Interaction of Wnt and activin in dorsal mesoderm induction in Xenopus.

Both the activin and Wnt families of peptide growth factors are capable of inducing dorsal mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Presumptive ventral ectoderm cells isolated from embryos injected with Xwnt8 mRNA were cultured in the presence of activin A to study the possible interactions between these two classes of signaling proteins. We find that overexpression of Xwnt8 RNA alters the response of ventral ectoderm to activin such that ventral explants differentiate dorsoanterior structures including notochord and eyes. This response is similar to the response of dorsal ectoderm to activin alone. When embryos are irradiated with uv light to inhibit dorsal axis formation, ectodermal explants differentiate notochord when they are induced by a combination of both signaling factors, but not when cells receive only one inducing signal (activin or Xwnt8). This result is further supported by the observation that goosecoid (gsc) mRNA, an early marker for dorsal mesoderm, is expressed in these explants only when they are injected with Xwnt8 mRNA followed by exposure to activin. Early morphogenetic movements of the induced cells and activation of muscle-specific actin and Brachyury (Xbra) genes also reveal a cooperation of activin A and Xwnt8 in mesoderm induction.     

A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development in Xenopus.

The process by which the vertebrate central nervous system acquires its regional properties remains a central problem in developmental biology. It is generally argued that at early gastrula stages the dorsal mesoderm possesses precise anterior-posterior positional information, which is subsequently imparted to the overlying ectoderm. However, using regionally specific gene probes to monitor regional responses in Xenopus embryos, we find that anterior-posterior properties are not fixed until early neurula stages. During gastrulation the regional inducing capacities of the dorsal mesoderm as well as the regional responses of the presumptive neural ectoderm are activated along the entire anterior-posterior axis when these properties are assayed in recombinant and explant experiments, respectively. Restriction of regional inducing capacity in the mesoderm and responsiveness in the neural ectoderm occur only at neural plate stages.     

Mesoderm induction and blood island formation by angiogenic growth factors and embryonic inducing factors

Factors which induce mesoderm, including endothelium lined cavities and primitive blood cells in omnipotent amphibian ectoderm, have been isolated from different sources. Recently it was shown that angiogenic factors, which belong to the protein families of the heparin binding growth factors (acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor) and the transforming growth factors (TGF-beta 1 and -beta 2), also induce mesodermal tissues in amphibian ectoderm. In triturus ectoderm, capillary like endothelial networks are induced preferentially by the transforming growth factors. The relationship between growth factors and inducing factors is discussed.     

Neural induction in embryos

Neural differentiation of the ectoderm is inhibited by bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) in amphibia as well as mammalia. This inhibition is released by neural inducing factor(s), which are secreted from the dorsal mesoderm. Masked neuralizing factor(s) are already present in the ectoderm before induction. In homogenates from Xenopus oocytes and embryos neural inducing factors were found in the supernatant (centrifuged at 105 000 g ), in small vesicles and a ribonucleoprotein fraction. A neuralizing factor, which is a protein of small size, has been partially purified from Xenopus gastrulae. Genes that are expressed in the dorsal mesoderm and involved in the de novo synthesis of neuralizing factor(s) have been cloned. The differentiation of cells with a neuronal fate starts in the neural plate immediately after neural induction. Genes homologous to the Notch and Delta genes of lateral inhibition in insects are involved in this process.     

The activation of a neuralizing factor in the neural plate is correlated with its homoiogenetic-inducing activity

Summary Neural plates which are induced in the dorsal ectoderm of Triturus by the underlying mesoderm acquire, in turn, neural-inducing activity. This process is correlated with the appearance of neural-inducing activity in the microsomal fraction of the neural plate homogenate. The high-speed supernatant also acquires inducing activity after neural induction, but to a lesser extent. The experiments suggest that a masked neuralizing factor, which is already present in the ectoderm, is in part activated and exported from the inducing neural plate cells.     

