Relationship between the levels of wheat-rye metaphase I chromosomal pairing and recombination revealed by GISH

The metaphase I and anaphase I stages of meiosis of wheat×rye hybrids carrying the ph1b mutation were analyzed by genomic in situ hybridization. This technique allows distinction between three different types of wheat-rye associations in metaphase I configurations as well as detection of wheat-rye recombinant chromosomes in anaphase I cells. The frequency of associations between wheat and rye chromosomes greatly exceeded the level of wheat-rye recombination found in the three hybrids examined. Extremely distal associations, which account for about 50% of the total wheat-rye metaphase I chromosomal pairing, can explain such a discrepancy between metaphase I and anaphase I data. It is further discussed whether these associations reflect very distally located chiasmata or nonchiasmatic pairing. The sizes of the segments exchanged in wheat-rye recombinant chromosomes provide cytological evidence that wheat-rye recombination is restricted to the distal chromosomal regions. Received: 24 August 1995; in revised form: 27 February 1996 / Accepted: 28 March 1996     

Most of the homoeologous pairing at metaphase I in wheat-rye hybrids is not chiasmatic

The use of telomeric C-bands in wheat-rye hybrids has made it possible to distinguish three types of wheat-wheat (1B^L) and wheat-rye associations (a, end-to-end extremely distal; b, end-to-ed distal; and c, interstitial) between homoeologous chromosomes at different metaphase I stages (early, middle and late) and also to estimate the actual recombination frequencies for such associations at anaphase I. There was a decrease of the a and b association frequencies during the different metaphase I stages, whereas the c type remained without variation in all stages. A good fit between the frequencies of c associations at metaphase I and the number of recombinant chromosomes at anaphase I, assuming a maximum of one chiasma per bond, was found; however, there was no correspondence between metaphase I and anaphase I data when all associations (a + b + c) were considered. In addition, rye-rye homologous pairing was observed at metaphase I, but no evidence for rye-rye recombination was found at anaphase I. The results indicate that most of end-to-end (a and b) homoeologous and nonhomologous associations are actually nonchiasmatic and are a remnant of prophase pairing.     

Pairing and recombination between individual chromosomes of wheat and rye in hybrids carrying the ph1b mutation

Wheat-rye chromosome associations at metaphase I studied by Naranjo and Fernández-Rueda (1991) in ph1b ABDR hybrids have been reanalysed to establish the frequency of pairing between individual chromosomes of wheat and rye. Wheat chromosomes, except for 2A and 2D, and their arms were identified by C-banding. Diagnostic C-bands and other cytological markers such as telocentrics or translocations were used to identify each one of the rye chromosomes and their arms. Both the amount of telomeric C-heterochromatin and the structure of the rye chromosomes relative to wheat affected the level of wheatrye pairing. The degree to which rye chromosomes paired with their wheat homoeologues varied with each of the three wheat genomes; in most groups, the B-R association was more frequent than the A-R or D-R associations. Recombination between arms 1RL and 2RL and their homoeologues of wheat possessing a different telomeric C-banding pattern was detected and quantified at anaphase I. The frequency of recombinant chromosomes obtained supports the premise that recombination between wheat and rye chromosomes may be estimated from wheat-rye pairing.     

Condensin II resolves chromosomal associations to enable anaphase I segregation in Drosophila male meiosis

Several meiotic processes ensure faithful chromosome segregation to create haploid gametes. Errors to any one of these processes can lead to zygotic aneuploidy with the potential for developmental abnormalities. During prophase I of Drosophila male meiosis, each bivalent condenses and becomes sequestered into discrete chromosome territories. Here, we demonstrate that two predicted condensin II subunits, Cap-H2 and Cap-D3, are required to promote territory formation. In mutants of either subunit, territory formation fails and chromatin is dispersed throughout the nucleus. Anaphase I is also abnormal in Cap-H2 mutants as chromatin bridges are found between segregating heterologous and homologous chromosomes. Aneuploid sperm may be generated from these defects as they occur at an elevated frequency and are genotypically consistent with anaphase I segregation defects. We propose that condensin II–mediated prophase I territory formation prevents and/or resolves heterologous chromosomal associations to alleviate their potential interference in anaphase I segregation. Furthermore, condensin II–catalyzed prophase I chromosome condensation may be necessary to resolve associations between paired homologous chromosomes of each bivalent. These persistent chromosome associations likely consist of DNA entanglements, but may be more specific as anaphase I bridging was rescued by mutations in the homolog conjunction factor teflon. We propose that the consequence of condensin II mutations is a failure to resolve heterologous and homologous associations mediated by entangled DNA and/or homolog conjunction factors. Furthermore, persistence of homologous and heterologous interchromosomal associations lead to anaphase I chromatin bridging and the generation of aneuploid gametes.     

