Structure of the cross-striated adductor muscle of the scallop

The structure of the cross-striated adductor muscle of the scallop has been studied by electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction using living relaxed, glycerol-extracted (rigor), fixed and dried muscles. The thick filaments are arranged in a hexagonal lattice whose size varies with sarcomere length so as to maintain a constant lattice volume. In the overlap region there are approximately 12 thin filaments about each thick filament and these are arranged in a partially disordered lattice similar to that found in other invertebrate muscles, giving a thin-to-thick filament ratio in this region of 6:1.The thin filaments, which contain actin and tropomyosin, are about 1 μm long and the actin subunits are arranged on a helix of pitch 2 × 38.5 nm. The thick filaments, which contain myosin and paramyosin, are about 1.76 μm long and have a backbone diameter of about 21 nm. We propose that these filaments have a core of paramyosin about 6 nm in diameter, around which the myosin molecules pack. In living relaxed muscle, the projecting myosin heads are symmetrically arranged. The data are consistent with a six-stranded helix, each strand having a pitch of 290 nm. The projections along the strands each correspond to the heads of one or two myosin molecules and occur at alternating intervals of 13 and 16 nm. In rigor muscle these projections move away from the backbone and attach to the thin filaments.In both living and dried muscle, alternate planes of thick filaments are staggered longitudinally relative to each other by about 7.2 nm. This gives rise to a body-centred orthorhombic lattice with a unit cell twice the volume of the basic filament lattice.     

Cross-bridge action: present views, prospects, and unknowns

When the sliding filament hypothesis was proposed in 1953-1954, existing evidence showed that (1) contributions to tension were given by active sites uniformly distributed within each zone of filament overlap and (2) each site functioned cyclically. These sites were identified by electron microscopy as cross-bridges between the two filaments, formed of the heads of myosin molecules projecting from a thick filament and attaching to a thin filament. The angle of these cross-bridges was found to be different at rest and in rigor, suggesting that the event causing relative motion of the filaments was a change of the angle of the cross-bridges. At first, it seemed likely that the whole cross-bridge rotated about its attachment to actin, but when the atomic structures of actin and myosin were obtained by X-ray crystallography, a possible hinge was found between the "catalytic domain" which attaches to the actin filament and the "light-chain domain" which appears to act as a lever arm. Two attitudes of the lever arm are now well established, the transition between them being driven by a conformational change coupled to some step in the hydrolysis of ATP, but several recent observations suggest that this is not the whole story: a third attitude has been shown by X-ray crystallography; a non-muscle myosin has been shown to produce its working stroke in two steps; and there are suggestions that an additional displacement of the filaments is produced by a change in the attitude of the catalytic domain on the thin filament.     

X-ray diffraction evidence for the extensibility of actin and myosin filaments during muscle contraction.

To clarify the extensibility of thin actin and thick myosin filaments in muscle, we examined the spacings of actin and myosin filament-based reflections in x-ray diffraction patterns at high resolution during isometric contraction of frog skeletal muscles and steady lengthening of the active muscles using synchrotron radiation as an intense x-ray source and a storage phosphor plate as a high sensitivity, high resolution area detector. Spacing of the actin meridional reflection at approximately 1/2.7 nm-1, which corresponds to the axial rise per actin subunit in the thin filament, increased about 0.25% during isometric contraction of muscles at full overlap length of thick and thin filaments. The changes in muscles stretched to approximately half overlap of the filaments, when they were scaled linearly up to the full isometric tension, gave an increase of approximately 0.3%. Conversely, the spacing decreased by approximately 0.1% upon activation of muscles at nonoverlap length. Slow stretching of a contracting muscle increased tension and increased this spacing over the isometric contraction value. Scaled up to a 100% tension increase, this corresponds to a approximately 0.26% additional change, consistent with that of the initial isometric contraction. Taken together, the extensibility of the actin filament amounts to 3-4 nm of elongation when a muscle switches from relaxation to maximum isometric contraction. Axial spacings of the layer-line reflections at approximately 1/5.1 nm-1 and approximately 1/5.9 nm-1 corresponding to the pitches of the right- and left-handed genetic helices of the actin filament, showed similar changes to that of the meridional reflection during isometric contraction of muscles at full overlap. The spacing changes of these reflections, which also depend on the mechanical load on the muscle, indicate that elongation is accompanied by slight changes of the actin helical structure possibly because of the axial force exerted by the actomyosin cross-bridges. Additional small spacing changes of the myosin meridional reflections during length changes applied to contracting muscles represented an increase of approximately 0.26% (scaled up to a 100% tension increase) in the myosin periodicity, suggesting that such spacing changes correspond to a tension-related extension of the myosin filaments. Elongation of the myosin filament backbone amounts to approximately 2.1 nm per half sarcomere. The results indicate that a large part (approximately 70%) of the sarcomere compliance of an active muscle is caused by the extensibility of the actin and myosin filaments; 42% of the compliance resides in the actin filaments, and 27% of it is in the myosin filaments.     

