Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Natural Variation of Arabidopsis Root Architecture Reveals Complementing Adaptive Strategies to Potassium Starvation

Root architecture is a highly plastic and environmentally responsive trait that enables plants to counteract nutrient scarcities with different foraging strategies. In potassium (K) deficiency (low K), seedlings of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) reference accession Columbia (Col-0) show a strong reduction of lateral root elongation. To date, it is not clear whether this is a direct consequence of the lack of K as an osmoticum or a triggered response to maintain the growth of other organs under limiting conditions. In this study, we made use of natural variation within Arabidopsis to look for novel root architectural responses to low K. A comprehensive set of 14 differentially responding root parameters were quantified in K-starved and K-replete plants. We identified a phenotypic gradient that links two extreme strategies of morphological adaptation to low K arising from a major tradeoff between main root (MR) and lateral root elongation. Accessions adopting strategy I (e.g. Col-0) maintained MR growth but compromised lateral root elongation, whereas strategy II genotypes (e.g. Catania-1) arrested MR elongation in favor of lateral branching. K resupply and histochemical staining resolved the temporal and spatial patterns of these responses. Quantitative trait locus analysis of K-dependent root architectures within a Col-0 × Catania-1 recombinant inbred line population identified several loci each of which determined a particular subset of root architectural parameters. Our results indicate the existence of genomic hubs in the coordinated control of root growth in stress conditions and provide resources to facilitate the identification of the underlying genes.The ability of plants to actively respond to nutrient scarcity with changes in root architecture is a fascinating phenomenon. Advances in root research and breeding efforts that focus on the enhancement of root traits have been recognized as principal goals to ensure those high yields necessary to feed an ever-growing human population (Hammer et al., 2009; Den Herder et al., 2010). Indeed, understanding the adaptations of root systems to environmental factors has been pointed out as a key issue in modern agriculture (Den Herder et al., 2010).Potassium (K) is the quantitatively most important cation for plant growth, as it serves as the major osmoticum for cell expansion (Leigh and Wyn Jones, 1984; Amtmann et al., 2006). Moreover, K is essential for many cellular and tissue processes, such as enzymatic activity, transport of minerals and metabolites, and regulation of stomatal aperture (Amtmann et al., 2006). Even in fertilized fields, rapid K uptake by plants can lead to K shortage in the root environment, especially early in the growth season. Root adaptations to K deficiency (low K) take place at the physiological (Armengaud et al., 2004; Shin and Schachtman, 2004; Alemán et al., 2011), metabolic (Armengaud et al., 2009a), and morphological levels. In a classic study, Drew (1975) showed an increase in overall lateral root (LR) growth of barley seedlings, even when K was supplied only to parts of the root system. Conversely, a typical response of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Columbia (Col-0) seedlings to low K is the drastic reduction of LR elongation (Armengaud et al., 2004; Shin and Schachtman, 2004). Conflicting data have been published on the effect of low K on main root (MR) growth in the same species, ranging from no effect (Shin and Schachtman, 2004) to impaired MR elongation (Jung et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2010). Some components involved in K starvation responses have been identified, such as jasmonates (Armengaud et al., 2004, 2010), reactive oxygen species (Shin and Schachtman, 2004), and ethylene (Jung et al., 2009). However, the molecular identity of a root K sensor acting at the base of the signaling cascade is so far unknown.Genetic variation within species is a useful resource to dissect the genetic components determining phenotypes (Koornneef et al., 2004; Trontin et al., 2011; Weigel, 2012). Natural variation within Arabidopsis has been the basis for many studies on plant morphology, physiology, and development as well as stress response (Alonso-Blanco et al., 2009; Weigel, 2012). Natural variation of root traits such as primary root length (Mouchel et al., 2004; Loudet et al., 2005; Sergeeva et al., 2006), LR length (Loudet et al., 2005), and total root size (Fitz Gerald et al., 2006) have pinpointed genomic regions underlying the phenotypic variation via mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) as a first step toward the identification of novel regulatory genes (Mouchel et al., 2004). This strategy has also been applied to environmental responses, such as growth responses to phosphate starvation (Reymond et al., 2006; Svistoonoff et al., 2007). However, despite their importance for plant growth and their strong effect on overall root architecture, root responses to K deficiency have not been genetically dissected.Here, we show that Arabidopsis accessions follow different strategies to adapt to K starvation. We present the quantification of a comprehensive set of root architectural parameters of Arabidopsis grown in K-sufficient and K-deficient media and the identification of genetic loci, each of which determines the response of a distinct subset of root architectural parameters to K starvation.     

