The histone methyltransferase SUV420H2 and Heterochromatin Proteins HP1 interact but show different dynamic behaviours

Background  

Histone lysine methylation plays a fundamental role in chromatin organization and marks distinct chromatin regions. In particular, trimethylation at lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9) and at lysine 20 of histone H4 (H4K20) governed by the histone methyltransferases SUV39H1/2 and SUV420H1/2 respectively, have emerged as a hallmark of pericentric heterochromatin. Controlled chromatin organization is crucial for gene expression regulation and genome stability. Therefore, it is essential to analyze mechanisms responsible for high order chromatin packing and in particular the interplay between enzymes involved in histone modifications, such as histone methyltransferases and proteins that recognize these epigenetic marks.     

PR-SET7 and SUV4-20H regulate H4 lysine-20 methylation at imprinting control regions in the mouse

Imprinted genes are important in development and their allelic expression is mediated by imprinting control regions (ICRs). On their DNA-methylated allele, ICRs are marked by trimethylation at H3 Lys 9 (H3K9me3) and H4 Lys 20 (H4K20me3), similar to pericentric heterochromatin. Here, we investigate which histone methyltransferases control this methylation of histone at ICRs. We found that inactivation of SUV4-20H leads to the loss of H4K20me3 and increased levels of its substrate, H4K20me1. H4K20me1 is controlled by PR-SET7 and is detected on both parental alleles. The disruption of SUV4-20H or PR-SET7 does not affect methylation of DNA at ICRs but influences precipitation of H3K9me3, which is suggestive of a trans-histone change. Unlike at pericentric heterochromatin, however, H3K9me3 at ICRs does not depend on SUV39H. Our data show not only new similarities but also differences between ICRs and heterochromatin, both of which show constitutive maintenance of methylation of DNA in somatic cells.     

Somatic Cancer Mutations in the SUV420H1 Protein Lysine Methyltransferase Modulate Its Catalytic Activity

SUV420H1 is a protein lysine methyltransferase that introduces di- and trimethylation of H4K20 and is frequently mutated in human cancers. We investigated the functional effects of eight somatic cancer mutations on SUV420H1 activity in vitro and in cells. One group of mutations (S255F, K258E, A269V) caused a reduction of the catalytic activity on peptide and nucleosome substrates. The mutated amino acids have putative roles in AdoMet binding and recognition of H4 residue D24. Group 2 mutations (E238V, D249N, E320K) caused a reduction of activity on peptide substrates, which was partially recovered when using nucleosomal substrates. The corresponding residues could have direct or indirect roles in peptide and AdoMet binding, but the effects of the mutations can be overcome by additional interactions between SUV420H1 and the nucleosome substrate. The third group of mutations (S283L, S304Y) showed enhanced activity with peptide substrates when compared with nucleosomal substrates, suggesting that these residues are involved in nucleosomal interaction or allosteric activation of SUV420H1 after nucleosome binding. Group 2 and 3 mutants highlight the role of nucleosomal contacts for SUV420H1 regulation in agreement with the high activity of this enzyme on nucleosomal substrates. Strikingly, seven of the somatic cancer mutations studied here led to a reduction of the catalytic activity of SUV420H1 in cells, suggesting that SUV420H1 activity might have a tumor suppressive function. This could be explained by the role of H4K20me2/3 in DNA repair, suggesting that loss or reduction of SUV420H1 activity could contribute to a mutator phenotype in cancer cells.     

KDM5B focuses H3K4 methylation near promoters and enhancers during embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation

Background

Pluripotency of embryonic stem (ES) cells is controlled in part by chromatin-modifying factors that regulate histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation. However, it remains unclear how H3K4 demethylation contributes to ES cell function.

Results

Here, we show that KDM5B, which demethylates lysine 4 of histone H3, co-localizes with H3K4me3 near promoters and enhancers of active genes in ES cells; its depletion leads to spreading of H3K4 methylation into gene bodies and enhancer shores, indicating that KDM5B functions to focus H3K4 methylation at promoters and enhancers. Spreading of H3K4 methylation to gene bodies and enhancer shores is linked to defects in gene expression programs and enhancer activity, respectively, during self-renewal and differentiation of KDM5B-depleted ES cells. KDM5B critically regulates H3K4 methylation at bivalent genes during differentiation in the absence of LIF or Oct4. We also show that KDM5B and LSD1, another H3K4 demethylase, co-regulate H3K4 methylation at active promoters but they retain distinct roles in demethylating gene body regions and bivalent genes.

