Integration host factor increases the transpositional immunity conferred by gamma delta ends.

The ends of the bacterial transposon gamma delta contain adjacent binding sites for gamma delta transposase and integration host factor (IHF). IHF+ and IHF- strains were used in conjunction with gamma delta transposon ends containing or lacking the site for IHF binding to determine the role that IHF plays in various gamma delta-mediated transposition events. IHF was not essential for the transposition of gamma delta and seemed to decrease its frequency of transposition about threefold. IHF played no role in determining the distribution of gamma delta inserts into a target replicon, nor did it significantly alter the frequency of simple transpositions. The only clear role discerned for IHF and the terminal IHF-binding sites was in transposition immunity. IHF stimulated the immunity of those plasmids that contain an end of gamma delta, provided the end included the terminal IHF-binding site. For both ends, the degree of stimulation of immunity was similar to the stimulation of binding of transposase by IHF.     

Gamma delta transposase. Purification and analysis of its interaction with a transposon end.

gamma delta, a member of the Tn3 family of prokaryotic transposons, encodes a transposase that binds to the 35-base pair (bp) terminal inverted repeats (IRs) which define the transposing DNA segment. The gamma delta transposase has been overexpressed, identified by molecular weight determination and by immunoblotting, and purified to homogeneity. Production of soluble transposase required the presence of Mg2+ prior to cell lysis. Fractions from a Sephacryl S-300 column contained levels of IR-binding activity that parallel the concentration of transposase, indicating that transposase alone is sufficient for binding to the ends of gamma delta. Hydroxyl radical footprinting indicated that transposase binds to one face of the DNA helix. The protected region extends across the IR and up to 17 bp into the flanking DNA. Integration host factor (IHF), which binds adjacent to transposase, also protects one face of the DNA helix and is shifted about 70 degrees around the helical axis from the transposase protection. Analysis of transposase-DNA complexes by electrophoresis on nondenaturing gels indicated that three complexes, two within the gel and one trapped at the well, result from specific interactions with the IR. The complex in the well and one complex in the gel were analyzed by methylation interference experiments. The results indicate that transposase interacts with specific base pairs between positions 10 and 37 of the IR, a region encompassing three consecutive major and minor grooves. Methylated bases at the very end of the transposon (positions 1-9) and in the flanking DNA did not inhibit transposase binding. Thus, although transposase seems to be in intimate contact throughout the IR of gamma delta and 17 bp of flanking DNA, specific base pair recognition needed for binding appears to be determined by the inner three-quarters of the IR.     

Uncoupling of transpositional immunity from gamma delta transposition by a mutation at the end of gamma delta.

The transposon gamma delta, in common with other members of the Tn3 family, confers transpositional immunity, a phenomenon by which plasmids containing a single transposon end show reduced activity as targets for further insertion by the same element. We found that a copy of a mutant delta end, in which the two terminal base pairs (5' GG) were substituted with cytosines, conferred the same degree of immunity as the unaltered delta end. However, a transposon analog with the mutant delta end as its termini could not transpose. These results suggest that the binding of transposase to a site on a target replicon is sufficient to confer immunity and that immunity does not involve subsequent DNA transactions at the bound target site, analogous to the catalytic processes that occur at the transposon ends during transposition.     

Two domains in the terminal inverted-repeat sequence of transposon Tn3

Tn3 and related transposons have terminal inverted repeats (IR) of about 38 bp that are needed as sites for transposition. We made mini-Tn3 derivatives which had a wild-type IR of Tn3 at one end and either the divergent IR of the Tn3-related transposon, gamma delta or IS101, or a mutant IR of Tn3 at the other end. We then examined both in vivo transposition (cointegration between transposition donor and target molecules) of these mini-Tn3 elements and in vitro binding of Tn3-encoded transposase to their IRs. None of the elements with an IR of gamma delta or IS101 mediated cointegration efficiently. This was due to inefficient binding of transposase to these IR. Most mutant IR also interfered with cointegration, even though transposase bound to some mutant IR as efficiently as it did to wild type. This permitted the Tn3 IR sequence to be divided into two domains, named A and B, with respect to transposase binding. Domain B, at positions 13-38, was involved in transposase binding, whereas domain A, at positions 1-10, was not. The A domain may contain the sequence recognized by some other (e.g., host) factor(s) to precede the actual cointegration event.     

