Mutagenesis in the switch IV of the helical domain of the human Gsalpha reduces its GDP/GTP exchange rate

The Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins are constituted by a conserved GTPase "Ras-like" domain (RasD) and by a unique alpha-helical domain (HD). Upon GTP binding, four regions, called switch I, II, III, and IV, have been identified as undergoing structural changes. Switch I, II, and III are located in RasD and switch IV in HD. All Galpha known functions, such as GTPase activity and receptor, effector, and Gbetagamma interaction sites have been found to be localized in RasD, but little is known about the role of HD and its switch IV region. Through the construction of chimeras between human and Xenopus Gsalpha we have previously identified a HD region, encompassing helices alphaA, alphaB, and alphaC, that was responsible for the observed functional differences in their capacity to activate adenylyl cyclase (Antonelli et al. [1994]: FEBS Lett 340:249-254). Since switch IV is located within this region and contains most of the nonconservative amino acid differences between both Gsalpha proteins, in the present work we constructed two human Gsalpha mutant proteins in which we have changed four and five switch IV residues for the ones present in the Xenopus protein. Mutants M15 (hGsalphaalphaS133N, M135P, P138K, P143S) and M17 (hGsalphaalphaS133N, M135P, V137Y, P138K, P143S) were expressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and characterized by their ability to bind GTPgammaS, dissociate GDP, hydrolyze GTP, and activate adenylyl cyclase. A decreased rate of GDP release, GTPgammaS binding, and GTP hydrolysis was observed for both mutants, M17 having considerably slower kinetics than M15 for all functions tested. Reconstituted adenylyl cyclase activity with both mutants showed normal activation in the presence of AlF(4)(-), but a decreased activation with GTPgammaS, which is consistent with the lower GDP dissociating rate they displayed. These data provide new evidence on the role that HD is playing in modulating the GDP/GTP exchange of the Gsalpha subunit.     

Loss of the effector function in a transducin-alpha mutant associated with Nougaret night blindness

A missense mutation, G38D, was found in the rod transducin alpha subunit (Galpha(t)) in individuals with the Nougaret form of dominant stationary night blindness. To elucidate the mechanism of Nougaret night blindness, we have examined the key functional properties of the mutant transducin. Our data show that the G38D mutation does not alter the interaction between Galpha(t) and Gbetagamma(t) or activation of transducin by photoexcited rhodopsin (R*). The mutant Galpha(t) has only a modestly (approximately 2.5-fold) reduced k(cat) value for GTP hydrolysis. The GTPase activity of Galpha(t)G38D can be accelerated by photoreceptor regulator of G protein signaling, RGS9. Analysis of the Galpha(t)G38D interaction with cGMP phosphodiesterase revealed marked impairment of the mutant effector function. Galpha(t)G38D completely fails to bind the inhibitory PDE gamma subunit and activate the enzyme. Altogether, our results demonstrate a novel molecular mechanism in dominant stationary night blindness. In contrast to known forms of the disease caused by constitutive activation of the visual cascade, the Nougaret form has its origin in attenuated visual signaling due to loss of effector function by transducin G38D mutant.     

Gbetagamma inhibits Galpha GTPase-activating proteins by inhibition of Galpha-GTP binding during stimulation by receptor