Twirling of actin by myosins II and V observed via polarized TIRF in a modified gliding assay

The force generated between actin and myosin acts predominantly along the direction of the actin filament, resulting in relative sliding of the thick and thin filaments in muscle or transport of myosin cargos along actin tracks. Previous studies have also detected lateral forces or torques that are generated between actin and myosin, but the origin and biological role of these sideways forces is not known. Here we adapt an actin gliding filament assay to measure the rotation of an actin filament about its axis (“twirling”) as it is translocated by myosin. We quantify the rotation by determining the orientation of sparsely incorporated rhodamine-labeled actin monomers, using polarized total internal reflection microscopy. To determine the handedness of the filament rotation, linear incident polarizations in between the standard s- and p-polarizations were generated, decreasing the ambiguity of our probe orientation measurement fourfold. We found that whole myosin II and myosin V both twirl actin with a relatively long (∼1 μm), left-handed pitch that is insensitive to myosin concentration, filament length, and filament velocity.     

Crossbridge and tropomyosin positions observed in native, interacting thick and thin filaments

Tropomyosin movements on thin filaments are thought to sterically regulate muscle contraction, but have not been visualized during active filament sliding. In addition, although 3-D visualization of myosin crossbridges has been possible in rigor, it has been difficult for thick filaments actively interacting with thin filaments. In the current study, using three-dimensional reconstruction of electron micrographs of interacting filaments, we have been able to resolve not only tropomyosin, but also the docking sites for weak and strongly bound crossbridges on thin filaments. In relaxing conditions, tropomyosin was observed on the outer domain of actin, and thin filament interactions with thick filaments were rare. In contracting conditions, tropomyosin had moved to the inner domain of actin, and extra density, reflecting weakly bound, cycling myosin heads, was also detected, on the extreme periphery of actin. In rigor conditions, tropomyosin had moved further on to the inner domain of actin, and strongly bound myosin heads were now observed over the junction of the inner and outer domains. We conclude (1) that tropomyosin movements consistent with the steric model of muscle contraction occur in interacting thick and thin filaments, (2) that myosin-induced movement of tropomyosin in activated filaments requires strongly bound crossbridges, and (3) that crossbridges are bound to the periphery of actin, at a site distinct from the strong myosin binding site, at an early stage of the crossbridge cycle.     

Calcium regulates scallop muscle by changing myosin flexibility

Muscle myosins are molecular motors that convert the chemical free energy available from ATP hydrolysis into mechanical displacement of actin filaments, bringing about muscle contraction. Myosin cross-bridges exert force on actin filaments during a cycle of attached and detached states that are coupled to each round of ATP hydrolysis. Contraction and ATPase activity of the striated adductor muscle of scallop is controlled by calcium ion binding to myosin. This mechanism of the so-called “thick filament regulation” is quite different to vertebrate striated muscle which is switched on and off via “thin filament regulation” whereby calcium ions bind to regulatory proteins associated with the actin filaments. We have used an optically based single molecule technique to measure the angular disposition adopted by the two myosin heads whilst bound to actin in the presence and absence of calcium ions. This has allowed us to directly observe the movement of individual myosin heads in aqueous solution at room temperature in real time. We address the issue of how scallop striated muscle myosin might be regulated by calcium and have interpreted our results in terms of the structures of smooth muscle myosin that also exhibit thick filament regulation. This paper is not being submitted elsewhere and the authors have no competing financial interests     

Actin-facilitated assembly of smooth muscle myosin induces formation of actomyosin fibrils