Cyclic changes in the affinity of protein-DNA interactions drive the progression and regulate the outcome of the Tn10 transposition reaction

The Tn10 transpososome is a DNA processing machine in which two transposon ends, a transposase dimer and the host protein integration host factor (IHF), are united in an asymmetrical complex. The transitions that occur during one transposition cycle are not limited to chemical cleavage events at the transposon ends, but also involve a reorganization of the protein and DNA components. Here, we demonstrate multiple pathways for Tn10 transposition. We show that one series of events is favored over all others and involves cyclic changes in the affinity of IHF for its binding site. During transpososome assembly, IHF is bound with high affinity. However, the affinity for IHF drops dramatically after cleavage of the first transposon end, leading to IHF ejection and unfolding of the complex. The ejection of IHF promotes cleavage of the second end, which is followed by restoration of the high affinity state which in turn regulates target interactions.     

The m gamma delta-1 element, a small gamma delta (Tn1000) derivative useful for plasmid mutagenesis, allele replacement and DNA sequencing.

Transposon gamma delta (Tn1000), a 6-kb member of the Tn3 family, is widely used for plasmid mutagenesis. A 1.8-kb derivative of gamma delta was constructed that contains the kan gene from Tn5 and the resolution (res) site from gamma delta cloned between 40-bp inverted repeats of gamma delta's delta (delta) end. This element, named m gamma delta-1, lacks the genes encoding transposase and resolvase, and therefore depends on its host to supply transposition and resolution functions. Thus, in strains lacking gamma delta, m gamma delta-1 will not transpose. The m gamma delta-1 element is shown to be useful for mutagenesis of plasmids, DNA sequencing, and allele replacement (in Streptomyces avermitilis).     

IHF is the limiting host factor in transposition of Pseudomonas putida transposon Tn4652 in stationary phase

Transpositional activity of mobile elements is not constant. Conditional regulation of host factors involved in transposition may severely change the activity of mobile elements. We have demonstrated previously that transposition of Tn4652 in Pseudomonas putida is a stationary phase-specific event, which requires functional sigma S (Ilves et al., 2001, J Bacteriol 183: 5445-5448). We hypothesized that integration host factor (IHF), the concentration of which is increased in starving P. putida, might contribute to the transposition of Tn4652 as well. Here, we demonstrate that transposition of Tn4652 in stationary phase P. putida is essentially limited by the amount of IHF. No transposition of Tn4652 occurs in a P. putida ihfA-defective strain. Moreover, overexpression of IHF results in significant enhancement of transposition compared with the wild-type strain. This indicates that the amount of IHF is a bottleneck in Tn4652 transposition. Gel mobility shift and DNase I footprinting studies revealed that IHF is necessary for the binding of transposase to both transposon ends. In vitro, transposase can bind to inverted repeats of transposon only after the binding of IHF. The results obtained in this study indicate that, besides sigma S, IHF is another host factor that is implicated in the elevation of transposition in stationary phase.     

H-NS binds with high affinity to the Tn10 transpososome and promotes transpososome stabilization

H-NS is a bacterial DNA-binding protein that regulates gene expression and DNA transposition. In the case of Tn10, H-NS binds directly to the transposition machinery (i.e. the transpososome) to influence the outcome of the reaction. In the current work we evaluated the binding affinity of H-NS for two forms of the Tn10 transpososome, including the initial folded form and a pre-unfolded form. These two forms differ in that IHF is bound to the former but not the latter. IHF binding induces a bend (or fold) in the transposon end that facilitates transpososome formation. However, the continued presence of IHF in the transpososome inhibits intermolecular transposition events. We show that H-NS binds particularly strongly to the pre-unfolded transpososome with an apparent K_d of ∼0.3 nM. This represents the highest affinity interaction between H-NS and a binding partner documented to date. We also show that binding of H-NS to the transpososome stabilizes this structure and propose that both high-affinity binding and stabilization result from the combined interaction between H-NS and DNA and H-NS and transposase within the transpososome. Mechanistic implications for tight binding of H-NS to the transpososome and transpososome stabilization are considered.     

