Isolation of dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary Dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation have been isolated by using a strongly variegated line carrying the w ^m4 chromosome (w ^m4h) and the dominant enhancer mutant En(var)c ¹⁰¹. The use of an effective genetic test system made it possible to isolate more than 100 strongly dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation. This suggests that the phenomenon of position-effect variegation is characterised by a complex genetic basis. The significance of the isolated mutants to genetic dissection of structural and regulatory functions of the eukaryotic chromosome is discussed.     

Mutants affecting position-effect heterochromatinization in Drosophila melanogaster

The dominant suppressor Su(var)b ¹⁰¹ and the dominant enhancer En(var)c ¹⁰¹ were found to affect significantly white variegation in a strongly variegating line of the w ^m4 chromosome (w ^m4h ) which has been used as standard rearrangement for a genetic dissection of position-effect variegation (Reuter and Wolff, 1981). Both mutations were also shown to affect position-effect heterochromatisation in T(1;4)w ^m258-21 and variegation in all the rearrangements tested (white, brown, scute and bobbed variegation). These results suggest that the genes identified encode functions essential for the manifestation of gene inactivation in position-effect rearrangements. It seems also reasonable to assume that in all the rearrangements tested identical heterochromatisation processes lead to inactivation of the genes whose phenotype is variegated.     

The genetics of position-effect variegation modifying loci in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary The dose dependent effects of position-effect variegation (PEV) modifying genes were studied in chromosome arms2L, 2R and3R. Four groups of PEV modifying genes can be distinguished: haplo-abnormal suppressor and enhancer loci with or without a triplo-effect. using duplications four triplo-abnormal suppressor and four triplo-abnormal enhancer functions were localized. In two cases we proved that these functions correspond to a converse haplo-abnormal one. Altogether 43 modifier loci were identified. Most of these loci proved not to display significant triplo-effects (35). The group of haplo-abnormal loci with a triplo-effect may represent genes which play an important role in heterochromatin packaging.     

Position Effects and Variegation Enhancers in an Autosomal Region of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

A dominant eye color mutation was found associated with a third chromosome inversion broken distally at or near the karmoisin (kar) locus in 87C and proximally within centric heterochromatin. Suppressibility of the mutant phenotype by an extra Y chromosome indicated that this was an example of dominant position-effect variegation. When heterozygous with deficiencies uncovering the kar locus, this inversion chromosome was found to be lethal unless a region in 87EF was also deleted. Extra Y chromosomes rescued inversion/deletion heterozygotes, while removal of the Y chromosome from heterozygous males deficient for the region in 87EF was lethal. Thus, a variegating lethal lies near the breakpoint in 87C, and a wild-type gene that enhances its variegation lies in 87EF. Furthermore, deletion of the region in 87EF was found to strongly suppress white-mottled-4 (w^m4) variegation, while deletion of another region in 87BC suppressed less strongly. These results indicate that essential genes on autosomes are sensitive to position effects, and loci that enhance variegation, as defined by deficiency mapping, are very common.     

Functional properties of the heterochromatic sequences inducing w m4 position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

In position-effect variegation euchromatic genes are brought into the vicinity of heterochromatic sequences as a result of chromosomal rearrangements. This results in the inactivation of these genes in a proportion of cells causing a variegated phenotype. Tartof et al. (1984) have shown that the flanking heterochromatin in the w ^m4 variegating rearrangement in Drosophila melanogaster is homologous to the Type I inserts found in some portions of the rDNA repeats. We have studied the functional properties of these sequences using 51 revertant chromosomes, several variant lines of w ^m4 , strong enhancer mutations of position-effect variegation and X heterochromatin deletions. Our results suggest an array of tandemly repeated sequences showing additive effects and probably subject to magnification and reduction in number. Since only 3 of the 51 revertants isolated do not show variegation if strong enhancer mutations are introduced, only a very short sequence must be essential for the induction of white gene inactivation in w ^m4 . This suggests that the heterochromatic junction itself is sufficient to initiate the variegation of an adjacent gene. Parental source as well as paternal effects on the activity of these sequences have been detected. Revertant chromosomes of w ^m4 can be found after P-directed mutagenesis in hybrid dysgenic crosses suggesting mobile genetic elements at the breakpoints of inversion w ^m4 . These results are discussed with respect to the structural basis of positioneffect variegation as well as the function of certain heterochromatic sequences.     

