Rates of R1 and R2 retrotransposition and elimination from the rDNA locus of Drosophila melanogaster

R1 and R2 elements are non-LTR retrotransposons that insert specifically into the 28S rRNA genes of arthropods. The process of concerted evolution of the rDNA locus should give rise to rapid turnover of these mobile elements compared to elements that insert at sites throughout a genome. To estimate the rate of R1 and R2 turnover we have examined the insertion of new elements and elimination of old elements in the Harwich mutation accumulation lines of Drosophila melanogaster, a set of inbred lines maintained for >350 generations. Nearly 300 new insertion and elimination events were observed in the 19 Harwich lines. The retrotransposition rate for R1 was 18 times higher than the retrotransposition rate for R2. Both rates were within the range previously found for retrotransposons that insert outside the rDNA loci in D. melanogaster. The elimination rates of R1 and R2 from the rDNA locus were similar to each other but over two orders of magnitude higher than that found for other retrotransposons. The high rates of R1 and R2 elimination from the rDNA locus confirm that these elements must maintain relatively high rates of retrotransposition to ensure their continued presence in this locus.     

A single lineage of r2 retrotransposable elements is an active, evolutionarily stable component of the Drosophila rDNA locus

R2 elements are non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons that insert specifically in the 28S rRNA genes of many insects. Previous reports concerning this element in the genus Drosophila have suggested that R2 elements are absent from many species of this genus, particularly those species from the subgenus Drosophila. In this report, we present an extensive study of the distribution and evolution of R2 elements in Drosophila. A PCR survey of 59 species from 23 species groups of the two major Drosophila subgenera found that R2 elements are present in all but two species of the melanogaster species subgroup. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial nucleotide sequences of R2 elements from 23 species demonstrates that the relationships of R2 elements are congruent with those of the Drosophila species phylogeny, suggesting that these elements have been vertically inherited since the divergence of this genus some 60 MYA. Sequence variation between different copies of R2 elements within each species was less than 0.16%, indicating that these elements are undergoing concerted evolution similar to that of the 28S genes. Several properties of the R2 sequences suggest that these elements depend on retrotransposition in addition to simple recombination to remain within the rDNA locus: the rates of synonymous substitutions averaged 4.8 times the rate of replacement substitutions, 82 of 83 R2 copies partially sequenced contained intact open reading frames, and, finally, length variation associated with the poly(A) 3' tails indicated that many R2 copies are the direct result of retrotransposition.      

The structure of a single unit of ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) including intergenic subrepeats in the Australian bulldog ant Myrmecia croslandi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

A complete single unit of a ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) of M. croslandi was sequenced. The ends of the 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNA genes were determined by using the sequences of D. melanogaster rDNAs as references. Each of the tandemly repeated rDNA units consists of coding and non-coding regions whose arrangement is the same as that of D. melanogaster rDNA. The intergenic spacer (IGS) contains, as in other species, a region with subrepeats, of which the sequences are different from those previously reported in other insect species. The length of IGSs was estimated to be 7-12 kb by genomic Southern hybridization, showing that an rDNA repeating unit of M. croslandi is 14-19 kb-long. The sequences of the coding regions are highly conserved, whereas IGS and ITS (internal transcribed spacer) sequences are not. We obtained clones with insertions of various sizes of R2 elements, the target sequence of which was found in the 28S rRNA coding region. A short segment in the IGS that follows the 3' end of the 28S rRNA gene was predicted to form a secondary structure with long stems.     