Gbetagamma subunits modulate several distinct molecular events involved with G protein signaling. In addition to regulating several effector proteins, Gbetagamma subunits help anchor Galpha subunits to the plasma membrane, promote interaction of Galpha with receptors, stabilize the binding of GDP to Galpha to suppress spurious activation, and provide membrane contact points for G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Gbetagamma subunits have also been shown to inhibit the activities of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), both phospholipase C (PLC)-betas and RGS proteins, when assayed in solution under single turnover conditions. We show here that Gbetagamma subunits inhibit G protein GAP activity during receptor-stimulated, steady-state GTPase turnover. GDP/GTP exchange catalyzed by receptor requires Gbetagamma in amounts approximately equimolar to Galpha, but GAP inhibition was observed with superstoichiometric Gbetagamma. The potency of inhibition varied with the GAP and the Galpha subunit, but half-maximal inhibition of the GAP activity of PLC-beta1 was observed with 5-10 nM Gbetagamma, which is at or below the concentrations of Gbetagamma needed for regulation of physiologically relevant effector proteins. The kinetics of GAP inhibition of both receptor-stimulated GTPase activity and single turnover, solution-based GAP assays suggested a competitive mechanism in which Gbetagamma competes with GAPs for binding to the activated, GTP-bound Galpha subunit. An N-terminal truncation mutant of PLC-beta1 that cannot be directly regulated by Gbetagamma remained sensitive to inhibition of its GAP activity, suggesting that the Gbetagamma binding site relevant for GAP inhibition is on the Galpha subunit rather than on the GAP. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer between cyan or yellow fluorescent protein-labeled G protein subunits and Alexa532-labeled RGS4, we found that Gbetagamma directly competes with RGS4 for high-affinity binding to Galpha(i)-GDP-AlF4.     

Perturbing the linker regions of the alpha-subunit of transducin: a new class of constitutively active GTP-binding proteins

The GDP-GTP exchange activity of the retinal G protein, transducin, is markedly accelerated by the photoreceptor rhodopsin in the first step of visual transduction. The x-ray structures for the alpha subunits of transducin (alpha(T)) and other G proteins suggest that the nucleotide-binding (Ras-like) domain and a large helical domain form a "clam shell" that buries the GDP molecule. Thus, receptor-promoted G protein activation may involve "opening the clam shell" to facilitate GDP dissociation. In this study, we have examined whether perturbing the linker regions connecting the Ras-like and helical domains of Galpha subunits gives rise to a more readily exchangeable state. The sole glycine residues in linkers 1 and 2 were individually changed to proline residues within an alpha(T)/alpha(i1) chimera (designated alpha(T)(*)). Both alpha(T)(*) linker mutants showed significant increases in their basal rates of GDP-GTP exchange when compared either to retinal alpha(T) or recombinant alpha(T)(*). The alpha(T)(*) linker mutants were responsive to aluminum fluoride, which binds to alpha-GDP complexes and induces changes in Switch 2. Although both linker mutants were further activated by light-activated rhodopsin together with the betagamma complex, their activation was not influenced by betagamma alone, arguing against the idea that the betagamma complex helps to pry apart the helical and Ras-like domains of Galpha subunits. Once activated, the alpha(T)(*) linker mutants were able to stimulate the cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase. Overall, these findings highlight a new class of activated Galpha mutants that constitutively exchange GDP for GTP and should prove valuable in studying different G protein-signaling systems.     

Dominant-negative inhibition of pheromone receptor signaling by a single point mutation in the G protein alpha subunit

In yeast, two different constitutive mutants of the G protein alpha subunit have been reported. Gpa1(Q323L) cannot hydrolyze GTP and permanently activates the pheromone response pathway. Gpa1(N388D) was also proposed to lack GTPase activity, yet it has an inhibitory effect on pheromone responsiveness. We have characterized this inhibitory mutant (designated Galpha(ND)) and found that it binds GTP, interacts with G protein betagamma subunits, and exhibits full GTPase activity in vitro. Although pheromone leads to dissociation of the receptor from wild-type G protein, the same treatment promotes stable association of the receptor with Galpha(ND). We conclude that agonist binding to the receptor promotes the formation of a nondissociable complex with Galpha(ND), and in this manner prevents activation of the endogenous wild-type G protein. Dominant-negative mutants may be useful in matching specific receptors and their cognate G proteins and in determining mechanisms of G protein signaling specificity.     

