Membrane Binding by the Endophilin N-BAR Domain

The structure of the endophilin N-terminal amphipathic helix Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs-homology (N-BAR) domain is unique because of an additional insert helix under the arch of the N-BAR dimer. The structure of this additional helix has not been fully resolved in crystallographic studies, and thus presents a challenge to molecular-level analysis. Large-scale molecular-dynamics simulations were therefore employed to investigate the interaction of a single endophilin N-BAR with a lipid bilayer. Various possible configurations of the additional insert helix under the top of the arch of the endophilin N-BAR were modeled to examine their effect on membrane bending. A residue-residue and residue-lipid headgroup distance analysis, similar to that performed with electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, revealed that the insert helix remains perpendicular to the long axis of the N-BAR over the duration of the simulations. It was also found that the degree of membrane bending is directly related to the orientation of the additional insert helix, and that the perpendicular configuration generates the largest curvature consistent with mutation experiments. In addition, the angle formed between the two N-BAR monomers at the top of the arch is sensitive to the orientation of the insert helices. A membrane sensing-binding-bending mechanism is proposed to describe the process of an endophilin N-BAR interaction with a membrane.     

Structural basis of membrane bending by the N-BAR protein endophilin

Functioning as key players in cellular regulation of membrane curvature, BAR domain proteins bend bilayers and recruit interaction partners through poorly understood mechanisms. Using electron cryomicroscopy, we present reconstructions of full-length endophilin and its N-terminal N-BAR domain in their membrane-bound state. Endophilin lattices expose large areas of membrane surface and are held together by promiscuous interactions between endophilin's amphipathic N-terminal helices. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations reveal that endophilin lattices are highly dynamic and that the?N-terminal helices are required for formation of a stable and regular scaffold. Furthermore, endophilin accommodates different curvatures through?a quantized addition or removal of endophilin dimers, which in some cases causes dimerization of endophilin's SH3 domains, suggesting that the spatial presentation of SH3 domains, rather than affinity, governs the recruitment of downstream interaction partners.     

Membrane partitioning and lipid selectivity of the N-terminal amphipathic H0 helices of endophilin isoforms

Endophilin is an N-BAR protein, which is characterized by a crescent-shaped BAR domain and an amphipathic helix that contributes to the membrane binding of these proteins. The exact function of that H0 helix has been a topic of debate. In mammals, there are five different endophilin isoforms, grouped into A (three members) and B (two members) subclasses, which have been described to differ in their subcellular localization and function. We asked to what extent molecular properties of the H0 helices of these members affect their membrane targeting behavior.We found that all H0 helices of the endophilin isoforms display a two-state equilibrium between disordered and α-helical states in which the helical secondary structure can be stabilized through trifluoroethanol. The helicities in high TFE were strikingly different among the H0 peptides. We investigated H0-membrane partitioning by the monitoring of secondary structure changes via CD spectroscopy. We found that the presence of anionic phospholipids is critical for all H0 helices partitioning into membranes. Membrane partitioning is found to be sensitive to variations in membrane complexity. Overall, the H0 B subfamily displays stronger membrane partitioning than the H0 A subfamily. The H0 A peptide-membrane binding occurs predominantly through electrostatic interactions. Variation among the H0 A subfamily may be attributed to slight alterations in the amino acid sequence. Meanwhile, the H0 B subfamily displays greater specificity for certain membrane compositions, and this may link H0 B peptide binding to endophilin B's cellular function.     

The N-terminal helices of amphiphysin and endophilin have different capabilities of membrane remodeling

