Predicting toxicity in radiotherapy for prostate cancer

This comprehensive review addresses most organs at risk involved in planning optimization for prostate cancer. It can be considered an update of a previous educational review that was published in 2009 (Fiorino et al., 2009).The literature was reviewed based on PubMed and MEDLINE database searches (from January 2009 up to September 2015), including papers in press; for each section/subsection, key title words were used and possibly combined with other more general key-words (such as radiotherapy, dose-volume effects, NTCP, DVH, and predictive model). Publications generally dealing with toxicity without any association with dose–volume effects or correlations with clinical risk factors were disregarded, being outside the aim of the review.A focus was on external beam radiotherapy, including post-prostatectomy, with conventional fractionation or moderate hypofractionation (<4 Gy/fraction); extreme hypofractionation is the topic of another paper in this special issue. Gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity are the most investigated endpoints, with quantitative data published in the last 5 years suggesting both a dose–response relationship and the existence of a number of clinical/patient related risk factors acting as dose–response modifiers. Some results on erectile dysfunction, bowel toxicity and hematological toxicity are also presented.     

Enhanced dermatologic toxicity following concurrent treatment with palbociclib and radiation therapy: A case report

BackgroundCyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors represent a new class of targeted therapy options for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. There are currently no published prospective data on the safety of use of radiation treatment with palbociclib.CaseWe describe the case of a patient with metastatic breast cancer who received radiation treatment to a metastatic supraclavicular lymph node to planned 60 Gy in 30 fractions while on palbociclib, a selective inhibitor of CDK4/6. The patient developed early radiation toxicities including esophagitis and dermatitis that progressed to a severe left neck skin breakdown in the radiation field, resulting in the need for hospitalization. She had a break in treatment but was able to finish the radiation without palbociclib. Her tumor responded well to the treatment and her side effects healed.DiscussionTo our knowledge this is the first case to report on concurrent palbociclib and radiation use, with resultant enhanced radiation effects that required hospitalization for symptom management. Several preclinical studies have shown synergistic effects of radiation and both in vivo and in vitro experiments resulting in improved survival and decreased cell proliferation, respectively, through enhanced G1 cell cycle arrest.ConclusionThis case highlights the importance of using caution when combining radiation with the new targeted therapies. Until more data becomes available, physicians are recommended to exercise clinical judgment when deciding on whether to continue or discontinue a CDK4/6 inhibitor in a patient who may need radiation.     

Acute toxicity and quality of life in high risk prostate cancer patients: Updated results of randomized hypofractionation trial

Purpose

The aim of our study was to perform the final analysis of acute toxicity and quality of life data obtained from 221 consecutive patients who suffered from intermediate-to-high risk prostate cancer.

Tracheal cancer: Role of radiation therapy

Purpose

To assess the results of tracheal cancer patients treatment and factors influencing prognosis.

Background

Primary malignant neoplasms of the trachea are rare. The treatment of choice for tracheal carcinomas is resection. Radiation therapy is recommended as a part of radical treatment or for palliation of symptoms.

Materials and methods

Between 1962 and 2006, 50 patients diagnosed with tracheal cancer were treated at the Centre of Oncology in Krakow. The analysis focused on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival rates, univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, the log rank test and Cox''s proportional hazard method, respectively.For over 40 years, patients were treated using different modalities: surgery followed by radiotherapy (6%), radiotherapy (78%), chemoradiotherapy (8%), and symptomatic treatment (8%).

Results

The 5-year LRRFS was 18%, DFS was 15% and OS was 17%. gender (favoured females) was the only prognostic factor for LRRFS. For OS, the independent prognostic factors were performance status (favoured Karnofsky higher than 80), stage and year of start of the treatment (later than 1988 vs. earlier – 5-year OS 20% vs. 12%).5-year OS in the following (strongly differentiated over the time) treatment modalities were: surgery followed by radiotherapy (66%), radiotherapy (16%), chemoradiotherapy (0%), and symptomatic treatment (0%).Of 44 patients treated with radiotherapy symptomatic partial response was observed in 32 patients and follow-up imaging studies revealed complete response in 5 patients, partial response in 25, stable disease in 4 or progressive disease in 4.

