A study of the membrane-water interface region of membrane proteins

The most conspicuous structural characteristic of the alpha-helical membrane proteins is their long transmembrane alpha-helices. However, other structural elements, as yet largely ignored in statistical studies of membrane protein structure, are found in those parts of the protein that are located in the membrane-water interface region. Here, we show that this region is enriched in irregular structure and in interfacial helices running roughly parallel with the membrane surface, while beta-strands are extremely rare. The average amino acid composition is different between the interfacial helices, the parts of the transmembrane helices located in the interface region, and the irregular structures. In this region, hydrophobic and aromatic residues tend to point toward the membrane and charged/polar residues tend to point away from the membrane. The interface region thus imposes different constraints on protein structure than do the central hydrocarbon core of the membrane and the surrounding aqueous phase.     

M13 procoat protein insertion into YidC and SecYEG proteoliposomes and liposomes

M13 procoat protein was one of the first model proteins used to study bacterial membrane protein insertion. It contains a signal peptide of 23 amino acid residues and is not membrane targeted by the signal recognition particle. The translocation of its periplasmic domain is independent of the preprotein translocase (SecAYEG) but requires electrochemical membrane potential and the membrane insertase YidC of Escherichia coli. We show here that YidC is sufficient for efficient membrane insertion of the purified M13 procoat protein into energized YidC proteoliposomes. When no membrane potential is applied, the insertion is substantially reduced. Only in the presence of YidC, membrane insertion occurs if bilayer integrity is preserved and membrane potential is stable for more than 20 min. A mutant of the M13 procoat protein, H5EE, with two additional negatively charged residues in the periplasmic domain inserted into YidC proteoliposomes and SecYEG proteoliposomes with equal efficiencies. We conclude that the protein can use both the YidC-only pathway and the Sec pathway. This poses the questions of how procoat H5EE is inserted in vivo and how insertion pathways are selected in the cell.     

Helix packing moments reveal diversity and conservation in membrane protein structure

Helical membrane proteins are more tightly packed and the packing interactions are more diverse than those found in helical soluble proteins. Based on a linear correlation between amino acid packing values and interhelical propensity, we propose the concept of a helix packing moment to predict the orientation of helices in helical membrane proteins and membrane protein complexes. We show that the helix packing moment correlates with the helix interfaces of helix dimers of single pass membrane proteins of known structure. Helix packing moments are also shown to help identify the packing interfaces in membrane proteins with multiple transmembrane helices, where a single helix can have multiple contact surfaces. Analyses are described on class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with seven transmembrane helices. We show that the helix packing moments are conserved across the class A family of GPCRs and correspond to key structural contacts in rhodopsin. These contacts are distinct from the highly conserved signature motifs of GPCRs and have not previously been recognized. The specific amino acid types involved in these contacts, however, are not necessarily conserved between subfamilies of GPCRs, indicating that the same protein architecture can be supported by a diverse set of interactions. In GPCRs, as well as membrane channels and transporters, amino acid residues with small side-chains (Gly, Ala, Ser, Cys) allow tight helix packing by mediating strong van der Waals interactions between helices. Closely packed helices, in turn, facilitate interhelical hydrogen bonding of both weakly polar (Ser, Thr, Cys) and strongly polar (Asn, Gln, Glu, Asp, His, Arg, Lys) amino acid residues. We propose the use of the helix packing moment as a complementary tool to the helical hydrophobic moment in the analysis of transmembrane sequences.     

Sequence context and modified hydrophobic moment plots help identify 'horizontal' surface helices in transmembrane protein structure prediction

Transmembrane proteins make up at least one-fifth of the genome of most organisms and are critical components of key pathways for cell survival and interactions with the environment. The function of helices found at the membrane surface in transmembrane proteins has not been greatly explored, but it is likely that they play an ancillary role to membrane spanning helices and are analogous to the surface active helices of peripheral membrane proteins, being involved in: lipid association, membrane perturbation, transmembrane signal transduction and regulation, and transmembrane helical bundle formation. Due to the difficulties in obtaining high-resolution structural data for this class of proteins, structure-from-sequence predictive methods continue to be developed as a means to obtain structural models for these largely intractable systems. A simple but effective variant of the hydrophobic moment analysis of amino acid sequences is described here as part of a protocol for distinguishing helical sequences that are parallel to or 'horizontal' at the membrane bilayer/aqueous phase interface from helices that are membrane-embedded or located in extra-membranous domains. This protocol when tested on transmembrane spanning protein amino acid sequences not used in its development, was found to be 84-91% accurate when the results were compared to the partition locations in the corresponding structures determined by X-ray crystallography, and 72% accurate in determining which helices lie horizontal or near horizontal at the lipid interface.     