Xwnt-8 modifies the character of mesoderm induced by bFGF in isolated Xenopus ectoderm.

In Xenopus, growth factors of the TGF-beta, FGF and Wnt oncogene families have been proposed to play a role in generating embryonic pattern. In this paper we examine potential interactions between the bFGF and Xwnt-8 signaling pathways in the induction and dorsal-ventral patterning of mesoderm. Injection of Xwnt-8 mRNA into 2-cell Xenopus embryos does not induce mesoderm formation in animal cap ectoderm isolated from these embryos at the blastula stage, but alters the response of this tissue to mesoderm induction by bFGF. While animal cap explants isolated from non-injected embryos differentiate to form ventral types of mesoderm and muscle in response to bFGF, explants from Xwnt-8 injected embryos form dorsal mesodermal and neural tissues in response to the same concentration of bFGF, even if the ectoderm is isolated from the prospective ventral sides of embryos or from UV-ventralized animals. Our results support a model whereby dorso-ventral mesodermal patterning can be attained by a single mesoderm inducing agent, possibly bFGF, which is uniformly distributed across the prospective dorsal-ventral axis, and which acts in concert with a dorsally localized signal, possibly a Wnt protein, which either alters the response of ectoderm to induction or modifies the character of mesoderm after its induction.     

Role of BMP-4 in the inducing ability of the head organizer in Xenopus laevis

BMP-4 has been implicated in the patterning of the Dorsal-Ventral axis of mesoderm and ectoderm. In this study, we describe the posteriorizing effect of BMP-4 on the neural inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm (dorsal lip region) in Xenopus gastrulae. Dorsal lip explants dissected from stage 10.25 embryos retained anterior inducing ability when precultured for 6 hrs until sibling embryos reach stage 12. When the dorsal lips from stage 10.25 embryos were treated with a range of BMP-4 concentrations, posterior tissues were induced in adjacent ectoderm in a dose-dependent manner. Thus activin-treated explants able to act as head inducers can also induce posterior structures in the presence of BMP-4. To investigate whether BMP-4 directly affects the inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm, we blocked the BMP-4 signaling pathway by injection of mRNA encoding a truncated form of the BMP-4 receptor (tBR) mRNA. Under these conditions, activin-treated explants induced anterior tissues following BMP-4 treatment. Taken together, these results indicate that BMP-4 may affect the head inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm and confer trunk-tail inducing ability during Xenopus gastrulation.     

Expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in aneural Xenopus embryos

During gastrulation in vertebrate embryos, the mesoderm moves inward and under the ectoderm and these two cell layers subsequently differentiate in close proximity to each other, providing an opportunity for the exchange of inductive signals. This study examines whether the activation of muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) genes and the subsequent expression of receptors in Xenopus myotomal muscle are dependent on interaction between the ectoderm and the mesoderm, or their derivatives, after the onset of gastrulation. We eliminated such interaction by inducing total exogastrulation of Xenopus embryos. During exogastrulation, the mesoderm moves away from the ectoderm, and the nervous system fails to develop. Single channel recordings from the myotomal muscle of exogastrulated embryos revealed the presence of two major classes of AChRs, which could be distinguished on the basis of channel conductance. The current amplitudes, conductances, reversal potentials, and open times of these channels closely resembled those reported for the two major classes of AChR channels normally expressed in vivo. We conclude that interaction between ectoderm and mesoderm following the onset of gastrulation is not required for the future expression of the major classes of AChRs in myotomal muscle.     

