Distribution of silver-stained interphase nucleolar organizer regions as a parameter to distinguish neoplastic from nonneoplastic reactive cells in human effusions

The distribution of interphasic nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) was studied in cytologic preparations of human serous effusions in order to differentiate malignant cells from nonmalignant reactive cells. The study was carried out on 80 cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma, 10 cases of mesothelioma, 10 reactive pleural effusions and 5 peritoneal washings. Visualization of NORs at the light microscopic level was obtained using a silver-staining technique for acidic proteins selectively associated with NORs. The morphologic data were also statistically evaluated by means of an automated image analyzer. The quantity of silver-stained NORs was higher in cancer cells (both mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma) than in reactive mesothelial cells. Moreover, NORs were more irregularly distributed within the nucleoli and were more variably sized in cancer cells than in reactive mesothelial cells.     

Significance of immunocytochemical expression of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and CD44 in serous effusions using liquid-based cytology

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic utility of E-cadherin (E-cad), N-cadherin (N-cad) and CD44 to discriminate adenocarcinoma cells from benign and malignant mesothelial cells in body cavity fluids and to clarify the origin of cancer cells. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 120 ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) cytologic specimens of serous effusions, which included 22 cases of reactive mesothelium, 6 cases of malignant mesothelioma and 92 cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma from various sites, were immunostained for E-cad, N-cad and CD44. RESULTS: Eighty-three of 92 metastatic adenocarcinomas (90.21%) expressed E-cad, while 1 of 6 malignant mesotheliomas and 1 of 22 cases of reactive mesothelium were positive for E-cad. All 6 cases of mesothelioma expressed N-cad, whereas most cases of metastatic adenocarcinomas were negative. CD44 immunoreactivity was seen in 18 of 22 (81.81%) benign effusions and in 21 of 92 (22.82%) metastatic adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSION: The combination of E-cad, N-cad and CD44 appears to be a useful panel for distinguishing metastatic adenocarcinoma, mesothelioma and reactive mesothelium and also for clarifying the exact histogenetic origin of cancer cells. This is of great importance in a few otherwise-insoluble cases because of differences in tumor treatment and prognosis.     

The distinction of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in malignant effusions by electron microscopy

To determine the usefulness of the electron microscopic (EM) differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma in cytologic specimens of serous fluids, we undertook a prospective study of 17 pleural and peritoneal effusions from 14 patients. In the nine effusions identified as malignant by routine cytologic examination, EM correctly diagnosed three mesotheliomas and six adenocarcinomas. EM resolved the differential diagnosis of mesothelioma versus adenocarcinoma in three cases in which routine cytologic examination could not. As with tissue specimens, EM cannot be used to diagnose the malignancy of cytologic specimens; it can, however, reliably identify the origin of cells diagnosed as malignant by routine cytologic examination. We conclude that, when EM is used to evaluate cytologically malignant effusions, it can accurately distinguish mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma. This technique will be diagnostically useful in selected cases and may be helpful in avoiding more invasive procedures as well as delays in diagnosis and therapy.     

DNA flow cytometry of pleural effusions. Comparison with pathology for the diagnosis of malignancy

A study was undertaken to determine the potential value of DNA flow cytometry (FCM) for the diagnosis of malignancy in pleural effusions and to compare its results with those of traditional cytomorphology. Forty-one pleural fluids from 37 patients were evaluated by DNA FCM and routine cytologic techniques. Of the 41 pleural fluids, 29 (70.7%) demonstrated an abnormal DNA content by FCM. Two of the 29 pleural fluids had been originally diagnosed as benign by cytology. Cytologic review of these two cases showed no abnormal cells; therefore, there were no false-negative cases based on cytology. In 12 (29.3%) of the 41 fluids, DNA FCM and cytologic evaluation both indicated benign processes. Our preliminary observations indicate that FCM is an accurate and reliable technique that may be of aid in the diagnosis of malignant effusions. The technique may prove to be of special value in the differential diagnosis of reactive mesothelial cells versus malignant mesothelioma as well as for following patients who receive chemotherapy for malignant pleural effusions. DNA FCM may also complement cytomorphologic diagnoses in other serous, exfoliative or aspiration material.     

