FRET and optical trapping reveal mechanisms of actin activation of the power stroke and phosphate release in myosin V

Myosins generate force and motion by precisely coordinating their mechanical and chemical cycles, but the nature and timing of this coordination remains controversial. We utilized a FRET approach to examine the kinetics of structural changes in the force-generating lever arm in myosin V. We directly compared the FRET results with single-molecule mechanical events examined by optical trapping. We introduced a mutation (S217A) in the conserved switch I region of the active site to examine how myosin couples structural changes in the actin- and nucleotide-binding regions with force generation. Specifically, S217A enhanced the maximum rate of lever arm priming (recovery stroke) while slowing ATP hydrolysis, demonstrating that it uncouples these two steps. We determined that the mutation dramatically slows both actin-induced rotation of the lever arm (power stroke) and phosphate release (≥10-fold), whereas our simulations suggest that the maximum rate of both steps is unchanged by the mutation. Time-resolved FRET revealed that the structure of the pre– and post–power stroke conformations and mole fractions of these conformations were not altered by the mutation. Optical trapping results demonstrated that S217A does not dramatically alter unitary displacements or slow the working stroke rate constant, consistent with the mutation disrupting an actin-induced conformational change prior to the power stroke. We propose that communication between the actin- and nucleotide-binding regions of myosin assures a proper actin-binding interface and active site have formed before producing a power stroke. Variability in this coupling is likely crucial for mediating motor-based functions such as muscle contraction and intracellular transport.     

The regulation of myosin II in Dictyostelium

Dictyostelium conventional myosin (myosin II) is an abundant protein that plays a role in various cellular processes such as cytokinesis, cell protrusion and development. This review will focus on the signal transduction pathways that regulate myosin II during cell movement. Myosin II appears to have two modes of action in Dictyostelium: local stabilization of the cytoskeleton by myosin filament association to the actin meshwork (structural mode) and force generation by contraction of actin filaments (motor mode). Some processes, such as cell movement under restrictive environment, require only the structural mode of myosin. However, cytokinesis in suspension and uropod retraction depend on motor activity as well. Myosin II can self-assemble into bipolar filaments. The formation of these filaments is negatively regulated by heavy chain phosphorylation through the action of a set of novel alpha kinases and is relatively well understood. However, only recently it has become clear that the formation of bipolar filaments and their translocation to the cortex are separate events. Translocation depends on filamentous actin, and is regulated by a cGMP pathway and possibly also by the cAMP phosphodiesterase RegA and the p21-activated kinase PAKa. Myosin motor activity is regulated by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain through myosin light chain kinase A. Unlike conventional light chain kinases, this enzyme is not regulated by calcium but is activated by cGMP-induced phosphorylation via an upstream kinase and subsequent autophosphorylation.     

Dictyostelium myosin II G680V suppressors exhibit overlapping spectra of biochemical phenotypes including facilitated phosphate release.

We have biochemically characterized 13 intragenic suppressors of the G680V mutation of Dictyostelium myosin II. In the absence of the G680V mutation, the suppressors result in a number of deviant behaviors, most commonly an increase in the basal (actin-independent) ATPase of the motor. This phenotype is complementary to that of the G680V mutant and supports our proposal that the latter impairs phosphate release. Different subsets of the mutants also suffer from poor ATPase enhancement by 1 mg/ml actin, failure to release from actin in the presence of ATPgammaS (or ADP and salt), and excessive release from actin in the presence of ADP. The patterns of suppressor behaviors suggest that, in general, they are facilitating P(i)-releasing state(s) of the motor, but that different individual suppressors may secondarily perturb other states or actions of the motor.     