Predicted membrane topology of the coronavirus protein E1

The structure of the envelope protein E1 of two coronaviruses, mouse hepatitis virus strain A59 and infectious bronchitis virus, was analyzed by applying several theoretical methods to their amino acid sequence. The results of these analyses combined with earlier data on the orientation and protease sensitivity of E1 assembled in microsomal membranes lead to a topological model. According to this model, the protein is anchored in the lipid bilayer by three successive membrane-spanning helices present in its N-terminal half whereas the C-terminal part is thought to be associated with the membrane surface; these interactions with the membrane protect almost the complete polypeptide against protease digestion. In addition, it is predicted that the insertion of E1 into the membrane occurs by the recognition of the internal transmembrane region(s) as a signal sequence.     

The energetics of transmembrane helix insertion into a lipid bilayer

Free energy profiles for insertion of a hydrophobic transmembrane protein α-helix (M2 from CFTR) into a lipid bilayer have been calculated using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations and umbrella sampling to yield potentials of mean force along a reaction path corresponding to translation of a helix across a lipid bilayer. The calculated free energy of insertion is smaller when a bilayer with a thinner hydrophobic region is used. The free energies of insertion from the potentials of mean force are compared with those derived from a number of hydrophobicity scales and with those derived from translocon-mediated insertion. This comparison supports recent models of translocon-mediated insertion and in particular suggests that: 1), helices in an about-to-be-inserted state may be located in a hydrophobic region somewhat thinner than the core of a lipid bilayer; and/or 2), helices in a not-to-be-inserted state may experience an environment more akin (e.g., in polarity/hydrophobicity) to the bilayer/water interface than to bulk water.     

Membrane protein assembly: Rules of the game

Integral membrane proteins are found in all cellular membranes and fulfil many of the functions that are central to life. A critical step in the biosynthesis of membrane proteins is their insertion into the lipid bilayer. The mechanisms of membrane protein insertion and folding are becoming increasingly better understood, and efficient methods for the ab initio prediction of three-dimensional protein structure from the primary amino acid sequence may be within reach. Already, the basic tools needed for engineering and de novo design of integral membrane proteins seem to be at hand.     

Truncated forms of Escherichia coli lactose permease: models for study of biosynthesis and membrane insertion.

Using in vitro DNA manipulations, we constructed different lacY alleles encoding mutant proteins of the Escherichia coli lactose carrier. With respect to structural models developed for lactose permease, the truncated polypeptides represent model systems containing approximately one, two, four, and five of the N-terminal membrane-spanning alpha-helices. In addition, a protein carrying a deletion of predicted helices 3 and 4 was obtained. The different proteins were radiolabeled in plasmid-bearing E. coli minicells and were found to be stably integrated into the lipid bilayer. The truncated polypeptides of 50, 71, 143, and 174 N-terminal amino acid residues resembled the wild-type protein in their solubilization characteristics, whereas the mutant protein carrying an internal deletion of amino acid residues 72 to 142 of the lactose carrier behaved differently. Minicell membrane vesicles containing truncated proteins comprising amino acid residues 1 to 143 or 1 to 174 were subjected to limited proteolysis. Upon digestion with proteases of different specificities, the same characteristic fragment that was also produced from the membrane-associated wild-type protein was found to accumulate under these conditions. It has previously been shown to contain the intact N terminus of lactose permease. This supports the idea of an independent folding and membrane insertion of this segment even in the absence of the C-terminal part of the molecule. The results suggest that the N-terminal region of the lactose permease represents a well-defined structural domain.     

Self-assembly of single integral membrane proteins into soluble nanoscale phospholipid bilayers

One of the biggest challenges in pharmaceutical research is obtaining integral membrane proteins in a functional, solubilized, and monodisperse state that provides a native-like environment that maintains the spectrum of in vivo activities. Many of these integral membrane proteins are receptors, enzymes, or other macromolecular assemblies that are important drug targets. An example is the general class of proteins composed of seven-transmembrane segments (7-TM) as exemplified by the G-protein-coupled receptors. In this article, we describe a simple system for self-assembling bacteriorhodopsin, as a model protein containing 7-TM helices, with phospholipids to form a nanometer-scale soluble bilayer structure encircled by a 200 amino acid scaffold protein. The result is the single molecule incorporation of an integral membrane protein target into a soluble and monodisperse structure that allows the structural and functional tools of solution biochemistry to be applied.     

