Differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar by PCR: a preliminary study in Izmir, Turkey

The causative agent of amoebiasis is currently attributed to two distinct species (E. histolytica and E. dispar). The aim of this study was to differentiate these species by PCR in stool samples. Isolated genomic DNA was amplified by PCR and band products of 101 bp (E. dispar) were obtained. All seven stool samples were found to be E. dispar, not E. histolytica. Our results demonstrated the significance of E. histolytica/dispar differentiation in the diagnosis of amoebiasis. This study is preliminary to our current research project entitled "Investigation of the prevalence of amoebiasis and Entamoeba species in Izmir and its hinterland".     

Detection of Entamoeba histolytica antigen in stool samples in Mersin, Turkey

Entameoba histolytica, 1 of the 2 Entamoeba species with similar morphology that infect humans, causes invasive intestinal and extraintestinal diseases, whereas Entamoeba dispar is found commensally and is noninvasive. Because of their morphologic similarity, E. histolytica and E. dispar cannot be differentiated microscopically. The antigens of E. histolytica and E. dispar, however, may be detected by the ELISA method. Previous studies have found that the detection of antigens in the stool is as sensitive and specific as cultures and isoenzyme analyses. Stool samples from 272 patients with diarrhea in the province of Mersin, Turkey, were examined for the presence of Entamoeba species microscopically and for Entamoeba (E. histolytica/E. dispar) antigens using the ELISA method. An E. histolytica-specific ELISA test was used to examine 29 E. histolytica/E. disparpositive samples. Twenty-four (8.82%) of the samples tested positive for E. histolytica/E. dispar by trichrome staining, and 29 (10.6%) of the samples tested positive for E. histolytica/E. dispar by the Entamoeba screening test. Entamoeba histolytica was positive in 21 (7.72%) and E. dispar positive in 8 (2.94%) samples. The detection of true E. histolytica infection is possible with the use of E. histolytica-specific antigen ELISA tests. Thus, real cases of amoebiasis can be detected and treated, and overtreatment of the patients with E. dispar, which is the nonpathogenic species, will be prevented.     

Entamoeba histolytica: rapid identification and differentiation of Indian isolates by riboprinting

Entamoeba histolytica infection still remains one of the major public health problem for developing countries like India. A rapid and accurate detection of this parasite is essential for prevention and control of amoebiasis. In this study, using the method of 'riboprinting' (PCR-RFLP of rRNA genes from amoeba) we have analysed 15 stool samples from symptomatic patients of amoebiasis. All 15 patients of clinical amoebiasis had E. histolytica in their stool and two of the samples also showed mixed infection of E. dispar. Apart from the known restriction enzyme sites within the amoeba SSU-rRNA genes, a new Sau3A site having a discriminatory value is identified in these E. histolytica isolates from India. Hence, it is possible to rapidly identify E. histolytica DNA and differentiating it from E. dispar using minute amounts of clinical stool samples, thus eliminating the laborious parasite culturing process. Thus, riboprinting is advantageous for clearcut identification of E. histolytica in order to decide an effective antiamoebic therapy.     

Molecular differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar from Tunisian food handlers with amoeba infection initially diagnosed by microscopy

The purpose of the study was to obtain more reliable epidemiological data concerning Entamoeba (E.) histolytica infection in Tunisian food handlers using established molecular tools able to differentiate E. histolytica from E. dispar. From 2002 to 2005, 4,266 fresh stools specimens received in the setting of the National program of food handlers' control were analysed by optical microscopy. Twelve (2.8 per thousand) were positive for the presence of four nuclei cysts identified as E. histolytica/E. dispar. Extraction of DNA from the 12 samples, followed by specific amplifications of E. histolytica and E. dispar SSU rDNA, showed that 11 samples (92%) were positive for E. dispar and negative for E. histolytica. Sequencing analysis of 8 PCR products permitted to verify the results obtained with conventional PCR. The remaining sample was negative by PCR amplifying E. histolytica DNA or E. dispar DNA specifically, although it did not show any inhibition. It probably contains protozoan cysts genetically distinct from these two species but morphological similar. Estimation of relative proportions between E. histolytica and E. dispar in cyst carriers showed that all explored individuals harboured the non pathogenic E. dispar strains. This result highlights the need of use in this population of complementary tests that allow specific diagnosis and obviate unnecessary chemotherapy.     

Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar: prevalence infection in a rural Mexican community

The frequency of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar infection was analyzed in a rural community in the state of Morelos, Mexico, through PCR technique by using specie specific primer. The E. histolytica specie was detected in 33 of 290 analyzed stool samples (11.4%), E. dispar specie was observed in 21 samples (7.2%) and both species of Entamoeba were detected in seven samples (2.4%). So a higher E. histolytica than E. dispar frequency infection was detected (13.8 versus 9.6%). Even though in our design we did not considered the follow-up of included individuals, the absence of invasive amebiasis cases in the studied population during our stay in town was unexpected.     

Entamoeba histolytica and/or Entamoeba dispar: infection frequency in HIV+/AIDS patients in Mexico city

The objective of this work was to evaluate the frequency of Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar intestinal infection in HIV+/AIDS subjects and their HIV- close relatives or sexual partners. Enteric parasites were investigated in stool samples by microscopic examination and E. histolytica and E. dispar were identified by PCR. We found by microscopic analysis in HIV+/AIDS group that the E. histolytica/E. dispar complex was present in 5.9% of the members, while in the HIV- group was 2.9%. With PCR we found that the E. histolytica prevalence was 25.3% in the HIV+/AIDS group and 18.5% in the HIV-group. The difference in the results obtained with the microscopic and PCR is due to the different sensibility of the procedures. Besides, we found patients who were infected with E. histolytica in both groups were asymptomatic cyst passers. Our results suggest that E. histolytica strains prevalent in the studied community appear to be of low pathogenic potential.     

Detection of Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar in stool specimens by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Entamoeba histolytica actually comprises two genetically distinct but morphologically indistinguishable species. E. histolytica can cause invasive intestinal and extra intestinal disease, while E. dispar cannot. Identification and differentiation of E. dispar and E. histolytica in stool sample by microscopy is imprecise. Several weeks of culture and isoenzyme analysis are required to differentiate E. histolytica from E. dispar. In this study, we have used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of E. histolytica/E.dispar and compared it with microscopy. Eighty-eight samples were evaluated, trichrome staining was positive in 20.4% (18) and ELISA was positive in 29.5% (26). Both tests were positive in 14 (15.9%) samples, 4 (4.5%) only with direct microscopy, and 12 (13.6%) only with ELISA. Both tests were negative in 58 (65.9%) samples. Microscopy has low sensitivity and high specificity, low negative predictive value and high positive predictive value in comparison with ELISA. E. histolytica/E. dispar antigen detection ELISA tests are inexpensive compared to the specific tests, yield objective results and do not require experienced microscopists and can therefore be recommended for screening of stools worldwide and the results can be taken for treatment that are fitting with its clinic.     

Comparison of two methods (microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for the diagnosis of amebiasis

Diagnosis of amebiasis is usually performed on a clinical basis alone in most endemic countries having limited economic resources. This epidemiological study was conducted using modern diagnostic tests for amebiasis in the southeastern region of Turkey, an endemic area for amebiasis. The population of this study included patients with symptomatic diarrhea/dysentery attending both Yuzuncu Yil University, Van and Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey. A total of 380 stool specimens were collected and examined for Entamoeba by light microscopy (fresh, lugol, and trichrome staining) and stool antigen detection based- enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) test (TechLab Entamoeba histolytica II). 24% (91/380) of stool specimens were positive for E. histolytica/Entamoeba dispar trophozoites/cysts microscopically using trichrome staining. 13% (51/380) of the stool specimens were found to be positive for E. histolytica by the EIA test, including 15% (14/91) of microscopy (+) stool specimens and 13% (37/289) of microscopy (-) stool specimens. Enteric parasites were common in these populations with 66% (251/380) of the study population harboring more than one parasite. In addition to the 13% (51/380) of patients determined to have E. histolytica by EIA, eighty-six patients (22.6%) had Blastocystis hominis, 54 (14.2%) Entamoeba coli, 44 (11.5%) Giardia lamblia, 16 (4.2%) Chilomastix mesnili, 15 (3.9%) Iodamoeba bütschlii, 12 (3.1%) Hymenolepis nana, 9 (2.3%) Endolimax nana, 9 (2.3%) Dientamoeba fragilis, and 8 (2.1%) had Ascaris lumbricoides. We concluded that E. histolytica infection was found in 13% of the patients presenting with diarrhea in Van and Sanliurfa Turkey.     

