PNRC1核定位信号序列的鉴定

为鉴定富含脯氨酸核受体辅调节蛋白1(PNRC1)分子的核定位信号序列（nuclear localization signal sequence, NLS）,在生物信息学方法预测的基础上,先构建野生型PNRC1及删除预测NLS的PNRC1突变体的绿色荧光蛋白（GFP）重组表达载体,转染细胞后通过激光共聚焦显微镜观察PNRC1分子在删除预测NLS后细胞内的定位变化.然后,将预测的NLS编码序列直接连到GFP表达载体上,以及将预测的NLS加到胞浆蛋白上构建其GFP重组表达载体,转染细胞,观察预测的NLS能否把构建的重组体都带到细胞核内.结果显示,删除PNRC1中预测的NLS后,其定位从细胞核中变为主要定位在细胞浆中,而预测的NLS能把GFP或胞浆中的蛋白带到细胞核中.研究表明,预测的NLS为PNRC1分子真正的NLS.     

BCR binds to the xeroderma pigmentosum group B protein.

The BCR gene is involved in the formation of the BCR-ABL oncogene responsible for the pathogenesis of Philadelphia chromosome-positive human leukemias. We have previously shown that P210 BCR-ABL binds to the xeroderma pigmentosum group B protein (XPB) through the portion of BCR that is homologous to the catalytic domain of GDP-GTP exchangers such as yeast CDC24 and Dbl. In the baculovirus overexpression system which facilitates binding of coexpressed proteins, we now show that XPB binds to the intact BCR protein efficiently but not to CDC24 or Dbl, suggesting specificity of this interaction. The binding of endogenous BCR and XPB proteins was also detected in Hela cells, and this was inhibited by a blocking peptide. Full-length (1-782) XPB and its truncated form (203-782), which does not contain the nuclear localization signal, were tagged with glutathione S-transferase (GST) and were expressed in Rat1 fibroblasts. GST-XPB(203-782) was localized predominantly in the cytoplasm and bound to BCR but not to p62, one of the other components in TFIIH. GST-XPB(1-782) was largely in the nucleus and bound to p62 and BCR. Although the biological significance of the binding remains to be uncovered, BCR binds to the XPB/p62 complex.     

Molecular insights into the recruitment of TFIIH to sites of DNA damage

XPB and XPD subunits of TFIIH are central genome caretakers involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER), although their respective role within this DNA repair pathway remains difficult to delineate. To obtain insight into the function of XPB and XPD, we studied cell lines expressing XPB or XPD ATPase‐deficient complexes. We show the involvement of XPB, but not XPD, in the accumulation of TFIIH to sites of DNA damage. Recruitment of TFIIH occurs independently of the helicase activity of XPB, but requires two recently identified motifs, a R‐E‐D residue loop and a Thumb‐like domain. Furthermore, we show that these motifs are specifically involved in the DNA‐induced stimulation of the ATPase activity of XPB. Together, our data demonstrate that the recruitment of TFIIH to sites of damage is an active process, under the control of the ATPase motifs of XPB and suggest that this subunit functions as an ATP‐driven hook to stabilize the binding of the TFIIH to damaged DNA.     

Tumor suppressor p53 dependent recruitment of nucleotide excision repair factors XPC and TFIIH to DNA damage

Functional tumor suppressor p53 is mainly required for efficient global genomic repair (GGR), a subpathway of nucleotide excisions repair (NER). In this study, the regulatory effect of p53, on the spaciotemporal recruitment of XPC and TFIIH to DNA damage sites, was investigated in repair-proficient and -deficient human cells in situ. Photoproducts were induced through micropore UV irradiation of discrete subnuclear areas of intact cells and the specific lesions, as well as recruited repair factors, were detected by immunofluorescent intensity and density of the damaged DNA subnuclear spots (SNS). Both cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and 6-4 photoproducts (6-4PP) were visualized in situ at SNS within irradiated nuclear foci. The in situ repair kinetics revealed that p53-WT normal fibroblasts are proficient for the repair of both CPD and 6-4PP, whereas, p53-Null Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) fibroblasts fail to efficiently repair CPD but not 6-4PP. Colocalization experiments of the NER factors showed that in normal human cells, XPC and TFIIH are rapidly and efficiently recruited to DNA damage within SNS. By contrast, recruitment of both XPC and TFIIH to DNA damage in SNS occurred much less efficiently in p53-Null or p53-compromised cells. The total cellular levels of XPC and XPB were similar in both p53-WT and -Null cells and remained unchanged up to 24h following UV irradiation. The results also showed that dispersal of recruited XPC and TFIIH from DNA damage SNS occurs within a short period after DNA damage. Such dispersal requires functional XPA, XPF and XPG proteins. Taken together, the results demonstrated that p53 plays a pronounced role in the damage recognition and subsequent assembly of repair machinery during GGR and the recruitment of XPC and TFIIH to CPD is p53-dependent. Most likely mechanism of this p53 action is through its downstream effector protein, DDB2.