Empirical lipid propensities of amino acid residues in multispan alpha helical membrane proteins

Characterizing the interactions between amino acid residues and lipid molecules is important for understanding the assembly of transmembrane helices and for studying membrane protein folding. In this study we develop TMLIP (TransMembrane helix-LIPid), an empirically derived propensity of individual residue types to face lipid membrane based on statistical analysis of high-resolution structures of membrane proteins. Lipid accessibilities of amino acid residues within the transmembrane (TM) region of 29 structures of helical membrane proteins are studied with a spherical probe of radius of 1.9 A. Our results show that there are characteristic preferences for residues to face the headgroup region and the hydrocarbon core region of lipid membrane. Amino acid residues Lys, Arg, Trp, Phe, and Leu are often found exposed at the headgroup regions of the membrane, where they have high propensity to face phospholipid headgroups and glycerol backbones. In the hydrocarbon core region, the strongest preference for interacting with lipids is observed for Ile, Leu, Phe and Val. Small and polar amino acid residues are usually buried inside helical bundles and are strongly lipophobic. There is a strong correlation between various hydrophobicity scales and the propensity of a given residue to face the lipids in the hydrocarbon region of the bilayer. Our data suggest a possibly significant contribution of the lipophobic effect to the folding of membrane proteins. This study shows that membrane proteins have exceedingly apolar exteriors rather than highly polar interiors. Prediction of lipid-facing surfaces of boundary helices using TMLIP1 results in a 54% accuracy, which is significantly better than random (25% accuracy). We also compare performance of TMLIP with another lipid propensity scale, kPROT, and with several hydrophobicity scales using hydrophobic moment analysis.     

The importance of the membrane interface as the reference state for membrane protein stability

The insertion of nascent polypeptide chains into lipid bilayer membranes and the stability of membrane proteins crucially depend on the equilibrium partitioning of polypeptides. For this, the transfer of full sequences of amino-acid residues into the bilayer, rather than individual amino acids, must be understood. Earlier studies have revealed that the most likely reference state for partitioning very hydrophobic sequences is the membrane interface. We have used μs-scale simulations to calculate the interface-to-transmembrane partitioning free energies ΔG_S→TM for two hydrophobic carrier sequences in order to estimate the insertion free energy for all 20 amino acid residues when bonded to the center of a partitioning hydrophobic peptide. Our results show that prior single-residue scales likely overestimate the partitioning free energies of polypeptides. The correlation of ΔG_S→TM with experimental full-peptide translocon insertion data is high, suggesting an important role for the membrane interface in translocon-based insertion. The choice of carrier sequence greatly modulates the contribution of each single-residue mutation to the overall partitioning free energy. Our results demonstrate the importance of quantifying the observed full-peptide partitioning equilibrium, which is between membrane interface and transmembrane inserted, rather than combining individual water-to-membrane amino acid transfer free energies.     

Marginally hydrophobic transmembrane α‐helices shaping membrane protein folding

Cells have developed an incredible machinery to facilitate the insertion of membrane proteins into the membrane. While we have a fairly good understanding of the mechanism and determinants of membrane integration, more data is needed to understand the insertion of membrane proteins with more complex insertion and folding pathways. This review will focus on marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helices and their influence on membrane protein folding. These weakly hydrophobic transmembrane segments are by themselves not recognized by the translocon and therefore rely on local sequence context for membrane integration. How can such segments reside within the membrane? We will discuss this in the light of features found in the protein itself as well as the environment it resides in. Several characteristics in proteins have been described to influence the insertion of marginally hydrophobic helices. Additionally, the influence of biological membranes is significant. To begin with, the actual cost for having polar groups within the membrane may not be as high as expected; the presence of proteins in the membrane as well as characteristics of some amino acids may enable a transmembrane helix to harbor a charged residue. The lipid environment has also been shown to directly influence the topology as well as membrane boundaries of transmembrane helices—implying a dynamic relationship between membrane proteins and their environment.     

Intra-Helical Salt Bridge Contribution to Membrane Protein Insertion

Salt bridges between negatively (D, E) and positively charged (K, R, H) amino acids play an important role in protein stabilization. This has a more prevalent effect in membrane proteins where polar amino acids are exposed to a hydrophobic environment. In transmembrane (TM) helices the presence of charged residues can hinder the insertion of the helices into the membrane. It is possible that the formation of salt bridges could decrease the cost of membrane integration. However, the presence of intra-helical salt bridges in TM domains and their effect on insertion has not been properly studied yet. In this work, we show that potentially salt-bridge forming pairs are statistically over-represented in TM-helices. We then selected some candidates to experimentally determine the contribution of these electrostatic interactions to the translocon-assisted membrane insertion process. Using both in vitro and whole cell systems, we confirm the presence of intra-helical salt bridges in TM segments during biogenesis and determined that they contribute ～0.5 kcal/mol to the apparent free energy of membrane insertion (ΔG_app). Our observations suggest that salt bridge interactions can be stabilized during translocon-mediated insertion and thus could be relevant to consider for the future development of membrane protein prediction software.     

