基质金属蛋白酶-2和p185HER-2/neu蛋白在卵巢癌中的研究进展

基质金属蛋白酶-2(Matrix Metalloproteinase-2,MMP-2)是基质金属蛋白酶家族的重要成员,能降解明胶蛋白和Ⅳ型、V型胶原,在细胞外基质的降解过程中起着关键作用,能够促进肿瘤细胞发生侵袭和转移。p185HER-2/neu蛋白是一种相对分子质量185×103的跨膜糖蛋白,由HER-2/neu基因编码,属于酪氨酸激酶受体家族,p185HER-2/neu蛋白在人类多种癌症中存在扩增及过量表达,并与肿瘤的侵袭性表型及生存期短密切相关。就基质金属蛋白酶-2和p185HER-2/neu蛋白的生物学特性,与卵巢癌侵袭转移和预后的关系及MMP-2和p185HER-2/neu蛋白的研究情况等予以综述。     

基质金属蛋白酶及其组织抑制剂研究进展

基质金属蛋白酶家族是细胞外基质降解过程中的重要酶类,组织金属蛋白酶抑制剂是基质金属蛋白酶的天然抑制物。研究证实,细胞外基质中基质金属蛋白酶及其组织抑制剂的失衡与多种病理机制有关,尤其与肿瘤的侵袭和转移密切相关。本就基质金属蛋白酶及其组织抑制剂的性质、结构以及功能进行了综述。     

新型金属蛋白酶ADAMTS家族的研究进展

含Ⅰ型血小板结合蛋白基序的解聚蛋白样金属蛋白酶ADAMTSs(a disintegrin and metallo-proteinase with thrombospondin motifs)是一类新的Zn2 依赖的金属蛋白酶家族,广泛存在于哺乳动物和无脊椎动物体内.从1997年发现第一个ADAMTSs家族成员以来,迄今共有19个成员被发现,在保持凝血系统的稳态、器官生成、炎症、生育等方面有重要作用.尽管其中大部分酶的功能尚不清楚,但已有研究显示该家族成员与多种疾病密切相关.ADAMTSs与基质金属蛋白酶MMPs、解聚蛋白样金属蛋白酶ADAMs同属金属蛋白酶家族,但在结构组成、组织细胞分布、底物作用的特异性、酶活性的调节等方面有明显差别.本文综述了其在结构功能及与疾病关系的研究进展.     

基质金属蛋白酶与脑血管急性损伤

基质金属蛋白酶是一组金属依赖性的蛋白内切酶家族,可对细胞外基质进行特异的降解,在生理和璃理过程中都发挥着重要作用。已有许多有关基质金属蛋白酶在中枢神经系统的作用的研究报道,本文对基质金属蛋白酶在脑缺血和脑出血等脑血管的急性损伤作用进行了综述,并对进一步研究方向作出展望。     

基质金属蛋白酶-9与动脉粥样硬化

基质金属蛋白酶-9（matrix metalloproteinase 9,MMP-9）是基质金属蛋白酶家族中的一种,通过降解胞外基质．在动脉粥样硬化的血管重构、斑块不稳定所导致的心血管病的发展过程中发挥着重要的作用。     

窖蛋白-1、基质金属蛋白酶-2与乳腺肿瘤的侵袭和转移

窖蛋白(caveolin)是分子量为21～24 kD的整合膜蛋白,是胞膜窖(caveolae)的标志性结构分子,其家族成员窖蛋白-1(caveolin-1,Cav-1)参与细胞内许多重要的生命活动.近来研究发现,窖蛋白-1与乳腺上皮细胞转化及乳腺癌的发生密切相关.基质金属蛋白酶(matrix metalloproteinases,MMPs)是基质降解代谢的主要酶类,几乎能降解细胞外基质和基底膜的所有成分,其家族成员明胶酶A(MMP-2)在乳腺癌的浸润和转移过程中起重要作用.新近发现,窖蛋白-1与基质金属蛋白酶-2在胞膜窖中共定位,窖蛋白-1通过抑制基质金属蛋白酶-2的激活来抑制乳腺癌的侵袭和转移,起到肿瘤抑制因子的作用.本文对窖蛋白-1与基质金属蛋白酶-2各自在乳腺肿瘤侵袭转移中的作用及两者关系的研究进行综述.     

