Cell-cycle-dependent dissociation of histone H1 from chromatin in nuclei of P. polycephalum.

The dissociation curves of histone H1 from chromatin in interphase and metaphase nuclei from Physarum polycephalum have been determined using CaCl2 as dissociating agent. H1 is less strongly bound to metaphase chromosomes than to interphase chromatin. However, no differences could be detected in the binding of Hl to early S, late S or G2 phase chromatin. The number of CaCl2 molecules involved in binding one H1 molecule to chromatin was reduced from 5 in interphase to 4 in metaphase. The non-electrostatic contribution to the free-energy of binding was small in both cases. A comparison of the binding properties of H1 to sheared chromatin, native chromatin and metaphase chromosomes suggests that the electrostatic binding functions of H1 are completely satisfied within the nucleosome and that further electrostatic interactions are not involved in folding the nucleosomal fibre into the 300 A "solenoid" or the more tightly folded metaphase chromosome.     

Low angle x-ray diffraction studies of HeLa metaphase chromosomes: effects of histone phosphorylation and chromosome isolation procedure

To test whether gross changes in chromatin structure occur during the cell cycle, we compared HeLa mitotic metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei by low angle x-ray diffraction. Interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes differ only in the 30-40-nm packing reflection, but not in the higher angle part of the x-ray diffraction pattern. Our interpretation of these results is that the transition to metaphase affects only the packing of chromatin fibers and not, to the resolution of our method, the internal structure of nucleosomes or the pattern of nucleosome packing within chromatin fibers. In particular, phosphorylation of histones H1 and H3 at mitosis does not affect chromatin fiber structure, since the same x-ray results are obtained whether or not histone dephosphorylation is prevented by isolating metaphase chromosomes in the presence of 5,5'-dithiobis(2- nitrobenzoate) or low concentrations of p-chloromercuriphenylsulfonate (ClHgPhSO3). We also compared metaphase chromosomes isolated by several different published procedures, and found that the isolation procedure can significantly affect the x-ray diffraction pattern. High concentrations of ClHgPhSO3 can also profoundly affect the pattern.     

The Middle Region of an HP1-binding Protein, HP1-BP74, Associates with Linker DNA at the Entry/Exit Site of Nucleosomal DNA

In higher eukaryotic cells, DNA molecules are present as chromatin fibers, complexes of DNA with various types of proteins; chromatin fibers are highly condensed in metaphase chromosomes during mitosis. Although the formation of the metaphase chromosome structure is essential for the equal segregation of replicated chromosomal DNA into the daughter cells, the mechanism involved in the organization of metaphase chromosomes is poorly understood. To identify proteins involved in the formation and/or maintenance of metaphase chromosomes, we examined proteins that dissociated from isolated human metaphase chromosomes by 0.4 m NaCl treatment; this treatment led to significant chromosome decondensation, but the structure retained the core histones. One of the proteins identified, HP1-BP74 (heterochromatin protein 1-binding protein 74), composed of 553 amino acid residues, was further characterized. HP1-BP74 middle region (BP74Md), composed of 178 amino acid residues (Lys⁹⁷–Lys²⁷⁴), formed a chromatosome-like structure with reconstituted mononucleosomes and protected the linker DNA from micrococcal nuclease digestion by ∼25 bp. The solution structure determined by NMR revealed that the globular domain (Met¹⁵³–Thr²³⁷) located within BP74Md possesses a structure similar to that of the globular domain of linker histones, which underlies its nucleosome binding properties. Moreover, we confirmed that BP74Md and full-length HP1-BP74 directly binds to HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1) and identified the exact sites responsible for this interaction. Thus, we discovered that HP1-BP74 directly binds to HP1, and its middle region associates with linker DNA at the entry/exit site of nucleosomal DNA in vitro.     