Quantitative ultrastructural study of nuclei from exfoliated benign and malignant mesothelial cells and metastatic adenocarcinoma cells

Various approaches, including morphometric image analysis, are currently being used to improve the distinction between diffuse mesothelioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the serous membranes. Since exfoliated cells of malignant mesotheliomas were thought to have nuclear profile contours with greater irregularity than the similar profiles in metastatic adenocarcinoma cells in pleural effusions, this and other nuclear parameters were measured in ultrastructurally examined preparations from three cases of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia, seven examples of diffuse mesothelioma and three cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma (with primaries in the ovary, esophagus and prostate). Contrary to the subjective impression, the nuclei in metastatic adenocarcinomas actually had a mean nuclear contour index greater than that found in diffuse mesotheliomas; statistically, the difference was not significant. Likewise, such other nuclear parameters as nuclear area, condensed chromatin area and contour index, percentage of condensed chromatin and number of condensed chromatin clumps per nuclear profile did not discriminate between malignant mesotheliomas and adenocarcinomas metastatic to pleural surfaces. These morphometric results quantitate the similarities in nuclear size, nuclear shape and condensed chromatin arrangement in these two types of tumor and explain why the cytopathologist has such great difficulty in distinguishing between exfoliated mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma cells in most cases.     

Cytophotometric determination of DNA in mesotheliomas and reactive mesothelial cells

Cytophotometry was used to study the nuclear DNA content of cells in Feulgen-stained effusion specimens from 18 patients with mesothelioma and 14 patients with reactive mesothelial proliferations. The mean DNA content (MDNA) of mesothelioma cells was significantly higher than that of reactive mesothelial cells (P less than .001). Other parameters reflecting the DNA content also differed significantly between the two kinds of cells, including (1) the ratio of mean mesothelial DNA to mean lymphocyte DNA, (2) the percentage of mesothelial cells with DNA content exceeding three times the lymphocyte MDNA and (3) the coefficient of variation of the DNA content. Since these parameters were highly correlated, only one was accepted in a stepwise linear discriminant model for distinguishing reactive from mesotheliomatous effusions. The model correctly classified all of the reactive effusions studied and 89% of the mesotheliomatous effusions. These results indicate that DNA analysis, using the Feulgen stain and cytophotometry, yields criteria that may be useful in distinguishing benign reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in effusions when used in conjunction with other traditional parameters.     

An unusual cytologic presentation of mesothelioma in serous effusions

Three cases of diffuse malignant mesothelioma in which samples of pleural fluid showed an unusual cytologic picture are presented. Instead of cells of an obvious mesothelial type forming organized clusters, the smears were dominated by foamy macrophage-like cells, with or without certain nuclear features suggesting malignancy. It is suggested that these cells were derived from neoplastic mesothelial cells by a process of differentiation.     

Cytologic presentation of malignant mesothelioma in pleural effusions

1,601 pleural effusions were found to be malignant between 1976 and 1987. Among these were 26 (1.6% of the malignant effusions) mesothelioma. Only 2 cases showed pronounced cytologic features that made a definite diagnosis possible on cytologic criteria alone. In 20 cases diagnosis of mesothelioma was strongly suggested by the patient's history and cytology of the effusion was compatible with mesothelioma. In the other 4 cases special examinations (histo- and immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy) led to the final diagnosis. The cytologic features of mesothelioma and other examination techniques, needed to resolve the differential diagnosis of mesothelioma versus other neoplasm in pleural effusions, are discussed.     

Immunocytochemical Staining of Serous Effusions With the Monoclonal Antibody Ber-Ep4

Cytospin preparations were made from 102 serous effusions for immunocytochemical staining using a panel of monoclonal antibodies including a new monoclonal antibody Ber-EP4. On cytological examination, 32 fluids were reported to contain tumour cells consistent with metastatic adenocarcinoma; 66 contained benign cells only and three were reported to contain cells suspicious of malignancy. One effusion contained tumour cells consistent with malignant mesothelioma. Positive staining of the tumour cells with Ber-EP4 was observed in the 32 effusions (100%) which contained adenocarcinoma cells. No staining of the mesothelial cells in these 32 specimens was observed. Carcinoembryonic antigen, epithelial membrane antigen Ca2 and CD15 staining of tumour cells was noted in 53%, 50%, 50% and 9% of these cases, respectively. None of the mesothelial cells in the benign effusions stained with Ber-EP4. Nor did the malignant mesothelial cells in the only case of malignant mesothelioma. These findings suggest that Ber-EP4 is a valuable addition to antibodies available for the differential diagnosis of mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma cells in serous effusions.     

