Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein E Mediates Retrograde Spread from Epithelial Cells to Neurites

In animal models of infection, glycoprotein E (gE) is required for efficient herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (retrograde direction). Retrograde spread in vivo is a multistep process, in that HSV-1 first spreads between epithelial cells at the inoculation site, then infects neurites, and finally travels by retrograde axonal transport to the neuron cell body. To better understand the role of gE in retrograde spread, we used a compartmentalized neuron culture system, in which neurons were infected in the presence or absence of epithelial cells. We found that gE-deleted HSV-1 (NS-gEnull) retained retrograde axonal transport activity when added directly to neurites, in contrast to the retrograde spread defect of this virus in animals. To better mimic the in vivo milieu, we overlaid neurites with epithelial cells prior to infection. In this modified system, virus infects epithelial cells and then spreads to neurites, revealing a 100-fold retrograde spread defect for NS-gEnull. We measured the retrograde spread defect of NS-gEnull from a variety of epithelial cell lines and found that the magnitude of the spread defect from epithelial cells to neurons correlated with epithelial cell plaque size defect, indicating that gE plays a similar role in both types of spread. Therefore, gE-mediated spread between epithelial cells and neurites likely explains the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in vivo.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is an alphaherpesvirus that characteristically infects skin and mucosal surfaces before spreading to sensory neurons, where it establishes a lifelong persistent infection. The virus periodically returns to the periphery via sensory axons and causes recurrent lesions as well as asymptomatic shedding. This life cycle requires viral transport along axons in two directions: toward the neuron cell body (retrograde direction) and away from the neuron cell body (anterograde direction).Many studies of alphaherpesvirus neuronal spread have focused on pseudorabies virus (PRV), a virus whose natural host is the pig. Three PRV proteins, glycoprotein E (gE), gI, and Us9, have been shown to mediate anterograde neuronal spread both in animal models of infection and in cultured neurons. However, these three proteins are dispensable for retrograde spread (3, 8, 11, 12, 31, 46). In contrast, numerous animal models of infection have shown that HSV-1 gE is required for retrograde spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (4, 9, 44, 56). In the murine flank model, wild-type (WT) virus replicates in the skin and then infects sensory neurons and spreads in a retrograde direction to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). In this model, gE-deleted HSV-1 replicates in the skin but is not detected in the DRG (9, 44). This phenotype differs from gE-deleted PRV, which is able to reach the DRG at WT levels (8). Thus, unlike PRV, gE-deleted HSV-1 viruses have a retrograde spread defect in vivo.HSV-1 gE is a 552-amino-acid type I membrane protein found in the virion membrane as well as in the trans-Golgi and plasma membranes of infected cells (1). gE forms a heterodimer with another viral glycoprotein, gI. The gE/gI complex is important for HSV-1 immune evasion through its Fc receptor activity. gE/gI binds to the Fc domain of antibodies directed against other viral proteins, sequestering these antibodies and blocking antibody effector functions (27, 32, 40). Additionally, gE/gI promotes spread between epithelial cells. Viruses lacking either gE or gI form characteristically small plaques in cell culture and small inoculation site lesions in mice (4, 9, 18, 40, 58). In animal models, gE and gI also mediate viral spread in both anterograde and retrograde directions (4, 19, 44, 56).In order to better understand the role of gE in HSV-1 retrograde neuronal spread, we employed a compartmentalized neuron culture system that has been used to study directional neuronal spread of PRV and West Nile virus (12, 14, 45). In the Campenot chamber system, neurites are contained in a compartment that is separate from their corresponding cell bodies. Therefore, spread in an exclusively retrograde direction can be measured by infecting neurites and detecting spread to neuron cell bodies.HSV-1 replication requires retrograde transport of incoming viral genomes to the nucleus. In neurites, fusion between viral and cellular membranes occurs at the plasma membrane (43, 48). Upon membrane fusion, the capsid and a subset of tegument proteins (the inner tegument) dissociate from glycoproteins and outer tegument proteins, which remain at the plasma membrane (28, 38). Unenveloped capsids and the associated inner tegument proteins are then transported in the retrograde direction to the nucleus (7, 48, 49).For both neurons and epithelial cells, retrograde transport is dependent upon microtubules, ATP, the retrograde microtubule motor dynein, and the dynein cofactor dynactin (22, 34, 49, 52). Several viral proteins interact with components of the dynein motor complex (23, 39, 60). However, none of these proteins suggest a completely satisfactory mechanism by which viral retrograde transport occurs, either because they are not components of the complex that is transported to the nucleus (UL34, UL9, VP11/12) or because capsids lacking that protein retain retrograde transport activity (VP26) (2, 17, 21, 28, 37). This implies that additional viral proteins are involved in retrograde trafficking.We sought to better characterize the role of gE in retrograde spread and found that gE is dispensable for retrograde axonal transport; however, it promotes HSV-1 spread from epithelial cells to neurites. This epithelial cell-to-neuron spread defect provides a plausible explanation for the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in animal models of infection.     

