SUMO化修饰与DNA损伤修复

蛋白质的翻译后修饰在很大程度上决定了蛋白质的活性、细胞定位、稳定性及蛋白质之间的相互作用.而在DNA损伤修复过程中,通过调控不同修复蛋白的翻译后修饰来影响他们的活性及细胞定位,进而导致DNA损伤修复途径的不同和修复结果的差异.新近研究表明,蛋白质的SUMO化修饰在DNA损伤修复和基因组稳定性的维护方面发挥重要作用.本文将对SUMO化修饰对DNA损伤修复的调控的最新研究进展做一综述.     

SUMO化修饰在DNA损伤响应中的作用

物理或化学等多种因素均可以引起DNA损伤。为维持机体基因组的稳定性,机体形成了精确完整的机制来修复损伤的／DNA。SUMO（smallubiquitin-relatedmodifier,SUMO）化修饰与其他蛋白翻译后修饰一样,具有多种生物学功能。近年来的研究表明,其在DNA损伤修复中也具有非常重要的作用。该文就DNA损伤修复、SUMO,96修饰系统及其二者关系的最新研究进展作了较为全面的介绍和总结。     

蛋白质SUMO化修饰与肿瘤调控

SUMO化修饰是一种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰方式,在细胞周期调控、细胞代谢、基因转录、DNA损伤和修复等众多细胞生物学过程中,对底物蛋白质的表达、定位和活性进行调控。蛋白质SUMO化修饰是动态可逆的过程,去SUMO化修饰由SUMO特异性蛋白酶(SENPs)家族成员所催化。由于受到SUMO化修饰的底物蛋白种类众多、功能多样,SUMO化修饰能够在整体和特定蛋白质修饰层面,参与调控肿瘤的发生发展,并且这种调控机制非常复杂,比如调控细胞周期的进程、DNA损伤和基因组不稳定性、肿瘤代谢与生长、抗肿瘤免疫等。SENPs家族成员是底物蛋白质SUMO化修饰程度的决定者,该研究团队对SENPs家族成员在肿瘤中的作用开展了系列研究,因此该文也将以SENP1和SENP3为例,对SENPs在肿瘤进程中的作用及其作用机制展开介绍。     

蛋白质SUMO化修饰研究进展

SUMO(small ubiquitin-related modifier)是类泛素蛋白家族的重要成员之一,可与多种蛋白结合发挥相应的功能,其分子结构及SUMO化反应途径都与泛素类似,但二者功能完全不同。SUMO化修饰可参与转录调节、核转运、维持基因组完整性及信号转导等多种细胞内活动,是一种重要的多功能的蛋白质翻译后修饰方式。SUMO化修饰功能的失调可能导致某些疾病的发生。     

植物蛋白SUMO化修饰检测方法

SUMO化是一种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰,对植物正常生长发育不可或缺。到目前为止已筛选到上千个可能的SUMO底物,但由于SUMO化修饰水平普遍很低,其生物学功能研究相对较少。该文详细描述了检测蛋白SUMO化修饰的常用方法,包括体外和体内SUMO化实验,以及SUMO化修饰位点的检测方法,旨在为深入研究植物蛋白SUMO化修饰提供技术支持。     

SUMO化和磷酸化的相互作用与共同修饰

翻译后修饰如磷酸化、乙酰化、甲基化、泛素化和SUMO化调节不同蛋白质的不同功能。磷酸化可能是最常见的修饰之一,蛋白质磷酸化通过一系列的激酶和磷酸酶催化,从而改变蛋白质功能。SUMO修饰是一种类泛素化修饰。SUMO修饰包括活化、结合、连接和解离,涉及多个酶多个步骤的催化过程。SUMO化可调节蛋白质相互作用、亚细胞定位、蛋白质稳定性和转录活性。关于磷酸化和SUMO化的蛋白质翻译后修饰,已有广泛研究报道。但很少关注于磷酸化和SUMO化之间的相互作用,以及它们对蛋白质的共同修饰。本文综述了蛋白质磷酸化和SUMO化之间的相互作用,以及共同修饰对细胞生理和肿瘤的影响。     

