Differential roles of RIPK1 and RIPK3 in TNF-induced necroptosis and chemotherapeutic agent-induced cell death

Apoptosis is a key mechanism for metazoans to eliminate unwanted cells. Resistance to apoptosis is a hallmark of many cancer cells and a major roadblock to traditional chemotherapy. Recent evidence indicates that inhibition of caspase-dependent apoptosis sensitizes many cancer cells to a form of non-apoptotic cell death termed necroptosis. This has led to widespread interest in exploring necroptosis as an alternative strategy for anti-cancer therapy. Here we show that in human colon cancer tissues, the expression of the essential necroptosis adaptors receptor interacting protein kinase (RIPK)1 and RIPK3 is significantly decreased compared with adjacent normal colon tissues. The expression of RIPK1 and RIPK3 was suppressed by hypoxia, but not by epigenetic DNA modification. To explore the role of necroptosis in chemotherapy-induced cell death, we used inhibitors of RIPK1 or RIPK3 kinase activity, and modulated their expression in colon cancer cell lines using short hairpin RNAs. We found that RIPK1 and RIPK3 were largely dispensable for classical chemotherapy-induced cell death. Caspase inhibitor and/or second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase mimetic, which sensitize cells to RIPK1- and RIPK3-dependent necroptosis downstream of tumor necrosis factor receptor-like death receptors, also did not alter the response of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. In contrast to the RIPKs, we found that cathepsins are partially responsible for doxorubicin or etoposide-induced cell death. Taken together, these results indicate that traditional chemotherapeutic agents are not efficient inducers of necroptosis and that more potent pathway-specific drugs are required to fully harness the power of necroptosis in anti-cancer therapy.Cell death by apoptosis is a natural barrier to cancer development, as it limits uncontrolled proliferation driven by oncogenes.¹ Chemotherapeutic agents that target apoptosis have been successful in anti-cancer therapy. However, cancer cells, especially cancer stem cells, often evolve multiple mechanisms to circumvent growth suppression by apoptosis.² This resistance to apoptosis is a major challenge for many chemotherapeutic agents. Targeting other non-apoptotic cell death pathways is an attractive therapeutic alternative.A growing number of recent studies show that there are distinct genetic programmed cell death modes other than apoptosis.³ Necroptosis is mediated by receptor interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3).⁴ In the presence of caspase inhibition and cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) depletion, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 1 triggers a signaling reaction that culminates in binding of RIPK3 with its upstream activator RIPK1 through the RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM).⁴ RIPK1 and RIPK3 phosphorylation stabilizes this complex and promotes its conversion to an amyloid-like filamentous structure termed the necrosome.⁵ Once activated, RIPK3 recruits its substrate mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL).⁶ Phosphorylated MLKL forms oligomers that translocate to intracellular membranes and the plasma membrane, which eventually leads to membrane rupture.^{7, 8, 9, 10}In addition to phosphorylation, RIPK1 and RIPK3 are also tightly regulated by ubiquitination, a process mediated by the E3 ligases cIAP1, cIAP2, and the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex.¹¹ The ubiquitin chains on RIPK1 act as a scaffold to activate nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways and inhibit formation of the necrosome. As such, depletion of cIAP1/2 by second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac) mimetics or removal of the ubiquitin chains by the de-ubiquitinating enzyme cylindromatosis (CYLD) promotes necroptosis.^{12, 13, 14, 15} In addition, RIPK1 and RIPK3 are cleaved and inactivated by caspase 8.^{16, 17, 18} Mice deficient for caspase 8 or FADD, an essential adaptor protein of caspase 8, suffer from embryonic lethality due to extensive RIPK1- or RIPK3-dependent necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21} Hence, caspase inhibition and IAP depletion are key priming signals for necroptosis.The physiological functions of RIPK1 and RIPK3 have been extensively investigated in infectious and sterile inflammatory diseases.^{4, 22} By contrast, their roles in cancer cells'' response to chemotherapeutics are poorly understood. Here we show that RIPK1 and RIPK3 expression is significantly decreased in human colon cancer tissues, suggesting that suppression of RIPK1 or RIPK3 expression is advantageous for cancer growth. However, the loss of RIPK1 and RIPK3 expression in colon cancer was not due to epigenetic DNA modification. Interestingly, RIPK1 and RIPK3 expression in colon cancer cells is reduced by hypoxia, a hallmark of solid tumor. We found that chemotherapeutic agents did not effectively elicit RIPK1/RIPK3-dependent necroptosis in colon cancer cells. Moreover, caspase inhibition and Smac mimetics, which are potent sensitizers for necroptosis, also did not enhance chemotherapeutic agent-induced cell death. These results show that traditional chemotherapeutic agents are not strong inducers of classical necroptosis in colon cancers and suggest that development of pathway-specific drugs is needed to harness the power of necroptosis in anti-cancer therapy.     

