Designer proteins that competitively inhibit Gαq by targeting its effector site

During signal transduction, the G protein, Gα_q, binds and activates phospholipase C-β isozymes. Several diseases have been shown to manifest upon constitutively activating mutation of Gα_q, such as uveal melanoma. Therefore, methods are needed to directly inhibit Gα_q. Previously, we demonstrated that a peptide derived from a helix-turn-helix (HTH) region of PLC-β3 (residues 852–878) binds Gα_q with low micromolar affinity and inhibits Gα_q by competing with full-length PLC-β isozymes for binding. Since the HTH peptide is unstructured in the absence of Gα_q, we hypothesized that embedding the HTH in a folded protein might stabilize the binding-competent conformation and further improve the potency of inhibition. Using the molecular modeling software Rosetta, we searched the Protein Data Bank for proteins with similar HTH structures near their surface. The candidate proteins were computationally docked against Gα_q, and their surfaces were redesigned to stabilize this interaction. We then used yeast surface display to affinity mature the designs. The most potent design bound Gα_q/i with high affinity in vitro (K_D = 18 nM) and inhibited activation of PLC-β isozymes in HEK293 cells. We anticipate that our genetically encoded inhibitor will help interrogate the role of Gα_q in healthy and disease model systems. Our work demonstrates that grafting interaction motifs into folded proteins is a powerful approach for generating inhibitors of protein–protein interactions.     

Gαs directly drives PDZ-RhoGEF signaling to Cdc42

Gα proteins promote dynamic adjustments of cell shape directed by actin-cytoskeleton reorganization via their respective RhoGEF effectors. For example, Gα₁₃ binding to the RGS-homology (RH) domains of several RH-RhoGEFs allosterically activates these proteins, causing them to expose their catalytic Dbl-homology (DH)/pleckstrin-homology (PH) regions, which triggers downstream signals. However, whether additional Gα proteins might directly regulate the RH-RhoGEFs was not known. To explore this question, we first examined the morphological effects of expressing shortened RH-RhoGEF DH/PH constructs of p115RhoGEF/ARHGEF1, PDZ-RhoGEF (PRG)/ARHGEF11, and LARG/ARHGEF12. As expected, the three constructs promoted cell contraction and activated RhoA, known to be downstream of Gα₁₃. Intriguingly, PRG DH/PH also induced filopodia-like cell protrusions and activated Cdc42. This pathway was stimulated by constitutively active Gα_s (Gα_sQ227L), which enabled endogenous PRG to gain affinity for Cdc42. A chemogenetic approach revealed that signaling by G_s-coupled receptors, but not by those coupled to G_i or G_q, enabled PRG to bind Cdc42. This receptor-dependent effect, as well as CREB phosphorylation, was blocked by a construct derived from the PRG:Gα_s-binding region, PRG-linker. Active Gα_s interacted with isolated PRG DH and PH domains and their linker. In addition, this construct interfered with Gα_sQ227L''s ability to guide PRG''s interaction with Cdc42. Endogenous G_s-coupled prostaglandin receptors stimulated PRG binding to membrane fractions and activated signaling to PKA, and this canonical endogenous pathway was attenuated by PRG-linker. Altogether, our results demonstrate that active Gα_s can recognize PRG as a novel effector directing its DH/PH catalytic module to gain affinity for Cdc42.     