Macrophage size determinations in the diagnosis of tuberculous effusions

This study investigated the usefulness of macrophage size determinations in lymphocyte-rich pleural effusions to improve the cytologic diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. The size of pleural macrophages was analyzed by quantitative morphometric planimetry in 18 effusions due to tuberculosis, 21 effusions following radiotherapy for malignant disease and 10 effusions due to congestive heart failure. Macrophages were identified and clearly separated from mesothelial cells by latex phagocytosis and immunostaining with the monoclonal antibody My4 (CD14). The mean macrophage area (+/- standard deviation) in tuberculous effusions (92 +/- 14 sq micron) was significantly smaller than in postradiation (141 +/- 28 sq micron) and heart-failure effusions (154 +/- 22 sq micron) (P less than .0001). There was also a smaller ratio of mesothelial cells in tuberculous effusions (0.5 +/- 0.9%) in comparison with effusions following radiotherapy (4 +/- 5%) or congestive heart failure (10 +/- 12%). In summary, this study demonstrated some cytomorphologic parameters that may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of tuberculous effusions.     

Immunophenotyping of Mesothelial Cells and Carcinoma Cells With Monoclonal Antibodies to Cytokeratins, Vimentin, Cea and Ema Improves the Cytodiagnosis of Serous Effusions

This paper presents an immunocytochemical study performed on cytocentrifuged deposits from 109 peritoneal and pleural effusions including 20 transudates, 43 malignant metastatic effusions and 46 effusions containing atypical cells, unidentifiable as reactive mesothelial or malignant epithelial cells on the classical morphological criteria. A panel of four monoclonal antibodies (MAb) was used, including KL1 directed to cytokeratins (KER), V9 to vimentin (VIM), NEO 723 to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and E29 to epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). In most transudates the reactive mesothelial cells coexpressed VIM and KER with a ring-like pattern for the latter proteins. In contrast, they were unreactive to anti-CEA and weakly and inconsistently reactive to anti-EMA. In malignant effusions, most carcinoma cells coexpressed EMA, CEA and KER with a predominant diffuse cytoplasmic pattern for the latter. Only a few malignant epithelial cells from five metastatic adenocarcinomas weakly expressed VIM. When used on the 46 effusions with unidentifiable cells, the panel of MAb allowed reactive mesothelial cells and malignant epithelial cells to be distinguished from each other in 39 of 46 cases (85%).     

Distinguishing benign from malignant pleural effusions by lectin immunocytochemistry

Since distinguishing malignant from benign cells in pleural effusions can be difficult, with reactive mesothelial cells simulating adenocarcinoma cells, the binding patterns of a battery of lectins on cells in eight benign and eight malignant effusions were studied using the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method. The following lectins were used: concanavalin A, Dolichos biflorus agglutinin, peanut agglutinin, Phaseolus vulgaris agglutinin, Ricinus communis germ agglutinin, soybean agglutinin, Ulex europeaus agglutinin (UEA) and wheat germ agglutinin. Several patterns of staining were seen with the lectins, but only UEA was helpful in distinguishing between benign and malignant effusions. Sixty percent of the adenocarcinomas stained with UEA, whereas none of the cells in the benign effusions did. These results imply that UEA positivity is indicative of carcinoma and can be useful in separating reactive or atypical mesothelial cells from adenocarcinoma cells.     

Diagnostic interest of the monoclonal antibody CA1 in malignant pleural effusion

The Ca1 antibody was used in an immunohistochemical procedure on smears of cells from 40 patients with malignant pleural effusion. The control group consisted of 25 benign pleural effusions with a high percentage of reactive mesothelial cells. The Ca1 Mc Ab was positive in 19 (79%) of the 24 pleural effusions with positive malignant cytology. In all the benign cases the Ca1 Mc Ab was negative (100% specificity). The Ca1 Mc Ab detected malignant mesothelial cells in two cases and was negative with reactive mesothelial cells and other nucleated cells present in the pleural effusion. We conclude that the Ca1 antibody offers a useful diagnostic method for malignant pleural effusions, when the morphological interpretation is doubtful.     