Asymptomatic cyst passers of Entamoeba histolytica but not Entamoeba dispar in institutions for the mentally retarded in Japan

Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar was isolated from 50 asymptomatic amebic cyst passers in three institutions for the mentally retarded in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. To distinguish between E. histolytica and E. dispar, the isolates were analyzed by PCR, reactivity to monoclonal antibodies, and zymodemes. All isolates were identified as E. histolytica. The results lead us to conceive that, in Japan, E. histolytica is predominant even in asymptomatic cyst passers.     

Development of simple and stable ELISA for detection of copro antigen in intestinal amoebiasis

A simple, sensitive and stable ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) was developed using rabbit antibody to fractionated Entamoeba histolytica antigen for the detection of copro antigen in the faeces of individuals with intestinal amoebiasis. In this test none of the healthy individuals, all trophozoite positive, 40% cyst passers and 6% individuals living in endemic area showed the presence of copro antigen. ELISA using polyclonal rabbit antibody could detect 1-5 trophozoites/well and 20-50 ng protein per well of NIH-200 strain of E. histolytica and the sensitivity of the test was comparable with that using monoclonal antibody. Cross reaction was observed only with E. invadens when faeces having other parasites were screened. The reagents of ELISA were stabilized and found to be stable for more than 6 months when stored at 4 degrees C.     

Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii Infection among Three Orang Asli Ethnic Groups in Malaysia

Background

Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba moshkovskii infection is still prevalent in rural Malaysia especially among Orang Asli communities. Currently, information on prevalence of this infection among different ethnic groups of Orang Asli is unavailable in Malaysia. To contribute to a better comprehension of the epidemiology of this infection, a cross-sectional study aimed at providing the first documented data on the prevalence and risk factors associated with E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii infection was carried out among three Orang Asli ethnic groups (Proto-Malay, Negrito, and Senoi) in selected villages in Negeri Sembilan, Perak, and Pahang states, Malaysia.

Methods/Findings

Faecal samples were examined by formalin-ether sedimentation and trichrome staining techniques. Of 500 individuals, 8.7% (13/150) of Proto-Malay, 29.5% (41/139) of Negrito, and 18.5% (39/211) of Senoi were positive for E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii, respectively. The prevalence of this infection showed an age-dependency relationship, with higher rates observed among those aged less than 15 years in all ethnic groups studied. Multivariate analysis confirmed that not washing hands after playing with soils or gardening and presence of other family members infected with E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii were significant risk factors of infection among all ethnic groups. However, eating with hands, the consumption of raw vegetables, and close contact with domestic animals were identified as significant risk factors in Senoi.

Conclusions

Essentially, the findings highlighted that E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii parasites are still prevalent in Malaysia. Further studies using molecular approaches to distinguish the morphologically identical species of pathogenic, E. histolytica from the non-pathogenic, E. dispar and E. moshkovskii are needed. The establishment of such data will be beneficial for the public health authorities in the planning and implementation of specific prevention and control strategies of this infection in different Orang Asli ethnic groups in Malaysia.     