Stabilization of an intermediate activation state for transducin by a fluorescent GTP analogue

The GTP-binding protein (G protein), transducin, serves as a key molecular switch in vertebrate vision through the tight regulation of its GTP-binding (activation)/GTP hydrolytic (deactivation) cycle by the photoreceptor rhodopsin. To better understand the structure-function characteristics of transducin activation, we have set out to identify spectroscopic probes that bind to the guanine nucleotide-binding site of this G protein and maintain its ability to interact with its specific cellular target/effector, the cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase (PDE). In this study, we describe the characterization of a fluorescently labeled GTP analogue, BODIPY-FL GTPgammaS (BOD-GTPgammaS), that binds to the alpha subunit of transducin (alpha(T)) in a rhodopsin- and Gbetagamma-dependent manner, similar to the binding of GTP or GTPgammaS, with an apparent dissociation constant of 100 nM. The rhodopsin-dependent binding of BOD-GTPgammaS to alpha(T) is slow, relative to the rate of binding of GTPgammaS, particularly under conditions where rhodopsin must act catalytically to stimulate the exchange of BOD-GTPgammaS for GDP on multiple alpha(T) subunits. This reflects a slower rate of dissociation of rhodopsin and Gbetagamma from alpha(T)-BOD-GTPgammaS complexes, relative to their rates of dissociation from alpha(T)-GTPgammaS. The binding of BOD-GTPgammaS occurs without a change in the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of alpha(T), indicating that only a subtle movement of the Switch 2 domain on alpha(T) accompanies the binding of this GTPgammaS analogue. Nevertheless, the BOD-GTPgammaS-bound alpha(T) subunit is able to bind with high affinity to the recombinant, purified gamma subunit of PDE (gamma(PDE)) labeled with 5-((((2-iodoacetyl)amino)ethyl)amino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (IAEDANS (K(d) approximately 13 nM)), as well as bind to and stimulate the activity of PDE, albeit less efficiently compared to alpha(T)-GTPgammaS. Taken together, these findings suggest that the binding of BOD-GTPgammaS to transducin causes it to adopt a distinct conformation that appears to be intermediate between the inactive and fully active states of alpha(T), and this fluorescent nucleotide analogue can be used as a reporter group to characterize the interactions of alpha(T) in this conformational state with its biological target/effector.     

Structural basis of function in heterotrimeric G proteins

Heterotrimeric guanine-nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) act as molecular switches in signaling pathways by coupling the activation of heptahelical receptors at the cell surface to intracellular responses. In the resting state, the G-protein alpha subunit (Galpha) binds GDP and Gbetagamma. Receptors activate G proteins by catalyzing GTP for GDP exchange on Galpha, leading to a structural change in the Galpha(GTP) and Gbetagamma subunits that allows the activation of a variety of downstream effector proteins. The G protein returns to the resting conformation following GTP hydrolysis and subunit re-association. As the G-protein cycle progresses, the Galpha subunit traverses through a series of conformational changes. Crystallographic studies of G proteins in many of these conformations have provided substantial insight into the structures of these proteins, the GTP-induced structural changes in Galpha, how these changes may lead to subunit dissociation and allow Galpha and Gbetagamma to activate effector proteins, as well as the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. However, relatively little is known about the receptor-G protein complex and how this interaction leads to GDP release from Galpha. This article reviews the structural determinants of the function of heterotrimeric G proteins in mammalian systems at each point in the G-protein cycle with special emphasis on the mechanism of receptor-mediated G-protein activation. The receptor-G protein complex has proven to be a difficult target for crystallography, and several biophysical and computational approaches are discussed that complement the currently available structural information to improve models of this interaction. Additionally, these approaches enable the study of G-protein dynamics in solution, which is becoming an increasingly appreciated component of all aspects of G-protein signaling.     