Conclusions

Radical treatment in patients in early stage and good performance status seems to be correlated with the improvement of survival. However, despite the fact that results of treatment are poor, radiotherapy offers symptomatic improvement.     

Late toxicity for prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated helical tomotherapy

AimThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term tolerability of hypofractionated helical tomotherapy (HT) in localized prostate cancer patients.BackgroundPrevious hypofractionated schedules with conventional RT were associated with excessive toxicity, likely due to inadequate sophistication of treatment delivery. There are few data about late toxicity after HT.Materials and methodsWe evaluated 38 patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the prostate. There were 9 (24%), 15 (39%), and 14 (37%) patients with high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively. Patients were treated with hypofractionated HT from May 2008 to February 2011. Hypofractionation regimens included: 68.04 Gy at 2.52 Gy/fraction (N = 25; 66%), 70 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fraction (N = 4; 11%) and 70.2 Gy at 2.6 Gy/fraction (N = 9; 23%). Late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring system.ResultsMedian age at diagnosis was 70 years (range 49–80) and median follow-up, 5.8 years. Late grade 1, 2 and 3 GI toxicity were 13%, 24%, and 2.6%, respectively. Late grade 1, 2, 3 GU toxicity were 29%, 21%, and 8%, respectively. Sexual toxicity was evaluated in 19 patients to be grade 1, 2 in 11% and grade 3 in 16%. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with higher values of rectum V50 associated with late GI toxicity (P = 0.025). Patients with PSA ≤8 (P = 0.048) or comorbidities (P = 0.013) at diagnosis were associated with higher late GU toxicity. Additionally, PSA ≤8 also associated with moderate (grade ≥2) late GU toxicity in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.028).ConclusionsHypofractionated HT can be delivered safely with limited rates of moderate and severe late toxicity. The proportion of the rectum that receives a moderate and high dose, having comorbidities, and PSA at diagnosis seem to associate with long term toxicity.     

Volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients with hip prosthesis

Aim

To study the use of RapidArc techniques in the treatment of prostate cancer patients with hip prosthesis.

Background

An important aspect of treatment planning is to achieve dose homogeneity inside the planning target volume (PTV). Especially for those patients presenting with hip prosthesis, it becomes a challenging task to achieve dose uniformity inside the PTV.

Materials and methods

Five prostate patients presenting with hip prosthesis who had undergone radical radiotherapy were selected for this study. Depending on the composition of prosthesis, a predefined set of Hounsfield values were assigned to each study set. RapidArc plans were generated on an Eclipse treatment planning system. Two arcs that include clockwise and counter-clockwise arcs were used in all these cases. To avoid beams passing through the prosthesis, a simple structure was defined around it with 1 cm margin and a strict dose constraint applied to the block during VMAT optimization.

Results

The mean D2/D98 ratio of PTV for all the patients was 1.06 ± 0.01. The mean percentage rectum volume receiving 50 Gy, 60 Gy, 70 Gy and 75 Gy for all the patients were 33.1 ± 5.9, 21.7 ± 5.5, 13.8 ± 4.4 and 9.5 ± 3.0, respectively.

Conclusions

This study shows that using a double arc RapidArc technique is a simple and effective treatment method of treating prostate cancer in patients presenting with a hip prosthesis. The definition of a beam avoidance structure encompassing the prosthesis and applying strict dose constraints to it reduces the beam contribution to the prosthesis     

Socioeconomic differences in prostate cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundSince the 1990s, most nations have had a reduction or stabilisation in prostate cancer mortality. However, socioeconomic differences in disease specific mortality and survival have persisted. This has been partially attributed to differences in treatment choices. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to describe and quantify socioeconomic differences in use of prostate cancer treatment in the literature.MethodsMEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase were searched from 01 January 2000–01 April 2021 to identify articles that reported use of prostate cancer treatment by socioeconomic status. Random effects meta-analysis was used to analyse socioeconomic differences in treatment where there was more than one study for treatment type. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias.ResultsOut of 7267 articles identified, eight met the inclusion criteria and six were analysed using meta-analysis. Meta-analysis could only be completed for non-active treatment (watchful waiting/active surveillance). Lower education was associated with non-active treatment (OR=0.90, [95% CI 0.83–0.98], p=0.02, I²=67%), however, level of income was not (OR=0.87, [CI 0.75–1.02], p=0.08, I²=94%). Sensitivity analysis of studies where active surveillance was the outcome (n=3), indicated no associations with level of income (OR=0.91, [95% CI 0.82–1.01], p=0.08, I²=52%) or education (OR=0.88, [95% CI 0.70–1.10], p=0.25, I²=79%). All studies were assessed as high-risk of bias.DiscussionThe relationship between socioeconomic status and prostate cancer treatment depended on the socioeconomic variable being used, the treatment type and how it was defined in research. Considerable methodological limitations were identified. Further research should improve on previous findings and address current gaps.     

