Circadian Time Structure of Cardiovascular Characteristics in Human Pregnancy

Conventional time-unspecified single measurements of blood pressure and heart rate may be misleading because they may be influenced, among other factors, by the patient's emotional state, position, diet, and external stimuli. All of these effects depend on the stages of a (mathematical) spectrum of rhythms and trends with age. The evaluation of predictable variability in blood pressure and heart rate by (a) the use of fully ambulatory devices, and (b) chronobiologic data processing, assesses early cardiovascular disease risk, e.g., in pregnancy. We have used this approach to quantify changes in 24-h synchronized (circadian) characteristics of cardiovascular variables in two consecutive pregnancies of a clinically healthy woman. Blood pressure and heart rate were automatically monitored, with few interruptions, at I-h intervals, each time for at least 48 consecutive h, and for a total of 76 days of monitoring in each pregnancy. Circadian parameters of those circulatory variables were computed for each single day of measurement by the least-squares fit of a 24-h cosine curve. Regression analysis of parameters thus obtained revealed patterns of variation of circadian-rhythm-adjusted means and amplitudes with gestational age. In both pregnancies, the predictable variability of the circadian-rhythm-adjusted mean of blood pressure can be approximated by a second-order polynomial model on gestational age: a steady linear decrease in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure up to the 22nd week of pregnancy is followed by an increase in blood pressure up to the day of delivery. This longitudinal study confirms and extends to ambulatory everyday life conditions the predictable pregnancy-associated variability in blood pressure and heart rate and also allows the establishment of prediction and confidence limits for cardiovascular parameters in a healthy pregnancy.     

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring for the Early Identification of Hypertension in Pregnancy

Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are major contributors to perinatal morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of gestational hypertension still relies on conventional clinic blood pressure (BP) measurements and thresholds of ≥140/90?mm Hg for systolic (SBP)/diastolic (DBP) BP. However, the correlation between BP level and target organ damage, cardiovascular disease risk, and long-term prognosis is greater for ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) than clinic BP measurement. Accordingly, ABPM has been suggested as the logical approach to overcoming the low sensitivity and specificity of clinic BP measurements in pregnancy. With the use of ABPM, differing predictable BP patterns throughout gestation have been identified for clinically healthy and hypertensive pregnant women. In normotensive pregnancies, BP steadily decreases up to the middle of gestation and then increases up to the day of delivery. In contrast, women who develop gestational hypertension or preeclampsia show stable BP during the first half of pregnancy and a continuous linear BP increase thereafter until delivery. Epidemiologic studies have also consistently reported sex differences in the 24-h patterns of ambulatory BP and heart rate. Typically, men exhibit a lower heart rate and higher BP than women, the differences being larger for SBP than DBP. Additionally, as early as in the first trimester of gestation, statistically significant increased 24-h SBP and DBP means characterize women complicated with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia compared with women with uncomplicated pregnancies. However, the normally lower BP in nongravid women as compared with men, additional decrease in BP during the second trimester of gestation in normotensive but not in hypertensive pregnant women, and significant differences in the 24-h BP pattern between healthy and complicated pregnancies at all gestational ages have not been taken into consideration when establishing reference BP thresholds for the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy. Several studies reported that use of the 24-h BP mean is not a proper test for an individualized early diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy defined on the basis of cuff BP measurements, thus concluding that from such an awkward approach ABPM is not useful in pregnancy. The 24-h BP pattern that characterizes healthy pregnant women at all gestational ages suggests the use for diagnosis of a time-specified reference limit reflecting that mostly predictable BP variability. Once the time-varying threshold, given, for instance, by the upper limit of a tolerance interval, is available, the hyperbaric index (HBI), as a determinant of BP excess, can be calculated as the total area of any given subject's BP above the threshold. This tolerance-hyperbaric test, where diagnosis of gestational hypertension is based on the HBI calculated with reference to a time-specified tolerance limit, has been shown to provide high sensitivity and specificity for the early identification of subsequent hypertension in pregnancy, as well as a valuable approach for prediction of pregnancy outcome. ABPM during gestation, starting preferably at the time of the first obstetric check-up following positive confirmation of pregnancy, provides sensitive endpoints for use in early risk assessment and guide for establishing prophylactic or therapeutic intervention, and should thus be regarded as the required standard for the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Body height and blood pressure regulation in humans during anti-orthostatic tilting