The origin of meiotic bridges by chiasma formation in heterozygous inversions in Prosimulium multidentatum (Diptera: Simuliidae)

Prosimulium multidentatum (Twinn) has three metacentric pairs in its chromosome complement. All six arms are individually identifiably in polytene nuclei. XY₁ males are heterozygous for a small basal non-conformity in section 59 of the non-pairing sex differential segments which extends from sextion 58 to section 62 of the IIL arm. XY₂ males carry an additional large heterozygous inversion in the center of this same arm. Meiosis is chiasmate in both kinds of male. In XY₂ individuals 14.2% of the pachytene nuclei show reverse loop pairing and 12.5% of the anaphase I cells form bridge-fragment configurations. A majority of these bridges persist into second division and 7.1% double sized spermatids are formed. No pachytene loops or anaphase bridges were found in XY₁ males. It is concluded therefore that the bridges and fragments of XY₂ males result from chiasma formation within the Y₂ inversion.     

The Development and Meiotic Behavior of Asymmetrical Isochromosomes in Wheat

To determine which segments of a chromosome arm are responsible for the initiation of chiasmate pairing in meiosis, a series of novel isochromosomes was developed in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). These isochromosomes are deficient for different terminal segments in the two arms. It is proposed to call them ``asymmetrical.' Meiotic metaphase I pairing of these asymmetrical isochromosomes was observed in plants with various doses of normal and deficient arms. The two arms of an asymmetrical isochromosome were bound by a chiasma in only two of the 1134 pollen mother cells analyzed. Pairing was between arms of identical length whenever such were available; otherwise, there was no pairing. However, two arms deficient for the same segment paired with a frequency similar to that of normal arms, indicating that the deficient arms retained normal capacity for pairing. Pairing of arms of different length was prevented not by the deficiency itself, but rather, by the heterozygosity for the deficiency. Whether two arms were connected via a centromere in an isochromosome or were present in two different chromosomes had no effect on pairing. This demonstrates that in the absence of homology in the distal regions of chromosome arms, even if relatively short, very long homologous segments may remain unrecognized in meiosis and will not be involved in chiasmate pairing.     

Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis

Using green fluorescent protein probes and rapid acquisition of high-resolution fluorescence images, sister centromeres in budding yeast are found to be separated and oscillate between spindle poles before anaphase B spindle elongation. The rates of movement during these oscillations are similar to those of microtubule plus end dynamics. The degree of preanaphase separation varies widely, with infrequent centromere reassociations observed before anaphase. Centromeres are in a metaphase-like conformation, whereas chromosome arms are neither aligned nor separated before anaphase. Upon spindle elongation, centromere to pole movement (anaphase A) was synchronous for all centromeres and occurred coincident with or immediately after spindle pole separation (anaphase B). Chromatin proximal to the centromere is stretched poleward before and during anaphase onset. The stretched chromatin was observed to segregate to the spindle pole bodies at rates greater than centromere to pole movement, indicative of rapid elastic recoil between the chromosome arm and the centromere. These results indicate that the elastic properties of DNA play an as of yet undiscovered role in the poleward movement of chromosome arms.     

Chromosomal interchange inEleutherine plicata Herb

Chromosome behaviour at metaphase I and anaphase I of meiosis inEleutherine plicata Herb. (2n=14) is studied. Cells with chromosome associations comprising an association of four long chromosomes, in addition to five bivalents were observed more frequently than those with seven bivalents. it is concluded that the ring of four is due to a segmental interchange between the two long non-homologous chromosome pairs. The ring of four at anaphase I showed delayed disjunction, bridge formation and irregular separation of chromosomes in a number of cells while the behaviour of the other bivalents was normal.     

