Cerebral activation to intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimulation

Although numerous functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) studies have been performed on the processing of olfactory information, the intranasal trigeminal system so far has not received much attention. In the present study, we sought to delineate the neural correlates of trigeminal stimulation using carbon dioxide (CO(2)) presented to the left or right nostril. Fifteen right-handed men underwent FMRI using single runs of 3 conditions (CO(2) in the right and the left nostrils and an olfactory stimulant-phenyl ethyl alcohol-in the right nostril). As expected, olfactory activations were located in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), amygdala, and rostral insula. For trigeminal stimulation, activations were found in "trigeminal" and "olfactory" regions including the pre- and postcentral gyrus, the cerebellum, the ventrolateral thalamus, the insula, the contralateral piriform cortex, and the OFC. Left compared with right side stimulations resulted in stronger cerebellar and brain stem activations; right versus left stimulation resulted in stronger activations of the superior temporal sulcus and OFC. These results suggest a trigeminal processing system that taps into similar cortical regions and yet is separate from that of the olfactory system. The overlapping pattern of cortical activation for trigeminal and olfactory stimuli is assumed to be due to the intimate connections in the processing of information from the 2 major intranasal chemosensory systems.     

Fear-like behavioral responses in mice in different odorant environments: Trigeminal versus olfactory mediation under low doses

Odors can have repulsive effects on rodents based on two complementary adaptive behaviors: the avoidance of predator odors (potentially dangerous) and the avoidance of trigeminal stimulants (potentially noxious). The present study aimed to compare the behavioral effects on mice of odors according to their trigeminal properties and ecological significance. We used three different odors: 2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline (TMT: a fox feces odor frequently used to elicit fear-induced behaviors), toluene (a strong stimulant of the trigeminal system) and phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA: a selective stimulant of the olfactory system). First, we checked preference and avoidance behaviors in mice with and without anosmia towards these odors to ensure their olfactory/trigeminal properties. Secondly, we used a standard test (open-field and elevated plus-maze) to assess the behaviors of mice when exposed to these odors. The results show that the anosmic and control mice both avoided TMT and toluene odors. In the open-field and the elevated plus-maze, mice exhibited "anxious" behaviors when exposed to TMT. Conversely, exposure to PEA induced "anxiolytic" effects confirmed by low blood corticosterone levels resulting from completion of the elevated plus-maze. Compared with TMT exposure, toluene exposure induced moderate "anxious" effects.     

fMRI activation in response to odorants orally delivered in aqueous solutions

During food intake flavor perception results from simultaneous stimulation of the gustatory, olfactory and trigeminal systems. Olfactory stimulation occurs mainly through the retronasal pathway and the resulting perception is often interpreted as a taste perception, thus leading to the well-known sensory confusion between taste and olfaction. The present experiment was designed to study, with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the cortical representation of olfactory perception in humans in response to retronasal stimulation by odorants delivered in aqueous solution. Psychophysical evaluation confirmed that the stimuli acted as pure olfactory stimuli through the retronasal pathway and did not present any taste component. Results showed activation in all brain regions previously described with neuroimaging techniques using olfactory stimulation with an odorized air flow. Piriform and orbitofrontal cortex were found activated as well as the hippocampal region, the amygdala, the insular lobe, the cingulate gyrus and the cerebellum. These results demonstrate the feasibility of efficiently stimulating the olfactory system in an fMRI scanner through the retronasal pathway with liquids delivered to the oral cavity. The presentation of olfactory stimuli in liquids to the mouth is a realistic model for the study of food-related flavor perception. This stimulation protocol furthermore allows presenting taste and olfactory stimuli separately or combined, thus allowing for direct comparisons between single modality representation, taste or olfaction, and representation of multi-modality mixtures.     