Amphiphysin and endophilin are two members of the N-BAR protein family. We have reported membrane interactions of the helix 0 of endophilin (H0-Endo). Here we investigate membrane modulations caused by the helix 0 of amphiphysin (H0-Amph). Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy was used to explore membrane properties. H0-Amph was found to reduce lipid mobility, make the membrane interior more polar, and decrease lipid chain orientational order. The EPR data also showed that for anionic membranes, H0-Endo acted as a more potent modulator. For instance, at peptide-to-lipid (P/L) ratio of 1/20, the peak-to-peak splitting was increased by 0.27 G and 1.89 G by H0-Amph and H0-Endo, respectively. Similarly, H0-Endo caused a larger change in the bilayer polarity than H0-Amph (30% versus 12% at P/L = 1/20). At P/L = 1/50, the chain orientational order was decreased by 26% and 66% by H0-Amph and H0-Endo, respectively. The different capabilities were explained by considering hydrophobicity score distributions. We employed atomic force microscopy to investigate membrane structural changes. Both peptides caused the formation of micron-sized holes. Interestingly, only H0-Amph induced membrane fusion as evidenced by the formation of high-rise regions. Lastly, experiments of giant unilamellar vesicles showed that H0-Amph and H0-Endo generated thin tubules and miniscule vesicles, respectively. Together, our studies showed that both helices are effective in altering membrane properties; the observed changes might be important for membrane curvature induction. Importantly, comparisons between the two peptides revealed that the degree of membrane remodeling is dependent on the sequence of the N-terminal helix of the N-BAR protein family.     

Membrane biology: fission behind BARs

Membrane bending is accomplished in part by amphipathic helix insertion into the bilayer and the assembly of BAR domain scaffolds preparing the membrane for fission. Two recent studies highlight the roles of amphipathic helices and BAR scaffolds in membrane fission and establish the structural basis of membrane bending by the N-BAR protein endophilin.     

Autoinhibition of Endophilin in Solution via Interdomain Interactions

Endophilin is a key protein involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Previous computational and experimental work suggested that the N-terminal helix is embedded into the membrane to induce curvature; however, the role of the SH3 domain remains controversial. To address this issue, we performed computer simulations of the endophilin dimer in solution to understand the interaction between the N-BAR and SH3 domains and its effect on biological function. We predict that the helix binds to the SH3 domain through hydrophobic and salt-bridge interactions. This protects the hydrophobic residues on both domains and keeps the SH3 domain near the end of the N-BAR domain, in agreement with previous experimental results. The complex has a binding strength similar to a few hydrogen bonds (13.0 ± 0.6 kcal/mol), and the SH3 domain stabilizes the structure of the N-terminal helix in solution. Electrostatic calculations show a large region of strongly positive electrostatic potential near the N-terminal that can orient the helix toward the membrane and likely embed the helix into the membrane surface. This predicted mechanism suggests that endophilin can select for both curvature and electrostatic potential when interacting with membranes, highlighting the importance of the SH3 domain in regulating the function of endophilin.     

Mechanism of endophilin N-BAR domain-mediated membrane curvature

Endophilin-A1 is a BAR domain-containing protein enriched at synapses and is implicated in synaptic vesicle endocytosis. It binds to dynamin and synaptojanin via a C-terminal SH3 domain. We examine the mechanism by which the BAR domain and an N-terminal amphipathic helix, which folds upon membrane binding, work as a functional unit (the N-BAR domain) to promote dimerisation and membrane curvature generation. By electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, we show that this amphipathic helix is peripherally bound in the plane of the membrane, with the midpoint of insertion aligned with the phosphate level of headgroups. This places the helix in an optimal position to effect membrane curvature generation. We solved the crystal structure of rat endophilin-A1 BAR domain and examined a distinctive insert protruding from the membrane interaction face. This insert is predicted to form an additional amphipathic helix and is important for curvature generation. Its presence defines an endophilin/nadrin subclass of BAR domains. We propose that N-BAR domains function as low-affinity dimers regulating binding partner recruitment to areas of high membrane curvature.     

Factors influencing local membrane curvature induction by N-BAR domains as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations

N-BAR domains are protein modules that bind to and induce curvature in membranes via a charged concave surface and N-terminal amphipathic helices. Recently, molecular dynamics simulations have demonstrated that the N-BAR domain can induce a strong local curvature that matches the curvature of the BAR domain surface facing the bilayer. Here we present further molecular dynamics simulations that examine in greater detail the roles of the concave surface and amphipathic helices in driving local membrane curvature. We find that the strong curvature induction observed in our previous simulations requires the stable presentation of the charged concave surface to the membrane and is not driven by the membrane-embedded amphipathic helices. Nevertheless, without these amphipathic helices embedded in the membrane, the N-BAR domain does not maintain a close association with the bilayer, and fails to drive membrane curvature. Increasing the membrane negative charge through the addition of PIP₂ facilitates closer association with the membrane in the absence of embedded helices. At sufficiently high concentrations, amphipathic helices embedded in the membrane drive membrane curvature independently of the BAR domain.     

