Monoclonal antibodies in the cytodiagnosis of serous effusions

In order to assess the value of immunocytochemical staining as a method of discriminating between benign reactive mesothelial cells and malignant epithelial cells in serous effusions, we have studied the reactions of a panel of commercially available antibodies on cells harvested from 83 pleural and peritoneal fluids and compared the results with the clinical and cytological diagnoses. The antibodies used were raised against cytokeratin (PKK1), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), pregnancy specific B1-glycoprotein (SP1) and leucocyte common antigen (LCA). Anti-CEA was positive in 16 of 39 effusions (41%) containing carcinoma cells. Pregnancy specific B1-glycoprotein (SP1) was positive in 33% of the same samples. Mesothelial cells did not stain with these antibodies. Thus anti-CEA and SP1 can be used to discriminate between benign mesothelial and malignant epithelial cells in effusions. Anti-PKK1 stained both benign reactive mesothelial cells and malignant epithelial cells and cannot be used to discriminate between these two cell types. Strong positive staining of malignant cells was noted with anti-EMA. However, as occasional weak staining of mesothelial cells was also noted, strong staining with this antibody may be regarded as suspicious but not conclusive of malignancy.     

Immunocytochemical Staining of Serous Effusions With the Monoclonal Antibody Ber-Ep4

Cytospin preparations were made from 102 serous effusions for immunocytochemical staining using a panel of monoclonal antibodies including a new monoclonal antibody Ber-EP4. On cytological examination, 32 fluids were reported to contain tumour cells consistent with metastatic adenocarcinoma; 66 contained benign cells only and three were reported to contain cells suspicious of malignancy. One effusion contained tumour cells consistent with malignant mesothelioma. Positive staining of the tumour cells with Ber-EP4 was observed in the 32 effusions (100%) which contained adenocarcinoma cells. No staining of the mesothelial cells in these 32 specimens was observed. Carcinoembryonic antigen, epithelial membrane antigen Ca2 and CD15 staining of tumour cells was noted in 53%, 50%, 50% and 9% of these cases, respectively. None of the mesothelial cells in the benign effusions stained with Ber-EP4. Nor did the malignant mesothelial cells in the only case of malignant mesothelioma. These findings suggest that Ber-EP4 is a valuable addition to antibodies available for the differential diagnosis of mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma cells in serous effusions.     

Lower proliferation rate in metastatic effusion mesothelial cells than in benign effusions

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proliferation rates of mesothelial cells in metastatic and benign effusions. STUDY DESIGN: Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed pellets from 16 malignant and 9 benign clinical effusions. Dual staining with antibodies against Ki-67 (MIB-1) and desmin was applied to all effusions to differentiate between benign mesothelial cells and malignant cells, and the proportions of desmin+/Ki-67+ and desmin+/Ki-67- cells were calculated. RESULTS: In 7 malignant effusions no proliferating mesothelial cells were found, whereas some rate of proliferation could always be demonstrated in mesothelial cells in the benign effusions. Further, the median proportions of proliferating cells, malignant 2% vs. benign 11%, differed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this finding has not been previously described, and it may have implications for both cytologic diagnosis and the understanding of tumor biology and the interaction between tumor cells and mesothelial cells.     

Immunophenotyping of Mesothelial Cells and Carcinoma Cells With Monoclonal Antibodies to Cytokeratins, Vimentin, Cea and Ema Improves the Cytodiagnosis of Serous Effusions

This paper presents an immunocytochemical study performed on cytocentrifuged deposits from 109 peritoneal and pleural effusions including 20 transudates, 43 malignant metastatic effusions and 46 effusions containing atypical cells, unidentifiable as reactive mesothelial or malignant epithelial cells on the classical morphological criteria. A panel of four monoclonal antibodies (MAb) was used, including KL1 directed to cytokeratins (KER), V9 to vimentin (VIM), NEO 723 to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and E29 to epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). In most transudates the reactive mesothelial cells coexpressed VIM and KER with a ring-like pattern for the latter proteins. In contrast, they were unreactive to anti-CEA and weakly and inconsistently reactive to anti-EMA. In malignant effusions, most carcinoma cells coexpressed EMA, CEA and KER with a predominant diffuse cytoplasmic pattern for the latter. Only a few malignant epithelial cells from five metastatic adenocarcinomas weakly expressed VIM. When used on the 46 effusions with unidentifiable cells, the panel of MAb allowed reactive mesothelial cells and malignant epithelial cells to be distinguished from each other in 39 of 46 cases (85%).     