Sniff magnitude test: relationship to odor identification, detection, and memory tests in a clinic population

Recently a novel measure of olfactory function, the Sniff Magnitude Test (SMT), was developed that relies on changes in inhalation in response to an odor. The relationship of this unique test to that of other olfactory tests has received little investigation. In this study, we assessed, in 132 patients presenting to a chemosensory disorders clinic, the relationship of SMT scores to those from 3 standardized psychophysical tests: the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), a phenyl ethyl alcohol odor detection threshold test, and a short-term odor memory/discrimination test. SMT scores were roughly related to olfactory dysfunction categories defined for the UPSIT and correlated moderately with the other tests. Malodors (1% and 3% methylthiobutyrate [MTB], 1% ethyl 3-mercaptoproprionate) exhibited stronger correlations than nonmalodors (3% phenyl ethyl alcohol [PEA], 3% amyl acetate, 3% n-butanol) and elicited greater sniff suppression. In a principal component analysis, the SMT measures loaded on components different from those of the other tests, which loaded on a separate component. Anticipatory responses (i.e., smaller sniffs) occurred across trials for the first malodor (1% MTB), but not for the first nonmalodor (3% PEA), that was encountered. These results, along with those of an earlier factor analysis, suggest that sniff magnitude is influenced by odorant quality and intensity, as well as by cognitive factors.     

Trigeminal chemoreception in the nasal and oral cavities

Nasal and oral trigeminal chemoreception are discussed witha focus on their functions, responses, and interactions witholfaction and gustation. Trigeminal stimulation elicits a numberof physiological reflexes which are shown to have several possibleeffects on the olfactory and gustatory systems. Based on psychophysicaland electrophysiological data, it is argued that trigeminalchemoreceptors may be stimulated by a wider range of compoundsand concentrations than is generally believed. The molecularstructures which tend to characterize effective trigeminal stimuliare also discussed. It is suggested that the evidence for thediscriminatory ability of trigeminal chemoreceptors is inconclusiveand that this remains a fundamental unanswered question. Finally,the interesting phenomenon of human preference for some initiallyaversive trigeminal stimuli is reviewed. ¹ Present address: Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 MarketStreet, Philadelphia, PA 19104. USA.     

Stimulus selection for intranasal sensory isolation: eugenol is an irritant

Both the olfactory and the trigeminal systems are able to respond to intranasal presentations of chemical vapor. Accordingly, when the nose detects a volatile chemical, it is often unclear whether we smell it, feel it, or both. The distinction may often be unimportant in our everyday perception of fragrances or aromas, but it can matter in experiments that purport to isolate olfactory processes or study the interaction between olfaction and chemesthesis. Researchers turn to a small pool of compounds that are believed to be "pure olfactory" stimuli with little or no trigeminal impact. The current report reexamines one such commonly used compound, namely eugenol, a flavor and fragrance ingredient that has anesthetic properties under some conditions. Using a standard method involving many trials during an experimental session (Experiment 1), subjects were unable to reliably lateralize eugenol, consistent with claims that this compound is detected primarily through olfaction. However, with more limited exposure (Experiments 2 and 3), subjects were able to lateralize eugenol. We speculate that anesthetic properties of eugenol could blunt its trigeminal impact in some paradigms. Regardless, the current experiments suggest that eugenol can in fact stimulate the trigeminal nerve but in a complex concentration-dependent manner. Implications and strategies for selection of model odorants are discussed.     

Peripheral and central alterations of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-like immunoreactivity in the rat in response to activation of the trigeminovascular system

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) is present in the cranial arteries and trigeminal sensory neurons. We therefore examined the alterations in PACAP-like immunoreactivity (PACAP-LI) in a time-dependent manner in two rat models of trigeminovascular system (TS) activation. In one group chemical stimulation (CS) was performed with i.p. nitroglycerol (NTG), and in the other one the trigeminal ganglia (TRG) were subjected to electrical stimulation (ES). The two biologically active forms, PACAP-38 and PACAP-27, were determined by means of radioimmunoassay (RIA) and mass spectrometry (MS) in the plasma, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC), the spinal cord (SC) and the TRG. The tissue concentrations of PACAP-27 were 10 times lower than those of PACAP-38 in the TNC and SC, but about half in the TRG. PACAP-38, but not PACAP-27, was present in the plasma. Neither form could be identified in the CSF. PACAP-38-LI in the plasma, SC and TRG remained unchanged after CS, but it was increased significantly in the TNC 90 and 180 min after NTG injection. In response to ES of the TRG, the level of PACAP-38 in the plasma and the TNC was significantly elevated 90 and 180 min later, but not in the SC or the TRG. The alterations in the levels of PACAP-27 in the tissue homogenates in response to both forms of stimulation were identical to those of PACAP-38. The selective increases in both forms of PACAP in the TNC suggest its important role in the central sensitization involved in migraine-like headache.     

