Complementation of a Herpes Simplex Virus ICP0 Null Mutant by Varicella-Zoster Virus ORF61p

The herpes simplex virus (HSV) ICP0 protein acts to overcome intrinsic cellular defenses that repress viral α gene expression. In that vein, viruses that have mutations in ICP0''s RING finger or are deleted for the gene are sensitive to interferon, as they fail to direct degradation of promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML), a component of host nuclear domain 10s. While varicella-zoster virus is also insensitive to interferon, ORF61p, its ICP0 ortholog, failed to degrade PML. A recombinant virus with each coding region of the gene for ICP0 replaced with sequences encoding ORF61p was constructed. This virus was compared to an ICP0 deletion mutant and wild-type HSV. The recombinant degraded only Sp100 and not PML and grew to higher titers than its ICP0 null parental virus, but it was sensitive to interferon, like the virus from which it was derived. This analysis permitted us to compare the activities of ICP0 and ORF61p in identical backgrounds and revealed distinct biologic roles for these proteins.Alphaherpesviruses encode orthologs of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) α gene product ICP0. ICP0 is a nuclear phosphoprotein that behaves as a promiscuous activator of viral and cellular genes (7, 11, 28, 29). ICP0 also functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to target several host proteins for proteasomal degradation (4, 10, 11, 16, 26). Through this activity, ICP0 promotes degradation of components of nuclear domain 10 (ND10) bodies, including the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) and Sp100. These proteins are implicated in silencing of herpesvirus genomes (9, 10, 22, 34). Therefore, ICP0-mediated degradation of ND10 components may disrupt silencing of HSV genes to enable efficient gene expression. This hypothesis provides a plausible mechanistic explanation of how ICP0 induces gene activation.Introduction of DNA encoding the ICP0 orthologs from HSV, bovine herpesvirus, equine herpesvirus, and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) can also affect nuclear structures and proteins (27). In addition, and more specific to this report, ORF61p, the VZV ortholog, activates viral promoters and enhances infectivity of viral DNA like ICP0, the prototype for this gene family (24, 25). However, we have previously demonstrated two key biological differences between the HSV and VZV orthologs. We first showed that unlike ICP0, ORF61p is unable to complement depletion of BAG3, a host cochaperone protein. As a result, VZV is affected by silencing of BAG3 (15), whereas growth of HSV is altered only when ICP0 is not expressed (17). Furthermore, we have shown that while both proteins target components of ND10s, expression of ICP0 results in degradation of both PML and Sp100, whereas ORF61p specifically reduces Sp100 levels (16). These findings suggest that these proteins have evolved separately to provide different functions for virus replication.Virus mutants lacking the ICP0 gene have an increased particle-to-PFU ratio, a substantially lower yield, and decreased levels of α gene expression, in a multiplicity-of-infection (MOI)- and cell-type-dependent manner (2, 4, 8, 33). These mutants are also defective at degrading ND10 components (23). Depletion of PML and Sp100 accelerates virus gene expression and increases plaquing efficiency of HSV ICP0-defective viruses but has no effect on wild-type virus, suggesting that PML and Sp100 are components of an intrinsic anti-HSV defense mechanism that is counteracted by ICP0''s E3 ligase activity (9, 10). Interestingly, ICP0 null viruses are also hypersensitive to interferon (IFN) (26), a property that was suggested to be mediated via PML (3).To directly compare the activities of the two orthologs, we constructed an HSV mutant virus that expresses ORF61p in place of ICP0. The resulting chimeric virus only partially rescues the ICP0 null phenotype. Our studies emphasize the biological differences between ICP0 and ORF61p and shed light on the requirements for PML and Sp100 during infection.     

Conserved Motifs within Ebola and Marburg Virus VP40 Proteins Are Important for Stability,Localization, and Subsequent Budding of Virus-Like Particles

