Functional association between three archaeal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are responsible for attaching amino acids to their cognate tRNAs during protein synthesis. In eukaryotes aaRSs are commonly found in multi-enzyme complexes, although the role of these complexes is still not completely clear. Associations between aaRSs have also been reported in archaea, including a complex between prolyl-(ProRS) and leucyl-tRNA synthetases (LeuRS) in Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus that enhances tRNA(Pro) aminoacylation. Yeast two-hybrid screens suggested that lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) also associates with LeuRS in M. thermautotrophicus. Co-purification experiments confirmed that LeuRS, LysRS, and ProRS associate in cell-free extracts. LeuRS bound LysRS and ProRS with a comparable K(D) of about 0.3-0.9 microm, further supporting the formation of a stable multi-synthetase complex. The steady-state kinetics of aminoacylation by LysRS indicated that LeuRS specifically reduced the Km for tRNA(Lys) over 3-fold, with no additional change seen upon the addition of ProRS. No significant changes in aminoacylation by LeuRS or ProRS were observed upon the addition of LysRS. These findings, together with earlier data, indicate the existence of a functional complex of three aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in archaea in which LeuRS improves the catalytic efficiency of tRNA aminoacylation by both LysRS and ProRS.     

Evolutionary coadaptation of the motif 2--acceptor stem interaction in the class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase system

Known crystal structures of class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases complexed to their cognate tRNAs reveal that critical acceptor stem contacts are made by the variable loop connecting the beta-strands of motif 2 located within the catalytic core of class II synthetases. To identify potential acceptor stem contacts made by Escherichia coli prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS), an enzyme of unknown structure, we performed cysteine-scanning mutagenesis in the motif 2 loop. We identified an arginine residue (R144) that was essential for tRNA aminoacylation but played no role in amino acid activation. Cross-linking experiments confirmed that the end of the tRNA(Pro) acceptor stem is proximal to this motif 2 loop residue. Previous work had shown that the tRNA(Pro) acceptor stem elements A73 and G72 (both strictly conserved among bacteria) are important recognition elements for E. coli ProRS. We carried out atomic group "mutagenesis" studies at these two positions of E. coli tRNA(Pro) and determined that major groove functional groups at A73 and G72 are critical for recognition by ProRS. Human tRNA(Pro), which lacks these elements, is not aminoacylated by the bacterial enzyme. An analysis of chimeric tRNA(Pro) constructs showed that, in addition to A73 and G72, transplantation of the E. coli tRNA(Pro) D-domain was necessary and sufficient to convert the human tRNA into a substrate for the bacterial synthetase. In contrast to the bacterial system, base-specific acceptor stem recognition does not appear to be used by human ProRS. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis revealed that motif 2 loop residues are not critical for tRNA aminoacylation activity of the human enzyme. Taken together, our results illustrate how synthetases and tRNAs have coadapted to changes in protein-acceptor stem recognition through evolution.     

Essentiality Assessment of Cysteinyl and Lysyl-tRNA Synthetases of Mycobacterium smegmatis

Discovery of mupirocin, an antibiotic that targets isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, established aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase as an attractive target for the discovery of novel antibacterial agents. Despite a high degree of similarity between the bacterial and human aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the selectivity observed with mupirocin triggered the possibility of targeting other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases as potential drug targets. These enzymes catalyse the condensation of a specific amino acid to its cognate tRNA in an energy-dependent reaction. Therefore, each organism is expected to encode at least twenty aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, one for each amino acid. However, a bioinformatics search for genes encoding aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases from Mycobacterium smegmatis returned multiple genes for glutamyl (GluRS), cysteinyl (CysRS), prolyl (ProRS) and lysyl (LysRS) tRNA synthetases. The pathogenic mycobacteria, namely, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae, were also found to possess two genes each for CysRS and LysRS. A similar search indicated the presence of additional genes for LysRS in gram negative bacteria as well. Herein, we describe sequence and structural analysis of the additional aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes found in M. smegmatis. Characterization of conditional expression strains of Cysteinyl and Lysyl-tRNA synthetases generated in M. smegmatis revealed that the canonical aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase are essential, while the additional ones are not essential for the growth of M. smegmatis.     