Proteome analysis of human metaphase chromosomes

DNA is packaged as chromatin in the interphase nucleus. During mitosis, chromatin fibers are highly condensed to form metaphase chromosomes, which ensure equal segregation of replicated chromosomal DNA into the daughter cells. Despite >1 century of research on metaphase chromosomes, information regarding the higher order structure of metaphase chromosomes is limited, and it is still not clear which proteins are involved in further folding of the chromatin fiber into metaphase chromosomes. To obtain a global view of the chromosomal proteins, we performed proteome analyses on three types of isolated human metaphase chromosomes. We first show the results from comparative proteome analyses of two types of isolated human metaphase chromosomes that have been frequently used in biochemical and morphological analyses. 209 proteins were quantitatively identified and classified into six groups on the basis of their known interphase localization. Furthermore, a list of 107 proteins was obtained from the proteome analyses of highly purified metaphase chromosomes, the majority of which are essential for chromosome structure and function. Based on the information obtained on these proteins and on their localizations during mitosis as assessed by immunostaining, we present a four-layer model of metaphase chromosomes. According to this model, the chromosomal proteins have been newly classified into each of four groups: chromosome coating proteins, chromosome peripheral proteins, chromosome structural proteins, and chromosome fibrous proteins. This analysis represents the first compositional view of human metaphase chromosomes and provides a protein framework for future research on this topic.     

CENP-C recruits M18BP1 to centromeres to promote CENP-A chromatin assembly

Eukaryotic chromosomes segregate by attaching to microtubules of the mitotic spindle through a chromosomal microtubule binding site called the kinetochore. Kinetochores assemble on a specialized chromosomal locus termed the centromere, which is characterized by the replacement of histone H3 in centromeric nucleosomes with the essential histone H3 variant CENP-A (centromere protein A). Understanding how CENP-A chromatin is assembled and maintained is central to understanding chromosome segregation mechanisms. CENP-A nucleosome assembly requires the Mis18 complex and the CENP-A chaperone HJURP. These factors localize to centromeres in telophase/G1, when new CENP-A chromatin is assembled. The mechanisms that control their targeting are unknown. In this paper, we identify a mechanism for recruiting the Mis18 complex protein M18BP1 to centromeres. We show that depletion of CENP-C prevents M18BP1 targeting to metaphase centromeres and inhibits CENP-A chromatin assembly. We find that M18BP1 directly binds CENP-C through conserved domains in the CENP-C protein. Thus, CENP-C provides a link between existing CENP-A chromatin and the proteins required for new CENP-A nucleosome assembly.     

Prothymosin alpha, a mammalian c-myc-regulated acidic nuclear protein, provokes the decondensation of human chromosomes in vitro

Prothymosin (ProT alpha) is an acidic nuclear protein, widely distributed in mammalian cells, whose expression is regulated by c-myc and linked to cell proliferation. ProT alpha interacts with histone H1 via its acidic domain, and its overexpression provokes the unfolding of chromatin fibers. Here we show that incubation of human native metaphase chromosomes with ProT alpha induces their extensive unravelling suggesting a function of this protein in chromosome decondensation.     

Chromatin organization and basic nuclear proteins in the male germ cells of Rana tigerina

The process of chromatin condensation during spermiogenesis in Rana tigerina is similar to the heterochromatization in somatic cells, where 30 nm fibers are coalesced together into a dense mass in spermatozoa without changing their initial size and nucleosomal organization. This conclusion was supported by the finding that the full set of core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, H4) are still present in sperm chromatin, but histone H1 is replaced by its variant, H1V. Rabbit anti-sera were raised against histone H3, H1, H1V, and H5 (H1 variant in chick erythrocyte). Anti-histone H1 antiserum cross-reacted with histone H1V, which implied the presence of a common epitope. Anti-histone H1V and H5 also showed cross-reaction with each other but not with histone H1, which implied the presence of a common epitope not shared by histone H1. Immunocytochemical studies, using the above antibodies as probes, showed that histones H3 is present in all steps of spermatogenic and spermiogenic cells, and somatic cells including red blood cells, Sertoli cells, and Leydig cells, while histone H1 is present in all of the cells mentioned except in spermatozoa where it is replaced by histone H1V. Histone H1V appears in the early spermatids starting from spermatid 1 (St1), and it persists throughout the course of spermatid differentiation into spermatozoa. Histone H1V is also found in chromosomes of metaphase spermatocyte and red blood cells. Thus histone H1V may cause the final and complete condensation of chromatin in Rana spermatozoa, a process which is similar to the heterochromatization occurring in somatic cells such as metaphase chromosome and chick erythrocyte nucleus.     

