Molecular mapping and functional characterization of the VEGF164 heparin-binding domain

The longer splice isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), including mouse VEGF164, contain a highly basic heparin-binding domain (HBD), which imparts the ability of these isoforms to be deposited in the heparan sulfate-rich extracellular matrix and to interact with the prototype sulfated glycosaminoglycan, heparin. The shortest isoform, VEGF120, lacks this highly basic domain and is freely diffusible upon secretion. Although the HBD has been attributed significant relevance to VEGF-A biology, the molecular determinants of the heparin-binding site are unknown. We used site-directed mutagenesis to identify amino acid residues that are critical for heparin binding activity of the VEGF164 HBD. We focused on basic residues and found Arg-13, Arg-14, and Arg-49 to be critical for heparin binding and interaction with extracellular matrix in tissue samples. We also examined the cellular and biochemical consequences of abolishing heparin-binding function, measuring the ability of the mutants to interact with VEGF receptors, induce endothelial cell gene expression, and trigger microvessel outgrowth. Induction of tissue factor expression, vessel outgrowth, and binding to VEGFR2 were unaffected by the HBD mutations. In contrast, the HBD mutants showed slightly decreased binding to the NRP1 (neuropilin-1) receptor, and analyses suggested the heparin and NRP1 binding sites to be distinct but overlapping. Finally, mutations that affect the heparin binding activity also led to an unexpected reduction in the affinity of VEGF164 binding specifically to VEGFR1. This finding provides a potential basis for previous observations suggesting enhanced potency of VEGF164 versus VEGF120 in VEGFR1-mediated signaling in inflammatory cells.     

Neuropilin-1 binds to VEGF121 and regulates endothelial cell migration and sprouting

Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) was first described as a receptor for the axon guidance molecule, Semaphorin3A, regulating the development of the nervous system. It was later shown that NRP1 is an isoform-specific receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), specifically VEGF(165). Much interest has been placed on the role of the various VEGF isoforms in vascular biology. Here we report that blocking NRP1 function, using a recently described antibody that inhibits VEGF(165) binding to NRP1, surprisingly reduces VEGF(121)-induced migration and sprout formation of endothelial cells. Intrigued by this observation, direct binding studies of NRP1 to various VEGF isoforms were performed. We show that VEGF(121) binds directly to NRP1; however, unlike VEGF(165), VEGF(121) is not sufficient to bridge the NRP1.VEGFR2 complex. Additionally, we show that VEGFR2 enhances VEGF(165), but not VEGF(121) binding to NRP1. We propose a new model for NRP1 interactions with various VEGF isoforms.     

VEGF165 mediates formation of complexes containing VEGFR-2 and neuropilin-1 that enhance VEGF165-receptor binding

Co-expression of NRP1 and (VEGFR-2) KDR on the surface of endothelial cells (EC) enhances VEGF165 binding to KDR and EC chemotaxis in response to VEGF165. Overexpression of NRP1 by prostate tumor cells in vivo results in increased tumor angiogenesis and growth. We investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying NRP1-mediated angiogenesis by analyzing the association of NRP1 and KDR. An intracellular complex containing NRP1 and KDR was immunoprecipitated from EC by anti-NRP1 antibodies only in the presence of VEGF165. In contrast, VEGF121, which does not bind to NRP1, did not support complex formation. Complexes containing VEGF165, NRP1, and KDR were also formed in an intercellular fashion by co-culture of EC expressing KDR only, with cells expressing NRP1 only, for example, breast carcinoma cells. VEGF165 also mediated the binding of a soluble NRP1 dimer to cells expressing KDR only, confirming the formation of such complexes. Furthermore, the formation of complexes containing KDR and NRP1 markedly increased 125I-VEGF165 binding to KDR. Our results suggest that formation of a ternary complex of VEGF165, KDR, and NRP1 potentiates VEGF165 binding to KDR. These complexes are formed on the surface of EC and in a juxtacrine manner via association of tumor cell NRP1 and EC KDR.     