To identify regulatory mechanisms potentially involved in formation of actomyosin structures in smooth muscle cells, the influence of F-actin on smooth muscle myosin assembly was examined. In physiologically relevant buffers, AMPPNP binding to myosin caused transition to the soluble 10S myosin conformation due to trapping of nucleotide at the active sites. The resulting 10S myosin-AMPPNP complex was highly stable and thick filament assembly was suppressed. However, upon addition to F-actin, myosin readily assembled to form thick filaments. Furthermore, myosin assembly caused rearrangement of actin filament networks into actomyosin fibers composed of coaligned F-actin and myosin thick filaments. Severin-induced fragmentation of actin in actomyosin fibers resulted in immediate disassembly of myosin thick filaments, demonstrating that actin filaments were indispensable for mediating myosin assembly in the presence of AMPPNP. Actomyosin fibers also formed after addition of F-actin to nonphosphorylated 10S myosin monomers containing the products of ATP hydrolysis trapped at the active site. The resulting fibers were rapidly disassembled after addition of millimolar MgATP and consequent transition of myosin to the soluble 10S state. However, reassembly of myosin filaments in the presence of MgATP and F-actin could be induced by phosphorylation of myosin P-light chains, causing regeneration of actomyosin fiber bundles. The results indicate that actomyosin fibers can be spontaneously formed by F-actin-mediated assembly of smooth muscle myosin. Moreover, induction of actomyosin fibers by myosin light chain phosphorylation in the presence of actin filament networks provides a plausible hypothesis for contractile fiber assembly in situ.     

Probing Muscle Myosin Motor Action: X-Ray (M3 and M6) Interference Measurements Report Motor Domain Not Lever Arm Movement

The key question in understanding how force and movement are produced in muscle concerns the nature of the cyclic interaction of myosin molecules with actin filaments. The lever arm of the globular head of each myosin molecule is thought in some way to swing axially on the actin-attached motor domain, thus propelling the actin filament past the myosin filament. Recent X-ray diffraction studies of vertebrate muscle, especially those involving the analysis of interference effects between myosin head arrays in the two halves of the thick filaments, have been claimed to prove that the lever arm moves at the same time as the sliding of actin and myosin filaments in response to muscle length or force steps. It was suggested that the sliding of myosin and actin filaments, the level of force produced and the lever arm angle are all directly coupled and that other models of lever arm movement will not fit the X-ray data. Here, we show that, in addition to interference across the A-band, which must be occurring, the observed meridional M3 and M6 X-ray intensity changes can all be explained very well by the changing diffraction effects during filament sliding caused by heads stereospecifically attached to actin moving axially relative to a population of detached or non-stereospecifically attached heads that remain fixed in position relative to the myosin filament backbone. Crucially, and contrary to previous interpretations, the X-ray interference results provide little direct information about the position of the myosin head lever arm; they are, in fact, reporting relative motor domain movements. The implications of the new interpretation are briefly assessed.     

Purification of native myosin filaments from muscle

Analysis of the structure and function of native thick (myosin-containing) filaments of muscle has been hampered in the past by the difficulty of obtaining a pure preparation. We have developed a simple method for purifying native myosin filaments from muscle filament suspensions. The method involves severing thin (actin-containing) filaments into short segments using a Ca(2+)-insensitive fragment of gelsolin, followed by differential centrifugation to purify the thick filaments. By gel electrophoresis, the purified thick filaments show myosin heavy and light chains together with nonmyosin thick filament components. Contamination with actin is below 3.5%. Electron microscopy demonstrates intact thick filaments, with helical cross-bridge order preserved, and essentially complete removal of thin filaments. The method has been developed for striated muscles but can also be used in a modified form to remove contaminating thin filaments from native smooth muscle myofibrils. Such preparations should be useful for thick filament structural and biochemical studies.     

Nanosurfer assay dissects β-cardiac myosin and cardiac myosin-binding protein C interactions

Cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C) modulates cardiac contractility through putative interactions with the myosin S2 tail and/or the thin filament. The relative contribution of these binding-partner interactions to cMyBP-C modulatory function remains unclear. Hence, we developed a “nanosurfer” assay as a model system to interrogate these cMyBP-C binding-partner interactions. Synthetic thick filaments were generated using recombinant human β-cardiac myosin subfragments (HMM or S1) attached to DNA nanotubes, with 14- or 28-nm spacing, corresponding to the 14.3-nm myosin spacing in native thick filaments. The nanosurfer assay consists of DNA nanotubes added to the in vitro motility assay so that myosins on the motility surface effectively deliver thin filaments to the DNA nanotubes, enhancing thin filament gliding probability on the DNA nanotubes. Thin filament velocities on nanotubes with either 14- or 28-nm myosin spacing were no different. We then characterized the effects of cMyBP-C on thin filament motility by alternating HMM and cMyBP-C N-terminal fragments (C0–C2 or C1–C2) on nanotubes every 14 nm. Both C0–C2 and C1–C2 reduced thin filament velocity four- to sixfold relative to HMM alone. Similar inhibition occurred using the myosin S1 construct, which lacks the myosin S2 region proposed to interact with cMyBP-C, suggesting that the cMyBP-C N terminus must interact with other myosin head domains and/or actin to slow thin filament velocity. Thin filament velocity was unaffected by the C0–C1f fragment, which lacks the majority of the M-domain, supporting the importance of this domain for inhibitory interaction(s). A C0–C2 fragment with phospho-mimetic replacement in the M-domain showed markedly less inhibition of thin filament velocity compared with its phospho-null counterpart, highlighting the modulatory role of M-domain phosphorylation on cMyBP-C function. Therefore, the nanosurfer assay provides a platform to precisely manipulate spatially dependent cMyBP-C binding-partner interactions, shedding light on the molecular regulation of β-cardiac myosin contractility.     

LOCALIZATION OF MYOSIN FILAMENTS IN SMOOTH MUSCLE

Thick myosin filaments, in addition to actin filaments, were found in sections of glycerinated chicken gizzard smooth muscle when fixed at a pH below 6.6. The thick filaments were often grouped into bundles and run in the longitudinal axis of the smooth muscle cell. Each thick filament was surrounded by a number of thin filaments, giving the filament arrangement a rosette appearance in cross-section. The exact ratio of thick filaments to thin filaments could not be determined since most arrays were not so regular as those commonly found in striated muscle. Some rosettes had seven or eight thin filaments surrounding a single thick filament. Homogenates of smooth muscle of chicken gizzard also showed both thick and thin filaments when the isolation was carried out at a pH below 6.6, but only thin filaments were found at pH 7.4. No Z or M lines were observed in chicken gizzard muscle containing both thick and thin filaments. The lack of these organizing structures may allow smooth muscle myosin to disaggregate readily at pH 7.4.     

SOME ASPECTS OF THE STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE MYOFIBRIL AS REVEALED BY ANTIBODY-STAINING METHODS

From observations of fluorescent antibody staining and antibody staining in electron microscopy, evidence is presented for the following: (a) Direct contact of the actin and myosin filaments occurs at all stages of contraction. This results in inhibition of antibody staining of the H-meromyosin portion of the myosin molecule in the region of overlap of the thin and thick filaments. (b) Small structural changes occur in the thick filaments during contraction. This leads to exposure of antigenic sites of the L-meromyosin portion of the myosin molecule. The accessibility of these antigenic sites is dependent upon the sarcomere length. (c) The M line is composed of a protein which is weakly bound to the center of the thick filament and is not actin, myosin, or tropomyosin. (d) Tropomyosin as well as actin is present in the I band. (e) If actin or tropomyosin is present in the Z line, it is masked and unavailable for staining with antibody.     

Alterations in flightin phosphorylation inDrosophila flight muscles are associated with myofibrillar defects engendered by actin and myosin heavy-chain mutant alleles

Flightin is a 20-kD myofibrillar protein found in the stretch-activated flight muscles ofDrosophila melanogaster. Nine of the eleven isoelectric variants of flightin are generatedin vivo by multiple phosphorylations. The accumulation of these isoelectric variants is affected differently by mutations that eliminate thick filaments or thin filaments. Mutations in the myosin heavy-chain gene that prevent thick filament assembly block accumulation of all flightin variants except N1, the unphosphorylated precursor, which is present at much reduced levels. Mutations in the flight muscle-specific actin gene that block actin synthesis and prevent thin filament assembly disrupt the temporal regulation of flightin phosphorylation, resulting in premature phosphorylation and premature accumulation of flightin phosphovariants. Cellular fractionation of fibers that are devoid of thin filaments show that flightin remains associated with the thick filamentrich cytomatrix. These results suggest that flightin is a structural component of the thick filaments whose regulated phosphorylation is dependent upon the presence of thin filaments.This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant IBN-9253045.     

Disorder induced in nonoverlap myosin cross-bridges by loss of adenosine triphosphate.

