Detection and localization of a chloroplast-encoded HU-like protein that organizes chloroplast nucleoids

Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) is packed into discrete structures called chloroplast nucleoids (cp-nucleoids). The structure of cpDNA is thought to be important for its maintenance and regulation. In bacteria and mitochondria, histone-like proteins (such as HU and Abf2, respectively) are abundant and play important roles in DNA organization. However, a primary structural protein has yet to be found in cp-nucleoids. Here, we identified an abundant DNA binding protein from isolated cp-nucleoids of the primitive red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae. The purified protein had sequence homology with the bacterial histone-like protein HU, and it complemented HU-lacking Escherichia coli mutants. The protein, called HC (histone-like protein of chloroplast), was encoded by a single gene (CmhupA) in the C. merolae chloroplast genome. Using immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy, we demonstrated that HC was distributed uniformly throughout the entire cp-nucleoid. The protein was expressed constitutively throughout the cell and the chloroplast division cycle, and it was able to condense DNA. These results indicate that HC, a bacteria-derived histone-like protein, primarily organizes cpDNA into the nucleoid.     

Structural plasticity and thermal stability of the histone-like protein from Spiroplasma melliferum are due to phenylalanine insertions into the conservative scaffold

The histone-like (HU) protein is one of the major nucleoid-associated proteins of the bacterial nucleoid, which shares high sequence and structural similarity with IHF but differs from the latter in DNA-specificity. Here, we perform an analysis of structural-dynamic properties of HU protein from Spiroplasma melliferum and compare its behavior in solution to that of another mycoplasmal HU from Mycoplasma gallisepticum. The high-resolution heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy was coupled with molecular-dynamics study and comparative analysis of thermal denaturation of both mycoplasmal HU proteins. We suggest that stacking interactions in two aromatic clusters in the HUSpm dimeric interface determine not only high thermal stability of the protein, but also its structural plasticity experimentally observed as slow conformational exchange. One of these two centers of stacking interactions is highly conserved among the known HU and IHF proteins. Second aromatic core described recently in IHFs and IHF-like proteins is considered as a discriminating feature of IHFs. We performed an electromobility shift assay to confirm high affinities of HUSpm to both normal and distorted dsDNA, which are the characteristics of HU protein. MD simulations of HUSpm with alanine mutations of the residues forming the non-conserved aromatic cluster demonstrate its role in dimer stabilization, as both partial and complete distortion of the cluster enhances local flexibility of HUSpm.     

The looped domain organization of the nucleoid in histone-like protein defective Escherichia coli strains.

We have investigated the major Escherichia coli histone-like proteins (H-NS, HU, FIS, and IHF) as putative factors involved in the maintenance of the overall DNA looped arrangement of the bacterial nucleoid. The long-range architecture of the chromosome has been studied by means of an assay based on in vivo genomic fragmentation mediated by endogenous DNA gyrase in the presence of oxolinic acid. The fragmentation products were analysed by CHEF electrophoresis. The results indicate that in vivo a large fraction of the bacterial chromatin constitutes an adequate substrate for the enzyme. DNA fragments released upon oxo-treatment span a size range from about 1000 kb to a limit-size of about 50 kb. The latter value is in excellent agreement with the average size reported for bacterial chromosomal domains. The DNA gyrase-mediated fragmentation does not appear to be significantly altered in strains depleted in histone-like proteins as compared to an E. coli wild type strain. This suggests that these proteins may not represent critical determinants for the maintenance of the supercoiled loop organisation of the E. coli chromosome.     

Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of a gene,hup, encoding the histone-like protein HU of Bifidobacterium longum

A genomic DNA library of Bifidobacterium longum ATCC15707 was transfected into an Escherichia coli strain deficient in both HU and IHF, the growth of which is cold-sensitive because of the deficiency in these proteins. Cold-resistant colonies were selected and the DNA was cloned and sequenced. A polypeptide consisted of 93 amino acids, a predicted molecular mass of 9983 Da with an isoelectric point of 10.35, was deduced from an orf in the middle of the DNA fragment. The amino acid sequence was highly similar to HU family proteins, and 26 aas of N terminal was identical to a histone-like protein, HBI, a HU family protein of B. longum. Incapabilities of Mu phage propagation in an E. coli mutant deficient in HU or IHF could be suppressed by DNA bearing this orf. These results showed that the orf is a gene hup encoding HBI, a histone-like protein HU of B. longum.     