S-Nitrosylation of Ascorbate Peroxidase Is Part of Programmed Cell Death Signaling in Tobacco Bright Yellow-2 Cells

Nitric oxide (NO) is a small redox molecule that acts as a signal in different physiological and stress-related processes in plants. Recent evidence suggests that the biological activity of NO is also mediated by S-nitrosylation, a well-known redox-based posttranslational protein modification. Here, we show that during programmed cell death (PCD), induced by both heat shock (HS) or hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 cells, an increase in S-nitrosylating agents occurred. NO increased in both experimentally induced PCDs, although with different intensities. In H₂O₂-treated cells, the increase in NO was lower than in cells exposed to HS. However, a simultaneous increase in S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), another NO source for S-nitrosylation, occurred in H₂O₂-treated cells, while a decrease in this metabolite was evident after HS. Consistently, different levels of activity and expression of GSNO reductase, the enzyme responsible for GSNO removal, were found in cells subjected to the two different PCD-inducing stimuli: low in H₂O₂-treated cells and high in the heat-shocked ones. Irrespective of the type of S-nitrosylating agent, S-nitrosylated proteins formed upon exposure to both of the PCD-inducing stimuli. Interestingly, cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX), a key enzyme controlling H₂O₂ levels in plants, was found to be S-nitrosylated at the onset of both PCDs. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed that S-nitrosylation of cAPX was responsible for the rapid decrease in its activity. The possibility that S-nitrosylation induces cAPX ubiquitination and degradation and acts as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD is discussed.Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous and diffusible redox molecule that acts as a signaling compound in both animal and plant systems (Pacher et al., 2007; Besson-Bard et al., 2008). In plants, NO has been found to play a key role in several physiological processes, such as germination, lateral root development, flowering, senescence, stomatal closure, and growth of pollen tubes (Beligni and Lamattina, 2000; Neill et al., 2002; Correa-Aragunde et al., 2004; He et al., 2004; Prado et al., 2004; Carimi et al., 2005). In addition, NO has been reported to be involved in plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses (Leitner et al., 2009; Siddiqui et al., 2011) and in the signaling pathways leading to programmed cell death (PCD; Delledonne et al., 1998; de Pinto et al., 2006; De Michele et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2012; Serrano et al., 2012).The cellular environment may greatly influence the chemical reactivity of NO, giving rise to different biologically active NO-derived compounds, collectively named reactive nitrogen species, which amplify and differentiate its ability to activate physiological and stress-related processes. Many of the biological properties of NO are due to its high affinity with transition metals of metalloproteins as well as its reactivity with reactive oxygen species (ROS; Hill et al., 2010). However, recent evidence suggests that protein S-nitrosylation, due to the addition of NO to reactive Cys thiols, may act as a key mechanism of NO signaling in plants (Wang et al., 2006; Astier et al., 2011). NO is also able to react with reduced glutathione (GSH), the most abundant cellular thiol, thus producing S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), which also acts as an endogenous trans-nitrosylating agent. GSNO is also considered as a NO store and donor and, as it is more stable than NO, acts as a long-distance NO transporter through the floematic flux (Malik et al., 2011). S-Nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR), which is an enzyme conserved from bacteria to humans, has been suggested to play a role in regulating S-nitrosothiols (SNO) and the turnover of S-nitrosylated proteins in plants (Liu et al., 2001; Rusterucci et al., 2007).A number of proteins involved in metabolism, stress responses, and redox homeostasis have been identified as potential targets for S-nitrosylation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Lindermayr et al., 2005). During the hypersensitive response (HR), 16 proteins were identified to be S-nitrosylated in the seedlings of the same species (Romero-Puertas et al., 2008); in Citrus species, S-nitrosylation of about 50 proteins occurred in the NO-mediated resistance to high salinity (Tanou et al., 2009).However, while the number of candidate proteins for S-nitrosylation is increasing, the functional significance of protein S-nitrosylation has been explained only in a few cases, such as for nonsymbiotic hemoglobin (Perazzolli et al., 2004), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Lindermayr et al., 2005; Wawer et al., 2010), Met adenosyltransferase (Lindermayr et al., 