植物群落构建机制研究进展

群落构建研究对于解释物种共存和物种多样性的维持是至关重要的,因此一直是生态学研究的中心论题。尽管近年来关于生态位和中性理论的验证研究已经取得了显著的成果,但对于局域群落构建机制的认识仍存在很大争议。随着统计和理论上的进步使得用功能性状和群落谱系结构解释群落构建机制变为可能,主要是通过验证共存物种的性状和谱系距离分布模式来实现。然而,谱系和功能性状不能相互替代,多种生物和非生物因子同时控制着群落构建,基于中性理论的扩散限制、基于生态位的环境过滤和竞争排斥等多个过程可能同时影响着群落的构建。所以,综合考虑多种方法和影响因素探讨植物群落的构建机制,对于预测和解释植被对干扰的响应,理解生物多样性维持机制有重要意义。试图在简要回顾群落构建理论及研究方法发展的基础上,梳理其最新研究进展,并探讨整合功能性状及群落谱系结构的研究方法,解释群落构建和物种多样性维持机制的可能途径。在结合功能性状和谱系结构研究群落构建时,除了考虑空间尺度、环境因子、植被类型外,还应该关注时间尺度、选择性状的种类和数量、性状的种内变异、以及人为干扰等因素对群落构建的影响。     

植物性别分配与植物群落中物种多样性的维持

植物群落中物种多样性的维持是当代生态学领域中的一个核心问题。根据高斯竞争排除法则,占有相同生态位的物种不能共存。然而植物群落中共存种的数目经常可达数十个以上,难于用以竞争排除法则为基础的竞争共存理论加以解释。本文根据性别分配理论提出了一个新的植物种竞争共存机制;它可以允许占有相同生态位的物种共存。     

植物群落物种共存机制的研究进展

物种共存是由进化、历史及生态尺度上的过程决定的.现存的理论从不同的尺度探讨了植物群落物种共存的可能机制,本文阐述了其中几种重要的理论.种库理论在进化和历史尺度上解释了植物物种共存的形成原因.在生态尺度上,虽然传统的生态位理论受到质疑,但是更新生态位理论和资源比率/异质性假说越来越受到重视;竞争共存理论认为具有相似竞争能力或能够避免竞争排斥的植物物种可以共存.在非平衡条件下,生物和非生物因素对植物物种共存也有显著影响,它们一方面作用于竞争优势种,使竞争优势向稀有种转移,另一方面可以创造生境时空异质性,为生态位分化提供机会.生态漂变学说认为群落中物种的组成不断变化,物种的共存和分布由随机因素决定.这些植物群落物种共存理论各有所长,互相补充.应用现代科学技术进行研究,结果必将促进人们对植物物种共存问题的深刻理解.     

晋西北丘陵风沙区柠条林下草本植物群落组成和种群生态位变化特征

晋西北丘陵风沙区生态环境脆弱,是我国风沙活动危害最为严重的地区之一。为探究晋西北丘陵风沙区人工柠条林林下草本植物群落组成和种群生态位变化规律,以不同种植年限（撂荒地CK、6、12、18、40、50 a）人工柠条林林下天然草本植物群落作为研究对象,对其群落组成、重要值及种群生态位变化特征进行分析。研究结果表明：（1）不同年限柠条林下天然草本植物组成共记录到22科41属52种,其中,种植前期（0-6 a）林下草本植物以一年生草本植物为优势类群,伴有少数多年生草本植物（3种）;种植中期（12-18 a）林下草本植物主要由多年生草本植物（12种）为主,伴生有一年生草本植物（6种）及天然灌木（2种）组成;在种植后期（40-50 a）,林下草本植物依然以多年生草本植物（12种）为主。（2）在不同年限柠条林下,草本植物生态位宽度和生态位重叠发生明显变化,种植前期（0-12 a）的优势类群为一年生先锋物种（米蒿和野燕麦）,其生态位宽度最宽（9.46、9.34）,且与其他物种的生态位重叠程度最大（0.3、0.29）;而种植中后期（18-50 a）优势类群变为多年生草本植物,优势种披碱草与其他物种的生态位重叠程度最大（0.42）,说明其为林下植物群落主要的优势种和泛化种。（3）柠条林种植后期（50 a）,多数草本植物主要集中分布在生态位重叠系数DCA排序图的中心位置,说明在种植后期草本植物对相同环境的资源竞争激烈,林下草本植物群落处于演替过渡阶段。综上,人工种植柠条林相较于天然恢复（CK）,更有利于增加草本植物群落的多样性,但林下植物群落对资源的竞争更为激烈。这些研究结果对干旱半干旱地区风沙区植被恢复和生态重建具有重要的参考价值,对人工林生态恢复具有重要意义。     