Neoadjuvant oral vs. infusional chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancer: Prognostic factors

Aim

To evaluate the prognostic factors and impact on survival of neoadjuvant oral and infusional chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Background

There is still no definitive consensus about the prognostic factors and the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on survival. Some studies have pointed to an improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with tumor downstaging (TD) and nodal downstaging (ND).

Materials and methods

A set of 159 patients with LARC were treated preoperatively. Group A – 112 patients underwent concomitant oral chemoradiotherapy: capecitabine or UFT + folinic acid. Group B – 47 patients submitted to concomitant chemoradiation with 5-FU in continuous infusion. 63.6% of patients were submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Group A: pathologic complete response (pCR) – 18.7%; TD – 55.1%; ND – 76%; loco-regional response – 74.8%. Group B: pCR – 11.4%; TD – 50%; ND – 55.8%; LRR – 54.5%. The loco-regional control was 95.6%. There was no difference in survival between both groups. Those with loco-regional response had better PFS.

Conclusions

Tumor and nodal downstaging, loco-regional response and a normal CEA level turned out to be important prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal cancer. Nodal downstaging and loco-regional response were higher in Group A. Those with tumor downstaging and loco-regional response from Group A had better OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on survival except in those patients with loco-regional response who achieved a higher PFS.     

Delta radiomics for rectal cancer response prediction using low field magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy: an external validation

IntroductionA recent study performed on 16 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated using magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has identified two delta radiomics features as predictors of clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (nCRT).This study aims to validate these features (ΔL_least and Δglnu) on an external larger dataset, expanding the analysis also for pathological complete response (pCR) prediction.MethodsA total of 43 LARC patients were enrolled: Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) was delineated on T2/T1* MR images acquired during MRgRT and the two delta features were calculated.Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on the 16 cases of the original study and the best cut-off value was identified. The performance of ΔL_least and Δglnu was evaluated at the best cut-off value.ResultsOn the original dataset of 16 patients, ΔL_least reported an AUC of 0.81 for cCR and 0.93 for pCR, while Δglnu 0.72 and 0.54 respectively.The best cut-off values of ΔL_least was 0.73 for both outcomes, while Δglnu reported 0.54 for cCR and 0.93 for pCR. At the external validation, ΔL_least showed an accuracy of 81% for cCR and 79% for pCR, while Δglnu reported 63% for cCR and 40% for pCR.ConclusionThe accuracy of ΔL_least in predicting cCR and pCR is significantly higher than those obtained considering Δglnu, but inferior if compared with other image-based biomarker, such as the early-regression index. Studies with larger cohorts of patients are recommended to further investigate the role of delta radiomic features in MRgRT.     

Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radiation therapy

Prostate cancers that clinically appear to be localized may nonetheless respond poorly to curative treatment. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy Gleason score, and percentage of positive biopsies are all at least as important as clinical stage in predicting treatment outcome. A patient with a nonpalpable tumor, stage T1c disease, serum PSA of 12 ng/mL, and a Gleason score of 8 to 10 in 2 of 12 biopsy cores has a relatively poor prognosis. In a high-risk patient such as this one, the recommended treatment strategy involves a combination of brachytherapy and conformal external beam radiotherapy. In studies comparing treatments in patients stratified according to a variety of risk measures, this combination has shown biochemical disease-free survival rates superior to those seen following radical prostatectomy. The role of androgen suppression remains unclear.     