Conformational changes in the amino-terminal helix of the G protein alpha(i1) following dissociation from Gbetagamma subunit and activation

G protein alpha subunits mediate activation of signaling pathways through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) by virtue of GTP-dependent conformational rearrangements. It is known that regions of disorder in crystal structures can be indicative of conformational flexibility within a molecule, and there are several such regions in G protein alpha subunits. The amino-terminal 29 residues of Galpha are alpha-helical only in the heterotrimer, where they contact the side of Gbeta, but little is known about the conformation of this region in the active GTP bound state. To address the role of the Galpha amino-terminus in G-protein activation and to investigate whether this region undergoes activation-dependent conformational changes, a site-directed cysteine mutagenesis study was carried out. Engineered Galpha(i1) proteins were created by first removing six native reactive cysteines to yield a mutant Galpha(i1)-C3S-C66A-C214S-C305S-C325A-C351I that no longer reacts with cysteine-directed labels. Several cysteine substitutions along the amino-terminal region were then introduced. All mutant proteins were shown to be folded properly and functional. An environmentally sensitive probe, Lucifer yellow, linked to these sites showed a fluorescence change upon interaction with Gbetagamma and with activation by AlF(4)(-). Other fluorescent probes of varying charge, size, and hydrophobicity linked to amino-terminal residues also revealed changes upon activation with bulkier probes reporting larger changes. Site-directed spin-labeling studies showed that the N-terminus of the Galpha subunit is dynamically disordered in the GDP bound state, but adopts a structure consistent with an alpha-helix upon interaction with Gbetagamma. Interaction of the resulting spin-labeled Galphabetagamma with photoactivated rhodopsin, followed by rhodopsin-catalyzed GTPgammaS binding, caused the amino-terminal domain of Galpha to revert to a dynamically disordered state similar to that of the GDP-bound form. Together these results suggest conformational changes occur in the amino-termini of Galpha(i) proteins upon subunit dissociation and upon activating conformational changes. These solution studies reveal insights into conformational changes that occur dynamically in solution.     

Structural model of a complex between the heterotrimeric G protein, Gsalpha, and tubulin

A number of studies have demonstrated interplay between the cytoskeleton and G protein signaling. Many of these studies have determined a specific interaction between tubulin, the building block of microtubules, and G proteins. The alpha subunits of some heterotrimeric G proteins, including Gsalpha, have been shown to interact strongly with tubulin. Binding of Galpha to tubulin results in increased dynamicity of microtubules due to activation of GTPase of tubulin. Tubulin also activates Gsalpha via a direct transfer of GTP between these molecules. Structural insight into the interaction between tubulin and Gsalpha was required, and was determined, in this report, through biochemical and molecular docking techniques. Solid phase peptide arrays suggested that a portion of the amino terminus, alpha2-beta4 (the region between switch II and switch III) and alpha3-beta5 (just distal to the switch III region) domains of Gsalpha are important for interaction with tubulin. Molecular docking studies revealed the best-fit models based on the biochemical data, showing an interface between the two molecules that includes the adenylyl cyclase/Gbetagamma interaction regions of Gsalpha and the exchangeable nucleotide-binding site of tubulin. These structural models explain the ability of tubulin to facilitate GTP exchange on Galpha and the ability of Galpha to activate tubulin GTPase.     

Scanning mutagenesis of regions in the Galpha protein Gpa1 that are predicted to interact with yeast mating pheromone receptors.

The mechanism by which receptors activate heterotrimeric G proteins was examined by scanning mutagenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone-responsive Galpha protein (Gpa1). The juxtaposition of high-resolution structures for rhodopsin and its cognate G protein transducin predicted that at least six regions of Galpha are in close proximity to the receptor. Mutagenesis was targeted to residues in these domains in Gpa1, which included four loop regions (beta2-beta3, alpha2-beta4, alpha3-beta5, and alpha4-beta6) as well as the N and C termini. The mutants displayed a range of phenotypes from nonsignaling to constitutive activation of the pheromone pathway. The constitutive activity of some mutants could be explained by decreased production of Gpa1, which permits unregulated signaling by Gbetagamma. However, the constitutive activity caused by the F344C and E335C mutations in the alpha2-beta4 loop and F378C in the alpha3-beta5 loop was not due to decreased protein levels, and was apparently due to defects in sequestering Gbetagamma. The strongest loss of the function mutant, which was not detectably induced by a pheromone, was caused by a K314C substitution in the beta2-beta3 loop. Several other mutations caused weak signaling phenotypes. Altogether, these results suggest that residues in different interface regions of Galpha contribute to activation of signaling.     