Immunofluorescent studies of human chromosomes with antibodies against phosphorylated H1 histone

One of the prominent cell cycle-related modifications of histone proteins whose function remains unresolved is the phosphorylation of linker histone H1. In this work we have used indirect immunofluorescence on human cells with antibodies that are specific for phosphorylated histone H1 to examine the cellular distribution and chromosome association patterns of this protein. With confocal microscopy on whole cells, strong immunofluorescence was seen in association with mitotic chromosomes as well as a prominent punctate pattern of labeling throughout the mitotic cell, whereas interphase cells showed very little, if any, specific fluorescence. Multiple patterns of fluorescence distribution were detected with metaphase chromosomes, ranging from apparent tight colocalization with the DNA to expanded ”puffy” mitotic figures to an amorphous network of staining. It was also shown that the ability to label chromosomes could vary drastically with different fixation procedures, adding further complications to interpretation of the potentially complex role of phosphorylated histone H1 in chromatin condensation or decondensation. Received: 8 September 1999; in revised form: 14 September 1999 / Accepted: 17 September 1999     

Immunofluorescent staining of human metaphase chromosomes with monoclonal antibody to histone H2B

A mouse monoclonal IgM antibody against the core histone H2B has been shown, by indirect immunofluorescence, to stain metaphase chromosomes from a variety of cultured cell types. Experiments carried out with human HeLa cells showed that the intensity of staining varied along the length of chromosome arms giving in some cases a rudimentary banded staining pattern. Considerable variation in staining intensity was noted between individual chromosomes and between different metaphase spreads. It was noted that chromosomes having a more swollen appearance stained more intensely than those with a more compact structure, which were often unstained. Preincubation of unfixed metaphase chromosomes in buffered salt solutions virtually eliminated the cell to cell and chromosome to chromosome variation in staining, even when no visible effect on chromosome morphology was caused by such treatment. It is concluded that the determinant recognised by antibody HBC-7 is ubiquitous but is inaccessible in some chromosomes or chromosome regions. Digestion of purified chromatin (primarily interphase) with DNAase 1 or micrococcal nuclease resulted in a several-fold increase in the binding of antibody HBC-7 measured by solid-phase radioimmunoassay. This increase was abolished by subsequent treatment with trypsin, which suggests that the antigenic determinant recognised by antibody HBC-7 lies in the trypsin-sensitive N-terminal region of nucleosomal H2B. As the cationic N-terminal regions of the core histones are involved in DNA binding, it is likely that the accessibility of the determinant recognised by antibody HBC-7 is influenced by the relationship between the core histones and their associated DNA.     

Mesoscale Modeling of Nucleosome-Binding Antibody PL2-6: Mono- versus Bivalent Chromatin Complexes

Interactions of chromatin with bivalent immunoglobin nucleosome-binding antibodies and their monovalent (papain-derived) antigen-binding fragment analogs are useful probes for examining chromatin conformational states. To help interpret antibody-chromatin interactions and explore how antibodies might compete for interactions with chromatin components, we incorporate coarse-grained PL2-6 antibody modeling into our mesoscale chromatin model. We analyze interactions and fiber structures for the antibody-chromatin complexes in open and condensed chromatin, with and without H1 linker histone (LH). Despite minimal and transient interactions at physiological salt, we capture significant differences in antibody-chromatin complex configurations in open fibers, with more intense interactions between the bivalent antibody and chromatin compared to monovalent antigen-binding fragments. For these open chromatin fiber morphologies, antibody binding to histone tails is increased and compaction is greater for bivalent compared to monovalent and antibody-free systems. Differences between monovalent and bivalent binding result from antibody competition with internal chromatin fiber components (nucleosome core and linker DNA) for histone tail (H3, H4, H2A, H2B) interactions. This antibody competition for tail contacts reduces tail-core and tail-linker interactions and increases tail-antibody interactions. Such internal structural changes in open fibers resemble mechanisms of LH condensation, driven by charge screening and entropy changes. For condensed fibers at physiological salt, the three systems are much more similar overall, but some subtle tail interaction differences can be noted. Adding LH results in less-dramatic changes for all systems, except that the bivalent complex at physiological salt shows cooperative effects between LH and the antibodies in condensing chromatin fibers. Such dynamic interactions that depend on the internal structure and complex-stabilizing interactions within the chromatin fiber have implications for gene regulation and other chromatin complexes such as with LH, remodeling proteins, and small molecular chaperones that bind and modulate chromatin structure.     