Multiple Modes of Endophilin-mediated Conversion of Lipid Vesicles into Coated Tubes: IMPLICATIONS FOR SYNAPTIC ENDOCYTOSIS*

Endophilin A1 is a BAR (Bin/amphiphysin/Rvs) protein abundant in neural synapses that senses and induces membrane curvature, contributing to neck formation in presynaptic endocytic vesicles. To investigate its role in membrane remodeling, we used cryoelectron microscopy to characterize structural changes induced in lipid vesicles by exposure to endophilin. The vesicles convert rapidly to coated tubules whose morphology reflects the local concentration of endophilin. Their diameters and curvature resemble those of synaptic vesicles in situ. Three-dimensional reconstructions of quasicylindrical tubes revealed arrays of BAR dimers, flanked by densities that we equate with amphipathic helices whose folding and membrane insertion were attested by EPR. We also observed the compression of bulbous coated tubes into 70-Å-wide cylindrical micelles, which appear to mimic the penultimate (hemi-fission) stage of endocytosis. Our findings suggest that the adaptability of endophilin-lipid interactions underlies dynamic changes of endocytic membranes.     

Membrane-Bending Mechanism of Amphiphysin N-BAR Domains

BAR domains are highly conserved protein domains participating in a diversity of cellular processes that involve membrane remodeling. The mechanisms underlying such remodeling are debated. For the relatively well-studied case of amphiphysin N-BAR domain, one suggested mechanism involves scaffolding, i.e., binding of a negatively charged membrane to the protein's positively charged curved surface. An alternative mechanism suggests that insertion of the protein's N-terminal amphipathic segments (N-helices H0) into the membrane leads to bending. Here, we address the issue through all-atom and coarse-grained simulations of multiple amphiphysin N-BAR domains and their components interacting with a membrane. We observe that complete N-BAR domains and BAR domains without H0s bend the membrane, but H0s alone do not, which suggests that scaffolding, rather than helix insertion, plays a key role in membrane sculpting by amphiphysin N-BAR domains.     

Membrane fission is promoted by insertion of amphipathic helices and is restricted by crescent BAR domains

Shallow hydrophobic insertions and crescent-shaped BAR scaffolds promote membrane curvature. Here, we investigate membrane fission by shallow hydrophobic insertions quantitatively and mechanistically. We provide evidence that membrane insertion of the ENTH domain of epsin leads to liposome vesiculation, and that epsin is required for clathrin-coated vesicle budding in cells. We also show that BAR-domain scaffolds from endophilin, amphiphysin, GRAF, and β2-centaurin limit membrane fission driven by hydrophobic insertions. A quantitative assay for vesiculation reveals an antagonistic relationship between amphipathic helices and scaffolds of N-BAR domains in fission. The extent of vesiculation by these proteins and vesicle size depend on the number and length of amphipathic helices per BAR domain, in accord with theoretical considerations. This fission mechanism gives a new framework for understanding membrane scission in the absence of mechanoenzymes such as dynamin and suggests how Arf and Sar proteins work in vesicle scission.     

Regulation of Membrane-Shape Transitions Induced by I-BAR Domains

I-BAR proteins are well-known actin-cytoskeleton adaptors and have been observed to be involved in the formation of plasma membrane protrusions (filopodia). I-BAR proteins contain an all-helical, crescent-shaped IRSp53-MIM domain (IMD) dimer that is believed to be able to couple with a membrane shape. This coupling could involve the sensing and even the generation of negative plasma membrane curvature. Indeed, the in vitro studies have shown that IMDs can induce inward tubulation of liposomes. While N-BAR domains, which generate positive membrane curvature, have received a considerable amount of attention from both theory and experiments, the mechanisms of curvature coupling through IMDs are comparatively less studied and understood. Here we used a membrane-shape stability assay developed recently in our lab to quantitatively characterize IMD-induced membrane-shape transitions. We determined a membrane-shape stability diagram for IMDs that reveals how membrane tension and protein density can comodulate the generation of IMD-induced membrane protrusions. From comparison to analytical theory, we determine three key parameters that characterize the curvature coupling of IMD. We find that the curvature generation capacity of IMDs is significantly stronger compared to that of endophilin, an N-BAR protein known to be involved in plasma membrane shape transitions. Contrary to N-BAR domains, where amphipathic helix insertion is known to promote its membrane curvature generation, for IMDs we find that amphipathic helices inhibit membrane shape transitions, consistent with the inverse curvature that IMDs generate. Importantly, in both of these types of BAR domains, electrostatic interactions affect membrane-binding capacity, but do not appear to affect the curvature generation capacity of the protein. These two types of BAR domain proteins show qualitatively similar membrane shape stability diagrams, suggesting an underlying ubiquitous mechanism by which peripheral proteins regulate membrane curvature.     

