Preadult competition between Drosophila subobscura and Drosophila pseudoobscura

The Palaearctic species Drosophila subobscura has recently colonized a large area of North America where it coexists with Drosophila pseudoobscura. The viability and developmental rate of these species were studied at 13 d?C, 18d?C and 23 d?C and at densities of 10, 50, 100 and 200 eggs per vial. The two species were differently affected by density and temperature in the ranges studied. Both intra- and interspecific cultures showed that D. pseudoobscura was best adapted to 23 d?C, where it was clearly the dominant species. On the other hand, at 18 d?C and especially at 13 d?C, although D. subobscura was less viable than D. pseudoobscura, its developmental time was shorter, which may give advantage to this species. Results reported here agree with the observed distribution of these species in North America.     

Drosophila haematopoiesis

Like in vertebrates, Drosophila haematopoiesis occurs in two waves. It gives rise to three types of haemocytes: plasmatocytes (phagocytosis), crystal cells (melanization) and lamellocytes (encapsulation of parasites). A first population of haemocytes, specified during embryogenesis, gives rise to an invariant number of plasmatocytes and crystal cells. A second population of haemocytes is specified during larval development in a specialized haematopoietic organ, the lymph gland. All three types of haemocytes can be specified in this organ, but lamellocytes only differentiate in response to parasitism. Thus, larval in contrast to embryonic haematopoiesis can be modulated by physiological constraints. Molecular cascades controlling embryonic haematopoiesis are relatively well established and require transactivators such as GATA, FOG and Runx factors, which are also co-opted in mammalian haematopoiesis. Mechanisms involved during larval haematopoiesis are less well understood although a number of chromatin remodelling factors and signalling pathways (JAK/STAT, Toll, Hedgehog, Notch) are required. In healthy larvae a pool of progenitors is maintained within the lymph gland, under the control of a signalling centre which expresses Collier, Serrate, Antennapedia and Hedgehog, and controls haemocyte homeostasis. Its key role in haemocyte homeostasis is reminiscent of interactions described in vertebrates between haematopoietic stem cells and their microenvironment (niche).     

Divergence of the Regulation of alpha-Amylase Activity in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila funebris, and Drosophila saltans

The regulation of amylase activity in threeDrosophila species, D. melanogaster,D. funebris and D. saltans, wasanalyzed by measuring the specific activity levels infour dietary environments, cornmeal, glucose, 5% starch, and 10% starch, at threedevelopmental stages, i.e., the third-instar larval,pupal, and 2-day-old adult stages. The developmentalprofiles of amylase activity for the threeDrosophila species showed that the level of activity washigh at the larval and adult stages but substantiallylow at the pupal stage, suggesting thatDrosophila does not utilize starch at the pupalstage. Divergence in the regulation of amylase was observed amongthe three Drosophila species on the followingpoints. (1) The order of amylase specific activity wasD. melanogaster > D. funebris >D. saltans. (2) The response pattern to the dietary environment varied amongthe species and changed during development. (3) Thetiming of the switch in the response pattern to thedietary environment during development was before pupation in D. funebris and D.saltans but after pupation in D.melanogaster. The significance of the divergence inthe regulation of amylase activity for adaptation to astarch environment in Drosophila is discussed.     

Phylogenetic relationship between Drosophila takahashii Sturtevant and Drosophila pseudotakahashii Mather

The phylogenetic relationship between two Drosophila species of the takahashii subgroup, D. takahashii and D. pseudotakahashii, was determined through the study of male genitalia, metaphase and salivary chromosomes, mating behaviour and interspecific hybridization. From all lines of evidence it is concluded that the species are very closely related, and now constitute a pair of allopatric sibling species.     

