Identification of two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5.

The nature of the complexes of histones H1 and H5 and their globular domains (GH1 and GH5) with DNA suggested two DNA-binding sites which are likely to be the basis of the preference of H1 and H5 for the nucleosome, compared with free DNA. More recently the X-ray and NMR structures of GH5 and GH1, respectively, have identified two basic clusters on opposite sides of the domains as candidates for these sites. Removal of the positive charge at either location by mutagenesis impairs or abolishes the ability of GH5 to assemble cooperatively in ''tramline'' complexes containing two DNA duplexes, suggesting impairment or loss of its ability to bind two DNA duplexes. The mutant forms of GH5 also fail to protect the additional 20 bp of nucleosomal DNA that are characteristically protected by H1, H5 and wild-type recombinant GH5. They still bind to H1/H5-depleted chromatin, but evidently inappropriately. These results confirm the existence of, and identify the major components of, two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5, and they strongly suggest that both binding sites are required to position the globular domain correctly on the nucleosome.     

N- and C-terminal domains determine differential nucleosomal binding geometry and affinity of linker histone isotypes H1(0) and H1c

Eukaryotic linker or H1 histones modulate DNA compaction and gene expression in vivo. In mammals, these proteins exist as multiple isotypes with distinct properties, suggesting a functional significance to the heterogeneity. Linker histones typically have a tripartite structure composed of a conserved central globular domain flanked by a highly variable short N-terminal domain and a longer highly basic C-terminal domain. We hypothesized that the variable terminal domains of individual subtypes contribute to their functional heterogeneity by influencing chromatin binding interactions. We developed a novel dual color fluorescence recovery after photobleaching assay system in which two H1 proteins fused to spectrally separable fluorescent proteins can be co-expressed and their independent binding kinetics simultaneously monitored in a single cell. This approach was combined with domain swap and point mutagenesis to determine the roles of the terminal domains in the differential binding characteristics of the linker histone isotypes, mouse H1(0) and H1c. Exchanging the N-terminal domains between H1(0) and H1c changed their overall binding affinity to that of the other variant. In contrast, switching the C-terminal domains altered the chromatin interaction surface of the globular domain. These results indicate that linker histone subtypes bind to chromatin in an intrinsically specific manner and that the highly variable terminal domains contribute to differences between subtypes. The methods developed in this study will have broad applications in studying dynamic properties of additional histone subtypes and other mobile proteins.     

Mapping the interaction surface of linker histone H1(0) with the nucleosome of native chromatin in vivo

H1 linker histones stabilize the nucleosome, limit nucleosome mobility and facilitate the condensation of metazoan chromatin. Here, we have combined systematic mutagenesis, measurement of in vivo binding by photobleaching microscopy, and structural modeling to determine the binding geometry of the globular domain of the H1(0) linker histone variant within the nucleosome in unperturbed, native chromatin in vivo. We demonstrate the existence of two distinct DNA-binding sites within the globular domain that are formed by spatial clustering of multiple residues. The globular domain is positioned via interaction of one binding site with the major groove near the nucleosome dyad. The second site interacts with linker DNA adjacent to the nucleosome core. Multiple residues bind cooperatively to form a highly specific chromatosome structure that provides a mechanism by which individual domains of linker histones interact to facilitate chromatin condensation.     

Nucleosome Interaction Surface of Linker Histone H1c Is Distinct from That of H10

The fully organized structure of the eukaryotic nucleosome remains unsolved, in part due to limited information regarding the binding site of the H1 or linker histone. The central globular domain of H1 is believed to interact with the nucleosome core at or near the dyad and to bind at least two strands of DNA. We utilized site-directed mutagenesis and in vivo photobleaching to identify residues that contribute to the binding of the globular domain of the somatic H1 subtype H1c to the nucleosome. As was previously observed for the H1⁰ subtype, the binding residues for H1c are clustered on the surface of one face of the domain. Despite considerable structural conservation between the globular domains of these two subtypes, the locations of the binding sites identified for H1c are distinct from those of H1⁰. We suggest that the globular domains of these two linker histone subtypes will bind to the nucleosome with distinct orientations that may contribute to higher order chromatin structure heterogeneity or to differences in dynamic interactions with other DNA or chromatin-binding proteins.     