Processing of Lagging-Strand Intermediates In Vitro by Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA Polymerase

The processing of lagging-strand intermediates has not been demonstrated in vitro for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Human flap endonuclease-1 (Fen-1) was examined for its ability to produce ligatable products with model lagging-strand intermediates in the presence of the wild-type or exonuclease-deficient (exo⁻) HSV-1 DNA polymerase (pol). Primer/templates were composed of a minicircle single-stranded DNA template annealed to primers that contained 5′ DNA flaps or 5′ annealed DNA or RNA sequences. Gapped DNA primer/templates were extended but not significantly strand displaced by the wild-type HSV-1 pol, although significant strand displacement was observed with exo⁻ HSV-1 pol. Nevertheless, the incubation of primer/templates containing 5′ flaps with either wild-type or exo⁻ HSV-1 pol and Fen-1 led to the efficient production of nicks that could be sealed with DNA ligase I. Both polymerases stimulated the nick translation activity of Fen-1 on DNA- or RNA-containing primer/templates, indicating that the activities were coordinated. Further evidence for Fen-1 involvement in HSV-1 DNA synthesis is suggested by the ability of a transiently expressed green fluorescent protein fusion with Fen-1 to accumulate in viral DNA replication compartments in infected cells and by the ability of endogenous Fen-1 to coimmunoprecipitate with an essential viral DNA replication protein in HSV-1-infected cells.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), the prototypic member of the family of Herpesviridae and that of the alphaherpesviridae subfamily, has served as the model for understanding the replication of herpesvirus genomes during lytic virus replication (29). The 152-kbp genome of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) possesses approximately 85 genes, 7 of which have been shown to be necessary and sufficient for viral DNA replication within host cells (reviewed in references 5 and 38). These seven genes encode a DNA polymerase (pol) and its processivity factor (UL42), a heterotrimeric complex containing a DNA helicase (UL5), primase (UL52), and noncatalytic accessory protein (UL8), a single-stranded DNA binding protein (infected cell protein 8 [ICP-8]), and an origin binding protein with DNA helicase activity (UL9). There is strong evidence in support of the circularization of the linear virion DNA shortly after entry, and DNA replication then is thought to initiate at one or more of the three redundant origins of replication (29, 38). At least in the earliest stages of viral DNA replication, UL9 protein is required, presumably to bind to and unwind the DNA and to attract the other DNA replication proteins (29, 38). The electron microscopic examination of pulse-labeled replicating HSV-1 DNA indicates the presence of lariats, eye-forms, and D-forms (21), which is consistent with bidirectional theta-like replication from origins. To date, however, no biochemical assay has demonstrated origin-dependent DNA replication in vitro. However, in the absence of UL9, the other six HSV DNA replication proteins can support initiation and replication from a circular single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) template in an origin-independent fashion (15, 26), resembling the rolling-circle mode of replication thought to occur during the later stages of viral replication.Although nicks and small gaps have been observed in isolated replicating and virion DNA (38), the evidence for bidirectional duplex synthesis, the rapid rate of viral DNA replication, and the absence of long stretches of ssDNA in replicating and mature DNA isolated from HSV-1-infected cells suggest that leading- and lagging-strand synthesis are closely coordinated in vivo. Falkenberg et al. (15) used a minicircle DNA template with a strand bias and the six essential HSV-1 DNA replication proteins needed for rolling circle replication to demonstrate lagging-strand synthesis in vitro. However, replication from the parental strand template (leading-strand synthesis) was more efficient than synthesis from the complementary-strand template (lagging-strand synthesis). These results suggest the possibility that one or more host functions required for efficient lagging-strand synthesis or for its close coordination with leading-strand synthesis is missing in such in vitro systems.Although leading- and lagging-strand syntheses share many of the same requirements