运动负荷对骨基质有机成分的影响及其可能机制

骨基质的有机成分主要为骨Ⅰ型胶原基质金属蛋白酶,该酶是细胞外基质降解的重要酶类;基质金属蛋白酶抑制因子则是基质金属蛋白酶活性的抑制剂,它们均为骨代谢过程中的重要标志性物质。本文通过查阅文献资料,对生理、部分病理状态及运动干预条件下,骨基质的Ⅰ型胶原和基质金属蛋白酶及其抑制因子的变化情况进行综述,并对其变化的机制予以阐释。     

TIMP-3表达下调促进前脂肪细胞分化

细胞与细胞外基质的相互作用以及细胞外基质的重构在脂肪组织的形成过程中发挥了重要作用。细胞外基质的这一系列变化是由细胞分泌的蛋白酶及其抑制物调控的,其中基质金属蛋白酶(MMPs)是一类调控细胞外基质分解的蛋白酶家族。MMPs的活性受其四种组织抑制物调节,即TIMP1-4。以前对TIMP在脂     

原位杂交检测组织金属蛋白酶抑制因子-1mRNA在IgA肾病肾脏中的表达

为探讨组织蛋白酶抑制因子在 Ig A肾病肾小球硬化中的作用 ,本文用原位杂交法研究组织金属蛋白酶抑制因子 -1(TIMP- 1) m RNA在 3种类型 Ig A肾病 (轻度系膜增生型、中度系膜增生型及局灶型 )肾组织中的表达。结果表明 :TIMP-1m RNA原位杂交的阳性信号主要分布于部分肾小管上皮细胞内。在肾小球系膜细胞也可检测到 TIMP- 1m RNA阳性信号 ,但较肾小管弱。中度系膜增生型的 TIMP- 1m RNA阳性信号明显地较其他两型 Ig A肾病为强。以上结果表明 :由肾小管上皮细胞及系膜细胞合成的 TIMP- 1通过抑制基质金属蛋白酶的活性 ,可导致细胞外基质 (ECM)在肾小管间质及肾小球内过度沉积 ,从而对肾小球硬化有促进作用。     

基质金属蛋白酶-9 与全身炎症反应综合征研究进展

全身炎症反应综合征是引发多器官功能障碍综合征的主要原因,而其发生的关键环节是血管内皮细胞的损伤。内皮细胞外基质是内皮细胞生存的依托,其主要成分为IV型胶原。基质金属蛋白酶-9可以降解IV型胶原,破坏内皮细胞外基膜。本文综述了基质金属蛋白酶-9与全身炎症反应的关系。     

DEC1 and MIC-1

Comment on: Qian Y, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:11300-5.     

LINE-1编码蛋白L1-ORF1的原核表达纯化和多克隆抗体制备

目的: 制备具有肿瘤组织特异性表达的L1-ORF1蛋白多克隆抗体并进行初步应用研究。方法:采取基因工程表达方法制备L1-ORF1蛋白,免疫家兔制备多克隆抗体,间接ELISA检测抗体效价,Western blot和细胞免疫荧光方法检测抗体特异性,免疫检测验证其识别肿瘤细胞内L1-ORF1蛋白的特异性。结果:制备的抗L1-ORF1蛋白多克隆抗体具有很高的敏感性与特异性,免疫学检测表明该抗体不仅能检测出正常细胞中瞬时表达的L1-ORF1蛋白,而且可检测出肿瘤细胞中天然表达的L1-ORF1蛋白。结论:制备的多克隆抗体具有较高的敏感性与特异性,为以后该抗体的进一步应用奠定了基础。     

Role of the ASK1-SEK1-JNK1-HIPK1 signal in Daxx trafficking and ASK1 oligomerization

