Conformational change of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) induced by antibiotic binding. Crystal structure of the complex between EF-Tu.GDP and aurodox

Aurodox is a member of the family of kirromycin antibiotics, which inhibit protein biosynthesis by binding to elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu). We have determined the crystal structure of the 1:1:1 complex of Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu with GDP and aurodox to 2.0-A resolution. During its catalytic cycle, EF-Tu adopts two strikingly different conformations depending on the nucleotide bound: the GDP form and the GTP form. In the present structure, a GTP complex-like conformation of EF-Tu is observed, although GDP is bound to the nucleotide-binding site. This is consistent with previous proposals that aurodox fixes EF-Tu on the ribosome by locking it in its GTP form. Binding of EF-Tu.GDP to aminoacyl-tRNA and mutually exclusive binding of kirromycin and elongation factor Ts to EF-Tu can be explained on the basis of the structure. For many previously observed mutations that provide resistance to kirromycin, it can now be understood how they prevent interaction with the antibiotic. An unexpected feature of the structure is the reorientation of the His-85 side chain toward the nucleotide-binding site. We propose that this residue stabilizes the transition state of GTP hydrolysis, explaining the acceleration of the reaction by kirromycin-type antibiotics.     

GTPases mechanisms and functions of translation factors on the ribosome

The elongation factors (EF) Tu and G and initiation factor 2 (IF2) from bacteria are multidomain GTPases with essential functions in the elongation and initiation phases of translation. They bind to the same site on the ribosome where their low intrinsic GTPase activities are strongly stimulated. The factors differ fundamentally from each other, and from the majority of GTPases, in the mechanisms of GTPase control, the timing of Pi release, and the functional role of GTP hydrolysis. EF-Tu x GTP forms a ternary complex with aminoacyl-tRNA, which binds to the ribosome. Only when a matching codon is recognized, the GTPase of EF-Tu is stimulated, rapid GTP hydrolysis and Pi release take place, EF-Tu rearranges to the GDP form, and aminoacyl-tRNA is released into the peptidyltransferase center. In contrast, EF-G hydrolyzes GTP immediately upon binding to the ribosome, stimulated by ribosomal protein L7/12. Subsequent translocation is driven by the slow dissociation of Pi, suggesting a mechano-chemical function of EF-G. Accordingly, different conformations of EF-G on the ribosome are revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is triggered upon formation of the 70S initiation complex, and the dissociation of Pi and/or IF2 follows a rearrangement of the ribosome into the elongation-competent state.     

Visualization of the eEF2-80S ribosome transition-state complex by cryo-electron microscopy

In an attempt to understand ribosome-induced GTP hydrolysis on eEF2, we determined a 12.6-Å cryo-electron microscopy reconstruction of the eEF2-bound 80S ribosome in the presence of aluminum tetrafluoride and GDP, with aluminum tetrafluoride mimicking the γ-phosphate during hydrolysis. This is the first visualization of a structure representing a transition-state complex on the ribosome. Tight interactions are observed between the factor's G domain and the large ribosomal subunit, as well as between domain IV and an intersubunit bridge. In contrast, some of the domains of eEF2 implicated in small subunit binding display a large degree of flexibility. Furthermore, we find support for a transition-state model conformation of the switch I region in this complex where the reoriented switch I region interacts with a conserved rRNA region of the 40S subunit formed by loops of the 18S RNA helices 8 and 14. This complex is structurally distinct from the eEF2-bound 80S ribosome complexes previously reported, and analysis of this map sheds light on the GTPase-coupled translocation mechanism.     