for bulk DNA synthesis, lagging-strand synthesis is a more complex process. Because the direction of polymerization of lagging-strand intermediates is opposite the direction of replication fork movement, lagging-strand synthesis requires that priming and extension occur many times to produce discontinuous segments called Okazaki fragments (reviewed in reference 25). Okazaki fragments need to be processed to remove the RNA primer, to fill in the area previously occupied by the RNA, and to seal the remaining nick between fragments, all of which must occur efficiently, accurately, and completely. Failure to do so would result in the accumulation of DNA breaks, multiple mutations, delayed DNA replication, and/or cell death (16, 61).In eukaryotes, what is currently known regarding the process of lagging-strand synthesis is based on genetic and biochemical studies with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and on in vitro reconstitution studies to define the mammalian enzymes required for simian virus 40 (SV40) T-antigen-dependent DNA replication (17, 37, 44, 57, 58). These studies have revealed that the extension of a newly synthesized Okazaki fragment DNA with pol δ causes the strand displacement of the preceding fragment to produce a 5′ flap (25). Results suggest that flap endonuclease 1 (Fen-1) is the activity responsible for the removal of the bulk of the 5′ flaps generated (1, 44, 48), although dna2 protein may facilitate the removal of longer flaps coated with the ssDNA binding protein complex (2, 44). In addition, the overexpression of exonuclease I can partially compensate for the loss of Fen-1 function in yeast (24, 51). For the proper processing of lagging-strand intermediates, the entire 5′ flap and all of the RNA primer need to be removed, and the gap must be filled to achieve a ligatable nick. DNA ligase I has been shown to be the enzyme involved in sealing Okazaki fragments in yeast and in humans (3, 31, 50, 56, 57). DNA ligase I requires a nick in which there is a 5′ phosphate on one end and a 3′ hydroxyl linked to a deoxyribose sugar entity on the other, and it works poorly in the presence of mismatches (54). The close coordination of Fen-1 and DNA ligase I activities for Okazaki fragment processing is facilitated by the interactions of these proteins with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the processivity factor for pol δ and ɛ (6, 30, 32, 46, 52, 53).HSV-1 does not appear to encode a protein with DNA ligase activity or one that can specifically cleave 5′ flaps, although it does encode a 5′-to-3′ exonuclease activity (UL12 [10, 20]) and a 3′-to-5′ exonuclease activity that is part of the HSV-1 pol catalytic subunit (27). As for most eukaryotes, RNA primers are essential for HSV-1 DNA synthesis, as demonstrated by the presence of oligoribonucleotides in replicating DNA in vivo (4), by the well-characterized ability of the UL52 protein in complex with the UL5 helicase activity to synthesize oligoribonucleotide primers on ssDNA in vitro (11, 13), and by the requirement of the conserved catalytic residues in the UL52 primase in vitro and in HSV-1-infected cells (14, 26). It is the strand displacement activity of pol δ that produces the 5′ flaps that are key to the removal of RNA primers during Okazaki fragment processing (6, 25). However, we previously demonstrated that wild-type HSV-1 DNA polymerase possesses poor strand displacement activity (62), in contrast to mammalian DNA pol δ (25). Thus, it is not apparent how RNA primers would be removed when encountered by HSV-1 pol during HSV-1 lagging-strand synthesis or how such intermediates would be processed.We wished to test the hypothesis that the nick translation activity of mammalian Fen-1 could function in collaboration with HSV-1 pol to facilitate the proper removal of RNA primers and/or short flaps to produce the ligatable products required for Okazaki fragment processing. In this report, we have examined the ability of wild-type and exonuclease-deficient (exo⁻) HSV-1 pol, which differ in their respective strand displacement activities, to extend model lagging-strand substrates in the presence or absence of mammalian Fen-1. Our results demonstrate that both wild-type and exo⁻ HSV-1 pol can cooperate with and enhance Fen-1 activity to achieve a ligatable nick in vitro. Moreover, colocalization and coimmunoprecipitation studies reveal a physical association of Fen-1 with HSV-1 DNA replication proteins, supporting a model for the involvement of Fen-1 in HSV-1 DNA replication.     