Diagnostic utility of sialosyl-Tn in discriminating carcinomatous cells from benign mesothelium in body cavity effusions

OBJECTIVE: Detecting malignant cells in the setting of reactive mesothelium can be difficult. Several techniques have been tried but without widespread acceptance. Sialosyl-Tn (STn) is an aberrantly glycosylated precursor of the MN blood group antigen frequently expressed in carcinomas and dysplastic epithelium. We investigated the STn monoclonal antibody for its clinical utility as an isolated stain to discriminate benign mesothelium from malignant cells. STUDY DESIGN: Cell block material from 72 cases of body cavity fluids were immunostained for STn using the avidin-biotin complex method without antigen retrieval. Slides were incubated overnight at 4 degrees C in a humidified chamber. RESULTS: Strong immunoreactivity was noted in 31/40 (77%) carcinomatous cases. Only moderate staining was noted in 1 of 28 (4%) benign effusions and weak staining in 5 (18%) additional benign cases. Specificity was 100%, sensitivity 78%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 76%. No staining was noted in four noncarcinomatous malignant effusions. CONCLUSION: STn may have diagnostic value in this cytologic setting as part of a diagnostic panel but not as an isolated stain.     

Diagnostic interest of the monoclonal antibody CA1 in malignant pleural effusion

The Ca1 antibody was used in an immunohistochemical procedure on smears of cells from 40 patients with malignant pleural effusion. The control group consisted of 25 benign pleural effusions with a high percentage of reactive mesothelial cells. The Ca1 Mc Ab was positive in 19 (79%) of the 24 pleural effusions with positive malignant cytology. In all the benign cases the Ca1 Mc Ab was negative (100% specificity). The Ca1 Mc Ab detected malignant mesothelial cells in two cases and was negative with reactive mesothelial cells and other nucleated cells present in the pleural effusion. We conclude that the Ca1 antibody offers a useful diagnostic method for malignant pleural effusions, when the morphological interpretation is doubtful.     

Use of desmin immunohistochemistry to distinguish between mesothelial cells and carcinoma in serous fluid cell block preparations

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of immunohistochemical stains for desmin in discriminating mesothelial cells from adenocarcinoma in serous fluid cell block preparations. STUDY DESIGN: Cell block preparations from 22 cases (representing 18 patients) that were positive for carcinoma and 5 cases that were negative for malignancy were immunostained with an antibody to desmin. Positive staining was evaluated and scored semiquantitatively in both tumor cells and background mesothelial cells in the malignant cases and mesothelial cells in the negative controls. Staining was evaluated with a score of 0-3 for intensity and 0-5 for distribution. The sum of the two scores was recorded as the total score (TS). RESULTS: Mesothelial cells from all the carcinoma and benign cases stained with desmin (median TS = 5.5, range 4-8), typically strong in intensity and widespread in distribution. Positivity was observed in carcinoma cells in all cases, typically weak and focal (range 2-4). Using a total score of 4 as a cutoff for definitively positive staining, desmin staining was positive in mesothelial cells in 25/25 cases and carcinoma cells in 1/22 cases (P < .0001, Fisher's exact test). Additionally, using the Mann-Whitney ranked sum test on the 20 cases with evaluable mesothelial cells, the medians of the total scores for mesothelial cells (5.5) and carcinoma cells (2.5) were significantly different (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: A total score of > or = 4 was significantly associated with mesothelial cell staining. Use of desmin immunohistochemical staining in cell block preparations may be helpful in distinguishing between mesothelial cells and carcinoma.     

Comparison of NCL-hTERT antibody reactivity and telomere repeat amplification protocol in situ in effusions

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performances of 2 methods, telomerase repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) in situ and antibodies to the hTERT protein, in assessing telomerase activity. STUDY DESIGN: TRAP in situ and immunohistochemistry with a commercial antibody (NCL-hTERT) was performed on 54 body cavity effusions. The results were compared and correlated to diagnosis. RESULTS: Thirty-four effusions from patients with verified malignant disease contained cytologically malignant cells. Both methods were positive in 33 of the cases, whereas only hTERT was positive in 1 case. Twenty effusions, all containing mesothelial cells, came from patients with benign conditions. In 2 fluids atypical, hyperplastic mesothelial cells were both TRAP in situ and hTERT positive. All remaining 18 fluids were TRAP in situ negative, whereas 12 of 18 were hTERT positive. Thus the results of TRAP in situ and hTERT immunohistochemistry disagreed in 1 of 34 (3%) malignant and 12 of 20 (60%) benign cases. CONCLUSION: The sensitivities for malignancy were similar for TRAP in situ and hTERT immunohistochemistry. The specificity of the applied hTERT antibody was significantly lower, due to hTERT reactivity in mesothelial cells.     