Changes in states of commitment of single animal pole blastomeres of Xenopus laevis

The experiments described in this paper were designed to compare the normal fates of animal pole blastomeres of Xenopus laevis with their state of commitment. Single animal pole blastomeres were labeled with a lineage marker and transplanted into the blastocoels of host embryos of different stages. The distribution of labeled daughter cells in the tadpole reflects the state of commitment of the parent cell at the time of transplantation. It is known that cells from the animal pole of the early blastula normally contribute predominantly to ectoderm with a small, but significant, contribution to the mesoderm. We show that on transplantation to the blastocoels of late blastula host embryos these blastomeres are pluripotent, contributing to all three germ layers. At later stages the normal fate of these cells becomes restricted solely to ectoderm and concomitantly the proportion of pluripotent cells is reduced, although the results depend upon the stage of the host embryo. Blastomeres from late blastula donors transplanted to mid gastrulae contribute solely to ectoderm in 34% of cases; however, in earlier hosts, when the vegetal hemisphere cells have "mesoderm inducing" or "vegetalizing" activity, late blastula animal pole blastomeres contribute to mesoderm and endoderm rather than ectoderm. Thus during the blastula stage animal pole cells pass from pluripotency to a labile state of commitment to ectoderm.     

Mesoderm induction in the future tail region of Xenopus

Summary We have used interspecific grafts between Xenopus borealis and Xenopus laevis to study the signalling system that produces tail mesoderm. Early gastrula ectoderm grafted into the posterior neural plate region of neurulae responds to a mesodermal inducing signal in this region and forms mainly tail somites; this signal persists until at least the early tail bud stage. Ventral ectoderm grafted into the posterior neural plate loses its competence to respond to this signal after stage 10 1/2. We have established the specification of anterior and posterior neural plate ectoderm. In ectodermal sandwiches or when grafted into unusual positions, anterior regions gave rise to mainly nervous system and posterior regions to large amounts of muscle, together with some nervous system. Thus it was impossible to assess the competence of posterior neural plate ectoderm to form further mesoderm and hence to establish if mesodermal induction continues during neurulation in unmanipulated embryos.     

Morphogenesis of the chick embryo limb. Competence of the embryonic and extra-embryonic ectoderm

Ecto-mesodermal interactions were investigated during the initiation of limb development in avian embryos. Experiments were performed on 2-day chick embryos. They consisted in implanting prospective leg mesoderm at different medio-lateral levels of the trunk and also into the extra-embryonic area. The implanted mesoderm was thus brought into contact with embryonic or extra-embryonic cicatricial or healing ectoderm, the ability of which to participate in the formation of an ectopic leg was tested. Whatever the level of embryonic ectoderm tested in hosts ranging from stage 14 to 27 pairs of somites (axial, paraxial, flank, ventrum), the experiments resulted in the formation of supernumerary limbs. Their frequency was level-dependent and decreased for each level, with increasing age of the host. The weakest competence was observed in the ectoderm of the prospective ventrum, the strongest in that of the prospective flank, axial and paraxial ectoderm showing an intermediary competence. Extra-embryonic ectoderm of blastoderms of the same age was unable to respond to the inducing action of the implanted prospective leg mesoderm. It was found to be incompetent, even at younger stages (5 to 13 pairs of somites).     

Mix.1, a homeobox mRNA inducible by mesoderm inducers, is expressed mostly in the presumptive endodermal cells of Xenopus embryos

In frogs, mesoderm presumably derives from presumptive ectoderm by induction under the control of diffusible substances produced by the endoderm. To analyze the early phase of mesoderm induction, I have isolated cDNA copies of mRNAs induced in presumptive ectoderm by mesoderm inducing factor secreted by the XTC cell line. One of the inducible mRNAs encodes a homeodomain-containing protein that is likely to play a regulatory role in development. Mix.1 behaves as an immediate early response to induction, and its kinetics of expression suggest a major role for MBT in the control of inducible gene expression. Unexpectedly, Mix.1 is expressed mostly in the future endoderm, suggesting that endoderm may be formed by induction in a similar way as mesoderm.     