The robustness of dual isocenter VMAT radiation therapy for bilateral lymph node positive breast cancer

PurposeTo investigate the use of dual isocenters for VMAT planning in patients with lymph node positive synchronous bilateral breast cancer (BBC) compared to a single isocenter option.MethodsTreatment plans of 11 patients with lymph node positive BBC were retrospectively analyzed using two different VMAT planning techniques: dual-isocenter split-arc VMAT plans (Iso2) were compared with mono-isocenter VMAT plans (Iso1). For Iso2 plans, PTV dose was investigated after introducing ±2 and ±5 mm couch shift errors between the two isocenters in the lateral, longitudinal and vertical direction.ResultsFor both techniques the planning aims for PTV coverage and OARs were met. The mean dose for the bilateral lungs and heart was reduced from 11.3 Gy and 3.8 Gy to 10.9 Gy (p < .05) and 3.6 Gy (p < .05), respectively, for Iso2 plans when compared to Iso1 plans. Positive statistically significant correlation (rho = 0.76, p = .006) was found between PTV volume and D2cc_PTV for Iso1 plans. No clinically significant change was seen in the D98_CTV or D2cc_PTV after the 2 and 5 mm errors were introduced between isocenters for Iso2 plans.ConclusionsThe split arc method was shown to be a feasible treatment technique in the case of synchronous BBC for both mono and dual isocenter techniques. The dose parameters were slightly favoring dual-isocenter option instead of mono-isocenter. The dual-isocenter method was shown to be a robust treatment option in the presence of ≤5 mm errors in the shifts between the two isocenters.     

Predicting toxicity for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy: an independent and external validation of MDASI-HN based nomogram

AimWe conducted a study to validate the MDASI-HN based nomogram, which is used to predict the acute toxicities in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy.BackgroundTolerance to radiation varies from patient to patient and also depends on various other factors like tumor volume, dose of radiation, chemotherapy. Predicting the toxicities allow us to identify potential candidates who are likely to have a higher toxicity and, in addition, evaluates the nomogram when done on an independent group of patients.Materials and MethodsSixty biopsy confirmed head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation were the subjects of the study. The patients completed patient reported outcome instrument (PRO) MDASI-HN questionnaire at the beginning and at the fifth week of radiation. The baseline score obtained was used to obtain the predicted score using nomogram. The nomogram was also externally validated as per the TRIPOD guidelines.ResultsThe mean baseline, predicted and score at the fifth week were 27.28 ± 11.04, 73.33 ± 15.51 and 82.62 ± 17.67, respectively, for all sub-sites. A positive, significant correlation (p < 0.01) between the predicted score and the score at the fifth week was seen across all sub sites such as Oral cavity (p = 0.05), Oropharynx (p = 0.02), Hypo pharynx (p = 0.02) and Larynx (p = 0.02).ConclusionThe MDASI-HN questionnaire based nomogram is simple, easily doable and takes into consideration the initial symptoms as well the treatment details; thereby, it is able to predict the toxicities accurately.     

Choosing between conventional and hypofractionated prostate cancer radiation therapy: Results from a study of shared decision-making

AimTo evaluate patient choice of prostate cancer radiotherapy fractionation, using a decision aid.BackgroundRecent ASTRO guidelines recommend patients with localised prostate cancer be offered moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy after discussing increased acute toxicity and uncertainty of long-term results compared to conventional fractionation.Materials and methodsA decision aid was designed to outline the benefits and potential downsides of conventionally and moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy. The aid incorporated the ASTRO guideline to outline risks and benefits.ResultsIn all, 124 patients with localised prostate cancer were seen from June-December 2018. Median age was 72 (range 50–90), 49.6 % were intermediate risk (50.4 % high risk). All except three patients made a choice using the aid; the three undecided patients were hypofractionated. In all, 33.9 % of patients chose hypofractionation: falling to 25.3 % for patients under 75 years, 24.3 % for patients living within 30 miles of the cancer centre, and 14.3 % for patients with baseline gastrointestinal symptoms. On multivariate analysis, younger age, proximity to the centre, and having baseline gastrointestinal symptoms significantly predicted for choosing conventional fractionation. Insurance status, attending clinician, baseline genitourinary symptoms, work/carer status, ECOG, cancer risk group and driving status did not impact choice. Reasons for choosing conventional fractionation were certainty of long-term results (84 %) and lower acute bowel toxicity (51 %).ConclusionsMost patients declined the convenience of moderate hypofractionation due to potentially increased acute toxicity, and the uncertainty of long-term outcomes. We advocate that no patient should be offered hypofractionation without a thorough discussion of uncertainty and acute toxicity.     