Structural Basis of G Protein-coupled Receptor-Gi Protein Interaction: FORMATION OF THE CANNABINOID CB2 RECEPTOR-Gi PROTEIN COMPLEX*

In this study, we applied a comprehensive G protein-coupled receptor-Gα_i protein chemical cross-linking strategy to map the cannabinoid receptor subtype 2 (CB₂)- Gα_i interface and then used molecular dynamics simulations to explore the dynamics of complex formation. Three cross-link sites were identified using LC-MS/MS and electrospray ionization-MS/MS as follows: 1) a sulfhydryl cross-link between C3.53(134) in TMH3 and the Gα_i C-terminal i-3 residue Cys-351; 2) a lysine cross-link between K6.35(245) in TMH6 and the Gα_i C-terminal i-5 residue, Lys-349; and 3) a lysine cross-link between K5.64(215) in TMH5 and the Gα_i α₄β₆ loop residue, Lys-317. To investigate the dynamics and nature of the conformational changes involved in CB₂·G_i complex formation, we carried out microsecond-time scale molecular dynamics simulations of the CB₂ R*·Gα_i1β₁γ₂ complex embedded in a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidylcholine bilayer, using cross-linking information as validation. Our results show that although molecular dynamics simulations started with the G protein orientation in the β2-AR*·Gα_sβ₁γ₂ complex crystal structure, the Gα_i1β₁γ₂ protein reoriented itself within 300 ns. Two major changes occurred as follows. 1) The Gα_i1 α5 helix tilt changed due to the outward movement of TMH5 in CB₂ R*. 2) A 25° clockwise rotation of Gα_i1β₁γ₂ underneath CB₂ R* occurred, with rotation ceasing when Pro-139 (IC-2 loop) anchors in a hydrophobic pocket on Gα_i1 (Val-34, Leu-194, Phe-196, Phe-336, Thr-340, Ile-343, and Ile-344). In this complex, all three experimentally identified cross-links can occur. These findings should be relevant for other class A G protein-coupled receptors that couple to G_i proteins.     

Type 1 Cannabinoid Receptor Ligands Display Functional Selectivity in a Cell Culture Model of Striatal Medium Spiny Projection Neurons

Modulation of type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB₁) activity has been touted as a potential means of treating addiction, anxiety, depression, and neurodegeneration. Different agonists of CB₁ are known to evoke varied responses in vivo. Functional selectivity is the ligand-specific activation of certain signal transduction pathways at a receptor that can signal through multiple pathways. To understand cannabinoid-specific functional selectivity, different groups have examined the effect of individual cannabinoids on various signaling pathways in heterologous expression systems. In the current study, we compared the functional selectivity of six cannabinoids, including two endocannabinoids (2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA)), two synthetic cannabinoids (WIN55,212-2 and CP55,940), and two phytocannabinoids (cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)) on arrestin2-, Gα_i/o-, Gβγ-, Gα_s-, and Gα_q-mediated intracellular signaling in the mouse STHdh^Q7/Q7 cell culture model of striatal medium spiny projection neurons that endogenously express CB₁. In this system, 2-AG, THC, and CP55,940 were more potent mediators of arrestin2 recruitment than other cannabinoids tested. 2-AG, AEA, and WIN55,212-2, enhanced Gα_i/o and Gβγ signaling, with 2-AG and AEA treatment leading to increased total CB₁ levels. 2-AG, AEA, THC, and WIN55,212-2 also activated Gα_q-dependent pathways. CP55,940 and CBD both signaled through Gα_s. CP55,940, but not CBD, activated downstream Gα_s pathways via CB₁ targets. THC and CP55,940 promoted CB₁ internalization and decreased CB₁ protein levels over an 18-h period. These data demonstrate that individual cannabinoids display functional selectivity at CB₁ leading to activation of distinct signaling pathways. To effectively match cannabinoids with therapeutic goals, these compounds must be screened for their signaling bias.     