Structural basis for actin assembly, activation of ATP hydrolysis, and delayed phosphate release

Assembled actin filaments support cellular signaling, intracellular trafficking, and cytokinesis. ATP hydrolysis triggered by actin assembly provides the structural cues for filament turnover in vivo. Here, we present the cryo-electron microscopic (cryo-EM) structure of filamentous actin (F-actin) in the presence of phosphate, with the visualization of some α-helical backbones and large side chains. A complete atomic model based on the EM map identified intermolecular interactions mediated by bound magnesium and phosphate ions. Comparison of the F-actin model with G-actin monomer crystal structures reveals a critical role for bending of the conserved proline-rich loop in triggering phosphate release following ATP hydrolysis. Crystal structures of G-actin show that mutations in this loop trap the catalytic site in two intermediate states of the ATPase cycle. The combined structural information allows us to propose a detailed molecular mechanism for the biochemical events, including actin polymerization and ATPase activation, critical for actin filament dynamics.     

Actin activation of myosin heavy chain kinase A in Dictyostelium: a biochemical mechanism for the spatial regulation of myosin II filament disassembly

Studies in Dictyostelium discoideum have established that the cycle of myosin II bipolar filament assembly and disassembly controls the temporal and spatial localization of myosin II during critical cellular processes, such as cytokinesis and cell locomotion. Myosin heavy chain kinase A (MHCK A) is a key enzyme regulating myosin II filament disassembly through myosin heavy chain phosphorylation in Dictyostelium. Under various cellular conditions, MHCK A is recruited to actin-rich cortical sites and is preferentially enriched at sites of pseudopod formation, and thus MHCK A is proposed to play a role in regulating localized disassembly of myosin II filaments in the cell. MHCK A possesses an aminoterminal coiled-coil domain that participates in the oligomerization, cellular localization, and actin binding activities of the kinase. In the current study, we show that the interaction between the coiled-coil domain of MHCK A and filamentous actin leads to an approximately 40-fold increase in the initial rate of kinase catalytic activity. Actin-mediated activation of MHCK A involves increased rates of kinase autophosphorylation and requires the presence of the coiled-coil domain. Structure-function analyses revealed that the coiled-coil domain alone binds to actin filaments (apparent K(D) = 0.9 microm) and thus mediates the direct interaction with F-actin required for MHCK A activation. Collectively, these results indicate that MHCK A recruitment to actin-rich sites could lead to localized activation of the kinase via direct interaction with actin filaments, and thus this mode of kinase regulation may represent an important mechanism by which the cell achieves localized disassembly of myosin II filaments required for specific changes in cell shape.     

Heterogeneity in the actin activation of myosin

The soluble proteolytic fragments of myosin, heavy meromyosin and subfragment 1, were prepared with varying amounts of the proteases chymotrypsin and papain, respectively. The actin-activated ATP hydrolysis were examined with oxygen-18-labeled ATP. Each preparation of heavy meromyosin and subfragments 1 displayed two pathways of ATP hydrolysis, called respectively the high and low oxygen exchange mechanisms. The contributions of the two mechanisms were found to be sensitive to the potassium chloride concentration. With a fixed concentration of actin (300 microM), the contribution of the low-exchange mechanism decreased from a maximum of 90% of the ATP hydrolysis at 10 and 20 mM KCl to 12% at 180 mM KCl. The results suggested that the two mechanisms were competing reactions catalyzed by a single species of myosin.     

Regulation of Dictyostelium myosin I and II

Dictyostelium expresses 12 different myosins, including seven single-headed myosins I and one conventional two-headed myosin II. In this review we focus on the signaling pathways that regulate Dictyostelium myosin I and myosin II. Activation of myosin I is catalyzed by a Cdc42/Rac-stimulated myosin I heavy chain kinase that is a member of the p21-activated kinase (PAK) family. Evidence that myosin I is linked to the Arp2/3 complex suggests that pathways that regulate myosin I may also influence actin filament assembly. Myosin II activity is stimulated by a cGMP-activated myosin light chain kinase and inhibited by myosin heavy chain kinases (MHCKs) that block bipolar filament assembly. Known MHCKs include MHCK A and MHCK B, which have a novel type of kinase catalytic domain joined to a WD repeat domain, and MHC-protein kinase C (PKC), which contains both diacylglycerol kinase and PKC-related protein kinase catalytic domains. A Dictyostelium PAK (PAKa) acts indirectly to promote myosin II filament formation, suggesting that the MHCKs may be indirectly regulated by Rac GTPases.     