Molecular dynamics of ribosomal elongation factors G and Tu

Translation on the ribosome is controlled by external factors. During polypeptide lengthening, elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G consecutively interact with the bacterial ribosome. EF-Tu binds and delivers an aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A site and EF-G helps translocate the tRNAs between their binding sites after the peptide bond is formed. These processes occur at the expense of GTP. EF-Tu:tRNA and EF-G are of similar shape, share a common binding site, and undergo large conformational changes on interaction with the ribosome. To characterize the internal motion of these two elongation factors, we used 25 ns long all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. We observed enhanced mobility of EF-G domains III, IV, and V and of tRNA in the EF-Tu:tRNA complex. EF-Tu:GDP complex acquired a configuration different from that found in the crystal structure of EF-Tu with a GTP analogue, showing conformational changes in the switch I and II regions. The calculated electrostatic properties of elongation factors showed no global similarity even though matching electrostatic surface patches were found around the domain I that contacts the ribosome, and in the GDP/GTP binding region.     

EF-Tu dynamics during pre-translocation complex formation: EF-Tu·GDP exits the ribosome via two different pathways

The G-protein EF-Tu, which undergoes a major conformational change when EF-Tu·GTP is converted to EF-Tu·GDP, forms part of an aminoacyl(aa)-tRNA·EF-Tu·GTP ternary complex (TC) that accelerates the binding of aa-tRNA to the ribosome during peptide elongation. Such binding, placing a portion of EF-Tu in contact with the GTPase Associated Center (GAC), is followed by GTP hydrolysis and P_i release, and results in formation of a pretranslocation (PRE) complex. Although tRNA movement through the ribosome during PRE complex formation has been extensively studied, comparatively little is known about the dynamics of EF-Tu interaction with either the ribosome or aa-tRNA. Here we examine these dynamics, utilizing ensemble and single molecule assays employing fluorescent labeled derivatives of EF-Tu, tRNA, and the ribosome to measure changes in either FRET efficiency or fluorescence intensity during PRE complex formation. Our results indicate that ribosome-bound EF-Tu separates from the GAC prior to its full separation from aa-tRNA, and suggest that EF-Tu·GDP dissociates from the ribosome by two different pathways. These pathways correspond to either reversible EF-Tu·GDP dissociation from the ribosome prior to the major conformational change in EF-Tu that follows GTP hydrolysis, or irreversible dissociation after or concomitant with this conformational change.     

Ribosome interactions of aminoacyl-tRNA and elongation factor Tu in the codon-recognition complex

The mRNA codon in the ribosomal A-site is recognized by aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) in a ternary complex with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. Here we report the 13 A resolution three-dimensional reconstruction determined by cryo-electron microscopy of the kirromycin-stalled codon-recognition complex. The structure of the ternary complex is distorted by binding of the tRNA anticodon arm in the decoding center. The aa-tRNA interacts with 16S rRNA, helix 69 of 23S rRNA and proteins S12 and L11, while the sarcin-ricin loop of 23S rRNA contacts domain 1 of EF-Tu near the nucleotide-binding pocket. These results provide a detailed snapshot view of an important functional state of the ribosome and suggest mechanisms of decoding and GTPase activation.     

Domain III of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus is essential for induction of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Two elongation factors (EF) EF-Tu and EF-G participate in the elongation phase during protein biosynthesis on the ribosome. Their functional cycles depend on GTP binding and its hydrolysis. The EF-Tu complexed with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA delivers tRNA to the ribosome, whereas EF-G stimulates translocation, a process in which tRNA and mRNA movements occur in the ribosome. In the present paper we report that: (a) intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is influenced by excision of its domain III; (b) the EF-G lacking domain III has a 10(3)-fold decreased GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas its affinity for GTP is slightly decreased; and (c) the truncated EF-G does not stimulate translocation despite the physical presence of domain IV, which is also very important for translocation. By contrast, the interactions of the truncated factor with GDP and fusidic acid-dependent binding of EF-G.GDP complex to the ribosome are not influenced. These findings indicate an essential contribution of domain III to activation of GTP hydrolysis. These results also suggest conformational changes of the EF-G molecule in the course of its interaction with the ribosome that might be induced by GTP binding and hydrolysis.     