A Chemical Biology Approach Demonstrates G Protein βγ Subunits Are Sufficient to Mediate Directional Neutrophil Chemotaxis

Our laboratory has identified a number of small molecules that bind to G protein βγ subunits (Gβγ) by competing for peptide binding to the Gβγ “hot spot.” M119/Gallein were identified as inhibitors of Gβγ subunit signaling. Here we examine the activity of another molecule identified in this screen, 12155, which we show that in contrast to M119/Gallein had no effect on Gβγ-mediated phospholipase C or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) γ activation in vitro. Also in direct contrast to M119/Gallein, 12155 caused receptor-independent Ca²⁺ release, and activated other downstream targets of Gβγ including extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK), protein kinase B (Akt) in HL60 cells differentiated to neutrophils. We show that 12155 releases Gβγ in vitro from Gα_i1β₁γ₂ heterotrimers by causing its dissociation from GαGDP without inducing nucleotide exchange in the Gα subunit. We used this novel probe to examine the hypothesis that Gβγ release is sufficient to direct chemotaxis of neutrophils in the absence of receptor or G protein α subunit activation. 12155 directed chemotaxis of HL60 cells and primary neutrophils in a transwell migration assay with responses similar to those seen for the natural chemotactic peptide n-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe. These data indicate that release of free Gβγ is sufficient to drive directional chemotaxis in a G protein-coupled receptor signaling-independent manner.     

The GPCR–β-arrestin complex allosterically activates C-Raf by binding its amino terminus

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) convert external stimuli into cellular signals through heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) and β-arrestins (βarrs). In a βarr-dependent signaling pathway, βarrs link GPCRs to various downstream signaling partners, such as the Raf–mitogen-activated protein kinase extracellular signal–regulated kinase–extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade. Agonist-stimulated GPCR–βarr complexes have been shown to interact with C-Raf and are thought to initiate the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway through simple tethering of these signaling partners. However, recent evidence shows that in addition to canonical scaffolding functions, βarrs can allosterically activate downstream targets, such as the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Src. Here, we demonstrate the direct allosteric activation of C-Raf by GPCR–βarr1 complexes in vitro. Furthermore, we show that βarr1 in complex with a synthetic phosphopeptide mimicking the human V2 vasopressin receptor tail that binds and functionally activates βarrs also allosterically activates C-Raf. We reveal that the interaction between the phosphorylated GPCR C terminus and βarr1 is necessary and sufficient for C-Raf activation. Interestingly, the interaction between βarr1 and C-Raf was considerably reduced in the presence of excess activated H-Ras, a small GTPase known to activate C-Raf, suggesting that H-Ras and βarr1 bind to the same region on C-Raf. Furthermore, we found that βarr1 interacts with the Ras-binding domain of C-Raf. Taken together, these data suggest that in addition to canonical scaffolding functions, GPCR–βarr complexes directly allosterically activate C-Raf by binding to its amino terminus. This work provides novel insights into how βarrs regulate effector molecules to activate downstream signaling pathways.     

Constitutive Gαi Coupling Activity of Very Large G Protein-coupled Receptor 1 (VLGR1) and Its Regulation by PDZD7 Protein

The very large G protein-coupled receptor 1 (VLGR1) is a core component in inner ear hair cell development. Mutations in the vlgr1 gene cause Usher syndrome, the symptoms of which include congenital hearing loss and progressive retinitis pigmentosa. However, the mechanism of VLGR1-regulated intracellular signaling and its role in Usher syndrome remain elusive. Here, we show that VLGR1 is processed into two fragments after autocleavage at the G protein-coupled receptor proteolytic site. The cleaved VLGR1 β-subunit constitutively inhibited adenylate cyclase (AC) activity through Gα_i coupling. Co-expression of the Gα_iq chimera with the VLGR1 β-subunit changed its activity to the phospholipase C/nuclear factor of activated T cells signaling pathway, which demonstrates the Gα_i protein coupling specificity of this subunit. An R6002A mutation in intracellular loop 2 of VLGR1 abolished Gα_i coupling, but the pathogenic VLGR1 Y6236fsx1 mutant showed increased AC inhibition. Furthermore, overexpression of another Usher syndrome protein, PDZD7, decreased the AC inhibition of the VLGR1 β-subunit but showed no effect on the VLGR1 Y6236fsx1 mutant. Taken together, we identified an independent Gα_i signaling pathway of the VLGR1 β-subunit and its regulatory mechanisms that may have a role in the development of Usher syndrome.     