Mechanism of membrane curvature sensing by amphipathic helix containing proteins

There are several examples of membrane-associated protein domains that target curved membranes. This behavior is believed to have functional significance in a number of essential pathways, such as clathrin-mediated endocytosis, which involve dramatic membrane remodeling and require the recruitment of various cofactors at different stages of the process. This work is motivated in part by recent experiments that demonstrated that the amphipathic N-terminal helix of endophilin (H0) targets curved membranes by binding to hydrophobic lipid bilayer packing defects which increase in number with increasing membrane curvature. Here we use state-of-the-art atomistic simulation to explore the packing defect structure of curved membranes, and the effect of this structure on the folding of H0. We find that not only are packing defects increased in number with increasing membrane curvature, but also that their size distribution depends nontrivially on the curvature, falling off exponentially with a decay constant that depends on the curvature, and crucially that even on highly curved membranes defects large enough to accommodate the hydrophobic face of H0 are never observed. We furthermore find that a percolation model for the defects explains the defect size distribution, which implies that larger defects are formed by coalescence of noninteracting smaller defects. We also use the recently developed metadynamics algorithm to study in detail the effect of such defects on H0 folding. It is found that the comparatively larger defects found on a convex membrane promote H0 folding by several kcal/mol, while the smaller defects found on flat and concave membrane surfaces inhibit folding by kinetically trapping the peptide. Together, these observations suggest H0 folding is a cooperative process in which the folding peptide changes the defect structure relative to an unperturbed membrane.     

The hydrophobic insertion mechanism of membrane curvature generation by proteins

A wide spectrum of intracellular processes is dependent on the ability of cells to dynamically regulate membrane shape. Membrane bending by proteins is necessary for the generation of intracellular transport carriers and for the maintenance of otherwise intrinsically unstable regions of high membrane curvature in cell organelles. Understanding the mechanisms by which proteins curve membranes is therefore of primary importance. Here we suggest, for the first time to our knowledge, a quantitative mechanism of lipid membrane bending by hydrophobic or amphipathic rodlike inclusions which simulate amphipathic α-helices—structures shown to sculpt membranes. Considering the lipid monolayer matrix as an anisotropic elastic material, we compute the intramembrane stresses and strains generated by the embedded inclusions, determine the resulting membrane shapes, and the accumulated elastic energy. We characterize the ability of an inclusion to bend membranes by an effective spontaneous curvature, and show that shallow rodlike inclusions are more effective in membrane shaping than are lipids having a high propensity for curvature. Our computations provide experimentally testable predictions on the protein amounts needed to generate intracellular membrane shapes for various insertion depths and membrane thicknesses. We also predict that the ability of N-BAR domains to produce membrane tubules in vivo can be ascribed solely to insertion of their amphipathic helices.     

Membrane fission: curvature-sensitive proteins cut it both ways

Boucrot et al. (2012) demonstrate a membrane fission mechanism independent of nucleotide hydrolysis that is based on membrane insertion of amphipathic helices. They show that, for N-BAR domain proteins, which promote membrane curvature but also contain amphipathic helices, fission is opposed by the BAR domain that stabilizes tubular membrane structures.     

