acquisition of collagen and alpha 3 beta 1 binding. Binding to both of these ligands is inhibited by P1H5, an anti-alpha 2 beta 1 specific mAb. Results of these in vitro experiments suggest that integrins alpha 2 beta 1 and alpha 3 beta 1 can interact and may do so to mediate ICA in vivo. Thus, alpha 3 beta 1 mediates keratinocyte adhesion to epiligrin and plays a second role in ICA via alpha 2 beta 1.     

Recognition of the neural chemoattractant Netrin-1 by integrins alpha6beta4 and alpha3beta1 regulates epithelial cell adhesion and migration

Netrins, axon guidance cues in the CNS, have also been detected in epithelial tissues. In this study, using the embryonic pancreas as a model system, we show that Netrin-1 is expressed in a discrete population of epithelial cells, localizes to basal membranes, and specifically associates with elements of the extracellular matrix. We demonstrate that alpha6beta4 integrin mediates pancreatic epithelial cell adhesion to Netrin-1, whereas recruitment of alpha6beta4 and alpha3beta1 regulate the migration of CK19+/PDX1+ putative pancreatic progenitors on Netrin-1. These results provide evidence for the activation of epithelial cell adhesion and migration by a neural chemoattractant, and identify Netrin-1/integrin interactions as adhesive/guidance cues for epithelial cells.     

Distinct roles of beta1 integrins during angiogenesis

Integrins are transmembrane receptors which bind extracellular matrix proteins and enable not only cell adhesion and cytoskeleton organization but also transduction of critical signals into the cells to promote survival, proliferation, differentiation, or migration programs. Integrins participate in many aspects of vascular biology. The past few years have experienced a sustained interest in the implication of integrin receptors in tumor angiogenesis. We will focus our review on studies giving concrete evidence to a role of the beta1 class of integrins in angiogenesis, and we will provide an overview of the molecular mechanisms involved in their action.     

Determinants of ligand binding specificity of the alpha(1)beta(1) and alpha(2)beta(1) integrins.

The alpha(1)beta(1) and alpha(2)beta(1) integrins are cell surface collagen receptors. Cells expressing the alpha(1)beta(1) integrin preferentially adhere to collagen IV, whereas cells expressing the alpha(2)beta(1) integrin preferentially adhere to collagen I. Recombinant alpha(1) and alpha(2) integrin I domains exhibit the same collagen type preferences as the intact integrins. In addition, the alpha(2) integrin I domain binds echovirus 1; the alpha(1) I domain does not. To identify the structural components of the I domains responsible for the varying ligand specificities, we have engineered several alpha(1)/alpha(2) integrin I domain chimeras and evaluated their virus and collagen binding activities. Initially, large secondary structural components of the alpha(2) I domain were replaced with corresponding regions of the alpha(1) I domain. Following analysis in echovirus 1 and collagen binding assays, chimeras with successively smaller regions of alpha(1) I were constructed and analyzed. The chimeras were analyzed by ELISA with several different alpha(2) integrin monoclonal antibodies to assess their proper folding. Three different regions of the alpha(1) I domain, when present in the alpha(2) I domain, conferred enhanced collagen IV binding activity upon the alpha(2) I domain. These include the alpha3 and alpha5 helices and a portion of the alpha6 helix. Echovirus 1 binding was lost in a chimera containing the alphaC-alpha6 loop; higher resolution mapping identified Asn(289) as playing a critical role in echovirus 1 binding. Asn(289) had not been implicated in previous echovirus 1 binding studies. Taken together, these data reveal the existence of multiple determinants of ligand binding specificities within the alpha(1) and alpha(2) integrin I domains.