群落生态学的中性理论

生物多样性的分布格局和维持机制一直是群落生态学研究的核心问题,其中的关键是物种的共存机制。长期以来,生态位分化的思想在这一研究领域占据着主导地位。然而这一理论在解释热带雨林很高的物种多样性时遇到了困难。而以Hubbell为代表提出的群落中性漂变理论则假定在同一营养级物种构成的群落中不同物种的不同个体在生态学上可看成是完全等同的;物种的多度随机游走,群落中的物种数取决于物种灭绝和物种迁入/新物种形成之间的动态平衡。在这一假定之下,该理论预言了两种统计分布。一种是集合群落在点突变形成新物种的模式下其各个物种相对多度服从对数级数分布,而受扩散限制的局域群落以及按照随机分裂为新物种模式形成的集合群落则服从零和多项式分布。与生态位理论相反,中性理论不以种间生态位差异作为研究群落结构的出发点,而是以物种间在个体水平上的对等性作为前提。该理论第一次从基本生态学过程(出生、死亡、迁移、物种分化)出发,给出了群落物种多度分布的机理性解释,同时其预测的物种多度分布格局在实际群落中也得到了广泛的印证。因此,中性理论自诞生以来便在生态学界引发了极大的反响,也包括一些反对的声音。该文重点综述了关于中性理论的假设、预测和物种形成模式等方面的最新研究进展,包括中性理论本身的发展、关于中性理论的假设和预测的合理性检验以及在集合群落尺度上物种分化模式的讨论;并指出未来发展方向可能是在生态位理论和中性理论之间架起一座桥梁,同时发展包含随机性的群落生态位模型,以及允许种间差异的近中性模型。     

物种多度格局研究进展

物种多度格局研究始于20世纪30年代,是种群生态学和群落生态学研究的起点。物种多度格局研究主要在两个水平上进行：1）初期研究主要集中于群落水平,希望在不同群落之间发现一个共同的整体格局来描述群落的组织结构。常用模型包括几何级数、对数级数、对数正态和断棍模型,不同模型代表了不同的生态学过程。2）目前转向重视物种水平,并以物种多度的区域分布规律及其生态学机制研究为主。物种分布区多度关系有正相关、无相关和负相关3种形式。局部多度高的物种一般趋于广布,而局部多度低的物种趋于受限分布。物种多度区域分布的生态位模型预测为单峰型,还经常会出现“热点地区”;而异质种群模型预测为双峰型。物种多度的区域分布主要由环境资源特性、物种生态位和扩散过程等因素决定。3）物种多度格局的时间变化与空间变异类似,代表了这些生态学过程的时间异质性。4）物种多度格局的尺度变化经常表现出自相似性,但该规律并非一直存在,因为生物多样性由不同尺度上的不同生态学过程决定。5）多度（稀有度）是物种保护的基本依据,而群落多度模型能够指示生态学和干扰过程变化对群落结构的影响。物种多度格局的模型手段仍需改进,机制研究尚不系统,应用研究亟待扩展,对于物种多度格局的深入理解将为揭示生物多样性分布机制和有效保护提供帮助。     

甘肃祁连山脉雪豹及其同域分布大型食肉动物时间生态位关系

<正>群落内多物种如何共存是群落生态学和生物多样性研究的核心内容之一。经典物种共存理论强调物种之间的生态位分化,侧重于物种对环境的需求,Hutchinson (1957)提出超体积生态位概念,认为物种适合度是由多个因素共同决定,即物种只有在满足其生态位需求的多维空间,     