Quantitative cytology in ovarian carcinoma ascitic fluids

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of quantitative methods in the differential diagnosis between ovarian carcinoma cells and mesothelial cells in ascitic fluids. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety ascitic fluid samples, previously reported as positive for ovarian carcinoma (30 cases), suspicious for malignancy (30) and negative for malignancy, containing only reactive mesothelial cells (30), were retrieved from the files. In each of these specimens the nuclear area, perimeter, roundness and shape coefficient of 100 cells were determined at 630 x magnification. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and, for multiple comparisons, the Student-Newman-Keuls technique. RESULTS: Mean values for nuclear area and perimeter were higher in malignant cells as compared to reactive mesothelial cells, whereas those for roundness and shape coefficients were lower. All differences were statistically significant, the former two at a .05 level and the latter at the .001 level. CONCLUSION: Quantitative methods can reliably support the differential diagnosis between ovarian carcinoma cells and mesothelial cells in ascitic fluid specimens.     

Diagnostic utility of GLUT-1 expression in the cytologic evaluation of serous fluids

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent to which adenocarcinomas in body cavity fluids express GLUT-1 in comparison to currently available markers for adenocarcinomas. STUDY DESIGN: Archival paraffin-embedded cell blocks of serous fluids from 25 cases of benign effusions containing reactive mesothelial cells and 39 cases of malignant effusions with metastatic adenocarcinoma (11 ovarian, 11 pulmonary, 9 gastrointestinal and 8 breast) were retrieved from the surgical pathology files. All cases were stained with antibodies for GLUT-1, Ber-Ep4, B72.3 and CEA. Positive staining was defined as distinct linear membrane staining for GLUT-1 and Ber-EP4, cytoplasmic staining for CEA, and cytoplasmic or membrane staining for B72.3. Strong staining in at least 10% of the tumor cells was required in order to consider the case positive for the particular marker. RESULTS: GLUT-1 was expressed in 72% (28 of 39) of cases of malignant effusions: 100% (11 of 11) from the ovary, 91% (10 of 11) from the lung, 67% (6 of 9) from the gastrointestinal tract and 12% (1 of 8) from the breast. None (0 of 25) of the benign effusions expressed GLUT-1. Malignant effusions expressed CEA in 74% (29 of 39), Ber-Ep4 in 85% (33 of 39), and B72.3 in 62% (24 of 39). Benign effusions expressed CEA in 3 cases and B72.3 in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: GLUT-1 is a useful marker that can be applied to cytologic specimens. It can be used as a reliable component of an antibody panel to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic adenocarcinoma in particular adenocarcinomas of body cavity effusions, in particular adenocarcinomas of ovarian and pulmonary origin.     

Cytophotometric determination of DNA in mesotheliomas and reactive mesothelial cells

Cytophotometry was used to study the nuclear DNA content of cells in Feulgen-stained effusion specimens from 18 patients with mesothelioma and 14 patients with reactive mesothelial proliferations. The mean DNA content (MDNA) of mesothelioma cells was significantly higher than that of reactive mesothelial cells (P less than .001). Other parameters reflecting the DNA content also differed significantly between the two kinds of cells, including (1) the ratio of mean mesothelial DNA to mean lymphocyte DNA, (2) the percentage of mesothelial cells with DNA content exceeding three times the lymphocyte MDNA and (3) the coefficient of variation of the DNA content. Since these parameters were highly correlated, only one was accepted in a stepwise linear discriminant model for distinguishing reactive from mesotheliomatous effusions. The model correctly classified all of the reactive effusions studied and 89% of the mesotheliomatous effusions. These results indicate that DNA analysis, using the Feulgen stain and cytophotometry, yields criteria that may be useful in distinguishing benign reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in effusions when used in conjunction with other traditional parameters.     

Heparanase induces Akt phosphorylation via a lipid raft receptor

The endoglycosidase heparanase is the predominant enzyme that degrades heparan sulfate side chains of heparan sulfate proteoglycans, activity that is strongly implicated in tumor metastasis. Apart of its well characterized enzymatic activity, heparanase was noted to exert also enzymatic-independent functions. Among these is the induction of Akt/PKB phosphorylation noted in endothelial- and tumor-derived cells. Protein domains of heparanase required for signaling were not identified to date, nor were identified heparanase binding proteins/receptors capable of transmitting heparanase signals. Here, we examined the possible function of mannose 6-phosphate receptor (MPR) and low-density lipoprotein-receptor related protein (LRP), recently implicated in cellular uptake of heparanase, as heparanase receptors mediating Akt phosphorylation. We found that heparanase addition to MPR- and LRP-deficient fibroblasts elicited Akt activation indistinguishable from control fibroblasts. In contrast, disruption of lipid rafts abrogated Akt/PKB phosphorylation following heparanase addition. These results suggest that lipid raft-resident receptor mediates heparanase signaling.     