The Escherichia coli histone-like protein HU affects DNA initiation, chromosome partitioning via MukB, and cell division via MinCDE.

Escherichia coli hupA hupB double mutants, lacking both subunits (HU1 and HU2) of the histone-like protein HU, accumulate secondary mutations. In some genetic backgrounds, these include mutations in the minCDE operon, inactivating this system of septation control and resulting in the formation of minicells. In the course of the characterization of hupA hupB mutants, we observed that the simultaneous absence of the HU2 subunit and the MukB protein, implicated in chromosome partitioning, is lethal for the bacteria; the integrity of either HU or MukB thus seems to be essential for bacterial growth. The HU protein has been shown to be involved in DNA replication in vitro; we show here that its inactivation in the hupA hupB double mutant disturbs the synchrony of replication initiation in vivo, as evaluated by flow cytometry. Our results suggest that global nucleoid structure, determined in part by the histone-like protein HU, plays a role in DNA replication initiation, in proper chromosome partitioning directed by the MukFEB proteins, and in correct septum placement directed by the MinCDE proteins.     

Twelve species of the nucleoid-associated protein from Escherichia coli. Sequence recognition specificity and DNA binding affinity.

The genome of Escherichia coli is composed of a single molecule of circular DNA with the length of about 47,000 kilobase pairs, which is associated with about 10 major DNA-binding proteins, altogether forming the nucleoid. We expressed and purified 12 species of the DNA-binding protein, i.e. CbpA (curved DNA-binding protein A), CbpB or Rob (curved DNA-binding protein B or right arm of the replication origin binding protein), DnaA (DNA-binding protein A), Dps (DNA-binding protein from starved cells), Fis (factor for inversion stimulation), Hfq (host factor for phage Q(beta)), H-NS (histone-like nucleoid structuring protein), HU (heat-unstable nucleoid protein), IciA (inhibitor of chromosome initiation A), IHF (integration host factor), Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein), and StpA (suppressor of td(-) phenotype A). The sequence specificity of DNA binding was determined for all the purified nucleoid proteins using gel-mobility shift assays. Five proteins (CbpB, DnaA, Fis, IHF, and Lrp) were found to bind to specific DNA sequences, while the remaining seven proteins (CbpA, Dps, Hfq, H-NS, HU, IciA, and StpA) showed apparently sequence-nonspecific DNA binding activities. Four proteins, CbpA, Hfq, H-NS, and IciA, showed the binding preference for the curved DNA. From the apparent dissociation constant (K(d)) determined using the sequence-specific or nonspecific DNA probes, the order of DNA binding affinity were determined to be: HU > IHF > Lrp > CbpB(Rob) > Fis > H-NS > StpA > CbpA > IciA > Hfq/Dps, ranging from 25 nM (HU binding to the non-curved DNA) to 250 nM (Hfq binding to the non-curved DNA), under the assay conditions employed.     

Does the parallel evolution pattern between the replication-segregation proteins and HU have a biological significance?

The bacterial chromosome is a highly compacted nucleoproteic structure. Its apparent disordered morphology is difficult to conciliate with newly discovered mechanisms governing the propagation of genetic information between mother and daughter cells. Recent experiments in bacterial genetics, biochemistry and cytology from a number of laboratories are beginning to unravel how at each cell division, DNA replication and segregation proteins interact spatially with specific DNA motifs to orchestrate replication and movement of replication forks and chromosomes. We propose here a method to confirm and perhaps extend these experiments by in silico protein sequence comparisons and phylogeny. This analysis showed a parallel evolution between the histone-like protein HU and key protein factors involved in DNA replication and chromosome segregation.     