Entamoeba dispar: infrastructure, Surface Properties and Cytopathic Effect

The cytological features of Entamoeba dispar , recently recognized by biochemical and molecular biology criteria as a distinct species, were compared to those of Entamoeba histolytica. When cultured under axenic conditions, living trophozoites of E. dispar strain SAW 760RR clone A were more elongated in form, had a single frontal pseudopodium, and showed a noticeable uroid. In sections of E. dispar trophozoites stained with Toluidine blue, characteristic areas of cytoplasmic metachromasia were seen due to the presence of large deposits of glycogen, seldom found in E. histolytica strain HM1:IMSS. Under the light microscope the periphery of the nucleus in E. dispar was lined by finer, more regularly distributed dense granules. With transmission electron microscopy the surface coat of E. dispar was noticeable thinner. In addition, E. dispar had a lower sensitivity to agglutinate with concanavalin A and a higher negative surface charge, measured by cellular microelectrophoresis. The cytopathic effect of E. dispar was much slower, analyzed by the gradual loss of transmural electrical resistance of MDCK epithelial cell monolayers mounted in Ussing chambers. Whereas in E. histolytica phagocytosis of epithelial cells plays an important role in its cytopathic effect, E. dispar trophozoites placed in contact with MDCK cells showed only rare evidence of phagocytosis. The results demonstrate that the morphology of E. dispar is different to that of E. histolytica , both at the light microscopical and the ultrastructural levels. In addition, they show that E. dispar in axenic culture has a moderate cytopathic effect on epithelial cell monolayers. However, when compared to E. histolytica, the in vitro lytic capacity of E. dispar is much slower and less intense.     

Comparative genomic hybridizations of Entamoeba strains reveal unique genetic fingerprints that correlate with virulence

Variable phenotypes have been identified for Entamoeba species. Entamoeba histolytica is invasive and causes colitis and liver abscesses but only in approximately 10% of infected individuals; 90% remain asymptomatically colonized. Entamoeba dispar, a closely related species, is avirulent. To determine the extent of genetic diversity among Entamoeba isolates and potential genotype-phenotype correlations, we have developed an E. histolytica genomic DNA microarray and used it to genotype strains of E. histolytica and E. dispar. On the basis of the identification of divergent genetic loci, all strains had unique genetic fingerprints. Comparison of divergent genetic regions allowed us to distinguish between E. histolytica and E. dispar, identify novel genetic regions usable for strain and species typing, and identify a number of genes restricted to virulent strains. Among the four E. histolytica strains, a strain with attenuated virulence was the most divergent and phylogenetically distinct strain, raising the intriguing possibility that genetic subtypes of E. histolytica may be partially responsible for the observed variability in clinical outcomes. This microarray-based genotyping assay can readily be applied to the study of E. histolytica clinical isolates to determine genetic diversity and potential genotypic-phenotypic associations.     

Species- and strain-specific probes derived from repetitive DNA for distinguishing Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar

Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar are two morphologically indistinguishable species that are found in the human gut. Of the two, E. histolytica is considered to be pathogenic while E. dispar is nonpathogenic. To generate molecular probes to detect and distinguish between the two species, we utilized repeat sequences present in Entamoeba genome. We have developed probes and primers from rDNA episomes, and unidentified Entamoeba EST1 repeat for this purpose, and used them for dot blot hybridization and PCR amplification. To investigate the possible existence of invasive and noninvasive strains of E. histolytica, the ability to differentiate individual isolates is necessary. For this purpose, we have utilized a modification of the AFLP procedure called 'Transposon display,' which generates and displays large number of genomic bands associated with a transposon. We have used the abundant retrotransposon, EhSINE1, for this purpose,and demonstrated its potential as a marker to study strain variation in E. histolytica. This technique could suitably be employed in carrying out significant molecular epidemiological studies and large-scale typing of this parasite.     

Entamoeba dispar: molecular characterization of the galactose/N-acetyl-d-galactosamine lectin

Amebiasis contributes to approximately 50 million cases of life-threatening dysentery worldwide. Comparison of the lectins from Entamoeba histolytica (pathogenic) and Entamoeba dispar (nonpathogenic) was undertaken to elucidate the differential roles of this molecule in invasion versus colonization. Surface lectin was less abundant on axenic E. dispar than on axenic E. histolytica, commensurate with differences in lectin (heavy and light subunits) RNA when assessed by semiquantitative RT-PCR. The 1G7 epitope, which falls within the immunodominant and immunoprotective cysteine-rich region (480-900), was absent on axenic E. dispar. Indirect immunofluorescence, transient transection of COS7, and immunoprecipitation demonstrated that the 1G7 epitope was conserved in the nonpathogenic lectin homologue but not exposed on live E. dispar trophozoites. Hgl2 (E. histolytica) and Dhgl2 (E. dispar) lectin homologues demonstrated comparable high-affinity binding to multivalent GalNAc(19) BSA. These data provide evidence for relative gene and conformational regulation of the E.dispar lectin.     