The hypothesis was tested that the cardiovascular changes during an upper body anti-orthostatic maneuver in humans are more pronounced in tall than in short individuals, because of the larger intravascular hydrostatic pressure gradients. In 34 males and 41 females [20-30 yr, body height (BH) = 147-206 cm], inter-individual multiple linear regression analyses adjusted for gender and body weight were conducted between changes in cardiovascular variables versus BH during tilting of the upper body from vertical to horizontal while keeping the legs horizontal. In all the subjects, tilting induced increases in stroke volume and arterial pulse pressure and a decrease in heart rate, which each correlated significantly with BH. In males (n = 51, BH = 163-206 cm), 24-h ambulatory mean arterial pressure increased significantly with BH (P = 0.004, r = 0.40, α = 0.15 mmHg/cm) so that systolic/diastolic blood pressure increased by 2/2 mmHg per 15 cm increase in BH. There was no significant correlation between mean arterial pressure and BH in females (n = 53, BH = 147-193 cm). In conclusion, a larger BH induces larger cardiovascular changes during anti-orthostatic tilting, and in males 24-h ambulatory mean arterial pressure increases with BH. The lack of a mean arterial pressure to BH correlation in females is probably because of their lower BH and greater variability in blood pressure.     

Circadian Blood Pressure Variability in Normotensive Pregnant Women as a Function of Parity,Maternal Age,and Stage of Gestation

Studies based on conventional office blood pressure (BP) measurements concluded that both maternal age and parity have significant effects on BP during pregnancy. Previous results have also indicated predictable trends of BP variability with gestational age. Accordingly, we have evaluated possible differences in the circadian pattern of ambulatory BP as a function of parity, maternal age, and stage of gestation in normotensive women who were systematically studied by ambulatory BP monitoring during their pregnancies. We analyzed 1408 BP profiles obtained from 126 nulliparous and 109 multiparous pregnant women sampled for 48 consecutive h every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit (usually within the first trimester of pregnancy) until delivery. Data were divided for comparative analysis according to parity (nulliparous versus multiparous), age (≤25, 26–30, 31–35, and ≥36 yrs), and trimester of gestation. Circadian BP parameters established by population multiple‐components analysis were compared between groups using a nonparametric test. A highly statistically significant circadian pattern described by a model that includes components with periods of 24 and 12 h is demonstrated for systolic and diastolic BP for all groups of pregnant women in all trimesters (always p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the 24 h mean among groups divided by parity at any age or stage of pregnancy. A trend of increasing BP with age was found for diastolic but not for systolic BP. Although statistically significant, differences in the 24 h mean of diastolic BP among groups divided by age were always less than 2 mm Hg. Data obtained from systematic ambulatory monitoring in normotensive pregnant women indicate the lack of differences in BP according to parity. The small, although significant, increase in diastolic BP with age may have scarce influence in the proper identification of women with gestational hypertension. Reference thresholds for BP to be used in the early identification of hypertensive complications in pregnancy could thus be developed as a function of the rest‐activity cycle and gestational age only, and independently of parity or maternal age.     

Circadian blood pressure variability in normotensive pregnant women as a function of parity, maternal age, and stage of gestation

Studies based on conventional office blood pressure (BP) measurements concluded that both maternal age and parity have significant effects on BP during pregnancy. Previous results have also indicated predictable trends of BP variability with gestational age. Accordingly, we have evaluated possible differences in the circadian pattern of ambulatory BP as a function of parity, maternal age, and stage of gestation in normotensive women who were systematically studied by ambulatory BP monitoring during their pregnancies. We analyzed 1408 BP profiles obtained from 126 nulliparous and 109 multiparous pregnant women sampled for 48 consecutive h every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit (usually within the first trimester of pregnancy) until delivery. Data were divided for comparative analysis according to parity (nulliparous versus multiparous), age (< or = 25, 26-30, 31-35, and > or = 36 yrs), and trimester of gestation. Circadian BP parameters established by population multiple-components analysis were compared between groups using a nonparametric test. A highly statistically significant circadian pattern described by a model that includes components with periods of 24 and 12h is demonstrated for systolic and diastolic BP for all groups of pregnant women in all trimesters (always p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 24h mean among groups divided by parity at any age or stage of pregnancy. A trend of increasing BP with age was found for diastolic but not for systolic BP. Although statistically significant, differences in the 24h mean of diastolic BP among groups divided by age were always less than 2 mm Hg. Data obtained from systematic ambulatory monitoring in normotensive pregnant women indicate the lack of differences in BP according to parity. The small, although significant, increase in diastolic BP with age may have scarce influence in the proper identification of women with gestational hypertension. Reference thresholds for BP to be used in the early identification of hypertensive complications in pregnancy could thus be developed as a function of the rest-activity cycle and gestational age only, and independently of parity or maternal age.     