2006), and metacaspase9 (Belenghi et al., 2007). Of particular interest are the cases in which S-nitrosylation involves enzymes controlling ROS homeostasis. For instance, it has been reported that S-nitrosylation of peroxiredoxin IIE regulates the antioxidant function of this enzyme and might contribute to the HR (Romero-Puertas et al., 2007). It has also been shown that in the immunity response, S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase inactivates the enzyme, thus reducing ROS production and controlling HR development (Yun et al., 2011).Recently, S-nitrosylation has also been shown to be involved in PCD of nitric oxide excess1 (noe1) rice (Oryza sativa) plants, which are mutated in the OsCATC gene coding for catalase (Lin et al., 2012). In these plants, which show PCD-like phenotypes under high-light conditions, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and thioredoxin are S-nitrosylated. This suggests that the NO-dependent regulation of these proteins is involved in plant PCD, similar to what occurs in animal apoptosis (Sumbayev, 2003; Hara et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2012). The increase in hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) after exposure to high light in noe1 plants is responsible for the production of NO required for leaf cell death induction (Lin et al., 2012). There is a strict relationship between H₂O₂ and NO in PCD activation (Delledonne et al., 2001; de Pinto et al., 2002); however, the mechanism of this interplay is largely still unknown (for review, see Zaninotto et al., 2006; Zhao, 2007; Yoshioka et al., 2011). NO can induce ROS production and vice versa, and their reciprocal modulation in terms of intensity and timing seems to be crucial in determining PCD activation and in controlling HR development (Delledonne et al., 2001; Zhao, 2007; Yun et al., 2011).In previous papers, we demonstrated that heat shock (HS) at 55°C and treatment with 50 mm H₂O₂ promote PCD in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells (Vacca et al., 2004; de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008). In both experimental conditions, NO production and decrease in cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX) were observed as early events in the PCD pathway, and cAPX decrease has been suggested to contribute to determining the redox environment required for PCD (de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008).In this study, the production of nitrosylating agents (NO and GSNO) in the first hours of PCD induction by HS or H₂O₂ treatment in tobacco BY-2 cells and their role in PCD were studied. The possibility that S-nitrosylation could be a first step in regulating cAPX activity and turnover as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD was also investigated.     

The Role of a Potassium Transporter OsHAK5 in Potassium Acquisition and Transport from Roots to Shoots in Rice at Low Potassium Supply Levels

In plants, K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) is the largest potassium (K) transporter family; however, few of the members have had their physiological functions characterized in planta. Here, we studied OsHAK5 of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice (Oryza sativa). We determined its cellular and tissue localization and analyzed its functions in rice using both OsHAK5 knockout mutants and overexpression lines in three genetic backgrounds. A β-glucuronidase reporter driven by the OsHAK5 native promoter indicated OsHAK5 expression in various tissue organs from root to seed, abundantly in root epidermis and stele, the vascular tissues, and mesophyll cells. Net K influx rate in roots and K transport from roots to aerial parts were severely impaired by OsHAK5 knockout but increased by OsHAK5 overexpression in 0.1 and 0.3 mm K external solution. The contribution of OsHAK5 to K mobilization within the rice plant was confirmed further by the change of K concentration in the xylem sap and K distribution in the transgenic lines when K was removed completely from the external solution. Overexpression of OsHAK5 increased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots and salt stress tolerance (shoot growth), while knockout of OsHAK5 decreased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots, resulting in sensitivity to salt stress. Taken together, these results demonstrate that OsHAK5 plays a major role in K acquisition by roots faced with low external K and in K upward transport from roots to shoots in K-deficient rice plants.Potassium (K) is one of the three most important macronutrients and the most abundant cation in plants. As a major osmoticum in the vacuole, K drives the generation of turgor pressure, enabling cell expansion. In the vascular tissue, K is an important participant in the generation of root pressure (for review, see Wegner, 2014 [including his new hypothesis]). In the phloem, K is critical for the transport of photoassimilates from source to sink (Marschner, 1996; Deeken