The filovirus VP40 protein is capable of budding from mammalian cells in the form of virus-like particles (VLPs) that are morphologically indistinguishable from infectious virions. Ebola virus VP40 (eVP40) contains well-characterized overlapping L domains, which play a key role in mediating efficient virus egress. L domains represent only one component required for efficient budding and, therefore, there is a need to identify and characterize additional domains important for VP40 function. We demonstrate here that the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ sequence of eVP40 and the corresponding ₈₄LPLGIM₈₉ sequence of Marburg virus VP40 (mVP40) are critical for efficient release of VP40 VLPs. Indeed, deletion of these motifs essentially abolished the ability of eVP40 and mVP40 to bud as VLPs. To address the mechanism by which the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif of eVP40 contributes to egress, a series of point mutations were introduced into this motif. These mutants were then compared to the eVP40 wild type in a VLP budding assay to assess budding competency. Confocal microscopy and gel filtration analyses were performed to assess their pattern of intracellular localization and ability to oligomerize, respectively. Our results show that mutations disrupting the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif resulted in both altered patterns of intracellular localization and self-assembly compared to wild-type controls. Interestingly, coexpression of either Ebola virus GP-WT or mVP40-WT with eVP40-ΔLPLGVA failed to rescue the budding defective eVP40-ΔLPLGVA mutant into VLPs; however, coexpression of eVP40-WT with mVP40-ΔLPLGIM successfully rescued budding of mVP40-ΔLPLGIM into VLPs at mVP40-WT levels. In sum, our findings implicate the LPLGVA and LPLGIM motifs of eVP40 and mVP40, respectively, as being important for VP40 structure/stability and budding.Ebola and Marburg viruses are members of the family Filoviridae. Filoviruses are filamentous, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that cause lethal hemorrhagic fevers in both humans and nonhuman primates (5). Filoviruses encode seven viral proteins including: NP (major nucleoprotein), VP35 (phosphoprotein), VP40 (matrix protein), GP (glycoprotein), VP30 (minor nucleoprotein), VP24 (secondary matrix protein), and L (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) (2, 5, 10, 12, 45). Numerous studies have shown that expression of Ebola virus VP40 (eVP40) alone in mammalian cells leads to the production of virus-like particles (VLPs) with filamentous morphology which is indistinguishable from infectious Ebola virus particles (12, 17, 18, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 49). Like many enveloped viruses such as rhabdovirus (11) and arenaviruses (44), Ebola virus encodes late-assembly or L domains, which are sequences required for the membrane fission event that separates viral and cellular membranes to release nascent virion particles (1, 5, 7, 10, 12, 18, 25, 27, 34). Thus far, four classes of L domains have been identified which were defined by their conserved amino acid core sequences: the Pro-Thr/Ser-Ala-Pro (PT/SAP) motif (25, 27), the Pro-Pro-x-Tyr (PPxY) motif (11, 12, 18, 19, 41, 53), the Tyr-x-x-Leu (YxxL) motif (3, 15, 27, 37), and the Phe-Pro-Ile-Val (FPIV) motif (39). Both PTAP and the PPxY motifs are essential for efficient particle release for eVP40 (25, 27, 48, 49), whereas mVP40 contains only a PPxY motif. L domains are believed to act as docking sites for the recruitment of cellular proteins involved in endocytic trafficking and multivesicular body biogenesis to facilitate virus-cell separation (8, 13, 14, 16, 28, 29, 33, 36, 43, 50, 51).In addition to L domains, oligomerization, and plasma-membrane localization of VP40 are two functions of the protein that are critical for efficient budding of VLPs and virions. Specific sequences involved in self-assembly and membrane localization have yet to be defined precisely. However, recent reports have attempted to identify regions of VP40 that are important for its overall function in assembly and budding. For example, the amino acid region ₂₁₂KLR₂₁₄ located at the C-terminal region was found to be important for efficient release of eVP40 VLPs, with Leu₂₁₃ being the most critical (30). Mutation of the ₂₁₂KLR₂₁₄ region resulted in altered patterns of cellular localization and oligomerization of eVP40 compared to those of the wild-type genotype (30). In addition, the proline at position 53 was also implicated as being essential for eVP40 VLP release and plasma-membrane localization (54).In a more recent study, a YPLGVG motif within the M protein of Nipah virus (NiV) was shown to be important for stability, membrane binding, and budding of NiV VLPs (35). Whether this NiV M motif represents a new class of L domain remains to be determined. However, it is clear that this YPLGVG motif of NiV M is important for budding, perhaps involving a novel mechanism (35). Our rationale for investigating the corresponding, conserved motifs present within the Ebola and Marburg virus VP40 proteins was based primarily on these findings with NiV. In addition, Ebola virus VP40 motif maps close to the hinge region separating the N- and C-terminal domains of VP40 (4). Thus, the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif of eVP40 is predicted to be important for the overall stability and function of VP40 during egress. Findings presented here indicate that disruption of these filovirus VP40 motifs results in a severe defect in VLP budding, due in part to impairment in overall VP40 structure, stability and/or intracellular localization.