Prion Propagation: The Role of Protein Dynamics

The transfer of phenotypes from one individual to another is a fundamental aspect of biology. In addition to traditional nucleic acid-based genetic determinants, unique proteins known as prions can also act as elements of inheritance, infectivity, and disease. Nucleic acids and proteins encode genetic information in distinct ways, either in the sequence of bases in DNA or RNA or in the three dimensional structure of the polypeptide chain. Given these differences in the nature of the genetic repository, the mechanisms underlying the transmission of nucleic acid-based and protein-based phenotypes are necessarily distinct. While the appearance, persistence and transfer of nucleic acid determinants require the synthesis of new polymers, recent studies indicate that prions are propagated through dynamic transitions in the structure of existing protein.     

Yeast Prions: Evolution of the Prion Concept

Prions (infectious proteins) analogous to the scrapie agent have been identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Podospora anserina based on their special genetic characteristics. Each is a protein acting as a gene, much like nucleic acids have been shown to act as enzymes. The [URE3], [PSI⁺], [PIN⁺] and [Het-s] prions are self-propagating amyloids of Ure2p, Sup35p, Rnq1p and the HET-s protein, respectively. The [β] and [C] prions are enzymes whose precursor activation requires their own active form. [URE3] and [PSI⁺] are clearly diseases, while [Het-s] and [β] carry out normal cell functions. Surprisingly, the prion domains of Ure2p and Sup35p can be randomized without loss of ability to become a prion. Thus amino acid content and not sequence determine these prions. Shuffleability also suggests amyloids with a parallel in-register β-sheet structure.Key Words: Ure2, Sup35, Rnq1, HETs, PrP, prion, amyloid     

The Genetic Control of the Formation and Propagation of the [PSI+] Prion of Yeast

It is over 40 years since it was first reported that the yeast Saccahromyces cerevisiae contains two unusual cytoplasmic ‘genetic’ elements: [PSI⁺] and [URE3]. Remarkably the underlying determinants are protein-based rather than nucleic acid-based, i.e., that they are prions, and we have already learnt much about their inheritance and phenotypic effects from the application of ‘classical’ genetic studies alongside the more modern molecular, cellular and biochemical approaches. Of particular value has been the exploitation of chemical mutagens and ‘antagonistic’ mutants which directly affect the replication and/or transmission of yeast prions. In this Chapter we describe what has emerged from the application of classical and molecular genetic studies, to the most intensively studied of the three native yeast prions, the [PSI⁺] prion.Key Words: yeast, [PSI], prion, SUP35/eRF3, SUP45/eRF1, antisuppressor, [PSI⁺] maintenance genes, Hsp104, prion antagonists     

Yeast Prions

Prions (infectious proteins) analogous to the scrapie agent have been identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Podospora anserina based on their special genetic characteristics. Each is a protein acting as a gene, much like nucleic acids have been shown to act as enzymes. The [URE3], [PSI+], [PIN+] and [Het-s] prions are self-propagating amyloids of Ure2p, Sup35p, Rnq1p and the HET-s protein, respectively. The [b] and [C] prions are enzymes whose precursor activation requires their own active form. [URE3] and [PSI+] are clearly diseases, while [Het-s] and [b] carry out normal cell functions. Surprisingly, the prion domains of Ure2p and Sup35p can be randomized without loss of ability to become a prion. Thus amino acid content and not sequence determine these prions. Shuffleability also suggests amyloids with a parallel in-register b-sheet structure.     

A Short History of Small s: A Prion of the Fungus Podospora anserina

Prions are infectious proteins. In fungi, prions correspond to non-Mendelian genetic elements whose mode of inheritance has long eluded explanation. The [Het-s] cytoplasmic genetic element of the filamentous fungus Podospora anserina, was originally identified in 1952 and recognized as a prion nearly half a century later. The present chapter will attempt to describe the work on [Het-s] from a historical perspective. The initial characterization and early genetic and physiological studies of [Het-s] are described together with the isolation of the [Het-s] encoding gene. More recent work that led to the construction of a structural model for this prion is also discussed.Key Words: prion, Podospora anserina, amyloid, filamentous fungi, maternal inheritance, heterokaryon incompatibility, cell death, epigenetics     