et al., 2002; Gajdanowicz et al., 2011). In addition, enhancing K absorption and decreasing sodium (Na) accumulation is a major strategy of glycophytes in salt stress tolerance (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999; Munns and Tester, 2008; Shabala and Cuin, 2008).Plants acquire K through K-permeable proteins at the root surface. Since available K concentration in the soil may vary by 100-fold, plants have developed multiple K uptake systems for adapting to this variability (Epstein et al., 1963; Grabov, 2007; Maathuis, 2009). In a classic K uptake experiment in barley (Hordeum vulgare), root K absorption has been described as a high-affinity and low-affinity biphasic transport process (Epstein et al., 1963). It is generally assumed that the low-affinity transport system (LATS) in the roots mediates K uptake in the millimolar range and that the activity of this system is insensitive to external K concentration (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997; Chérel et al., 2014). In contrast, the high-affinity transport system (HATS) was rapidly up-regulated when the supply of exogenous K was halted (Glass, 1976; Glass and Dunlop, 1978).The membrane transporters for K flux identified in plants are generally classified into three channels and three transporter families based on phylogenetic analysis (Mäser et al., 2001; Véry and Sentenac, 2003; Lebaudy et al., 2007; Alemán et al., 2011). For K uptake, it was predicted that, under most circumstances, K transporters function as HATS, while K-permeable channels mediate LATS (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997). However, a root-expressed K channel in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), Arabidopsis K Transporter1 (AKT1), mediates K absorption over a wide range of external K concentrations (Sentenac et al., 1992; Lagarde et al., 1996; Hirsch et al., 1998; Spalding et al., 1999), while evidence is accumulating that many K transporters, including members of the K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) family, are low-affinity K transporters (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Senn et al., 2001), implying that functions of plant K channels and transporters overlap at different K concentration ranges.Out of the three families of K transporters, cation proton antiporter (CPA), high affinity K/Na transporter (HKT), and KT/HAK/KUP, CPA was characterized as a K⁺(Na⁺)/H⁺ antiporter, HKT may cotransport Na and K or transport Na only (Rubio et al., 1995; Uozumi et al., 2000), while KT/HAK/KUP were predicted to be H⁺-coupled K⁺ symporters (Mäser et al., 2001; Lebaudy et al., 2007). KT/HAK/KUP were named by different researchers who first identified and cloned them (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Santa-María et al., 1997). In plants, the KT/HAK/KUP family is the largest K transporter family, including 13 members in Arabidopsis and 27 members in the rice (Oryza sativa) genome (Rubio et al., 2000; Mäser et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2008). Sequence alignments show that genes of this family share relatively low homology to each other. The KT/HAK/KUP family was divided into four major clusters (Rubio et al., 2000; Gupta et al., 2008), and in cluster I and II, they were further separated into A and B groups. Genes of cluster I or II likely exist in all plants, cluster III is composed of genes from both Arabidopsis and rice, while cluster IV includes only four rice genes (Grabov, 2007; Gupta et al., 2008).The functions of KT/HAK/KUP were studied mostly in heterologous expression systems. Transporters of cluster I, such as AtHAK5, HvHAK1, OsHAK1, and OsHAK5, are localized in the plasma membrane (Kim et al., 1998; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gierth et al., 2005) and exhibit high-affinity K uptake in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Santa-María et al., 1997; Fu and Luan, 1998; Rubio et al., 2000) and in Escherichia coli (Horie et al., 2011). Transporters of cluster II, like AtKUP4 (TINY ROOT HAIRS1, TRH1), HvHAK2, OsHAK2, OsHAK7, and OsHAK10, could not complement the K uptake-deficient yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but were able to mediate K fluxes in a bacterial mutant; they might be tonoplast transporters (Senn et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Navarro and Rubio, 2006). The function of transporters in clusters III and IV is even less known (Grabov, 2007).Existing data suggest that some KT/HAK/KUP transporters also may respond to salinity stress (Maathuis, 2009). The cluster I transporters of HvHAK1 mediate Na influx (Santa-María et al., 1997), while AtHAK5 expression is inhibited by Na (Rubio et al., 2000; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010). Expression of OsHAK5 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY2 cells enhanced the salt tolerance of these cells by accumulating more K without affecting their Na content (Horie et al., 2011).There are only scarce