Cys-tRNA(Pro) editing by Haemophilus influenzae YbaK via a novel synthetase.YbaK.tRNA ternary complex

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are multidomain enzymes that often possess two activities to ensure translational accuracy. A synthetic active site catalyzes tRNA aminoacylation, while an editing active site hydrolyzes mischarged tRNAs. Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRS) have been shown to misacylate Cys onto tRNA(Pro), but lack a Cys-specific editing function. The synthetase-like Haemophilus influenzae YbaK protein was recently shown to hydrolyze misacylated Cys-tRNA(Pro) in trans. However, the mechanism of specific substrate selection by this single domain hydrolase is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that YbaK alone appears to lack specific tRNA recognition capabilities. Moreover, YbaK cannot compete for aminoacyl-tRNAs in the presence of elongation factor Tu, suggesting that YbaK acts before release of the aminoacyl-tRNA from the synthetase. In support of this idea, cross-linking studies reveal the formation of binary (ProRS.YbaK) and ternary (ProRS.YbaK.tRNA) complexes. The binding constants for the interaction between ProRS and YbaK are 550 nM and 45 nM in the absence and presence of tRNA(Pro), respectively. These results suggest that the specificity of trans-editing by YbaK is ensured through formation of a novel ProRS.YbaK.tRNA complex.     

Functional guanine-arginine interaction between tRNAPro and prolyl-tRNA synthetase that couples binding and catalysis

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of specific amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. Specific aminoacylation is dictated by a set of recognition elements that mark tRNA molecules as substrates for particular synthetases. Escherichia coli prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) has previously been shown to recognize specific bases of tRNA(Pro) in both the anticodon domain, which mediate initial complex formation, and in the acceptor stem, which is proximal to the site of catalysis. In this work, we unambiguously define the molecular interaction between E. coli ProRS and the acceptor stem of cognate tRNA(Pro). Oxidative cross-linking studies using 2'-deoxy-8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine-containing proline tRNAs identify a direct interaction between a critical arginine residue (R144) in the active site of E. coli ProRS and the G72 residue in the acceptor stem of tRNA(Pro). Assays conducted with motif 2 loop variants and tRNA mutants wherein specific atomic groups of G72 were deleted, are consistent with a functionally important hydrogen-bonding network between R144 and the major groove of G72. These results taken together with previous studies suggest that breaking this key contact uncouples the allosteric interaction between the anticodon domain and the aminoacylation active site, providing new insights into the communication network that governs the synthetase-tRNA interaction.     

Transfer RNA modulates the editing mechanism used by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. To prevent errors in protein synthesis, many synthetases have evolved editing pathways by which misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) and misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing) are hydrolyzed. Previous studies have shown that class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) possesses both pre- and post-transfer editing functions against noncognate alanine. To assess the relative contributions of pre- and post-transfer editing, presented herein are kinetic studies of an Escherichia coli ProRS mutant in which post-transfer editing is selectively inactivated, effectively isolating the pre-transfer editing pathway. When post-transfer editing is abolished, substantial levels of alanine mischarging are observed under saturating amino acid conditions, indicating that pre-transfer editing alone cannot prevent the formation of Ala-tRNA Pro. Steady-state kinetic parameters for aminoacylation measured under these conditions reveal that the preference for proline over alanine is 2000-fold, which is well within the regime where editing is required. Simultaneous measurement of AMP and Ala-tRNA Pro formation in the presence of tRNA Pro suggested that misactivated alanine is efficiently transferred to tRNA to form the mischarged product. In the absence of tRNA, enzyme-catalyzed Ala-AMP hydrolysis is the dominant form of editing, with "selective release" of noncognate adenylate from the active site constituting a minor pathway. Studies with human and Methanococcus jannaschii ProRS, which lack a post-transfer editing domain, suggest that enzymatic pre-transfer editing occurs within the aminoacylation active site. Taken together, the results reported herein illustrate how both pre- and post-transfer editing pathways work in concert to ensure accurate aminoacylation by ProRS.     