Adenosine triphosphate-dependent changes in myosin filament structure have been directly observed in whole muscle by electron microscopy of thin sections of rapidly frozen, demembranated frog sartorius specimens. In the presence of ATP the thick filaments show an ordered, helical array of cross-bridges except in the bare zone. In the absence of ATP they show two distinct appearances: in the region of overlap with actin, there is an ordered, rigorlike array of cross-bridges between the thick and thin filaments, whereas in the nonoverlap region (H-zone) the myosin heads move away from the thick filament backbone and lose their helical order. This result suggests that the presence of ATP is necessary for maintenance of the helical array of cross-bridges characteristic of the relaxed state. The primary effect of ATP removal on the myosin heads appears to be weaken their binding to the thick filament backbone; released heads that are close to an actin filament subsequently form a new actin-based, ordered array.     

Modeling rigor cross-bridge patterns in muscle I. Initial studies of the rigor lattice of insect flight muscle.

We have undertaken some computer modeling studies of the cross-bridge observed by Reedy in insect flight muscle so that we investigate the geometric parameters that influence the attachment patterns of cross-bridges to actin filaments. We find that the appearance of double chevrons along an actin filament indicates that the cross-bridges are able to reach 10--14 nm axially, and about 90 degrees around the actin filament. Between three and five actin monomers are therefore available along each turn of one strand of actin helix for labeling by cross-bridges from an adjacent myosin filament. Reedy's flared X of four bridges, which appears rotated 60 degrees at successive levels on the thick filament, depends on the orientation of the actin filaments in the whole lattice as well as on the range of movement in each cross-bridge. Fairly accurate chevrons and flared X groupings can be modeled with a six-stranded myosin surface lattice. The 116-nm long repeat appears in our models as "beating" of the 14.5-nm myosin repeat and the 38.5-nm actin period. Fourier transforms of the labeled actin filaments indicate that the cross-bridges attach to each actin filament on average of 14.5 nm apart. The transform is sensitive to changes in the ease with which the cross-bridge can be distorted in different directions.     

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan muscles: evidence that twitchin interacts with myosin, myorod, and paramyosin core and affects properties of actomyosin

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan smooth muscles postulates in vivo existence of twitchin links between thin and thick filaments that arise in a phosphorylation-dependent manner [N.S. Shelud'ko, G.G. Matusovskaya, T.V. Permyakova, O.S. Matusovsky, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 432 (2004) 269-277]. In this paper, we proposed a scheme for a possible catch mechanism involving twitchin links and regulated thin filaments. The experimental evidence in support of the scheme is provided. It was found that twitchin can interact not only with mussel myosin and rabbit F-actin but also with the paramyosin core of thick filaments, myorod, mussel thin filaments, "natural" F-actin from mussel, and skeletal myosin from rabbit. No difference was revealed in binding of twitchin with mussel and rabbit myosin. The capability of twitchin to interact with all thick filament proteins suggests that putative twitchin links can be attached to any site of thick filaments. Addition of twitchin to a mixture of actin and paramyosin filaments, or to a mixture of Ca(2+)-regulated actin and myosin filaments under relaxing conditions caused in both cases similar changes in the optical properties of suspensions, indicating an interaction and aggregation of the filaments. The interaction of actin and myosin filaments in the presence of twitchin under relaxing conditions was not accompanied by an appreciable increase in the MgATPase activity. We suggest that in both cases aggregation of filaments was caused by formation of twitchin links between the filaments. We also demonstrate that native thin filaments from the catch muscle of the mussel Crenomytilus grayanus are Ca(2+)-regulated. Twitchin inhibits the ability of thin filaments to activate myosin MgATPase in the presence of Ca(2+). We suggest that twitchin inhibition of the actin-myosin interaction is due to twitchin-induced switching of the thin filaments to the inactive state.     

Filament compliance effects can explain tension overshoots during force development

Spatially explicit stochastic simulations of myosin S1 heads attaching to a single actin filament were used to investigate the process of force development in contracting muscle. Filament compliance effects were incorporated by adjusting the spacing between adjacent actin binding sites and adjacent myosin heads in response to cross-bridge attachment/detachment events. Appropriate model parameters were determined by multi-dimensional optimization and used to simulate force development records corresponding to different levels of Ca(2+) activation. Simulations in which the spacing between both adjacent actin binding sites and adjacent myosin S1 heads changed by approximately 0.06 nm after cross-bridge attachment/detachment events 1), exhibited tension overshoots with a Ca(2+) dependence similar to that measured experimentally and 2), mimicked the observed k(tr)-relative tension relationship without invoking a Ca(2+)-dependent increase in the rate of cross-bridge state transitions. Tension did not overshoot its steady-state value in control simulations modeling rigid thick and thin filaments with otherwise identical parameters. These results underline the importance of filament geometry and actin binding site availability in quantitative theories of muscle contraction.     