Absence of RIPK3 predicts necroptosis resistance in malignant melanoma

Acquired or intrinsic resistance to apoptotic and necroptotic stimuli is considered a major hindrance of therapeutic success in malignant melanoma. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) are important regulators of apoptotic and necroptotic cell death mediated by numerous cell death signalling platforms. In this report we investigated the impact of IAPs for cell death regulation in malignant melanoma. Suppression of IAPs strongly sensitized a panel of melanoma cells to death ligand-induced cell death, which, surprisingly, was largely mediated by apoptosis, as it was completely rescued by addition of caspase inhibitors. Interestingly, the absence of necroptosis signalling correlated with a lack of receptor-interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3) mRNA and protein expression in all cell lines, whereas primary melanocytes and cultured nevus cells strongly expressed RIPK3. Reconstitution of RIPK3, but not a RIPK3-kinase dead mutant in a set of melanoma cell lines overcame CD95L/IAP antagonist-induced necroptosis resistance independent of autocrine tumour necrosis factor secretion. Using specific inhibitors, functional studies revealed that RIPK3-mediated mixed-lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) phosphorylation and necroptosis induction critically required receptor-interacting protein kinase-1 signalling. Furthermore, the inhibitor of mutant BRAF Dabrafenib, but not Vemurafenib, inhibited necroptosis in melanoma cells whenever RIPK3 is present. Our data suggest that loss of RIPK3 in melanoma and selective inhibition of the RIPK3/MLKL axis by BRAF inhibitor Dabrafenib, but not Vemurafenib, is critical to protect from necroptosis. Strategies that allow RIPK3 expression may allow unmasking the necroptotic signalling machinery in melanoma and points to reactivation of this pathway as a treatment option for metastatic melanoma.Over the past few years, necroptosis has been established as an alternative programmed form of cell death, contrasting caspase-dependent apoptosis. It is now evident that an ordered activation of the receptor-interacting protein kinases-1 and -3 (RIPK1 and RIPK3), and their downstream substrates is mandatory for the execution of necroptosis.^{1, 2, 3} Under caspase-limited conditions, the necroptotic cell signalling machinery is regulated by RIPK1, with the impact of scaffolding function as compared with kinase function still unclear.^{1, 4, 5, 6} RIPK1 interacts with and either autophosphorylates or transphosphorylates RIPK3 (for review, see Cho et al.,¹ Zhang et al.,² He et al.,³ and Vanden Berghe et al.⁷). When RIPK1 is active, RIPK3 phosphorylation and activation occurs within the assembled Necrosome (for review, see Remijsen et al.⁸) or Ripoptosome.^{4, 9, 10} RIPK3 then phosphorylates the pseudo kinase mixed-lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL).¹¹ MLKL in its active form allows its oligomerization, membrane accumulation, and complex formation within cellular membranes of the mitochondria¹² and cell membranes,¹³ and finally results in necroptosis.¹⁴The RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL signalling network acts as a sensor for genotoxic stress⁹ and also has a key role in necroptosis regulation in keratinocyte skin cancer (SCC).⁴ In these epithelial cancers, cellular inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) block both apoptotic and necroptotic cell death.^{4, 5} Both apoptosis and necroptosis can be increasingly initiated by intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli when IAPs are suppressed by IAP antagonist. Extrinsic apoptosis mediated by activation of death receptors (DRs) such as cluster of differentiation 95 (CD95), TRAILR1/R2 or tumour necrosis factor receptor-1 (TNFR1) through ligation of respective death ligands (DLs) such as CD95L, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), and TNF initiates apoptosis either by direct activation of the caspase cascade (caspase-8/caspase-3) or via the intrinsic cell death signalling machinery regulated by pro-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family followed by caspase-3 activation.¹⁵ Inhibition of caspase-8 within the death-inducing signalling complex or complex II, or within the Ripoptosome can trigger CD95L-mediated,⁵ TRAIL-mediated¹⁶ or TNF-induced necroptosis.^{8, 17} A role for apoptosis resistance, cancer maintenance, and progression is widely assumed (for review, see Obexer et al.¹⁸), but the pathophysiological inhibitory or propagating function of necroptosis has not formally been demonstrated in cancer.Metastatic melanoma has an overall poor prognosis but novel therapeutics have revolutionized clinical practice for different subsets of patients. The use of inhibitors of the V600E- or V600K-mutated proto-oncogene serine/threonine protein kinase B-RAF (e.g., Dabrafenib or Vemurafenib) results in suppression of Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways and translate into unfortunately transient clinical responses (for review, see Spagnolo et al.¹⁹). The high recrudescence of metastatic melanoma following the treatment with BRAF inhibitors will potentially require combination therapies that activate additional tumour-inhibitory pathways. Combinations such as BRAF inhibitors with mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors have already yielded impressive results²⁰ and other combination therapies may further improve clinical outcome.²¹ As BRAF inhibitors target the cell death pathway at best in an indirect manner, we reasoned that necroptosis induction could represent a novel option to improve melanoma therapy. Our investigations demonstrate for the first time that loss of RIPK3 during melanoma development is critical for necroptosis protection. Reactivation of the RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL signalling machinery by RIPK3 reconstitution allows IAP antagonist/DL-mediated necroptosis in the presence of Vemurafenib, but not Dabrafenib. Here, Dabrafenib blocks necroptosis by interference with RIPK3-mediated MLKL phosphorylation. Therefore, strategies that increase RIPK3 expression in combination with Vemurafenib, but not Dabrafenib, likely represent an attractive strategy to overcome cell death resistance in melanoma.     