Binding Dynamics of Disordered Linker Histone H1 with a Nucleosomal Particle

Linker histone H1 is an essential regulatory protein for many critical biological processes, such as eukaryotic chromatin packaging and gene expression. Mis-regulation of H1s is commonly observed in tumor cells, where the balance between different H1 subtypes has been shown to alter the cancer phenotype. Consisting of a rigid globular domain and two highly charged terminal domains, H1 can bind to multiple sites on a nucleosomal particle to alter chromatin hierarchical condensation levels. In particular, the disordered H1 amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains (NTD/CTD) are believed to enhance this binding affinity, but their detailed dynamics and functions remain unclear. In this work, we used a coarse-grained computational model, AWSEM-DNA, to simulate the H1.0b-nucleosome complex, namely chromatosome. Our results demonstrate that H1 disordered domains restrict the dynamics and conformation of both globular H1 and linker DNA arms, resulting in a more compact and rigid chromatosome particle. Furthermore, we identified regions of H1 disordered domains that are tightly tethered to DNA near the entry-exit site. Overall, our study elucidates at near-atomic resolution the way the disordered linker histone H1 modulates nucleosome’s structural preferences and conformational dynamics.     

Comparative filter binding study of H5 to nucleosome core particles,H1, H5 depleted chromatosomes and DNA fragments

The filter-binding technique with PEI treated glass fiber is used to study the interaction of histone H5 to core particles, chromatosomes and DNA derived from it. By working at very low concentrations of interacting particles we are able to study the effective binding process independent of interfering insoluble complexes. The interactions are characterized by a very high affinity. An intrinsically higher affinity of H5 for cores and chromatosomes versus chromatosome derived DNA is demonstrated. Both chromatosomes and DNA derived from these bind about twice the amount as compared to core particles, which saturate at about one H5 per core particle.Abbreviations GH5 globular domain of histone H5 - PEI polyethyleneimine     

Formation and characterization of soluble complexes of histone H1 with supercoiled DNA

We have analyzed the interaction of rat liver histone H1 with superhelical DNA. Depending on the ratio of H1 to DNA and the concentration of salt, two different types of complexes were found. Above a critical ratio of H1 to DNA, called the aggregation point, large aggregates are formed, which have a cable-like appearance in the electron microscope. Below the aggregation point, individual soluble complexes are formed, which are the subject of this study. With increasing ionic strength, the aggregation point is shifted towards lower ratios of H1 to DNA. In the soluble complexes, H1 appears to bind along superhelically intertwined DNA strands, forming a polymer. Partial digestion of the complexes with protease suggests protection of the N-terminal tail and the globular domain of H1. Similar soluble complexes were observed with various H1 fragments but not with the core histones. In the soluble complexes, similar regions of the H1 molecule are considered to be protected from cleavage by protease, as in chromatin. Therefore, these complexes appear to be a valuable model for the interaction of H1 in chromatin fibers.     

Co-operative binding of the globular domain of histone H5 to DNA.

The globular domain of histone H5 (GH5) was prepared by trypsin digestion of H5 that was extracted from chicken erythrocyte nuclei with NaCl. Electron microscopy, sucrose gradient centrifugation, native agarose gel electrophoresis and equilibrium density gradient ultracentrifugation show that GH5 binds co-operatively to double-stranded DNA. The electron microscopic images suggest that the GH5-DNA complexes are very similar in structure to co-operative complexes of intact histone H1 (or its variants) with double-stranded DNA, studied previously, which have been proposed to consist of two parallel DNA double helices sandwiching a polymer of the protein. For complexes with GH5 or with intact H1, naked DNA co-sediments with the protein-DNA complexes through sucrose gradients, and DNA also appears to protrude from the ends and sides of the complexes; measurements of the protein-DNA stoichiometry in fractionated samples may not reflect the stoichiometry in the complexes. An estimate of the stoichiometry obtained from the buoyant density of fixed GH5-DNA complexes in CsCl suggests that sufficient GH5 is present in the complexes for the GH5s to be in direct contact, as required by a simple molecular mechanism for the co-operative binding. Chemical crosslinking demonstrates that GH5s are in close proximity in the complexes. In the absence of DNA, GH5-GH5 interactions are weak or non-existent.     