Phosphorylation and actin activation of brain myosin

A method is described for obtaining brain myosin that shows significant actin activation, after phosphorylation with chicken gizzard myosin light chain kinase. Myosin with this activity could be obtained only via the initial purification of brain actomyosin. The latter complex, isolated by a method similar to that used for smooth muscle, contained actin, myosin, tropomyosin of the non-muscle type and another actin-binding protein of approximately 100,000 daltons. From the presence of a specific myosin light chain kinase and phosphatase in brain tissue it is suggested that the regulation of actin-myosin interaction operates via phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of myosin.     

The structural coupling between ATPase activation and recovery stroke in the myosin II motor

Before the myosin motor head can perform the next power stroke, it undergoes a large conformational transition in which the converter domain, bearing the lever arm, rotates approximately 65 degrees . Simultaneous with this "recovery stroke," myosin activates its ATPase function by closing the Switch-2 loop over the bound ATP. This coupling between the motions of the converter domain and of the 40 A-distant Switch-2 loop is essential to avoid unproductive ATP hydrolysis. The coupling mechanism is determined here by finding a series of optimized intermediates between crystallographic end structures of the recovery stroke (Dictyostelium discoideum), yielding movies of the transition at atomic detail. The successive formation of two hydrogen bonds by the Switch-2 loop is correlated with the successive see-saw motions of the relay and SH1 helices that hold the converter domain. SH1 helix and Switch-2 loop communicate via a highly conserved loop that wedges against the SH1-helix upon Switch-2 closing.     

Location of actin, myosin, and microtubular structures during directed locomotion of Dictyostelium amebae

During their life cycle, amebae of the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum aggregate to form multicellular structures in which differentiation takes place. Aggregation depends upon the release of chemotactic signals of 3',5'-cAMP from aggregation centers. In response to the signals, aggregating amebae elongate, actively more toward the attractive source, and may be easily identified from the other cells because of their polarized appearance. To examine the role of cytoskeletal components during ameboid locomotion, immunofluorescence microscopy with antibodies to actin, myosin, and to a microtubule-associated component was used. In addition, rhodamine-labeled phallotoxin was employed. Actin and myosin display a rather uniform distribution in rounded unstretched cells. In polarized locomoting cells, actin fluorescence (due to both labeled phallotoxin and specific antibody) is prevalently concentrated in the anterior pseudopod while myosin fluorescence appears to be excluded from the pseudopod. Similarly, microtubules in locomoting cells are excluded from the leading pseudopod. The cell nucleus is attached to the microtubule network by way of a nucleus-associated organelle serving as a microtubule-organizing center and seems to be maintained in a rather fixed position by the microtubules. These findings, together with available morphological and biochemical evidences, are consistent with a mechanism in which polymerized actin is moved into the pseudopod through its interaction with myosin at the base of the pseudopod. Microtubules, apparently, do not actively participate in movement but seem to behave as anchorage structures for the nucleus and possibly other cytoplasmic organelles.     