Retrospective comparison of rectal toxicity between carbon-ion radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on treatment plan,normal tissue complication probability model,and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer

This retrospective study assessed the treatment planning data and clinical outcomes for 152 prostate cancer patients: 76 consecutive patients treated by carbon-ion radiation therapy and 76 consequtive patients treated by moderate hypo-fractionated intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy. These two modalities were compared using linear quadratic model equivalent doses in 2 Gy per fraction for rectal or rectal wall dose–volume histogram, 3.6 Gy per fraction-converted rectal dose–volume histogram, normal tissue complication probability model, and actual clinical outcomes. Carbon-ion radiation therapy was predicted to have a lower probability of rectal adverse events than intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy based on dose–volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability model. There was no difference in the clinical outcome of rectal adverse events between the two modalities compared in this study.     

Functional imaging in radiation therapy planning for head and neck cancer

Functional imaging and its application to radiotherapy (RT) is a rapidly expanding field with new modalities and techniques constantly developing and evolving. As technologies improve, it will be important to pay attention to their implementation. This review describes the main achievements in the field of head and neck cancer (HNC) with particular remarks on the unsolved problems.     

Effect of accounting for interfractional CTV shape variations in PTV margins on prostate cancer radiation treatment plans

PurposeThe aim of this study was to account for interfractional clinical target volume (CTV) shape variation and apply this to the planning target volume (PTV) margin for prostate cancer radiation treatment plans.MethodsInterfractional CTV shape variations were estimated from weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images using statistical point distribution models. The interfractional CTV shape variation was taken into account in the van Herk’s margin formula. The PTV margins without and with the CTV shape variation, i.e., standard (PTV_ori) and new (PTV_shape) margins, were applied to 10 clinical cases that had weekly CBCT images acquired during their treatment sessions. Each patient was replanned for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk CTVs, using both margins. The dose indices (D98 and V70) of treatment plans with the two margins were compared on weekly pseudo-planning computed tomography (PCT) images, which were defined as PCT images registered using a deformable image registration technique with weekly CBCT images, including contours of the CTV, rectum, and bladder.ResultsThe percentage of treatment fractions of patients who received CTV D98 greater than 95% of a prescribed dose increased from 80.3 (PTV_ori) to 81.8% (PTV_shape) for low-risk CTVs, 78.8 (PTV_ori) to 87.9% (PTV_shape) for intermediate-risk CTVs, and 80.3 (PTV_ori) to 87.9% (PTV_shape) for high-risk CTVs. In most cases, the dose indices of the rectum and bladder were acceptable in clinical practice.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that interfractional CTV shape variations should be taken into account when determining PTV margins to increase CTV coverages.     

Preclinical toxicity biomarkers for combination treatment with clotting factors rFXIII and rFVIIa

Abstract

Combination treatment with the clotting factors recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), serine protease, and recombinant factor XIII (rFXIII), protransglutaminase, is being explored for haemostatic therapy. We performed a single-dose toxicology study in the cynomolgus monkey, with four dose groups receiving 0.1 + 0.34 mg kg^?1 (group 1), 0.33 + 1.12 mg kg^?1 (group 2), 1.67 + 5.60 mg kg^?1 (group 3) and 5.00 + 16.80 mg kg^?1 (group 4) of a rFVIIa + rFXIII combination. In the three lower dose groups, no clinical, histopathological or blood chemistry changes were observed. In group 4, the animals died at 4 h post-dosing, with histopathology revealing a systemic coagulopathy resembling, but distinct from, disseminated intravascular coagulation. Due to the absence of toxicity warning signs, toxicity biomarkers were identified by a Western blot-based screening of approximately 20 plasma proteins known to be involved in the clotting cascade. Three of the examined proteins were specifically affected by rFVIIa + rFXIII treatment. Fibronectin and fibrinogen exhibited dose-dependent reductions from less than 10% reduction (group 2) to more than 90% reduction (group 4). These reductions were reversible, and specific. For vitronectin, a dose-dependent conversion to the 65-kDa form was found to occur in groups 3 and 4. Thus, fibrinogen, fibronectin and vitronectin represent the first biomarkers for clotting factor toxicity.