The effects of two mutations connected with chromatin functions on female germ-line cells of Drosophila

Summary We have studied the developmental effects of two dominant suppressor mutations of position-effect variegation mutations on female germ-line cells. Su-var (2) 1⁰¹, which has been shown to affect chromatin structure though altering histone deacetylation, and Su-var (3) 3⁰³are recessive female steriles and zygotic lethals in the presence of butyrate or an additional Y chromosome. We have analysed mosaic females with mutant germ-line and normal soma and concluded that intact functions of the Su-var (2) 1 and the Su-var (3) 3 genes are required for development of both the soma and the germ-line and that as indirect evidence suggest, their maternally provided products are needed for normal embryonic development. It is suggested that there is possibly a common control of chromatin structure and gene expression in the soma, female germ-line and embryonic cells of Drosophila.     

A marked ring-Y-chromosome in Drosophila hydei with a new type of white variegation

A ring-Y chromosome, R(Y)w ^m, of D. hydei is described which carries a complete set of fertility genes, a NOR region and a small X-chromosomal insertion (w ^m), which may be used as a marker. The ring has been characterized by various staining techniques. It was derived from a w ^mCo Y chromosome by X-ray treatment of spermatocytes. Its mode of origin allows to fix the gene order in the distal region of the long arm of the w ^mCoY chromosome. The white ⁺ gene included in the ring shows a new type of position-effect variegation which is described and discussed in the context of an earlier hypothesis on a dual function of the white locus.     

Butyrate sensitive suppressor of position-effect variegation mutations in drosophila melanogaster

Summary Mutations at a locus on chromosome II of D. melanogaster suppressing position-effect variegation mutations have been identified which display recessive butyrate sensitivity. Survival of homozygous mutant flies is significantly reduced on medium containing sodium n-butyrate. The butyrate sensitive suppressor mutations are further characterized by recessive female sterility and reduced survival of homozygotes. Complementation analysis showed their allelism. The locus of these mutations, Su-var (2) 1, has been localized to 40.5±0.2 and, by using interstitial duplications, to region 31CD on the cytogenetic map. Moreover, the mutant alleles of the Su-var (2) 1 locus display a lethal interaction with the heterochromatic Y chromosome. The presence or absence of a Y chromosome in males or females has a strong influence on the viability of homozygous or transheterozygous suppressor flies. All the genetic properties of Su-var (2) 1 mutants suggest strongly that this locus affects chromosome condensation.     

Characterization of mutations that enhance position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary Several mutants that enhance the gene inactivation associated with position-effect variegation [E(var) mutants] have been characterized. These include three ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-induced lesions and a second chromosome duplication. Each of the EMS mutations maps to a discrete euchromatic site on the third chromosome. One is located within the chromosomal region occupied by a cluster of Su(var) mutations. All four E(var) mutants enhance the inactivation of several different variegators and therefore they appear to influence position-effect variegation generally. However, the enhancement caused by the single site E(var) mutations is less striking than that caused by the duplication or by loss of the Y chromosome. The interaction between the E(var) mutants and selected Su(var) mutations, as well as the effects of extra Y heterochromatin on E(var) expression, have also been investigated. Based on the results of these studies, various hypothetical functions of the E(var) ⁺ products are suggested.     

Cytogenetic analysis of variegation suppressors and a dominant temperature-sensitive lethal in region 23–26 of chromosome 2L in Drosophila melanogaster