EFFECTS OF AEROBIC EXERCISE ON THE CIRCADIAN RHYTHM OF HEART RATE AND BLOOD PRESSURE

Although the effects of aerobic exercise on resting heart rate, heart rate variability, and blood pressure have been investigated, there are scant data on the effects of aerobic exercise on the circadian rhythm of such cardiovascular parameters. In this study, we investigated the effects of aerobic exercise on the 24?h rhythm of heart rate and ambulatory blood pressure in the morning, when cardiovascular events are more common. Thirty-five healthy young subjects were randomized to control and aerobic exercise groups. Subjects in the latter group participated in their respective exercise program for two months, while those in the former group did not exercise. Twenty-four-hour electrocardiogram and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data were obtained at baseline and at the end of the exercise intervention. The control group showed no changes, while the aerobic exercise group showed a significant decrease in heart rate (73.7?±?6.6?bpm to 69.5?±?5.1?bpm, p?<?0.005) and sympathetic activity such as LF/HF ratio (2.0?±?0.7 to 1.8?±?0.6, p?<?0.05) throughout the 24?h period, particularly in the daytime. The decrease in the heart rate was most prominent in the morning. However, heart rate and LF/HF ratio showed no statistical changes during the night. No significant changes were observed in blood pressure. These findings suggest aerobic exercise exerts beneficial effects on the circadian rhythm of heart rate, especially in the morning. (Author correspondence: hshio@kobe-u.ac.jp)     

Phase Synchronization of Hemodynamic Variables at Rest and after Deep Breathing Measured during the Course of Pregnancy

Background

The autonomic nervous system plays a central role in the functioning of systems critical for the homeostasis maintenance. However, its role in the cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy-related demands is poorly understood. We explored the maternal cardiovascular systems throughout pregnancy to quantify pregnancy-related autonomic nervous system adaptations.

Methodology

Continuous monitoring of heart rate (R-R interval; derived from the 3-lead electrocardiography), blood pressure, and thoracic impedance was carried out in thirty-six women at six time-points throughout pregnancy. In order to quantify in addition to the longitudinal effects on baseline levels throughout gestation the immediate adaptive heart rate and blood pressure changes at each time point, a simple reflex test, deep breathing, was applied. Consequently, heart rate variability and blood pressure variability in the low (LF) and high (HF) frequency range, respiration and baroreceptor sensitivity were analyzed in resting conditions and after deep breathing. The adjustment of the rhythms of the R-R interval, blood pressure and respiration partitioned for the sympathetic and the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system were quantified by the phase synchronization index γ, which has been adopted from the analysis of weakly coupled chaotic oscillators.

Results

Heart rate and LF/HF ratio increased throughout pregnancy and these effects were accompanied by a continuous loss of baroreceptor sensitivity. The increases in heart rate and LF/HF ratio levels were associated with an increasing decline in the ability to flexibly respond to additional demands (i.e., diminished adaptive responses to deep breathing). The phase synchronization index γ showed that the observed effects could be explained by a decreased coupling of respiration and the cardiovascular system (HF components of heart rate and blood pressure).

Conclusions/Significance

The findings suggest that during the course of pregnancy the individual systems become increasingly independent to meet the increasing demands placed on the maternal cardiovascular and respiratory system.     

Differences between heart rate and blood pressure variability in schizophrenia.

Heart rate and blood pressure variability parameters were assessed to determine the risk of cardiac mortality in schizophrenia. We investigated 21 acute, unmedicated patients with paranoid schizophrenia and 21 matched controls. Cardiovascular parameters obtained included heart rate variability, blood pressure variability, cardiac output and left ventricular work index. All parameters investigated were analyzed using linear and non-linear techniques. These investigations revealed increased left ventricular work index and reduced heart rate variability. Furthermore, blood pressure was significantly higher compared to controls, whereas its variability was unchanged. We conclude that our results reflect autonomic cardiovascular dysregulation in acute schizophrenia.     