Substrate specificity of bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetase editing domain is controlled by a tunable hydrophobic pocket

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the covalent attachment of amino acids onto their cognate tRNAs. High fidelity in this reaction is crucial to the accurate decoding of genetic information and is ensured, in part, by proofreading of the newly synthesized aminoacyl-tRNAs. Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRS) mischarge tRNA(Pro) with alanine or cysteine due to their smaller or similar sizes relative to cognate proline. Mischarged Ala-tRNA(Pro) is hydrolyzed by an editing domain (INS) present in most bacterial ProRSs. In contrast, the INS domain is unable to deacylate Cys-tRNA(Pro), which is hydrolyzed exclusively by a freestanding trans-editing domain known as YbaK. Here, we have used computational and experimental approaches to probe the molecular basis of INS domain alanine specificity. We show that the methyl side chain of alanine binds in a well defined hydrophobic pocket characterized by conserved residues Ile-263, Leu-266, and Lys-279 and partially conserved residue Thr-277 in Escherichia coli ProRS. Site-specific mutation of these residues leads to a significant loss in Ala-tRNA(Pro) hydrolysis, and altering the size of the pocket modulates the substrate specificity. Remarkably, one ProRS INS domain variant displays a complete switch in substrate specificity from alanine to cysteine. The mutually exclusive aminoacyl-tRNA substrate specificities of the WT and engineered INS domains is consistent with the evolution of two distinct editing domains that function to clear Ala-tRNA(Pro) and Cys-tRNA(Pro) in vivo.     

Interaction of yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase and aspartyl-tRNA synthetase with Blue-dextran Sepharose : assignment of the Blue-Dextran Binding site on the synthetases

Yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase and aspartyl-tRNA synthetase like nucleotidyl transferases previously investigated interact with the Blue-Dextran-Sepharose affinity ligand through their tRNA binding domain: the enzymes are readily displaced from the affinity column by their cognate tRNAs but not by ATP or a mixture of ATP and the cognate amino acid in contrast to other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. In the absence of Mg⁺⁺, the arginyl-tRNA synthetase can be dissociated from the column by tRNA^Asp and tRNA^Phe which have been shown to be able to form a complex with the synthetase, but in presence of Mg⁺⁺ the elution is only obtained by the specific tRNA.The procedure described here can thus be used: (i) to detect polynucleotide binding sites in a protein; (ii) to estimate the relative affinities of different tRNAs for a purified synthetase; (iii) to purify an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by selective elution with the cognate tRNA.     

Initial position of aminoacylation of individual Escherichia coli, yeast, and calf liver transfer RNAs.

Transfer RNAs from Escherichia coli, yeast (Sacharomyces cerevisiae), and calf liver were subjected to controlled hydrolysis with venom exonuclease to remove 3'-terminal nucleotides, and then reconstructed successively with cytosine triphosphate (CTP) and 2'- or 3'-deoxyadenosine 5'-triphosphate in the presence of yeast CTP(ATP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase. The modified tRNAs were purified by chromatography on DBAE-cellulose or acetylated DBAE-cellulose and then utilized in tRNA aminoacylation experiments in the presence of the homologous aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activities. The E. coli, yeast, and calf liver aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases specific for alanine, glycine, histidine, lysine, serine, and threonine, as well as the E. coli and yeast prolyl-tRNA synthetases and the yeast glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase utilized only those homologous modified tRNAs terminating in 2'-deoxyadenosine (i.e., having an available 3'-OH group). This is interpreted as evidence that these aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases normally aminoacylate their unmodified cognate tRNAs on the 3'-OH group. The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases from all three sources specific argining, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and valine, as well as the E. coli and yeast enzymes specific for methionine and the E. coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, used as substrates exclusively those tRNAs terminating in 3'-deoxyadenosine. Certain aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, including the E. coli, yeast, and calf liver asparagine and tyrosine activating enzymes, the E. coli and yeast cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases, and the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase from yeast, utilized both isomeric tRNAs as substrates, although generally not at the same rate. While the calf liver aspartyl- and cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases utilized only the corresponding modified tRNA species terminating in 2'-deoxyadenosine, the use of a more concentrated enzyme preparation might well result in aminoacylation of the isomeric species. The one tRNA for which positional specificity does seem to have changed during evolution is tryptophan, whose E. coli aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase utilized predominantly the cognate tRNA terminating in 3'-deoxyadenosine, while the corresponding yeast and calf liver enzymes were found to utilize predominantly the isomeric tRNAs terminating in 2'-deoxyadenosine. The data presented indicate that while there is considerable diversity in the initial position of aminoacylation of individual tRNA isoacceptors derived from a single source, positional specificity has generally been conserved during the evolution from a prokaryotic to mammalian organism.     