WDR26 Functions as a Scaffolding Protein to Promote Gβγ-mediated Phospholipase C β2 (PLCβ2) Activation in Leukocytes

We have recently identified WDR26 as a novel WD40 repeat protein that binds Gβγ and promotes Gβγ signaling during leukocyte migration. Here, we have determined the mechanism by which WDR26 enhances Gβγ-mediated phospholipase C β2 (PLCβ2) activation in leukocytes. We show that WDR26 not only directly bound Gβγ but also PLCβ2. The binding sites of WDR26 and PLCβ2 on Gβ₁γ₂ were overlapping but not identical. WDR26 used the same domains for binding Gβγ and PLCβ but still formed a signaling complex with Gβγ and PLCβ2 probably due to the fact that WDR26 formed a higher order oligomer through its Lis homology and C-terminal to LisH (LisH-CTLH) and WD40 domains. Additional studies indicated that the formation of higher order oligomers was required for WDR26 to promote PLCβ2 interaction with and activation by Gβγ. Moreover, WDR26 was required for PLCβ2 translocation from the cytosol to the membrane in polarized leukocytes, and the translocation of PLCβ2 was sufficient to cause partial activation of PLCβ2. Collectively, our data indicate that WDR26 functions as a scaffolding protein to promote PLCβ2 membrane translocation and interaction with Gβγ, thereby enhancing PLCβ2 activation in leukocytes. These findings have identified a novel mechanism of regulating Gβγ signaling through a scaffolding protein.     

Synthesis and bioactivities evaluation of oleanolic acid oxime ester derivatives as α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitors

Different oleanolic acid (OA) oxime ester derivatives (3a-3t) were designed and synthesised to develop inhibitors against α-glucosidase and α-amylase. All the synthesised OA derivatives were evaluated against α-glucosidase and α-amylase in vitro. Among them, compound 3a showed the highest α-glucosidase inhibition with an IC₅₀ of 0.35 µM, which was ∼1900 times stronger than that of acarbose, meanwhile compound 3f exhibited the highest α-amylase inhibitory with an IC₅₀ of 3.80 µM that was ∼26 times higher than that of acarbose. The inhibition kinetic studies showed that the inhibitory mechanism of compounds 3a and 3f were reversible and mixed types towards α-glucosidase and α-amylase, respectively. Molecular docking studies analysed the interaction between compound and two enzymes, respectively. Furthermore, cytotoxicity evaluation assay demonstrated a high level of safety profile of compounds 3a and 3f against 3T3-L1 and HepG2 cells.

Highlights

1. Oleanolic acid oxime ester derivatives (3a–3t) were synthesised and screened against α-glucosidase and α-amylase.
2. Compound 3a showed the highest α-glucosidase inhibitory with IC50 of 0.35 µM.
3. Compound 3f presented the highest α-amylase inhibitory with IC50 of 3.80 µM.
4. Kinetic studies and in silico studies analysed the binding between compounds and α-glucosidase or α-amylase.

     

Crystal Structures of the Scaffolding Protein LGN Reveal the General Mechanism by Which GoLoco Binding Motifs Inhibit the Release of GDP from Gαi

GoLoco (GL) motif-containing proteins regulate G protein signaling by binding to Gα subunit and acting as guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors. GLs of LGN are also known to bind the GDP form of Gα_i/o during asymmetric cell division. Here, we show that the C-terminal GL domain of LGN binds four molecules of Gα_i·GDP. The crystal structures of Gα_i·GDP in complex with LGN GL3 and GL4, respectively, reveal distinct GL/Gα_i interaction features when compared with the only high resolution structure known with GL/Gα_i interaction between RGS14 and Gα_i1. Only a few residues C-terminal to the conserved GL sequence are required for LGN GLs to bind to Gα_i·GDP. A highly conserved “double Arg finger” sequence (RΨ(D/E)(D/E)QR) is responsible for LGN GL to bind to GDP bound to Gα_i. Together with the sequence alignment, we suggest that the LGN GL/Gα_i interaction represents a general binding mode between GL motifs and Gα_i. We also show that LGN GLs are potent guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors.     

