The sensitivity of RNA polymerases I and II from Novikoff hepatoma (N1S1) cells to 3''-deoxyadenosine 5''-triphosphate.

The synthesis of ribosomal precursor RNA in Novikoff hepatoma (N1S1) cells is very sensitive to cordycepin (3'-dA). The synthesis of hnRNA, however, is resistant to inhibition concentrations of 3'-dA that completely block the synthesis of 45S ribosomal RNA precursor. We have examined the RNA polymerases present in these cultured cells with regard to their sensitivity to cordycepin 5'-triphosphate (3'-dATP) in an effort to explain the differential inhibition of RNA synthesis observed in vivo. RNA polymerases I and II were characterized on the basis of their chromatographic behavior on DEAE-Sephadex, as well as the response of their enzymatic activities to ionic strength, the divalent metal ions Mn2+ and Mg2+, and the toxin alpha-amanitin. For both enzymes the inhibition of in vitro RNA synthesis by 3'-dATP was competitive for ATP. The km values for ATP and the K1 values for 3'-dATP for the two enzymes were quite similar. RNA polymerase II, the enzyme presumed responsible for hnRNA synthesis, was actually slightly more sensitive to 3'-dATP than RNA polymerase I, the enzyme presumed responsible for ribosomal precursor RNA synthesis. Similar data were obtained when the RNA polymerases were assayed in isolated nuclei. These results indicate that the differential inhibition of RNA synthesis caused by 3'-dA in vivo cannot be simply explained by differential sensitivity of RNA polymerases I and II to 3'-dATP.     

Studies on the control of ribosomal RNA synthesis in HeLa cells.

In many eucaryotic systems protein synthesis is coupled to ribosomal RNA synthesis such that shut-down of the former causes inhibition of the latter. We have investigated this stringency phenomenon in HeLa cells. The protein synthesis inhibitors cycloheximide and puromycin cause inactivation of both processes but valine starvation totally inhibits only the processing of 45-S RNA. DNA-dependent RNA polymerases from A, B and C (or I, II and III respectively) were extracted, separated partially by DEAE-cellulose chromatography and their activity levels determined. These do not decrease significantly during inhibition of protein synthesis. To find out whether or not form A is bound to its template under these conditions, proteins were removed from chromatin with the detergent sarkosyl. This does not affect bound RNA polymerase. Inhibition of protein synthesis caused up to 50% reduction in endogenous alpha-amanitin-insensitive chromatin-RNA-synthesising activity. This reduced level of activity was not affected by sarkosyl treatment. Levels in normal cells were stimulated. This result indicates that the form A RNA polymerase is not bound to its template when protein synthesis is inhibited.     

Mechanistic differences in promoter DNA melting by Thermus aquaticus and Escherichia coli RNA polymerases

Formation of strand-separated, functional complexes at promoters was compared for RNA polymerases from the mesophile Escherichia coli and the thermophile Thermus aquaticus. The RNA polymerases contained sigma factors that were wild type or bearing homologous alanine substitutions for two aromatic amino acids involved in DNA melting. Substitutions in the sigmaA subunit of T. aquaticus RNA polymerase impair promoter DNA melting equally at temperatures from 25 to 75 degrees C. However, homologous substitutions in sigma70 render E. coli RNA polymerase progressively more melting-defective as the temperature is reduced below 37 degrees C. The effects of the mutations on the mechanism of promoter DNA melting were investigated by studying the interaction of wild type and mutant RNA polymerases with "partial promoters" mimicking promoter DNA where the nucleation of DNA melting had taken place. Because T. aquaticus and E. coli RNA polymerases bound these templates similarly, it was concluded that the different effects of the mutations on the two polymerases are exerted at a step preceding nucleation of DNA melting. A model is presented for how this mechanistic difference between the two RNA polymerase could explain our observations.