Differences in the Regulatory and Functional Effects of the Us3 Protein Kinase Activities of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and 2

Us3 protein kinases encoded by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2) are serine/threonine protein kinases and play critical roles in viral replication and pathogenicity in vivo. In the present study, we investigated differences in the biological properties of HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases and demonstrated that HSV-2 Us3 did not have some of the HSV-1 Us3 kinase functions, including control of nuclear egress of nucleocapsids, localization of UL31 and UL34, and cell surface expression of viral envelope glycoprotein B. In agreement with the observations that HSV-2 Us3 was less important for these functions, the effect of HSV-2 Us3 kinase activity on virulence in mice following intracerebral inoculation was much lower than that of HSV-1 Us3. Furthermore, we showed that alanine substitution in HSV-2 Us3 at a site (aspartic acid at position 147) corresponding to one that can be autophosphorylated in HSV-1 Us3 abolished HSV-2 Us3 kinase activity. Thus, the regulatory and functional effects of Us3 kinase activity are different between HSV-1 and HSV-2.Us3 protein kinases encoded by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2) are serine/threonine protein kinases with amino acid sequences that are conserved in the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae (6, 24, 36). Based on studies showing that recombinant Us3 mutants of HSV-1 and HSV-2 have significantly impaired viral replication and virulence in mice models, it has been concluded that both HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases play important roles in viral replication and pathogenicity in vivo (25, 33, 41). In contrast, HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases are not essential for growth in tissue culture cells (33, 36). Thus, recombinant Us3 mutants grow as well as wild-type viruses in Vero cells, and the mutants exhibit modestly impaired replication in HEp-2 cells (33, 36, 39, 40). The possible functions of Us3 have been extensively studied and gradually elucidated for HSV-1 Us3, but much less is known about HSV-2 Us3. These functions include (i) blocking apoptosis (1, 22, 30, 31, 35); (ii) promoting nuclear egress of progeny nucleocapsids through the nuclear membrane (39, 40, 45); (iii) redistributing and phosphorylating nuclear membrane-associated viral nuclear egress factors UL31 and UL34 (14, 37, 38) and cellular proteins, including lamin A/C and emerin (21, 27, 28); (iv) controlling infected cell morphology (13, 31, 32); and (v) downregulating cell surface expression of viral envelope glycoprotein B (gB) (12).To determine the molecular mechanisms for a viral protein kinase''s effects in infected cells, the kinase''s physiological substrates and its phosphorylation sites must be identified. This can involve studies showing that the altered phenotypes observed in cells infected with a mutant virus lacking the protein kinase activity is also detected in cells infected with a mutant virus in which the substrate''s phosphorylation sites have been modified by mutations. Although more than 15 potential HSV Us3 substrates have been reported, HSV-1 Us3 phosphorylation of only three substrates (Us3 itself, gB, and UL31) has been demonstrated to be linked directly with Us3 functions in infected cells (12, 13, 29, 41) as follows. (i) Us3 has been reported to autophosphorylate serine at position 147 (Ser-147), and this phosphorylation augments Us3''s kinase activity in infected cells (13, 41). Even though only a small fraction of Us3 is autophosphorylated at Ser-147 in infected cells, alanine replacement