Moieties of Complement iC3b Recognized by the I-domain of Integrin αXβ2

Complement fragment iC3b serves as a major opsonin for facilitating phagocytosis via its interaction with complement receptors CR3 and CR4, also known by their leukocyte integrin family names, αMβ2 and αXβ2, respectively. Although there is general agreement that iC3b binds to the αM and αX I-domains of the respective β2-integrins, much less is known regarding the regions of iC3b contributing to the αX I-domain binding. In this study, using recombinant αX I-domain, as well as recombinant fragments of iC3b as candidate binding partners, we have identified two distinct binding moieties of iC3b for the αX I-domain. They are the C3 convertase-generated N-terminal segment of the C3b α’-chain (α’NT) and the factor I cleavage-generated N-terminal segment in the CUBf region of α-chain. Additionally, we have found that the CUBf segment is a novel binding moiety of iC3b for the αM I-domain. The CUBf segment shows about a 2-fold higher binding activity than the α’NT for αX I-domain. We also have shown the involvement of crucial acidic residues on the iC3b side of the interface and basic residues on the I-domain side.     

Activation of Distinct α5β1-mediated Signaling Pathways by Fibronectin's Cell Adhesion and Matrix Assembly Domains

The interaction of cells with fibronectin generates a series of complex signaling events that serve to regulate several aspects of cell behavior, including growth, differentiation, adhesion, and motility. The formation of a fibronectin matrix is a dynamic, cell-mediated process that involves both ligation of the α₅β₁ integrin with the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence in fibronectin and binding of the amino terminus of fibronectin to cell surface receptors, termed “matrix assembly sites,” which mediate the assembly of soluble fibronectin into insoluble fibrils. Our data demonstrate that the amino-terminal type I repeats of fibronectin bind to the α₅β₁ integrin and support cell adhesion. Furthermore, the amino terminus of fibronectin modulates actin assembly, focal contact formation, tyrosine kinase activity, and cell migration. Amino-terminal fibronectin fragments and RGD peptides were able to cross-compete for binding to the α₅β₁ integrin, suggesting that these two domains of fibronectin cannot bind to the α₅β₁ integrin simultaneously. Cell adhesion to the amino-terminal domain of fibronectin was enhanced by cytochalasin D, suggesting that the ligand specificity of the α₅β₁ integrin is regulated by the cytoskeleton. These data suggest a new paradigm for integrin-mediated signaling, where distinct regions within one ligand can modulate outside-in signaling through the same integrin.     

Affinity Modulation of Platelet Integrin αIIbβ3 by β3-Endonexin, a Selective Binding Partner of the β3 Integrin Cytoplasmic Tail

Platelet agonists increase the affinity state of integrin α_IIbβ₃, a prerequisite for fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregation. This process may be triggered by a regulatory molecule(s) that binds to the integrin cytoplasmic tails, causing a structural change in the receptor. β₃-Endonexin is a novel 111–amino acid protein that binds selectively to the β₃ tail. Since β₃-endonexin is present in platelets, we asked whether it can affect α_IIbβ₃ function. When β₃-endonexin was fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and transfected into CHO cells, it was found in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus and could be detected on Western blots of cell lysates. PAC1, a fibrinogen-mimetic mAb, was used to monitor α_IIbβ₃ affinity state in transfected cells by flow cytometry. Cells transfected with GFP and α_IIbβ₃ bound little or no PAC1. However, those transfected with GFP/β₃-endonexin and α_IIbβ₃ bound PAC1 specifically in an energy-dependent fashion, and they underwent fibrinogen-dependent aggregation. GFP/β₃-endonexin did not affect levels of surface expression of α_IIbβ₃ nor did it modulate the affinity of an α_IIbβ₃ mutant that is defective in binding to β₃-endonexin. Affinity modulation of α_IIbβ₃ by GFP/β₃-endonexin was inhibited by coexpression of either a monomeric β₃ cytoplasmic tail chimera or an activated form of H-Ras. These results demonstrate that β₃-endonexin can modulate the affinity state of α_IIbβ₃ in a manner that is structurally specific and subject to metabolic regulation. By analogy, the adhesive function of platelets may be regulated by such protein–protein interactions at the level of the cytoplasmic tails of α_IIbβ₃.     