Differences in human evoked potentials related to olfactory or trigeminal chemosensory activation

The aim of the present study was to determine, whether there are differences in the topographical distribution of chemosensory evoked potentials (CSEPs) due to stimulation with different odous substances. The odorants used in the study which mainly excited the olfactory nerve were vanillin and acetaldehyde; those which additionally excited the trigeminal nerve were sulphur dioxide and ammonia. Twelve subjects participated in the study. The subjects separately estimated the intensity of the odorous and of the painful/pricking sensation caused by the stimuli, and described the odorous qualities in their own words. CSEPs were recorded from 7 positions.After stimulation with “olfactory” subsances maximum CSEP amplitudes were recorded at parietol-central sites, and after stimulation with “trigeminal” substances maximum amplitudes were obtained at the vertex. Following stimulation with ammonia and sulphur dioxide amplitudes were largest contralateral to the stimulated nostril. In contrast, little difference in CSEP amplitudes was observed between hemispheres after stimulation with vanillin or acetyldehyde.Thus, the topographical distribution of CSEP amplitudes may provide information with regard to the sensory system (olfactory or trigeminal) activated by the presentation of an odorous stimulus.     

On the trigeminal percept of androstenone and its implications on the rate of specific anosmia

Specific anosmia is a term that describes an inability to perceive a particular odorant in the context of an otherwise normal olfactory acuity. The most common example, for the odor of androstenone, has been ascribed a prevalence ranging from 2 to 45%. In two experiments we sought to determine whether this wide range could be explained by the difference in steroid concentrations used, and by the degree to which the trigeminal system contributes to perception of androstenone. Experiment 1 demonstrated that high concentrations of androstenone stimulated the trigeminal system, as indicated by electrophysiological recordings. Experiment 2 demonstrated that conscious detection of androstenone is possible based solely on the trigeminal system. Interestingly, detection seems to interact with olfactory acuity in that subjects with a low olfactory sensitivity to androstenone were better able to detect its trigeminal component. The agreement between conscious experience and behavioral discrimination was not well calibrated, in that subjects demonstrated a clear overconfidence in their abilities. Altogether, the current study suggests that androstenone is an odorant that produces a concentration-dependent degree of trigeminal stimulation. This trigeminal component explains the diversity of the reported prevalence of specific anosmia for androstenone and might have implications on future use of specific anosmia as a tool to understand odor processing.     

Olfactory Evoked Potential Produced by Electrical Stimulation of the Human Olfactory Mucosa

Most physiological studies of the human olfactory system haveconcentrated on the cortical level; the olfactory bulbar levelhas been studied rarely. We attempted to stimulate the humanolfactory mucosa by electrical pulse to detect the bulbar potentials.Electrical stimulation (2 mA, 0.5 ms) of the human olfactorymucosa evoked a change in potential recorded from the frontalsector of the head. A negative peak of the evoked potentialthat occurred at 19.4 ms (grand means, n = 5) after stimulationwas the clearest. The highest amplitude of the potential wasrecorded from the frontal sector of the head on the stimulatedside. Our findings were similar to the experimental resultsobtained from the olfactory bulbs of animals. This evoked potentialwas considered to be the human olfactory bulbar potential. Whenthe subjects were stimulated by applying electricity to theolfactory mucosa, no sensation of smell occurred even thoughevoked potentials were recorded. Evoked potentials were recordedonly when the stimulating electrode was located in the olfactorycleft. When the stimulating electrode was outside the olfactorycleft, the stimulation caused pain. The trigeminal nerve seemedto be stimulated by electricity. Olfactory evoked potentialsproduced by the electrical stimulation of the human olfactorymucosa should aid the research on human olfactory physiology,and may be applicable to clinical tests of olfactory dysfunction.Chem. Senses 22: 77–81, 1997.     