A signal relay between ribosomal protein S12 and elongation factor EF-Tu during decoding of mRNA

Codon recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA on the ribosome triggers a process leading to GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and release of aminoacyl-tRNA into the A site of the ribosome. The nature of this signal is largely unknown. Here, we present genetic evidence that a specific set of direct interactions between ribosomal protein S12 and aminoacyl-tRNA, together with contacts between S12 and 16S rRNA, provide a pathway for the signaling of codon recognition to EF-Tu. Three novel amino acid substitutions, H76R, R37C, and K53E in Thermus thermophilus ribosomal protein S12, confer resistance to streptomycin. The streptomycin-resistance phenotypes of H76R, R37C, and K53E are all abolished by the mutation A375T in EF-Tu. A375T confers resistance to kirromycin, an antibiotic freezing EF-Tu in a GTPase activated state. H76 contacts aminoacyl-tRNA in ternary complex with EF-Tu and GTP, while R37 and K53 are involved in the conformational transition of the 30S subunit occurring upon codon recognition. We propose that codon recognition and domain closure of the 30S subunit are signaled through aminoacyl-tRNA to EF-Tu via these S12 residues.     

Possible evolution of factors involved in protein biosynthesis.

The elongation factors of protein biosynthesis are well preserved through out evolution. They catalyze the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis, where on the ribosome amino acids are added one at a time to a growing peptide according to the genetic information transcribed into mRNA. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) provides the binding of aminoacylated tRNA to the ribosome and protects the aminoester bond against hydrolysis until a correct match between the codon on mRNA and the anticodon on tRNA can be achieved. Elongation factor G (EF-G) supports the translocation of tRNAs and of mRNA on the ribosome so that a new codon can be exposed for decoding. Both these factors are GTP binding proteins, and as such exist in an active form with GTP and an inactive form with GDP bound to the nucleotide binding domain. Elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) will catalyze the exchange of nucleotide on EF-Tu. This review describes structural work on EF-Tu performed in our laboratory over the last eight years. The structural results provide a rather complete picture of the major structural forms of EF-Tu, including the so called ternary complex of aa-tRNA:EF-Tu:GTP. The structural comparison of this ternary complex with the structure of EF-G:GDP displays an unexpected macromolecular mimicry, where three domains of EF-G mimick the shape of the tRNA in the ternary complex. This observation has initiated much speculation on the evolution of all factors involved in protein synthesis, as well as on the details of the ribosomal function in one part of elongation.     

Elongation factor Tu ternary complex binds to small ribosomal subunits in a functionally active state

A complex between elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), GTP, phenylalanyl-tRNA (Phe-tRNA), oligo(uridylic acid) [oligo(U)], and the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli has been formed and isolated. Binding of the EF-Tu complex appears to be at the functionally active 30S site, by all biochemical criteria that were examined. The complex can be isolated with 0.25-0.5 copy of EF-Tu bound per ribosome. The binding is dependent upon the presence of both the aminoacyl-tRNA and the cognate messenger RNA. Addition of 50S subunits to the preformed 30S-EF-Tu-GTP-Phe-tRNA-oligo(U) complex ("30S-EF-Tu complex") causes a rapid hydrolysis of GTP. This hydrolysis is coordinated with the formation of 70S ribosomes and the release of EF-Tu. Both the release of EF-Tu and the hydrolysis of GTP are stoichiometric with the amount of added 50S subunits. 70S ribosomes, in contrast to 50S subunits, neither release EF-Tu nor rapidly hydrolyze GTP when added to the 30S-EF-Tu complexes. The inability of 70S ribosomes to react with the 30S-EF-Tu complex argues that the 30S-EF-Tu complex does not dissociate prior to reaction with the 50S subunit. The requirements of the 30S reaction for Phe-tRNA and oligo(U) and the consequences of the addition of 50S subunits resemble the reaction of EF-Tu with 70S ribosomes, although EF-Tu binding to isolated 30S subunits does not occur during the elongation microcycle. This suggests that the EF-Tu ternary complex binds to isolated 30S subunits at the same 30S site that is occupied during ternary complex interaction with the 70S ribosome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Structure-function relationships of elongation factor Tu as studied by mutagenesis.