Two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5 are required for binding to both bulk and 5 S reconstituted nucleosomes

We have previously shown the existence of two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of H5 (termed GH5), both of which are required for nucleosome organisation, as judged by the protection of a 166 bp chromatosome intermediate during micrococcal nuclease digestion of chromatin. This supports a model in which GH5 contacts two duplexes on the nucleosome. However, studies of a nucleosome assembled on the 5 S rRNA gene have argued against the requirement for two DNA-binding sites for chromatosome protection, which has implications for the role of linker histones. We have used this proposed difference in the requirement for a second site on the globular domain in the two models as a means of investigating whether bulk and reconstituted 5 S nucleosomes are indeed fundamentally different. GH5 protects a 166 bp chromatosome in both "bulk" and 5 S systems, and in both cases protection is abolished when all four basic residues in site II are replaced by alanine. Binding to four-way DNA junctions, which present a pair of juxtaposed duplexes, is also abolished. Single mutations of the basic residues did not abolish chromatosome protection in either system, or binding to four-way junctions, suggesting that the residues function as a cluster. Both bulk and 5 S nucleosomes thus require a functional second DNA-binding site on GH5 in order to bind properly to the nucleosome. This is likely to reflect a similar mode of binding in each case, in which two DNA duplexes are contacted in the nucleosome. There is no indication from these experiments that linker histones bind fundamentally differently to 5 S and bulk nucleosomes.     

Distinct properties of the two putative "globular domains" of the yeast linker histone, Hho1p

The putative linker histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hho1p, has two regions of sequence (GI and GII) that are homologous to the single globular domains of linker histones H1 and H5 in higher eukaryotes. However, the two Hho1p "domains" differ with respect to the conservation of basic residues corresponding to the two putative DNA-binding sites (sites I and II) on opposite faces of the H5 globular domain. We find that GI can protect chromatosome-length DNA, like the globular domains of H1 and H5 (GH1 and GH5), but GII does not protect. However, GII, like GH1 and GH5, binds preferentially (and with higher affinity than GI) to four-way DNA junctions in the presence of excess linear DNA competitor, and binds more tightly than GI to linker-histone-depleted chromatin. Surprisingly, in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), GII is largely unfolded, whereas GI, like GH1 and GH5, is structured, with a high alpha-helical content. However, in the presence of high concentrations of large tetrahedral anions (phosphate, sulphate, perchlorate) GII is also folded; the anions presumably mimic DNA in screening the positive charge. This raises the possibility that chromatin-bound Hho1p may be bifunctional, with two folded nucleosome-binding domains.     

H1 family histones in the nucleus. Control of binding and localization by the C-terminal domain

H1 histones bind to DNA as they enter and exit the nucleosome. H1 histones have a tripartite structure consisting of a short N-terminal domain, a highly conserved central globular domain, and a lysine-and arginine-rich C-terminal domain. The C-terminal domain comprises approximately half of the total amino acid content of the protein, is essential for the formation of compact chromatin structures, and contains the majority of the amino acid variations that define the individual histone H1 family members. This region contains several cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation sites and is thought to function through a charge-neutralization process, neutralizing the DNA phosphate backbone to allow chromatin compaction. In this study, we use fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching to define the behavior of the individual histone H1 subtypes in vivo. We find that there are dramatic differences in the binding affinity of the individual histone H1 subtypes in vivo and differences in their preference for euchromatin and heterochromatin. Further, we show that subtype-specific properties originate with the C terminus and that the differences in histone H1 binding are not consistent with the relatively small changes in the net charge of the C-terminal domains.     