Sudden increase in speed of an actin filament moving on myosin cross-bridges of "mismatched" polarity observed when its leading end begins to interact with cross-bridges of "matched" polarity.

Under in vitro movement assay conditions, actin filaments move about 10 times faster toward, than away from, the center of large bipolar thick filaments of molluscan smooth muscle. Using thick filaments isolated from the anterior byssus retractor muscle of Mytilus edulis, the two speed modes of movement were studied in detail. Some thick filaments crossed over each other on the surface of the assay chamber, allowing actin filaments that moved into the crossover region to transfer to other thick filaments. When an actin filament that had been moving in the low speed mode crossed over to another thick filament and the speed changed to fast, the entire actin filament started to move in the high speed mode at the moment of transfer of its leading end, leaving the trailing part still in contact with the original thick filament. This indicates that myosin cross-bridges interacting in the slow mode do not impose a significant load on the cross-bridges interacting in the fast mode. Assuming the theoretical model of Tawada and Sekimoto [Biophys. J. 59, 343-356 (1991)], we suggest that the magnitude of force developed, as well as the speed of unloaded movement, differs greatly, depending on the orientation of the myosin cross-bridges.     

The N-terminal region of twitchin binds thick and thin contractile filaments: redundant mechanisms of catch force maintenance

Catch force maintenance in invertebrate smooth muscles is probably mediated by a force-bearing tether other than myosin cross-bridges between thick and thin filaments. The phosphorylation state of the mini-titin twitchin controls catch. The C-terminal phosphorylation site (D2) of twitchin with its flanking Ig domains forms a phosphorylation-sensitive complex with actin and myosin, suggesting that twitchin is the tether (Funabara, D., Osawa, R., Ueda, M., Kanoh, S., Hartshorne, D. J., and Watabe, S. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 18015-18020). Here we show that a region near the N terminus of twitchin also interacts with thick and thin filaments from Mytilus anterior byssus retractor muscles. Both a recombinant protein, including the D1 and DX phosphorylation sites with flanking 7th and 8th Ig domains, and a protein containing just the linker region bind to thin filaments with about a 1:1 mol ratio to actin and K(d) values of 1 and 15 μM, respectively. Both proteins show a decrease in binding when phosphorylated. The unphosphorylated proteins increase force in partially activated permeabilized muscles, suggesting that they are sufficient to tether thick and thin filaments. There are two sites of thin filament interaction in this region because both a 52-residue peptide surrounding the DX site and a 47-residue peptide surrounding the D1 site show phosphorylation-dependent binding to thin filaments. The peptides relax catch force, confirming the region's central role in the mechanism of catch. The multiple sites of thin filament interaction in the N terminus of twitchin in addition to those in the C terminus provide an especially secure and redundant mechanical link between thick and thin filaments in catch.     

Direct Measurements of Local Coupling between Myosin Molecules Are Consistent with a Model of Muscle Activation

Muscle contracts due to ATP-dependent interactions of myosin motors with thin filaments composed of the proteins actin, troponin, and tropomyosin. Contraction is initiated when calcium binds to troponin, which changes conformation and displaces tropomyosin, a filamentous protein that wraps around the actin filament, thereby exposing myosin binding sites on actin. Myosin motors interact with each other indirectly via tropomyosin, since myosin binding to actin locally displaces tropomyosin and thereby facilitates binding of nearby myosin. Defining and modeling this local coupling between myosin motors is an open problem in muscle modeling and, more broadly, a requirement to understanding the connection between muscle contraction at the molecular and macro scale. It is challenging to directly observe this coupling, and such measurements have only recently been made. Analysis of these data suggests that two myosin heads are required to activate the thin filament. This result contrasts with a theoretical model, which reproduces several indirect measurements of coupling between myosin, that assumes a single myosin head can activate the thin filament. To understand this apparent discrepancy, we incorporated the model into stochastic simulations of the experiments, which generated simulated data that were then analyzed identically to the experimental measurements. By varying a single parameter, good agreement between simulation and experiment was established. The conclusion that two myosin molecules are required to activate the thin filament arises from an assumption, made during data analysis, that the intensity of the fluorescent tags attached to myosin varies depending on experimental condition. We provide an alternative explanation that reconciles theory and experiment without assuming that the intensity of the fluorescent tags varies.