Three suppressor loci for position-effect variegation, one dominant temperature-sensitive (DTS), three Minute genes, and two recessive visible mutants (ed, tkv) have been cytogenetically localized by using duplications and deficiencies in regions 23-25 of chromosome arm 2L of Drosophila melanogaster. Two of the suppressor loci studied proved to represent haplo-abnormal genes localized in regions 23A6-23F6 and 24E2-25A1, respectively. The third one is a strong triplo-abnormal suppressor mapping in 25F4-26B9 which affects white variegation in wm4h when present in three doses. The l(2)2DTS mutation, which belongs to a group of noncomplementing dominant temperature-sensitive mutations, is localized in the 25A4-B1 region. Furthermore, two Minute genes have been localized in region 24 that are included in Df(2L)M11 and can be separated employing translocation (Y;2)P8 (24E2-4): M(2)LS2 in 24D3-4-24E2-4, and M(2)z in 24E4-5-24F5-7. A third Minute gene (M(2)S1) is localized in 25C3-8-25C9-D1. The usefulness of the isolated chromosomal rearrangements for further genetic studies of region 23-26 is discussed.     

Y chromosome-specific mutations induced by a giant transposon in Drosophila hydei

Summary The w ^m Co duplication of Drosophila hydei (Dp (1; Y) 16B2-17B1) contains 13–16 bands in salivary gland chromosomes. The duplication resides preferentially in the X heterochromatin or on the Y chromosome. In some stocks frequent (up to 4×10^-3) exchanges of the duplication occur between different Y chromosomes (T(X; Y) and free Y) or between the X and the Y chromosome. About 60% of the T(X; Y)-Y exchanges induce mutations in the Y chromosomal male fertility genes of the recipient Y chromosome. From the mutational spectrum generated by the T(X; Y)-Y transpositions and from the variable efficiency as acceptor of different X-Y translocations it can be concluded that the exchanges show a remarkable site specificity: distal positions in the long arm of the Y chromosome are occupied preferentially. More proximal positions in the long arm of insertions into the short arm of the Y chromosome are found only with a lower frequency. No transpositions to the autosomes have been recovered. Duplications are lost with highly differing frequencies. The losses are not linked with insertions of the w ^m Co element into a new position and are more frequent than transpositions. Therefore, we regard the w ^m Co element as a giant transposon.     

Studying Trans-Effects of Modifiers on the Position-Effect Variegation in a Set of Euchromatin–Heterochromatin Rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster

The effects of suppressors of position-effect variegation were studied in a set of euchromatin–heterochromatin rearrangements of the X chromosome accompanied by inactivation of the gene wapl.The rearrangements differed from one another in the size of the heterochromatic block adjacent to euchromatin, with the euchromatin–heterochromatin border remaining unchanged. In one rearrangement (r20), the position effect caused by a small block of adjacent heterochromatin may be determined by its interaction with the neighboring main heterochromatic region of the X chromosome. Chromosome 3 (the RT chromosome) was found to have a strong suppressing effect on all rearrangements, irrespective of the amount of heterochromatin adjacent to euchromatin. Su-var(3)9, a known suppressor of the position-effect variegation, had a considerably weaker suppressing effect. The RT chromosome had the strongest suppressing effect on the rearrangement r20.     

Carnitine suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Carnitine is a well-known naturally occurring compound, very similar to butyrate, with an essential role in intermediary metabolism mainly at the mitochondrial level. Since butyrate inhibits the enzyme histone deacetylase and is capable of suppressing position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster, we tested a further possible function of carnitine in the nucleus, using an assay for the suppression of position-effect variegation. We tested three physiological forms of carnitine (l-carnitine, l-propionylcarnitine, l-acetylcarnitine) for the ability to suppress two different chromosomal rearrangements, inducing variegation of the white ⁺ and brown ⁺ genes. The results show that the carnitine derivatives are capable of suppressing the position-effect variegation, albeit with different efficiencies. The carnitine derivatives interact lethally with Su-var(2)1 ⁰¹, a mutation that induces hyperacetylation of histones, whilst hyperacetylated histories accumulated in both the nuclei of HeLa cells and Drosophila polytene chromosomes treated with the same compounds. These results strongly suggest that the carnitine derivatives suppress position-effect variegation by a mechanism similar to that of butyrate. It is suggested that carnitines may have a functional role in the nucleus, probably at the chromatin level.     