Intracellular vesicle movement, cAMP and myosin II in Dictyostelium

Dictyostelium amoebae were analyzed before and after rapid addition of 10(-6) M cAMP for cellular motility, dynamic shape changes, and intracellular particle movement. Before cAMP addition, amoebae moved in a persistent anterior fashion and were elongate with F-actin localized predominantly in the anterior pseudopod. Intracellular particles moved rapidly and anteriorly. Within seconds after 10(-6) M cAMP addition, cells stopped translocating, pseudopod formation ceased, intracellular particle movement was depressed, and F-actin was lost from the pseudopod and concomitantly relocalized in the cell cortex. After 10 seconds, expansion zones reappeared but were small and no longer anteriorly localized. Vesicle movement partially rebounded but was no longer anteriorly directed. The myosin II null mutant HS2215 exhibited both depressed cellular translocation and vesicle movement. The addition of cAMP to HS2215 cells did not result in any detectable change in the random, depressed movement of particles. The results with HS2215 suggest that myosin II is essential for (1) rapid cellular translocation, (2) cellular polarity, (3) rapid particle movement, (4) anteriorly directed particle movement, and (5) the cAMP response. Electron micrographs suggest that at least half of the particles examined in this study contain in turn smaller membrane bound vesicles or multilamellar membrane bodies. The possible role of these vesicles is discussed.     

Dictyostelium myosin II heavy-chain kinase A is activated by autophosphorylation: studies with Dictyostelium myosin II and synthetic peptides

One of the major sites phosphorylated on the Dictyostelium myosin II heavy chain by the Dictyostelium myosin II heavy-chain kinase A (MHCK A) is Thr-2029. Two synthetic peptides based on the sequence of the Dictyostelium myosin II heavy chain around Thr-2029 have been synthesized: MH-1 (residues 2020-2035; RKKFGESEKTKTKEFL-amide) and MH-2 (residues 2024-2035). Both peptides are substrates for MHCK A and are phosphorylated to a level of 1 mol of phosphate/mol. Tryptic digests indicate that the peptides are phosphorylated on the threonine corresponding to Thr-2029. When assays are initiated by the addition of MHCK A, the rate of phosphate incorporation into the peptides increases progressively for 4-6 min. The increasing activity of MHCK A over this time period is a result of autophosphorylation. Although each 130-kDa subunit of MHCK A can incorporate up to 10 phosphate molecules, 3 molecules of phosphate per subunit are sufficient to completely activate the kinase. Autophosphorylated MHCK A displays Vmax values of 2.2 and 0.6 mumol.min-1.mg-1 and Km values of 100 and 1200 microM with peptides MH-1 and MH-2, respectively. Unphosphorylated MHCK A displays a 50-fold lower Vmax with MH-1 but only a 2-fold greater Km. In the presence of Dictyostelium myosin II, the rate of autophosphorylation of MHCK A is increased 4-fold. If assays are performed at 4 degrees C (to slow the rate of MHCK A autophosphorylation), autophosphorylation can be shown to increase the activity of MHCK A with myosin II.     

The distribution of myosin II in Dictyostelium discoideum slug cells

While the role of myosin II in muscle contraction has been well characterized, less is known about the role of myosin II in non-muscle cells. Recent molecular genetic experiments on Dictyostelium discoideum show that myosin II is necessary for cytokinesis and multicellular development. Here we use immunofluorescence microscopy with monoclonal and polyclonal antimyosin antibodies to visualize myosin II in cells of the multicellular D. discoideum slug. A subpopulation of peripheral and anterior cells label brightly with antimyosin II antibodies, and many of these cells display a polarized intracellular distribution of myosin II. Other cells in the slug label less brightly and their cytoplasm displays a more homogeneous distribution of myosin II. These results provide insight into cell motility within a three-dimensional tissue and they are discussed in relation to the possible roles of myosin II in multicellular development.     

The effect of phosphorylation of gizzard myosin on actin activation

Gizzard myosin is phosphorylated by a kinase found in chicken gizzards. The 20,000 dalton light chains are the only subunits to show an appreciable extent of ³²P incorporation. Phosphorylation requires trace amounts of Ca²⁺. The Mg²⁺-ATPase activity of gizzard myosin in the phosphorylated form is activated to an appreciable extent by skeletal actin, whereas the activation of the non-phosphorylated myosin is verylow. These results suggest that the Ca²⁺-sensitive regulatory mechanism of gizzard actomyosin is mediated via a kinase. In the presence of Ca²⁺ the onset of contraction and the resultant increase of the Mg²⁺-ATPase activity we suggest is due, at least partly, to the phosphorylation of the 20,000 dalton light chains. Whether or not Ca²⁺ binding by myosin is also essential remains to be established.     