Division of the nucleolus and its release of CDC14 during anaphase of meiosis I depends on separase,SPO12, and SLK19

Disjunction of maternal and paternal centromeres during meiosis I requires crossing over between homologous chromatids, which creates chiasmata that hold homologs together. It also depends on a mechanism ensuring that maternal and paternal sister kinetochore pairs attach to oppositely oriented microtubules. Proteolytic cleavage of cohesin's Rec8 subunit by separase destroys cohesion between sister chromatid arms at anaphase I and thereby resolves chiasmata. The Spo12 and Slk19 proteins have been implicated in regulating meiosis I kinetochore orientation and/or in preventing cleavage of Rec8 at centromeres. We show here that the role of these proteins is instead to promote nucleolar segregation, including release of the Cdc14 phosphatase required for Cdk1 inactivation and disassembly of the anaphase I spindle. Separase is also required but surprisingly not its protease activity. It has two mechanistically different roles during meiosis I. Loss of the protease-independent function alone results in a second meiotic division occurring on anaphase I spindles in spo12delta and slk19delta mutants.     

Involvement of chromatid cohesiveness at the centromere and chromosome arms in meiotic chromosome segregation: A cytological approach

Kinetochores and chromatid cores of meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper species Arcyptera fusca and Eyprepocnemis plorans were differentially silver stained to analyse the possible involvement of both structures in chromatid cohesiveness and meiotic chromosome segregation. Special attention was paid to the behaviour of these structures in the univalent sex chromosome, and in B univalents with different orientations during the first meiotic division. It was observed that while sister chromatid of univalents are associated at metaphase I, chromatid cores are individualised independently of their orientation. We think that cohesive proteins on the inner surface of sister chromatids, and not the chromatid cores, are involved in the chromatid cohesiveness that maintains associated sister chromatids of bivalents and univalents until anaphase I. At anaphase I sister chromatids of amphitelically oriented B univalents or spontaneous autosomal univalents separate but do not reach the poles because they remain connected at the centromere by a long strand which can be visualized by silver staining, that joins stretched sister kinetochores. This strand is normally observed between sister kinetochores of half-bivalents at metaphase II and early anaphase II. We suggest that certain centromere proteins that form the silver-stainable strand assure chromosome integrity until metaphase II. These cohesive centromere proteins would be released or modified during anaphase II to allow normal chromatid segregation. Failure of this process during the first meiotic division could lead to the lagging of amphitelically oriented univalents. Based on our results we propose a model of meiotic chromosome segregation. During mitosis the cohesive proteins located at the centromere and chromosome arms are released during the same cellular division. During meiosis those proteins must be sequentially inactivated, i.e. those situated on the inner surface of the chromatids must be eliminated during the first meiotic division while those located at the centromere must be released during the second meiotic division.by D.P. Bazett-Jones     

Fine structure of anaphase bridges in meiotic chromosomes of the crane fly Pales

Chromatin bridges of autosomal bivalents in anaphase I were observed in spermatocytes of Pales ferruginea. The bridges are formed without simultaneous production of akinetochoric (akinetic) fragments. A bridge consists of a single fiber up to approximately. 500 Å in diameter. Filamentous substructures of approximately 100 Å diameter can be visualized. It is suggested that these bridges represent a low order coiling of the chromatid, and may be caused by non-separation of the terminal segments of the chromatids (telomeres).     

An indirect test for a role of the synaptonemal complex in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesiveness

The meiotic behavior of a special maize trisome was quantitatively observed at pachytene, metaphase I, anaphase I, prophase II, metaphase II and anaphase II. The data obtained are consistent with (but do not prove) the model that sister chromatid cohesiveness at anaphase I may be established during pachytene synapsis of the chromosome regions involved. The data suggest, however, that the normal prophase II maintenance of dyad integrity by cohesiveness of sister chromatid centromere regions does not depend upon prior synapsis of these regions, although monads separated from each other on the anaphase I spindle may be delivered to the same prophase II daughter nucleus. — The strands which some of the time connect sister chromatids which are separating equationally at anaphase I show a positive Feulgen staining reaction.     

Verteilung der Mikrotubuli in Metaphase- und Anaphase-Spindeln der Spermatocyten von Pales ferruginea