Necroptosis is preceded by nuclear translocation of the signaling proteins that induce it

A signaling pathway that induces programmed necrotic cell death (necroptosis) was reported to be activated in cells by several cytokines and various pathogen components. The major proteins participating in that pathway are the protein kinases RIPK1 and RIPK3 and the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL). Recent studies have suggested that MLKL, once activated, mediates necroptosis by binding to cellular membranes, thereby triggering ion fluxes. However, our knowledge of both the sequence of molecular events leading to MLKL activation and the subcellular sites of these events is fragmentary. Here we report that the association of MLKL with the cell membrane in necroptotic death is preceded by the translocation of phosphorylated MLKL, along with RIPK1 and RIPK3, to the nucleus.Apart from the apoptotic cell death pathway that ligands of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family can activate, these ligands and various other inducers, including the interferons and various pathogen components, have in recent years been found also to trigger a signaling cascade that induces programmed necrotic death (necroptosis). This cascade encompasses sequential activation of the protein kinases RIPK1 and RIPK3 and the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL).^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5} RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation of MLKL triggers its oligomerization, which is necessary and sufficient for the induction of cell death,^{6, 7, 8} and can also trigger some non-deadly functions.⁹ MLKL was recently suggested to trigger cell death by binding to cellular membranes and initiating ion fluxes through them.^{6, 7, 8, 10} However, its exact molecular target in death induction is contentious.^{6, 8, 10, 11, 12} Current knowledge of the subcellular sites of MLKL action is based mainly on determination of the location of this protein close to the time of cell death. Here we present a detailed assessment of the cellular location of MLKL at different times following its activation. Our findings indicate that before cell death, MLKL translocates to the nucleus along with RIPK1 and RIPK3.     