Heart rate variability biofeedback as a method for assessing baroreflex function: a preliminary study of resonance in the cardiovascular system

This study describes the use of a biofeedback method for the noninvasive study of baroreflex mechanisms. Five previously untrained healthy male participants learned to control oscillations in heart rate using biofeedback training to modify their heart rate variability at specific frequencies. They were instructed to match computer-generated sinusoidal oscillations with oscillations in heart rate at seven frequencies within the range of 0.01–0.14 Hz. All participants successfully produced high-amplitude target-frequency oscillations in both heart rate and blood pressure. Stable and predictable transfer functions between heart rate and blood pressure were obtained in all participants. The highest oscillation amplitudes were produced in the range of 0.055–0.11 Hz for heart rate and 0.02–0.055 Hz for blood pressure. Transfer functions were calculated among sinusoidal oscillations in the target stimuli, heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration for frequencies at which subjects received training. High and low target-frequency oscillation amplitudes at specific frequencies could be explained by resonance among various oscillatory processes in the cardiovascular system. The exact resonant frequencies differed among individuals. Changes in heart rate oscillations could not be completely explained by changes in breathing. The biofeedback method also allowed us to quantity characteristics of inertia, delay, and speed sensitivity in baroreflex system. We discuss the implications of these findings for using heart rate variability biofeedback as an aid in diagnosing various autonomic and cardiovascular system disorders and as a method for treating these disorders.     

Campodimele Study: Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Pattern in Clinically Healthy Elderly Subjects

Noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is a developing method in clinical practice. Its interpretation needs reference standards stratified by age and gender. This study addresses ambulatory BP monitoring in elderly people with the purpose of quantifying the discrete and periodic variability of BP pattern over a 24-h period. The ABPM was performed in 92 clinically healthy subjects (45 men and 47 women) ranging in age from 76 to 102 years. The results refer to the time-qualified mean values with their dispersion, to the circadian rhythm with its parameters, and to the daily baric impact (BI) with its variability. The conclusion is drawn that BP preserves its nychtohemeral variability and circadian rhythmicity despite old age. The daily BP mean level and BI in older people in good health are comparable with those of young subjects, suggesting that humans surviving into old age are characterized by a eugenic control of their pressure regimen.     

Campodimele Study: Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Pattern in Clinically Healthy Elderly Subjects

Noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is a developing method in clinical practice. Its interpretation needs reference standards stratified by age and gender. This study addresses ambulatory BP monitoring in elderly people with the purpose of quantifying the discrete and periodic variability of BP pattern over a 24-h period. The ABPM was performed in 92 clinically healthy subjects (45 men and 47 women) ranging in age from 76 to 102 years. The results refer to the time-qualified mean values with their dispersion, to the circadian rhythm with its parameters, and to the daily baric impact (BI) with its variability. The conclusion is drawn that BP preserves its nychtohemeral variability and circadian rhythmicity despite old age. The daily BP mean level and BI in older people in good health are comparable with those of young subjects, suggesting that humans surviving into old age are characterized by a eugenic control of their pressure regimen.     

Nonsymmetrical double logistic analysis of ambulatory blood pressure recordings.

We developed an asymmetric double logistic curve-fitting procedure for circadian analysis that can determine the rate of change in variables during the day-to-night separately from the night-to-day transition for use in animal studies. We now have applied this procedure to 24-h systolic (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and heart rate ambulatory recordings from 302 patients. In 292 cases, all parameters showed a pattern of higher day and lower night values. In men there was a similar rate of transition between day and night or from night to day for both SAP and DAP that lasted 3-4 h, indicating a symmetrical diurnal pattern. By contrast, women showed a faster rate of decrease in mean arterial pressure in the evening compared with men (P < 0.05) and therefore showed an asymmetric diurnal SAP pattern. For both men and women, there was a markedly greater rate of morning increase in heart rate compared with the rate of evening decrease (2.2- and 1.9-fold, respectively, P < 0.001). The logistic method provided a better fit than the square-wave or the cosinor method (P < 0.001) and more appropriately detected nondippers. We conclude that analysis of ambulatory recordings by a new logistic curve-fitting method reveals more rapid reductions in evening SAP in women than men but both have two- to threefold more rapid morning rates of tachycardia. The ability of the double logistic method to determine the diurnal blood pressure rates of change independently is key to determining new markers for cardiovascular risk.     