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes from human heparanase can elicit a potent anti-tumor immune response in mice

Heparanase is expressed in almost all advanced tumors, and therefore it may serve as a potential target for tumor therapy. Our previous study has shown that heparanase can serve as a potential universal tumor-associated antigen (TAA) for the immunotherapy of advanced tumors. Further study demonstrated that the HLA-A*0201-restricted Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) epitopes Hpa525 (PAFSYSFFV), Hpa277 (KMLKSFLKA) and Hpa405 (WLSLLFKKL) from human heparanase could induce a potent anti-tumor immune response in vitro. The present study was designed to investigate whether the above peptides could induce immune responses in mice. Our results demonstrated that the effectors from heparanase peptide-immunized mice could effectively lyse various tumor cells that were heparanase positive and HLA-A*0201 matched. We also found that these peptide-specific CTLs did not lyse autologous lymphocytes that had low heparanase activity. Further study revealed that Hpa525, Hpa277, and Hpa405 peptides increased the frequency of IFN-γ-producing T cells as compared to a negative peptide. These results suggest that Hpa525, Hpa277, and Hpa405 peptides are novel HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitopes capable of inducing heparanase-specific CTLs in mice. Because heparanase is expressed in most advanced malignant tumors, Hpa525, Hpa277, and Hpa405 peptide-based vaccines may be useful for the immunotherapy of patients with advanced tumors.     

Nonviral gene transfer into primary cultures of human and porcine mesothelial cells

Due to their abundance and accessibility, mesothelial cells may be suitable tools for recombinant reagent expression by gene transfer. Genetically modified porcine mesothelial cells (PMCs) may have the potential for the treatment of vascular diseases in humans. We studied the effect of various transfection reagents on the primary culture of PMCs and human mesothelial cells (HMCs). The cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding a reporter gene (luciferase or green fluorescent protein [GFP]) under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter. Transfection was achieved using cationic lipids (DOSPER and DOTAP) or calcium phosphate/deoxyribonucleic acid coprecipitation or Fugene 6. Results showed that Fugene 6 was the most efficient and reproducible transfection reagent with both PMCs and HMCs. With Fugene 6, luciferase activity in PMCs (1.5 x 10(8) relative light units [RLU]/10(6) cells) was at least 2.5-fold higher than with the other transfection reagents, and it was 100-fold higher than in HMCs. However, the proportion of transfected cells expressing GFP was only 1%. These preliminary findings open up new avenues for developing experimental studies on the use of genetically modified PMCs.     

Manual and automated AgNOR count in differentiating reactive mesothelial from metastatic malignant cells in serous effusions

OBJECTIVE: To distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant cells in serous effusions using manual and automated methods of enumeration of argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs). STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study, 38 samples of benign (19 cases) and malignant (19 cases) serous effusions were included. AgNOR stain was used in each case along with routine Papanicolaou stain. The smears were examined under an oil immersion objective, and AgNOR dots were counted by direct observation independently by 2 observers. Automated AgNOR counting and morphometry were performed with a Quantimet 600 image cytometer (Leica, Cambridge, England). At least 100 cells were counted in each case. The number of AgNOR dots in individual cells, AgNOR area, nuclear area, AgNOR vs. nuclear area and nuclear perimeter were measured. Data on benign and malignant cells were compared. RESULTS: The AgNOR dots were discrete and smaller in benign effusion cases as compared to coarse and aggregated in malignant effusion cases. In benign reactive effusion cases the mean number of AgNOR dots per nucleus was 2.33 +/- 0.71 and 2.83 +/- 1.15 by the manual and automated method, respectively, whereas that for malignant effusion cases was 7.48 +/- 2.51 and 8.09 +/- 1.69 by the manual and automated method, respectively. Mean total AgNOR areas in benign and malignant groups were 4.77 +/- 2.66 microns 2 and 38.22 +/- 13.71 microns 2, respectively. Mean nuclear area, nuclear perimeter and ratio of AgNORs vs. nuclear area were 48.72 +/- 19.30 microns 2, 24.68 +/- 10.25 microns and .098 in benign effusion cases as compared to 174.25 +/- 82.36 microns 2, 69.03 +/- 27.23 microns and 0.22 in malignant effusion samples. All these values were significantly higher (P < .001, Student's t test) in malignant cells as compared to benign reactive cells. CONCLUSION: AgNOR dot enumeration, AgNOR area and ratio of AgNORs to nuclear area are valuable adjuncts to cytomorphology in differentiating reactive mesothelial cells from malignant cells in serous effusions. Automated AgNOR counting is rapid and less cumbersome.     