RIPK1- and RIPK3-induced cell death mode is determined by target availability

Both receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3 can signal cell death following death receptor ligation. To study the requirements for RIPK-triggered cell death in the absence of death receptor signaling, we engineered inducible versions of RIPK1 and RIPK3 that can be activated by dimerization with the antibiotic coumermycin. In the absence of TNF or other death ligands, expression and dimerization of RIPK1 was sufficient to cause cell death by caspase- or RIPK3-dependent mechanisms. Dimerized RIPK3 induced cell death by an MLKL-dependent mechanism but, surprisingly, also induced death mediated by FADD, caspase 8 and RIPK1. Catalytically active RIPK3 kinase domains were essential for MLKL-dependent but not for caspase 8-dependent death. When RIPK1 or RIPK3 proteins were dimerized, the mode of cell death was determined by the availability of downstream molecules such as FADD, caspase 8 and MLKL. These observations imply that rather than a ‘switch'' operating between the two modes of cell death, the final mechanism depends on levels of the respective signaling and effector proteins.Mammalian cells can use a number of mechanisms to kill themselves. The best characterized depends on the Bcl-2 family members Bax and Bak that work via mitochondria to activate caspases.¹ Some caspases, notably caspase 8, can be activated independently of Bcl-2 family members, for example, after stimulation of members of the TNF receptor superfamily.² Recently, it has become apparent that some of these receptors, including TNFR1, can activate a third suicide mechanism that does not require caspases, and in which the morphology of the dying cell differs from classical apoptosis. This form of cell death, termed ‘necroptosis'', can often be blocked by necrostatin-1 (nec-1), an inhibitor of the kinase activity of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1).^{3, 4} Accordingly, observations from several groups have shown that in some cell types, expression of RIPK1 can signal cell death by caspase-independent necroptosis.⁵It has previously been revealed that RIPK1 could function downstream of death receptors, but in those cases, cell death was usually blocked by coexpression of the viral inhibitor of caspases 1 and 8, CrmA,⁶ and typically exhibited a classical ‘apoptotic'' morphology. It was revealed that RIPK1 engages FADD via homotypic binding of their death domains (DDs), and FADD in turn activates caspase 8.^{6, 7}RIPK3, like RIPK1, bears a kinase domain and RIP homology interaction motif (RHIM), but unlike RIPK1 does not have a DD.^{8, 9, 10, 11} RIPK3 is required for necroptosis.^{12, 13} Furthermore, RIPK1 appears to activate RIPK3 in this pathway, as cell death could be blocked by nec-1.¹⁴ RIPK3 activates, by phosphorylation, MLKL, a pseudokinase essential for this death pathway.^{15, 16, 17} Once activated, MLKL forms multimers that trigger breaches of the plasma membrane.^{18, 19, 20}Although RIPK3 is necessary for necroptosis, it is unclear whether activation of RIPK3 is sufficient for cell death, because TNF activates signaling by many pathways in addition to those controlled by RIPK1.²¹ It is also unclear whether RIPK3 can contribute to apoptosis. Despite some reports to this effect,^{8, 9, 22} RIPK3 has been described as the necroptotic ‘switch'', implying its activity precipitates necroptosis to the exclusion of apoptosis.^{23, 24, 25}Here, we have directly activated RIP kinases without the confounding effects of multiple signals emanating from the target cell''s cytokine receptors, allowing us to define more precisely the functions of RIPK1 and RIPK3. We activated RIP kinases by dimerization using inducible lentiviral vectors, each encoding a chimera of a RIP kinase with subunit B of E. coli DNA gyrase.²⁶ We infected mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) that lack genes for, or expression of, various cell death proteins, induced expression of the RIPK chimera, caused its dimerization by addition of the divalent antibiotic coumermycin (C) and quantitated the resulting cell death.Our results reveal that each of RIPK1 and RIPK3 can contribute to both apoptosis and necroptosis depending on the biochemical context. Furthermore, necroptosis can occur in the absence of caspase 8 and FADD, which shows that the ripoptosome, with core components caspase 8, FADD and RIPK1,^{27, 28} is not required for necroptosis. Instead, we propose that dimers of RIPK1 and/or RIPK3 are the pivotal complexes from which both forms of cell death can progress.     