Enhanced conformational flexibility of the histone-like (HU) protein from Mycoplasma gallisepticum

The histone-like (HU) protein is one of the major nucleoid-associated proteins involved in DNA supercoiling and compaction into bacterial nucleoid as well as in all DNA-dependent transactions. This small positively charged dimeric protein binds DNA in a non-sequence specific manner promoting DNA super-structures. The majority of HU proteins are highly conserved among bacteria; however, HU protein from Mycoplasma gallisepticum (HUMgal) has multiple amino acid substitutions in the most conserved regions, which are believed to contribute to its specificity to DNA targets unusual for canonical HU proteins. In this work, we studied the structural dynamic properties of the HUMgal dimer by NMR spectroscopy and MD simulations. The obtained all-atom model displays compliance with the NMR data and confirms the heterogeneous backbone flexibility of HUMgal. We found that HUMgal, being folded into a dimeric conformation typical for HU proteins, has a labile α-helical body with protruded β-stranded arms forming DNA-binding domain that are highly flexible in the absence of DNA. The amino acid substitutions in conserved regions of the protein are likely to affect the conformational lability of the HUMgal dimer that can be responsible for complex functional behavior of HUMgal in vivo, e.g. facilitating its spatial adaptation to non-canonical DNA-targets.     

Effects of the nucleoid protein HU on the structure, flexibility, and ring-closure properties of DNA deduced from Monte Carlo simulations

The histone-like HU (heat unstable) protein plays a key role in the organization and regulation of the Escherichia coli genome. The nonspecific nature of HU binding to DNA complicates analysis of the mechanism by which the protein contributes to the looping of DNA. Conventional models of the looping of HU-bound duplexes attribute the changes in biophysical properties of DNA brought about by the random binding of protein to changes in the effective parameters of an ideal helical wormlike chain. Here, we introduce a novel Monte Carlo approach to study the effects of nonspecific HU binding on the configurational properties of DNA directly. We randomly decorated segments of an ideal double-helical DNA with HU molecules that induce the bends and other structural distortions of the double helix find in currently available X-ray structures. We find that the presence of HU at levels approximating those found in the cell reduces the persistence length by roughly threefold compared with that of naked DNA. The binding of protein has particularly striking effects on the cyclization properties of short duplexes, altering the dependence of ring closure on chain length in a way that cannot be mimicked by a simple wormlike model and accumulating at higher-than-expected levels on successfully closed chains. Moreover, the uptake of protein on small minicircles depends on chain length, taking advantage of the HU-induced deformations of DNA structure to facilitate ligation. Circular duplexes with bound HU show much greater propensity than protein-free DNA to exist as negatively supercoiled topoisomers, suggesting a potential role of HU in organizing the bacterial nucleoid. The local bending and undertwisting of DNA by HU, in combination with the number of bound proteins, provide a structural rationale for the condensation of DNA and the observed expression levels of reporter genes in vivo.     

Concentration-dependent organization of DNA by the dinoflagellate histone-like protein HCc3

The liquid crystalline chromosomes of dinoflagellates are the alternative to the nucleosome-based organization of chromosomes in the eukaryotes. These nucleosome-less chromosomes have to devise novel ways to maintain active parts of the genome. The dinoflagellate histone-like protein HCc3 has significant sequence identity with the bacterial DNA-binding protein HU. HCc3 also has a secondary structure resembling HU in silico. We have examined HCc3 in its recombinant form. Experiments on DNA-cellulose revealed its DNA-binding activity is on the C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain is responsible for intermolecular oligomerization as demonstrated by cross-linking studies. However, HCc3 could not complement Escherichia coli HU-deficient mutants, suggesting functional differences. In ligation assays, HCc3-induced DNA concatenation but not ring closure as the DNA-bending HU does. The basic HCc3 was an efficient DNA condensing agent, but it did not behave like an ordinary polycationic compound. HCc3 also induced specific structures with DNA in a concentration-dependent manner, as demonstrated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). At moderate concentration of HCc3, DNA bridging and bundling were observed; at high concentrations, the complexes were even more condensed. These results are consistent with a biophysical role for HCc3 in maintaining extended DNA loops at the periphery of liquid crystalline chromosomes.     