Clonal analysis in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

We have analysed the viability of cellular clones induced by mitotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster/D. simulans hybrid females during larval growth. These clones contain a portion of either melanogaster or simulans genomes in homozygosity. Analysis has been carried out for the X and the second chromosomes, as well as for the 3L chromosome arm. Clones were not found in certain structures, and in others they appeared in a very low frequency. Only in abdominal tergites was a significant number of clones observed, although their frequency was lower than in melanogaster abdomens. The bigger the portion of the genome that is homozygous, the less viable is the recombinant melano-gaster/simulans hybrid clone. The few clones that appeared may represent cases in which mitotic recombination took place in distal chromosome intervals, so that the clones contained a small portion of either melanogaster or simulans chromosomes in homozygosity. Moreover, Lhr, a gene of D. simulans that suppresses the lethality of male and female melanogaster/simulans hybrids, does not suppress the lethality of the recombinant melanogaster/simulans clones. Thus, it appears that there is not just a single gene, but at least one per tested chromosome arm (and maybe more) that cause hybrid lethality. Therefore, the two species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans, have diverged to such a degree that the absence of part of the genome of one species cannot be substituted by the corresponding part of the genome of the other, probably due to the formation of co-adapted gene complexes in both species following their divergent evolution after speciation. The disruption of those coadapted gene complexes would cause the lethality of the recombinant hybrid clones.     

Errantiviruses of Drosophila

The view on Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, which have three reading frames, as endogenous retroviruses or errantiviruses (ERVs, according to the latest ICTV nomenclature) is discussed. Data on the biology of ERVs and the mechanisms of their involvement in genetic instability of Drosophila are considered.     

Phototransduction in Drosophila

The Drosophila visual transduction is the fastest known G protein-coupled signaling cascade and has been served as a model for understanding the molecular mechanisms of other G protein-coupled signaling cascades. Numbers of components in visual transduction machinery have been identified. Based on the functional characterization of these genes, a model for Drosophila phototransduction has been outlined, including rhodopsin activation, phosphoinoside signaling, and the opening of TRP and TRPL channels. Recently, the characterization of mutants, showing slow termination, revealed the physiological significance and the mechanism of rapid termination of light response.     

Drosophila Nonsense Suppressors: Functional Analysis in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae, Drosophila Tissue Culture Cells and Drosophila Melanogaster

Amber (UAG) and opal (UGA) nonsense suppressors were constructed by oligonucleotide site-directed mutagenesis of two Drosophila melanogaster leucine-tRNA genes and tested in yeast, Drosophila tissue culture cells and transformed flies. Suppression of a variety of amber and opal alleles occurs in yeast. In Drosophila tissue culture cells, the mutant tRNAs suppress hsp70:Adh (alcohol dehydrogenase) amber and opal alleles as well as an hsp70:β-gal (β-galactosidase) amber allele. The mutant tRNAs were also introduced into the Drosophila genome by P element-mediated transformation. No measurable suppression was seen in histochemical assays for Adh(n4) (amber), Adh(nB) (opal), or an amber allele of β-galactosidase. Low levels of suppression (approximately 0.1-0.5% of wild type) were detected using an hsp70:cat (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) amber mutation. Dominant male sterility was consistently associated with the presence of the amber suppressors.     

Purification and enzyme stability of alcohol dehydrogenase from Drosophila simulans, Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogaster adhS.

Three alcohol dehydrogenases from Drosophila simulans, Drosophila virillis and Drosophila melanogaster adhS (which possesses an alloenzyme with slow electrophoretic mobility) were purified essentially to homogeneity. The purification procedure involves a new step of affinity chromatography, which efficiently lowers the amount of contaminants in the final preparation, producing a very stable enzyme. The purification procedure developed consists of a salmine sulphate precipitation, two CM-Sepharose CL-6B colume-chromatography steps, an affinity-chromatography step and a Sephacryl gel filtration. A minimum of 30-fold purification is obtained and the yield is not less than 34%. The isoelectric points and molar absorption coefficients were determined.     

Errantiviruses of Drosophila

The view on Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, which have three reading frames, as endogenous retroviruses or errantiviruses (ERVs, according to the latest ICTV nomenclature) is discussed. Data on the biology of ERVs and the mechanisms of their involvement in genetic instability of Drosophila are considered.