Characterization of RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation of the activation loop of MLKL during necroptosis

Mixed lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL) mediates necroptosis by translocating to the plasma membrane and inducing its rupture. The activation of MLKL occurs in a multimolecular complex (the ‘necrosome''), which is comprised of MLKL, receptor-interacting serine/threonine kinase (RIPK)-3 (RIPK3) and, in some cases, RIPK1. Within this complex, RIPK3 phosphorylates the activation loop of MLKL, promoting conformational changes and allowing the formation of MLKL oligomers, which migrate to the plasma membrane. Previous studies suggested that RIPK3 could phosphorylate the murine MLKL activation loop at Ser345, Ser347 and Thr349. Moreover, substitution of the Ser345 for an aspartic acid creates a constitutively active MLKL, independent of RIPK3 function. Here we examine the role of each of these residues and found that the phosphorylation of Ser345 is critical for RIPK3-mediated necroptosis, Ser347 has a minor accessory role and Thr349 seems to be irrelevant. We generated a specific monoclonal antibody to detect phospho-Ser345 in murine cells. Using this antibody, a series of MLKL mutants and a novel RIPK3 inhibitor, we demonstrate that the phosphorylation of Ser345 is not required for the interaction between RIPK3 and MLKL in the necrosome, but is essential for MLKL translocation, accumulation in the plasma membrane, and consequent necroptosis.Regulated necrotic cell death, or ‘necroptosis,'' is mediated by the interaction of activated receptor-interacting kinase-3 (RIPK3) and mixed lineage kinase like (MLKL).^{1, 2, 3} The function of RIPK3 to promote necroptosis can be induced by the activity of receptor-interacting protein kinase-1 (RIPK1),⁴ and is antagonized by the proteolytic activity of a complex formed by RIPK1, FADD, caspase-8 and c-FLIP_L.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10} Inactive RIPK1 functions to inhibit RIPK3 activation, even under conditions in which RIPK3 is activated independently of RIPK1.^{11, 12, 13} These complex interactions help to account for the lethal effects of ablating FADD, caspase-8 or RIPK1.¹⁴MLKL is a substrate for RIPK3 kinase activity^{1, 2, 3} and appears to execute the process of necroptosis by targeting the plasma membrane.^{15, 16, 17} The phosphorylation of MLKL by RIPK3 has been proposed to promote necroptosis by inducing essential changes in the ‘latch'' of this pseudokinase, allowing the formation of oligomers, migration to plasma membrane^{15, 16, 17, 18} and binding to phosphatidylinositol lipids to directly disrupt membrane integrity.^{16, 19} Structurally, murine MLKL is composed of a pseudokinase domain (C-terminal region) and a four-helical bundle domain (4HBD) located in the N-terminal region.^{3, 20} The 4HBD domain is sufficient to oligomerize, bind to phosphatidylinositol lipids and trigger cell death.^{16, 19} However, the activation of full-length MLKL requires phosphorylation of residues in the activation loop in the pseudokinase domain. The residues Ser345, Ser347 and Thr349 within the murine MLKL activation loop are RIPK3 phosphorylation sites,³ corresponding to Thr357 and Ser358 in human MLKL.¹⁶ Upon RIPK3 phosphorylation, human MLKL shifts from its monomeric state to an active oligomeric state.¹⁶The residue Gln343 in the murine α-helix (residues Leu339 to Ser347) forms a hydrogen bond with Lys219 and the Ser345 and disruption of this coordinated state by phosphorylation of Ser345 has been proposed to destabilize the monomeric structure, promoting a conformational change in MLKL to an active state.^{3, 21} This hypothesis was supported by the specific mutations K219M, Q343A or S345D; all of which led to a form of MLKL form that promoted necroptosis independently of RIPK3.^{3, 16}In this study, we examine serine and threonine residues within the activation loop of MLKL for their roles in necroptosis. We have developed an antibody anti-phospho-Ser345 and explore its use as a marker for necroptosis in murine cell systems. Using this antibody, together with described and novel inhibitors of RIPK3, we more fully explore the role of modifications in the active loop of MLKL during the process of necroptosis.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

HSP90 activity is required for MLKL oligomerisation and membrane translocation and the induction of necroptotic cell death