Mutation of the highly conserved Arg165 and Glu168 residues of human Gsalpha disrupts the alphaD-alphaE loop and enhances basal GDP/GTP exchange rate

G protein signalling regulates a wide range of cellular processes such as motility, differentiation, secretion, neurotransmission, and cell division. G proteins consist of three subunits organized as a Galpha monomer associated with a Gbetagamma heterodimer. Structural studies have shown that Galpha subunits are constituted by two domains: a Ras-like domain, also called the GTPase domain (GTPaseD), and an helical domain (HD), which is unique to heterotrimeric G-proteins. The HD display significantly higher primary structure diversity than the GTPaseD. Regardless of this diversity, there are small regions of the HD which show high degree of identity with residues that are 100% conserved. One of such regions is the alpha helixD-alpha helixE loop (alphaD-alphaE) in the HD, which contains the consensus aminoacid sequence R*-[RSA]-[RSAN]-E*-[YF]-[QH]-L in all mammalian Galpha subunits. Interestingly, the highly conserved arginine (R*) and glutamic acid (E*) residues form a salt bridge that stabilizes the alphaD-alphaE loop, that is localized in the top of the cleft formed between the GTPaseD and HD. Because the guanine nucleotide binding site is deeply buried in this cleft and those interdomain interactions are playing an important role in regulating the basal GDP/GTP nucleotide exchange rate of Galpha subunits, we studied the role of these highly conserved R and E residues in Galpha function. In the present study, we mutated the human Gsalpha R165 and E168 residues to alanine (A), thus generating the R165--> A, E168--> A, and R165/E168--> A mutants. We expressed these human Gsalpha (hGsalpha) mutants in bacteria as histidine tagged proteins, purified them by niquel-agarose chromatography and studied their nucleotide exchange properties. We show that the double R165/E168--> A mutant exhibited a fivefold increased GTP binding kinetics, a higher GDP dissociation rate, and an augmented capacity to activate adenylyl cyclase. Structure analysis showed that disruption of the salt bridge between R165 and E168 by the introduced mutations, caused important structural changes in the HD at the alphaD-alphaE loop (residues 160-175) and in the GTPaseD at a region required for Gsalpha activation by the receptor (residues 308-315). In addition, other two GTPaseD regions that surround the GTP binding site were also affected.     

Sequence of interactions in receptor-G protein coupling

Guanine nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins catalyzed by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a key event in many physiological processes. The crystal structures of the GPCR rhodopsin and two G proteins as well as binding sites on both catalytically interacting proteins are known, but the temporal sequence of events leading to nucleotide exchange remains to be elucidated. We employed time-resolved near infrared light scattering to study the order in which the Galpha and Ggamma C-terminal binding sites on the holo-G protein interact with the active state of the GPCR rhodopsin (R*) in native membranes. We investigated these key binding sites within mass-tagged peptides and G proteins and found that their binding to R* is mutually exclusive. The interaction of the holo-G protein with R* requires at least one of the lipid modifications of the G protein (i.e. myristoylation of the Galpha N terminus and/or farnesylation of the Ggamma C terminus). A holo-G protein with a high affinity Galpha C terminus shows a specific change of the reaction rate in the GDP release and GTP uptake steps of catalysis. We interpret the data by a sequential fit model where (i) the initial encounter between R* and the G protein occurs with the Gbetagamma subunit, and (ii) the Galpha C-terminal tail then interacts with R* to release bound GDP, thereby decreasing the affinity of R* for the Gbetagamma subunit. The mechanism limits the time in which both C-terminal binding sites of the G protein interact simultaneously with R* to a short lived transitory state.     