of Ser-147 in Us3 significantly reduced HSV-1 replication in the mouse cornea and pathogenic manifestations of herpes stroma keratitis and periocular skin disease in mice (41). These results indicated that Us3 kinase activity was, in part, regulated by autophosphorylation of Ser-147, and regulation of Us3 activity by autophosphorylation played a critical role in viral replication in vivo and HSV-1 pathogenesis. (ii) It has been reported that HSV-1 Us3 phosphorylates Thr-887 in the cytoplasmic tail of gB, and this phosphorylation downregulates the cell surface expression of gB (12). Us3 phosphorylation of gB at Thr-887 also has been proposed to be involved in the regulation of fusion of the nascent progeny virion envelope with the cell''s outer nuclear membrane, based on the observation that virions accumulated aberrantly in the perinuclear space in cells infected with mutant viruses carrying the amino acid substitution mutation T887A in gB and lacking the capacity to produce gH (45). The Us3 phosphorylation of gB at Thr-887 appeared to be critical for HSV-1 replication and pathogenesis in vivo, based on studies showing that the T887A substitution in the phosphorylation site in gB significantly reduced viral replication in the mouse cornea and pathogenic manifestations of herpes stroma keratitis and periocular skin disease in mice (Takahiko Imai, Ken Sagou, and Yasushi Kawaguchi, unpublished observations). (iii) It has been shown that Us3 phosphorylated some or all of the six serines in the UL31 N-terminal region, and this phosphorylation regulated the proper localization of UL31 and UL34 at the nuclear membrane and nuclear egress of nucleocapsids (29). Thus, the molecular basis of HSV-1 Us3 effects in infected cells have been gradually elucidated.However, the Us3 phosphorylation sites in Us3 itself and in gB are not conserved between HSV serotypes (12, 13). The amino acid residues in HSV-2 Us3 and gB corresponding to HSV-1 Us3 Ser-147 and gB Thr-887 are aspartic acid (Asp-147) and alanine (Ala-887), respectively. These results suggest that some HSV-1 Us3 functions, such as regulation of its own catalytic activity and control of gB expression on the cell surface, are not regulated by HSV-2 Us3 or are regulated in a manner(s) different from HSV-1 Us3. In agreement with this suggestion, there is a marked difference between HSV-1 and HSV-2 virulence in mice following intracerebral infection, with the HSV-1 Us3 null mutant being >10⁴-fold less virulent than the parent wild-type virus (25), while the HSV-2 Us3 null mutant was only ∼10-fold less virulent (33). Although these results were from different reports and the mouse strains used in the studies were different, they indicate that some HSV-1 Us3 functions are different from those of HSV-2 Us3.Therefore, we investigated differences in the biological properties of HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases. It was of particular interest to examine whether Asp-147 in HSV-2 Us3 is required for its own kinase activity, since it is well established that acidic amino acids such as Asp or glutamic acid sometimes mimic the negative charges produced by phosphorylation (29, 46). In the present study, using a genetic manipulation system of HSV-2 with our newly constructed HSV-2 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone, we have shown that HSV-2 Us3 exhibited marked differences from HSV-1 Us3 in its catalytic functions, including the regulation of UL31/UL34 localization, nuclear egress of nucleocapsids, cell surface expression of gB, and virulence in mice. We also found that Asp-147 in HSV-2 Us3 was critical for its kinase activity, raising a possibility that the activity of Us3 kinases was regulated differently in HSV-1 and HSV-2.     