Transfer RNA identity contributes to transition state stabilization during aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis.

Sequence-specific interactions between aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and their cognate tRNAs ensure both accurate RNA recognition and the efficient catalysis of aminoacylation. The effects of tRNA(Trp)variants on the aminoacylation reaction catalyzed by wild-type Escherichia coli tryptophanyl-tRNA synthe-tase (TrpRS) have now been investigated by stopped-flow fluorimetry, which allowed a pre-steady-state analysis to be undertaken. This showed that tRNA(Trp)identity has some effect on the ability of tRNA to bind the reaction intermediate TrpRS-tryptophanyl-adenylate, but predominantly affects the rate at which trypto-phan is transferred from TrpRS-tryptophanyl adenylate to tRNA. Use of the binding ( K (tRNA)) and rate constants ( k (4)) to determine the energetic levels of the various species in the aminoacylation reaction showed a difference of approximately 2 kcal mol(-1)in the barrier to transition state formation compared to wild-type for both tRNA(Trp)A-->C73 and. These results directly show that tRNA identity contributes to the degree of complementarity to the transition state for tRNA charging in the active site of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase:aminoacyl-adenylate:tRNA complex.     

Cysteine activation is an inherent in vitro property of prolyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are well known for their remarkable precision in substrate selection during aminoacyl-tRNA formation. Some synthetases enhance the accuracy of this process by editing mechanisms that lead to hydrolysis of incorrectly activated and/or charged amino acids. Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) can be divided into two structurally divergent groups, archaeal-type and bacterial-type enzymes. A striking difference between these groups is the presence of an insertion domain (approximately 180 amino acids) in the bacterial-type ProRS. Because the archaeal-type ProRS enzymes have been shown to recognize cysteine, we tested selected ProRSs from all three domains of life to determine whether cysteine activation is a general property of ProRS. Here we show that cysteine is activated by recombinant ProRS enzymes from the archaea Methanocaldococcus jannaschii and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus, from the eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and from the bacteria Aquifex aeolicus, Borrelia burgdorferi, Clostridium sticklandii, Cytophaga hutchinsonii, Deinococcus radiodurans, Escherichia coli, Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum, Novosphingobium aromaticivorans, Rhodopseudomonas palustris, and Thermus thermophilus. This non-cognate amino acid was efficiently acylated in vitro onto tRNA(Pro), and the misacylated Cys-tRNA(Pro) was not edited by ProRS. Therefore, ProRS exhibits a natural level of mischarging that is to date unequalled among the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.     

Unilateral aminoacylation specificity between bovine mitochondria and eubacteria

The present study shows unilateral aminoacylation specificity between bovine mitochondria and eubacteria (Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus) in five amino acid-specific aminoacylation systems. Mitochondrial synthetases were capable of charging eubacterial tRNA as well as mitochondrial tRNA, whereas eubacterial synthetases did not efficiently charge mitochondrial tRNA. Mitochondrial phenylalanyl-, threonyl-, arginyl-, and lysyl-tRNA synthetases were shown to charge and discriminate cognate E. coli tRNA species from noncognate ones strictly, as did the corresponding E. coli synthetases. By contrast, mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase not only charged cognate E. coli serine tRNA species but also extensively misacylated noncognate E. coli tRNA species. These results suggest a certain conservation of tRNA recognition mechanisms between the mitochondrial and E. coli aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in that anticodon sequences are most likely to be recognized by the former four synthetases, but not sufficiently by the seryl-tRNA synthetase. The unilaterality in aminoacylation may imply that tRNA recognition mechanisms of the mitochondrial synthetases have evolved to be, to some extent, simpler than their eubacterial counterparts in response to simplifications in the species-number and the structural elements of animal mitochondrial tRNAs.