We have modified elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) from Escherichia coli via mutagenesis of its encoding tufA gene to study its function-structure relationships. The isolation of the N-terminal half molecule of EF-Tu (G domain) has facilitated the analysis of the basic EF-Tu activities, since the G domain binds the substrate GTP/GDP, catalyzes the GTP hydrolysis and is not exposed to the allosteric constraints of the intact molecule. So far, the best studied region has been the guanine nucleotide-binding pocket defined by the consensus elements typical for the GTP-binding proteins. In this area most substitutions were carried out in the G domain and were found to influence GTP hydrolysis. In particular, the mutation VG20 (in both G domain and EF-Tu) decreases this activity and enhances the GDP to GTP exchange; PT82 induces autophosphorylation of Thr82 and HG84 strongly affects the GTPase without altering the interaction with the substrate. SD173, a residue interacting with (O)6 of the guanine, abolishes the GTP and GDP binding activity. Substitution of residues Gln114 and Glu117, located in the proximity of the GTP binding pocket, influences respectively the GTPase and the stability of the G domain, whereas the double replacement VD88/LK121, located on alpha-helices bordering the GTP-binding pocket, moderately reduces the stability of the G domain without greatly affecting GTPase and interaction with GTP(GDP). Concerning the effect of ligands, EF-TuVG20 supports a lower poly(Phe) synthesis but is more accurate than wild-type EF-Tu, probably due to a longer pausing on the ribosome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Codon-dependent conformational change of elongation factor Tu preceding GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome.

The mechanisms by which elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) promotes the binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the ribosome and, in particular, how GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu is triggered on the ribosome, are not understood. We report steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements, performed in the Escherichia coli system, in which the interaction of the complex EF-Tu.GTP.Phe-tRNAPhe with the ribosomal A site is monitored by the fluorescence changes of either mant-dGTP [3'-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)-2-deoxyguanosine triphosphate], replacing GTP in the complex, or of wybutine in the anticodon loop of the tRNA. Additionally, GTP hydrolysis is measured by the quench-flow technique. We find that codon-anticodon interaction induces a rapid rearrangement within the G domain of EF-Tu around the bound nucleotide, which is followed by GTP hydrolysis at an approximately 1.5-fold lower rate. In the presence of kirromycin, the activated conformation of EF-Tu appears to be frozen. The steps following GTP hydrolysis--the switch of EF-Tu to the GDP-bound conformation, the release of aminoacyl-tRNA from EF-Tu to the A site, and the dissociation of EF-Tu-GDP from the ribosome--which are altogether suppressed by kirromycin, are not distinguished kinetically. The results suggest that codon recognition by the ternary complex on the ribosome initiates a series of structural rearrangements resulting in a conformational change of EF-Tu, possibly involving the effector region, which, in turn, triggers GTP hydrolysis.     

Interaction of animal mitochondrial EF-Tu.EF-Ts with aminoacyl-tRNA, guanine nucleotides, and ribosomes

The mammalian mitochondrial complex consisting of elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-Ts (EF-Tu.Tsmt) is capable of efficiently binding aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosome in the presence and absence of guanine nucleotides. In the presence of GTP the binding reaction is catalytic. In the absence of guanine nucleotides, or in the presence of a non-hydrolyzable GTP analog, only one round of ribosome binding occurs. EF-Tu.Tsmt is capable of forming a ternary complex with GTP and Escherichia coli Phe-tRNA as demonstrated by gel filtration chromatography, nitrocellulose filter binding, and by protection of the aminoacyl-tRNA bond from hydrolysis. GDP and the non-hydrolyzable GTP analog guanyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate are also capable of facilitating ternary complex formation with EF-Tu.Tsmt, but are less effective. No kinetic advantage results from the formation of this ternary complex prior to ribosome binding, and EF-Tu.Tsmt may actually bind aminoacyl-tRNA directly to the ribosome prior to binding GTP. These results suggest that a variation of the prokaryotic elongation cycle is occurring in animal mitochondria. N-Ethylmaleimide inhibits the activity of EF-Tu.Tsmt in polymerization and in ribosome binding. However, the activity of the EF-Tsmt which can be measured independently, is not altered.     