Regulation of the AGS3·Gαi Signaling Complex by a Seven-transmembrane Span Receptor

G-protein signaling modulators (GPSM) play diverse functional roles through their interaction with G-protein subunits. AGS3 (GPSM1) contains four G-protein regulatory motifs (GPR) that directly bind Gα_i free of Gβγ providing an unusual scaffold for the “G-switch” and signaling complexes, but the mechanism by which signals track into this scaffold are not well understood. We report the regulation of the AGS3·Gα_i signaling module by a cell surface, seven-transmembrane receptor. AGS3 and Gα_i1 tagged with Renilla luciferase or yellow fluorescent protein expressed in mammalian cells exhibited saturable, specific bioluminescence resonance energy transfer indicating complex formation in the cell. Activation of α₂-adrenergic receptors or μ-opioid receptors reduced AGS3-RLuc·Gα_i1-YFP energy transfer by over 30%. The agonist-mediated effects were inhibited by pertussis toxin and co-expression of RGS4, but were not altered by Gβγ sequestration with the carboxyl terminus of GRK2. Gα_i-dependent and agonist-sensitive bioluminescence resonance energy transfer was also observed between AGS3 and cell-surface receptors typically coupled to Gα_i and/or Gα_o indicating that AGS3 is part of a larger signaling complex. Upon receptor activation, AGS3 reversibly dissociates from this complex at the cell cortex. Receptor coupling to both Gαβγ and GPR-Gα_i offer additional flexibility for systems to respond and adapt to challenges and orchestrate complex behaviors.     

In vitro and in silico studies of bis (indol-3-yl) methane derivatives as potential α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitors

In this paper, bis (indol-3-yl) methanes (BIMs) were synthesised and evaluated for their inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase and α-amylase. All synthesised compounds showed potential α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activities. Compounds 5 g (IC₅₀: 7.54 ± 1.10 μM), 5e (IC₅₀: 9.00 ± 0.97 μM), and 5 h (IC₅₀: 9.57 ± 0.62 μM) presented strongest inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase, that were ∼ 30 times stronger than acarbose. Compounds 5 g (IC₅₀: 32.18 ± 1.66 µM), 5 h (IC₅₀: 31.47 ± 1.42 µM), and 5 s (IC₅₀: 30.91 ± 0.86 µM) showed strongest inhibitory activities towards α-amylase, ∼ 2.5 times stronger than acarbose. The mechanisms and docking simulation of the compounds were also studied. Compounds 5 g and 5 h exhibited bifunctional inhibitory activity against these two enzymes. Furthermore, compounds showed no toxicity against 3T3-L1 cells and HepG2 cells.

Highlights

1. A series of bis (indol-3-yl) methanes (BIMs) were synthesised and evaluated inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase and α-amylase.
2. Compound 5g exhibited promising activity (IC₅₀ = 7.54 ± 1.10 μM) against α-glucosidase.
3. Compound 5s exhibited promising activity (IC₅₀ = 30.91 ± 0.86 μM) against α-amylase.
4. In silico studies were performed to confirm the binding interactions of synthetic compounds with the enzyme active site.