Examination of DNA sequences undergoing chromatin conformation changes at a variegating breakpoint in Drosophila melanogaster

Position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster is associated with the inability of certain genes to be correctly expressed in a proportion of cells, giving a mosaic phenotype. The lack of expression is thought to be due to alterations in the gene's chromatin structure due to its proximity to a region of heterochromatin. Because of the difficulties involved, there is little biochemical data to support the intuitively appealing model of heterochromatin spreading used to explain this phenomenon.Differences in restriction fragment length were used to distinguish DNA regions from either normal (non-position affected) or rearranged (position affected) chromosomes so as to examine possible changes in gene copy number and the effects of endogenous nucleases. DNA sequences at the breakpoint of In (1)w ^m4, which variegates for the white gene, were assayed under conditions where the chromatin conformation was altered using second site modifier mutations (Su(var) or En(var)). No change in the DNA sequerice copy number was observed at either chromosome breakpoint, relative to wild type, when either suppressor or enhancer mutations were present. Therefore copy number change, through differential polyploidization or somatic gene loss, is not affected by Su(var) or En(var) induced changes in the chromatin conformation.Initial experiments showed a gross difference in the sensitivity of DNA to endogenous nucleases that appeared associated with Su(var) and En(var) mutations. En(var) mutation bearing samples appeared delayed in the digestion, relative to Su(var). This differential sensitivity seemed to be genome-wide as there was no detectable difference between either breakpoint of In(1)w ^m4 or the sequences on the homologous w ^- chromosome. However, after isogenizing the genetic background, the previously noted difference between the Su(var) and En(var) mutations was eliminated. In studies dealing with nuclease digestion of chromatin, the isogenization of genetic background is essential before meaningful comparisons can be made.     

Suppressor mutation of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster affecting chromatin properties

The dominant mutation Su-var(2)1 ⁰¹ which suppresses position-effect variegation and displays recessive butyrate sensitivity was found to result in significant hyperacetylation of histone H4. This biochemical finding, as well as the genetic properties of this mutation, strongly suggest that the wild-type product of the corresponding locus is involved in histone H4 deacetylation. In larvae containing the suppressor mutation the accessibility of chromatin to endogenous nucleases is significantly increased which might be causally connected with histone H4 hyperacetylation. The suppressor mutation Su-var(2)1 ⁰¹ has, therefore, to be classified as a chromatin condensation mutation.     

Euchromatic inversions causing mosaic gene expression in Drosophila hydei: A study of forked and Zebra

In D. hydei two new mutants, In(1)f³ and IN(5)Z, show obvious mosaic gene expression. Their phenotypic expression is susceptible to the breeding temperature and to the addition of a supernumerary Y chromosome to the chromosome set. In this respect the mutants resemble standard cases of position-effect variegation based on the action of heterochromatin. However, since neither centromeric nor sex chromosomal heterochromatin apparently are involved, the mutations point to a new type of variegation provoked by euchromatic sections. The mosaic patterns of these mutants, in particular those of In(1)f³, will be described.     

Chromosomal structure is altered by mutations that suppress or enhance position effect variegation

We examined the genetic, morphological, and molecular effects of position effect variegation inDrosophila, and the effects of mutations that either suppress [Su(var)] or enhance [E(var)] this phenomenon. All eightSu(var) mutations examined strongly suppress the inactivation of variegating alleles of the genes white [In(l) w ^m4 ], brown [In (2R)bw ^VDe2 ] and Stubble [T(2;3)Sb ^V ]. TheE(var) mutation enhances variegation of these loci. The chromosomal region 3C-E (26 bands) which includes the white locus is usually packaged as heterochromatin in salivary glands of the variegating strainw ^m4 . Addition of any of theSu(var) mutations restores a more euchromatic morphology to this region. In situ hybridization to polytene chromosomes and DNA blot analyses of gene copy number demonstrate that the DNA of thew ⁺ gene is less accessible to its probe in the variegatingw ^m4 strain than it is in the wildtype or variegation-suppressed strains. Blot analysis of larval salivary gland DNA indicates that the white gene copy number does not vary among the strains. Hence, the differences in binding of thew ⁺ gene probe in the variegating and variegation-suppressed strains reflect differences in chromosomal packaging rather than alterations in gene number. The effects of variegation and theSu(var) mutations on chromatin structure were analyzed further by DNAse I digestion and DNA blot hybridization. In contrast to their dramatic effects on chromosomal morphology and gene expression, theSu(var) mutations had negligible effects on nuclease sensitivity of the white gene chromatin. We suggest that the changes in gene expression resulting from position effect variegation and the action of theSu(var) mutations involve alterations in chromosomal packaging.     