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor II-derived peptides inhibit VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) directly stimulates endothelial cell proliferation and migration via tyrosine kinase receptors of the split kinase domain family. It mediates vascular growth and angiogenesis in the embryo but also in the adult in a variety of physiological and pathological conditions. The potential binding site of VEGF with its receptor was identified using cellulose-bound overlapping peptides of the extracytosolic part of the human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor II (VEGFR II). Thus, a peptide originating from the third globular domain of the VEGFR II comprising residues 247RTELNVGIDFNWEYP261 was revealed as contiguous sequence stretch, which bound 125I-VEGF165. A systematic replacement with L-amino acids within the peptide representing the putative VEGF-binding site on VEGFR II indicates Asp255 as the hydrophilic key residue for binding. The dimerized peptide (RTELNVGIDFNWEYPAS)2K inhibits VEGF165 binding with an IC50 of 0.5 microM on extracellular VEGFR II fragments and 30 microM on human umbilical vein cells. VEGF165-stimulated autophosphorylation of VEGFR II as well as proliferation and migration of microvascular endothelial cells was inhibited by the monomeric peptide RTELNVGIDFNWEYPASK at a half-maximal concentration of 3-10, 0.1, and 0.1 microM, respectively. We conclude that transduction of the VEGF165 signal can be interrupted with a peptide derived from the third Ig-like domain of VEGFR II by blockade of VEGF165 binding to its receptor.     

Autocrine VEGF signaling is required for vascular homeostasis

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is essential for developmental and pathological angiogenesis. Here we show that in the absence of any pathological insult, autocrine VEGF is required for the homeostasis of blood vessels in the adult. Genetic deletion of vegf specifically in the endothelial lineage leads to progressive endothelial degeneration and sudden death in 55% of mutant mice by 25 weeks of age. The phenotype is manifested without detectable changes in the total levels of VEGF mRNA or protein, indicating that paracrine VEGF could not compensate for the absence of endothelial VEGF. Furthermore, wild-type, but not VEGF null, endothelial cells showed phosphorylation of VEGFR2 in the absence of exogenous VEGF. Activation of the receptor in wild-type cells was suppressed by small molecule antagonists but not by extracellular blockade of VEGF. These results reveal a cell-autonomous VEGF signaling pathway that holds significance for vascular homeostasis but is dispensable for the angiogenic cascade.     

Heparan sulfate regulates VEGF165- and VEGF121-mediated vascular hyperpermeability

VEGF was first described as vascular permeability factor, a potent inducer of vascular leakage. Genetic evidence indicates that VEGF-stimulated endothelial proliferation in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo depend on heparan sulfate, but a requirement for heparan sulfate in vascular hyperpermeability has not been explored. Here we show that altering endothelial cell heparan sulfate biosynthesis in vivo decreases hyperpermeability induced by both VEGF(165) and VEGF(121). Because VEGF(121) does not bind heparan sulfate, the requirement for heparan sulfate suggested that it interacted with VEGF receptors rather than the ligand. By applying proximity ligation assays to primary brain endothelial cells, we show a direct interaction in situ between heparan sulfate and the VEGF receptor, VEGFR2. Furthermore, the number of heparan sulfate-VEGFR2 complexes increased in response to both VEGF(165) and VEGF(121). Genetic or heparin lyase-mediated alteration of endothelial heparan sulfate attenuated phosphorylation of VEGFR2 in response to VEGF(165) and VEGF(121), suggesting that the functional VEGF receptor complex contains heparan sulfate. Pharmacological blockade of heparan sulfate-protein interactions inhibited hyperpermeability in vivo, suggesting heparan sulfate as a potential target for treating hyperpermeability associated with ischemic disease.     

Low molecular weight fucoidan increases VEGF165-induced endothelial cell migration by enhancing VEGF165 binding to VEGFR-2 and NRP1

Therapeutic induction of angiogenesis is a potential treatment for chronic ischemia. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are known to play an important role by their interactions with proangiogenic growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Low molecular weight fucoidan (LMWF), a sulfated polysaccharide from brown seaweeds that mimic some biological activities of heparin, has been shown recently to promote revascularization in rat critical hindlimb ischemia. In this report, we first used cultured human endothelial cells (ECs) to investigate the possible ability of LMWF to enhance the actions of VEGF(165). Data showed that LMWF greatly enhances EC tube formation in growth factor reduced matrigel. LMWF is a strong enhancer of VEGF(165)-induced EC chemotaxis, but not proliferation. In addition, LMWF has no effect on VEGF(121)-induced EC migration, a VEGF isoform that does not bind to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Then, with binding studies using (125)I-VEGF(165), we observed that LMWF enhances the binding of VEGF(165) to recombinant VEGFR-2 and Neuropilin-1 (NRP1), but not to VEGFR-1. Surface plasmon resonance analysis showed that LMWF binds with high affinity to VEGF(165) (1.2 nm) and its receptors (5-20 nm), but not to VEGF(121). Pre-injection of LMWF on immobilized receptors shows that VEGF(165) has the highest affinity for VEGFR-2 and NRP1, as compared with VEGFR-1. Overall, the effects of LMWF were much more pronounced than those of LMW heparin. These findings suggested an efficient mechanism of action of LMWF by promoting VEGF(165) binding to VEGFR-2 and NRP1 on ECs that could help in stimulating therapeutic revascularization.     