The archaeal histone-fold protein HMf organizes DNA into bona fide chromatin fibers.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of histone-like proteins in Archaea urged studies into the possible organization of archaeal genomes in chromatin. Despite recent advances, a variety of structural questions remain unanswered. RESULTS: We have used the atomic force microscope (AFM) with traditional nuclease digestion assays to compare the structure of nucleoprotein complexes reconstituted from tandemly repeated eukaryal nucleosome-positioning sequences and histone octamers, H3/H4 tetramers, and the histone-fold archaeal protein HMf. The data unequivocally show that HMf reconstitutes are indeed organized as chromatin fibers, morphologically indistinguishable from their eukaryal counterparts. The nuclease digestion patterns revealed a clear pattern of protection at regular intervals, again similar to the patterns observed with eukaryal chromatin fibers. In addition, we studied HMf reconstitutes on mononucleosome-sized DNA fragments and observed a great degree of similarity in the internal organization of these particles and those organized by H3/H4 tetramers. A difference in stability was observed at the level of mono-, di-, and triparticles between the HMf particles and canonical octamer-containing nucleosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro reconstituted HMf-nucleoprotein complexes can be considered as bona fide chromatin structures. The differences in stability at the monoparticle level should be due to structural differences between HMf and core histone H3/H4 tetramers, i.e., to the complete absence in HMf of histone tails beyond the histone fold. We speculate that the existence of core histone tails in eukaryotes may provide a greater stability to nucleosomal particles and also provide the additional ability of chromatin structure to regulate DNA function in eukaryotic cells by posttranslational histone tail modifications.     

DNA-protein interactions and chromosome banding

Pancreatic DNase I was used as a probe to study DNA-protein interactions in condensed and extended chromatin fractions isolated from Chinese hamster liver, and in human lymphocyte and mouse L cell metaphase chromosomes in situ. By studying the rate of digestion of chromatin DNA by DNase, we have previously shown that DNA in extended chromatin is more sensitive to DNase digestion than that in condensed chromatin. In the current investigation, we have examined whether this differential sensitivity of the chromatin fractions to DNase is due to differences in protein binding to DNA or differences in the degree of chromatin condensation. By “decondensing” the condensed chromatin and comparing its rate of digestion to that of untreated condensed and extended chromatin, it was found that differences in the degree of binding of proteins to DNA rather than the degree of condensation of the chromatin primarily determines the sensitivity of each fraction to DNase. Extraction of the various classes of chromosomal proteins, followed by DNase digestion of the residual chromatin revealed that both the histone and non-histone proteins protect the DNA in the chromatin fractions from DNase attack; however, the more tightly associated non-histones appear to be specifically responsible for the differential sensitivity of the chromatin fractions to DNase digestion. These non-histones may be more tightly associated with the DNA in condensed than in extended chromatin, thereby protecting the DNA in condensed chromatin against DNase attack to a greater extent than that in extended chromatin. When metaphase chromosomes were briefly digested with DNase in situ and subsequently stained with Feulgen reagent, incontrovertible C-banding and some G-banding was obtained. This DNaseinduced banding demonstrates that the DNA in C-band and possibly G-band regions is less accessible to DNase than that in the interband regions, and our biochemical data suggest that this differential accessibility is caused by differential DNA-protein binding such that the non-histones are more tightly coupled to the DNA in the G- and C-band regions than they are in the interbands. Differences in the binding of non-histones to DNA in different segments of the metaphase chromosome may be involved in the mechanism of G- and C-banding.     

Yeast high mobility group protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin and is evicted during repair of DNA double strand breaks

DNA is packaged into condensed chromatin fibers by association with histones and architectural proteins such as high mobility group (HMGB) proteins. However, this DNA packaging reduces accessibility of enzymes that act on DNA, such as proteins that process DNA after double strand breaks (DSBs). Chromatin remodeling overcomes this barrier. We show here that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMGB protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin as evidenced by faster chromatin remodeling in its absence. HMO1 was evicted along with core histones during repair of DSBs, and chromatin remodeling events such as histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 eviction were faster in absence of HMO1. The facilitated chromatin remodeling in turn correlated with more efficient DNA resection and recruitment of repair proteins; for example, inward translocation of the DNA-end-binding protein Ku was faster in absence of HMO1. This chromatin stabilization requires the lysine-rich C-terminal extension of HMO1 as truncation of the HMO1 C-terminal tail phenocopies hmo1 deletion. Since this is reminiscent of the need for the basic C-terminal domain of mammalian histone H1 in chromatin compaction, we speculate that HMO1 promotes chromatin stability by DNA bending and compaction imposed by its lysine-rich domain and that it must be evicted along with core histones for efficient DSB repair.