结构稳定性: 概念、方法和应用

群落内物种间相互作用的结构是高度组织化的。群落结构对多物种共存的影响机制是群落生态学的核心科学问题之一。目前生态学界在这一问题上存在多种不同的观点。一个可能的原因是, 由于环境因子的复杂性, 大部分研究忽略了环境因子对群落结构和物种共存的重要影响。在这一背景下, 近期发展起来的结构稳定性理论系统地联系了群落结构、环境因子和物种共存, 并在此基础上建立了一个和经验数据紧密结合的理论框架。本文首先简要回顾了当前关于群落结构研究的争鸣, 然后介绍了结构稳定性的理论框架和计算方法, 最后详细介绍了结构稳定性理论在不同生态群落和不同生态学问题中的应用。在全球气候变化的背景下, 结构稳定性理论提供了一种新的视角来理解群落层面的生物多样性维持机制。     

物种共存理论研究进展

群落内的多物种如何共存是群落生态学的核心研究内容之一。经典的物种共存理论强调物种之间的生态位分化,注重具体共存机制的研究。这种以具体共存机制为研究对象的方法一定程度上促进了当代物种共存理论框架的形成。在当代物种共存理论框架下,物种间的差异被划分为两类综合性的抽象差异——生态位差异和平均适合度差异,前者促进物种共存,对应稳定化机制;后者导致竞争排除,对应均等化机制。本文在简要回顾经典物种共存理论的基础上,介绍了当代物种共存理论的框架(包括理论的形成和定义)、基于该理论的部分实验验证工作及其在一些重要生态学问题中的应用。当代物种共存理论不仅揭示了群落内物种是如何共存的这一基本理论问题,更重要的是在全球变化的背景下该理论对生物多样性的保护和管理具有重要的应用价值。期望本文的介绍有助于国内生态学和生物多样性工作者了解当代物种共存理论,并将其应用于群落构建和生物多样性维持机制等方面的研究。     

草地群落物种多样性维持机制的研究Ⅱ物种实现的生态位

尽管为解释种类丰富的植物群落物种共存和多样性维持机制,生态学家位做了大量的努力并提出了许多假说和模型。但这一问题仍处在争议之中,需要更多的证据支持他们的观点或提出新的看法,使这一生物多样性难题不断地向前推进。以松赖平原物种丰富度较高的羊草－杂类草群落为对象,在土壤C、N、P、K和H2O等5个资源轴上,探讨了物种多样性与实现生态位的关系。结果表明：尽管物种生态位存在一定程度的分化,但多数物种的生态位是高度重叠的,物种生态位的分化在草地群落物种共存和多样性维持中,不是唯一的途径,认为应更加重视的物种在长期协同进化中所形成的生物学特性。     

Coupled plant traits adapted to wetting/drying cycles of substrates co-define niche multidimensionality

Theories attempting to explain species coexistence in plant communities have argued in favour of species' capacities to occupy a multidimensional niche with spatial, temporal and biotic axes. We used the concept of hydrological niche segregation to learn how ecological niches are structured both spatially and temporally and whether small scale humidity gradients between adjacent niches are the main factor explaining water partitioning among tree species in a highly water-limited semiarid forest ecosystem. By combining geophysical methods, isotopic ecology, plant ecophysiology and anatomical measurements, we show how coexisting pine and oak species share, use and temporally switch between diverse spatially distinct niches by employing a set of functionally coupled plant traits in response to changing environmental signals. We identified four geospatial niches that turned into nine, when considering the temporal dynamics of the wetting/drying cycles in the substrate and the particular plant species adaptations to garner, transfer, store and use water. Under water scarcity, pine and oak exhibited water use segregation from different niches, yet under maximum drought when oak trees crossed physiological thresholds, niche overlap occurred. The identification of niches and mechanistic understanding of when and how species use them will help unify theories of plant coexistence and competition.     

Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities

Closely related species that occur together in communities and experience similar environmental conditions are likely to share phenotypic traits because of the process of environmental filtering. At the same time, species that are too similar are unlikely to co-occur because of competitive exclusion. In an effort to explain the coexistence of 17 oak species within forest communities in North Central Florida, we examined correlations between the phylogenetic relatedness of oak species, their degree of co-occurrence within communities and niche overlap across environmental gradients, and their similarity in ecophysiological and life-history traits. We show that the oaks are phylogenetically overdispersed because co-occurring species are more distantly related than expected by chance, and oaks within the same clade show less niche overlap than expected. Hence, communities are more likely to include members of both the red oak and the white + live oak clades than only members of one clade. This pattern of phylogenetic overdispersion arises because traits important for habitat specialization show evolutionary convergence. We hypothesize further that certain conserved traits permit coexistence of distantly related congeners. These results provide an explanation for how oak diversity is maintained at the community level in North Central Florida.     

Positive interactions, discontinuous transitions and species coexistence in plant communities

The population and community level consequences of positive interactions between plants remain poorly explored. In this study we incorporate positive resource-mediated interactions in classic resource competition theory and investigate the main consequences for plant population dynamics and species coexistence. We focus on plant communities for which water infiltration rates exhibit positive dependency on plant biomass and where plant responses can be improved by shading, particularly under water limiting conditions. We show that the effects of these two resource-mediated positive interactions are similar and additive. We predict that positive interactions shift the transition points between different species compositions along environmental gradients and that realized niche widths will expand or shrink. Furthermore, continuous transitions between different community compositions can become discontinuous and bistability or tristability can occur. Moreover, increased infiltration rates may give rise to a new potential coexistence mechanism that we call controlled facilitation.     

Changes in niche differentiation and environmental filtering over a hydric stress gradient

群落的多样性取决于物种相互共存的能力,以及克服环境胁迫的能力,从而可能扮演一个环境过滤器的角色。生态位分化导致了比种间竞争更强的种内竞争,促进了物种共存。由于胁迫影响相互作用,生态位分化的强度可能沿胁迫作用的梯度发生变化。在有胁迫的栖息地,如沙漠和高山地区,植物的生长形式更加多样化,这表明在环境胁迫下植物具有更强的生态位分化。我们验证了生态位差异和环境过滤作用随着环境胁迫的增加而增强的假设。在墨西哥南部的半干旱草原上,我们沿着水分胁迫梯度在田间种植了6种一年生植物。植物进行三种种植处理：单独种植(没有相互作用),与同种植物为邻(种内相互作用)或与异种植物为邻(种间相互作用)。我们分析了种内与种间竞争的比值是如何沿水分胁迫梯度变化的,以评估水分如何决定生态位分化的强度。我们还测定了水分胁迫是否代表了一种环境过滤作用。我们发现了种内竞争比种间竞争更强,尤其是在水分胁迫更大的情况下。因此,我们的结果表明,除了一个物种外,所有物种至少在部分水分胁迫梯度下存在生态位分化。一些物种受到胁迫的阻碍,而另一些物种可能因为胁迫消除了土壤病原体而受到它的青睐。虽然高强度的生态位分化在环境胁迫下出现的频率略高,但由于我们的物种样本很小,而且这种通用的模式也存在例外,因此需要进一步的研究来确定这是否是自然界普遍存在的现象。     

Spatial constraints masking community assembly rules: A simulation study

The effect of competition on species coexistence is usually strongly modified by other factors especially in non-equilibrium systems of sessile organisms with limited availability of propagules. As a consequence, competition-based assembly rules (even if their existence seems to be unambiguously detected) would result in incomplete understanding of the coexistence of species in plant communities. J. Bastow Wilson suggested measuring variance deficit in the number of co-occurring species as a means to detect niche limitation in a community. The method provides a relatively simple and quick “snap-shot” analysis of a community. However, it has been questioned whether niche limitation is the only factor which might account for variance deficit. The paper presents a spatially explicit simulation experiment in which artificial communities are produced by pre-defined rules for competitive interactions. Then we examine whether these rules can be detected by a proposed method for pattern analysis. Two limiting cases are simulated: (A) all the species share the same niche, and (B) all the species have different niches. The difference between these cases in the variance of species numbers is examined. Using the simulation results, some basic spatial constraints upon species assembly are emphasized. It is argued that the assumptions of Wilson’s approach confine its applicability to species-saturated equilibrium communities. The study of assembly rules in dynamically changing, spatially structured communities requires the consideration of a set of coenological characteristics and the use of careful spatio-temporal scaling to detect their patterns. The use of spatially explicit individual-based models to study the mechanisms and constraints limiting species coexistence at different scales is suggested.     