Electron microscopic localization of myosin II and ABP-120 in the cortical actin matrix of Dictyostelium amoebae using IgG-gold conjugates

To narrow the field of possible functions of an actin-binding protein (ABP-120) and myosin II, we have used high resolution immunocytochemistry with IgG-colloidal gold conjugates to identify the types of actin containing structures with which these proteins are associated in the isolated cell cortex. Staining for myosin II and ABP-120 is associated with distinct regions of the actin cytoskeleton in isolated cortices. Myosin II is localized to lateral arrays of filaments, where it is clustered and has a density that is unrelated to distance from the plasma membrane. Staining for myosin II is associated also with unidentified cytoplasmic vesicles. However, staining for ABP-120 is concentrated in dense networks of branched microfilaments that are adjacent to the plasma membrane or in surface projections (residual pseudopods and lamellopods). These results are consistent with a role for ABP-120 in the formation of filament networks in vivo and further suggest that networks of branched microfilaments are unlikely to participate in motility that is mediated by myosin II.     

Relative distribution of actin, myosin I, and myosin II during the wound healing response of fibroblasts

Myosin I is present in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts and its localization reflects a possible involvement in the extension and/or retraction of protrusions at the leading edge of locomoting cells and the transport of vesicles, but not in the contraction of stress fibers or transverse fibers. An affinity-purified polyclonal antibody to brush border myosin I colocalizes with a polypeptide of 120 kD in fibroblast extracts. Within initial protrusions of polarized, migrating fibroblasts, myosin I exhibits a punctate distribution, whereas actin is diffuse and myosin II is absent. Myosin I also exists in linear arrays parallel to the direction of migration in filopodia and microspikes, established protrusions, and within the leading lamellae of migrating cells. Myosin II and actin colocalize along transverse fibers in the lamellae of migrating cells, while myosin I displays no definitive organization along these fibers. During contractions of actin-based fibers, myosin II is concentrated in the center of the cell, while the distribution of myosin I does not change. Thus, myosin I is found at the correct location and time to be involved in the extension and/or retraction of protrusions and the transport of vesicles. Myosin II-based contractions in more posterior cellular regions could generate forces to separate cells, maintain a polarized cell shape, maintain the direction of locomotion, maximize the rate of locomotion, and/or aid in the delivery of cytoskeletal/contractile subunits to the leading edge.     

Investigating a back door mechanism of actin phosphate release by steered molecular dynamics

In actin-based cell motility, phosphate (Pi) release after ATP hydrolysis is an essential biochemical process, but the actual pathway of Pi separation from actin is not well understood. We report a series of molecular dynamics simulations that induce the dissociation of Pi from actin. After cleavage from ATP, the singly protonated phosphate (HPO4(2-)) rotates about the ADP-associated Ca2+ ion, turning away from the negatively charged ADP towards the putative exit near His73. To reveal the microscopic processes underlying the release of Pi, adhesion forces were measured when pulling the substrate out of its binding pocket. The results suggest that the separation from the divalent cation is the rate-limiting step in Pi release. Protonation of HPO4(2-) to H2PO4- lowers the electrostatic barrier during Pi liberation from the ion. The simulations revealed a propensity of charged His73+ to form a salt bridge with HPO4(2-), but not with H2PO4-. His73 stabilizes HPO4(2-) and, thereby, inhibits rapid Pi release from actin. Arg177 remains attached to Pi along the putative back door pathway, suggesting a shuttle function that facilitates the transport of Pi to a binding site on the protein surface.     