蛋白质多聚SUMO化修饰及其功能

泛素（ubiquitin, Ub）是一类高度保守的小蛋白, 可与靶蛋白的赖氨酸残基共价连接, 形成多聚泛素链行使功能. 类似于泛素化修饰过程, 小泛素相关修饰物(small ubiquitin related modifier, SUMO）也可以共价修饰靶蛋白的赖氨酸残基, 从而影响靶蛋白的定位、稳定性以及蛋白间的相互作用, 发挥重要的生理功能. 尽管在多数情况下, 靶蛋白发生的是单SUMO化修饰, 但最近研究发现,SUMO依赖自身的赖氨酸也可以形成多聚链. 与单SUMO化修饰不同的是, 多聚SUMO化修饰的靶蛋白可以进一步被泛素化修饰, 进而诱导靶蛋白的降解. 这是一种新的、特殊的化学修饰形式, 弄清它的生理功能,对于了解细胞的生长、分化以及凋亡等生理过程将具有重要的意义. 本文将就此方面的最新研究进展做一综述.     

植物SUMO化修饰研究进展

SUMO化修饰是一种高度保守的蛋白质翻译后修饰。在SUMO化酶系统的协同作用下,成熟的SUMO分子以异肽键的方式结合到靶蛋白上,调控靶蛋白稳定性、活性、定位等。同时,发生SUMO化修饰的蛋白在SUMO特异蛋白酶的作用下发生去SUMO化反应,使SUMO重新进入循环过程。已知SUMO化修饰参与了植物胁迫响应、生长发育、开花等重要生理过程的调控。本文主要介绍了植物SUMO化修饰途径及其调控的生物学过程,并讨论蛋白组学方法在SUMO化修饰底物鉴定的进展及问题。     

SUMO化修饰对NF-kB信号通路的调控

小泛素相关修饰物(small ubiquitin-related modifier,SUMO)经由一系列酶介导的生化级联反应共价结合于靶蛋白的赖氨酸残基上,稳定靶蛋白免受降解的过程称为SUMO化修饰(SUMOylation).核转录因子kB(nuclear factors kB,NF-kB)是公认的炎症和免疫反应的重要调节因子,并与糖尿病的发生发展密切相关.近年来研究发现,不仅NF-kB抑制蛋白(inhibitor of NF-kB,IkB)的SUMO化修饰参与NF-kB信号通路的调节,而且SUMO酶可以直接调节NF-kB对靶基因的转录.现就SUMO亚型及结构,SUMO化修饰与去SUMO化修饰过程,SUMO、SUMO酶对NF-kB的转录调控及其与糖尿病相关性的最新研究进展作以综述.     

SUMO化和磷酸化的相互作用和共同修饰

翻译后修饰如磷酸化、乙酰化、甲基化、泛素化和SUMO化调节不同蛋白质的不同功能。磷酸化可能是最常见的修饰之一,蛋白质磷酸化通过一系列的激酶和磷酸酶催化,从而改变蛋白质功能。SUMO修饰是一种类泛素化修饰。SUMO修饰包括活化、结合、连接和解离,涉及多个酶多个步骤的催化过程。SUMO化可调节蛋白质相互作用、亚细胞定位、蛋白质稳定性和转录活性。关于磷酸化和SUMO化的蛋白质翻译后修饰,已有广泛研究报道。但很少关注于磷酸化和SUMO化之间的相互作用,以及它们对蛋白质的共同修饰。本文综述了蛋白质磷酸化和SUMO化之间的相互作用,以及共同修饰对细胞生理和肿瘤的影响。     

Checkpoint mechanisms at the intersection between DNA damage and repair

In response to genomic insults cells trigger a signal transduction pathway, known as DNA damage checkpoint, whose role is to help the cell to cope with the damage by coordinating cell cycle progression, DNA replication and DNA repair mechanisms. Accumulating evidence suggests that activation of the first checkpoint kinase in the cascade is not due to the lesion itself, but it requires recognition and initial processing of the lesion by a specific repair mechanism. Repair enzymes likely convert a variety of physically and chemically different lesions to a unique common structure, a ssDNA region, which is the checkpoint triggering signal. Checkpoint kinases can modify the activity of repair mechanisms, allowing for efficient repair, on one side, and modulating the generation of the ssDNA signal, on the other. This strategy may be important to allow the most effective repair and a prompt recovery from the damage condition. Interestingly, at least in some cases, if the damage level is low enough the cell can deal with the lesions and it does not need to activate the checkpoint response. On the other hand if damage level is high or if the lesions are not rapidly repairable, checkpoint mechanisms become important for cell survival and preservation of genome integrity.     