The integration host factor of Escherichia coli binds to bent DNA at the origin of replication of the plasmid pSC101

The integration host factor (IHF) of Escherichia coli is necessary for maintenance of pSC101. The protein binds specifically to the replication origin of the plasmid, in the AT-rich region located immediately adjacent to the left, weak binding site for the plasmid-encoded initiator protein. DNAase I and OH- radical footprinting experiments showed that IHF protects 49 bp of the DNA at the origin region. Methylation protection analyses revealed that IHF contacts purine residues in both the major and minor grooves of the DNA. Electrophoretic analyses showed that IHF binds to bent DNA, and the protein binding further enhances the degree of DNA bending. Site-directed mutagenesis of three of the contact points not only abolished binding of the protein to the DNA but also inactivated the replication origin. Therefore, binding of IHF to the ori sequence most probably is necessary for initiation of plasmid replication.     

Mutations in the inverted repeats of Tn3 affect binding of transposase and transposition immunity.

In order to better understand the interaction between the inverted repeats (IRs) of the transposon Tn3 and Tn3 transposase, we have looked at the effects of mutations within the IRs on binding of transposase and transposition immunity. Binding of transposase to mutated IRs was measured using a site-specific nitrocellulose filter binding assay and by DNase I protection studies. Transposition immunity was measured in vivo using a transposition mating-out assay. The most important determinants for binding of transposase are present within the inside 21 base-pairs of the IR and several single base-pair mutations significantly reduce binding. Base-pair mutations which do not effect binding have strong negative effects on transposition immunity indicating that simple binding of transposase to the IR is not sufficient for the establishment of transposition immunity.     

Maize Activator transposase has a bipartite DNA binding domain that recognizes subterminal sequences and the terminal inverted repeats

The mobility of maize transposable element Activator (Ac) is dependent on the 11-bp terminal inverted repeats (IRs) and approximately 250 subterminal nucleotides at each end. These sequences flank the coding region for the transposase (TPase) protein, which is required for the transposition reaction. Here we show that Ac TPase has a bipartite DNA binding domain, and recognizes the IRs and subterminal sequences in the Ac ends. TPase binds cooperatively to repetitive ACG and TCG sequences, of which 25 copies are found in the 5′ and 20 copies in the 3′ subterminal regions. TPase affinity is highest when these sites are flanked on the 3′ side by an additional G residue (A/TCGG), which is found at 75% of binding sites. Moreover, TPase binds specifically to the Ac IRs, albeit with much lower affinity. Two mutations within the IRs that immobilize Ac abolish TPase binding completely. The basic DNA binding domain of TPase is split into two subdomains. Binding to the subterminal motifs is accomplished by the C-terminal subdomain alone, whereas recognition of the IRs requires the N-terminal subdomain in addition. Furthermore, TPase is extremely flexible in DNA binding. Two direct or inverted binding sites are bound equally well, and sites that are five to twelve bases apart are similarly well bound. The consequences of these findings for the Ac transposition reaction are discussed.     

An ATP-ADP switch in MuB controls progression of the Mu transposition pathway.

MuB protein, an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein, collaborates with Mu transposase to promote efficient transposition. MuB binds target DNA, delivers this target DNA segment to transposase and activates transposase''s catalytic functions. Using ATP-bound, ADP-bound and ATPase-defective MuB proteins we investigated how nucleotide binding and hydrolysis control the activities of MuB protein, important for transposition. We found that both MuB-ADP and MuB-ATP stimulate transposase, whereas only MuB-ATP binds with high affinity to DNA. Four different ATPase-defective MuB mutants fail to activate the normal transposition pathway, further indicating that ATP plays critical regulatory roles during transposition. These mutant proteins fall into two classes: class I mutants are defective in target DNA binding, whereas class II mutants bind target DNA, deliver it to transposase, but fail to promote recombination with this DNA. Based on these studies, we propose that the switch from the ATP- to ADP-bound form allows MuB to release the target DNA while maintaining its stimulatory interaction with transposase. Thus, ATP-hydrolysis by MuB appears to function as a molecular switch controlling how target DNA is delivered to the core transposition machinery.     