Cell-to-cell contact in primary embryonic induction: effects of lectin on electrical coupling and neural induction

The effects of lectin (concanavalin A; ConA) on the electrical coupling between inducing chorda-mesoderm and reacting ectoderm cells, and the realization of neural induction were investigated. The electrical coupling between cells of the chorda-mesoderm of the late gastrula (stage 13b) and the competent ectoderm or Con-A-treated ectoderm of the early gastrula (stage 12a) was measured. Neural induction was tested with ectoderm explants which had been combined with the inducing chorda-mesoderm for 1, 3 and 6 h. Electrical coupling was observed after 3 h. By 6 h, the coupling ratio had recovered to the same level as that between the homogeneous germ-layer cells. However, the electrical coupling did not recover in the combinant with Con-A-treated ectoderm. This suggests that Con-A disturbs close cell contact between the ectoderm and chorda-mesoderm cells. Neural induction was realized in the ectoderm which was combined with chorda-mesoderm for more than 3 h; this occurred parallel to the recovery of electrical coupling. In contrast, Con-A treatment (50 micrograms/ml) of the competent ectoderm for 30 min prevented neural induction. After 3 h of contact, the neural induction of Con-A-treated ectoderm was only one-third of that of the control ectoderm. The present study suggests that cellular contact between the inducing mesoderm and the ectoderm target cells plays an important role in the realization of neural induction.     

Hensen's node induces neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. Implications for the action of the organizer in neural induction.

The development of the vertebrate nervous system is initiated in amphibia by inductive interactions between ectoderm and a region of the embryo called the organizer. The organizer tissue in the dorsal lip of the blastopore of Xenopus and Hensen's node in chick embryos have similar neural inducing properties when transplanted into ectopic sites in their respective embryos. To begin to determine the nature of the inducing signals of the organizer and whether they are conserved across species we have examined the ability of Hensen's node to induce neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. We show that Hensen's node induces large amounts of neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. Neural induction proceeds in the absence of mesodermal differentiation and is accompanied by tissue movements which may reflect notoplate induction. The competence of the ectoderm to respond to Hensen's node extends much later in development than that to activin-A or to induction by vegetal cells, and parallels the extended competence to neural induction by axial mesoderm. The actions of activin-A and Hensen's node are further distinguished by their effects on lithium-treated ectoderm. These results suggest that neural induction can occur efficiently in response to inducing signals from organizer tissue arrested at a stage prior to gastrulation, and that such early interactions in the blastula may be an important component of neural induction in vertebrate embryos.     

Surface ectoderm is necessary for the morphogenesis of somites

The paraxial mesoderm of the neck and trunk of mouse embryos undergoes extensive morphogenesis in forming somites. Paraxial mesoderm is divided into segments, it elongates along its anterior posterior axis, and its cells organize into epithelia. Experiments were performed to determine if these processes are autonomous to the mesoderm that gives rise to the somites. Presomitic mesoderm at the tailbud stage was cultured in the presence and absence of its adjacent tissues. Somite segmentation occurred in the absence of neural tube, notochord, gut and surface ectoderm, and occurred in posterior fragments in the absence of anterior presomitic mesoderm. Mesodermal expression of Dll1 and Notch1, genes with roles in segmentation, was largely independent of other tissues, consistent with autonomous segmentation. However, surface ectoderm was found to be necessary for elongation of the mesoderm along the anterior-posterior axis and for somite epithelialization. To determine if there is specificity in the interaction between ectoderm and mesoderm, ectoderm from different sources was recombined with presomitic mesoderm. Surface ectoderm from only certain parts of the embryo supported somite epithelialization and elongation. Somite epithelialization induced by ectoderm was correlated with expression of the basic-helix-loop-helix gene Paraxis in the mesoderm. This is consistent with the genetically defined requirement for Paraxis in somite epithelialization. However, trunk ectoderm was able to induce somite epithelialization in the absence of strong Paraxis expression. We conclude that somitogenesis consists of autonomous segmentation patterned by Notch signaling and nonautonomous induction of elongation and epithelialization by surface ectoderm.     