Evidence of gene conversion in genes encoding the Gal/GalNac lectin complex of Entamoeba

The human gut parasite Entamoeba histolytica, uses a lectin complex on its cell surface to bind to mucin and to ligands on the intestinal epithelia. Binding to mucin is necessary for colonisation and binding to intestinal epithelia for invasion, therefore blocking this binding may protect against amoebiasis. Acquired protective immunity raised against the lectin complex should create a selection pressure to change the amino acid sequence of lectin genes in order to avoid future detection. We present evidence that gene conversion has occurred in lineages leading to E. histolytica strain HM1:IMSS and E. dispar strain SAW760. This evolutionary mechanism generates diversity and could contribute to immune evasion by the parasites.     

Nonpathogenic Entamoeba dispar quickly outgrows pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica in mixed xenic cultures

Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar are two microscopically indistinguishable amoebae living in the human colon. The former is a pathogen, whereas the latter is a nonpathogenic commensal. Using a model system of in vitro cocultures and PCR detection of the Entamoeba species, we found that the nonpathogenic species can rapidly outgrow the pathogen in xenic cultures.     

Pore-forming peptides of Entamoeba dispar. Similarity and divergence to amoebapores in structure, expression and activity.

Amoebapore, a 77-residue peptide with pore-forming activity from the human pathogen Entamoeba histolytica, is implicated in the killing of phagocytosed bacteria and in the cytolytic reaction of the amoeba against host cells. Previously, we structurally and functionally characterized three amoebapore isoforms in E. histolytica but recognized only one homolog in the closely related but non-pathogenic species Entamoeba dispar. Here, we identified two novel amoebapore homologs from E. dispar by molecular cloning. Despite strong resemblance of the primary structures of the homologs, molecular modeling predicts a species-specific variance between the peptide structures. Parallel isolation from trophozoite extracts of the two species revealed a lower amount of pore-forming peptides in E. dispar and substantially higher activity of the major isoform from E. histolytica towards natural membranes than that from E. dispar. Differences in abundance and activity of the lytic polypeptides may have an impact on the pathogenicity of amoebae.     

A lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein, KERP1, from Entamoeba histolytica binds to human enterocytes

Contact-dependent cytolysis of host cells by Entamoeba histolytica is an important hallmark of amoebiasis that points out the importance of molecules involved in the interaction between the parasite and the human cells. To decipher the molecular and cellular mechanisms supporting the invasion of the intestinal epithelium by E. histolytica, we analysed proteins involved in the interaction of the parasite with enterocytes. Affinity chromatography revealed several amoebic proteins interacting with purified brush border of differentiated Caco2 cells. Among them were found the intermediate subunit of the Gal/GalNAc lectin, an alpha-actinin-like protein and two new proteins KERP1 and KERP2 rich in lysine and glutamic acid. In silico analysis revealed the presence of KERP2 in the closely related non-pathogenic amoeba species Entamoeba dispar but not of KERP1. In additon, polymerase chain reaction analysis allowed to suggest the absence of kerp1 homologous gene in E. dispar. Therefore, we concentrated on the cellular analysis of KERP1. Cloning of the KERP1-encoding gene, production of a recombinant protein in Escherichia coli and production of a specific antibody allowed us to show the following properties: (i) purified KERP1 binds to epithelial cell surface, (ii) KERP1 is located on the plasma membrane and in vesicles of trophozoites and (iii) KERP1 is delivered in the interstitial area between the trophozoites and the intestinal cells.     

Morphometric study of the hepatic lesions experimentally induced in hamsters by Entamoeba dispar and E. histolytica

Evolution of experimental hepatic lesions produced in hamsters with Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively through morphometry and immunohistochemistry. Animals infected with E. dispar developed hepatic lesions quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those produced by E. histolytica on the first three days of infection. On the 6th and 8th days of infection, E. histolytica produced larger tissue damage than E. dispar. A gradual decrease was observed in the number of trophozoites along the infection. A negative correlation was observed between the reduced number of trophozoites and the larger area of necrosis in both groups, confirming the importance of trophozoites killed in the lesion genesis. Regarding the genetic similarity between E. histolytica and E. dispar, comparison strategy between lesions produced by these species may culminate in identifying virulence factors of E. histolytica.