Skeletal muscle VEGF gradients in peripheral arterial disease: simulations of rest and exercise

VEGF is a key promoter of angiogenesis and a major target of proangiogenic therapy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Greater understanding of VEGF angiogenic signaling and guidance by gradients for new capillaries will aid in developing new proangiogenic therapies and improving existing treatments. However, in vivo measurements of VEGF concentration gradients at the cell scale are currently impossible. We have developed a computational model to quantify VEGF distribution in extensor digitorum longus skeletal muscle using measurements of VEGF, VEGF receptor (VEGFR), and neuropilin-1 (NRP1) expression in an experimental model of rat PAD. VEGF is secreted by myocytes, diffuses through and interacts with extracellular matrix and basement membranes, and binds VEGFRs and NRP1 on endothelial cell surfaces of blood vessels. We simulate the effects of increased NRP1 expression and of therapeutic exercise training on VEGF gradients, receptor signaling, and angiogenesis. Our study predicts that angiogenic therapy for PAD may be achieved not only through VEGF upregulation but also through modulation of VEGFRs and NRP1. We predict that expression of 10(4) NRP1/cell can increase VEGF binding to receptors by 1.7-fold (vs. no NRP1); in nonexercise-trained muscle with PAD, angiogenesis is hindered due to limited VEGF upregulation, signaling, and gradients; in exercise-trained muscle, VEGF signaling is enhanced by upregulation of VEGFRs and NRP1, and VEGF signaling is strongest within the first week of exercise therapy; and hypoxia-induced VEGF release is important to direct angiogenesis towards unperfused tissue.     

Distinct heparin binding sites on VEGF165 and its receptors revealed by their interaction with a non sulfated glycoaminoglycan (NaPaC)

We previously demonstrated that a non sulfated analogue of heparin, phenylacetate carboxymethyl benzylamide dextran (NaPaC) inhibited angiogenesis. Here, we observed that NaPaC inhibited the VEGF165 binding to both VEGFR2 and NRP-1 and abolished VEGFR2 activity. Further, we explored the effects of NaPaC on VEGF165 interactions with its receptors, VEGFR2 and NRP-1, co-receptor of VEGFR2. Surface plasmon resonance and affinity gel electrophoresis showed that NaPaC interacted directly with VEGF165, VEGFR2 and NRP-1 but not with heparin-independent factor such as VEGF121. NaPaC completely inhibited the heparin binding to VEGF165, NRP-1 and VEGFR2. We found that NaPaC bound to all three molecules, VEGF165, VEGFR2 and NRP-1, but was more effective in inhibiting heparin binding to VEGF165. These results suggested that heparin binding sites of VEGFR2 and NRP-1 were different from those of VEGF165.     

VEGF binding to NRP1 is essential for VEGF stimulation of endothelial cell migration, complex formation between NRP1 and VEGFR2, and signaling via FAK Tyr407 phosphorylation

In endothelial cells, neuropilin-1 (NRP1) binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and is thought to act as a coreceptor for kinase insert domain-containing receptor (KDR) by associating with KDR and enhancing VEGF signaling. Here we report mutations in the NRP1 b1 domain (Y297A and D320A), which result in complete loss of VEGF binding. Overexpression of Y297A and D320A NRP1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells reduced high-affinity VEGF binding and migration toward a VEGF gradient, and markedly inhibited VEGF-induced angiogenesis in a coculture cell model. The Y297A NRP1 mutant also disrupted complexation between NRP1 and KDR and decreased VEGF-dependent phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase at Tyr407, but had little effect on other signaling pathways. Y297A NRP1, however, heterodimerized with wild-type NRP1 and NRP2 indicating that nonbinding NRP1 mutants can act in a dominant-negative manner through formation of NRP1 dimers with reduced binding affinity for VEGF. These findings indicate that VEGF binding to NRP1 has specific effects on endothelial cell signaling and is important for endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis mediated via complex formation between NRP1 and KDR and increased signaling to focal adhesions. Identification of key residues essential for VEGF binding and biological functions provides the basis for a rational design of antagonists of VEGF binding to NRP1.     