Evolution of R1 and R2 in the rDNA units of the genus Drosophila

R1 and R2 are non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposable elements that specifically insert in the 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes of insects. Using the Drosophila genus, which includes some of the best characterized insect taxa, we have conducted a number of studies on the evolution of these elements. We find that R1 and R2 are subject to the same recombinational forces that give rise to the concerted evolution of the rDNA units. The turnover of R1 and R2 elements can be readily documented in different strains of D. melanogaster using 5′ truncated elements as restriction-length polymorphisms. This turnover leads to uniform populations of elements with nucleotide sequence divergence of different copies averaging only 0.23% for the R2 and 0.47% for the R1 elements. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of elements from 16 different species of Drosophila suggests that these elements have been stable components of the rDNA locus for the 50–70 million year history of the Drosophila genus. Using changes at synonymous positions within the protein-encoding regions as estimates of the baseline substitution rate, it could be shown that R1 and R2 are evolving at rates similar to that of typical protein encoding genes provided corrections are made for the low codon bias of the elements. R1 and R2 are clearly well-adapted for their existence in the rDNA units of their host. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Rapid R2 retrotransposition leads to the loss of previously inserted copies via large deletions of the rDNA locus

R2 non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements insert specifically into the 28S rRNA genes of a wide range of animals. These elements maintain long-term stable relationships with the host genome. By scoring the variation present at the 5' ends of individual R2 copies, lines of Drosophila simulans have been identified with high rates of R2 retrotransposition. Comparing the R2 elements present in the parents with that of their progeny after 1 or 30 generations in this report revealed that retrotransposition rates were higher through the female germ line compared with the male germ line. In addition, most events in females occur late in germ line development. Surprisingly, the gain of new R2 insertions by retrotranspositions was counterbalanced by deletions of preexisting R2 insertions. These deletions occurred by the loss of large segments of the rDNA units that contained on average an estimated 15 R2 elements. When monitored over single generations, the rate of loss of preexisting elements was higher than the rate of new insertions. However, the chromosomes with the largest deletions appear to be eliminated from the population because the rates of R2 insertions and deletions after 30 generations were approximately equal. These findings suggest that high rates of R2 retrotransposition do not necessarily lead to dramatic increases in the level of R2 insertions in the rDNA locus but can lead to a more rapid turnover of rDNA units.     

Competition between R1 and R2 transposable elements in the 28S rRNA genes of insects

R1 and R2 are non-LTR retrotransposons that insert in the 28S rRNA genes of arthropods. R1 elements insert into a site that is 74 bp downstream of the R2 insertion site, thus the presence of an R2 in the same 28S gene may inhibit the expression of R1. Consistent with such a suggestion, the R1 elements of Drosophila melanogaster have a strong bias against inserting into 28S genes already containing an R2 element. R2 elements, on the other hand, are only 2-3 fold inhibited from inserting into a 28S gene already containing an R1. D. melanogaster R1 elements are unusual in that they generate a 23-bp deletion of the target site upstream of the insertion. Using in vitro assays developed to study R2 integration, we show that the presence of R1 sequences 51 bp downstream of the R2 insertion site changes the nucleosomal structure that can be formed by the R2 target site. The R2 endonuclease is inhibited from cleaving these altered nucleosomes. We suggest that R1 elements have been selected to make this large deletion of the 28S gene to block the insertion of an upstream R2 element. These findings are consistent with the model that R1 and R2 are in competition for the limited number of insertion sites available within their host's genome.     

R1 and R2 retrotransposition and deletion in the rDNA loci on the X and Y chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster

The non-LTR retrotransposons R1 and R2 insert into the 28S rRNA genes of arthropods. Comparisons among Drosophila lineages have shown that these elements are vertically inherited, while studies within species have indicated a rapid turnover of individual copies (elimination of old copies and the insertion of new copies). To better understand the turnover of R1 and R2, 200 retrotranspositions and nearly 100 eliminations have been scored in the Harwich mutation-accumulation lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Because the rDNA arrays in D. melanogaster are present on the X and Y chromosomes and no exchanges were detected in these lines, it was possible to show that R1 retrotranspositions occur predominantly in the male germ line, while R2 retrotranspositions were more evenly divided between the germ lines of both sexes. The rate of elimination of elements from the Y rDNA array was twice that of the X rDNA array with both chromosomal loci containing regions where the rate of elimination was on average eight times higher. Most R1 and R2 eliminations appear to occur by large intrachromosomal events (i.e., loop-out events) that involve multiple rDNA units. These findings are interpreted in light of the known abundance of R1 and R2 elements in the X and Y rDNA loci of D. melanogaster.     