Cytopathology of malignant mesothelioma. Reappraisal of the diagnostic value of collagen cores

The identification of malignant mesothelial cells in cytological smears prepared from serous effusions is still hampered by the lack of features specific for mesothelial differentiation. We examined the diagnostic value of collagen cores within clusters of tumour cells in cytological smears prepared from effusions from 43 patients with malignant mesothelioma and of 62 cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma. In Giemsa-stained smears collagen cores were detected in 51% of the cases of malignant mesothelioma and in none of the smears with metastatic adenocarcinoma. Using the Azan stain, collagen cores were detected in 64% of the malignant mesotheliomas and 4% of the adenocarcinomas. Immunoelectron microscopy demonstrated that the collagen cores are largely composed of collagen type III fibrils and some elastin embedded in a homogenous extracellular matrix. It can be concluded that the presence of collagen cores within clusters of tumour cells is highly suggestive of mesothelial differentiation and a common finding in malignant mesothelioma.     

Manual and automated AgNOR count in differentiating reactive mesothelial from metastatic malignant cells in serous effusions

OBJECTIVE: To distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant cells in serous effusions using manual and automated methods of enumeration of argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs). STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study, 38 samples of benign (19 cases) and malignant (19 cases) serous effusions were included. AgNOR stain was used in each case along with routine Papanicolaou stain. The smears were examined under an oil immersion objective, and AgNOR dots were counted by direct observation independently by 2 observers. Automated AgNOR counting and morphometry were performed with a Quantimet 600 image cytometer (Leica, Cambridge, England). At least 100 cells were counted in each case. The number of AgNOR dots in individual cells, AgNOR area, nuclear area, AgNOR vs. nuclear area and nuclear perimeter were measured. Data on benign and malignant cells were compared. RESULTS: The AgNOR dots were discrete and smaller in benign effusion cases as compared to coarse and aggregated in malignant effusion cases. In benign reactive effusion cases the mean number of AgNOR dots per nucleus was 2.33 +/- 0.71 and 2.83 +/- 1.15 by the manual and automated method, respectively, whereas that for malignant effusion cases was 7.48 +/- 2.51 and 8.09 +/- 1.69 by the manual and automated method, respectively. Mean total AgNOR areas in benign and malignant groups were 4.77 +/- 2.66 microns 2 and 38.22 +/- 13.71 microns 2, respectively. Mean nuclear area, nuclear perimeter and ratio of AgNORs vs. nuclear area were 48.72 +/- 19.30 microns 2, 24.68 +/- 10.25 microns and .098 in benign effusion cases as compared to 174.25 +/- 82.36 microns 2, 69.03 +/- 27.23 microns and 0.22 in malignant effusion samples. All these values were significantly higher (P < .001, Student's t test) in malignant cells as compared to benign reactive cells. CONCLUSION: AgNOR dot enumeration, AgNOR area and ratio of AgNORs to nuclear area are valuable adjuncts to cytomorphology in differentiating reactive mesothelial cells from malignant cells in serous effusions. Automated AgNOR counting is rapid and less cumbersome.     

A new epithelial membrane antigen (Calam 27) as a marker of carcinoma in serous effusions

A new monoclonal antibody (Calam 27) that reacts with a membrane antigen present on cells of epithelial origin, but not on cells of mesothelial origin, was investigated as a means of distinguishing between mesothelial cells and malignant cells in cytologic smears of serous effusions from patients with carcinoma. Immunofluorescence staining of cells in 151 effusions from 109 patients with different diseases showed a good correlation between the cytologic diagnosis on routine preparations and the staining with Calam 27. Calam 27 was also used to study the ploidy and cell cycle kinetics of carcinoma cells versus reactive mesothelial cells and normal cells by flow cytometry; these experiments confirmed that Calam 27 is not reactive with mesothelial cells. In conclusion, Calam 27 staining can help to confirm the cytodiagnoses in cases with carcinomatous effusions.     