Conclusions

Our results provide global and functional insight into the role of KDM5B in regulating H3K4 methylation marks near promoters, gene bodies, and enhancers in ES cells and during differentiation.     

Ring-like distribution of constitutive heterochromatin in bovine senescent cells

Background

Cells that reach “Hayflick limit” of proliferation, known as senescent cells, possess a particular type of nuclear architecture. Human senescent cells are characterized by the presence of highly condensed senescent associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF) that can be detected both by immunostaining for histone H3 three-methylated at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) and by DAPI counterstaining.

Methods

We have studied nuclear architecture in bovine senescent cells using a combination of immunofluorescence and 3D fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH).

Results

Analysis of heterochromatin distribution in bovine senescent cells using fluorescent in situ hybridization for pericentric chromosomal regions, immunostaining of H3K9me3, centromeric proteins CENP A/B and DNA methylation showed a lower level of heterochromatin condensation as compared to young cells. No SAHF foci were observed. Instead, we observed fibrous ring-like or ribbon-like heterochromatin patterns that were undetectable with DAPI counterstaining. These heterochromatin fibers were associated with nucleoli.

Conclusions

Constitutive heterochromatin in bovine senescent cells is organized in ring-like structures.     

Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 impairs methylation of histone H3 lysine 9: Regulation of lysine methyltransferases by physical interaction with their substrates

Chromatin is broadly compartmentalized in two defined states: euchromatin and heterochromatin. Generally, euchromatin is trimethylated on histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4^me3) while heterochromatin contains the H3K9^me3 mark. The H3K9^me3 modification is added by lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) such as SETDB1. Herein, we show that SETDB1 interacts with its substrate H3, but only in the absence of the euchromatic mark H3K4^me3. In addition, we show that SETDB1 fails to methylate substrates containing the H3K4^me3 mark. Likewise, the functionally related H3K9 KMTs G9A, GLP and SUV39H1 also fail to bind and to methylate H3K4^me3 substrates. Accordingly, we provide in vivo evidence that H3K9^me2-enriched histones are devoid of H3K4^me2/3 and that histones depleted of H3K4^me2/3 have elevated H3K9^me2/3. The correlation between the loss of interaction of these KMTs with H3K4^me3 and concomitant methylation impairment leads to the postulate that at least these four KMTs require stable interaction with their respective substrates for optimal activity. Thus, novel substrates could be discovered via the identification of KMT interacting proteins. Indeed, we find that SETDB1 binds to and methylates a novel substrate, the inhibitor of growth protein ING2, while SUV39H1 binds to and methylates the heterochromatin protein HP1α. Thus, our observations suggest a mechanism of post-translational regulation of lysine methylation and propose a potential mechanism for the segregation of the biologically opposing marks, H3K4^me3 and H3K9^me3. Furthermore, the correlation between H3-KMTs interaction and substrate methylation highlights that the identification of novel KMT substrates may be facilitated by the identification of interaction partners.Key words: histone methylation, lysine methyltransferase, H3K4^me3, H3K9^me3, SETDB1, G9A, ING2     

Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 impairs methylation of histone H3 lysine 9

Chromatin is broadly compartmentalized in two defined states: euchromatin and heterochromatin. Generally, euchromatin is trimethylated on histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4^me3) while heterochromatin contains the H3K9^me3 marks. The H3K9^me3 modification is added by lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) such as SETDB1. Herein, we show that SETDB1 interacts with its substrate H3, but only in the absence of the euchromatic mark H3K4^me3. In addition, we show that SETDB1 fails to methylate substrates containing the H3K4^me3 mark. Likewise, the functionally related H3K9 KMTs G9A, GLP, and SUV39H1 also fail to bind and to methylate H3K4^me3 substrates. Accordingly, we provide in vivo evidence that H3K9^me2-enriched histones are devoid of H3K4^me2/3 and that histones depleted of H3K4^me2/3 have elevated H3K9^me2/3. The correlation between the loss of interaction of these KMTs with H3K4^me3 and concomitant methylation impairment leads to the postulate that, at least these four KMTs, require stable interaction with their respective substrates for optimal activity. Thus, novel substrates could be discovered via the identification of KMT interacting proteins. Indeed, we find that SETDB1 binds to and methylates a novel substrate, the inhibitor of growth protein ING2, while SUV39H1 binds to and methylates the heterochromatin protein HP1α. Thus, our observations suggest a mechanism of post-translational regulation of lysine methylation and propose a potential mechanism for the segregation of the biologically opposing marks, H3K4^me3 and H3K9^me3. Furthermore, the correlation between H3-KMTs interaction and substrate methylation highlights that the identification of novel KMT substrates may be facilitated by the identification of interaction partners.     