Characterization of active R2 retrotransposition in the rDNA locus of Drosophila simulans

The rRNA gene (rDNA) loci of all arthropod lineages contain non-LTR retrotransposable elements that have evolved to specifically insert into the 28S rRNA genes. Extensive in vitro experiments have been conducted to investigate the mechanism of R2 retrotransposition but little is known of the insertion frequency or cellular factors that might regulate R2 activity. In this article, isofemale lines obtained from a population of Drosophila simulans were surveyed for recent R2 insertions. Within most lines, all individuals showed the same collection of R2 insertions, providing no evidence for recent R2 activity. However, in a few of the isofemale lines, virtually all individuals differed in their R2 insertion profiles. The descendants of individual pairs of flies from these "active lines" rapidly accumulated new insertions. The frequent insertion of new R2 elements was associated with the elimination of old R2 elements from the rDNA locus. The existence of lines in which R2 retrotransposes frequently and lines in which the elements appear dormant suggests that cellular mechanisms that can regulate the activity of R2 exist. Retrotransposition activity was correlated with the number of full-length R2 elements but not with the size of the rDNA locus or the number of uninserted units.     

Characterization of cloned ribosomal DNA from Drosophila hydei.

The structure of ribosomal genes from the fly Drosophila hydei has been analyzed. EcoRI fragments, cloned in a plasmid vector, were mapped by restriction enzyme analysis. The lengths of the regions coding for 18S and 28S rRNA were defined by R-loop formation. From these data a physical map of the rRNA genes was constructed. There are two major types of rDNA units in D. hydei, one having a size of 11 kb and the other a size of 17 kb. The 17 kb unit results from an intervening sequence (ivs) of 6.0 kb, interrupting the beta-28S rRNA coding region. Some homology between th D. hydei ivs and D. melanogaster type 1 ivs has been described previously (1). However, the restriction sites within these ivs show considerable divergence. Whereas D. hydei rDNA D. melanogaster rDNA, the nontranscribed spacer has little, if any, sequence homology. Despite difference in sequence, D. hydei and D. melanogaster spacers show structural similarities in that both contain repeated sequence elements of similar size and location.     

Multiple lineages of R1 retrotransposable elements can coexist in the rDNA loci of Drosophila

R1 non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements insert specifically into the 28S rRNA genes of arthropods. One aspect of R1 evolution that has been difficult to explain is the presence of divergent lineages of R1 in the rDNA loci of the same species. Multiple lineages should compete for a limited number of insertion sites, in addition to being subject to the concerted evolution processes homogenizing the rRNA genes. The presence of multiple lineages suggests either the ability of the elements to overcome these factors and diverge within rDNA loci, or the introduction of new lineages by horizontal transmission. To address this issue, we attempted to characterize the complete set of R1 elements in the rDNA locus from five Drosophila species groups (melanogaster, obscura, testacea, quinaria, and repleta). Two major R1 lineages, A and B, that diverged about 100 MYA were found to exist in Drosophila. Elements of the A lineage were found in all 35 Drosophila species tested, while elements of the B lineage were found in only 11 species from three species groups. Phylogenetic analysis of the R1 elements, supported by comparison of their rates of nucleotide sequence substitution, revealed that both the A and the B lineages have been maintained by vertical descent. The B lineage was less stable and has undergone numerous, independent elimination events, while the A lineage has diverged into three sublineages, which were, in turn, differentially stable. We conclude that while the differential retention of multiple lineages greatly complicates its phylogenetic history, the available R1 data continue to be consistent with the strict vertical descent of these elements.