Characterization of the GRK2 binding site of Galphaq

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) transmit signals from membrane bound G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to intracellular effector proteins. The G(q) subfamily of Galpha subunits couples GPCR activation to the enzymatic activity of phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta). Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind to activated Galpha subunits, including Galpha(q), and regulate Galpha signaling by acting as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), increasing the rate of the intrinsic GTPase activity, or by acting as effector antagonists for Galpha subunits. GPCR kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate agonist-bound receptors in the first step of receptor desensitization. The amino termini of all GRKs contain an RGS homology (RH) domain, and binding of the GRK2 RH domain to Galpha(q) attenuates PLC-beta activity. The RH domain of GRK2 interacts with Galpha(q/11) through a novel Galpha binding surface termed the "C" site. Here, molecular modeling of the Galpha(q).GRK2 complex and site-directed mutagenesis of Galpha(q) were used to identify residues in Galpha(q) that interact with GRK2. The model identifies Pro(185) in Switch I of Galpha(q) as being at the crux of the interface, and mutation of this residue to lysine disrupts Galpha(q) binding to the GRK2-RH domain. Switch III also appears to play a role in GRK2 binding because the mutations Galpha(q)-V240A, Galpha(q)-D243A, both residues within Switch III, and Galpha(q)-Q152A, a residue that structurally supports Switch III, are defective in binding GRK2. Furthermore, GRK2-mediated inhibition of Galpha(q)-Q152A-R183C-stimulated inositol phosphate release is reduced in comparison to Galpha(q)-R183C. Interestingly, the model also predicts that residues in the helical domain of Galpha(q) interact with GRK2. In fact, the mutants Galpha(q)-K77A, Galpha(q)-L78D, Galpha(q)-Q81A, and Galpha(q)-R92A have reduced binding to the GRK2-RH domain. Finally, although the mutant Galpha(q)-T187K has greatly reduced binding to RGS2 and RGS4, it has little to no effect on binding to GRK2. Thus the RH domain A and C sites for Galpha(q) interaction rely on contacts with distinct regions and different Switch I residues in Galpha(q).     

X-Ray structures of the universal translation initiation factor IF2/eIF5B: conformational changes on GDP and GTP binding

X-ray structures of the universal translation initiation factor IF2/eIF5B have been determined in three states: free enzyme, inactive IF2/eIF5B.GDP, and active IF2/eIF5B.GTP. The "chalice-shaped" enzyme is a GTPase that facilitates ribosomal subunit joining and Met-tRNA(i) binding to ribosomes in all three kingdoms of life. The conserved core of IF2/eIF5B consists of an N-terminal G domain (I) plus an EF-Tu-type beta barrel (II), followed by a novel alpha/beta/alpha-sandwich (III) connected via an alpha helix to a second EF-Tu-type beta barrel (IV). Structural comparisons reveal a molecular lever, which amplifies a modest conformational change in the Switch 2 region of the G domain induced by Mg(2+)/GTP binding over a distance of 90 A from the G domain active center to domain IV. Mechanisms of GTPase function and ribosome binding are discussed.     

Site-directed mutagenesis of the magB gene affects growth and development in Magnaporthe grisea