Male-specific,sex pheromone-selective projection neurons in the antennal lobes of the mothManduca sexta

A subset of olfactory projection neurons in the brain of male Manduca sexta is described, and their role in sex pheromone information processing is examined. These neurons have extensive arborizations in the macroglomerular complex (MGC), a distinctive and sexually dimorphic area of neuropil in the antennal lobe (AL), to which the axons of two known classes of antennal pheromone receptors project. Each projection neuron sends an axon from the AL into the protocerebrum. Forty-one projection neurons were characterized according to their responses to electrical stimulation of the antennal nerve as well as olfactory stimulation of antennal receptors. All neurons exhibited strong selectivity for female sex pheromones. Other behaviorally relevant odors, such as plant volatiles, had no obvious effect on the activity of these neurons. Two broad physiological categories were found: cells that were excited by stimulation of the ipsilateral antenna with pheromones (29 out of 41), and cells that received a mixed input (inhibition and excitation) from pheromone pathways (12 out of 41). Of the cells in the first category, 13 out of 29 were equally excited in response to stimulation of the antenna with either the principal natural pheromone (bombykal) or a mimic of a second unidentified pheromone ('C-15') and were similarly excited by the natural pheromone blend. The remaining 16 out of 29 cells responded selectively, and in some cases, in a dose-dependent manner, to stimulation of the antenna with bombykal or C-15, but not both. Some of these neurons had dendritic arborizations restricted to only a portion of the MGC neuropil, whereas most had arborizations throughout the MGC. Of the cells in the second category, 9 out of 12 were excited by bombykal, inhibited by C-15, and showed a mixed response to the natural pheromone blend. For the other 3 out of 12 cells, the response polarity was reversed for the two chemically-identified odors. Two additional neurons, which were not tested with olfactory stimuli, were tonically inhibited in response to electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral antennal nerve. These observations suggest that some of the male-specific projection neurons may signal general pheromone-triggered arousal, whereas a smaller number can actively integrate inputs from the two know receptor classes (Bal- and C-15-selective) and may operate as 'mixture detectors' at this level of the olfactory subsystem that processes information about sex pheromones.     

Endocannabinoids and related fatty acid amides,and their regulation,in the salivary glands of the lone star tick

The salivary glands and saliva from the lone star tick Amblyomma americanum (L.) were analyzed for the presence of the two endogenous agonists of cannabinoid receptors, N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), as well as of the anandamide congener, N-palmitoylethanolamine (PEA), an anti-inflammatory and analgesic mediator that is inactive at cannabinoid receptors. Two very sensitive mass-spectrometric techniques were used for this purpose. Both 2-AG and PEA, as well as other N-acylethanolamines (NAEs), were identified in salivary glands, but anandamide was below detection. The levels of 2-AG were considerably higher in the salivary glands of partially fed than replete females. Ex vivo gland stimulation with arachidonic acid increased the levels of 2-AG, but not of PEA or other NAEs, and caused the formation of anandamide and of the potent analgesic compound N-arachidonoylglycine. Instead, the amounts of anandamide, 2-AG and PEA were not influenced by treatment of salivary glands with dopamine, which stimulates saliva secretion. The possible biosynthetic precursors of anandamide, PEA and other NAEs were also detected in salivary glands, whereas only PEA was detected in tick saliva. These data demonstrate for the first time that the salivary glands of an obligate ectoparasite species can make endocannabinoids and/or related congeners with analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity, which possibly participate in the inhibition of the host defense reactions.     

Evidence for olfactory learning in procellariiform seabird chicks

Burrow nesting procellariiform seabirds use olfactory cues for both foraging and nest recognition. As chicks, burrow nesters develop in the dark, but are exposed to both prey‐related and individual‐specific scents through contact with their parents. This exposure suggests that chicks may have the opportunity to learn odours while still in the nest. In this study, we examined whether exposure to odourants during development might influence olfactory search behaviour expressed later in life. To test this idea, we exposed eggs of thin‐billed prions Pachyptila belcheri to a rosy‐scented novel odour (phenyl ethyl alcohol, PEA) or a control (water) just before hatching; chicks were then tested with these odours in a simple wind tunnel. Prior to fledging, subjects who had received pre‐exposure to PEA displayed head sweeps nearly twice as frequently as control birds did when presented with PEA. This study demonstrates that under natural rearing conditions, procellariiforms learn odour characteristics of their rearing environment in the nest.     