One metaphase I spindle, seven anaphase I spindles of different stages, and one metaphase II spindle were sectioned in series. The ultrastructure of chromosomes was examined and microtubules (MTs) were counted. The main results of the study are summarized as follows: 1. The autosomes move at the periphery of the continuous MTs during anaphase while the sex chromosomes move more or less within this group of MTs. 2. In metaphase the antosomes have few coarse surface projections, in anaphase many, but more delicate projections of irregular shape which seem to transform into regular radial lamellae at the end of movement. 3. In metaphase continuous MTs have no contact with the chromosomal surface, while during anaphase movement continuous MTs lie closer to the chromosomes, and finally arrange themselves between the radial surface lamellae. There they show lateral filamentous connections with the chromosomal surface. 4. The MT distribution profiles of metaphase and anaphase are different. While the highest density of MTs is observed in the middle region of the spindle in metaphase, there are two density zones during autosomal movement, each in one half spindle in front of the autosomes. After the autosomes have reached the poles the distribution profile is again similar to the metaphase condition. The MT distribution in metaphase II is the same as in metaphase I. Possible explanations for these observations are discussed in detail. 5. There is an overall decrease in MT content during anaphase. 6. With the onset of anaphase MTs are seen within the spindle mantle, closely associated with mitochondria. — Several theoretical aspects of anaphase mechanism are briefly discussed.     

Cytostatic Activity Develops during Meiosis I in Oocytes of LT/Sv Mice

Oocytes of wild-type mice are ovulated as the secondary oocytes arrested at metaphase of the second meiotic division. Their fertilization or parthenogenetic activation triggers the completion of the second meiotic division followed by the first embryonic interphase. Oocytes of the LT/Sv strain of mice are ovulated either at the first meiotic metaphase (M I) as primary oocytes or in the second meiotic metaphase (M II) as secondary oocytes. We show here that duringin vitromaturation a high proportion of LT/Sv oocytes progresses normally only until metaphase I. In these oocytes MAP kinase activates shortly after histone H1 kinase (MPF) activation and germinal vesicle breakdown. However, MAP kinase activation is slightly earlier than in oocytes from wild-type F1 (CBA/H × C57Bl/10) mice. The first meiotic spindle of these oocytes forms similarly to wild-type oocytes. During aging, however, it increases in size and finally degenerates. In those oocytes which do not remain in metaphase I the extrusion of first polar bodies is highly delayed and starts about 15 h after germinal vesicle breakdown. Most of the oocytes enter interphase directly after first polar body extrusion. Fusion between metaphase I LT/Sv oocytes and wild-type mitotic one-cell embryos results in prolonged M-phase arrest of hybrids in a proportion similar to control LT/Sv oocytes and control hybrids made by fusion of two M I LT/Sv oocytes. This indicates that LT/Sv oocytes develop cytostatic factor during metaphase I. Eventually, anaphase occurs spontaneously and the hybrids extrude the polar body and form pronuclei in a proportion similar as in controls. In hybrids between LT/Sv metaphase I oocytes and wild-type metaphase II oocytes (which contain cytostatic factor) anaphase I proceeds at the time observed in control LT/Sv oocytes and hybrids between two M I LT/Sv oocytes, and is followed by the parthenogenetic activation and formation of interphase nuclei. Also the great majority of hybrids between M I and M II wild-type oocytes undergoes the anaphase but further arrests in a subsequent M-phase. These observations suggest that an internally triggered anaphase I occurs despite the presence of the cytostatic activity both in LT/Sv and wild-type M I oocytes. Anaphase I triggering mechanism must therefore either inactivate or override the CSF activity. The comparison between spontaneous and induced activation of metaphase I LT/Sv oocytes shows that mechanisms involved in anaphase I triggering are altered in these oocytes. Thus, the prolongation of metaphase I in LT/Sv oocytes seems to be determined by delayed anaphase I triggering and not provoked directly by the cytostatic activity.     

Physical distribution of recombination in B-genome chromosomes of tetraploid wheat

Summary Several studies have indicated a noncorrespondence between genetic and physical distances in wheat chromosomes. To study the physical distribution of recombination, polymorphism for C-banding patterns was used to monitor recombination in 67 segments in 11 B-genome chromosome arms of Triticum turgidum. Recombination was absent in proximal regions of all chromosome arms; its frequency increased exponentially with distance from the centromere. A significant difference was observed between the distribution of recombination in physically short and physically long arms. In physically short arms, recombination was almost exclusively concentrated in distal segments and only those regions were represented in their genetic maps. In physically long arms, while a majority of the genetic distance was again based upon recombination in distal chromosome segments, some interstitial recombination was observed. Consequently, these regions also contributed to the genetic maps. Such a pattern of recombination, skewed toward terminal segments of chromosomes, is probably a result of telomeric pairing initiation and strong positive chiasma interference. Interference averaged 0.81 in 35 pairs of adjacent segments and 0.57 across the entire recombining portions of chromosome arms. The total genetic map lengths of the arms corresponded closely to those expected on the basis of their metaphase-I chiasma frequencies. As a consequence of this uneven distribution of recombination there can be a 153-fold difference (or more) in the number of DNA base pairs per unit (centiMorgan) of genetic length.     