Multifrequency Infradian Variation of Blood Pressure During and After Human Pregnancy

We used a chronobiologic approach to explore the possibility that there may be -7-day (circaseptan) and -30-day (circatrigintan) components in blood pressure during a healthy human pregnancy, the amenorrhea of this status notwithstanding. The results were compared with those obtained from data longitudinally monitored on the same subject at a time when she was not pregnant. The woman under study used an ABPM-630 Colin (Komaki, Japan) device to monitor her blood pressures and heart rates at half to 1-h intervals, with few interruptions. During pregnancy, starting during the first gestational week, she monitored herself for 2 of each 6-day span for the entire duration of pregnancy (a total of 76 days of monitoring). Additionally, with a monitoring protocol similar to that during pregnancy, the subject used the same blood pressure monitor for a total of 78 days during 9.6 months and starting 1 year after delivery. The data obtained oscillometrically for both longitudinal profiles were analyzed separately by multiple-component linear least-squares rhythmometry, a procedure used to describe the periodic waveform of nonsinusoidal rhythms. The analysis of blood pressure variability during pregnancy allows the identification not only of the circadian (with a period of 24 h), but also of other statistically significant components with periods of 156 (6.5 days, apparently free-running from the social week) and of 720 h (30 days) for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. This multiharmonic time structure is somewhat different during menstruation in the same woman and during a similar time span, with statistically significant components of 96 h (4 days), 192 h (8 days), and 960 h (40 days) for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Moreover, the ratio between the amplitudes of the infradian components identified during pregnancy in clinical health is reversed from that obtained in women with preeclampsia. The complex time-structure of blood pressure during pregnancy offers new endpoints to be taken into account for an early identification of gestational hypertension or even preeclampsia.     

Circadian time-qualified tolerance intervals for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of hypertension

The large-amplitude circadian pattern in blood pressure of healthy subjects of both genders suggests that the constant threshold currently used to diagnose hypertension should be replaced by a time-specified reference limit reflecting the mostly predictable blood pressure variability during the 24 h. Accordingly, we derived circadian time-specified reference standards for blood pressure as a function of gender. We studied 743 normotensive Caucasian volunteers (400 men and 343 women), 45.7 ± 16.5 (mean ± SD) years of age. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring at 20-min intervals during the day and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours. Data from each blood pressure series were synchronized according to the rest-activity cycle of each individual in order to avoid differences among subjects in actual times of daily activity. Data were then used to compute 90% circadian tolerance intervals for each gender separately. The method, derived on the basis of bootstrap techniques, does not need to assume normality or symmetry in the data and, therefore, it is highly appropriate to describe the circadian pattern of blood pressure variability. Results reflect expected changes in the tolerance limits as a function of gender and circadian sampling time, as well as upper blood pressure limits below the thresholds currently used for diagnosing hypertension, especially for women. The use of these time-dependent tolerance limits for the computation of a hyperbaric index as a measure of blood pressure excess has already been shown to provide a reproducible and high-sensitivity test for the diagnosis of hypertension, which can also be used to evaluate treatment efficacy.     

Chronophysiology of the cardiovascular system

The development of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices and the beat-by-beat measurement of heart rate have enabled it to be established that there are circadian rhythms in heart rate and blood pressure in subjects living normally. Investigations of these variables have led to quantification of their fall at night, and rapid rise on awakening and becoming active in the morning. These changes are of particular interest insofar as abnormalities in them are associated with cardiovascular problems and morbidity in patients and also act as risk factors in otherwise healthy individuals. It has also been shown that there are many other variables of the cardiovascular system. The causes of the circadian rhythms in heart rate and blood pressure are outlined, with particular stress upon the role of the autonomic nervous system, as assessed from low- and high-frequency components of the variation in heart rate measured beat-by-beat. Activity increases blood pressure, but there is evidence that this “reactivity” varies with time of day, and this also might be related to cardiovascular morbidity. Based upon data from several sources, including night work, resting subjects and bed-ridden patients, it is concluded that the contribution of the “body clock” to producing the circadian rhythm in heart rate and blood pressure is relatively small. A bias towards an exogenous cause applies also to most other circadian rhythms in the cardiovascular system. Knowledge of circadian rhythmicity in cardiovascular system, together with an understanding of its causes, provides a rationale for advice to reduce cardiovascular risk and to assess the efficacy of therapies.     