Distortion of olfactory perception: diagnosis and treatment

Clinically, olfaction can fail in any of three ways: (i) decreased sensitivity (hyposmia, anosmia) and two types of distortion (dysosmia); (ii) distorted quality of an odorant stimulation (troposmia); (iii) perceived odor when no odorant is present (phantosmia, hallucination). The distortions are usually much more upsetting to a person's quality of life than a simple loss. An ipsilatersal loss of olfactory sensitivity is often identified in the nostril with any type of olfactory distortion. The pathophysiology of a stimulated distortion (troposmia) is likely a decreased number of functioning olfactory primary neurons so that an incomplete characterization of the odorant is made. In phantosmia, two possible causations include an abnormal signal or inhibition from the primary olfactory neurons or peripheral olfactory or trigeminal signals that "trigger" a central process. The clinician's goal is to carefully define the problem (e.g. taste versus smell, real versus perceived, one versus two nostrils), to perform the appropriate examination and testing and to provide therapy if possible. Treatment includes assurance with no active therapy (because many of these will naturally resolve), topical medications, systemic medications, anesthesia to parts of the nose and, rarely, referral for surgical excision of olfactory neurons. Endoscopic transnasal operations have the advantage of treating phantosmia and sometimes allowing a return of olfactory ability after the operation.     

Nasal chemosensory-stimulation evoked activity patterns in the rat trigeminal ganglion visualized by in vivo voltage-sensitive dye imaging

Mammalian nasal chemosensation is predominantly mediated by two independent neuronal pathways, the olfactory and the trigeminal system. Within the early olfactory system, spatiotemporal responses of the olfactory bulb to various odorants have been mapped in great detail. In contrast, far less is known about the representation of volatile chemical stimuli at an early stage in the trigeminal system, the trigeminal ganglion (TG), which contains neurons directly projecting to the nasal cavity. We have established an in vivo preparation that allows high-resolution imaging of neuronal population activity from a large region of the rat TG using voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs). Application of different chemical stimuli to the nasal cavity elicited distinct, stimulus-category specific, spatiotemporal activation patterns that comprised activated as well as suppressed areas. Thus, our results provide the first direct insights into the spatial representation of nasal chemosensory information within the trigeminal ganglion imaged at high temporal resolution.     

Modulation of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and piriform cortex by physiologically meaningful olfactory cues in an olfactory association task

Animals were trained to discriminate two natural odors while another group was trained to discriminate between a patterned electrical stimulation distributed on the lateral olfactory tract (LOT), labelled olfaco-mimetic stimulation (OMS), used as an olfactory cue versus a natural odor. No statistically significant difference was observed in behavioral data between these two groups. The animals trained to learn the meaning of the OMS exhibited a gradual long-term potentiation (LTP) phenomenon in the piriform cortex. When a group of naive animals was pseudo-conditioned, giving the OMS for the same number of sessions but without any olfactory training, no LTP was recorded. These results indicate that the process of learning olfactory association gradually potentiates cortical synapses in a defined cortical terminal field, and may explain why LTP in the piriform cortex is not elicited by the patterned stimulation itself, but only in an associative context. As olfactory and hippocampus regions are connected via the lateral entorhinal cortex, the olfactomimetic model was used to study the dynamic of involvement of the dentate gyrus (DG) in learning and memory of this associative olfactory task. Polysynaptic field potentials, evoked by the LOT stimulation, were recorded in the molecular layer of the ipsilateral DG. An early and rapid (2nd session) potentiation was observed when a significant discrimination of the two cues began to be observed. The onset latency of the potentiated response was 30–40 ms. When a group of naive animals was pseudoconditioned, no change was observed. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that early activation of the DG during the learning of olfactory cue allows the progressive storage of olfactory information in a defined set of potentiated cortical synapses. The onset latency of the polysynaptic potentiated responses suggests the existence of a reactivating hippocampal loops during the processing of olfactory information.     