Chromocentre integrity and epigenetic marks

The epigenetic modification of histones dictates the formation of euchromatin and heterochromatin domains. We studied the effects of a deficiency of histone methyltransferase, SUV39h, and trichostatin A-dependent hyperacetylation on the structural stability of centromeric clusters, called chromocentres. We did not observe the expected disintegration of chromocentres, but both SUV39h deficiency and hyperacetylation in SUV39h+/+ cells induced the re-positioning of chromocentres closer to the nuclear periphery. Conversely, TSA treatment of SUV39h?/? cells re-established normal nuclear radial positioning of chromocentres. This structural re-arrangement was likely caused by several epigenetic events at centromeric heterochromatin. In particular, reciprocal exchanges between H3K9me1, H3K9me2, H3K9me3, DNA methylation, and HP1 protein levels influenced chromocentre nuclear composition. For example, H3K9me1 likely substituted for the function of H3K9me3 in chromocentre nuclear arrangement and compaction. Our results illustrate the important and interchangeable roles of epigenetic marks for chromocentre integrity. Therefore, we propose a model for epigenetic regulation of nuclear stability of centromeric heterochromatin in the mouse genome.     

SUV39H2 epigenetic silencing controls fate conversion of epidermal stem and progenitor cells

Epigenetic histone trimethylation on lysine 9 (H3K9me3) represents a major molecular signal for genome stability and gene silencing conserved from worms to man. However, the functional role of the H3K9 trimethylases SUV39H1/2 in mammalian tissue homeostasis remains largely unknown. Here, we use a spontaneous dog model with monogenic inheritance of a recessive SUV39H2 loss-of-function variant and impaired differentiation in the epidermis, a self-renewing tissue fueled by stem and progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. Our results demonstrate that SUV39H2 maintains the stem and progenitor cell pool by restricting fate conversion through H3K9me3 repressive marks on gene promoters encoding components of the Wnt/p63/adhesion axis. When SUV39H2 function is lost, repression is relieved, and enhanced Wnt activity causes progenitor cells to prematurely exit the cell cycle, a process mimicked by pharmacological Wnt activation in primary canine, human, and mouse keratinocytes. As a consequence, the stem cell growth potential of cultured SUV39H2-deficient canine keratinocytes is exhausted while epidermal differentiation and genome stability are compromised. Collectively, our data identify SUV39H2 and potentially also SUV39H1 as major gatekeepers in the delicate balance of progenitor fate conversion through H3K9me3 rate-limiting road blocks in basal layer keratinocytes.     

M33 condenses chromatin through nuclear body formation and methylation of both histone H3 lysine 9 and lysine 27

Heterochromatin, a type of condensed DNA in eukaryotic cells, has two main categories: Constitutive heterochromatin, which contains H3K9 methylation, and facultative heterochromatin, which contains H3K27 methylation. Methylated H3K9 and H3K27 serve as docking sites for chromodomain-containing proteins that compact chromatin. M33 (also known as CBX2) is a chromodomain-containing protein that binds H3K27me3 and compacts chromatin in vitro. However, whether M33 mediates chromatin compaction in cellulo remains unknown. Here we show that M33 compacts chromatin into DAPI-intense heterochromatin domains in cells. The formation of these heterochromatin domains requires H3K27me3, which recruits M33 to form nuclear bodies. G9a and SUV39H1 are sequentially recruited into M33 nuclear bodies to create H3K9 methylated chromatin in a process that is independent of HP1α. Finally, M33 decreases progerin-induced nuclear envelope disruption caused by loss of heterochromatin. Our findings demonstrate that M33 mediates the formation of condensed chromatin by forming nuclear bodies containing both H3K27me3 and H3K9me3. Our model of M33-dependent chromatin condensation suggests H3K27 methylation corroborates with H3K9 methylation during the formation of facultative heterochromatin and provides the theoretical basis for developing novel therapies to treat heterochromatin-related diseases.     