Role of VEGF in organogenesis

The cardiovascular system, consisting of the heart, blood vessels and hematopoietic cells, is the first organ system to develop in vertebrates and is essential for providing oxygen and nutrients to the embryo and adult organs. Work done predominantly using the mouse and zebrafish as model systems has demonstrated that Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF, also known as VEGFA) and its receptors KDR (FLK1/VEGFR2), FLT1 (VEGFR1), NRP1 and NRP2 play essential roles in many different aspects of cardiovascular development, including endothelial cell differentiation, migration and survival as well as heart formation and hematopoiesis. This review will summarize the approaches taken and conclusions reached in dissecting the role of VEGF signalling in vivo during the development of the early cardiovasculature and other organ systems. The VEGF-mediated assembly of a functional vasculature is also a prerequisite for the proper formation of other organs and for tissue homeostasis, because blood vessels deliver oxygen and nutrients and vascular endothelium provides inductive signals to other tissues. Particular emphasis will therefore be placed in this review on the cellular interactions between vascular endothelium and developing organ systems, in addition to a discussion of the role of VEGF in modulating the behavior of nonendothelial cell populations.Key words: VEGF, VEGF receptors, organogenesis, mouse, angiogenesis, cardiovascular, conditional mutagenesis, Cre-loxP system     

Analysis of a zebrafish VEGF receptor mutant reveals specific disruption of angiogenesis

Blood vessels form either by the assembly and differentiation of mesodermal precursor cells (vasculogenesis) or by sprouting from preexisting vessels (angiogenesis). Endothelial-specific receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands are known to be essential for these processes. Targeted disruption of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptor kdr (flk1, VEGFR2) in mouse embryos results in a severe reduction of all blood vessels, while the complete loss of flt1 (VEGFR1) leads to an increased number of hemangioblasts and a disorganized vasculature. In a large-scale forward genetic screen, we identified two allelic zebrafish mutants in which the sprouting of blood vessels is specifically disrupted without affecting the assembly and differentiation of angioblasts. Molecular cloning revealed nonsense mutations in flk1. Analysis of mRNA expression in flk1 mutant embryos showed that flk1 expression was severely downregulated, while the expression of other genes (scl, gata1, and fli1) involved in vasculogenesis or hematopoiesis was unchanged. Overexpression of vegf(121+165) led to the formation of additional vessels only in sibling larvae, not in flk1 mutants. We demonstrate that flk1 is not required for proper vasculogenesis and hematopoiesis in zebrafish embryos. However, the disruption of flk1 impairs the formation or function of vessels generated by sprouting angiogenesis.     

Transforming growth factor‐beta 1 (TGF‐β1) induces angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)‐mediated apoptosis

VEGF and TGF‐β1 induce angiogenesis but have opposing effects on endothelial cells. VEGF protects endothelial cells from apoptosis; TGF‐β1 induces apoptosis. We have previously shown that VEGF/VEGF receptor‐2 (VEGFR2) signaling mediates TGF‐β1 induction of apoptosis. This finding raised an important question: Does this mechanism stimulate or inhibit angiogenesis? Here we report that VEGF‐mediated apoptosis is required for TGF‐β1 induction of angiogenesis. In vitro the apoptotic effect of TGF‐β1 on endothelial cells is rapid and followed by a long period in which the cells are refractory to apoptosis induction by TGF‐β1. Inhibition of VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling abrogates formation of cord‐like structures by TGF‐β1 with an effect comparable to that of z‐VAD, an apoptosis inhibitor. Similarly, genetic deficiency of VEGF abolishes TGF‐β1 upregulation of endothelial cell differentiation and formation of vascular structures in embryoid bodies. In vivo TGF‐β1 induces endothelial cell apoptosis as rapidly as in vitro. Inhibition of VEGF blocks TGF‐β1 induction of both apoptosis and angiogenesis, an effect similar to that of z‐VAD. Thus, TGF‐β1 induction of angiogenesis requires a rapid and transient apoptotic effect mediated by VEGF/VEGFR2. This novel, unexpected role of VEGF and VEGFR2 indicates VEGF‐mediated apoptosis as a potential target to control angiogenesis. J. Cell. Physiol. 219: 449–458, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The recombinant kringle domain of urokinase plasminogen activator inhibits VEGF165-induced angiogenesis of HUVECs by suppressing VEGFR2 dimerization and subsequent signal transduction

The recombinant kringle domain (UK1) of urokinase plasminogen activator was previously reported to exert antiangiogenic activity against Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-induced angiogenesis in both in vitro and in vivo models. In this study, we explored the molecular signaling mechanisms involved in the antiangiogenic activity of UK1 by examining VEGF signaling proteins. VEGF165 stimulates the phosphorylation of VEGF signaling molecules, and pretreatment with UK1 blocked VEGF-induced signal transduction associated with proliferation, survival, and migration. UK1 also suppressed VEGF165-induced activation of MMP-2. Moreover, UK1 suppressed the phosphorylation and activation of VEGFR2 in VEGF-stimulated human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by blocking the dimerization of VEGFR2. Overall, our findings suggest that UK1 inhibits VEGF-induced proliferation, migration, and matrix metalloproteinase activity of HUVECs by suppressing VEGFR2 dimerization and subsequent angiogenic signals.     