Substitution of Val20 by Gly in elongation factor Tu. Effects on the interaction with elongation factors Ts, aminoacyl-tRNA and ribosomes

Substitution of V20 by G in the consensus element G18HVDHGK24 of EF-Tu (referred to as EF-TuG20) strongly influences the interaction with GDP as well as the GTPase activity [Jacquet, E. & Parmeggiani, A. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 2861-2867]. In an extension of this work we describe additional properties of the mutated factor, paying particular attention to the interaction with the macromolecular ligands. Our results show that the conformational transitions induced by the mutation strongly favor the regeneration of the active complex EF-TuG20.GTP, almost as effectively as with wild-type EF-Tu in the presence of elongation factor Ts. Addition of elongation factor Ts further enhances the rate of the GDP to GTP exchange of the mutated factor. Remarkably, EF-TuG20.GDP can support the enzymatic binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to ribosome.mRNA at low MgCl2 concentration, an effect that with wild-type EF-Tu can only occur in the presence of kirromycin. Our results show that EF-TuG20.GDP shares common features with the GTP-like conformation induced by kirromycin on wild-type EF-Tu. The ability of the ribosome to activate the EF-TuG20 center for GTP hydrolysis is strongly decreased, while the stimulation by aminoacyl-tRNA is conserved. The ribosomal activity is partially restored by addition of aminoacyl-tRNA plus poly(U), showing that codon/anticodon interaction contribute to correct the anomalous interaction between ternary complex and ribosomes. The impaired activity of EF-TuG20 in poly(Phe) synthesis is related to the degree of defective GTP hydrolysis and, most interestingly, it is characterized by a striking increase of the fidelity of translation at high MgCl2 concentration. This effect probably depends on a more selective recognition of the ternary complex by ribosome.mRNA, as a consequence of a longer pausing of EF-TuG20 on the ribosome. In conclusion, position 20 in EF-Tu is important for coordinating the allosteric mechanisms controlling the action of EF-Tu and its ligands.     

Eukaryotic elongation factor 2 can bind to the synthetic oligoribonucleotide that mimics sarcin/ricin domain of rat 28S ribosomal RNA

Eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) catalyzes the translocation of peptidyl-tRNA from the A site to P site by binding to the ribosome. In this work, the complex formation of rat liver eEF2 with a synthetic oligoribonucleotide (SRD RNA) that mimics sarcin/ricin domain of rat 28S ribosomal RNA is invested in vitro. Purified eEF2 can specifically bind SRD RNA to form a stable complex. tRNA competes with SRD RNA in binding to eEF2 in a less extent. Pretreatment of eEF2 with GDP or ADP-ribosylation of eEF2 by diphtheria toxin can obviously reduce the ability of eEF2 to form the complex with the synthetic oligoribonucleotide. These results indicate that eEF2 is likely to bind directly to the sarcin/ricin domain of 28S ribosomal RNA in the process of protein synthesis.     

Initiation factor IF2, thiostrepton and micrococcin prevent the binding of elongation factor G to the Escherichia coli ribosome

The bacterial translational GTPases (initiation factor IF2, elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu and release factor RF3) are involved in all stages of translation, and evidence indicates that they bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome, whereupon GTP hydrolysis is triggered. We provide evidence for a common ribosomal binding site for EF-G and IF2. IF2 prevents the binding of EF-G to the ribosome, as shown by Western blot analysis and fusidic acid-stabilized EF-G.GDP.ribosome complex formation. Additionally, IF2 inhibits EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis on 70 S ribosomes. The antibiotics thiostrepton and micrococcin, which bind to part of the EF-G binding site and interfere with the function of the factor, also affect the function of IF2. While thiostrepton is a strong inhibitor of EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis, GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is stimulated by the drug. Micrococcin stimulates GTP hydrolysis by both factors. We show directly that these drugs act by destabilizing the interaction of EF-G with the ribosome, and provide evidence that they have similar effects on IF2.     