The Genetic Control of the Formation and Propagation of the [PSI+] Prion of Yeast

It is over 40 years since it was first reported that the yeast Saccahromyces cerevisiae contains two unusual cytoplasmic ‘genetic’ elements: [PSI+] and [URE3]. Remarkably the underlying determinants are protein-based rather than nucleic acid-based, i.e., that they are prions, and we have already learned much about their inheritance and phenotypic effects from the application of ‘classical’ genetic studies alongside the more modern molecular, cellular and biochemical approaches. Of particular value has been the exploitation of chemical mutagens and ‘antagonistic’ mutants which directly affect the replication and/or transmission of yeast prions. In this chapter we describe what has emerged from the application of classical and molecular genetic studies, to the most intensively studied of the three native yeast prions, the [PSI+] prion.     

Strategies for identifying new prions in yeast

The unexpected discovery of two prions, [URE3] and [PSI⁺], in Saccharomyces cerevisiae led to questions about how many other proteins could undergo similar prion-based structural conversions. However, [URE3] and [PSI⁺] were discovered by serendipity in genetic screens. Cataloging the full range of prions in yeast or in other organisms will therefore require more systematic search methods. Taking advantage of some of the unique features of prions, various researchers have developed bioinformatic and experimental methods for identifying novel prion proteins. These methods have generated long lists of prion candidates. The systematic testing of some of these prion candidates has led to notable successes; however, even in yeast, where rapid growth rate and ease of genetic manipulation aid in testing for prion activity, such candidate testing is laborious. Development of better methods to winnow the field of prion candidates will greatly aid in the discovery of new prions, both in yeast and in other organisms, and help us to better understand the role of prions in biology.Key words: yeast, prion, bioinformatics, Sup35, [PSI⁺], Ure2, [URE3]     

Functional Diversification of Hsp40: Distinct J-Protein Functional Requirements for Two Prions Allow for Chaperone-Dependent Prion Selection

Yeast prions are heritable amyloid aggregates of functional yeast proteins; their propagation to subsequent cell generations is dependent upon fragmentation of prion protein aggregates by molecular chaperone proteins. Mounting evidence indicates the J-protein Sis1 may act as an amyloid specificity factor, recognizing prion and other amyloid aggregates and enabling Ssa and Hsp104 to act in prion fragmentation. Chaperone interactions with prions, however, can be affected by variations in amyloid-core structure resulting in distinct prion variants or ‘strains’. Our genetic analysis revealed that Sis1 domain requirements by distinct variants of [PSI ⁺] are strongly dependent upon overall variant stability. Notably, multiple strong [PSI ⁺] variants can be maintained by a minimal construct of Sis1 consisting of only the J-domain and glycine/phenylalanine-rich (G/F) region that was previously shown to be sufficient for cell viability and [RNQ ⁺] prion propagation. In contrast, weak [PSI ⁺] variants are lost under the same conditions but maintained by the expression of an Sis1 construct that lacks only the G/F region and cannot support [RNQ ⁺] propagation, revealing mutually exclusive requirements for Sis1 function between these two prions. Prion loss is not due to [PSI ⁺]-dependent toxicity or dependent upon a particular yeast genetic background. These observations necessitate that Sis1 must have at least two distinct functional roles that individual prions differentially require for propagation and which are localized to the glycine-rich domains of the Sis1. Based on these distinctions, Sis1 plasmid-shuffling in a [PSI ⁺]/[RNQ ⁺] strain permitted J-protein-dependent prion selection for either prion. We also found that, despite an initial report to the contrary, the human homolog of Sis1, Hdj1, is capable of [PSI ⁺] prion propagation in place of Sis1. This conservation of function is also prion-variant dependent, indicating that only one of the two Sis1-prion functions may have been maintained in eukaryotic chaperone evolution.     

The yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] are molecular degenerative diseases

The yeast prions [URE3] and [PSI] are not found in wild strains, suggesting they are not an advantage. Prion-forming ability is not conserved, even within Saccharomyces, suggesting it is a disease. Prion domains have non-prion functions, explaining some conservation of sequence. However, in spite of the sequence being constrained in evolution by these non-prion functions, the prion domains vary more rapidly than the remainder of the molecule, and these changes produce a transmission barrier, suggesting that these changes were selected to block prion infection. Yeast prions [PSI] and [URE3] induce a cellular stress response (Hsp104 and Hsp70 induction), suggesting the cells are not happy about being infected. Recently, we showed that the array of [PSI] and [URE3] prions includes a majority of lethal or very toxic variants, a result not expected if either prion were an adaptive cellular response to stress.Key words: [URE3], [PSI⁺], prion, Sup35p, Ure2pfMammalian prions are uniformly fatal, but a lethal yeast prion would not be detected by the usual procedure, which requires growth of a colony under some selective condition. As a result, the prion variants commonly studied are quite mild in their effects. This circumstance has led to the suggestion that yeast prions actually benefit their host. Sup35p, the translation termination subunit whose amyloid becomes the [PSI⁺] prion, is essential for growth and Ure2p, the nitrogen regulation protein whose amyloid constitutes the [URE3] prion, is important for growth, with ure2 mutants showing noticeably slowed growth.When yeast prions were discovered,¹ we assumed they were diseases, by analogy with the mammalian diseases and the many non-prion amyloid diseases. Inactivating the essential Sup35p or the desireable Ure2p did not seem like a useful strategy. While control of either protein''s activity might be advantageous, and Ure2p activity control is the key to regulation of nitrogen catabolism, prion formation is a stochastic process, so it makes control of activity of these proteins random instead of appropriate to the circumstances. The [Het-s] prion changed that picture.² Here was a prion necessary for a normal function, heterokaryon incompatibility, and we suggested that it was the first beneficial prion.³     

Hsp40s Specify Functions of Hsp104 and Hsp90 Protein Chaperone Machines

Hsp100 family chaperones of microorganisms and plants cooperate with the Hsp70/Hsp40/NEF system to resolubilize and reactivate stress-denatured proteins. In yeast this machinery also promotes propagation of prions by fragmenting prion polymers. We previously showed the bacterial Hsp100 machinery cooperates with the yeast Hsp40 Ydj1 to support yeast thermotolerance and with the yeast Hsp40 Sis1 to propagate [PSI⁺] prions. Here we find these Hsp40s similarly directed specific activities of the yeast Hsp104-based machinery. By assessing the ability of Ydj1-Sis1 hybrid proteins to complement Ydj1 and Sis1 functions we show their C-terminal substrate-binding domains determined distinctions in these and other cellular functions of Ydj1 and Sis1. We find propagation of [URE3] prions was acutely sensitive to alterations in Sis1 activity, while that of [PIN⁺] prions was less sensitive than [URE3], but more sensitive than [PSI⁺]. These findings support the ideas that overexpressing Ydj1 cures [URE3] by competing with Sis1 for interaction with the Hsp104-based disaggregation machine, and that different prions rely differently on activity of this machinery, which can explain the various ways they respond to alterations in chaperone function.     

The [RNQ+] prion: A model of both functional and pathological amyloid

The formation of fibrillar amyloid is most often associated with protein conformational disorders such as prion diseases, Alzheimer disease and Huntington disease. Interestingly, however, an increasing number of studies suggest that amyloid structures can sometimes play a functional role in normal biology. Several proteins form self-propagating amyloids called prions in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These unique elements operate by creating a reversible, epigenetic change in phenotype. While the function of the non-prion conformation of the Rnq1 protein is unclear, the prion form, [RNQ⁺], acts to facilitate the de novo formation of other prions to influence cellular phenotypes. The [RNQ⁺] prion itself does not adversely affect the growth of yeast, but the overexpression of Rnq1p can form toxic aggregated structures that are not necessarily prions. The [RNQ⁺] prion is also involved in dictating the aggregation and toxicity of polyglutamine proteins ectopically expressed in yeast. Thus, the [RNQ⁺] prion provides a tractable model that has the potential to reveal significant insight into the factors that dictate how amyloid structures are initiated and propagated in both physiological and pathological contexts.Key words: [RNQ⁺], [PSI⁺], prion, polyglutamine, functional amyloid, toxic amyloid, chaperones, epigenetic     

Protein inheritance (prions) based on parallel in-register beta-sheet amyloid structures

Most prions (infectious proteins) are self-propagating amyloids (filamentous protein multimers), and have been found in both mammals and fungal species. The prions [URE3] and [PSI+] of yeast are disease agents of Saccharomyces cerevisiae while [Het-s] of Podospora anserina may serve a normal cellular function. The parallel in-register beta-sheet structure shown by prion amyloids makes possible a templating action at the end of filaments which explains the faithful transmission of variant differences in these molecules. This property of self-reproduction, in turn, allows these proteins to act as de facto genes, encoding heritable information.     