Salt-dependent co-operative interaction of histone H1 with linear DNA

The nature of the complexes formed between histone H1 and linear double-stranded DNA is dependent on ionic strength and on the H1 : DNA ratio. At an input ratio of less than about 60% (w/w) H1 : DNA, there is a sharp transition from non-co-operative to co-operative binding at a critical salt concentration that depends on the DNA size and is in the range 20 to 50 mM-NaCl. Above this critical ionic strength the H1 binds to only some of the DNA molecules leaving the rest free, as shown by sedimentation analysis. The ionic strength range over which this change in behaviour occurs is also that over which chromatin folding is induced. Above the salt concentration required for co-operative binding of H1 to DNA, but not below it, H1 molecules are in close proximity as shown by the formation of H1 polymers upon chemical cross-linking. The change in binding mode is not driven by the folding of the globular domain of H1, since this is already folded at low salt in the presence of DNA, as indicated by its resistance to tryptic digestion. The H1-DNA complexes at low salt, where H1 is bound distributively to all DNA molecules, contain thickened regions about 6 nm across interspersed with free DNA, as shown by electron microscopy. The complexes formed at higher salt through co-operative interactions are rods of relatively uniform width (11 to 15 nm) whose length is about 1.6 times shorter than that of the input DNA, or are circular if the DNA is long enough. They contain approximately 70% (w/w) H1 : DNA and several DNA molecules. These thick complexes can also be formed at low salt (15 mM-NaCl) when the H1 : DNA input ratio is sufficiently high (approximately 70%).     

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae linker histone Hho1p, with two globular domains, can simultaneously bind to two four-way junction DNA molecules

Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a single linker histone, Hho1p, with two globular domains. This raised the possibility that Hho1p could bind to two nucleosome cores simultaneously. To evaluate this idea, we studied the ability of a four-way junction, immobilized on the surface of a magnetic bead, to pull down a radiolabeled four-way junction in the presence of different Hho1 proteins. Four-way junctions are known to bind to H1, presumably due to structure similarities to the DNA at the nucleosomal entry/exit point. We found a significant increase in the ability of full-length Hho1p to pull down radiolabeled four-way junction DNA under ionic conditions where both globular domains could bind. The binding was structure specific, since the use of double-stranded DNA, or a mutant Hho1p in which the second DNA binding site of globular domain 1 was abolished, resulted in a significant decrease in bridged binding. Additionally, bridged binding required a covalent attachment between the two globular domains, since factor Xa protease treatment of the complex formed by a modified Hho1p that contained a factor Xa cleavage site between the two globular domains resulted in a significant release of radiolabeled four-way junction. These findings demonstrated that the two globular domains independently associated with two different four-way junction molecules in a manner that required amino acid residues implicated in structure-specific binding in the nucleosome. We discuss the implication of these findings on the chromatin structure of yeast and propose a model where a single Hho1 protein binds to two serially adjacent nucleosomes.     

Differences in the binding of H1 variants to DNA. Cooperativity and linker-length related distribution

A study of the complexes formed between short linear DNA and three H1 variants, a typical somatic H1, and the extreme variants H5, from chicken erythrocytes, and spH1 from sea urchin sperm, has revealed differences between H1, H5 and spH1 that have implications for chromatin structure and folding. 1. All three histones bind cooperatively to DNA in 35 mM NaCl forming similar, but not identical, rod-like complexes. With sufficiently long DNA the complexes may be circular, circles forming more easily with H5 and spH1 than with H1. 2. The binding of H5 and spH1 to DNA is cooperative even in 5 mM NaCl, resulting in well-defined thin filaments that appear to contain two DNA molecules bridged by histone molecules. In contrast, H1 binds distributively over all the DNA molecules in 5 mM NaCl, but forms short stretches similar in appearance to the thin filaments formed with H5 and spH1. Rods appear to arise from the intertwining of regular thin filaments containing cooperatively bound histone molecules on raising the NaCl concentration to 35 mM. 3. The compositions of the rods correspond to one histone molecule for about every 47 bp (H1), 81 bp (H5) and 112 bp (spH1), suggesting average spacings of 24 bp (H1), 41 bp (H5) and 56 bp (spH1) in the component thin (double) filaments. Strikingly, these values are proportional to the linker lengths of the chromatins in which the particular H1 variant is the main or sole H1.     