Lipid-destabilizing properties of the hydrophobic helices H8 and H9 from colicin E1

Colicins are toxic proteins produced by Escherichia coli that must cross the membrane to exert their activity. The lipid insertion of their pf domain is linked to a conformational change which enables the penetration of a hydrophobic hairpin. They provide useful models to more generally study insertion of proteins, channel formation and protein translocation in and across membranes. In this paper, we study the lipid-destabilizing properties of helices H8 and H9 forming the hydrophobic hairpin of colicin E1. Modelling analysis suggests that those fragments behave like tilted peptides. The latter are characterized by an asymmetric distribution of their hydrophobic residues when helical. They are able to interact with a hydrophobic/hydrophilic interface (such as a lipid membrane) and to destabilize the organized system into which they insert. Fluorescence techniques using labelled liposomes clearly show that H9, and H8 to a lesser extent, destabilize lipid particles, by inducing fusion and leakage. AFM assays clearly indicate that H8 and especially H9 induce membrane fragilization. Holes in the membrane are even observed in the presence of H9. This behaviour is close to what is seen with viral fusion peptides. Those results suggest that the peptides could be involved in the toroidal pore formation of colicin E1, notably by disturbing the lipids and facilitating the insertion of the other, more hydrophilic, helices that will form the pore. Since tilted, lipid-destabilizing fragments are also common to membrane proteins and to signal sequences, we suggest that tilted peptides should have an ubiquitous role in the mechanism of insertion of proteins into membranes.     

Comprehensive analysis of the numbers,lengths and amino acid compositions of transmembrane helices in prokaryotic,eukaryotic and viral integral membrane proteins of high-resolution structure

We report a comprehensive analysis of the numbers, lengths and amino acid compositions of transmembrane helices in 235 high-resolution structures of integral membrane proteins. The properties of 1551 transmembrane helices in the structures were compared with those obtained by analysis of the same amino acid sequences using topology prediction tools. Explanations for the 81 (5.2%) missing or additional transmembrane helices in the prediction results were identified. Main reasons for missing transmembrane helices were mis-identification of N-terminal signal peptides, breaks in α-helix conformation or charged residues in the middle of transmembrane helices and transmembrane helices with unusual amino acid composition. The main reason for additional transmembrane helices was mis-identification of amphipathic helices, extramembrane helices or hairpin re-entrant loops. Transmembrane helix length had an overall median of 24 residues and an average of 24.9 ± 7.0 residues and the most common length was 23 residues. The overall content of residues in transmembrane helices as a percentage of the full proteins had a median of 56.8% and an average of 55.7 ± 16.0%. Amino acid composition was analysed for the full proteins, transmembrane helices and extramembrane regions. Individual proteins or types of proteins with transmembrane helices containing extremes in contents of individual amino acids or combinations of amino acids with similar physicochemical properties were identified and linked to structure and/or function. In addition to overall median and average values, all results were analysed for proteins originating from different types of organism (prokaryotic, eukaryotic, viral) and for subgroups of receptors, channels, transporters and others.     

Sequence and conformational preferences at termini of α‐helices in membrane proteins: Role of the helix environment

α‐helices are amongst the most common secondary structural elements seen in membrane proteins and are packed in the form of helix bundles. These α‐helices encounter varying external environments (hydrophobic, hydrophilic) that may influence the sequence preferences at their N and C‐termini. The role of the external environment in stabilization of the helix termini in membrane proteins is still unknown. Here we analyze α‐helices in a high‐resolution dataset of integral α‐helical membrane proteins and establish that their sequence and conformational preferences differ from those in globular proteins. We specifically examine these preferences at the N and C‐termini in helices initiating/terminating inside the membrane core as well as in linkers connecting these transmembrane helices. We find that the sequence preferences and structural motifs at capping (Ncap and Ccap) and near‐helical (N' and C') positions are influenced by a combination of features including the membrane environment and the innate helix initiation and termination property of residues forming structural motifs. We also find that a large number of helix termini which do not form any particular capping motif are stabilized by formation of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions contributed from the neighboring helices in the membrane protein. We further validate the sequence preferences obtained from our analysis with data from an ultradeep sequencing study that identifies evolutionarily conserved amino acids in the rat neurotensin receptor. The results from our analysis provide insights for the secondary structure prediction, modeling and design of membrane proteins. Proteins 2014; 82:3420–3436. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Lipid-destabilizing properties of the hydrophobic helices H8 and H9 from colicin E1