reports on the physiological function of KT/HAK/KUP in planta. In Arabidopsis, mutation of AtKUP2 (SHORT HYPOCOTYL3) resulted in a short hypocotyl, small leaves, and a short flowering stem (Elumalai et al., 2002), while a loss-of-function mutation of AtKUP4 (TRH1) resulted in short root hairs and a loss of gravity response in the root (Rigas et al., 2001; Desbrosses et al., 2003; Ahn et al., 2004). AtHAK5 is the only system currently known to mediate K uptake at concentrations below 0.01 mm (Rubio et al., 2010) and provides a cesium uptake pathway (Qi et al., 2008). AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 are the two major physiologically relevant molecular entities mediating K uptake into roots in the range between 0.01 and 0.05 mm (Pyo et al., 2010; Rubio et al., 2010). AtAKT1 may contribute to K uptake within the K concentrations that belong to the high-affinity system described by Epstein et al. (1963).Among all 27 members of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice, OsHAK1, OsHAK5, OsHAK19, and OsHAK20 were grouped in cluster IB (Gupta et al., 2008). These four rice HAK members share 50.9% to 53.4% amino acid identity with AtHAK5. OsHAK1 was expressed in the whole plant, with maximum expression in roots, and was up-regulated by K deficiency; it mediated high-affinity K uptake in yeast (Bañuelos et al., 2002). In this study, we examined the tissue-specific localization and the physiological functions of OsHAK5 in response to variation in K supply and to salt stress in rice. By comparing K uptake and translocation in OsHAK5 knockout (KO) mutants and in OsHAK5-overexpressing lines with those in their respective wild-type lines supplied with different K concentrations, we found that OsHAK5 not only mediates high-affinity K acquisition but also participates in root-to-shoot K transport as well as in K-regulated salt tolerance.     

Plasticity of the Arabidopsis Root System under Nutrient Deficiencies

Plant roots show a particularly high variation in their morphological response to different nutrient deficiencies. Although such changes often determine the nutrient efficiency or stress tolerance of plants, it is surprising that a comprehensive and comparative analysis of root morphological responses to different nutrient deficiencies has not yet been conducted. Since one reason for this is an inherent difficulty in obtaining nutrient-deficient conditions in agar culture, we first identified conditions appropriate for producing nutrient-deficient plants on agar plates. Based on a careful selection of agar specifically for each nutrient being considered, we grew Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants at four levels of deficiency for 12 nutrients and quantified seven root traits. In combination with measurements of biomass and elemental concentrations, we observed that the nutritional status and type of nutrient determined the extent and type of changes in root system architecture (RSA). The independent regulation of individual root traits further pointed to a differential sensitivity of root tissues to nutrient limitations. To capture the variation in RSA under different nutrient supplies, we used principal component analysis and developed a root plasticity chart representing the overall modulations in RSA under a given treatment. This systematic comparison of RSA responses to nutrient deficiencies provides a comprehensive view of the overall changes in root plasticity induced by the deficiency of single nutrients and provides a solid basis for the identification of nutrient-sensitive steps in the root developmental program.Plant survival and performance are highly dependent on the plant’s ability to efficiently explore the soil in the search for water and minerals. Thus, root growth and architecture are extremely relevant for the plant’s adaptation to the growth medium, as they determine the soil volume that a plant is able to explore at a given time. Root system architecture (RSA) represents the spatial arrangement of roots of different ages and orders (Lynch, 1995; Osmont et al., 2007) and is determined by genetic factors and the integration of environmental cues (Malamy, 2005). The genetic component determines the fundamental morphology and blueprint of a plant’s root system, whereas environmental cues shape root architecture by modifying the intrinsic genetic program. The existence of this additional level of regulation allows plants to display a high level of root plasticity, which reflects the shape, three-dimensional distribution, branching pattern, and age of the primary and postembryonically generated roots (Pacheco-Villalobos and Hardtke, 2012). The dynamic modulation of RSA is based on the intrinsic developmental nature of the different components of the root system. In fact, the primary root (PR) is established during embryogenesis, while the lateral roots (LRs) that originate from the PR develop postembryonically (Osmont et al., 2007; Péret et al., 2009). These highly dynamic changes in the