Strategies for identifying new prions in yeast

The unexpected discovery of two prions, [URE3] and [PSI⁺], in Saccharomyces cerevisiae led to questions about how many other proteins could undergo similar prion-based structural conversions. However, [URE3] and [PSI⁺] were discovered by serendipity in genetic screens. Cataloging the full range of prions in yeast or in other organisms will therefore require more systematic search methods. Taking advantage of some of the unique features of prions, various researchers have developed bioinformatic and experimental methods for identifying novel prion proteins. These methods have generated long lists of prion candidates. The systematic testing of some of these prion candidates has led to notable successes; however, even in yeast, where rapid growth rate and ease of genetic manipulation aid in testing for prion activity, such candidate testing is laborious. Development of better methods to winnow the field of prion candidates will greatly aid in the discovery of new prions, both in yeast and in other organisms, and help us to better understand the role of prions in biology.     

Yeast Prions Compared to Functional Prions and Amyloids

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an occasional host to an array of prions, most based on self-propagating, self-templating amyloid filaments of a normally soluble protein. [URE3] is a prion of Ure2p, a regulator of nitrogen catabolism, while [PSI +] is a prion of Sup35p, a subunit of the translation termination factor Sup35p. In contrast to the functional prions, [Het-s] of Podospora anserina and [BETA] of yeast, the amyloid-based yeast prions are rare in wild strains, arise sporadically, have an array of prion variants for a single prion protein sequence, have a folded in-register parallel β-sheet amyloid architecture, are detrimental to their hosts, arouse a stress response in the host, and are subject to curing by various host anti-prion systems. These characteristics allow a logical basis for distinction between functional amyloids/prions and prion diseases. These infectious yeast amyloidoses are outstanding models for the many common human amyloid-based diseases that are increasingly found to have some infectious characteristics.     

Genomic clustering and homology between HET-S and the NWD2 STAND protein in various fungal genomes

Background

Prions are infectious proteins propagating as self-perpetuating amyloid polymers. The [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina is involved in a cell death process associated with non-self recognition. The prion forming domain (PFD) of HET-s adopts a β-solenoid amyloid structure characterized by the two fold repetition of an elementary triangular motif. [Het-s] induces cell death when interacting with HET-S, an allelic variant of HET-s. When templated by [Het-s], HET-S undergoes a trans-conformation, relocates to the cell membrane and induces toxicity.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here, comparing HET-s homologs from different species, we devise a consensus for the HET-s elementary triangular motif. We use this motif to screen genomic databases and find a match to the N-terminus of NWD2, a STAND protein, encoded by the gene immediately adjacent to het-S. STAND proteins are signal transducing ATPases which undergo ligand-induced oligomerisation. Homology modelling predicts that the NWD2 N-terminal region adopts a HET-s-like fold. We propose that upon NWD2 oligomerisation, these N-terminal extensions adopt the β-solenoid fold and template HET-S to adopt the amyloid fold and trigger toxicity. We extend this model to a putative prion, the σ infectious element in Nectria haematococca, because the s locus controlling propagation of σ also encodes a STAND protein and displays analogous features. Comparative genomic analyses indicate evolutionary conservation of these STAND/prion-like gene pairs, identify a number of novel prion candidates and define, in addition to the HET-s PFD motif, two distinct, novel putative PFD-like motifs.

Conclusions/Significance

We suggest the existence, in the fungal kingdom, of a widespread and evolutionarily conserved mode of signal transduction based on the transmission of an amyloid-fold from a NOD-like STAND receptor protein to an effector protein.     