The positive and negative regulation of Tn10 transposition by IHF is mediated by structurally asymmetric transposon arms

The Tn10 transpososome has symmetrical components on either side: there are two transposon ends each of which has binding sites for a monomer of transposase and an IHF heterodimer. The DNA bending activity of IHF stimulates assembly of an intermediate with tightly folded transposon ends in which transposase has additional ‘subterminal’ DNA contacts, located distal to the IHF site. These subterminal contacts are required to activate later steps in the reaction. Quantitative hydroxyl radical footprinting and gel retardation unfolding experiments show that the transpososome is fundamentally asymmetric, despite having identical components on either side. Major differences between the transposon ends define α and β sides of the complex. IHF can dissociate from the transposon arm on the β side of the complex in the absence of metal ion. However, IHF is locked onto the α side of the complex, probably by the subterminal transposase contacts, until released by a metal ion-dependent conformational change. Later in the reaction, IHF inhibits target interactions. Using a very short transposon arm, target interactions are demonstrated at a saturating IHF concentration. This suggests that inhibition of target interactions is due to steric hindrance of the target binding site by a single IHF-folded transposon arm.     

Maize Activator transposase has a bipartite DNA binding domain that recognizes subterminal sequences and the terminal inverted repeats

 The mobility of maize transposable element Activator (Ac) is dependent on the 11-bp terminal inverted repeats (IRs) and approximately 250 subterminal nucleotides at each end. These sequences flank the coding region for the transposase (TPase) protein, which is required for the transposition reaction. Here we show that Ac TPase has a bipartite DNA binding domain, and recognizes the IRs and subterminal sequences in the Ac ends. TPase binds cooperatively to repetitive ACG and TCG sequences, of which 25 copies are found in the 5′ and 20 copies in the 3′ subterminal regions. TPase affinity is highest when these sites are flanked on the 3′ side by an additional G residue (A/TCGG), which is found at 75% of binding sites. Moreover, TPase binds specifically to the Ac IRs, albeit with much lower affinity. Two mutations within the IRs that immobilize Ac abolish TPase binding completely. The basic DNA binding domain of TPase is split into two subdomains. Binding to the subterminal motifs is accomplished by the C-terminal subdomain alone, whereas recognition of the IRs requires the N-terminal subdomain in addition. Furthermore, TPase is extremely flexible in DNA binding. Two direct or inverted binding sites are bound equally well, and sites that are five to twelve bases apart are similarly well bound. The consequences of these findings for the Ac transposition reaction are discussed. Received: 3 June 1996 / Accepted: 29 July 1996     

Functional organization of the ends of IS 1: specific binding site for an IS1-encoded protein

The IS 1-encoded protein InsA binds specifically to both ends of IS1, and acts as a repressor of IS1 gene expression and may be a direct inhibitor of the transposition process. We show here, using DNasel 'foot-printing' and gel retardation, that the InsA binding sites are located within the 24/25 bp minimal active ends of IS1 and that InsA induces DNA bending upon binding. Conformational modification of the ends of IS1 as a result of binding of the host protein integration host factor (IHF) to its site within the minimal ends has been previously observed. Using a collection of synthetic mutant ends we have mapped some of the nucleotide sequence requirements for InsA binding and for transposition activity. We show that sequences necessary for InsA binding are also essential for transposition activity. We demonstrate that InsA and IHF binding sites overlap since some sequence determinants are shared by both InsA and IHF. The data suggest that these ends contain two functional domains: one for binding of InsA and IHF, and the other for transposition activity. A third region, when present, may enhance transposition activity with an intact right end. This 'architecture' of the ends of IS1 is remarkably similar to that of IS elements IS10, IS50 and IS903.     

The 43 residue DNA binding domain of gamma delta resolvase binds adjacent major and minor grooves of DNA.

The carboxyl-terminal domain of gamma delta resolvase binds to each half of the three resolvase binding sites that constitute the recombination site, res. Ethylation inhibition experiments show that the phosphate contacts made by the C-terminal DNA binding domain are similar to those made by intact resolvase, with the exception of a single phosphate at the inside end of each contact region which is contacted solely by the intact resolvase. The DNA binding domain makes essentially identical contacts to all 6 half sites, whereas the intact resolvase makes slightly different contacts to each binding site. Despite its small size, only 43 amino acid residues, the resolvase C-terminal domain interacts with an unusually large segment of DNA. Phosphate contacts extend across an adjacent major and minor groove of DNA and about one third of the circumference around the helix. The minimal binding segment, determined experimentally, is a 12 bp sequence that includes the 9 base pair inverted repeat (common to all half sites), the adjacent 3 base pairs (towards the center of the intact resolvase binding site), and phosphates at both ends.