Activities of Mesoderm-Inducing Factors Secreted by Mammalian Cells in Culture1

We have examined the activities of several mesoderm-inducing factors contained in the culture fluids of phorbol ester (4beta-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;PMA)-stimulated human cell lines. Mesoderm induction was assayed by examining the differentiation of mesoderm tissues reacted with presumptive ectoderm of the Cynops blastula. The assay system also examined erythroid differentiation activity (EDF activity) in order to test the relationship between mesoderm induction and activin A (EDF). Of 22 human cell lines examined, six strains were positive for both mesoderm-inducing activity and EDF activity. Four strains showed only mesoderm inducing activity, and one showed only EDF activity. The remaining 11 strains showed neither activity. Therefore, most cell lines secreting mesoderm-inducing activity also possessed EDF activity. Furthermore, culture fluid of a strain (K-562) that exhibited both types of activities, was partially fractionated by DEAE-Toyopearl column chromatography and examined in the same way. The fractions that showed the highest amount of EDF activity were coincident with those displaying mesoderm-inducing activity. These results suggest that a number of PMA-stimulated mammalian cell lines have the ability to secrete mesoderm-inducing factors which are similar to activin A (EDF).     

Pattern formation in a pentameral animal: induction of early adult rudiment development in sea urchins

We investigated adult rudiment induction in the direct-developing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma microsurgically. After removal of the archenteron (which includes presumptive coelomic mesoderm as well as presumptive endoderm) from late gastrulae, larval ectoderm develops properly but obvious rudiments (tube feet, nervous system, and adult skeleton) fail to form, indicating that coelomic mesoderm, endoderm, or both are required for induction of adult development. Recombination of ectoderm and archenteron rescues development. Implanted endoderm alone or left coelom alone each regenerate the full complement of archenteron derivatives; thus, they are uninformative as to the relative inductive potential of the two regions. However, in isolated ectoderm, more limited regeneration gives rise to larvae containing no archenteron derivatives at all, endoderm only, or both endoderm and left coelom. Adult nervous system begins to develop only in the latter, indicating that left coelom is required for the inductive signal. Isolated ectoderm develops a vestibule (the precursor of adult ectoderm) and correctly regulates vestibular expression of the ectodermal territory marker HeET-1, indicating that the early phase of vestibule development occurs autonomously; only later development requires the inductive signal. Another ectodermal marker, HeARS, is regulated properly in the larval ectoderm region, but not in the vestibule. HeARS regulation thus represents an early response to the inducing signal. We compare HeARS expression in H. erythrogramma with that in indirect developers and discuss its implications for modularity in the evolution of developmental mode.     

Evidence that the limb bud ectoderm is required for survival of the underlying mesoderm

The limb forms from a bud of mesoderm encased in a hull of ectoderm that grows out from the flank of the embryo. Coordinated signaling between the limb mesoderm and ectoderm is critical for normal limb outgrowth and patterning. The apical ectodermal ridge (AER), found at the distal tip, is a rich source of signaling molecules and has been proposed to specify distal structures and maintain the survival of cells in the underlying distal mesoderm. The dorsal and ventral non-AER ectoderm is also a source of signaling molecules and is important for dorsal–ventral patterning of the limb bud. Here we determine if this ectoderm provides cell survival signals by surgically removing the dorsal or ventral ectoderm during early chicken limb bud development and assaying for programmed cell death. We find that, similar to the AER, removal of the dorsal or ventral non-AER ectoderm results in massive cell death in the underlying mesoderm. In addition, although a re-epithelialization occurs, we find perturbations in the timing of Shh expression and, for the case of the dorsal ectoderm removal, defects in soft tissue and skeletal development along the proximal–distal axis. Furthermore, ectoderm substitution experiments show that the survival signal produced by the dorsal limb ectoderm is specific. Thus, our results argue that the non-AER ectoderm, like the AER, provides a specific survival signal to the underlying mesoderm that is necessary for normal limb development and conclusions drawn from experiments in which the non-AER ectoderm is removed, need to take into consideration this observation.