Overexpression of JNK binding domain inhibited glucose deprivation-induced JNK1 activation, relocalization of Daxx from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) oligomerization in human prostate adenocarcinoma DU-145 cells. However, SB203580, a p38 inhibitor, did not prevent relocalization of Daxx and oligomerization of ASK1 during glucose deprivation. Studies from in vivo labeling and immune complex kinase assay demonstrated that phosphorylation of Daxx occurred during glucose deprivation, and its phosphorylation was mediated through the ASK1-SEK1-JNK1-HIPK1 signal transduction pathway. Data from immunofluorescence staining and protein interaction assay suggest that phosphorylated Daxx may be translocated to the cytoplasm, bind to ASK1, and subsequently lead to ASK1 oligomerization. Mutation of Daxx Ser667 to Ala results in suppression of Daxx relocalization during glucose deprivation, suggesting that Ser667 residue plays an important role in the relocalization of Daxx. Unlike wild-type Daxx, a Daxx deletion mutant (amino acids 501-625) mainly localized to the cytoplasm, where it associated with ASK1, activated JNK1, and induced ASK1 oligomerization without glucose deprivation. Taken together, these results show that glucose deprivation activates the ASK1-SEK1-JNK1-HIPK1 pathway, and the activated HIPK1 is probably involved in the relocalization of Daxx from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. The relocalized Daxx may play an important role in glucose deprivation-induced ASK1 oligomerization.     

Regulation of PCTAIRE1 protein stability by AKT1, LKB1 and BRCA1

PCTAIRE1, also known as CDK16, is a cyclin-dependent kinase that is regulated by cyclin Y. It is a member of the serine-threonine family of kinases and its functions have primarily been implicated in cellular processes like vesicular transport, neuronal growth and development, myogenesis, spermatogenesis and cell proliferation. However, as extensive studies on PCTAIRE1 have not yet been conducted, the signaling pathways for this kinase involved in governing many cellular processes are yet to be elucidated in detail. Here, we report the association of PCTAIRE1 with important cellular proteins involved in major cell signaling pathways, especially cell proliferation. In particular, here we show that PCTAIRE1 interacts with AKT1, a key player of the PI3K signaling pathway that is responsible for promoting cell survival and proliferation. Our studies show that PCTAIRE1 is a substrate of AKT1 that gets stabilized by it. Further, we show that PCTAIRE1 also interacts with and is degraded by LKB1, a kinase that is known to suppress cellular proliferation and also regulate cellular energy metabolism. Moreover, our results show that PCTAIRE1 is also degraded by BRCA1, a well-known tumor suppressor. Together, our studies highlight the regulation of PCTAIRE1 by key players of the major cell signaling pathways involved in regulating cell proliferation, and therefore, provide crucial links that could be explored further to elucidate the mechanistic role of PCTAIRE1 in cell proliferation and tumorigenesis.     

Antagonism between Cry1Ac1 and Cyt1A1 Toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis

Most strains of the insecticidal bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis have a combination of different protoxins in their parasporal crystals. Some of the combinations clearly interact synergistically, like the toxins present in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. In this paper we describe a novel joint activity of toxins from different strains of B. thuringiensis. In vitro bioassays in which we used pure, trypsin-activated Cry1Ac1 proteins from B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki, Cyt1A1 from B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, and Trichoplusia ni BTI-Tn5B1-4 cells revealed contrasting susceptibility characteristics. The 50% lethal concentrations (LC₅₀s) were estimated to be 4,967 of Cry1Ac1 per ml of medium and 11.69 ng of Cyt1A1 per ml of medium. When mixtures of these toxins in different proportions were assayed, eight different LC₅₀s were obtained. All of these LC₅₀s were significantly higher than the expected LC₅₀s of the mixtures. In addition, a series of bioassays were performed with late first-instar larvae of the cabbage looper and pure Cry1Ac1 and Cyt1A1 crystals, as well as two different combinations of the two toxins. The estimated mean LC₅₀ of Cry1Ac1 was 2.46 ng/cm² of diet, while Cyt1A1 crystals exhibited no toxicity, even at very high concentrations. The estimated mean LC₅₀s of Cry1Ac1 crystals were 15.69 and 19.05 ng per cm² of diet when these crystals were mixed with 100 and 1,000 ng of Cyt1A1 crystals per cm² of diet, respectively. These results indicate that there is clear antagonism between the two toxins both in vitro and in vivo. Other joint-action analyses corroborated these results. Although this is the second report of antagonism between B. thuringiensis toxins, our evidence is the first evidence of antagonism between toxins from different subspecies of B. thuringiensis (B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis) detected both in vivo and in vitro. Some possible explanations for this relationship are discussed.     