Necroptosis is a caspase-independent form of regulated cell death that has been implicated in the development of a range of inflammatory, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases. The pseudokinase, Mixed Lineage Kinase Domain-Like (MLKL), is the most terminal known obligatory effector in the necroptosis pathway, and is activated following phosphorylation by Receptor Interacting Protein Kinase-3 (RIPK3). Activated MLKL translocates to membranes, leading to membrane destabilisation and subsequent cell death. However, the molecular interactions governing the processes downstream of RIPK3 activation remain poorly defined. Using a phenotypic screen, we identified seven heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors that inhibited necroptosis in both wild-type fibroblasts and fibroblasts expressing an activated mutant of MLKL. We observed a modest reduction in MLKL protein levels in human and murine cells following HSP90 inhibition, which was only apparent after 15 h of treatment. The delayed reduction in MLKL protein abundance was unlikely to completely account for defective necroptosis, and, consistent with this, we also found inhibition of HSP90 blocked membrane translocation of activated MLKL. Together, these findings implicate HSP90 as a modulator of necroptosis at the level of MLKL, a function that complements HSP90''s previously demonstrated modulation of the upstream necroptosis effector kinases, RIPK1 and RIPK3.Necroptosis is an inflammatory, caspase-independent form of regulated cell death characterised by loss of cellular membrane integrity and release of cytoplasmic contents.¹ It is believed to have evolved as a defence mechanism against viruses;^{2, 3} however, there is increasing evidence that deregulated necroptosis has a role in the pathogenesis of a range of inflammatory, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases.^{4, 5, 6, 7, 8} Reduced capacity to undergo necroptosis has been correlated to increased aggressiveness of cancers;^{9, 10} and therapeutic initiation of necroptosis is currently being investigated as a cancer therapy.^{11, 12} Additionally, there is emerging evidence that the necroptotic signalling pathway has a general role in the modulation of inflammation.^{13, 14, 15, 16, 17} As such, unravelling the molecular events governing necroptosis, and potential avenues for therapeutic intervention, is of enormous interest.Necroptosis is initiated through activation of death receptors, such as Tumour Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 (TNFR1), or through microbial activation of pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors or intracellular viral DNA sensors.^{3, 18, 19, 20} Receptor ligation initiates a signalling cascade, whereby Receptor Interacting Protein Kinase (RIPK)-3 oligomerises and is phosphorylated, a process known to be regulated by association with other effectors, such as the protein kinase RIPK1, TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing IFN-β (TRIF), or DNA-dependent activator of IFN regulatory factors (DAI), via their RIP Homotypic Interaction Motifs (RHIMs).^{2, 21, 22} Once activated, RIPK3 phosphorylates the pseudokinase domain of Mixed Lineage Kinase domain-Like (MLKL), the most downstream known obligate effector of the necroptotic signalling pathway, to induce its activation.^{23, 24} MLKL phosphorylation is thought to trigger a molecular switch,^{25, 26, 27} leading to the unleashing of the N-terminal executioner four-helix bundle (4HB) domain,²⁸ MLKL oligomerisation and translocation to cellular membranes where cell death occurs via an incompletely-understood mechanism.^{28, 29, 30}Molecular chaperones have an integral role in modulating both the structure and function of proteins. One such chaperone is heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90), which interacts with a diverse group of protein ‘clients'', the largest group comprising the kinases and pseudokinases, with 50% of the human kinome estimated to interact with HSP90.³¹ These interactions are dependent on the recognition of the kinase or pseudokinase domain by the HSP90 co-chaperone Cdc37, which enables HSP90 to confer protein stabilisation, assist in late-stage folding and conformational modifications, and mediate intracellular transport.^{32, 33, 34, 35}It has already been demonstrated that the necroptotic pathway is subject to modulation by HSP90. RIPK1 is well established as an HSP90 client protein, with a number of studies finding HSP90 inhibition affects both the stability and function of RIPK1 and promotes an apoptotic phenotype.^{36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41} More recently, RIPK3 was also identified as an HSP90 client.^{2, 42, 43} Surprisingly, HSP90 inhibition did not markedly impact RIPK3 abundance or stability, but rather was essential for RIPK3''s necroptotic functions, such as phosphorylation of MLKL.⁴² However, whether MLKL itself is a client of HSP90 has not been investigated.In this study, using a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of MLKL-driven cell death, we identified HSP90 as a modulator of necroptosis that functions on, or downstream of, the terminal effector, MLKL. HSP90 inhibition did not markedly reduce levels of MLKL in human U937 or mouse dermal fibroblasts, suggesting instead that HSP90 has an active role in governing MLKL-mediated cell death. This idea is supported by our finding that cell death driven by the S345D activated mutant of MLKL in Ripk3-deficient fibroblasts in the absence of necroptotic stimuli was suppressed by three distinct chemical classes of HSP90 inhibitor, but MLKL abundance was not impacted by HSP90 inhibition. Although our data indicate that MLKL binds HSP90 weakly or transiently, HSP90 activity was essential for the assembly of MLKL into high molecular weight complexes and the membrane translocation known to precede cell death. These findings suggest an expanded role for HSP90 in regulating necroptosis, and further our understanding of the mechanisms controlling MLKL-mediated cell death.     