Modifiers of position-effect variegation in the region from 86C to 88B of the Drosophila melanogaster third chromosome

Summary Four dominant suppressor and one enhancer of variegation loci were mapped in the polytene chromosome region extending from section 86C to section 88B of the Drosophila melanogaster third chromosome using a set of deficiencies. The suppressor locus Su-var(3) 14 maps in 86CD, Su-var(3) 13 in 86F4-7, Su-var(3)6 in 87B4-7 and Su-var(3)7 in 87E4-5. The enhancer locus E-var(3)3 maps in 87E12-F11. Su-var(3)13, Su-var(3)6 and Su-var(3)7 are also defined by point mutant alleles originally identified by other criteria (Reuter et al. 1986). Duplications covering the suppressor loci Su-var(3)14, Su-var(3)13, Su-var(3)6 and Su-var(3)7 were found to reduce considerably the haplo-abnormal effect of heterozygous point mutants of the corresponding loci. One suppressor locus, Su-var(3)7, maps within a region which has previously been cloned. The positions of deficiency breakpoints delimiting the suppressor locus indicate that all the necessary sequences for its function are located within 10 kb of cloned DNA.     

An analysis of white-mottled mutants inDrosophila hydei,with observations on X-Y exchanges in the male

Chromosomes and phenotypes of four different sex-linkedwhite-mottled mutants of the position-effect variogation type were studied. Three mutants (w ^m1,w ^m2,w ^m3) are X-chromosomal rearrangements which shift the w⁺ locus into a position close to heterochromatin, but which have different ouchromatic and heterochromatic breaks. The fourth, a spontaneous derivative ofw ^m1, is an insertional duplication of part of the X chromosome, including thew ⁺ andN ⁺loci. The duplicated segment is inserted into the distal part of the long arm of the heterochromatic Y chromosome. It is designated,w ^m CoY, orXw ^m Co when transferred to the X chromosome.Three chromosomal types (w ^m1,w ^m CoY) and (Xw ^m Co) having the same cuchromatic break near thew ⁺ locus, cause large-spotted eyes whereas two others (w ^m2,w ^m3) produce a popper-and-salt type of mottling. From the position of the various eu- and heterochromatic breaks, it appears that the distance of thew ⁺ locus to the point of reunion with heterochromatin, rather than the amount or type of adjoining heterochromatin, dietates the phenotypic action of the displacedw ⁺ locus, in the sense of a spreading effect on two proposed functional subunits within thew ⁺ locus.The pigmentation background against which the mottling effect is produced, i.e., a givenw-allele with its characteristic colour, or other eye colour mutations, does not seem to affect the type of mottling. Drosopterins and ommochromes react in the same way to modifing factors like temperature and supernumerary Y chromosomes. Two mutants (w ^m2 andw ^m CoY) while reacting in the same manner to Y chromosomes showed an opposite temperature response.By exchange between the heterochromatin of the Y and X chromosome inw/w ^m CoY males thew ^m Co duplication was transferred between the sex chromosomes with a certain regularity. It is not yet known wether the exchanges are mitotic or meiotic in origin but their heterochromatic nature has been demonstrated cytologically.     

Position-effect variegation and intercalary heterochromatin: a comparative study

The behaviour of IH (intercalary heterochromatin) regions of Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes was compared with that of euchromatin condensed as a result of position-effect variegation. Normally replicating regions, when subject to such an effect, were found to become among the last regions in the genome to replicate. It is shown that the factors which enhance position effect (low temperature, the removal of the Y chromosome, genetic enhancers of position effect) increase the weak point frequency in the IH, i.e. enhance DNA underreplication in these regions. We suggest that the similarity in the properties of IH, CH (centromeric heterochromatin) and the dense blocks induced by position effect is due to strong genetic inactivation and supercondensation caused by specific proteins in early development. The primary DNA structure is not likely to play a key role in this process.