Towards a trait-based quantification of species niche

Aims Although the niche concept is of prime importance in ecology, the quantification of plant species' niches remains difficult. Here we propose that plant functional traits, as determinants of species performance, may be useful tools for quantifying species niche parameters over environmental gradients.Important findings Under this framework, the mean trait values of a species determine its niche position along gradients, and intraspecific trait variability determines its niche breadth. This trait-based approach can provide an operational assessment of niche for a potentially large number of species, making it possible to understand and predict species niche shifts under environmental changes. We further advocate a promising method that recently appeared in the literature, which partitions trait diversity into among- and within-community components as a way to quantify the species niche in units of traits instead of environmental parameters. This approach allows the switch of the focus from ecological niches to trait niches, facilitating the examination of species coexistence along undefined environmental gradients. Altogether, the trait-based approach provides a promising toolkit for quantifying the species ecological niche and for understanding the evolution of species niche and traits.     

Does niche overlap control relative abundance in French lacustrine fish communities? A new method incorporating functional traits

1. The mechanisms that structure biological communities hold the key to understanding ecosystem functioning and the maintenance of biodiversity. Patterns of species abundances have been proposed as a means of differentiation between niche-based and neutral processes, but abundance information alone cannot provide unequivocal discrimination. 2. We combined species niche information and species' relative abundances to test the effects of two opposing structuring mechanisms (environmental filtering and niche complementarity) on species' relative abundances in French lacustrine fish communities. The test involved a novel method comparing the abundance-weighted niche overlap within communities against that expected when relative abundances were randomized among species within the community. 3. Observed overlap was consistently significantly lower than expected at random for two (swimming ability and trophic status) of four primary niche axes across lakes of differing physical environments. Thus, for these niche axes, pairs of abundant species tended to have relatively low niche overlap, while rare species tended to have relatively high niche overlap with abundant species. 4. This suggests that niche complementarity may have acted to enhance ecosystem function and that it is important for species coexistence in these fish communities. The method used may be easily applied to any sort of biological community and thus may have considerable potential for determining the generality of niche complementarity effects on community structure.     

Quantifying the role of deterministic assembly and stochastic drift in a natural community of Arctic mosses

The interpretation of natural plant communities frequently invokes species‐sorting controlled by niche differences along spatial environmental gradients. This process of niche structuring can be explained by reference to functional traits, which provide a mechanistic explanation for community structure. In contrast, models explaining species coexistence obviate the limiting effect of niche difference, by invoking processes which cause species‐level drift, e.g. demographic stochasticity. This paper investigates a simple habitat with strong gradients (moss communities in a patterned arctic wetland) to identify signature‐patterns under‐pinning the relative importance of deterministic assembly and stochastic drift in a natural community. First, ordination analysis was used to confirm community composition structured by a range of nine carefully selected functional traits. Second, to determine whether traits explaining community composition might also explain species richness, local species richness (sR) was compared to (1) observed trait diversity and (2) expected trait diversity based on permutation tests, which are used to simulate null community assembly for different values of sR. Traits explaining species composition, consistent with deterministic niche structuring, do not appear to maintain sR. This surprising result was explained by decomposing the community into individual pair‐wise comparisons, i.e. species niche‐differences and association (χ²). Results support deterministic processes via the sorting of species with similar and contrasting niches, at opposite ends of a composite environmental gradient. Nevertheless, stochastic drift is apparent in the random structure of a majority of pair‐wise associations; in addition, a species’ abundance was in general not related to environmental distance from response‐optima. We suggest therefore that spatial pattern in the moss community is a balance between deterministic forces with respect to species traits and controlling environmental gradients, and stochastic drift, which weakens this deterministic structure.