Yeast prions, mammalian amyloidoses, and the problem of proteomic networks

Prion proteins are infective amyloids and cause several neurodegenerative diseases in humans and animals. In yeasts, prions are detected as the cytoplasmic heritable determinants of a protein nature. Yeast prion [PSI], which results from a conformational rearrangement and oligomerization of translation termination factor eRF3, is used as an example to consider the structural-functional relationships in a potentially prion molecule, specifics of its evolution, and interactions with other prions, which form so-called prion networks. In addition, the review considers the results of modeling mammalian prion diseases and other amyloidoses in yeast cells. A hypothesis of proteomic networks is proposed by analogy with prion networks, involving interactions of different amyloids in mammals.     

The sensitive [SWI+] prion

Yeast prions are heritable protein-based genetic elements which rely on molecular chaperone proteins for stable transmission to cell progeny. Within the past few years, five new prions have been validated and 18 additional putative prions identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The exploration of the physical and biological properties of these “nouveau prions” has begun to reveal the extent of prion diversity in yeast. We recently reported that one such prion, [SWI⁺], differs from the best studied, archetypal prion [PSI⁺] in several significant ways.¹ Notably, [SWI⁺] is highly sensitive to alterations in Hsp70 system chaperone activity and is lost upon growth at elevated temperatures. In that report we briefly noted a correlation amongst prions regarding amino acid composition, seed number and sensitivity to the activity of the Hsp70 chaperone system. Here we extend that analysis and put forth the idea that [SWI⁺] may be representative of a class of asparagine-rich yeast prions which also includes [URE3], [MOT3⁺] and [ISP⁺], distinct from the glutamine-rich prions such as [PSI⁺] and [RNQ⁺]. While much work remains, it is apparent that our understanding of the extent of the diversity of prion characteristics is in its infancy.     

Distinct Type of Transmission Barrier Revealed by Study of Multiple Prion Determinants of Rnq1

Prions are self-propagating protein conformations. Transmission of the prion state between non-identical proteins, e.g. between homologous proteins from different species, is frequently inefficient. Transmission barriers are attributed to sequence differences in prion proteins, but their underlying mechanisms are not clear. Here we use a yeast Rnq1/[PIN⁺]-based experimental system to explore the nature of transmission barriers. [PIN⁺], the prion form of Rnq1, is common in wild and laboratory yeast strains, where it facilitates the appearance of other prions. Rnq1''s prion domain carries four discrete QN-rich regions. We start by showing that Rnq1 encompasses multiple prion determinants that can independently drive amyloid formation in vitro and transmit the [PIN⁺] prion state in vivo. Subsequent analysis of [PIN⁺] transmission between Rnq1 fragments with different sets of prion determinants established that (i) one common QN-rich region is required and usually sufficient for the transmission; (ii) despite identical sequences of the common QNs, such transmissions are impeded by barriers of different strength. Existence of transmission barriers in the absence of amino acid mismatches in transmitting regions indicates that in complex prion domains multiple prion determinants act cooperatively to attain the final prion conformation, and reveals transmission barriers determined by this cooperative fold.     

Prion propagation by Hsp40 molecular chaperones

Molecular chaperones regulate essential steps in the propagation of yeast prions. Yeast prions possess domains enriched in glutamines and asparagines that act as templates to drive the assembly of native proteins into beta-sheet-rich, amyloid-like fibrils. Several recent studies highlight a significant and complex function for Hsp40 co-chaperones in propagation of prion elements in yeast. Hsp40 co-chaperones bind non-native polypeptides and transfer these clients to Hsp70s for refolding or degradation. How Hsp40 co-chaperones bind amyloid-like prion conformers that are enriched in hydrophilic residues such as glutamines and asparagines is a significant question in the field. Interestingly, selective recognition of amyloid-like conformers by distinct Hsp40s appears to confer opposing actions on prion assembly. For example, the Type I Hsp40 Ydj1 and Type II Hsp40 Sis1 bind different regions within the prion protein Rnq1 and function respectively to inhibit or promote [RNQ⁺] prion assembly. Thus, substrate selectivity enables distinct Hsp40s to act at unique steps in prion propagation.Key words: Hsp40, Ydj1, Sis1, amyloid, prion, Rnq1, J-protein, Hsp70