Multifrequency Infradian Variation of Blood Pressure During and After Human Pregnancy

We used a chronobiologic approach to explore the possibility that there may be -7-day (circaseptan) and -30-day (circatrigintan) components in blood pressure during a healthy human pregnancy, the amenorrhea of this status notwithstanding. The results were compared with those obtained from data longitudinally monitored on the same subject at a time when she was not pregnant. The woman under study used an ABPM-630 Colin (Komaki, Japan) device to monitor her blood pressures and heart rates at half to 1-h intervals, with few interruptions. During pregnancy, starting during the first gestational week, she monitored herself for 2 of each 6-day span for the entire duration of pregnancy (a total of 76 days of monitoring). Additionally, with a monitoring protocol similar to that during pregnancy, the subject used the same blood pressure monitor for a total of 78 days during 9.6 months and starting 1 year after delivery. The data obtained oscillometrically for both longitudinal profiles were analyzed separately by multiple-component linear least-squares rhythmometry, a procedure used to describe the periodic waveform of nonsinusoidal rhythms. The analysis of blood pressure variability during pregnancy allows the identification not only of the circadian (with a period of 24 h), but also of other statistically significant components with periods of 156 (6.5 days, apparently free-running from the social week) and of 720 h (30 days) for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. This multiharmonic time structure is somewhat different during menstruation in the same woman and during a similar time span, with statistically significant components of 96 h (4 days), 192 h (8 days), and 960 h (40 days) for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Moreover, the ratio between the amplitudes of the infradian components identified during pregnancy in clinical health is reversed from that obtained in women with preeclampsia. The complex time-structure of blood pressure during pregnancy offers new endpoints to be taken into account for an early identification of gestational hypertension or even preeclampsia.     

Impairment of endothelial function in women with a history of preeclampsia: an indicator of cardiovascular risk

Preeclampsia is a disorder of pregnancy diagnosed by gestational hypertension and proteinuria. Epidemiological evidence suggests that women who experience preeclampsia are at a greater risk of hypertension and heart disease later in life compared with women who had normal pregnancies. Our objective was to determine whether endothelial function is impaired in postpartum women with a history of preeclampsia in their first pregnancy. We measured forearm blood flow (FBF) by venous occlusion plethysmography in 50 healthy women: 16 with prior preeclampsia, 14 with a prior normotensive pregnancy, and 20 never pregnant controls. The postpartum women participated 6-12 mo after delivery. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were concurrently monitored on the contralateral arm. Hemodynamic variables were assessed at baseline and during a mental stress test known to elicit endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. We found that baseline FBF, HR, systolic BP, and diastolic BP did not significantly differ among the groups, whereas mean arterial pressure in the preeclamptic group was greater than that of the normal pregnancy group (P = 0.03). Stress-induced FBF (percent change over baseline) was reduced in the preeclamptic group compared with both the normal pregnancy and never pregnant groups (P = 0.06) and was significantly attenuated compared with women with prior normal pregnancies (91% vs. 147%, P = 0.006). These data demonstrate that women with a history of preeclampsia exhibit impaired endothelial function up to 1 yr postpartum. This observation may explain their increased risk for hypertension and cardiovascular disease.     

Circadian Time-Qualified Tolerance Intervals for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Hypertension

The large-amplitude circadian pattern in blood pressure of healthy subjects of both genders suggests that the constant threshold currently used to diagnose hypertension should be replaced by a time-specified reference limit reflecting the mostly predictable blood pressure variability during the 24 h. Accordingly, we derived circadian time-specified reference standards for blood pressure as a function of gender. We studied 743 normotensive Caucasian volunteers (400 men and 343 women), 45.7 ± 16.5 (mean ± SD) years of age. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring at 20-min intervals during the day and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours. Data from each blood pressure series were synchronized according to the rest-activity cycle of each individual in order to avoid differences among subjects in actual times of daily activity. Data were then used to compute 90% circadian tolerance intervals for each gender separately. The method, derived on the basis of bootstrap techniques, does not need to assume normality or symmetry in the data and, therefore, it is highly appropriate to describe the circadian pattern of blood pressure variability. Results reflect expected changes in the tolerance limits as a function of gender and circadian sampling time, as well as upper blood pressure limits below the thresholds currently used for diagnosing hypertension, especially for women. The use of these time-dependent tolerance limits for the computation of a hyperbaric index as a measure of blood pressure excess has already been shown to provide a reproducible and high-sensitivity test for the diagnosis of hypertension, which can also be used to evaluate treatment efficacy.