overall RSA throughout time finally determine root plasticity and allow plants to efficiently adapt to environmental constraints.Nutrient availability can exert a profound impact on RSA by altering the number, length, angle, and diameter of roots and root hairs (for review, see Forde and Lorenzo, 2001; López-Bucio et al., 2003; Malamy, 2005; Osmont et al., 2007). In fact, plants can respond to the heterogenous availability of resources by allocating roots where the most favorable conditions are found (Zhang and Forde, 1998; Linkohr et al., 2002; Remans et al., 2006; Lima et al., 2010; Giehl et al., 2012). When grown under limited phosphorus (P) availability, roots exhibit a shallower architecture that results from the inhibition of PR elongation and the concomitant increase in LR formation (Williamson et al., 2001; López-Bucio et al., 2002; Sanchez-Calderon et al., 2005). Such an architectural rearrangement of the root is thought to improve the plant’s ability to forage P from the usually P-enriched topsoil horizon (Lynch and Brown, 2001; Rubio et al., 2003; Zhu et al., 2005). In contrast to low P, reduced nitrogen (N) availability stimulates PR and particularly LR elongation but not LR initiation (Linkohr et al., 2002; López-Bucio et al., 2003). However, it is noteworthy that under severe N shortage, LR formation is almost completely absent (Krouk et al., 2010), suggesting that plants require a certain level of N to sustain an active foraging strategy. These examples indicate that the availability of different nutrients can evoke distinct effects on RSA that depend upon which nutrient is supplied and the concentration of the supplied nutrient.Unfortunately, for the majority of the nutrients, a more detailed analysis of the architectural modifications under deficient conditions is still missing. In fact, most studies describe the effect of nutrient deficiencies on root growth and development only in terms of root biomass or total root length (Hermans and Verbruggen, 2005; Hermans et al., 2006; Richard-Molard et al., 2008; Jung et al., 2009; Cailliatte et al., 2010). Thus, important features of the root system are not comprehensible from these rather basic measurements. The characterization of RSA in more detail appears justified due to the positive correlations found between single root characteristics and plant yield, especially when the supply of water or mineral resources was limited (Landi et al., 2002; Tuberosa et al., 2002; Manschadi et al., 2006; Kirkegaard et al., 2007; Steele et al., 2007). Although a large number of studies have been conducted on the root development of grasses (Hochholdinger and Tuberosa, 2009; Iyer-Pascuzzi et al., 2010; Pacheco-Villalobos and Hardtke, 2012), our understanding of the molecular players involved in the regulation of root growth and development has benefited most from studies of the reference plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) grown under controlled conditions to minimize variability. However, imposing consistent nutrient deficiencies presents an experimental challenge as long as plants are grown on agar medium, which is the method of choice to preserve the spatial arrangement of the root system and access a larger number of root traits.A major drawback of agar and agarose media is their inherent nutrient load, such that traces of nutrient contamination must often be made unavailable to plants, for example by adding chelating agents to lower the free activities of micronutrients (Bell et al., 1991; Yang et al., 1994; Rengel, 1999). Additionally, in many cases, symptoms of deficiency are only observed in mutants impaired in the uptake of the nutrient in question (Tomatsu et al., 2007; Mills et al., 2008; Assunção et al., 2010). In general, gelling agents may contribute considerable amounts of nutrients (Debergh, 1983; Scholten and Pierik, 1998), hampering the occurrence of deficiency for specific nutrients (Jain et al., 2009). Thus, it becomes crucial to select the most suitable gelling agent when particular nutrient deficiencies are to be obtained. This is particularly relevant as strategies depending upon the use of gelling media are being developed to overcome the bottleneck that often limits RSA traits from being characterized in high-throughput phenotyping studies (Iyer-Pascuzzi et al., 2010; Clark et al., 2011).In our approach to compare RSA under different nutrient deficiencies in Arabidopsis plants grown on solid medium, we first identified the most appropriate conditions for producing nutrient-deficient plants on agar plates. Once identified, these conditions allowed us to characterize the effects of 12 deficiencies at four intensity levels on the RSA by measuring seven root traits. These measurements, in combination with biomass and elemental concentrations, allowed us to determine the nutrient-specific effects on particular parameters of the RSA and thus to describe the root plasticity of Arabidopsis and analyze the underlying traits under different nutrient deficiencies.     