Ultrastructure of pleural mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma in malignant effusions as compared with reactive mesothelial cells.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ultrastructural features of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma cells in cytologic specimens from pleural effusions. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively studied 35 pleural effusions: 12 diffuse malignant pleural mesotheliomas (8 epithelial type, 4 biphasic type), 12 pulmonary adenocarcinomas and 11 cases of reactive mesothelial cells. RESULTS: In the cytoplasm, reactive and malignant mesothelial cells had more-abundant intermediate filaments (P < .05, P < .01) and fewer free ribosomes (P < .001, P < .001) than adenocarcinoma cells. Reactive mesothelial cells had fewer mitochondria than mesothelioma cells (P < .05). Mesothelioma cells had longer, thinner microvilli on the cell surfaces (P < .001); length/diameter ratios of microvilli were 19.1 +/- 7.0 (mesothelioma) vs. 9.1 +/- 2.2 (adenocarcinoma) and 9.2 +/- 2.4 (mesothelial cells). Giant intercellular junctions (desmosomes or desmosomelike structures > 1 micron in length) were found in eight cases of mesothelioma. Core filaments or rootlets in microvilli were present in two cases of adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Because cytologic specimens from pleural effusions were easy to obtain, we think ultrastructural cytology is useful in distinguishing mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma and benign effusions.     

Cytopathology of malignant mesothelioma. Reappraisal of the diagnostic value of collagen cores

The identification of malignant mesothelial cells in cytological smears prepared from serous effusions is still hampered by the lack of features specific for mesothelial differentiation. We examined the diagnostic value of collagen cores within clusters of tumour cells in cytological smears prepared from effusions from 43 patients with malignant mesothelioma and of 62 cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma. In Giemsa-stained smears collagen cores were detected in 51% of the cases of malignant mesothelioma and in none of the smears with metastatic adenocarcinoma. Using the Azan stain, collagen cores were detected in 64% of the malignant mesotheliomas and 4% of the adenocarcinomas. Immunoelectron microscopy demonstrated that the collagen cores are largely composed of collagen type III fibrils and some elastin embedded in a homogenous extracellular matrix. It can be concluded that the presence of collagen cores within clusters of tumour cells is highly suggestive of mesothelial differentiation and a common finding in malignant mesothelioma.     

Culture of epithelial cells from the rat pleura

Summary Cells obtained by tryptic digestion of the surface of intact adult and fetal Fischer 344 lungs were plated on glass fragments. Epithelial cell lines were readily established by selecting fragments with 2 to 10 cells 2 days after plating and growing them in F12 K media containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). These cell lines and new lines that can be easily obtained provide a reliable source of diploid, density-inhibited epithelial cells. These cells of mesothelial origin may serve as models for the study of mesothelial cells in situ. This work was supported through National Institutes of Health Grant HL-19737 from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare.     

Microdissection, mRNA amplification and microarray: a study of pleural mesothelial and malignant mesothelioma cells

The studies of molecular alterations in tumor cells with microarrays are often hampered by inherent tissue heterogeneity. The emergence of Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) allowed us to overcome this challenge since it gives selective access to cancer cells that are isolated from their native tissue environment. In this report, we microdissected mesothelial cells and malignant mesothelioma cells of ex vivo resected specimens using LCM. Amplified RNA from mesothelial and mesothelioma microdissected cells allowed us to measure global gene expression with 10 K-microarrays in four independent experiments. We screened 9850 annotated human genes, 1275 of which have satisfied our data analysis requirements. They included 302 overexpressed genes and 160 downregulated genes in mesothelioma microdissected cells as compared to mesothelial microdissected cells. Among them, the expression levels of eight genes, namely BF, FTL, IGFBP7, RARRES1, RARRES2, RBP1, SAT, and TXN according to HUGO nomenclature, were increased, whereas six: ALOX5AP, CLNS1A, EIF4A2, ELK3, REQ and SYPL, were found to be underexpressed in mesothelioma microdissected cells. The ferritin light polypeptide (FTL) gene overexpression was confirmed by real time quantitative PCR. Our approach allowed a comprehensive in situ examination of mesothelioma and provided an accurate way to find new marker genes that may be useful for diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.