Early Innate Recognition of Herpes Simplex Virus in Human Primary Macrophages Is Mediated via the MDA5/MAVS-Dependent and MDA5/MAVS/RNA Polymerase III-Independent Pathways

Innate recognition of viruses is mediated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) triggering expression of antiviral interferons (IFNs) and proinflammatory cytokines. In mice, Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR9 as well as intracellular nucleotide-sensing pathways have been shown to recognize herpes simplex virus (HSV). Here, we describe how human primary macrophages recognize early HSV infection via intracellular pathways. A number of inflammatory cytokines, IFNs, and IFN-stimulated genes were upregulated after HSV infection. We show that early recognition of HSV and induction of IFNs and inflammatory cytokines are independent of TLR2 and TLR9, since inhibition of TLR2 using TLR2 neutralizing antibodies did not affect virus-induced responses and the macrophages were unresponsive to TLR9 stimulation. Instead, HSV recognition involves intracellular recognition systems, since induction of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and IFNs was dependent on virus entry and replication. Importantly, expression of IFNs was strongly inhibited by small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of MAVS, but this MAVS-dependent IFN induction occurred independently of the recently discovered polymerase III (Pol III)/RIG-I DNA sensing system. In contrast, induction of TNF-α was largely independent of MAVS, suggesting that induction of inflammatory cytokines during HSV infection proceeds via a novel pathway. Transfection with ODN2006, a broad inhibitor of intracellular nucleotide recognition, revealed that nucleotide-sensing systems are employed to induce both IFNs and TNF-α. Finally, using siRNA knockdown, we found that MDA5, but not RIG-I, was the primary mediator of HSV recognition. Thus, innate recognition of HSV by human primary macrophages occurs via two distinct intracellular nucleotide-sensing pathways responsible for induction of IFNs and inflammatory cytokine expression, respectively.Virus recognition is essential for activation of innate antiviral immune defense and the subsequent induction of acquired immunity. Conserved pathogen motifs, termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Virus-recognizing PRRs include Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), and a number of intracellular DNA receptors. Several TLRs have been attributed roles in the recognition of virus. TLR2 and TLR4 recognize viral surface structures (3, 6, 18, 31), TLR3 recognizes double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) (2), and TLR7/8 and TLR9 function as signaling receptors for viral single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) (8, 11, 21) and CpG DNA (12, 20), respectively.Within the cell, cytoplasmic RLRs RIG-I and MDA5 both recognize accumulation of virus-derived dsRNA; in addition, RIG-I recognizes 5′-triphosphated RNA (14, 27, 39, 40). In addition to the RLRs, a number of receptors recognize foreign DNA. Presently, three DNA receptors have been identified: Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP-1, or DAI) (36) and RNA polymerase III (Pol III) (1, 4) both mediate interferon (IFN) and cytokine production, whereas the AIM2 inflammasome is involved in caspase 1 activation in response to cytoplasmic dsDNA (13).Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 are two closely related human DNA viruses associated with a number of serious diseases, including orofacial infections, encephalitis, and genital infections (34). Macrophages play an important role in the first line of defense against viral infection via production of IFNs, cytokines, and chemokines that regulate the progress of the virus infection and activate and support appropriate defense mechanisms (9, 10, 24).TLR2, TLR3, and TLR9 have been identified as mediators of proinflammatory cytokine production during HSV infections. TLR2 mediates an overzealous inflammatory cytokine response following HSV-1 infection in mice, promoting mononuclear cell infiltration of the brain and development of encephalitis (18). TLR3 mediates type I and III IFN production in human fibroblasts (41). TLR9 recognizes genomic DNA from HSV-1 and HSV-2 in murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs) (17, 20) and mediates tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and CCL5 production in murine macrophages (22). Both TLR2 and TLR9 mediate recognition of HSV and cytokine production in murine conventional DCs (35). HSV is recognized by an RLR/MAVS-dependent mechanism in murine macrophages and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (5, 29, 30). Recent data suggest that RNA Pol III mediates IFN production following HSV-1 infection and transfection with HSV-1 DNA in macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells (4). Finally, murine L929 fibroblast-like cells are moderately inhibited in their ability to produce IFN after HSV-1 infection when ZBP-1 is knocked down (19, 36). Thus, several PRRs have been reported to recognize HSV-1 in murine cells and different cell lines, but the pathways responsible for sensing this virus in human primary macrophages and their impact on cytokine expression have not previously been described.In this work, we investigate the recognition pathways underlying HSV-induced cytokine and chemokine expression in human primary macrophages. We demonstrate that HSV-1-induced IFN and cytokine expression is independent of TLR2 and TLR9 but highly dependent on virus replication and intracellular nucleotide recognition systems. Specifically, induction of IFNs is dependent on MAVS and MDA5, whereas TNF-α is induced by a novel intracellular nucleotide-sensing system.     