GTPases of the Translation Apparatus

Protein biosynthesis is a complex biochemical process involving a number of stages at which different translation factors specifically interact with ribosome. Some of these factors belong to GTP-binding proteins, or G-proteins. Due to their functioning, GTP is hydrolyzed to yield GDP and the inorganic phosphate ion P_i. Interaction with ribosome enhances GTPase activity of translation factors; i.e., ribosome plays a role of GTPase-activating protein (GAP). GTPases involved in translation interact with ribosome at every stage of protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 (IF2) catalyzes initiator tRNA binding to the ribosome P site and subsequent binding of the 50S subunit to the initiation complex of the 30S subunit. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) controls aminoacyl-tRNA delivery to the ribosome A site, while elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex by one codon on the ribosome. Release factor 3 (RF3) catalyzes the release of termination factors 1 or 2 (RF1 or RF2) from the ribosomal complex after completion of protein synthesis and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. The functional properties of translational GTPases as related to other G-proteins, the putative mechanism of GTP hydrolysis, structural features, and the functional cycles of translational GTPases are considered.     

Recognition and selection of tRNA in translation

Aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) is delivered to the ribosome in a ternary complex with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. The stepwise movement of aa-tRNA from EF-Tu into the ribosomal A site entails a number of intermediates. The ribosome recognizes aa-tRNA through shape discrimination of the codon-anticodon duplex and regulates the rates of GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu and aa-tRNA accommodation in the A site by an induced fit mechanism. Recent results of kinetic measurements, ribosome crystallography, single molecule FRET measurements, and cryo-electron microscopy suggest the mechanism of tRNA recognition and selection.     

Mitotic modulation of translation elongation factor 1 leads to hindered tRNA delivery to ribosomes

Translation elongation in eukaryotes is mediated by the concerted actions of elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), which delivers aminoacylated tRNA to the ribosome; elongation factor 1B (eEF1B) complex, which catalyzes the exchange of GDP to GTP on eEF1A; and eEF2, which facilitates ribosomal translocation. Here we present evidence in support of a novel mode of translation regulation by hindered tRNA delivery during mitosis. A conserved consensus phosphorylation site for the mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase 1 on the catalytic delta subunit of eEF1B (termed eEF1D) is required for its posttranslational modification during mitosis, resulting in lower affinity to its substrate eEF1A. This modification is correlated with reduced availability of eEF1A·tRNA complexes, as well as reduced delivery of tRNA to and association of eEF1A with elongating ribosomes. This mode of regulation by hindered tRNA delivery, although first discovered in mitosis, may represent a more globally applicable mechanism employed under other physiological conditions that involve down-regulation of protein synthesis at the elongation level.     

Mechanism of the chemical step for the guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis catalyzed by elongation factor Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), the protein responsible for delivering aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) to ribosomal A site during translation, belongs to the group of guanosine-nucleotide (GTP/GDP) binding proteins. Its active 'on'-state corresponds to the GTP-bound form, while the inactive 'off'-state corresponds to the GDP-bound form. In this work we focus on the chemical step, GTP+H(2)O-->GDP+Pi, of the hydrolysis mechanism. We apply molecular modeling tools including molecular dynamics simulations and the combined quantum mechanical-molecular mechanical calculations for estimates of reaction energy profiles for two possible arrangements of switch II regions of EF-Tu. In the first case we presumably mimic binding of the ternary complex EF-Tu.GTP.aa-tRNA to the ribosome and allow the histidine (His85) side chain of the protein to approach the reaction active site. In the second case, corresponding to the GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu alone, the side chain of His85 stays away from the active site, and the chemical reaction GTP+H(2)O-->GDP+Pi proceeds without participation of the histidine but through water molecules. In agreement with the experimental observations which distinguish rate constants for the fast chemical reaction in EF-Tu.GTP.aa-tRNA.ribosome and the slow spontaneous GTP hydrolysis in EF-Tu, we show that the activation energy barrier for the first scenario is considerably lower compared to that of the second case.