Distinct roles of RIP1–RIP3 hetero- and RIP3–RIP3 homo-interaction in mediating necroptosis

Necroptosis is mediated by a signaling complex called necrosome, containing receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1, RIP3, and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). It is known that RIP1 and RIP3 form heterodimeric filamentous scaffold in necrosomes through their RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) domain-mediated oligomerization, but the signaling events based on this scaffold has not been fully addressed. By using inducible dimer systems we found that RIP1–RIP1 interaction is dispensable for necroptosis; RIP1–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis signaling, but there is no necroptosis if no additional RIP3 protein is recruited to the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer, and the interaction with RIP1 promotes the RIP3 to recruit other RIP3; RIP3–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis and RIP3–RIP3 dimerization is sufficient to induce necroptosis; and RIP3 dimer-induced necroptosis requires MLKL. We further show that RIP3 oligomer is not more potent than RIP3 dimer in triggering necroptosis, suggesting that RIP3 homo-interaction in the complex, rather than whether RIP3 has formed homo polymer, is important for necroptosis. RIP3 dimerization leads to RIP3 intramolecule autophosphorylation, which is required for the recruitment of MLKL. Interestingly, phosphorylation of one of RIP3 in the dimer is sufficient to induce necroptosis. As RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer itself cannot induce necroptosis, the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid fibril is unlikely to directly propagate necroptosis. We propose that the signaling events after the RIP1–RIP3 amyloid complex assembly are the recruitment of free RIP3 by the RIP3 in the amyloid scaffold followed by autophosphorylation of RIP3 and subsequent recruitment of MLKL by RIP3 to execute necroptosis.Necroptosis is a type of programmed necrosis characterized by necrotic morphological changes, including cellular organelle swelling, cell membrane rupture,^{1, 2, 3} and dependence of receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1⁴ and RIP3.^{5, 6, 7} Physiological function of necroptosis has been illustrated in host defense,^{8, 9, 10, 11} inflammation,^{12, 13, 14, 15, 16} tissue injury,^{10, 17, 18} and development.^{19, 20, 21}Necroptosis can be induced by a number of different extracellular stimuli such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF). TNF stimulation leads to formation of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) signaling complex (named complex I), and complex II containing RIP1, TRADD, FAS-associated protein with a death domain (FADD), and caspase-8, of which the activation initiates apoptosis. If cells have high level of RIP3, RIP1 recruits RIP3 to form necrosome containing FADD,^{22, 23, 24} caspase-8, RIP1, and RIP3, and the cells undergo necroptosis.^{25, 26} Caspase-8 and FADD negatively regulates necroptosis,^{27, 28, 29, 30} because RIP1, RIP3, and CYLD are potential substrates of caspase-8.^{31, 32, 33, 34} Necrosome also suppresses apoptosis but the underlying mechanism has not been described yet. Mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) is downstream of RIP3,^{35, 36} and phosphorylation of MLKL is required for necroptosis.^{37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42}Apoptosis inducing complex (complex II) and necrosome are both supramolecular complexes.^{43, 44, 45} A recent study showed that RIP1 and RIP3 form amyloidal fibrils through their RIP homotypic interaction motif⁴⁶ (RHIM)-mediated polymerization, and suggested that amyloidal structure is essential for necroptosis signaling.⁴⁷ The RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex is believed to function as a scaffold that brings signaling proteins into proximity to permit their activation. However, RIP1 and RIP3 also can each form fibrils on their own RHIM domains in vitro. It is unclear how the homo- and hetero-interactions are coordinated and organized on the amyloid scaffold to execute their functions in necroptosis. Here, we used inducible dimerization systems to study the roles of RIP1–RIP1, RIP1–RIP3, and RIP3–RIP3 interactions in necroptosis signaling. Our data suggested that it is the RIP1–RIP3 interaction in the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex that empowers to recruit other free RIP3; homodimerization of RIP3 triggers its autophosphorylation and only the phosphorylated RIP3 can recruit MLKL to execute necroptosis.     

Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: a possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction

Neuropeptides induce signal transduction across the plasma membrane by acting through cell-surface receptors. The dynorphins, endogenous ligands for opioid receptors, are an exception; they also produce non-receptor-mediated effects causing pain and neurodegeneration. To understand non-receptor mechanism(s), we examined interactions of dynorphins with plasma membrane. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp electrophysiology, we demonstrate that dynorphins accumulate in the membrane and induce a continuum of transient increases in ionic conductance. This phenomenon is consistent with stochastic formation of giant (~2.7 nm estimated diameter) unstructured non-ion-selective membrane pores. The potency of dynorphins to porate the plasma membrane correlates with their pathogenic effects in cellular and animal models. Membrane poration by dynorphins may represent a mechanism of pathological signal transduction. Persistent neuronal excitation by this mechanism may lead to profound neuropathological alterations, including neurodegeneration and cell death.Neuropeptides are the largest and most diverse family of neurotransmitters. They are released from axon terminals and dendrites, diffuse to pre- or postsynaptic neuronal structures and activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors. Prodynorphin (PDYN)-derived opioid peptides including dynorphin A (Dyn A), dynorphin B (Dyn B) and big dynorphin (Big Dyn) consisting of Dyn A and Dyn B are endogenous ligands for the κ-opioid receptor. Acting through this receptor, dynorphins regulate processing of pain and emotions, memory acquisition and modulate reward induced by addictive substances.^{1, 2, 3, 4} Furthermore, dynorphins may produce robust cellular and behavioral effects that are not mediated through opioid receptors.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} As evident from pharmacological, morphological, genetic and human neuropathological studies, these effects are generally pathological, including cell death, neurodegeneration, neurological dysfunctions and chronic pain. Big Dyn is the most active pathogenic peptide, which is about 10- to 100-fold more potent than Dyn A, whereas Dyn B does not produce non-opioid effects.^{16, 17, 22, 25} Big Dyn enhances activity of acid-sensing ion channel-1a (ASIC1a) and potentiates ASIC1a-mediated cell death in nanomolar concentrations^{30, 31} and, when administered intrathecally, induces characteristic nociceptive behavior at femtomolar doses.^{17, 22} Inhibition of endogenous Big Dyn degradation results in pathological pain, whereas prodynorphin (Pdyn) knockout mice do not maintain neuropathic pain.^{22, 32} Big Dyn differs from its constituents Dyn A and Dyn B in its unique pattern of non-opioid memory-enhancing, locomotor- and anxiolytic-like effects.²⁵Pathological role of dynorphins is emphasized by the identification of PDYN missense mutations that cause profound neurodegeneration in the human brain underlying the SCA23 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 23), a very rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder.^{27, 33} Most PDYN mutations are located in the Big Dyn domain, demonstrating its critical role in neurodegeneration. PDYN mutations result in marked elevation in dynorphin levels and increase in its pathogenic non-opioid activity.^{27, 34} Dominant-negative pathogenic effects of dynorphins are not produced through opioid receptors.ASIC1a, glutamate NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)/kainate ion channels, and melanocortin and bradykinin B2 receptors have all been implicated as non-opioid dynorphin targets.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36} Multiplicity of these targets and their association with the cellular membrane suggest that their activation is a secondary event triggered by a primary interaction of dynorphins with the membrane. Dynorphins are among the most basic neuropeptides.^{37, 38} The basic nature is also a general property of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) and amyloid peptides that act by inducing membrane perturbations, altering membrane curvature and causing pore formation that disrupts membrane-associated processes including ion fluxes across the membrane.³⁹ The similarity between dynorphins and these two peptide groups in overall charge and size suggests a similar mode of their interactions with membranes.In this study, we dissect the interactions of dynorphins with the cell membrane, the primary event in their non-receptor actions. Using fluorescence imaging, correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp techniques, we demonstrate that dynorphin peptides accumulate in the plasma membrane in live cells and cause a profound transient increase in cell membrane conductance. Membrane poration by endogenous neuropeptides may represent a novel mechanism of signal transduction in the brain. This mechanism may underlie effects of dynorphins under pathological conditions including chronic pain and tissue injury.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.