Retrograde Axon Transport of Herpes Simplex Virus and Pseudorabies Virus: a Live-Cell Comparative Analysis

Upon entry, neuroinvasive herpesviruses traffic from axon terminals to the nuclei of neurons resident in peripheral ganglia, where the viral DNA is deposited. A detailed analysis of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) transport dynamics in axons following entry is currently lacking. Here, time lapse fluorescence microscopy was used to compare the postentry viral transport of two neurotropic herpesviruses: HSV-1 and pseudorabies virus (PRV). HSV-1 capsid transport dynamics were indistinguishable from those of PRV and did not differ in neurons of human, mouse, or avian origin. Simultaneous tracking of capsids and tegument proteins demonstrated that the composition of actively transporting HSV-1 is remarkably similar to that of PRV. This quantitative assessment of HSV-1 axon transport following entry demonstrates that HSV-1 and PRV share a conserved mechanism for postentry retrograde transport in axons and provides the foundation for further studies of the retrograde transport process.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and the veterinary herpesvirus pathogen pseudorabies virus (PRV) establish latent infections within the peripheral nervous systems (PNS) of their hosts. Neurotropic herpesviruses gain access to the PNS at nerve endings present in infected skin or mucosal tissue. Upon entry at the nerve terminal, viral particles are transported in axons toward the neuronal cell body to ultimately deposit the viral genome into the nucleus. This process is referred to as retrograde transport and is critical for the establishment of latency. Following reactivation, progeny viral particles travel anterogradely from the ganglia toward the nerve terminals, resulting in reinfection of the dermis or other innervated tissues. Reactivated infection can manifest in various forms, including asymptomatic virus shedding or mild focal lesions (herpes labialis), or less frequently in more-severe disease (herpes keratitis, encephalitis, and in the case of varicella-zoster virus, shingles).All herpesviruses consist of an icosahedral capsid that contains the viral genome surrounded by a layer of proteins known as the tegument, which is contained within a membrane envelope (33). HSV-1 and PRV capsids disassociate from the viral envelope (2, 13, 14, 22, 23, 25, 28, 30, 40) and several tegument proteins (13, 16, 21, 25) upon fusion-mediated entry into cells. However, following entry into epithelial cell lines, the VP1/2 and UL37 tegument proteins are detected in association with cytosolic capsids of PRV by immunogold electron microscopy (16) and colocalize with HSV-1 capsids at the nuclear membrane by immunofluorescence microscopy (8). In primary sensory neurons, VP1/2 and UL37 are observed to be cotransported with PRV capsids during retrograde transport by time lapse fluorescence microscopy (21), and the kinetics of axon transport have been assessed (39).Although HSV-1 and PRV share similarities in their neurotropism in vivo (reviewed in reference 12), studies of axon transport have indicated possible mechanistic differences relevant to the underlying cell biology of neural transmission (reviewed in reference 10). As a result, a live-cell analysis comparing PRV and HSV-1 is needed to determine if axon transport mechanisms are conserved between the two neuroinvasive herpesvirus genera: Simplexvirus (HSV-1) and Varicellovirus (PRV). In this study, the retrograde transport process that delivers capsids to the nuclei of sensory neurons was compared for HSV-1 (strains KOS and F) and PRV (strain Becker).