Responses of Arabidopsis and Wheat to Rising CO2 Depend on Nitrogen Source and Nighttime CO2 Levels

A major contributor to the global carbon cycle is plant respiration. Elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentrations may either accelerate or decelerate plant respiration for reasons that have been uncertain. We recently established that elevated CO₂ during the daytime decreases plant mitochondrial respiration in the light and protein concentration because CO₂ slows the daytime conversion of nitrate (NO₃−) into protein. This derives in part from the inhibitory effect of CO₂ on photorespiration and the dependence of shoot NO₃− assimilation on photorespiration. Elevated CO₂ also inhibits the translocation of nitrite into the chloroplast, a response that influences shoot NO₃− assimilation during both day and night. Here, we exposed Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants to daytime or nighttime elevated CO₂ and supplied them with NO₃− or ammonium as a sole nitrogen (N) source. Six independent measures (plant biomass, shoot NO₃−, shoot organic N, ¹⁵N isotope fractionation, ¹⁵NO₃⁻ assimilation, and the ratio of shoot CO₂ evolution to O₂ consumption) indicated that elevated CO₂ at night slowed NO₃− assimilation and thus decreased dark respiration in the plants reliant on NO₃−. These results provide a straightforward explanation for the diverse responses of plants to elevated CO₂ at night and suggest that soil N source will have an increasing influence on the capacity of plants to mitigate human greenhouse gas emissions.The CO₂ concentration in Earth’s atmosphere has increased from about 270 to 400 µmol mol^–1 since 1800, and may double before the end of the century (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013). Plant responses to such increases are highly variable, but plant nitrogen (N) concentrations generally decline under elevated CO₂ (Cotrufo et al., 1998; Long et al., 2004). One explanation for this decline is that CO₂ inhibits nitrate (NO₃−) assimilation into protein in the shoots of C₃ plants during the daytime (Bloom et al., 2002, 2010, 2012, 2014; Cheng et al., 2012; Pleijel and Uddling, 2012; Myers et al., 2014; Easlon et al., 2015; Pleijel and Högy, 2015). This derives in part from the inhibitory effect of CO₂ on photorespiration (Foyer et al., 2009) and the dependence of shoot NO₃− assimilation on photorespiration (Rachmilevitch et al., 2004; Bloom, 2015).A key factor in global carbon budgets is plant respiration at night (Amthor, 1991; Farrar and Williams, 1991; Drake et al., 1999; Leakey et al., 2009). Nighttime elevated CO₂ may inhibit, have a negligible effect on, or stimulate dark respiration, depending on the plant species (Bunce, 2001, 2003; Wang and Curtis, 2002), plant development stage (Wang et al., 2001; Li et al., 2013), experimental approach (Griffin et al., 1999; Baker et al., 2000; Hamilton et al., 2001; Bruhn et al., 2002; Jahnke and Krewitt, 2002; Bunce, 2004), and total N supply (Markelz et al., 2014). The current study is, to our knowledge, the first to examine the influence of N source, NO₃− versus ammonium (NH₄+), on plant dark respiration at elevated CO₂ during the night.Plant organic N compounds account for less than 5% of the total dry weight of a plant, but conversion of NO₃− into organic N expends about 25% of the total energy in shoots (Bloom et al., 1989) and roots (Bloom et al., 1992). During the day, photorespiration supplies a portion of the energy (Rachmilevitch et al., 2004; Foyer et al., 2009), but at night, this energetic cost is borne entirely by the respiration of C substrates (Amthor, 1995) and may divert a substantial amount of reductant from the mitochondrial electron transport chain (Cousins and Bloom, 2004). The relative importance of NO₃− assimilation at night versus the day, however, is still a matter of intense debate (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2010). Here, we estimated NO₃− assimilation using several independent methods and show in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and wheat (Triticum aestivum), two diverse C₃ plants, that NO₃− assimilation at night can be substantial, and that elevated CO₂ at night inhibits this process.