     

Direct and Regulated Interaction of Integrin αEβ7 with E-Cadherin

The cadherins are a family of homophilic adhesion molecules that play a vital role in the formation of cellular junctions and in tissue morphogenesis. Members of the integrin family are also involved in cell to cell adhesion, but bind heterophilically to immunoglobulin superfamily molecules such as intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)–1, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)–1, or mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule (MadCAM)–1. Recently, an interaction between epithelial (E-) cadherin and the mucosal lymphocyte integrin, α_Eβ₇, has been proposed. Here, we demonstrate that a human E-cadherin–Fc fusion protein binds directly to soluble recombinant α_Eβ₇, and to α_Eβ₇ solubilized from intraepithelial T lymphocytes. Furthermore, intraepithelial lymphocytes or transfected JY′ cells expressing the α_Eβ₇ integrin adhere strongly to purified E-cadherin–Fc coated on plastic, and the adhesion can be inhibited by antibodies to α_Eβ₇ or E-cadherin.

The binding of α_Eβ₇ integrin to cadherins is selective since cell adhesion to P-cadherin–Fc through α_Eβ₇ requires >100-fold more fusion protein than to E-cadherin–Fc. Although the structure of the α_E-chain is unique among integrins, the avidity of α_Eβ₇ for E-cadherin can be regulated by divalent cations or phorbol myristate acetate. Cross-linking of the T cell receptor complex on intraepithelial lymphocytes increases the avidity of α_Eβ₇ for E-cadherin, and may provide a mechanism for the adherence and activation of lymphocytes within the epithelium in the presence of specific foreign antigen. Thus, despite its dissimilarity to known integrin ligands, the specific molecular interaction demonstrated here indicates that E-cadherin is a direct counter receptor for the α_Eβ₇ integrin.

     

Complementary Roles for Receptor Clustering and Conformational Change in the Adhesive and Signaling Functions of Integrin αIIbβ3

Integrin α_IIbβ₃ mediates platelet aggregation and “outside-in” signaling. It is regulated by changes in receptor conformation and affinity and/or by lateral diffusion and receptor clustering. To document the relative contributions of conformation and clustering to α_IIbβ₃ function, α_IIb was fused at its cytoplasmic tail to one or two FKBP12 repeats (FKBP). These modified α_IIb subunits were expressed with β₃ in CHO cells, and the heterodimers could be clustered into morphologically detectable oligomers upon addition of AP1510, a membrane-permeable, bivalent FKBP ligand. Integrin clustering by AP1510 caused binding of fibrinogen and a multivalent (but not monovalent) fibrinogen-mimetic antibody. However, ligand binding due to clustering was only 25–50% of that observed when α_IIbβ₃ affinity was increased by an activating antibody or an activating mutation. The effects of integrin clustering and affinity modulation were additive, and clustering promoted irreversible ligand binding. Clustering of α_IIbβ₃ also promoted cell adhesion to fibrinogen or von Willebrand factor, but not as effectively as affinity modulation. However, clustering was sufficient to trigger fibrinogen-independent tyrosine phosphorylation of pp72^Syk and fibrinogen-dependent phosphorylation of pp125^FAK, even in non-adherent cells. Thus, receptor clustering and affinity modulation play complementary roles in α_IIbβ₃ function. Affinity modulation is the predominant regulator of ligand binding and cell adhesion, but clustering increases these responses further and triggers protein tyrosine phosphorylation, even in the absence of affinity modulation. Both affinity modulation and clustering may be needed for optimal function of α_IIbβ₃ in platelets.     