G protein signaling is commonly involved in regulating growth and differentiation of eukaryotic cells. We previously identified MAGB, encoding a Galpha subunit, from Magnaporthe grisea, and disruption of MAGB led to defects in a number of cellular responses, including appressorium formation, conidiation, sexual development, mycelial growth, and surface sensing. In this study, site-directed mutagenesis was used to further dissect the pleiotropic effects controlled by MAGB. Conversion of glycine 42 to arginine was predicted to abolish GTPase activity, which in turn would constitutively activate G protein signaling in magB(G42R). This dominant mutation caused autolysis of aged colonies, misscheduled melanization, reduction in both sexual and asexual reproduction, and reduced virulence. Furthermore, magB(G42R) mutants were able to produce appressoria on both hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces, although development on the hydrophilic surface was delayed. A second dominant mutation, magB(G203R) (glycine 203 converted to arginine), was expected to block dissociation of the Gbetagamma from the Galpha subunit, thus producing a constitutively inactive G protein complex. This mutation did not cause drastic phenotypic changes in the wild-type genetic background, other than increased sensitivity to repression of conidiation by osmotic stress. However, magB(G203R) is able to complement phenotypic defects in magB mutants. Comparative analyses of the phenotypical effects of different magB mutations are consistent with the involvement of the Gbetagamma subunit in the signaling pathways regulating cellular development in M. grisea.     

The regulator of G protein signaling RGS4 selectively enhances alpha 2A-adreoreceptor stimulation of the GTPase activity of Go1alpha and Gi2alpha

Agonist-stimulated high affinity GTPase activity of fusion proteins between the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor and the alpha subunits of forms of the G proteins G(i1), G(i2), G(i3), and G(o1), modified to render them insensitive to the action of pertussis toxin, was measured following transient expression in COS-7 cells. Addition of a recombinant regulator of G protein signaling protein, RGS4, did not significantly affect basal GTPase activity nor agonist stimulation of the fusion proteins containing Galpha(i1) and Galpha(i3) but markedly enhanced agonist-stimulation of the proteins containing Galpha(i2) and Galpha(o1.) The effect of RGS4 on the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) fusion protein was concentration-dependent with EC(50) of 30 +/- 3 nm and the potency of the receptor agonist UK14304 was reduced 3-fold by 100 nm RGS4. Equivalent reconstitution with Asn(88)-Ser RGS4 failed to enhance agonist function on the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) or alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2) fusion proteins. Enzyme kinetic analysis of the GTPase activity of the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) and alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2) fusion proteins demonstrated that RGS4 both substantially increased GTPase V(max) and significantly increased K(m) of the fusion proteins for GTP. The increase in K(m) for GTP was dependent upon RGS4 amount and is consistent with previously proposed mechanisms of RGS function. Agonist-stimulated GTPase turnover number in the presence of 100 nm RGS4 was substantially higher for alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) than for alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2). These studies demonstrate that although RGS4 has been described as a generic stimulator of the GTPase activity of G(i)-family G proteins, selectivity of this interaction and quantitative variation in its function can be monitored in the presence of receptor activation of the G proteins.     

Distinct roles for two Galpha-Gbeta interfaces in cell polarity control by a yeast heterotrimeric G protein

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromones trigger dissociation of a heterotrimeric G protein (Galphabetagamma) into Galpha-guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and Gbetagamma. The Gbetagamma dimer regulates both mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade signaling and cell polarization. Here, by independently activating the MAP kinase pathway, we studied the polarity role of Gbetagamma in isolation from its signaling role. MAP kinase signaling alone could induce cell asymmetry but not directional growth. Surprisingly, active Gbetagamma, either alone or with Galpha-GTP, could not organize a persistent polarization axis. Instead, following pheromone gradients (chemotropism) or directional growth without pheromone gradients (de novo polarization) required an intact receptor-Galphabetagamma module and GTP hydrolysis by Galpha. Our results indicate that chemoattractant-induced cell polarization requires continuous receptor-Galphabetagamma communication but not modulation of MAP kinase signaling. To explore regulation of Gbetagamma by Galpha, we mutated Gbeta residues in two structurally distinct Galpha-Gbeta binding interfaces. Polarity control was disrupted only by mutations in the N-terminal interface, and not the Switch interface. Incorporation of these mutations into a Gbeta-Galpha fusion protein, which enforces subunit proximity, revealed that Switch interface dissociation regulates signaling, whereas the N-terminal interface may govern receptor-Galphabetagamma coupling. These findings raise the possibility that the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer can function in a partially dissociated state, tethered by the N-terminal interface.     