Colicins are toxic proteins produced by Escherichia coli that must cross the membrane to exert their activity. The lipid insertion of their pf domain is linked to a conformational change which enables the penetration of a hydrophobic hairpin. They provide useful models to more generally study insertion of proteins, channel formation and protein translocation in and across membranes. In this paper, we study the lipid-destabilizing properties of helices H8 and H9 forming the hydrophobic hairpin of colicin E1. Modelling analysis suggests that those fragments behave like tilted peptides. The latter are characterized by an asymmetric distribution of their hydrophobic residues when helical. They are able to interact with a hydrophobic/hydrophilic interface (such as a lipid membrane) and to destabilize the organized system into which they insert. Fluorescence techniques using labelled liposomes clearly show that H9, and H8 to a lesser extent, destabilize lipid particles, by inducing fusion and leakage. AFM assays clearly indicate that H8 and especially H9 induce membrane fragilization. Holes in the membrane are even observed in the presence of H9. This behaviour is close to what is seen with viral fusion peptides. Those results suggest that the peptides could be involved in the toroidal pore formation of colicin E1, notably by disturbing the lipids and facilitating the insertion of the other, more hydrophilic, helices that will form the pore. Since tilted, lipid-destabilizing fragments are also common to membrane proteins and to signal sequences, we suggest that tilted peptides should have an ubiquitous role in the mechanism of insertion of proteins into membranes.     

Position-resolved free energy of solvation for amino acids in lipid membranes from molecular dynamics simulations

Studies of insertion and interactions of amino acids in lipid membranes are pivotal to our understanding of membrane protein structure and function. Calculating the insertion cost as a function of transmembrane helix sequence is thus an important step towards improved membrane protein prediction and eventually drug design. Here, we present position-dependent free energies of solvation for all amino acid analogs along the membrane normal. The profiles cover the entire region from bulk water to hydrophobic core, and were produced from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Experimental differences corresponding to mutations and costs for entire segments match experimental data well, and in addition the profiles provide the spatial resolution currently not available from experiments. Polar side-chains largely maintain their hydration and assume quite ordered conformations, which indicates the solvation cost is mainly entropic. The cost of solvating charged side-chains is not only significantly lower than for implicit solvation models, but also close to experiments, meaning these could well maintain their protonation states inside the membrane. The single notable exception to the experimental agreement is proline, which is quite expensive to introduce in vivo despite its hydrophobicity--a difference possibly explained by kinks making it harder to insert helices in the translocon.     

Structural and Functional Profiling of the Lateral Gate of the Sec61 Translocon

The evolutionarily conserved Sec61 translocon mediates the translocation and membrane insertion of proteins. For the integration of proteins into the membrane, the Sec61 translocon opens laterally to the lipid bilayer. Previous studies suggest that the lateral opening of the channel is mediated by the helices TM2b and TM7 of a pore-forming subunit of the Sec61 translocon. To map key residues in TM2b and TM7 in yeast Sec61 that modulate lateral gating activity, we performed alanine scanning and in vivo site-directed photocross-linking experiments. Alanine scanning identified two groups of critical residues in the lateral gate, one group that leads to defects in the translocation and membrane insertion of proteins and the other group that causes faster translocation and facilitates membrane insertion. Photocross-linking data show that the former group of residues is located at the interface of the lateral gate. Furthermore, different degrees of defects for the membrane insertion of single- and double-spanning membrane proteins were observed depending on whether the mutations were located in TM2b or TM7. These results demonstrate subtle differences in the molecular mechanism of the signal sequence binding/opening of the lateral gate and membrane insertion of a succeeding transmembrane segment in a polytopic membrane protein.     

A knowledge-based potential highlights unique features of membrane α-helical and β-barrel protein insertion and folding

Outer membrane β-barrel proteins differ from α-helical inner membrane proteins in lipid environment, secondary structure, and the proposed processes of folding and insertion. It is reasonable to expect that outer membrane proteins may contain primary sequence information specific for their folding and insertion behavior. In previous work, a depth-dependent insertion potential, E(z) , was derived for α-helical inner membrane proteins. We have generated an equivalent potential for TM β-barrel proteins. The similarities and differences between these two potentials provide insight into unique aspects of the folding and insertion of β-barrel membrane proteins. This potential can predict orientation within the membrane and identify functional residues involved in intermolecular interactions.