Steric hindrance and its effect on chromosome movement inVicia faba somatic cells

Summary The arrangement of chromosome arms in metaphases and anaphases has been studied inVicia faba root meristem cells. During metaphase, the long chromosome arms are aligned parallel to the spindle axis. As a consequence, at the onset of anaphase, one chromatid can move straight ahead to the spindle pole whereas the other has to invert its orientation. Specially in narrow cells it has been observed frequently that some chromatids move in a reverse orientation to the pole, i.e., they move telomere-first instead of centromere-first. This behaviour results in a chromatid which protrudes beyond the main group of late anaphase or telophase chromatids. It is dicussed that the most likely explanation for the phenomenon is that in narrow cells chromatid behaviour is influenced by steric hindrance by the tightly packed surrounding chromatids and microtubules. When there is insufficient room, some chromatids are unable to make the required U-turn. Under such conditions the kinetochore of a non-inverted chromatid pulls the chromatid in a reverse orientation to the pole. An alternative explanation, i.e., protruding chromatids being the result of a neocentric activity at the telomere end of a reverse-directed chromatid or the lateral associations of spindle microtubules, failed to find support by electron microscopical studies.     

Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin

It has been proposed but never proven that cohesion between sister chromatids distal to chiasmata is responsible for holding homologous chromosomes together while spindles attempt to pull them toward opposite poles during metaphase of meiosis I. Meanwhile, the mechanism by which disjunction of homologs is triggered at the onset of anaphase I has remained a complete mystery. In yeast, cohesion between sister chromatid arms during meiosis depends on a meiosis-specific cohesin subunit called Rec8, whose mitotic equivalent, Sccl, is cleaved at the metaphase to anaphase transition by an endopeptidase called separin. We show here that cleavage of Rec8 by separin at one of two different sites is necessary for the resolution of chiasmata and the disjunction of homologous chromosomes during meiosis.     

Structure and mode of formation of the nucleolus in meristematic cells of Vicia faba and Allium cepa

Interphase nucleoli from Vicia faba and Allium cepa meristematic cells are roughly classified into two categories: (a) those that commonly show a rather homogeneous texture (except for small light spaces of various sizes) and frequently contain dense particles 140 A in diameter; (b) those found more frequently in Vicia characterized by a very sharp boundary between a dense outer cortex and a much lighter central core. The dense particles are not found in such nucleoli. In Allium the boundary is more irregular and dense particles are sometimes observed in the outer layer. Many nucleoli show a structure intermediate between these two types. They are characterized by a gradient of increasing density from the center to the periphery and occasionally contain dense 140 A granules. During interphase, certain nucleoli are closely associated with segments of chromatin strands which undoubtedly represent nucleolar organizing regions. The dense 140 A granules are followed during the mitotic cycle. In Allium, they are first seen in loose clusters between arms of late anaphase chromosomes where they become more concentrated in early telophase. The substance within which they are scattered slowly increases in density during that time until finally, the particles are limited to small bodies of distinctive character. Evidence is presented suggesting that these small prenucleolar bodies fuse during telophase to give rise to the mature interphase nucleoli. Similar events are described in Vicia material except that a coating of dense substance appears around telophase chromosomes before the formation of prenucleolar bodies.     

Micromanipulation of chromosomes reveals that cohesion release during cell division is gradual and does not require tension

In mitosis, cohesion appears to be present along the entire length of the chromosome, between centromeres and along chromosome arms. By metaphase, sister chromatids appear as two adjacent but visibly distinct rods. Sister chromatids separate from one another in anaphase by releasing all chromosome cohesion. This is different from meiosis I, in which pairs of sister chromatids separate from one another, moving to each spindle pole by releasing cohesion only between sister chromatid arms. Then, in anaphase II, sister chromatids separate by releasing centromere cohesion. Our objective was to find where cohesion is present or absent on chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis and when and how it is released. We determined cohesion directly by pulling on chromosomes with two micromanipulation needles. Thus, we could distinguish for the first time between apparent doubleness as seen in the microscope and physical separability. We found that apparent doubleness can be deceiving: Visibly distinct sister chromatids often cannot be separated. We also demonstrated that cohesion is released gradually in anaphase, with chromosomes looking as if they were unzipped or pulled apart. This implied that tension from spindle forces was required, but we showed directly that no tension was necessary to pull chromatids apart.