Molecular recognition of H3/H4 histone tails by the tudor domains of JMJD2A: a comparative molecular dynamics simulations study

Background

Histone demethylase, JMJD2A, specifically recognizes and binds to methylated lysine residues at histone H3 and H4 tails (especially trimethylated H3K4 (H3K4me3), trimethylated H3K9 (H3K9me3) and di,trimethylated H4K20 (H4K20me2, H4K20me3)) via its tandem tudor domains. Crystal structures of JMJD2A-tudor binding to H3K4me3 and H4K20me3 peptides are available whereas the others are not. Complete picture of the recognition of the four histone peptides by the tandem tudor domains yet remains to be clarified.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We report a detailed molecular dynamics simulation and binding energy analysis of the recognition of JMJD2A-tudor with four different histone tails. 25 ns fully unrestrained molecular dynamics simulations are carried out for each of the bound and free structures. We investigate the important hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions between the tudor domains and the peptide molecules and identify the critical residues that stabilize the complexes. Our binding free energy calculations show that H4K20me2 and H3K9me3 peptides have the highest and lowest affinity to JMJD2A-tudor, respectively. We also show that H4K20me2 peptide adopts the same binding mode with H4K20me3 peptide, and H3K9me3 peptide adopts the same binding mode with H3K4me3 peptide. Decomposition of the enthalpic and the entropic contributions to the binding free energies indicate that the recognition of the histone peptides is mainly driven by favourable van der Waals interactions. Residue decomposition of the binding free energies with backbone and side chain contributions as well as their energetic constituents identify the hotspots in the binding interface of the structures.

Conclusion

Energetic investigations of the four complexes suggest that many of the residues involved in the interactions are common. However, we found two receptor residues that were related to selective binding of the H3 and H4 ligands. Modifications or mutations on one of these residues can selectively alter the recognition of the H3 tails or the H4 tails.     

Histone H4K20 tri‐methylation at late‐firing origins ensures timely heterochromatin replication

Among other targets, the protein lysine methyltransferase PR‐Set7 induces histone H4 lysine 20 monomethylation (H4K20me1), which is the substrate for further methylation by the Suv4‐20h methyltransferase. Although these enzymes have been implicated in control of replication origins, the specific contribution of H4K20 methylation to DNA replication remains unclear. Here, we show that H4K20 mutation in mammalian cells, unlike in Drosophila, partially impairs S‐phase progression and protects from DNA re‐replication induced by stabilization of PR‐Set7. Using Epstein–Barr virus‐derived episomes, we further demonstrate that conversion of H4K20me1 to higher H4K20me2/3 states by Suv4‐20h is not sufficient to define an efficient origin per se, but rather serves as an enhancer for MCM2‐7 helicase loading and replication activation at defined origins. Consistent with this, we find that Suv4‐20h‐mediated H4K20 tri‐methylation (H4K20me3) is required to sustain the licensing and activity of a subset of ORCA/LRWD1‐associated origins, which ensure proper replication timing of late‐replicating heterochromatin domains. Altogether, these results reveal Suv4‐20h‐mediated H4K20 tri‐methylation as a critical determinant in the selection of active replication initiation sites in heterochromatin regions of mammalian genomes.     

Dynamic distribution of histone H4 arginine 3 methylation marks in the developing murine cortex

Background

Epigenetic modifications regulate key transitions in cell fate during development of the central nervous system (CNS). During cortical development the initial population of proliferative neuroepithelial precursor cells give rise to neurons and then glia in a strict temporal order. Neurogenesis and gliogenesis are accompanied by a switch from symmetric to asymmetric divisions of the neural precursor cells generating another precursor and a differentiated progeny. To investigate whether specific post-translational histone modifications define specific stages of neural precursor differentiation during cortical development I focussed on the appearance of two different types of histone arginine methylation, the dimethyl symmetric H4R3 (H4R3me2s) and dimethyl asymmetric H4R3 (H4R3me2a) in the developing mouse cortex.

Methodology/Principal Findings

An immunohistochemical study of the developing cortex at different developmental stages was performed to detect the distribution of H4R3me2s and H4R3me2a modifications. I analysed the distribution of these modifications in: 1) undifferentiated neural precursors, 2) post-mitotic neurons and 3) developing oligodendrocyte precursors (OLPs) using lineage-specific and histone modification-specific antibodies to co-label the cells. I found that the proliferative neuroepithelium during the stage of mainly symmetric expansive divisions is characterised by the prevalence of H4R3me2s modification and almost no detectable H4R3me2a modification. However, at a later stage, when the cortical layers with post-mitotic neurons have begun forming, both H4R3me2a and H4R3me2s modifications are detected in the post-mitotic neurons and in the developing OLPs.

Conclusions/Significance

I propose that the H4R3me2s modification forms part of the “histone code” of undifferentiated neural precursors. The later appearance of the H4R3me2a modifications specifies the onset of neurogenesis and gliogenesis and the commitment of the NSCs to differentiate. Thus, the sequential appearance of the two different H4R3 methylation marks may define a particular cellular state of the NSCs during their development and differentiation demonstrating the role of histone arginine methylation in cortical development.