Structure and dynamics of helix-0 of the N-BAR domain in lipid micelles and bilayers

Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs-homology (BAR) domains generate and sense membrane curvature by binding the negatively charged membrane to their positively charged concave surfaces. N-BAR domains contain an N-terminal extension (helix-0) predicted to form an amphipathic helix upon membrane binding. We determined the NMR structure and nano-to-picosecond dynamics of helix-0 of the human Bin1/Amphiphysin II BAR domain in sodium dodecyl sulfate and dodecylphosphocholine micelles. Molecular dynamics simulations of this 34-amino acid peptide revealed electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions with the detergent molecules that induce helical structure formation from residues 8-10 toward the C-terminus. The orientation in the micelles was experimentally confirmed by backbone amide proton exchange. The simulation and the experiment indicated that the N-terminal region is disordered, and the peptide curves to adopted the micelle shape. Deletion of helix-0 reduced tubulation of liposomes by the BAR domain, whereas the helix-0 peptide itself was fusogenic. These findings support models for membrane curving by BAR domains in which helix-0 increases the binding affinity to the membrane and enhances curvature generation.     

The amphipathic helices of Arfrp1 and Arl14 are sufficient to determine subcellular localizations

The subcellular localization of Arf family proteins is generally thought to be determined by their corresponding guanine nucleotide exchange factors. By promoting GTP binding, guanine nucleotide exchange factors induce conformational changes of Arf proteins exposing their N-terminal amphipathic helices, which then insert into the membranes to stabilize the membrane association process. Here, we found that the N-terminal amphipathic motifs of the Golgi-localized Arf family protein, Arfrp1, and the endosome- and plasma membrane–localized Arf family protein, Arl14, play critical roles in spatial determination. Exchanging the amphipathic helix motifs between these two Arf proteins causes the switch of their localizations. Moreover, the amphipathic helices of Arfrp1 and Arl14 are sufficient for cytosolic proteins to be localized into a specific cellular compartment. The spatial determination mediated by the Arfrp1 helix requires its binding partner Sys1. In addition, the residues that are required for the acetylation of the Arfrp1 helix and the myristoylation of the Arl14 helix are important for the specific subcellular localization. Interestingly, Arfrp1 and Arl14 are recruited to their specific cellular compartments independent of GTP binding. Our results demonstrate that the amphipathic motifs of Arfrp1 and Arl14 are sufficient for determining specific subcellular localizations in a GTP-independent manner, suggesting that the membrane association and activation of some Arf proteins are uncoupled.     

GTP-stimulated membrane fission by the N-BAR protein AMPH-1

Membrane-enclosed transport carriers sort biological molecules between stations in the cell in a dynamic process that is fundamental to the physiology of eukaryotic organisms. While much is known about the formation and release of carriers from specific intracellular membranes, the mechanism of carrier formation from the recycling endosome, a compartment central to cellular signaling, remains to be resolved. In Caenorhabditis elegans, formation of transport carriers from the recycling endosome requires the dynamin-like, Eps15-homology domain (EHD) protein, RME-1, functioning with the Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (N-BAR) domain protein, AMPH-1. Here we show, using a free-solution single-particle technique known as burst analysis spectroscopy (BAS), that AMPH-1 alone creates small, tubular-vesicular products from large, unilamellar vesicles by membrane fission. Membrane fission requires the amphipathic H0 helix of AMPH-1 and is slowed in the presence of RME-1. Unexpectedly, AMPH-1-induced membrane fission is stimulated in the presence of GTP. Furthermore, the GTP-stimulated membrane fission activity seen for AMPH-1 is recapitulated by the heterodimeric N-BAR amphiphysin protein from yeast, Rvs161/167p, strongly suggesting that GTP-stimulated membrane fission is a general property of this important class of N-BAR proteins.     

Mechanisms for the modulation of membrane bilayer properties by amphipathic helical peptides

The amphipathic helix, in which hydrophobia and hydrophilic residues are grouped on opposing faces, is a structural mot if found in many peptides and proteins that bind to membranes. One of the physical properties of membranes that can be altered by the binding of amphipathic helices is membrane monolayer curvature strain. Class A amphipathic helices, which are present in exchangeable plasma lipoproteins, can stabilize membranes by reducing negative monolayer curvature strain; proline-punctuated class A amphipathic helical segments are particularly effective in this regard. This property is suggested to be associated with some of the beneficial biological effects of this protein. On the other hand, lytic amphipathic helical peptides can act by increasing negative curvature strain or by forming pores composed of helical clusters. Thus, different amphipathic helical peptides can be membrane stabilizing or be lytic to membranes, depending on the structural motif of the helix, which in turn determines the nature of its association with membranes. Features of these peptides that are responsible for their specific properties are discussed. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.