白念珠菌DNA损伤与修复

内外环境中各种因素如电离辐射、紫外辐射、氧化剂、烷化剂等都可以造成白念珠菌DNA的损伤。如果DNA的损伤得不到有效的修复,便会造成突变。白念珠菌的突变率很高,但并不是所有DNA受损伤的细胞都会表现出突变型性状,这跟其自身的修复系统有很大关系,主要包括切除修复、错配修复及双链断裂修复等途径,使得绝大多数损伤能够及时修复,从而维持DNA的完整性与稳定性。白念珠菌DNA的损伤修复可能影响其适应性、药物敏感性等表型,从而给临床感染患者的治疗增加难度。本文主要从白念珠菌DNA损伤的产生,损伤信号的传导识别及损伤修复三方面综述目前的研究进展。     

Acclimation and repair of DNA damage in recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli

AIMS: The aim of this study is to understand different adaptive responses in bacteria caused by three different mutagens, namely, an intercalating agent, an alkylating agent and a hydroxylating agent, and the repair systems according to the type of DNA damage, that is, DNA cross-linking and delayed DNA synthesis, alkylation and hydroxylation of DNA. A recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli, DPD2794 with the recA promoter fused to luxCDABE originating from Vibrio fischeri, was used in this study. METHODS AND RESULTS: The recombinant bioluminescent E. coli strain DPD2794, containing a recA promoter fused to luxCDABE from V. fischeri, was used to detect adaptive and repair responses to DNA damage caused by mitomycin C (MMC), and these responses were compared with those when the cells were induced with N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The response ratio between the induced samples and that of the controls decreased suddenly when the induced culture was used in further inductions, indicating a possible adaptive response to DNA damage. DNA damage, or the proteins produced, because of MMC addition does not appear to be completely resolved until the seventh sub-culture after the initial induction, whereas simple damage, such as the base modification caused by MNNG and H2O2, appears to be repaired rapidly as evidenced by the quick recovery of sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that it takes more time to completely repair DNA damage caused by MMC, as compared with a simple repair such as that required for the damage caused by MNNG and H2O2. Therefore, repair of the damage caused by these three mutagens is controlled by different regulons, even though they all induced the recA promoter. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Using a bioluminescent E. coli harbouring a recA promoter-lux fusion, it was found that different adaptive responses and repair systems for DNA damage caused by several mutagens exists in E. coli.     

The comet assay for DNA damage and repair

The comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis) is a simple method for measuring deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) strand breaks in eukaryotic cells. Cells embedded in agarose on a microscope slide are lysed with detergent and high salt to form nucleoids containing supercoiled loops of DNA linked to the nuclear matrix. Electrophoresis at high pH results in structures resembling comets, observed by fluorescence microscopy; the intensity of the comet tail relative to the head reflects the number of DNA breaks. The likely basis for this is that loops containing a break lose their supercoiling and become free to extend toward the anode. The assay has applications in testing novel chemicals for genotoxicity, monitoring environmental contamination with genotoxins, human biomonitoring and molecular epidemiology, and fundamental research in DNA damage and repair. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay are greatly enhanced if the nucleoids are incubated with bacterial repair endonucleases that recognize specific kinds of damage in the DNA and convert lesions to DNA breaks, increasing the amount of DNA in the comet tail. DNA repair can be monitored by incubating cells after treatment with damaging agent and measuring the damage remaining at intervals. Alternatively, the repair activity in a cell extract can be measured by incubating it with nucleoids containing specific damage.     

Cohesin and DNA damage repair

Replicated DNA molecules are physically connected by cohesin complexes from the time of their synthesis in S-phase until they are segregated during anaphase of the subsequent mitosis or meiosis. This sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic or meiotic spindle. In addition, cohesion is also essential during G2-phase of the cell cycle to allow repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Although cohesion can normally only be established during S-phase, recent work in yeast has shown that DNA double-strand breaks induce the recruitment of cohesin to the damage site and lead to the de novo formation of cohesion at this site. It is unknown if similar mechanisms operate in higher eukaryotes, but in mammalian cells phosphorylation of the cohesin subunit Smc1 by the protein kinase Atm has been shown to be important for DNA repair. We discuss how cohesin and sister chromatid cohesion might facilitate the repair of damaged DNA.     