Na/H Exchanger Regulatory Factors Control Parathyroid Hormone Receptor Signaling by Facilitating Differential Activation of Gα Protein Subunits

The Na/H exchanger regulatory factors, NHERF1 and NHERF2, are adapter proteins involved in targeting and assembly of protein complexes. The parathyroid hormone receptor (PTHR) interacts with both NHERF1 and NHERF2. The NHERF proteins toggle PTHR signaling from predominantly activation of adenylyl cyclase in the absence of NHERF to principally stimulation of phospholipase C when the NHERF proteins are expressed. We hypothesized that this signaling switch occurs at the level of the G protein. We measured G protein activation by [³⁵S]GTPγS binding and Gα subtype-specific immunoprecipitation using three different cellular models of PTHR signaling. These studies revealed that PTHR interactions with NHERF1 enhance receptor-mediated stimulation of Gα_q but have no effect on stimulation of Gα_i or Gα_s. In contrast, PTHR associations with NHERF2 enhance receptor-mediated stimulation of both Gα_q and Gα_i but decrease stimulation of Gα_s. Consistent with these functional data, NHERF2 formed cellular complexes with both Gα_q and Gα_i, whereas NHERF1 was found to interact only with Gα_q. These findings demonstrate that NHERF interactions regulate PTHR signaling at the level of G proteins and that NHERF1 and NHERF2 exhibit isotype-specific effects on G protein activation.     

α-Synuclein facilitates endocytosis by elevating the steady-state levels of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate

α-Synuclein (α-Syn) is a protein implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson''s disease (PD). It is an intrinsically disordered protein that binds acidic phospholipids. Growing evidence supports a role for α-Syn in membrane trafficking, including, mechanisms of endocytosis and exocytosis, although the exact role of α-Syn in these mechanisms is currently unclear. Here we investigate the associations of α-Syn with the acidic phosphoinositides (PIPs), phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P₂) and phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate (PI(3,4)P₂). Our results show that α-Syn colocalizes with PIP₂ and the phosphorylated active form of the clathrin adaptor protein 2 (AP2) at clathrin-coated pits. Using endocytosis of transferrin as an indicator for clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), we find that α-Syn involvement in endocytosis is specifically mediated through PI(4,5)P₂ levels on the plasma membrane. In accord with their effects on PI(4,5)P₂ levels, the PD associated A30P, E46K, and A53T mutations in α-Syn further enhance CME in neuronal and nonneuronal cells. However, lysine to glutamic acid substitutions at the KTKEGV repeat domain of α-Syn, which interfere with phospholipid binding, are ineffective in enhancing CME. We further show that the rate of synaptic vesicle (SV) endocytosis is differentially affected by the α-Syn mutations and associates with their effects on PI(4,5)P₂ levels, however, with the exception of the A30P mutation. This study provides evidence for a critical involvement of PIPs in α-Syn–mediated membrane trafficking.     

Evidence that Distinct States of the Integrin α6β1 Interact with Laminin and an ADAM

Integrins can exist in different functional states with low or high binding capacity for particular ligands. We previously provided evidence that the integrin α6β1, on mouse eggs and on α6-transfected cells, interacted with the disintegrin domain of the sperm surface protein ADAM 2 (fertilin β). In the present study we tested the hypothesis that different states of α6β1 interact with fertilin and laminin, an extracellular matrix ligand for α6β1. Using α6-transfected cells we found that treatments (e.g., with phorbol myristate acetate or MnCl₂) that increased adhesion to laminin inhibited sperm binding. Conversely, treatments that inhibited laminin adhesion increased sperm binding. Next, we compared the ability of fluorescent beads coated with either fertilin β or with the laminin E8 fragment to bind to eggs. In Ca²⁺-containing media, fertilin β beads bound to eggs via an interaction mediated by the disintegrin loop of fertilin β and by the α6 integrin subunit. In Ca²⁺-containing media, laminin E8 beads did not bind to eggs. Treatment of eggs with phorbol myristate acetate or with the actin disrupting agent, latrunculin A, inhibited fertilin bead binding, but did not induce laminin E8 bead binding. Treatment of eggs with Mn²⁺ dramatically increased laminin E8 bead binding, and inhibited fertilin bead binding. Our results provide the first evidence that different states of an integrin (α6β1) can interact with an extracellular matrix ligand (laminin) or a membrane-anchored cell surface ligand (ADAM 2).