Mutations in the GTP-binding site of GS alpha alter stimulation of adenylyl cyclase

Mutational replacements of specific residues in the GTP-binding pocket of the 21-kDa ras proteins (p21ras) reduce their GTPase activity. To test the possibility that the cognate regions of G protein alpha chains participate in GTP binding and hydrolysis, we compared signaling functions of normal and mutated alpha chains (termed alpha s) of Gs, the stimulatory regulator of adenylyl cyclase. alpha s chains were expressed in an alpha s-deficient S49 mouse lymphoma cell line, cyc-. alpha s in which leucine replaces glutamine 227 (corresponding to glutamine 61 of p21ras) constitutively activates adenylyl cyclase and reduces the kcat for GTP hydrolysis more than 100-fold. There is a smaller reduction in GTPase activity in another mutant in which valine replaces glycine 49 (corresponding to glycine 12 of p21ras). This mutant alpha s is a poor activator of adenylyl cyclase. Moreover, the glycine 49 protein, unlike normal alpha s, is not protected against tryptic cleavage by hydrolysis resistant GTP analogs; this finding suggests impairment of the mutant protein's ability to attain the active (GTP-bound) conformation. We conclude that alpha s residues near glutamine 227 and glycine 49 participate in binding and hydrolysis of GTP, although the GTP binding regions of alpha s and p21ras are not identical.     

Arginines 29 and 59 of elongation factor G are important for GTP hydrolysis or translocation on the ribosome

GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G (EF-G) is essential for the translocation step in protein elongation. The low intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is strongly stimulated by the ribosome. Here we show that a conserved arginine, R29, of Escherichia coli EF-G is crucial for GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome, but not for GTP binding or ribosome interaction, suggesting that it may be directly involved in catalysis. Another conserved arginine, R59, which is homologous to the catalytic arginine of G(alpha) proteins, is not essential for GTP hydrolysis, but influences ribosome binding and translocation. These results indicate that EF-G is similar to other GTPases in that an arginine residue is required for GTP hydrolysis, although the structural changes leading to GTPase activation are different.     

Specificity of Gbetagamma signaling to Kir3 channels depends on the helical domain of pertussis toxin-sensitive Galpha subunits

Acetylcholine signaling through muscarinic type 2 receptors activates atrial G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (Kir3) channels via the betagamma subunits of G proteins (Gbetagamma). Different combinations of recombinant Gbetagamma subunits have been shown to activate Kir3 channels in a similar manner. In native systems, however, only Gbetagamma subunits associated with the pertussis toxin-sensitive Galpha(i/o) subunits signal to K(+) channels. Additionally, in vitro binding experiments supported the notion that the C terminus of Kir3 channels interacts preferentially with Galpha(i) over Galpha(q). In this study we confirmed in two heterologous expression systems a preference of Galpha(i) over Galpha(q) in the activation of K(+) currents. To identify determinants of Gbetagamma signaling specificity, we first exchanged domains of Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) subunits responsible for receptor coupling selectivity and swapped their receptor coupling partners. Our results established that the G proteins, regardless of the receptor type to which they coupled, conferred specificity to Kir3 activation. We next tested signaling through chimeras between the Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) subunits in which the N terminus, the helical, or the GTPase domains of the Galpha subunits were exchanged. Our results revealed that the helical domain of Galpha(i) (residues 63-175) in the background of Galpha(q) could support Kir3 activation, whereas the reverse chimera could not. Moreover, the helical domain of the Galpha(i) subunit conferred "Galpha(i)-like" binding of the Kir3 C terminus to the Galpha(q) subunits that contained it. These results implicate the helical domain of Galpha(i) proteins as a critical determinant of Gbetagamma signaling specificity.