乳腺癌易感蛋白1在DNA损伤修复中的作用

人类乳腺癌易感基因1(breast cancer susceptibility gene 1,BRCA1)首先是在乳腺癌家族中发现的,是具有遗传倾向的乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感基因,其基因的突变与家族性乳腺癌及卵巢癌的发生有密切联系。BRCA1是一种抑癌基因,其基因产物可以参与维持基因组稳定性的多条细胞信号通路,例如DNA损伤诱导的细胞周期调控、DNA损伤修复、基因转录调节、细胞凋亡、泛素化等重要的细胞活动。本文就近几年来BRCA1在DNA损伤修复中的作用的研究进展作一综述,包括DNA损伤诱导的细胞周期检查点的激活和DNA损伤修复两方面。     

Triplex technology in studies of DNA damage, DNA repair, and mutagenesis

Triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) can bind to the major groove of homopurine-homopyrimidine stretches of double-stranded DNA in a sequence-specific manner through Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding to form DNA triplexes. TFOs by themselves or conjugated to reactive molecules can be used to direct sequence-specific DNA damage, which in turn results in the induction of several DNA metabolic activities. Triplex technology is highly utilized as a tool to study gene regulation, molecular mechanisms of DNA repair, recombination, and mutagenesis. In addition, TFO targeting of specific genes has been exploited in the development of therapeutic strategies to modulate DNA structure and function. In this review, we discuss advances made in studies of DNA damage, DNA repair, recombination, and mutagenesis by using triplex technology to target specific DNA sequences.     

Assessment of DNA damage and repair in Mycobacterium terrae after exposure to UV irradiation

AIM: Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation for drinking water treatment was examined for inactivation and subsequent dark and photo-repair of Mycobacterium terrae. METHODS AND RESULTS: UV sources tested were low pressure (monochromatic, 254 nm) and medium pressure (polychromatic UV output) Hg lamps. UV exposure resulted in inactivation, and was followed by dark or photo-repair experiments. Inactivation and repair were quantified utilizing a molecular-based endonuclease sensitive site (ESS) assay and conventional colony forming unit (CFU) viability assay. Mycobacterium terrae was more resistant to UV disinfection compared to many other bacteria, with approximately 2-log reduction at a UV fluence of 10 mJ cm(-2) ; similar to UV inactivation of M. tuberculosis. There was no difference in inactivation between monochromatic or polychromatic UV lamps. Mycobacterium terrae did not undergo detectable dark repair. Photo-repair resulted in recovery from inactivation by approximately 0.5-log in less than 30 min for both UV lamp systems. CONCLUSIONS: Mycobacterium terrae is able to photo-repair DNA damage within a short timeframe. The number of pyrimidine dimers induced by UV light were similar for Escherichia coli and M. terrae, however, this similarity did not hold true for viability results. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: There is no practical difference between UV sources for disinfection or prevention of DNA repair for M. terrae. The capability of M. terrae to photo-repair UV damage fairly quickly is important for wastewater treatment applications where disinfected effluent is exposed to sunlight. Finally, molecular based assay results should be evaluated with respect to differences in the nucleic acid content of the test micro-organism.     

Measuring oxidative damage to DNA and its repair with the comet assay

Background

Single cell gel electrophoresis, or the comet assay, was devised as a sensitive method for detecting DNA strand breaks, at the level of individual cells. A simple modification, incorporating a digestion of DNA with a lesion-specific endonuclease, makes it possible to measure oxidised bases.

Scope of review

With the inclusion of formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase to recognise oxidised purines, or Nth (endonuclease III) to detect oxidised pyrimidines, the comet assay has been used extensively in human biomonitoring to monitor oxidative stress, usually in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Major conclusions

There is evidence to suggest that the enzymic approach is more accurate than chromatographic methods, when applied to low background levels of base oxidation. However, there are potential problems of over-estimation (because the enzymes are not completely specific) or under-estimation (failure to detect lesions that are close together). Attempts have been made to improve the inter-laboratory reproducibility of the comet assay.

General significance

In addition to measuring DNA damage, the assay can be used to monitor the cellular or in vitro repair of strand breaks or oxidised bases. It also has applications in assessing the antioxidant status of cells. In its various forms, the comet assay is now an invaluable tool in human biomonitoring and genotoxicity testing. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Current methods to study reactive oxygen species - pros and cons and biophysics of membrane proteins. Guest Editor: Christine Winterbourn.