Antagonism between Cry1Ac1 and Cyt1A1 toxins of bacillus thuringiensis

Most strains of the insecticidal bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis have a combination of different protoxins in their parasporal crystals. Some of the combinations clearly interact synergistically, like the toxins present in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. In this paper we describe a novel joint activity of toxins from different strains of B. thuringiensis. In vitro bioassays in which we used pure, trypsin-activated Cry1Ac1 proteins from B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki, Cyt1A1 from B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, and Trichoplusia ni BTI-Tn5B1-4 cells revealed contrasting susceptibility characteristics. The 50% lethal concentrations (LC50s) were estimated to be 4,967 of Cry1Ac1 per ml of medium and 11.69 ng of Cyt1A1 per ml of medium. When mixtures of these toxins in different proportions were assayed, eight different LC50s were obtained. All of these LC50s were significantly higher than the expected LC50s of the mixtures. In addition, a series of bioassays were performed with late first-instar larvae of the cabbage looper and pure Cry1Ac1 and Cyt1A1 crystals, as well as two different combinations of the two toxins. The estimated mean LC50 of Cry1Ac1 was 2.46 ng/cm2 of diet, while Cyt1A1 crystals exhibited no toxicity, even at very high concentrations. The estimated mean LC50s of Cry1Ac1 crystals were 15.69 and 19.05 ng per cm2 of diet when these crystals were mixed with 100 and 1,000 ng of Cyt1A1 crystals per cm2 of diet, respectively. These results indicate that there is clear antagonism between the two toxins both in vitro and in vivo. Other joint-action analyses corroborated these results. Although this is the second report of antagonism between B. thuringiensis toxins, our evidence is the first evidence of antagonism between toxins from different subspecies of B. thuringiensis (B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis) detected both in vivo and in vitro. Some possible explanations for this relationship are discussed.     

Generation of 'humanized' hCYP1A1_1A2_Cyp1a1/1a2(-/-) mouse line

Human/rodent CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 orthologs are well known to exhibit species-specific differences in substrate preferences and rates of metabolism. This lab previously characterized a BAC-transgenic mouse carrying the human CYP1A1_CYP1A2 locus; in this line, human dioxin-inducible CYP1A1 and basal vs dioxin-inducible CYP1A2 have been shown to be expressed normally (with regard to mRNAs, proteins and three enzyme activities) in every one of nine mouse tissues studied. The mouse Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 genes are oriented head-to-head and share a bidirectional promoter region of 13,954 bp. Using Cre recombinase and loxP sites inserted 3' of the stop codons of both genes, we show here a successful interchromosomal excision of 26,173 bp that ablated both genes on the same allele. The Cyp1a1/1a2(-) double-knockout allele was bred with the "humanized" line; the final product is the hCYP1A1_1A2_Cyp1a1/1a2(-/-) line on a theoretically >99.8% C57BL/6J genetic background-having both human genes replacing the mouse orthologs. This line will be valuable for human risk assessment studies involving any environmental toxicant or drug that is a substrate for CYP1A1 or CYP1A2.     

Dial 9-1-1 for DNA damage: the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp complex

Genotoxic stress activates checkpoint signaling pathways that block cell cycle progression, trigger apoptosis, and regulate DNA repair. Studies in yeast and humans have shown that Rad9, Hus1, Rad1, and Rad17 play key roles in checkpoint activation. Three of these proteins-Rad9, Hus1, and Rad1-interact in a heterotrimeric complex (dubbed the 9-1-1 complex), which resembles a PCNA-like sliding clamp, whereas Rad17 is part of a clamp-loading complex that is related to the PCNA clamp loader, replication factor-C (RFC). In response to genotoxic damage, the 9-1-1 complex is loaded around DNA by the Rad17-containing clamp loader. The DNA-bound 9-1-1 complex then facilitates ATR-mediated phosphorylation and activation of Chk1, a protein kinase that regulates S-phase progression, G2/M arrest, and replication fork stabilization. In addition to its role in checkpoint activation, accumulating evidence suggests that the 9-1-1 complex also participates in DNA repair. Taken together, these findings suggest that the 9-1-1 clamp is a multifunctional complex that is loaded onto DNA at sites of damage, where it coordinates checkpoint activation and DNA repair.