Role of viral induced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production in pleural effusion and malignant mesothelioma

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key role in formation of pleural effusions and in tumorigenesis and progression of malignant mesothelioma. Mesothelial cells (MC) express the viral receptors Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3), RIG-I and MDA5. Activation of these receptors by viral RNA exemplified by poly(I:C) RNA leads to a time- and dose-dependent increase of mesothelial VEGF synthesis. To show the specific effect of viral receptors knockdown experiments with siRNA for TLR3, RIG-I and MDA5 were performed. This finding of viral induced mesothelial VEGF synthesis may indicate a novel link between viral infections and formation of pleural effusions and progression of malignant mesothelioma.     

Diagnostic utility of GLUT-1 expression in the cytologic evaluation of serous fluids

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent to which adenocarcinomas in body cavity fluids express GLUT-1 in comparison to currently available markers for adenocarcinomas. STUDY DESIGN: Archival paraffin-embedded cell blocks of serous fluids from 25 cases of benign effusions containing reactive mesothelial cells and 39 cases of malignant effusions with metastatic adenocarcinoma (11 ovarian, 11 pulmonary, 9 gastrointestinal and 8 breast) were retrieved from the surgical pathology files. All cases were stained with antibodies for GLUT-1, Ber-Ep4, B72.3 and CEA. Positive staining was defined as distinct linear membrane staining for GLUT-1 and Ber-EP4, cytoplasmic staining for CEA, and cytoplasmic or membrane staining for B72.3. Strong staining in at least 10% of the tumor cells was required in order to consider the case positive for the particular marker. RESULTS: GLUT-1 was expressed in 72% (28 of 39) of cases of malignant effusions: 100% (11 of 11) from the ovary, 91% (10 of 11) from the lung, 67% (6 of 9) from the gastrointestinal tract and 12% (1 of 8) from the breast. None (0 of 25) of the benign effusions expressed GLUT-1. Malignant effusions expressed CEA in 74% (29 of 39), Ber-Ep4 in 85% (33 of 39), and B72.3 in 62% (24 of 39). Benign effusions expressed CEA in 3 cases and B72.3 in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: GLUT-1 is a useful marker that can be applied to cytologic specimens. It can be used as a reliable component of an antibody panel to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic adenocarcinoma in particular adenocarcinomas of body cavity effusions, in particular adenocarcinomas of ovarian and pulmonary origin.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of malignant mesothelioma

The results of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in 19 cases of malignant mesothelioma are presented. Adequate material for a diagnosis of malignancy was obtained in 17 cases, and in 8 cases a specific diagnosis of mesothelioma could be made. In four other cases, the findings were either consistent with or suggestive of mesothelioma; in four, accurate distinction from other neoplasms was not possible, and in two cases, adenocarcinoma was suggested. The spectrum of cytologic findings ranged from neoplasms of purely epithelial appearance through more pleomorphic biphasic neoplasms to anaplastic tumors. A combination of epithelial-like cell clusters, pavement-like sheets of epithelial cells with well-defined cell borders and prominent cell separation, dispersed angular cells with dense cytoplasm and some spindle-cell forms was the most specific cytologic pattern for mesothelioma. In four neoplasms, ultrastructural examination of aspirated material provided the additional evidence for a definitive diagnosis. The identification of hyaluronic acid within intracytoplasmic vacuoles, either in smears or in cell blocks, confirmed the diagnosis in three tumors. Only in one case, with a strong clinical background suggesting mesothelioma, was the cytologic preparation sufficient for diagnosis without ancillary diagnostic methods. FNA is of particular value in the diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma in patients who do not present with a pleural effusion. Obtaining material for cell block preparations, cytochemistry or ultrastructural study is generally necessary for definitive tumor typing.     

Lower proliferation rate in metastatic effusion mesothelial cells than in benign effusions

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proliferation rates of mesothelial cells in metastatic and benign effusions. STUDY DESIGN: Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed pellets from 16 malignant and 9 benign clinical effusions. Dual staining with antibodies against Ki-67 (MIB-1) and desmin was applied to all effusions to differentiate between benign mesothelial cells and malignant cells, and the proportions of desmin+/Ki-67+ and desmin+/Ki-67- cells were calculated. RESULTS: In 7 malignant effusions no proliferating mesothelial cells were found, whereas some rate of proliferation could always be demonstrated in mesothelial cells in the benign effusions. Further, the median proportions of proliferating cells, malignant 2% vs. benign 11%, differed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this finding has not been previously described, and it may have implications for both cytologic diagnosis and the understanding of tumor biology and the interaction between tumor cells and mesothelial cells.