The globular region of histone H5 is equally accessible to antibodies in relaxed and condensed chromatin

The accessibility of histone H5 in chromatin was examined with monoclonal antibodies recognizing several epitopes of the globular region (GH5) of the histone (Rózalski, M., Lafleur, L., and Ruiz-Carrillo, A. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 14379-14385). The stoichiometry of the chromatin-antibody complexes indicated that while 0-86% of the H5 molecules were able to react, depending on the particular epitope, the extent of antibody binding to relaxed chromatin (in 5 mM KCl) and condensed chromatin (in 100 mM KCl or 0.35 mM MgCl2) was virtually identical. This indicates that the topography of H5 does not change during the conformational transition of chromatin. The data suggest that H5 is not completely internalized in the 30-nm fiber or that the fiber is flexible enough to allow full exposure of the GH5 epitopes. Several control experiments, including monoclonal antibody binding, sedimentation analysis, DNase II digestion, and glutaraldehyde cross-linking, showed that epitope accessibility is not due to H5 exchange or to perturbation of the chromatin fiber. The accessibility of GH5 suggests ways in which inactive chromatin may be unfolded in vivo.     

DNA-induced alpha-helical structure in the NH2-terminal domain of histone H1

It is important to establish the structural properties of linker histones to understand the role they play in chromatin higher order structure and gene regulation. Here, we use CD, NMR, and IR spectroscopy to study the conformation of the amino-terminal domain of histone H1 degrees, free in solution and bound to the DNA. The NH(2)-terminal domain has little structure in aqueous solution, but it acquires a substantial amount of alpha-helical structure in the presence of trifluoroethanol (TFE). As in other H1 subtypes, the basic residues of the NH(2)-terminal domain of histone H1 degrees are clustered in its COOH-terminal half. According to the NMR results, the helical region comprises the basic cluster (Lys(11)-Lys(20)) and extends until Asp(23). The fractional helicity of this region in 90% TFE is about 50%. His(24) together with Pro(25) constitute the joint between the NH(2)-terminal helix and helix I of the globular domain. Infrared spectroscopy shows that interaction with the DNA induces an amount of alpha-helical structure equivalent to that observed in TFE. As coulombic interactions are involved in complex formation, it is highly likely in the complexes with DNA that the minimal region with alpha-helical structure is that containing the basic cluster. In chromatin, the high positive charge density of the inducible NH(2)-terminal helical element may contribute to the binding stability of the globular domain.     

Monoclonal antibodies against distinct determinants of histone H5 bind to chromatin

A series of monoclonal antibodies specific for distinguishable epitopes in chromosomal protein histone H5 were obtained from mice immunized with either free H5 or H5 . RNA complexes. The antibodies elicited by H5 could be distinguished from those elicited by H5 . RNA by their binding to native or acid-denatured H5, by their interaction with the globular region of H5, and by their cross-reactivity with H1o. The specificity of the antibodies was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting experiments. The antibodies could distinguish between H5 and the closely related histones H1 and H1o. The binding of some of the antibodies to the antigens was dependent on the type of assay used, suggesting nonrandom binding of the antigen to the solid supports used in ELISA and immunoblotting. Competitive ELISA experiments indicate that 8 of the 11 antibodies characterized bind to distinct epitopes. Three monoclonal antibodies bind to epitopes which are in close spatial proximity, causing mutual steric hindrance. The monoclonal antibodies bind to nuclei of fixed cells and to isolated chromatin, indicating that the epitopes are present both in the purified protein and in chromatin-complexed H5. These monoclonal antibodies can be used to study the organization of distinct regions of histones H5 and H1o in chromatin and chromosomes.     

Histone H1 and chromatin higher order structure. Does histone H1 exhibit specific self-association?

1. Histones H1 and H5 in chromatin and in free solution can be cross-linked to higher multimers. Is this due to a specific protein/protein interaction? If so, this interaction might be the structural basis of the condensation of the chromosomal nucleofilament, known to be mediated by histones H1 and H5. 2. Since only the central domain of H1 and H5 exhibits tertiary folding and globular structure, this is the most likely site of specific interaction. 3. Formaldehyde has been used to test whether the central domains of histone H1 from calf thymus or from sea urchin sperm or histone H5 from chicken erythrocytes self-interact. 4. The cross-linking shown by each globular peptide was compared with that of its parent histone. 5. In all three cases the peptide cross-linked to a much lower extent than its intact parent histone and the observed cross-linked rates were roughly in proportion to the relative number of lysine residues parent histone and peptide. 6. It is concluded that there is no specific self-interaction between the globular domains of either H1 or H5 molecules in free solution. 7. This result suggests that specific H1/H1 protein/protein interactions are not the basic cause of chromatin condensation.