Fluorescence-mediated visualization of actin and myosin filaments in the contractile membrane-cytoskeleton complex of Dictyostelium discoideum

An intact complex that consisted of the cell membrane and cytoskeleton was prepared from Dictyostelium amoebae by an improved version of the method previously used by CLARKE et al. (1975). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 72: 1758-1762. After cells had attached tightly to a polylysine-coated coverslip in the presence of a divalent cation, the upper portions of the cells were removed with a jet of microfilament-stabilizing solution squirted from a syringe. The cell membranes left on the coverslip were immediately stained with tetramethylrhodamine-conjugated phalloidin for staining of actin filaments, and with antibody against myosin from Dictyostelium and a fluorescein-conjugated second antibody for staining of myosin. Networks of actin filaments and numerous rod-like structures of myosin (myosin filaments) aligned along them were observed on the exposed cytoplasmic surfaces of the cell membranes. These networks were similar to those observed in the cortex of fixed whole cells. Addition of ATP to these intact complexes of cell membrane and cytoskeleton caused the aggregation of both actin and myosin into several dot-like structures of actin on the cell membrane. Similar dot-like structures were also seen in the cortex of fixed whole cells, and their changes in distribution correlated with the motile activity of the cells. Transmission electron microscopy showed that these dot-like structures were composed of an electron-dense structure at the center, from which numerous actin filaments radiated outwards. These observations suggest that these novel dot-like structures are organizing centers for cortical actin filaments and may possibly be related to the adhesion of cells to the substratum.     

Regulatory mechanism of Dictyostelium myosin light chain kinase A

In this study, we examined the activation mechanism of Dictyostelium myosin light chain kinase A (MLCK-A) using constitutively active Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase as a surrogate MLCK-A kinase. MLCK-A was phosphorylated at Thr166 by constitutively active Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase, resulting in an approximately 140-fold increase in catalytic activity, using intact Dictyostelium myosin II. Recombinant Dictyostelium myosin II regulatory light chain and Kemptamide were also readily phosphorylated by activated MLCK-A. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that MLCK-A expressed by Escherichia coli was autophosphorylated at Thr289 and that, subsequent to Thr166 phosphorylation, MLCK-A also underwent a slow rate of autophosphorylation at multiple Ser residues. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we show that autophosphorylation at Thr289 is required for efficient phosphorylation and activation by an upstream kinase. By performing enzyme kinetics analysis on a series of MLCK-A truncation mutants, we found that residues 283-288 function as an autoinhibitory domain and that autoinhibition is fully relieved by Thr166 phosphorylation. Simple removal of this region resulted in a significant increase in the kcat of MLCK-A; however, it did not generate maximum enzymatic activity. Together with the results of our kinetic analysis of the enzymes, these findings demonstrate that Thr166 phosphorylation of MLCK-A by an upstream kinase subsequent to autophosphorylation at Thr289 results in generation of maximum MLCK-A activity through both release of an autoinhibitory domain from its catalytic core and a further increase (15-19-fold) in the kcat of the enzyme.     

Insertion or deletion of a single residue in the strut sequence of Dictyostelium myosin II abolishes strong binding to actin

The strut loop, one of the three loops that connects the upper and lower 50K subdomains of myosin, plays a role as a "strut" to keep the relative disposition of the two subdomains. A single residue was either inserted into or deleted from this loop. The insertion or deletion mutation abolished the in vivo motor functions of myosin, as revealed by the fact that the mutant myosins did not complement the phenotypic defects of the myosin-null cells. In vitro studies of purified full-length myosins and their subfragment-1s (S1s) revealed that the insertion mutants virtually lost the strong binding to actin although their motor functions in the absence of actin remained almost normal, showing that only the hydrophobic actin-myosin association was selectively affected by the insertion mutations. Unlike the insertion mutants, the deletion mutant showed defects both in the strong-binding state and the rate-limiting step of ATPase cycle. These results indicate the functional importance of the strut loop in establishing the strong-binding state of myosin and thereby achieving successful power strokes.