Chorioallantoic placenta formation in the rat: II. Angiogenesis and maternal blood circulation in the mesometrial region of the implantation chamber prior to placenta formation.

Rat gestation sites were examined on days 7 through 9 of pregnancy by light microscopy and transmission and scanning electron microscopy to determine the extent of vascular modifications in the vicinity of the mesometrial part of the implantation chamber (mesometrial chamber). At a later time, the mesometrial chamber is, in conjunction with the uterine lumen, the site of chorioallantoic placenta formation. On day 7, in the vicinity of the mesometrial chamber, vessels derived from a subepithelial capillary plexus and venules draining the plexus were dilating. By early day 8, this network of thin-walled dilated vessels (sinusoids) was further enlarged and consisted primarily of hypertrophied endothelial cells with indistinct basal laminas. Sinusoids were frequently close to the mesometrial chamber's luminal surface which was devoid of epithelial cells but was lined by decidual cell processes and extracellular matrix. By late day 8, cytoplasmic projections of endothelial cells extended between healthy-appearing decidual cells and out onto the mesometrial chamber's luminal surface, and endothelial cells were sometimes found on the luminal surface indicating that endothelial cells were migrating. The presence of maternal blood cells in the mesometrial chamber lumen suggested that there was continuity between the chamber and blood-vessel lumens. On day 9, the mesometrial chamber was completely lined with hypertrophied endothelial cells, and sinusoid lumens were clearly continuous with the lumen of the mesometrial chamber. Mesometrial sinusoids and possibly the mesometrial chamber lumen were continuous with vessels in vicinity of the uterine lumen that were fed by mesometrial arterial vessels. Clearing of the mesometrial chamber lumen during perfusion fixation via the maternal vasculature indicated the patency of this luminal space and its confluence with mesometrial arterial vessels and sinusoids. The conceptus occupied an antimesometrial position in the implantation chamber on days 7 through 9, and it was not in direct contact with uterine tissues in the vicinity of the mesometrial chamber. These observations suggest that angiogenesis, not trophoblast invasion or decidual cell death, plays a major role in the opening of maternal vessels into the mesometrial chamber lumen before the formation of the chorioallantoic placenta.     

Neuropilin-1 mediates collapsin-1/semaphorin III inhibition of endothelial cell motility: functional competition of collapsin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-165.

Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) is a receptor for two unrelated ligands with disparate activities, vascular endothelial growth factor-165 (VEGF165), an angiogenesis factor, and semaphorin/collapsins, mediators of neuronal guidance. To determine whether semaphorin/collapsins could interact with NRP1 in nonneuronal cells, the effects of recombinant collapsin-1 on endothelial cells (EC) were examined. Collapsin-1 inhibited the motility of porcine aortic EC (PAEC) expressing NRP1 alone; coexpressing KDR and NRP1 (PAEC/KDR/NRP1), but not parental PAEC; or PAEC expressing KDR alone. The motility of PAEC expressing NRP1 was inhibited by 65-75% and this inhibition was abrogated by anti-NRP1 antibody. In contrast, VEGF165 stimulated the motility of PAEC/KDR/NRP1. When VEGF165 and collapsin-1 were added simultaneously to PAEC/KDR/NRP1, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and COS-7/NRP1 cells, they competed with each other in EC motility, DRG collapse, and NRP1-binding assays, respectively, suggesting that the two ligands have overlapping NRP1 binding sites. Collapsin-1 rapidly disrupted the formation of lamellipodia and induced depolymerization of F-actin in an NRP1-dependent manner. In an in vitro angiogenesis assay, collapsin-1 inhibited the capillary sprouting of EC from rat aortic ring segments. These results suggest that collapsin-1 can inhibit EC motility as well as axon motility, that these inhibitory effects on motility are mediated by NRP1, and that VEGF165 and collapsin-1 compete for NRP1-binding sites.