Role of HU and DNA supercoiling in transcription repression: specialized nucleoprotein repression complex at gal promoters in Escherichia coli

Efficient repression of the two promoters P1 and P2 of the gal operon requires the formation of a DNA loop encompassing the promoters. In vitro, DNA looping-mediated repression involves binding of the Gal repressor (GalR) to two gal operators (OE and OI) and binding of the histone-like protein HU to a specific locus (hbs) about the midpoint between OE and OI, and supercoiled DNA. Without DNA looping, GalR binding to OE partially represses P1 and stimulates P2. We investigated the requirement for DNA supercoiling and HU in repression of the gal promoters in vivo in strains containing a fusion of a reporter gene, gusA or lacZ, to each promoter individually. While the P1 promoter was found to be repressible in the absence of DNA supercoiling and HU, the repression of P2 was entirely dependent upon DNA supercoiling in vivo. The P2 promoter was fully derepressed when supercoiling was inhibited by the addition of coumermycin in cells. P2, but not P1, was also totally derepressed by the absence of HU or the OI operator. From these results, we propose that the repression of the gal promoters in vivo is mediated by the formation of a higher order DNA-multiprotein complex containing GalR, HU and supercoiled DNA. In the absence of this complex, P1 but not P2 is still repressed by GalR binding to OE. The specific nucleoprotein complexes involving histone-like proteins, which repress promoter activity while remaining sensitive to inducing signals, as discussed, may occur more generally in bacterial nucleoids.     

Evidence for bacterial origin of heat shock RNA-1

The heat shock RNA-1 (HSR1) is a noncoding RNA (ncRNA) reported to be involved in mammalian heat shock response. HSR1 was shown to significantly stimulate the heat-shock factor 1 (HSF1) trimerization and DNA binding. The hamster HSR1 sequence was reported to consist of 604 nucleotides (nt) plus a poly(A) tail and to have only a 4-nt difference with the human HSR1. In this study, we present highly convincing evidence for bacterial origin of the HSR1. No HSR1 sequence was found by exhaustive sequence similarity searches of the publicly available eukaryotic nucleotide sequence databases at the NCBI, including the expressed sequence tags, genome survey sequences, and high-throughput genomic sequences divisions of GenBank, as well as the Trace Archive database of whole genome shotgun sequences, and genome assemblies. Instead, a putative open reading frame (ORF) of HSR1 revealed strong similarity to the amino-terminal region of bacterial chloride channel proteins. Furthermore, the 5′ flanking region of the putative HSR1 ORF showed similarity to the 5′ upstream regions of the bacterial protein genes. We propose that the HSR1 was derived from a bacterial genome fragment either by horizontal gene transfer or by bacterial infection of the cells. The most probable source organism of the HSR1 is a species belonging to the order Burkholderiales.     

The protein HU can displace the LexA repressor from its DNA-binding sites

The major bacterial histone-like protein HU is a small, basic, dimeric protein composed of two closely related subunits. HU is involved in several processes in the bacterial cell such as the initiation of replication, transposition, gene inversion and cell division. It has been suggested that HU could introduce structural changes to the DNA which would facilitate or inhibit the binding of regulatory proteins to their specific sites. In this study we investigated the effect of HU on the binding of LexA protein, the regulator of SOS functions, to three of its specific binding sites. We show that HU can displace LexA from its binding sites on the operators of the lexA, recA and sfiA genes. The lexA operator was the most sensitive while the higher affinity sfiA operator was the least sensitive. Since HU, like its homologue IHF, probably binds DNA in the minor groove we tested the effect of distamycin, a drug which binds to the minor groove, on LexA binding. Like HU, this drug disrupted LexA–operator complexes. These results suggest that distortion of the minor groove of the lexA operators excludes the binding of the repressor to the major groove.