A comparison of the discriminatory ability and sensitivity of the trigeminal and olfactory systems to chemical stimuli in the tiger salamander

Summary Trigeminal receptors can respond to a wide variety of chemical stimuli, but it is unknown whether these receptors mediate discrimination between chemical stimuli matched for equal perceptual intensity. The present electrophysiological and behavioral experiments address this issue using tiger salamanders, Ambystoma tigrinum, and four compounds (amyl acetate, cyclohexanone, butanol, and d-limonene). In addition, the relative sensitivities of the trigeminaland olfactory systems to these compounds are compared. In electrophysiological cross-adaptation experiments (amyl acetate vs cyclohexanone; butanol vs d-limonene), there was complete cross adaptation such that only concentrations above the background (crossa-dapting) stimulus concentration elicited responses, suggesting that chemical stimuli may stimulate trigeminal receptors nonspecifically. In behavioral experiments (amyl acetate vs cyclohexanone; butanol vs d-limonene), only animals with intact olfactory nerves could discriminate between perceptually equivalent concentrations, that is concentrations that elicited the same level of responding. Both electrophysiologically and behaviorally, the trigeminal system exhibited higher thresholds than the olfactory system. We conclude that trigeminal chemoreceptors, at least in salamanders, are unable to discriminate between these two pairs of compounds when matched for equal perceptual intensity, and that trigeminal chemoreceptors are less sensitive than olfactory receptors.Abbreviations AA amyl acetate - CH cyclohexanone - LI d-limonene - BU butanol - EOG electro-olfactogram - ISI interstim-ulus interval - ONX olfactory nerve cut - ppm parts per million (1 l of compound in vapor phase/1l of air=1 ppm)     

Human responses to propionic acid. I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics

The objective of this study was to fully characterize normosmic perception of stimuli expected to cause widely varying degrees of olfactory and nasal trigeminal stimulation and to directly evaluate the possible role of olfactory nerve stimulation in nasal irritation sensitivity. During each of four identical test sessions, four anosmic and 31 normosmic participants were presented with a range of concentrations extending from peri-threshold for normosmics to supra- threshold for anosmics. For each session, odor (O) and nasal irritation (NI) sensitivities were summarized in terms of the concentrations required to produce four sensation levels ('iso-response' concentrations). Within-participant variation in these iso-response concentrations was < 10-fold for 95% of normosmics, for both O and NI. For O but not NI, these apparent fluctuations in sensitivity were largely accounted for by the uncertainty surrounding the iso-response concentrations calculated for each session. Anosmics exhibited minimal within- and between-participant variation in NI and required, for all but the highest perceptual level, a higher concentration than almost all normosmics. Between-participant variation, expressed in terms of 90% confidence interval widths, was approximately 0.5 log units for both O and NI for the highest perceptual level, but increased to approximately 0.8 and 1.8 log units, respectively, for the lowest (peri- threshold) level. Our findings suggest that: (i) most apparent variation over time in O sensitivity is actually a reflection of the uncertainty surrounding estimates of sensitivity obtained for each session; (ii) within- and between-participant variation in O sensitivity is far less than is commonly reported; and (iii) low to moderate levels of NI in normosmics are the result of relatively weak trigeminal stimulation combined with much greater olfactory activation.      

Peptidergic regulation of secretory activity in amphibian olfactory mucosa: Immunohistochemistry,neural stimulation,and pharmacology

Summary The role of substance P in the regulation of secretion from sustentacular cells, Bowman's glands and deep glands in the amphibian olfactory mucosa was investigated using immunohistochemical, electrophysiological, and pharmacological methods. Substance P-like immunoreactive varicose fibers extended through the olfactory epithelium, terminating at or near the surface. In addition, immunoreactive varicose fibers innervated Bowman's glands, deep glands, and blood vessels in the lamina propria. Innervation of Bowman's gland was sparse, with fibers terminating on basal acinar cell membranes; deep gland innervation was abundant, with fibers often extending between acinar cells almost to the lumen. Stimulation of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve resulted in slow potentials recorded at the surface of the olfactory epithelium. When the olfactory mucosae from trigeminal-stimulated animals were examined histologically, morphological signs of secretory activity were observed, suggesting that substance P was released from the trigeminal nerve terminals. Topical application of 10^-5 to 10^-3 mol substance P resulted in morphological signs of secretion that were very similar to those seen as a result of trigeminal stimulation. Thus, substance P released from trigeminal fibers may modulate secretory activity within the olfactory mucosa.